V-22 Osprey: The Incredible Aircraft That Can Do It All!

Ғылым және технология

The V-22 Osprey is an American multi-mission, tiltrotor military aircraft with both vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) and short takeoff and landing (STOL) capabilities. It is designed to combine the functionality of a conventional helicopter with the long-range, high-speed cruise performance of a turboprop aircraft.
The Pentagon concept with future Osprey variants is to build upon the lift, speed, and versatility of the aircraft’s tiltrotor technology and give the platform more performance characteristics in the future. While few specifics were yet available, this will likely include improved sensors, mapping, and digital connectivity, even greater speed and hover ability, and better cargo and payload capacity. Other upgrades will probably see next-generation avionics and new survivability systems such as defenses against incoming missiles and small arms fire.
CHAPTERS
00:00 Meet the V-22 OSPREY Tiltrotor Military Aircraft
02:10 HISTORY
03:23 Specifications
05:33 Improve Maintainability
06:24 400 Knots V-22 Osprey?
07:47 Variants

Пікірлер: 302

  • @uptownkidd99
    @uptownkidd99 Жыл бұрын

    Cool! 0:54 you can see the flow of the air through the rotors

  • @MrEdolsian

    @MrEdolsian

    Жыл бұрын

    The jet wash @1:33 is phenomenal when it's above you, grab what ever you can to hold on to your space, or vacate the area!

  • @uptownkidd99

    @uptownkidd99

    Жыл бұрын

    @@MrEdolsian I can imagine, i can see it clearly its insane. All it needs now is some afterburners and the thing would fly like a UFO 😂. Seriously though, the OSPREY is a beast

  • @remedy84
    @remedy845 ай бұрын

    I like it just out of the fact that it looks like the Vertibird from the Fallout Series. :D

  • @Dzdzovnica

    @Dzdzovnica

    2 ай бұрын

    more like vertibird looks like v-22

  • @robandcheryls
    @robandcheryls Жыл бұрын

    Never on an osprey but I sure miss the “Army life” 🇨🇦 Vet

  • @allanbrogdon3078
    @allanbrogdon3078 Жыл бұрын

    Working at Bell we also had the eagle eye tilt rotor. It was unmanned with a drive system derivative of the huey . Later it was suggested it be used to recover downed pilots with a lowering door in the lower fuselage. Scary but if you have no other options...

  • @watermirror
    @watermirror Жыл бұрын

    Ospreys better not be stopped but continuously improved, esp enhancements to further lower costs on operation & maintenance. It's currently the only aircraft that can be modified to serve as AEWACS plane on non-CATOBAR carriers of Japan, India, UK, Australia, France... While also can serve as STOVL aircraft befitting on the first island chain where threats that runways will be destroyed IF a hot war breaks out

  • @Kenny-yl9pc

    @Kenny-yl9pc

    Жыл бұрын

    Yea absolutley agree with you brother!

  • @thetruthhurts7675

    @thetruthhurts7675

    Жыл бұрын

    Really? "Currently the only aircraft that can be modified to serve as AWACS plane on non-catobar carriers." Why do Italy, and the UK both use Merlin Helicopters as AWACS? India is going to buy the Merlin, as are Australia. The Osprey is way to big for the Spanish, italian, Japanese, Turkish, or Australian carriers. The only other countries that could operate the osprey aer the UK, and france but it's preposterous maintenance costs mean they won't have them. The Merlin is being considered by Australia, Turkey, Japan, and Spain as their sea borne AWACS.

  • @simplybeef8232

    @simplybeef8232

    11 ай бұрын

    V-280 bro

  • @georgewaters456
    @georgewaters4566 ай бұрын

    My glory days at Sikorsky Aircraft was from the late 1980s thru the early 1990s, when I worked as an A&P Service Mech who also held a class III FAA med certification so before you ask, yes lots of flight time in MH 53 E, CH 53 E, and SM 80 1. Thar being said, I am a huge fan of the Osprey, and feel it is a brilliant design. Yes, unfortunately there have been crashes involving fatalities, but so have 53s. I've seen the white top Presidential Ospreys come by the plant, and am always in awe of the impressive sight and sound of the Osprey. This is also the future of vertical lift aircraft, as higher speeds become more of a requirement, along with distance. Good video, very informative.

