People in the back can’t decide on a walking speed.

@craigscott4205

19 күн бұрын

wtf is going on there

@seancolby

19 күн бұрын

The editor sped up the video when Mark paused between thoughts. Its a way to make the pacing of the video faster. Which is why you see the people speeding up and slowing down 😆

@dg-ov4cf

19 күн бұрын

company policy. you slow down when the boss is speaking to show your respect. anything for that raise

@CG-hj1cu

18 күн бұрын

glitch in the matrix

Mark learned hairdressing from Caesar

@DeltaXMusic

18 күн бұрын

the caesar cut 🤣🤣

@Redranddd

17 күн бұрын

XD

Dude you’ve mogged Lex Friedman

@mikhelBrown

17 күн бұрын

Nobody can mess with Lex and Joe Rogan currently. This guy's got miles to put in. 💯

@musashi542

17 күн бұрын

@@mikhelBrown lex is peak boring .

@ericp4573

16 күн бұрын

@@mikhelBrownlex is a clown and kinda a fraud 😂 he was never an actual professor at MIT

@juanitoqueintin5908

14 күн бұрын

@@mikhelBrownPatel is much better than Lex you’re buggin

marks black tshirt is actually rly good.

@abdulrazack1683

22 күн бұрын

It is. I thought I was the only one who paid attention.

@princeranjan3439

21 күн бұрын

what is the name of it? @@abdulrazack1683

@Sean-xr1xj

19 күн бұрын

how so lol

@hypewilkens

18 күн бұрын

It got that relaxed shoulders boxy fit which is fashionable

@BillJones23

18 күн бұрын

Brunello Cucinelli

"What Mark Zuckerberg learned from Caesar Augustus". His haircut.... But at least he's growing it out a little now to make himself look more human...

MMA instilled a lot of good thing in Mark

No way you got this interview damn that’s awesome glad I found you

Sam insights on the value of consuming diverse literature and understanding historical context are spot on! 📚 It's clear that embracing open-source principles and recognizing the potential of young leaders can drive innovation and growth in any industry.

Mark Made llama open source not because for the future of ai but so that openai doesn't develop a monopoly

One of the most profound parts of the interview tbh, he really is talking about a novel perspective of things

Dwarkesh is the father of Lex Fried Man.

@lockonstratos7979

22 күн бұрын

😮

@saumitrsharma2816

22 күн бұрын

Not really.....😊

@crazypato3752

21 күн бұрын

Why

@numeritos1799

19 күн бұрын

Lex is quite literally a fraud so yep

Green screen or editing to cause disjunctions in motion of objects in the background?

@drewvenegas

23 күн бұрын

Glitches in the matrix

@oiausdlkasuldhflaksjdhoiausydo

23 күн бұрын

They edited the video to shorten his pauses and make him look smarter

@joeybasile1572

22 күн бұрын

@@oiausdlkasuldhflaksjdhoiausydo So, the second thing I said. Nice bud

@davin1287

22 күн бұрын

​@@oiausdlkasuldhflaksjdhoiausydoyou're projecting.

@JohnathanMenezes-yb2ux

19 күн бұрын

sneaky little fuks

The people in the background are glitching (0:20)

@Blashmack

21 күн бұрын

That is creepy. Damn

Am I imagining things or does Zuck's voice sound slightly deeper now? Either way, he definitely seems happier and more confident.

@Mrachsohallo

23 күн бұрын

Hes Taking Testosterone. You can also see it in his face

@milanmakelove

18 күн бұрын

he found MMA. amazing what training physically unlocks in human beings.

@victoriawindsor8023

15 күн бұрын

It's just an updated A.I firmware. It makes the robot appear more human like.

Great thumbnail haha

Augustus inherited power when he was 19, but it actually took him couple years before he started to move on his own couple years later - annulling marriage with Fulvia and marrying Scribonia...

Pax Romana

It really is interesting how people years and years ago could lead empires at 19 and now we tell them they can't have a sip of alcohol until 21 lol

It is game theoretic. Many times repeated games can lead to co-operative strategies in an equilibrium. But in a one-shot scenario of same game the equilibrium becomes competitive.

lol that editing

@johnchao2422

20 күн бұрын

I loled too

A younger zurk from 7 years ago looks like a roman bust of augustus

Sucker burger be more likes a Cligula

Such a wild title for a video

Yes Mark 5px21 Zuckerbot has learned so much studying humanity 🤖

mark +rep

He learned to associate himself with cool historical figures.

im not sure open sourcing software that can only be ran on super computers is really as inclusive as mark is trying to make it seem

I like Augustus but he wasn't a peacemaker. He slaughtered every single person who stood in his path to Emperor, and then when he became Emperor, fought for "peace". Yeah, because now that he has power, he doesn't want to lose it. Of course he wants "peace". No war, less enemies, forever Emperor until the day he dies.

Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of the human mind! Once, men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.

Mark the man. 🏆

it was the first triumvirate not the second

@Rej-gc5zi

18 күн бұрын

Augustus was in the second triumvirate. You may be thinking of Caesar

Did Zuckerberg become a human?

That was very interesting. 🎉❤😮

He is getting good at BS. He open sourced so he can compete in a specific section of the AI enterprise. He is years behind OpenAI and he has no vision for AI but needs to satisfy his investors.

Meta 4d natural education programs

Mark Zuckerberg looks much more human now than some years ago when people compared him with a robot or lizard. Maybe it's the hair style and gaining some weight from his jiu jutsu hobby.

🗿

When did he become so human

Bro you gotta get a better channel pic lol

Don't cling too much to the memory of ancient Rome. Romans never did have a problem feeding people to the lions... they'd do it to you, too, just like they did theChristians. That makes you dead meat

I'm not sure Marks understanding of Augustus is based in real history.

