Пікірлер

• 
  @crabkerenchannel276912 сағат бұрын

  Sangat bermanfaat

• 
  @kyle555513 сағат бұрын

  What happens if you make it longer during a VERY long time or during a VERY short amount of time?

• 
  @wanderer.antonio14 сағат бұрын

  If a waveform collapses at LHC, most people wouldn't know about it unless the data is shared. In a world where the data was not shared with the rest of the world, it would mean that those who were able to collapse more waveforms at LHC might eventually have a less fuzzy understanding of the universe than the rest of the world. Eventually, those at LHC would have the understanding to leave the planet, leaving the rest of the world behind. If this secret continued, the rest of the world wouldn't even know about this, unless they went to the LHC to check for themselves only to see there was nobody there! IE: The world appears unique to every entity. Every entity is consciously shifting into their "preferred" version of reality simply by choosing which waveforms to collapse, aka, what to look at, think, feel, etc. I think the Many-worlds theory has some truth to it. Some people on the planet are living harmonious, and peaceful lives while others appear to want to choose other lifestyles. The harmonious folk are likely choosing more harmonious choices and this enables them to surround themselves with and attract beings with similar ways of perceiving at the world.

• 
  @j_032114 сағат бұрын

  내가이걸왜보고잇지

• 
  @jasonruzicka795416 сағат бұрын

  8:22 Take the ride of your life

• 
  @jasonruzicka795417 сағат бұрын

  i swear i was about to hear boi boi sign the blues

• 
  @umesieifeanyi40819 сағат бұрын

  You might have just saved my life 😂

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky13 сағат бұрын

  I am glad my video was helpful.

• 
  @arulr790420 сағат бұрын

  The real excitement of science is we get different interpretations for each topic and attaining the moment of brilliance

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky13 сағат бұрын

  Thanks.

• 
  @farhanfani103121 сағат бұрын

  your videos are much informative and easily understandable.i want to say thank you for providing such authentic content.

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky13 сағат бұрын

  Thanks for the compliments.

• 
  @farhanfani103121 сағат бұрын

  congratulations (from pakistan)

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky13 сағат бұрын

  Thanks!

• 
  @kosttavmalhotra589923 сағат бұрын

  watching your channel from last 7 years

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky13 сағат бұрын

  I am glad you enjoy my videos.

• 
  @archanashimpi2213Күн бұрын

  Will u tell us how to draw axes on 5th 6th and 7th dimensions. Also, it is not possible to draw a 4th axis perpendicular to other three, it can only be perpendicular to any two. If possible, will u make video on 8th 9th 10th and 11th dimensions. Also, each axes has a name, for ex. X - length. Y - height. Z- width. Etc. what are names for further axes?

• 
  @volkerjung4804Күн бұрын

  Hi, Eugene, thanks for some great insights. You have some videos that really helped me a lot understanding some things. But since having seen a lot of other channels I'd suggest getting a bit more modern in some aspects - maybe you get an idea of what I could mean. If interested in details simply ask. What I will never understand why all animations are so FAST. There are things that have to be understood step by step - and they do as if there was no tomorrow. I had to slow down this video to 1/4 of speed in order to watch the arrows grow and shrink and THIINK about what I see. Unfortunately there are some aspects I simply do not get. For example: Why do the rotating spheres with the spring have momenta that do not change direction most of the time? Why do they rotate only while turning around? Shouldn't they change direction instantly? You answer some interesting aspects but leave open so many questions regarding what you show - is this intended? There habe been some videos in the nearer past where I have noticed this effect of rising more questions than answering... Have you ever corrected a video? I ask as I have seen a video about theory of relativity which the author claimed in that you, Arvin Ash, Sabine Hossenfelder, PTBS-Space time and many more have been wrong and he had good arguments. Unfortunately at the moment I have no clue who the person is... But of course in the videos here things are covered that are topics of debates and to some extent this should be part of your videos? Don't get me wrong: Of course physikcs is nothing that's debatable by itself - but our knowledge or understanding of it has undergone some changes and this process is going on - so more debate aspects should be included in some videos. Does ANYONE really know what's ging on with space and time? And what to think about the Schwarzschild metric for example which is at it's best some approximation of the real things. How can we, one or you speak about those things as if they were without unknown or unclear aspects? This is wondering me more an more... Regards!

• 
  @hwanchoi6760Күн бұрын

  아 드디어 curl 과 arrow의 관계를 알았네요. 정말 찾기 힘들었습니다.

• 
  @hetasarvaiya6443Күн бұрын

  Angular momentum force vector yellow conserved rectangle purple shrink red blue constant force brief extra greater linear force rotating newton yellow teacher ji

• 
  @slasla2345Күн бұрын

  Ur 1 million subscribers gave me genuine happiness :) Nice video also.

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryanskyКүн бұрын

  Thanks!

• 
  @afaqueanzar1323Күн бұрын

  Very important and infomative.The way of explaining using vectors by arrow as well as by area is appreciable.

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryanskyКүн бұрын

  Thanks.