  • @peterjordansonthe2nd731

    @peterjordansonthe2nd731

    21 күн бұрын

    CSB

  • @user-nm9je2id3r
    @user-nm9je2id3r11 ай бұрын

    ❤ Love ❤ Love ❤ Love "The OSPREY" 😍My Ultimate Favorite"😍 Excellent Video, Thankyou 😍

  • @jerzeyguy71
    @jerzeyguy71 Жыл бұрын

    I love following this!!!! keep it coming! I remember in the 80's making model planes of the time.. always been so interested! and love knowing what our country is doing to protect us! miss the airshows since bein on east coast, not many in my area at all

  • @jakeh6980

    @jakeh6980

    Жыл бұрын

    Yeah, “protecting us”. Our own government opening our borders wide open two years ago and allowed over 50 million illegal aliens into our country in the within the last decade. Oh yeah, and waging war on their political opposition, censoring their opposition, allowing enemy spy balloons to fly over every one of our military bases and nuke sites and then across the entire country while getting us involved in a proxy war and putting us on the brink of WW3. I wouldn’t necessarily say our country is “protecting” us

  • @jameslee1376
    @jameslee1376 Жыл бұрын

    Wow, now that's a lot of Ospreys.

  • @abuturab1589
    @abuturab1589 Жыл бұрын

    Very good! Thanks for the representation

  • @Bragga664
    @Bragga66411 ай бұрын

    This beast visited our FOB in Somalia and landed 40metres close to my tent, it blew away and tore my tent into pieces. All my personal effects were scattered away over 300metres

  • @phil20_20
    @phil20_20 Жыл бұрын

    Just like any new tech, it takes a lot of development.

  • @oneloveeduardo
    @oneloveeduardo Жыл бұрын

    Nice that's a lot of aircrafts.

  • @Kevan808
    @Kevan808 Жыл бұрын

    Great seeing footage from Hawaii 🤙🏽

  • @Travis_22
    @Travis_22 Жыл бұрын

    Impressive aircraft

  • @marksagert3848
    @marksagert3848 Жыл бұрын

    I could not find where you specifically referenced why this aircraft was a shame. Was your title designed to attract clicks?

  • @albertlee1255
    @albertlee1255 Жыл бұрын

    Thanks USA for taking care of business.

  • @carlidrk1710
    @carlidrk1710 Жыл бұрын

    Damn on min 0:42. How fast it can fly up :o

  • @asintonic
    @asintonic Жыл бұрын

    wowsers!

  • @mo3225-c8r
    @mo3225-c8r Жыл бұрын

    What happens to the bullets that fall in the sea at 4:44?

  • @Mayox63
    @Mayox6310 ай бұрын

    When they become autonomous, no more troops will need to die. It already resembles a huge drone right?

  • @judithstelmach4279
    @judithstelmach4279 Жыл бұрын

    Nice

  • @ukar69
    @ukar69 Жыл бұрын

    I’m looking at several right now, across the runway at RAF Mildenhall

  • @jakeflores8900
    @jakeflores890021 күн бұрын

    I love V-22 osprey tilt rotor drone.

  • @HeatherMerrell
    @HeatherMerrell Жыл бұрын

    Beast

  • @trevorjennings589

    @trevorjennings589

    Жыл бұрын

    Hello Heather, how are you doing today, hope you’re fine and safe from the Virus??

  • @HeatherMerrell

    @HeatherMerrell

    Жыл бұрын

    @@trevorjennings589, I cannot die anymore. So, I'm good. Thanks for asking.

  • @kempmt1
    @kempmt1 Жыл бұрын

    There was an idea for an S-3 Viking replacement using the V-22.

  • @francisrosato8673
    @francisrosato8673 Жыл бұрын

    The concept has been in development for nearly 60 years. Still being improved but far more than half baked.

  • @filmtvbiz
    @filmtvbiz Жыл бұрын

    Saw BBC a C-17 a little over a month ago. A CV-22, yesterday. Pasadena/Los Angeles CA. But hey, nothing to see here, move along. 😎 Keep your powder dry, watch your six,stay frosty. 🕊️✌️

  • @SargntZippo
    @SargntZippo Жыл бұрын

    I'm surprised one of these hasn't been turned into a gunship..

  • @swaghauler8334

    @swaghauler8334

    Жыл бұрын

    They have.

  • @thuggeegaming659

    @thuggeegaming659

    Жыл бұрын

    There's a separate program for that.

  • @dougmoore5923

    @dougmoore5923

    Жыл бұрын

    It would shoot itself!

