I don't have time to formally study physics in any capacity currently, so its nice to have bite sized content like this to still spur curiosity and learn a little more about the subject. Thanks for the quality content!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

@Maztergyl666

2 жыл бұрын

Totally agreed!

2 жыл бұрын

Same here, these short videos (also from other channels) are great!

@RockbandDrummer321

2 жыл бұрын

@Science Revolution chill dude

@karenkk7881

2 жыл бұрын

@@RockbandDrummer321 we had a similar guy in our department, a former student of the same department and he would come give us these papers he had written about how there is a microchip in evryone's brain and stuff. pretty sad actually

This channel is really help to visualize these complicated things... Thanks!!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.

These videos are always so well produced! They have a very consistent feel to it. They wouldn't be half as good without your particular animation style and Kira's masterly narration!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliments!

As a PhD student in condensed matter physics(spintronics) I must say: you are the best dear Eugene . Thanks

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.

Physics concepts through such animations seem amazing😍

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

I love how you show Gamma rays, amazing job! Thank you for this! You are the best! I love all your videos

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliments and thank you very much for your support on Patreon. I very much appreciate it.

Turning our imagination into a wonderful video. Great job.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.

lady who narrates these is one of my idols

Your videos are increasing my hunger for learning physics. Thank you for your efforts.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

@A3Kr0n

2 жыл бұрын

I watch for the animations and Kira's voice. The science is good, too 🙂

@salmaniqbal6091

2 жыл бұрын

Don't call it hunger; it is called intellectual appetite.

@tunauzel

2 жыл бұрын

@@salmaniqbal6091 It is another way to explain it for sure.

@geraldsnodd

2 жыл бұрын

@@tunauzel When will you drop your next album? 🙃

Love your videos !! Imagine getting a heart from Eugene 😅

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks. Sorry, I never place hearts on any of the comments. Otherwise, people might get jealous.

@amarnathparasar5903

2 жыл бұрын

@@EugeneKhutoryansky No problem sir, you are always a great source of inspiration for exploring the fundamentals of physics !!! :)

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

At your video, when my eyes have taken on a date I feel better.This appointment is a meeting with imagination and arranged by you.

EXCELLENT clip as always... A big THANK to you...

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

I REPEAT this is the best physics channel in youtube

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.

I love your videos. Your and PBS Space Time are outstanding channels.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

This channel definitely is my favorite Physics channel

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

I always watch your videos and I can really understand them thanks!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Those damn Gamma Rays!

Great videos! Great narration!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Amazing video as always Eugene !

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.

This animation style gives me nostalgia... Love it?

Very good explanation. Thanks!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.

You are doing great job.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment.

Another brilliant video!!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliment. I am glad you liked my video.

Very enlightening ! The distinction between “ordinary” photons and gamma rays used to get me confused.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Thanks Eugene for this video!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

I love how the gamma rays look like super heros

Gamma Rays explained in simplified way 👌

Exciting video...I learned a lot.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Props to this channel for educating the next generation of scientists.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

these Rays can Unlock the Brains potential. what would otherwise be dormant, A Game changer !

I cant explain in words how much it helped me understanding physics❤😊😊😊😊

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

I am glad my videos are helpful. Thanks.

Supporting your content with Turkish subtitles will benefit undergraduate students

@EugeneKhutoryansky

5 ай бұрын

Many of my videos have Turkish subtitles available. If you would like to help me add Turkish subtitles to a video that does not already have them, please send me an email. My email address is available in the "about" tab on my KZread home page (if you view it on a PC, not a phone). I will email you the subtitle file in English (which includes the timings). You will then be able to edit the file to replace the English with the translation, and then email the file back to me, and I will then upload the translation to my channel. Thanks.

Loved itt!!!!!!!!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

My ten year old is watching this and there is no reason why any ten year old can't be taught such stuff instead of watering it down for kids. Of what I can remember of this in high school physics, it was very boring and I ended up getting some radioactive ore (Autunite) and borrowing the schools Geiger counter. Again, a great video!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks!