• 
  @alexandrekassiantchouk1632Күн бұрын

  Do you know that conservation and Newton's laws work only in absolute time. In variable time, for example, Newton's 3rd law should be adjusted like that: F1×D1²=-F2×D2², where D is time dilation factors. Read details in "Time Matters, 9th edition".

• 
  @kidev58292 күн бұрын

  I don't think your audience realizing just how fundamental of a generational physics description run you're on, you have properly framed so many concepts of physics in the correct and post-modern understanding of physics that doesn't lack the actual optimal intuitions required to think about it in the real world... THIS KZread CHANNEL IS GENERATIONALLY LEGENDARY

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky2 күн бұрын

  Thanks for the compliments.

• 
  @rlittlefield26912 күн бұрын

  no gravity present? Are you sure this would be the case?

• 
  @curiouslyt21232 күн бұрын

  We can only predict weather up a week or so but not beyond because that future weather will result on how now unfolds and different thinks can happen now or in a day or so that can drastically affect the weather in the future. I think of weather when it comes to predictions and why we can’t predict what the weather will be next month for the entire month. We can’t know until conditions unfold close enough to the time you’re trying to predict I’m guessing.

• 
  @disectormusic2 күн бұрын

  STILL UPLOADING LIKE A BOSSSSSSS

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky2 күн бұрын

  Thanks.

• 
  @XXIWNjinkyu2 күн бұрын

  4차원부터 실제로 본 적이 없으니까 이해하기가 힘들수밖에 ㅠ

• 
  @mdsarfarazhussain51962 күн бұрын

  Which tools or software u use to make videos like these ?

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky2 күн бұрын

  I explain how I make my 3D animations in my video at kzread.info/dash/bejne/aHygl8avcZuehdI.html

• 
  @abx_egamer48742 күн бұрын

  I just don't know why my comment is getting deleted. I am being respectful to the author of this video try not to delete my comment (I don't know weather it you or the algorithm). take it easy🙂. but this video has some misinformation in it about physics.

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky2 күн бұрын

  I did not delete your comment. I don't know what issue you are having with KZread, or what objection you have to my video.

• 
  @abx_egamer487422 сағат бұрын

  @@EugeneKhutoryansky u can't derive conservation of angular momentum with just Newton's laws. That all. There is a stack over flow Q&A supporting my argument. I can't past the link in this comment as it keeps deleting the comment for some reason.

• 
  @Rakscha-Sun2 күн бұрын

  I notice you use a ki voice. I laudate that. People have to get accustomed to the fact that the true physics tribe hates large crowds and that it hence can not do the selfpromotion the usual youtube influencers do.

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky2 күн бұрын

  This is the voice of a real person. She appears on camera in my video at kzread.info/dash/bejne/nJ6GqqZte6mYftY.html

• 
  @diemme5682 күн бұрын

  Big fan of the channel. however IMO, the "brief extra force" argument could have been elaborated much better: Hmmm.. let's see: avoid momentary force imbalance by applying the extra force force to both spheres with their radial coordinates as their only DOF; also, forbid any "recoil" form otherwise present system of forces (for example using *friction* brakes on the rods connecting the two spheres). In this case, *which is the most similar to the video* that I can think of, the spheres would accelerate RADIALLY towards (or away from) the center of rotation, if (like in the video) applied radially. This would result in a momentarily spiraling motion, due to altered radial velocities. But would it span exactly _a quarter turn_ as shown? The accelerated motion can end up *all tangential* precisely when the spheres happen to move perpendicularly to the force application direction, so after a quarter turn. At all other times, however, while the spheres' velocities do not align with the direction of application and the radial components of the added momenta change the motion's radius, the tangential components would cause deceleration/acceleration TORQUE on the rods maintaining the spheres in a circular motion (well, "circular" except when they're spirals). Finally, these tangential components would be zero with the rods at 90° with the initial force, so a quarter turn after, and the spheres wouldn't accelerate any more so *yes it's a quarter turn* ! (gyroscopic stability/precession explained ! 😀) THEN, by removing the friction brakes on the rod, and adding back the springs' recoil (or a 1/R^2 force 🙂 ) we end up with elliptical "orbits". Nay, remove the hyphens: it's elliptical ORBITS....!

• 
  @Rakscha-Sun2 күн бұрын

  Time is just another dimension of procrastination. It's the fourth dimension of inertia.

• 
  @chopincookies3 күн бұрын

  Thanks for everything!

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky3 күн бұрын

  Thanks.

• 
  @pluto90003 күн бұрын

  I like the voice.

• 
  @FuiyZhang3 күн бұрын

  🙏 好大家好 现在我才知道 明天再见 明天我就不上班了🙏🙏

• 
  @MathsSciencePhilosophy3 күн бұрын

  Once in a video "how not to teach physics", you mentioned "avoiding to sacrifice the queen is not a rule but a strategy", I know it's history.

• 
  @ericerpelding23483 күн бұрын

  Very good presentation. Is it also true that "Energy" also does not appear in Newton's works?

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky3 күн бұрын

  Thanks. Energy is not in Newton's 3 laws of motion.