  • @LA-ep2nr

    @LA-ep2nr

    Жыл бұрын

    That’s another issue. The design prevents you from incorporating forward facing guns. It other words, you would either hit the props or as the case with the floor mounted gun, induce massive vibrations and/or failure.

  • @thuggeegaming659

    @thuggeegaming659

    Жыл бұрын

    @@dougmoore5923 Not necessarily a problem for tiltrotors, you can turn a tiltrotor into a gunship, but this particular design wasn't designed with that in mind.

  • @willywilmouth
    @willywilmouth10 ай бұрын

    USAF....Toujours au Top...Belle vidéo, Merci.......Cdt

  • @rovermiles1
    @rovermiles110 ай бұрын

    Still waiting for a spooky gunship version of this aircraft....that'd be totally bada$$!

  • @CyanSythe
    @CyanSythe6 күн бұрын

    I cant tell if I should be proud or disappointed in myself how Half-Life is the only way I really knew this awesome thing before I watched this video. Amazing

  • @NarekAvetisyan
    @NarekAvetisyan Жыл бұрын

    One of the coolest aircraft ever!

  • @littlejimmy7402
    @littlejimmy7402 Жыл бұрын

    I'm a big devotee of the "K.I.S.S." (Keep It Simple Stupid) method of system design (any kind of system), sometimes you can't though. I've had the stinkeye towards the Osprey since the beginning of the program. While it's pretty much part of every government program that they end up with a flawed system and think they can "fix it in production", and they usually can. The Osprey has been fairly successful, I think there were probably better designs available (better as in "can do the same jobs as good or better for cheaper"). I was in the Army, part of the MLRS program in the 80's and again in the early 2000's. That system has evolved so much, the HIMARs is amazing. I'm not sure what the computer is for that Fire Control System (FCS). But, I think as of 2006, it was still like a x286 or x386. Didn't need a ton of compute power for all that firepower.

  • @martiner
    @martiner Жыл бұрын

    Compared to choppers, it flies faster and farther. It's the best transportation for civil purpose in rural area especially far islands.

  • @thuggeegaming659
    @thuggeegaming659 Жыл бұрын

    6:54 I thought of this idea myself, and I'm glad it's being pursued! Get the best of both worlds, the hover efficiency of a helicopter, with the speed of a jet. Amazing! Definitely has potential to become a gunship as well.

  • @michaelwilliams9574

    @michaelwilliams9574

    Жыл бұрын

    Definitely not the speed of a jet. Not by a long shot.... The next generation possibly but not the current V-22.

  • @thuggeegaming659

    @thuggeegaming659

    Жыл бұрын

    @@michaelwilliams9574 You didn't check the timestamp. Check the timestamp, then read my comment again.

  • @mariusalinpostolache1179

    @mariusalinpostolache1179

    Жыл бұрын

    This îs only for troopers carrier😇😇

  • @thuggeegaming659

    @thuggeegaming659

    Жыл бұрын

    @@mariusalinpostolache1179 Nope, tilt rotor or the more advanced concept they showed off, can be adapted for gunships as well.

  • @Malamockq

    @Malamockq

    Жыл бұрын

    @@michaelwilliams9574 The video showed off a concept of a tiltrotor that had rotors that folded up and converted into jet engines. He posted the time stamp where the concept was showed off.

  • @robertcameron3455
    @robertcameron3455 Жыл бұрын

    Australian navy needs to buy this aircraft as we have 2 carriers no aircraft no fleet aircover also need f35

  • @charlieb6083
    @charlieb60832 күн бұрын

    A Instagram comment brought me here. Amazing tech

  • @pcexp
    @pcexp Жыл бұрын

    The airforce have grounded all V22's but the marines and navy are still flying theirs. Japan has also grounded all V22's.

  • @RodP0351

    @RodP0351

    Жыл бұрын

    Thats because We ready to die as soon as we get on one, but no better way to travel lol

  • @AA-xo9uw

    @AA-xo9uw

    Жыл бұрын

    Slife has an ulterior motive.

  • @christopherwilliams6746

    @christopherwilliams6746

    10 ай бұрын

    ​@@RodP0351dang, I looked this video up after hearing about the 3 marines who just died on one of these things during a training exercise in Australia. I pray they knew Jesus and comfort to their families and they come to know Jesus.