Excellent! Thanks 😊 🙏🏽

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Thanks for enlightening us

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Thank you!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Thank you

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

You're welcome and thanks.

good job

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks

Very nicely explained

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

thank you !

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Great content as always. Waiting for next video doze of physics.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks. More videos are on their way.

I don't need no gamma rays. Coffee excites my nucleuses enough

Good to know after all these years that gamma ray is a yellow woman. Also loved those paperplanes edits.

Big fan.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

I always thought it was just the energy of the photon that defined what it's called. What if we don't know the source of the gamma ray? Does it have some property that we can use to differentiate it from an x-ray other than energy? Are lower parts of the spectrum still classified by their energy, or do they too have an other way to differentiate them? I'm just an average dummy without much education (top of the Bell curve mom!), but I've learned much from you. So thank you for making these easy to understand.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

If we don't know the source of a low energy gamma ray, then we don't know whether or not to call it a gamma ray. We define a gamma ray as a photon generated by a nucleus, as opposed to generated by electrons. This is just a definition humans have created, not a law of physics. The lower parts of the electromagnetic spectrum are just defined by the frequency of the light, with the energy per photon being a function of the frequency. I am glad you enjoy my videos. Thanks.

@Uthael_Kileanea

2 жыл бұрын

About properties, to differentiate them: All vibrations have frequency and magnitude. For the sake of explaining, I'll compare electromagnetic radiation to sound. Deep sounds (humm) have low frequency. Squeaky sounds (bzzz) have high frequency. All sound frequencies can be quiet, loud or anything in-between. That's magnitude. Side note: All of the following are electromagnetic radiation, sorted by frequency, highest to lowest: Gamma rays > X-rays > Ultraviolet (UV) > Visible light (humans see these, we call them colors) > Infrared (IR) > Microwave > Radio Gamma are really "bzzzz". Radio are really "humm".

I love it💯❤

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Hi, good video I just had trouble for a moment to understand where the photon at 1:42 (for example, but it's the same for the other time that phenomenon occurs) was coming from, because it seems to be traveling on path parallel to the plan of the camera, and this path doesn't intersect the position of the big nucleus at the time the photon was emitted. Is my description accurate? I finally understand when you talked about momentum and energy conservation, and saw the the nucleus accelerating. I feel that someone not familiar with the fact the nucleus has to emit some light to change its momentum would not understand where this is coming from, or even what it is, because I think you didn't mention that photon.

Outstanding !!

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

2:02 oh lol, i liked that accident there

A Lot of love from India ❤️

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Thanks

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

Interesting video people easy understand with picture

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks.

She looks like a superhero but it's more of a supervillain ngl

So all puppies are dogs, but only some dogs are puppies. "Here, Photon! Bad dog!"

QUESTIONS: PHOTONS: (copy and paste from my files): A photon is usually depicted in a sine wave pattern with the 'e' and 'm' energy fields 90 degrees to each other. The 'e' and 'm' energy fields go out together and come back in together, over and over and over, doing so even across the vast universe as far as we can see. Where does the energy in the energy fields go when both the 'e' and 'm' energy fields go to zero? And what causes the 'e' and 'm' energy fields to come back to 'full' from zero? Over and over again over vast distances.

Cloud chambers are awesome. They let you see the gamma rays,

At 1:09 the nucleus recoils by emitting a photon towards the election/positron... How the nucleus knew when to emit that photon and in which direction so that it always hits an election/position... Still needs clarity... Is the recoil so big as shown in your video... ? Can a very heavy nucleus move / recoil so fastly ( greater velocity => greater momentum ) after emitting a gamma ray of veey small momentum as compared to the recoil momentum of the nucleus... ?

less is more opensource classic you are the best ever I believe you I love you and your work I believe God this world so beautiful cause you

I would love to see a continuation of the philosophy of science video, maybe talk about causality, empiricism and arguments in favor of science really discovering the nature of reality than just predicting it.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, I plan to do a continuation. At the end of that video a scientist, a philosopher, and a demon were together in a spaceship, exploring the universe. We need to know what happened next. Thanks.

