To see subtitles in other languages: Click on the gear symbol under the video, then click on "subtitles." Then select the language (You may need to scroll up and down to see all the languages available). --To change subtitle appearance: Scroll to the top of the language selection window and click "options." In the options window you can, for example, choose a different font color and background color, and set the "background opacity" to 100% to help make the subtitles more readable. --To turn the subtitles "on" or "off" altogether: Click the "CC" button under the video. --If you believe that the translation in the subtitles can be improved, please send me an email.

@cheguevara2251

3 жыл бұрын

votre présentation est magnifique, Eugène, merci.

@Kokyiintx

2 жыл бұрын

I tried, it was still way above my head :)

@SpotterVideo

2 жыл бұрын

Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. (More spatial curvature). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are actually a part of the quarks. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" make sense based on this concept. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons. Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons. Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves.

@rayagoldendropofsun397

2 жыл бұрын

What is anti matter particles made of ?

Here's the short version: The W-Boson is the magician amongst the elementary particles

@NoimannAlive

Жыл бұрын

a W-izard

I miss the days when an atom was made up of just 3 elementary particles.

@hinkles73

4 жыл бұрын

Quarks are still fascinating though!

@lass7212

3 жыл бұрын

Mot like we can go back

@samkes1061

3 жыл бұрын

What about colour charge

@baiwuli6781

3 жыл бұрын

but an atom is still made up of just 3 elementary particles: up quarks, down quarks and electrons

@wolfgangtscheu7132

3 жыл бұрын

I still stick to that idea and can explain a lot more than the Standard Modell with that assumption.

I love how you got the W and Z animations to emerge from inside the shapes. Very nice!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks. I am glad you liked my animations.

@alexanderkorol677

4 жыл бұрын

@@EugeneKhutoryansky Did you make all of these yourself?

@EugeneKhutoryansky

4 жыл бұрын

Alexander, yes I make all the animations for my videos myself.

@alexanderkorol677

4 жыл бұрын

@@EugeneKhutoryansky So you do everything?

@EugeneKhutoryansky

4 жыл бұрын

My friend Kira does the narration.

If you like this video, you can help more people find it in their KZread search engine by clicking the like button, and writing a comment. Thanks.

@shubham1999

5 жыл бұрын

Very Good Video Sir.

@veerukumar250

5 жыл бұрын

Sir, please made a video on atomic structure consisting of full information about atomic orbital.

@crowxe

5 жыл бұрын

Already subbed

@charlesbrightman4237

5 жыл бұрын

Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a. My Current TOE: THE SETUP: 1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism. 2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.). 3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them. 4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them. 5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them. FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO: 6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field. 7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field. 8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality. 9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons. 10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary. 11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks. 12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do. THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA: 13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc. 14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe. 15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe. 16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate. 17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure. 18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons). THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY: 19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up. 20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency. 21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies. NOTES: 22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well. 25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true. 26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught? DISCLAIMER: 27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty. _______________________________________________________________________________ Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way. a. Imagine a 12 hour clock. b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions. c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions. (The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.) d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields. e. Do this with the em fields on and off. (The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.) f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects. (Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.) (An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.) 'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done. 'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.

@pronounjow

5 жыл бұрын

@@charlesbrightman4237 This wall of text needs to be its own video. A bit TL;DR there.

These Physics Videos are my final resort when other videos overwhelm me with complicated explanations

@vishaljain4915

5 жыл бұрын

@@Brad-qw1te Trust me your not lol this isn't an easy topic. But this is the best explanation on it.

I am amazed by amounts of knowledge a typical particle physicist must possess. Surely, these animations took an incredible amount of work to be done. Thank you Eugene and Kira for such a rigorous explanation.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Can you do a video on The Higgs mechanism this format is perfect for it.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

The Higgs field is on my list of topics for future videos. Thanks.