  • @desivideshi4853
    @desivideshi4853 Жыл бұрын

    👌👌👌

  • @TheWheels1965
    @TheWheels1965 Жыл бұрын

    It would great to see a four engine long body osprey.

  • @mariusalinpostolache1179

    @mariusalinpostolache1179

    Жыл бұрын

    Two its enough🤒

  • @Yafale

    @Yafale

    Жыл бұрын

    Would waste more fuel

  • @bumbum4592
    @bumbum4592 Жыл бұрын

    Could we instead of movable Rotary blade design, use the Jet Engine in the same way?

  • @cgmax7
    @cgmax7 Жыл бұрын

    when they will launch v 280 valor??

  • @garywillis9528
    @garywillis95288 ай бұрын

    I thought it was a gimmick until I researched it. The Navy Procurement system has made it great. It is expensive but has become the world's safest aircraft. By its nature it is faster and has more range than any helicopter. This is because a helicopter is limited by the rotar speed that is the side where the rotar iis advancing cannot exceed the speed of sound. The v22 avoids the critical problem that helicopters face by rapidly transitioning to the aircraft mode while helicopters spend a longet time in an altitude where they can't autorotate if the engine fails.

  • @Murffly3
    @Murffly310 ай бұрын

    It's an amazing aircraft. I think it's important to understand the A/C does not have the capabilities as a helicopter landing into confined areas. So Pilots need to be more careful in those environments.

  • @chrissmith7669

    @chrissmith7669

    10 ай бұрын

    No different than a Chinook really

  • @jeromevincente2932
    @jeromevincente2932 Жыл бұрын

    Attach the new tank below the Osprey to increase tank range!

  • @ChessNoobX
    @ChessNoobX Жыл бұрын

    Who can hate this master piece? Jealousy makes you nasty.

  • @ENGBriseB

    @ENGBriseB

    Жыл бұрын

    Envy is the sincerest form of flattery.

  • @bigchungus1848

    @bigchungus1848

    Жыл бұрын

    It’s not about hate, it’s just that there are choppers that could do the job better. Like The King.

  • @meathead6155
    @meathead6155Ай бұрын

    "Okay, Goose 7. Proceed to sector 112 LZ and rendezvous with Alpha Bravo Tango. Over." - HECU Marine Command.

  • @memonk11
    @memonk11 Жыл бұрын

    Man. The Ivan bots are out of control on this one.

  • @michaelbeltran2969

    @michaelbeltran2969

    Жыл бұрын

    yeah "ivanbots" not former Marines - yeah, you got us you f**king clown!!

  • @trespire
    @trespire Жыл бұрын

    Is the USNAVY CMV-22B performing the role of COD ?

  • @onfg9246
    @onfg9246 Жыл бұрын

    How is this guy I have heard his voice in multiple channels????

  • @garyjanssen5388
    @garyjanssen538810 ай бұрын

    As impressive as they are, they are like the Robenson helicopter, you would never get me in one, unless i had too lol.

  • @n3v3rforgott3n9

    @n3v3rforgott3n9

    9 ай бұрын

    Let's examine the crash numbers from the last 10 years. The Army operates about 2,100 UH-60's including the national guard and special operations: >The current Army Acquisition Objective, or AAO, for its UH-60 Black Hawk fleet currently sits at 2,135 aircraft. The Navy has about 550, and the Air Force has about 100. Lets call it a total fleet of about 2,800. There are about 450 V-22's across all variants. Roughly 6.25 times smaller of an overall fleet so the 60's would have to crash 6.25 times more often to make the rate equal. Over the last 10 years, here's how the two airframes compare for accidents: V-22: 7 crashes H-60 : 51 crashes For the 60 to crash less it would have had to keep their number below ~44 So no it is as safe if not safer than most rotorwing aircraft the military uses

  • @chelinfusco6403
    @chelinfusco640310 ай бұрын

    7:10 A James Bond special?

  • @arindamray1985
    @arindamray1985 Жыл бұрын

    INDIA URGENTLY NEEDS V 22 OSPREY TILT ROTOR HELICOPTER FROM USA TO COUNTER CHINA

  • @keithjasperato9426
    @keithjasperato9426 Жыл бұрын

    The cost of it can be compensated with the taste of javelin

  • @AgentH17
    @AgentH1711 ай бұрын

    Imagine Canada purchasing Osprey 🤯

  • @jackjmaheriii
    @jackjmaheriii Жыл бұрын

    Bruh…. The V-280 looks cool, but if it has the rotor wash of a CV-22, I don’t want any part of it.