Ma'am,i follow you since long,loved your videos,can you tell from where you make these amazing animations?

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

I discuss how I make my animations in my video at kzread.info/dash/bejne/aHygl8avcZuehdI.html Thanks.

👍👍

So that's how raspberries are made!

Cool. I didn't know that photons could trigger nuclear fission.

Cool

I hope you will make more video about certain topic which I don't really understand such as Ladder Operator and Lamb Shift.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

I will add those two topics to my list of topics for future videos. Thanks.

@Downlead

2 жыл бұрын

@@EugeneKhutoryansky Thank you. 👍🏻

one thing that has never been very clear to me...for pair production (needing to be near a nucleus) creates the electron/positron combo, do those 2 particles come FROM as in, removed from the nucleus? I have heard theories that there are always kinda "dead" electron/positrons all around us, and this energy essentially brings it to life to a tangible state. i know this is like splitting hairs but it's important to understand these specifics. furthermore, if a gamma ray is absorbed into an electron causing photo electric effect, thus giving electron more energy/momentum, how is it actually absorbed? Or is that just a term that really means "converts"? I am trying to visualize an electron actually somehow consuming a gamma ray, so where does it go? Is there like a little storage pocket? Then it releases it later in some other interaction?

@narfwhals7843

Жыл бұрын

In the standard model of particle physics: No, the electron/positron pair is not removed from inside the nucleus. There are no electrons inside the nucleus. The protons and neutrons are made from quarks and gluons, which are fundamental. You are thinking of particle like little balls bumping into each other, this is not the modern picture. In quantum field theory(which is what the standard model is based on) all the fundamental particles are vibrations in the fundamental quantum fields. Pair production means there is energy in the electromagnetic field (a photon), then there is an interaction which takes the energy from the electromagnetic field and gives it to the electron field. Since the photon is neutral, to conserve electric charge this must create a positive and a negative particle. The role the nucleus plays here is to absorb some of the momentum, since this must also be conserved. So all this says is this: There is a photon and the nucleus. The photon is destroyed. The nucleus gets some momentum. An electron and a positron are created. Energy, momentum, and electric charge must be conserved during this.

I want to know how to use Gamma radiation to myself into the Incredible Hulk.

عمل رائع

Hey ever thought making videos on astronomy related topics?

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

I just recently made a video on Black Holes.

Respected sir 🌟, As galaxies and planets , Stars near our solar system is moving away from us in an INCREASING RATE In the expansion of universe(due to dark energy).....Will Astronomy(observing of stars planets and galactic events) become more and more difficult in future days? Thank you sir 🌟

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Observing the star and planets in our own galaxy will not become more difficult. But, observing other galaxies will become more difficult and eventually impossible. It is the distance between distant galaxies which is increasing, but not the size of the individual galaxies.

Disclaimer: No actual, fresh and healthy gamma rays have been hurt for this video!!! I guess.

Ah, so Gamma rays, because of their origin from a finite set of possible atomic nuclei and their quantized energy levels, have specific discrete spectral lines, while X-rays, made by braking in an electric field can be of any wavelength?

What the difference between an “extremely high energy” gamma ray and a regular(?) gramma ray?

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

The frequency.

thanks for the video, but you completely confused me saying "what determines if we call a photon gamma ray is not how much energy it possesses, since a very low gamma ray can actually have less energy than very high xray. that's because we are everytime talking about a photon oscillating the electomagnetic field so actually the difference it's only about we generate this photon, right? nuclear generate a gamma, electon's cloud generate xray. a lot of confusion in phisics books because they put the classic picture with electomagnetic waves spectrum saying that high energy are gammaray and they are the stromgest one, but actually that one refers because statistically when they are generated they have more than 100keV. right? thanks

@EugeneKhutoryansky

Жыл бұрын

I am not sure I understand your question, but yes, the pictures in physics books showing the electromagnetic spectra can be misleading, because the definition of a gamma ray has to do with the fact that it is a photon generated by the nucleus of an atom.

