Why didn't they continue this.. Such a shame.

David Mitchell: "Can I have the first of your final answers please?" 😂

Richard talking about the M.L.King quote: "Because ........ four children, that's no picnic!" David Mitchell: "Only for a cannibal!" 🤭😅🤣

I could listen to Charles read a cereal box

Eeeeoooo nails on a chalkboard! David, you were SO correct that the quote including "wet otters" being GRIM!

Charles Dance looks like Hugh Dennis’s older brother.

They need to give Charles Dance a lordship.

@HerbertAckermans

2 жыл бұрын

Lord of the Dance?

@thesarahshow1618

2 жыл бұрын

Or he could pay the 36 quid like anyone can aha

@janeeyre1990

Жыл бұрын

@@HerbertAckermans , they need to give Charles Lord a danceship

Ive seen Charles Dance in many interviews when he is wearing a t-shirt and jeans.

This is my dream team for taskmaster !! both teams and David Mitchell .The five of them would make the funniest taskmaster contestants ever !!! Please Alex work some magic and get this lot on

@eeejaybee3137

2 жыл бұрын

yaaaaaassssss

@janeeyre1990

Жыл бұрын

David Mitchell has already been asked to be on Taskmaster and said no: "I've been asked and I've said 'no thanks', explained Mitchell. 'It's a very good show but I don't want to be on it. My feeling is that I'd be shit but not in a funny way.'"

@kevinw712

Жыл бұрын

I'm loving Miles Jupp and Mickey Flanagan on the panel of anything cause they have my two favorite laughs in all of UK comedy

@troydonclarke7863

Жыл бұрын

My God this absolutely needs to happen it would be fantastic but they're all men so won't happen probably

Charles dance is so hot

1:55 I love this response

To be optimistic though, at least he didn't say glistening like moist Otters.

Now the idea of R Kelly jumping off a school roof chasing something has a slightly different connotation....

Old Charles is a class act.kkeps it real

"Uncut," and yet it clearly is. You can see that Robert Webb has teared up at some point, which is very strange if you don't know about the Tom Cruise thing.

@HERGRYN

2 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/o2aGzKeam7fRfdY.html

"TaDaaah!" Roy's first words after coming out of his' coma. 🙂

Richard is so cute he was distracting me.

8:47 Those are dead on impressions that Charles Dance does of Roger Moore and John Glen.

There is actually only one way to skin a cat. Had to take a comparative anatomy course where we dissected cats.

@giupiete6536

2 жыл бұрын

No there's not, it's equivalent to saying there's only one way to drive on a public highway in the county of Devon. If one assumes many things, such as wanting as little damage to skin & underlying tissue as possible, wanting to use blades as opposed to chemicals, etc etc ad nauseum.. then one might eventually say there is a 'best way,' but it is not the same thing as there being 'one way.'

@kelseygilmore7107

2 жыл бұрын

A catfish. To skin a catfish is what the saying is means.

I find it revealing about David Mitchell that he hasn't heard of de Montaigne thus proving, if proof were needed, that poshness and intellectualism are not the same thing

@pseudonayme7717

2 жыл бұрын

True dat. He also thought atheists absolutely denied the existence of a god, rather than just denying the validity of any 'evidence' which 'proves' his/her/its existence.

@PaulMcCaffreyfmac

2 жыл бұрын

@@urbanskiboguslabsrecording7531 Had I meant omniscience I would have written omniscience but thanks so much for joining in. I'm sure we are all elevated by your input.

@domb8448

2 жыл бұрын

David Michell is not 'posh'. And no, proof was never needed, we have the House of Commons.

@giupiete6536

2 жыл бұрын

It's ironic that you're trying to bash Mitchell for being 'posh' here, when using such pretentious phrasing. It's also revealing of course, that you believe somebody can only be 'intellectual' if the grounds of their intellectual experience are the same as yours.

@giupiete6536

2 жыл бұрын

@@pseudonayme7717 The meaning of the word 'atheist' has *always* meant to deny god. If 'you atheists' who have discovered the ridiculous childishness & arrogance of your earlier position want to redefine the word.. tough shit. Get another one. Frankly though, your phrasing shows you are still the old breed. No doubt you claim to be some variant of scientific rationalist when you say such things as 'denying the validity of any evidence which proves x.' Your position is no more based in factual observance or rigorous analysis than the most backwards of theists.

why is this just the same episode 3 times lol i thought it was an extra long special or something 🥲

@leeshapon

3 ай бұрын

just noticed this channel has reuploaded the same couple episodes several times, very weird

The $60K dollar question is: Would Sylvester Stallone be considered a ''genius'' if he had died JUST after First Blood? Rocky #1 got three Oscars, while Rambo was a world wide blockbuster earning hundreds of millions. These two films combined make Sly a very talented almost a genius level writer and director considering his age. Maybe like Jim Morrison or Janice Joplin he'd have been thought more highly of if he'd snuffed mid 80's?