  • @swaghauler8334

    @swaghauler8334

    Жыл бұрын

    I think the pusher design is ahead. Cheaper to maintain and faster than the Valor.

  • @robertwilson3866
    @robertwilson3866 Жыл бұрын

    This new tech looks great but also looks like a massive sitting target in a real war situation.

  • @chrissmith7669

    @chrissmith7669

    9 ай бұрын

    Well timed Tilting of the rotor prevents it being a sitting duck

  • @kietTran-fz3uc
    @kietTran-fz3uc Жыл бұрын

    2020 cả đống 4 nam trước ít hơn

  • @Telephaz
    @Telephaz11 ай бұрын

    When I see this I can’t stop thinking of the avenger from gta

  • @thotparraka6690
    @thotparraka6690 Жыл бұрын

    I take it.

  • @take5th
    @take5th Жыл бұрын

    I was a structural design engineer. I worked on the Osprey in 1984 at Grumman and then in 1986 at Bell, when the project was, at that time, put on hold. It is a very complicated aircraft, in a mechanical sense. I never had a handle on the design overall, and many many hands were laid on that program over the decades. I think it is a mess and will remain a mess. Just my sense of it.

  • @tommym321

    @tommym321

    Жыл бұрын

    Was it thought up because of the disaster of Operation Eagle Claw?

  • @lapiz4azulli
    @lapiz4azulli7 ай бұрын

    I rather use the Mi24 hind copter.......rugged and durable

  • @stephenp8232
    @stephenp8232 Жыл бұрын

    Says no one who has to actually touch one.

  • @trapperjohn6089
    @trapperjohn6089 Жыл бұрын

    Defective clutches

  • @scottcates
    @scottcates Жыл бұрын

    Deadstick? Autorotation?

  • @swaghauler8334

    @swaghauler8334

    Жыл бұрын

    Neither. One reason for their safety record.

  • @AA-xo9uw

    @AA-xo9uw

    Жыл бұрын

    @@swaghauler8334 "One reason for their safety record."(sic) Lowest mishap rate in the rotary wing fleet, pogue.

  • @basicprogaming9782
    @basicprogaming9782 Жыл бұрын

    Had a bunch come to our flightline while at Buehring. As part of the aviation mechanics we were offered a chance to take flights in them. We all declined. 😆😆

  • @chrissmith7669

    @chrissmith7669

    9 ай бұрын

    Everybody in our unit would push each other out of the way to ride in one. Once it transitions it’s like riding one hell of a turboprop

  • @jeromevincente2932
    @jeromevincente2932 Жыл бұрын

    Why not keep the vertical prop but add jet engines for horizontal flight?

  • @grimmlinn

    @grimmlinn

    Жыл бұрын

    Because dual engines are heavy and costly

  • @AA-xo9uw

    @AA-xo9uw

    Жыл бұрын

    Jet engines are extremely inefficient at low altitude.

  • @TellenJones
    @TellenJones7 ай бұрын

    Do it all, including mysterious crashes.

  • @yoshikiharo1020
    @yoshikiharo1020 Жыл бұрын

    No SV-22?

  • @kailebkrauss1795
    @kailebkrauss1795 Жыл бұрын

    The Aten warthog is I think it’s still in commission because the eight and hugs mignon oh the A-10 warthog has a mini gun that goes brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

  • @lowenmond
    @lowenmond2 ай бұрын

    Very nice idea, but realization could have been WAY better. In several aspects of construction. I am not at all a hater, again: verry good idea ( but ). P.S.: You can not buy everything with money.

  • @user-kq4tk5nw6m
    @user-kq4tk5nw6m9 ай бұрын

    Part of 33

  • @karronpitman6368
    @karronpitman6368 Жыл бұрын

    What does the pilots of the V-22 think of its safety issues???

  • @swaghauler8334

    @swaghauler8334

    Жыл бұрын

    EVERYONE KNOWS they have a very bad safety record but the pilots still love them anyway. I guess it's the aircraft version of a "toxic relationship."

  • @Surprisedsinglee

    @Surprisedsinglee

    Жыл бұрын

    @@swaghauler8334 bad safety record? I read from many places that it has above average accidents rates.