I know gamma rays do not make a person turn into an angry green superhero.

can someone with a medical degree know why the hospital gave me a gamma x-ray for a non emergency need? they told me i had to have is as I've had too many normal x-rays.

wait, so a photon isnt just a photon? a low energy gamma ray is more powerful than a high energy photon that didnt come from a nucleus? what is the property that makes a gamma ray different from other photons? i get what you said about the gamma ray photon having only certain energy levels, dictated by the types of nucleuses in the different atoms, but surely you could have a regular photon with the same energy level as a gamma ray?

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

No, a photon with more energy is always more powerful than a photon with less energy. This is just a matter of how we define the phrase "Gamma Ray." This phrase refers to a photon that is generated in the nucleus of an atom. Though, the rest of the universe doesn't care about what we call it, and just cares about the energy of the photon.

None of the photons produced by solar flares are gamma rays?

👍

Our energy ....... must spit ... Gamma Rice does not show a Power um on the way>? In the sad memory of the day when the knife was finished.

What is the difference between Compton Scattering & Photoelectric Effect? Please Sir

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

In the photoelectric effect, the gamma ray disappears.

@sigma7208

2 жыл бұрын

@@EugeneKhutoryansky Thankyou❤

😊

I am the first commenter. Good Luck, Eugene.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

One person beat you by 9 seconds.

@hmshahparan3088

2 жыл бұрын

@@EugeneKhutoryansky 😭😭😭

Everything is in front. Wake up, wake up you

Please make a video on Conics.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

That is on my list of topics for future videos.

You might want to mention Thomson scattering as well, which is important for diffraction effects as the diffracted photon remains coherent with respect to the incoming photon and the electron is not ejected from the atom. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomson_scattering

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

I originally had Thompson scattering in my script, but I decided to remove it, as I am not providing a comprehensive list of all different types of scattering anyway. More types of scattering are described at hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/atmos/scattercon.html

Очень интересно

How the hell do they observe these things?

Very interesting, I didn't even know nuclei had energy levels and that they could emit photons. I always thought gamma rays were just the highest energy EM waves on the spectrum but I guess I was wrong. Why do they teach us that in schools though? And why are they often depicted at the far end of the spectrum as the shortest wavelength EM waves on diagrams? Is it because gamma rays that have a lower energy than X-ray aren't common?

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Gamma rays typically have shorter wavelengths than X-Rays, so if someone is making a chart of the electromagnetic spectrum, it makes sense to put gamma rays on the far end of the spectrum. Though, the way the word "Gamma Ray" was historically defined, this did not refer to the wavelength, but to the fact that it came from an atomic nucleus. The gap between the energy levels for a nucleus are much higher than the gap between energy levels for electron orbitals, which is why gamma rays typically have much more energy than other photons.

@DeluxeSlayer

2 жыл бұрын

@@EugeneKhutoryansky Oh that makes sense. Thanks for the response, keep up the good work your videos always teach me something new!

A gamma ray can't engage in pair production by itself in empty space, because the recoil of an object such as an atomic nucleus is required for energy and momentum to both be simultaneously conserved..... This was a crucial key concept which no phisics teacher taught us... I most frequently used to think about this concept ... Why the presence of a nucleus is compulsory in a pair production.. ? Thanks Brother for these golden lines.... I can't help subscribing this channel... Still one question remains ... The gamma ray transformed into election position pair both moving in the opposite direction then the momentum and charge conservation is not violated even without the presence of nucleus, moreover Fleming diagrams and Hawking radiation says that photons can anytime split into pairs of quantum particles.... One thing I noticed was that the positron (small red particle) is always produced (created) in between nucleus and electron in your video... Does it means that the purpose of nucleus is attracting the positron and repelling the electron so that these pairs restrain from annihilating each other ? ... I am sorry if I made any grammatical mistakes but I still hope you will understand my question.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the compliments about my video. The nucleus is positively charged, so it would repel the positron, not attract it. The only reason the positron was shown closer to the nucleus each time is because I re-used the same animation, and just flipped the image. Flipping the image only takes a few seconds, as opposed to creating a new animation, which is much more time consuming. Thanks.