@domb8448

2 жыл бұрын

No. One successful film does not make a genius, as his subsequent career path demonstrates. Talented with much potential in 1975 maybe. If he had directed too, and gone on to write and direct further Oscar winners then the case could be made. But really, no. As for his paintings... discuss!

@giupiete6536

2 жыл бұрын

@@domb8448 You seem to be (wilfully) entirely missing the point - which is that when people 'snuff it' after a partial, critical or cult success - they're often given credit for a future that never existed(So often it's not just normal, it's almost guaranteed). Hell, it even happens with people whose careers die a death but for whom, for one reason or another- people choose to credit their failures to something other than themselves.. such as when people blame 'alcohol/drugs/bad relationships' for the failure of a given person's career, when every person who succeeds has to succeed through their own often similar troubles. Of course this love affair with the counterfactual/ridiculous predictions based on spotty & almost irrelevant data is not exclusive to actors & directors... Still though, the kind of people that pretentiously call artists 'genius' for doing what millions of others would if they had the time, support & funding.. are not the kind of people to hail Rambo or any of Stallone's pictures even good, because true 'art' & 'genius' are not supposed to be penetrated by the unpretentious, they have to be in some way exclusive.. & for the true critic.. arbitrarily exclusive is the best kind.

@WalterLiddy

2 жыл бұрын

I assume you mean First Blood, not 'Rambo 1'. I think Stallone made a conscious choice to go the route of creating an image as an action star and making a ton of money rather than pursuing more artistically satisfying work. He could have gone either way, as his performance in CopLand attests. But most people even now don't remember how good those early films were. If he'd died then, I think he'd be largely forgotten by now.

@blackbird5634

2 жыл бұрын

@@WalterLiddy you picked the perfect image Walter, Mitchell is a pedant and he'd make the same critique. I changed it to First Blood just for you. Thanks for the heads up. Copland was well made, and it did showcase his talents, but I think Rambo and all his work including The Expendables actually represent his "artistically satisfying" efforts. Andy Warhol painted soup cans, I don't like the images, don't care for his vision, but that's Andy's work. I don't think Stallone's case is like that of Scott Fitzgerald who wound up typing out scripts for Hollywood shows long after The Great Gatsby was ''borne back ceaselessly into the past.''

Mike Tyson keeps pigeons? Does he keep them longer than a fortnight?

Does anyone else see Webb's resemblance to a younger, less cynical John Malkovitch?

and of course, it was Hawking who ended up in an electric chair.......BTW....not a very great physicist (ask Susskind....), Hawking spent years trying to discredit Susskind's work, then gave a lecture where he "claimed" to have "proved" that Susskind was right after all

@ericsiskosky2779

2 жыл бұрын

😂 electric chair

@janeeyre1990

Ай бұрын

Power chair* An electric chair kills you. A power chair helps you live your life.

Hello

As long as Siegfried is ok3

Sadly it was Hawkins that ended up in the electric chair.

Is Charles Dance the father of Robert Webb ?

@foucault8964

2 жыл бұрын

I would watch that show.

I wonder if Stephen Hawking was developmentally disabled as well as physically disabled. Not reading until eight years old, when you have access to educational resources and aren't being neglected/abused, is a developmental delay. I am developmentally disabled (definitely ADHD, probably autistic) and had similar delays as a child, but I am not intellectually disabled and have a vast array of knowledge about my special interests. My mom is also developmentally disabled and has sIBM, a rare form of muscular dystrophy described as a slower version of ALS. I need to Google 1) whether Stephen Hawking was developmentally disabled / neurodivergent and 2) if there is a link between developmental disability / neurodivergency and muscular dystrophy.

@janeeyre1990

Жыл бұрын

The internet says Hawking had ADHD, but I can't find him talking about it

@janeeyre1990

Жыл бұрын

"Prevalence of Neuropsychiatric Disorders in Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis" published in 2022 in the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation found a high rate of ADHD and autism in participants with juvenile muscular dystrophy. Fascinating

2nd

Mocking Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. is not cool. Or funny. At all.

@TheOrlandoTrustfull

Жыл бұрын

Boohoo

Stallone's more intelligent than any on that panel.

@danielarthur3137

2 жыл бұрын

Three of them have degrees from Cambridge University, so I doubt it. But I also don’t know if you’re being sarcastic, as sarcasm doesn’t read well over text in some instances.

@ZIGSVIDS

2 жыл бұрын

@@danielarthur3137 Stallone is worth over $400 million totally self made. Three degrees from Cambridge equals no more than one expert on buggery. You can move along now.

@soppero

2 жыл бұрын

@@ZIGSVIDS Because, of course, money is the ultimate gauge for intelligence and personal fulfillment. It's why every football team in Europe is filled to the brim with geniuses.

@ZIGSVIDS

2 жыл бұрын

@@soppero No Intelligence is defined by how many times the uppity fools been on a stupid English panel show. You can move on now.

@lukacsgergelics1339

2 жыл бұрын

​@@ZIGSVIDS if money defines intelligence, then I feel very sorry for you

2nd