@Topspeedcraft

5 жыл бұрын

Yes yes yes yes yes please

@fjames208

4 жыл бұрын

Cool

@hinkles73

4 жыл бұрын

That's what I was going to say!

@hinkles73

4 жыл бұрын

@@EugeneKhutoryansky Speaking of the Higgs field, I wonder how the top quark gets massive enough, I mean, it's a paradoxical loop ( it's a bit short-lived, so it might not have had enough time to get mass, which means it couldn't decay, but it does, etc.).

These videos have the right amount of simplicity so that I can actually feel like I learned something. Love them!

Thank you so much! I guess this is one of the best popular explaination of the weak nuclear force in the internet.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.

You can help translate this video by adding subtitles in other languages. To add a translation, click on the following link: kzread.info_video?ref=share&v=iIWTRwJlrGo You will then be able to add translations for all the subtitles. You will also be able to provide a translation for the title of the video. Please remember to hit the submit button for both the title and for the subtitles, as they are submitted separately. Details about adding translations is available at support.google.com/youtube/answer/6054623?hl=en Thanks.

@Arseniy_Afanasyev

4 жыл бұрын

What's the difference between pion (quark+ anti-quark) that proton and neutron exchange and W-bozone (the same charge, the same parity, the same decay products- electron+ electron anti-neutrino) ? Thank you PS please, like me to see the answer

It is an underrated channel. You guys certainly deserve more subscribers. Amazing animation and presentation

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.

Best physics videos on KZread?

Great job ! This channel deserves far more subscribers :-)

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks!!!

at 2:15 eugene actually sticks his hands into his physics sim world and gives us the thumbs up.

Wow, the weak force is bizarre. Almost whimsical-feeling! Great explanations and animations

The way of explanation in his videos make it much easier for beginners to understand! Trying to find a simpler way to teach my son these things, this is perfect! Amazing visuals and editing. Talented person!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Eugene is back with another cool video!

I am so glad for the animations, they really help me to wrap my head around the concepts!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

Жыл бұрын

Thanks. I am glad that my animations are helpful.

Keep these videos coming please. I appreciate the work and it helps me out understanding particle physics.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

More videos are on their way. Thanks.

Love your videos as always!!! Thank you.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

🤯 Wow. Good explanation. I love visualization of concepts. It helps me staying away from misconceptions. And helps my understanding by a ton

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Thanks a lot for the video! I learnt so much with this channel, thanks again for such great work!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Deliciously delightful. Thank you for such great content.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.

Wow! W+, W-, and Z bosons were always (since I learned about them) such a mystery to me! This video helped me understand them more than any other video (or other media) I've seen on them. I'm still interested in learning more about "rest mass", but wow...this was amazingly informative!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

I am glad my video was helpful. Thanks.

@Rationalific

2 жыл бұрын

@Cliff Jumper Thanks a lot for that long explanation! It did clear things up! I guess I thought that while weight depended on gravity, mass didn't change. But like with length and time, it seems that mass also changes depending on the observer and the changes become more apparent as the speed of light is (nearly) reached. I appreciate you taking the time to inform me!

Really you are back with another awesome video

Excellent. By far, the best explanation of the standard model that I have encountered.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment about my explanation.

Subscribed! Wow what a beautiful voice!!!

This video is awesome

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Glad you liked it. Thanks for the compliment.

Great to see a new video!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Many more new videos are on their way. Thanks.

@michaelnovak9412

5 жыл бұрын

Awesome! I'm looking forward to that.

great expalanation sir.......

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks. I am glad you liked my explanation.

Weak Nuclear Force and Standard Model of Particle Physics All in15 minutes

Was so much interesting, and complex. To see only once

Great video, as always. Hope you can help me out with a couple of questions: What do the shapes that you use to depict quarks in these videos represent? Also, I've encountered terms such as 'weak hypercharge' and 'weak Isospin' before but I've never understood what these properties are or how they relate to the weak force. Do you have any explanation that could help me with that?