@salmaniqbal6091

2 жыл бұрын

@@EugeneKhutoryansky Thank you so much... I always apprentice your passion for physics animations...

3:59 A gamma-ray photon can have less energy than a high-energy X-ray photon? This is against all of my knowledge so far. I thought that a photon's frequency determines its type. So, a low-energy photon is called an x-ray photon? Am I wrong?

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

The definition of a "Gamma Ray" is a photon that is generated by the nucleus of an atom. For all other photons, the photon's frequency determines what type it is (x-rays, radio waves, etc.)

@SocratesAlexander

2 жыл бұрын

@@EugeneKhutoryansky Strange....

One day when I'm a parent, I'm going to put these on instead of Cocomelon

A photon always travels the speed of light, so what could it mean for it to have more power? Wouldn't that mean it had more momentum? Meaning that it needed more momentum to move it's heavier ass right?

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

A photon has more energy and momentum if it has a higher frequency.

@oranberry78

2 жыл бұрын

Easy example you may relate to is that a violet photon has a higher energy than a red photon, due to its frequency. Red light is commonly used instead of blue light to give better night vision.

@shatterthemirror8563

2 жыл бұрын

@@EugeneKhutoryansky But in the video you say that X rays can have higher energy than gamma rays even though they have a lower frequency. So that has to mean frequency isn't the only thing that causes power and momentum must be related to something else.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

I never mentioned frequency in this video. A photons energy is just a function of its frequency.

@shatterthemirror8563

2 жыл бұрын

@@EugeneKhutoryansky That's true. Maybe you could do a video on that? I think it would clarify some things. Like how Gamma rays can have less power while having more energy(frequency).

It is interesting to note that "The photoelectric effect cannot occur with a free electron" and "pair production can not occur from a single photon" are actually the same statement. Both are the same vertex of a Feynman diagram flipped on the side. And this single vertex is not allowed. It also means a lone electron can not emit a photon on its own and that an electron-positron pair cannot annihilate into a single photon. Feynman Diagrams are a very powerful tool as long as we don't take them too seriously. Are you planning to make a video on them?

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Feynman Diagrams are on my list of topics for future videos. Thanks.

@jumpieva

Жыл бұрын

so are you saying that you don't really need a nucleus for pair production, just some free electrons? that seems like quite a distinction...

@narfwhals7843

Жыл бұрын

@@jumpieva you don't even need electrons. In principle pair production can happen from just two photons. The is the reverse of pair annihilation. I believe this has recently been done in a laboratory setting. But pair production near a nucleus is far more likely.

Hey Eugene, do a video on the 'Structured Atom Model' and have your own mind blown.

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the suggestion. Although I sometimes briefly mention new theories in my videos, I prefer for my channel to focus on well established theories. Thanks.

2:25 more atoms per unit volume? How does that work!? Is this a mistake? Why would lead have more atoms per unit volume than something like carbon, or Iron?

@EugeneKhutoryansky

10 ай бұрын

This is not a mistake. In some materials, the atoms are packed together more tightly than in other materials.

@LARDDDD

10 ай бұрын

@@EugeneKhutoryansky Oh interesting, I guess the formulas I am using in chem 1 aren't as comprehensive as I thought.

Who is the voice over? Can she be hired? Do you know Thad Roberts?

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

The narration is done by Kira Vincent. She is available for voice over work if you are interested. Just let me know. No, I don't know Thad Roberts.

You sound like a stern teacher that makes me blush in my no-no square.

Can u make next video on MOI

@EugeneKhutoryansky

2 жыл бұрын

I don't know what "MOI" is.

@absoluteexistence8279

2 жыл бұрын

@@EugeneKhutoryansky it's moment of inertia