  • @AA-xo9uw

    @AA-xo9uw

    Жыл бұрын

    @@swaghauler8334 "EVERYONE KNOWS they have a very bad safety record"(sic) Only ignorant neophytes parroting Bravo Sierra myths "knows" that load of garbage.

  • @williampitt1537

    @williampitt1537

    Жыл бұрын

    @@Surprisedsinglee *below

  • @shaunhectorsy29
    @shaunhectorsy294 ай бұрын

    dude IF THEY WANT THE OSPREY TO STOP CRASHING THEN WHY WONT THEY FIX THE GEARBOX AND CLUTCH PROBLEM OR ANY TYPES OF PROBLEMS OF THE AIRCRAFT

  • @The_Wandering_Croc
    @The_Wandering_Croc11 ай бұрын

    Silly little aircraft thats in every single game i seem to play

  • @kailebkrauss1795
    @kailebkrauss1795 Жыл бұрын

    Also the SR 71 is a super sonic stealth jet

  • @PendulumMapTarotLightWorker
    @PendulumMapTarotLightWorker Жыл бұрын

    What about the new Long Range Reconnaissance Plane like the Osprey but has Jet engines

  • @RGB06084
    @RGB06084 Жыл бұрын

    In addition to its capabilities, the Air Force has grounded all 52 of their aircraft because of a clutch issue!

  • @robertmuller3145

    @robertmuller3145

    Жыл бұрын

    temporary, you don't fool anyone's knowledge with stupid comments

  • @RGB06084

    @RGB06084

    Жыл бұрын

    Grow up. The aircraft has been plauged with problems. In fact, it will be replaced! Mind your own business punk!

  • @johnsilver9338

    @johnsilver9338

    Жыл бұрын

    F-35 was also grounded due to ejection seat problem recently. But it's fixed now. V-22 will be the same.

  • @AA-xo9uw

    @AA-xo9uw

    Жыл бұрын

    Jim Slife has an ulterior motive in issuing the grounding order for the CV-22s as the rare clutch issue has been known about since 2010 and the Marine Corps has developed and implemented procedures to deal with it should it occur. The Marine Corps and the Navy continue to operate their MV-22s and CMV-22s.

  • @davidlambert1102

    @davidlambert1102

    Жыл бұрын

    Perhaps you heard that they grounded the entire fleet of CH-47 Chinooks a couple of days ago. Been in service since 1962(60 years). Doesn't mean it is a horrible aircraft. If I'm not mistaken, it is the fastest chopper in the Army, and one of the most successful aircraft of all time.

  • @allanwagner4570
    @allanwagner4570 Жыл бұрын

    Yeah it’s a really cool aircraft however I Helped with some repairs operating a crane in Phoenix an emergency repair for the Marine Corps and they never paid their bill

  • @SMBflims
    @SMBflimsАй бұрын

    I have this in gta lol

  • @andrewbarlow8937
    @andrewbarlow8937 Жыл бұрын

    Helicopter is an aircraft

  • @michaelmatta3463
    @michaelmatta3463 Жыл бұрын

    It would be nice to replace the propellers with jet engines similar to f 35

  • @AA-xo9uw

    @AA-xo9uw

    Жыл бұрын

    Jets proved to be highly inefficient and the concept was already tried and rejected with the Do 31.

  • @nancyjohnson5810
    @nancyjohnson581011 ай бұрын

    Yeah it can do it all right like crash every other month loaded with military personal! Now another crash in Australia with 20 aboard!

  • @n3v3rforgott3n9

    @n3v3rforgott3n9

    9 ай бұрын

    Let's examine the crash numbers from the last 10 years. The Army operates about 2,100 UH-60's including the national guard and special operations: >The current Army Acquisition Objective, or AAO, for its UH-60 Black Hawk fleet currently sits at 2,135 aircraft. The Navy has about 550, and the Air Force has about 100. Lets call it a total fleet of about 2,800. There are about 450 V-22's across all variants. Roughly 6.25 times smaller of an overall fleet so the 60's would have to crash 6.25 times more often to make the rate equal. Over the last 10 years, here's how the two airframes compare for accidents: V-22: 7 crashes H-60 : 51 crashes For the 60 to crash less it would have had to keep their number below ~44 So no it is as safe if not safer than most rotorwing aircraft the military uses