It's cool that Zuck got inspiration from that interpretation of Caesar Augustus' life, but I don't think that's correct. For most part, Augustus continued wars of expansion through most of his reign starting 30 BC till 9AD. He only changed his mind after a major disaster in 9AD when 3 legions were destroyed in Germania. He decided to go on the defensive after that. So he tells his successors "don't seek to expand the Empire", but his successors didn't follow it. They couldn't. The Roman system of power was too closely tied with military triumphs, so all Emperors felt compelled to cement their authority with military victories. Take an emperor like Claudius (41-54AD) who didn't know which end of the sword to hold decided he needed to celebrate a Triumph in Rome. He needed a win desperately so he sent his legions to Britain. Britain cost more to govern than it raised in taxes, but he went ahead and had his generals conquer it. Then he celebrated like he did it himself. What I'm saying is, the Augustan template of rule discouraged expansion, but in practice Emperors had no choice to constantly fight and expand the Empire. All of Augustus' successors fought wars. It only seemed peaceful if you were on the right end of the Roman sword. As a tribal leader rebelling against Rome is supposed to have said "they create desolation and call it peace". That was Roman peace. So no, Zuck isn't correct when he imagines that Augustus forged an era of peace. Sources - Beard, M. (2015). SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome. Liveright Publishing Corporation. - Goldsworthy, A. (2014). Augustus: First Emperor of Rome. Yale University Press.

@mbhonimavunda6867

16 күн бұрын

You're pretty thorough. Cant wait to see how well your take ages as the arm chair historians chime in. Thanks. I have that SPQR and you've just convinced me to pick it up again.

Too bad he didn't learn anything from Alfred Nobel

Hopefully he is not into stoicism .Stoicism already ruined cognitive psychology by putting a false principle that a person doesn't gets upset by what happens to them.

@iche9373

22 күн бұрын

Why is that a false principle?

@verigumetin4291

22 күн бұрын

@@iche9373 because most people tell themselves it doesn't upset them, but they don't let go of the base attachment that gave birth to the suffering in the first place. So, in practice, as long as you are attached, there is no way it doesn't upset you. And 99,99% of humans are attached.

@santsu

22 күн бұрын

@@verigumetin4291How do you detach

@iche9373

22 күн бұрын

@@verigumetin4291 It's important to recognize that the assertion that "99.99% of people are attached" is a strong generalization and does not adequately account for the diversity of human experiences and abilities in emotional regulation. While it's true that many individuals struggle to let go of certain attachments and that this can lead to suffering, it's not accurate to assume that this applies to nearly all people. There are numerous individual differences in the ability to let go and in how individuals manage emotional attachments. Some individuals have developed the capacity to form healthy and flexible attachments and to detach from unhealthy or harmful ones. This can be achieved through self-reflection, personal development, therapeutic interventions, or spiritual practices. It's important to approach discussions about emotional attachments with sensitivity and empathy and not to assume that all individuals respond in the same way or face the same challenges. Each person is unique and has their own ways of managing emotional attachments and achieving personal growth.

@Theone-ou2xt

21 күн бұрын

@@iche9373 because everyone gets upset ,happy or equanimous towards what happens to them but this reaction is not something which depends upon their own decision if that was so then there won't be people suffering from anxiety and pain after getting cbt or rebt ,it depends upon the factors the person have no control over like experiences during childhood ,genetics ,random events like accidents etc . According to Albert Ellis ,philosopher Epictetus 's principles were foundations of REBT ,Epictetus was a stoic philosopher and according to stoicism we do not get upset by what happens to us but only due to our own thinking about what happens to us ,so it means if a person is getting upset about someones death ,when someone is cheating on him when someone leaving him ,about failures etc it is not these events but only his thinking and no rebt ,cbt therapists did not only stopped there according to them if you dispute your thoughts your feelings will change also ,that does not work i have tested it . Thought disputation does not work because we can't make ourselves like and dislike or be equanimous about something by arguing with ourselves ,this feeling of liking something comes from more primal (subconscious ) level of the mind .I think Eldar Shafir and Sendhil Mullainathan 's book Scarcity is good ,it talks about this topic a bit, although i have not completed it yet .Albert ellis wrote alot of books claiming to cure every problem .i think his witchcraft is pretty accepted at present ,but i will quote ex student of Albert Ellis - When important things go wrong in a person’s life, that person predictably and understandably becomes emotionally upset. This was a common-sense perspective until rational and cognitive therapy resuscitated an ancient Roman slave’s perspective which asserts (wrongly) that people are not upset by what happens to them! And that is precisely the problem. Epictetus was a slave in ancient Rome. Not only was he a slave, but his mother, before him, was also a slave; and he was born into slavery. Imagine how low his expectations of life would be - the slavish son of a slavish woman! And then he was released by his slave-owner, to preach Extreme Stoicism to the masses. - Dr Jim Byrne i do not know if Dr Jim's therapy is effective or not but i agree with his views about rebt and cbt etc .Does it means a person who had bad childhood is bound to feel unhappy forever ?i do not know yet

I watched the original interview and subscribed to your channel because of it. Now I am unsubscribing because of the clip spam from an interview I have already seen.

Alllllllll bs. Who honestly believes this?

Man I wish i never become a billionaire. It's all cringe up there.

@Ap-st7xk

20 күн бұрын

Nothing can be more cringe than your pathetic existence

@marcc9138

17 күн бұрын

you never will, don't worry.

Simpleton talks to a greedy egomaniac

Division of labor is what came to mind listening to Marky Mark boy_superangle4321