Thank you, Eugene.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

You are welcome and thanks.

The animation from 3:13 is one of the most jaw-dropping visuals of a wave direction in a quantum position Would be awesome if there was an open-source page to test around with it.. maybe help other wanderers create works of the imagination - perhaps one for chivalry as well as chirality HA!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

I have a number of videos where I use that type of animation of Quantum Wave functions to describe a variety of phenomena. Examples are listed below. Quantum Wave Function Visualization kzread.info/dash/bejne/fX-mm5OvZ9yyk7A.html Quantum Tunneling kzread.info/dash/bejne/hHprxqatY9e8naw.html Quantum Operators kzread.info/dash/bejne/fo6dx5SKc5iwksY.html Schrodinger's Equation kzread.info/dash/bejne/nKqqzdGmk9DfpdI.html

I have one thing to add: there is a close representation (not perfect, but close) in a branch of classical physics for chirality, and that’s the direction of the spiral in a screw’s thread It has a rotational element even at rest, and uses a similar ‘left/right-handedness’ for its ‘direction’, and even though they both exist, you’re most likely to find the one kind, since the other just flat out doesn’t work with the same hardware Granted that’s from mechanical engineering, not physics or mathematics, but engineering is one of the practical applications of maths and sciences, soooo 🤷‍♂️

Excellent job as usual, Eugene. I'm curious, is there an operator that returns the chirality of a given wave function or state vector, and if so, what is it?

i love the smell of neutrinos in the morning

Great animation and amazing content explained in very simple way. You do a great job! Keep it up!👍👍❤️ Love from INDIA.🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

@EugeneKhutoryansky

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.

Best ever and best wishes for Eugene...

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Finally an in-depth look! Thank you

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Guess who's back!!! Excellent Sir Eugene

Fantastic series

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks. Glad you like it.

You always blow my mind out of my head....its really good and knowledgefull documentation. .. Thanks

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Your videos are excellent and the theory behind is top....👍👍👍

@EugeneKhutoryansky

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.

Eugene you have done a great job.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

You blow my mind every time

Another wonderful illustration as always. Bravo! Would you also please consider making a video regarding Noether's Theorem, Conservation law, and concept Symmetry? If so, that would be great.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

That is on my list of topics for future videos. Thanks.

Thanks for the video!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

im so happy i stumbled on this

I love your videos! It always helps me get a more intuitive understanding of these concepts. I have a question: At 14:18 what do you mean by the time duration being smaller? Does the W boson exist for a shorter time? Also if it is possible for these virtual particles to interact then why do we consider them virtual?

Great thank you very much

What I most value of these videos is the lack of scientific speculation, which I see in PBS

I love the slower pace of your videos, it gives me time to think and really understand everything you’re describing.

Fascinating and mind-blowing ♥

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks. Glad you liked it.

Great video, really helps to get a picture behind all the Maths.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Greatly appreciate your efforts, your physics understanding, and your musical taste; hope you'll play Rimsky-Korsakov (Scheherazade maybe) in your next video :-)

1:24 I honestly thought you were gonna bring up supersymmetric particles for some reason. Also, DOUBLE THE POINTS AGAIN! Sorry, but I feel like that should be a meme on this channel 😅 .

Very cool video. Thank you.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Glad you liked my video. Thanks.

Very good as always!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.

You and Isaac Arthur have the best youtube channels.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.

these are some funky fonts lmao, great video!

This video explained the weak force better to me than any other video has done before. I still dont get it but I saw a pattern of where this is going.

Never stop making these videos

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

More videos are on their way.

We are going over this in physics class right now so I'm definitely going to show this video to my teacher.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

I hope your teacher likes it.

Yes best physics Channel absolutely I love it

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.

you know you'll get mindblown when you see a Eugene video in the feed

thank u so much amazing video so much information

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Glad you liked my video. Thanks.