• 
  @Yagyaansh3 күн бұрын

  The most deserved 1 Mil award on KZread!!

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky3 күн бұрын

  Thanks!

• 
  @tbird813 күн бұрын

  So this is completely separate from particle "spin" right?

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky3 күн бұрын

  Particle spin in quantum mechanics is completely different. I cover Quantum Spin in my video at kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZZ9pq7mlhsezktI.html

• 
  @WaterHoly-ts9ww3 күн бұрын

  There something else to electromagnetic waves bc1qhdrn79ya68hgfs0ms930lxpytcg0g2jlv5facc

• 
  @ewthmatth3 күн бұрын

  Which video is this from??

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky3 күн бұрын

  I don't understand your question. My videos are not "from" anywhere. Each video is my own original video.

• 
  @OzGoober3 күн бұрын

  Thanks again

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky3 күн бұрын

  You are welcome and thanks.

• 
  @centillion16844 күн бұрын

  Thank you 🙏

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky4 күн бұрын

  You are welcome and thanks.

• 
  @nichejourney67164 күн бұрын

  Background music highly irritating. Please remove it

• 
  @hym2794 күн бұрын

  Congratulations on you million subscribers!!! Many more to go. Your video unboxing the plaque was very entertaining, very refreshing to have it unscripted and unedited, more human and enjoyable. Kira, thanks for granting us a glimpse of your face, at last we can put a real face to all those characters you've voiced, great career.

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky4 күн бұрын

  Thanks!!!

• 
  @nuclearnyanboi4 күн бұрын

  didn't Stefan Boltzmann and Paul Erhenfest unalive themselves after realizing the implications of their discoveries?

• 
  @umayveumay4 күн бұрын

  what is the music

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky4 күн бұрын

  The music is a remix of the theme from the video game, "Phantasy Star 3", made in 1991. The remix was made by Nekoprism. If you type "Nekoprism" into Google, you can find his website, from which you can download for free his remixes of the background music from this and various other video games.

• 
  @purplenanite4 күн бұрын

  I wonder if linear momentum is just angular momentum when the orbiting point is taken to infinity

• 
  @EvilDudeLOL4 күн бұрын

  The bivector representation cleared a whole mountain for me

• 
  @pradyumnabilagi76614 күн бұрын

  the conservation of angular momentum is not in newton's laws because it is not always true. A system of particles can generate net angular momentum on there own without the help of any kind on external force so they can generate net torque on their own.

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky4 күн бұрын

  That is not correct. As far as we know, angular momentum is always conserved.

• 
  @pradyumnabilagi76613 күн бұрын

  @@EugeneKhutoryansky no. a system of particle can generate angular momentum on its own without any help of external froce . just like how it can generate kinetic energy on its own but by converting other kind of energy. take an example:- there are 2 stationary particles in space not influenced by any external force ,the particle 1 can exert force perpendicular to the line joining the 2 particles on the other particle. and the other particle will also exert equal and opposite force to the particle 1 which will also be perpendicular to the line joining them. now because of this they will get momentum and if u calculate the angular momentum about the center point the u will see change in angular momentum. and I am talking about any general system of particles. but in rigid bodies are a special case they conserve their angular momentum. in your video the force never has any perpendicular component to the line joining the 2 masses so there will be no change in net angular momentum.

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky3 күн бұрын

  That is not the way it works. You may want to watch my video "Momentum and Angular Momentum of the Universe" at kzread.info/dash/bejne/goJ8tat-f5Cxf7Q.html

• 
  @junaidtariq87454 күн бұрын

  Six years passed I have watched video on tensors and from that day i knew you are gonna make a big . My award for you is 🎉

• 
  @EugeneKhutoryansky4 күн бұрын

  Thanks.

• 
  @darnelwashinton12954 күн бұрын

  I agree with literally everything in this video. But whenever someone says something is a coincidental consequence of other things, let's all be honest and just say that it is this way by God's design.

• 
  @pradyumnabilagi76612 күн бұрын

  no we cannot derive conservation of angular momentum from newtons 3 laws. It is impossible to do so. anyone telling that we can ,is not talking about it mathematically since it is impossible. we can have hypothetical scenarios where we can get change in net angular momentum from internal forces that obey newtons 3 laws. But we need something else to derive the conservation of angular momentum in general. something other than newtons 3 laws.

• 
  @b4lrogd9974 күн бұрын

  The music hits hard

• 
  @PratapBhandari-yj2dw4 күн бұрын

  classical physics, spin is represented by an arrow indicating the rate and direction of rotation. However, in quantum mechanics, spin behaves differently. While classical spin can have any value and be measured in all three dimensions simultaneously, quantum spin measurements are limited. An electron's spin can only be measured in one direction at a time, and there's a fixed length for all three spin components. Quantum spin is described by mathematical states, with two complex numbers representing probabilities. These probabilities determine the likelihood of measuring spin in various directions. When observing one spin component, the system's state changes to one where that component is certain, but others become uncertain. The video also introduces matrices associated with spin in each dimension and discusses the implications of quantum entanglement on spin states.