Thanks for the video

Really nice visuals, thanks!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

@robertcalkjr.8325

5 жыл бұрын

You're welcome. The only problem that I have is believing that "zero" exists in the universe. It seems to me that even if a particle has zero mass, it should at least have a charge, "-0 or +0". But I don't know the mathematics. Maybe someone can explain how zero can exist in the quantum universe.

Amazing as always!!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Super! Thanks

I like the animations.

Loved the vid, specially the music lol

Great video, thank you!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Glad you liked my video. Thanks.

Excellent... thanks 🙏

@EugeneKhutoryansky

4 жыл бұрын

Glad you liked my video. Thanks.

Nice presentation! At 9 m or so it shows a clear parallel between W's boson theory and pi meson theory of nuclear force; EWT was initially called Quantum Flavor Dynamics ... is there a duplication (conceptual correspondence?) between EWT and the One Boson Exchange (pion, omega, rho) theory of Nuclear Force? Or is it a "refinement"?

Thank you Eugene as alway

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Extensive knowledge ---- huge Information---- difficult to perceive and diffucult to remember. Oh,MY GOD so extensive is this!! Oh, more than exhausting information. VERY ,VERY EXHAUSTING IS ALL THIS!!

Are you planning a video on the Higgs mechanism? Like your QCD video, you could also add the interaction symmetry - SU(2) X U(1) - after all, not doing so is roughly analogous to showing a pictorial description of gravity sans the formula F=G(mm')/R^2. An overview of the Higgs mechanism may be the best place to start.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Yes, the Higgs mechanism is on my list of topics for future videos, as is group theory. Thanks.

The BGM at the beginning was felt like I'm saving the universe.

THIS IS TOTALLY AWESOME!

This video is awesome.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks. Glad you liked it.

Very interesting. I have heard some physicists do not like the standard model as they believe it is too complicated and incomplete. I cannot make an opinion as I am not a particle physicist, but I do try and understand what I see and read. I do look forward to seeing the evolution of particle physics over my lifetime.

God Bless you Eugene Khutoryansky :)

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

The effort in these video ....😮

A great video sir!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.

Awesome sir, continue your work of spreading the thirst for knowledge on Physics through your videos. Yipheeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment. More videos are on their way.

@baskarans2509

5 жыл бұрын

Awaiting eagerly for the videos sir!

Great video

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks. Glad you liked it.

Great job

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Single diagram relating all particles with actual values of mass/charge/spin etc - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model#/media/File:Standard_Model_of_Elementary_Particles.svg

Brilliant and illuminating, as usual. Especially the last part about why the WF appears to us as being so weak. It is a kind of statistical illusion due to the rarity of such interactions. Meanwhile, the lifespan of a tau is itself very short. It adds up and makes sense. Though one may ask: why has Nature gone to the trouble of all this complexity??

@EugeneKhutoryansky

Жыл бұрын

Thanks. As for the question of why nature works that way, that is a metaphysical question which we only can speculate about.

I think I understood that :-) ... so much more alive than dry text.

Nice explanation.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Hey, when the down quark turns into an up quark and the up quark turns into a down quark, is the electrical charge of the quarks transferred by w-w+ bosons? Also, after the up quark turns into a down quark and the up quark turns into a down quark, where do the electric charges come from? Does w- w+ come from bosons or is it a phenomenon arising from the nature of quarks?

So would you say that at any given time half of all particles are traveling/ moving with a left chiral and the other half are moving with a right chiral; or would something cause the particle to move only a certain way? and can the particles spin at a different rates/ and or have different charges when at different chirals?

Always good stuff! I have to ask though - what do you use for creating these renderings?

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks. I make my 3D animations with "Poser."

@specific_pseudonym

5 жыл бұрын

Huh. Haven't heard of it, but nice!

The field in which i wish to do MS is this... Gauge Theories and QFT. 😃 Great visualization.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Glad you liked my visualization. Thanks.

Excellent

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.