  • @cygnusx-3106
    @cygnusx-310610 ай бұрын

    The best aircraft for killing friendlies

  • @n3v3rforgott3n9

    @n3v3rforgott3n9

    9 ай бұрын

    Let's examine the crash numbers from the last 10 years. The Army operates about 2,100 UH-60's including the national guard and special operations: >The current Army Acquisition Objective, or AAO, for its UH-60 Black Hawk fleet currently sits at 2,135 aircraft. The Navy has about 550, and the Air Force has about 100. Lets call it a total fleet of about 2,800. There are about 450 V-22's across all variants. Roughly 6.25 times smaller of an overall fleet so the 60's would have to crash 6.25 times more often to make the rate equal. Over the last 10 years, here's how the two airframes compare for accidents: V-22: 7 crashes H-60 : 51 crashes For the 60 to crash less it would have had to keep their number below ~44 So no it is as safe if not safer than most rotorwing aircraft the military uses

  • @harrybaulz666
    @harrybaulz6662 ай бұрын

    It can kill you in so many ways despite this infomercial

  • @neilpuckett359
    @neilpuckett359 Жыл бұрын

    I wonder how much money has been spent in total on this program?

  • @ashbohgan2022
    @ashbohgan20227 ай бұрын

    Only problem is they keep crashing

  • @saulflores8095
    @saulflores8095 Жыл бұрын

    Maybe we should start going for a more budget friendly engine?, like maybe a hubdai or Toyota V4 if possible

  • @Melissa-ot1ig
    @Melissa-ot1ig9 ай бұрын

    BOONDOGGLE

  • @kietTran-fz3uc
    @kietTran-fz3uc Жыл бұрын

    thân máy bay nhật bản đuôi máy vietnam 78

  • @arindamray1985
    @arindamray1985 Жыл бұрын

    INDIA URGENTLY NEEDS V22 OSPREY FROM USA TO COUNTER CHINA

  • @owbrianslender5834
    @owbrianslender5834 Жыл бұрын

    gta online and battlefield 2042 moment lol

  • @user-pq4by2rq9y
    @user-pq4by2rq9y Жыл бұрын

    Still glad that the v280 is now a thing because the air force just grounded the osprey not long ago.

  • @AA-xo9uw

    @AA-xo9uw

    Жыл бұрын

    "the air force just grounded the osprey not long ago."(sic) Temporary grounding that was lifted relatively soon after it was implemented.

  • @n3v3rforgott3n9

    @n3v3rforgott3n9

    9 ай бұрын

    Let's examine the crash numbers from the last 10 years. The Army operates about 2,100 UH-60's including the national guard and special operations: >The current Army Acquisition Objective, or AAO, for its UH-60 Black Hawk fleet currently sits at 2,135 aircraft. The Navy has about 550, and the Air Force has about 100. Lets call it a total fleet of about 2,800. There are about 450 V-22's across all variants. Roughly 6.25 times smaller of an overall fleet so the 60's would have to crash 6.25 times more often to make the rate equal. Over the last 10 years, here's how the two airframes compare for accidents: V-22: 7 crashes H-60 : 51 crashes For the 60 to crash less it would have had to keep their number below ~44 So no it is as safe if not safer than most rotorwing aircraft the military uses

  • @queenfry7634
    @queenfry7634 Жыл бұрын

    real life vertibird from fallout

  • @IamKried
    @IamKried Жыл бұрын

    Day 3 of returning to US military news

  • @nigelkhan9278
    @nigelkhan9278 Жыл бұрын

    To many of my brothers have been killed in this flying coffin. CH-53 was older and a God sent. Semper FI.

  • @TacticalThib

    @TacticalThib

    Жыл бұрын

    Amen brother whoaoooa

  • @michaelwilliams9574

    @michaelwilliams9574

    Жыл бұрын

    Well, the Ch-53 is on its way out. This is the next generation. Sorry about your loss buddy but, this is the future and it is easy to see why.

  • @AA-xo9uw

    @AA-xo9uw

    Жыл бұрын

    @@michaelwilliams9574 "Well, the Ch-53 is on its way out."(sic) Incorrect. CH-53K just achieved IOC.

  • @bigchungus1848

    @bigchungus1848

    Жыл бұрын

    @@michaelwilliams9574 *Laughs in The King*

  • @nigelkhan9278

    @nigelkhan9278

    Жыл бұрын

    @@michaelwilliams9574 No, Actually the CH-53K King Stallion is replacing the Super Stallion.

  • @jayeshyeole3444
    @jayeshyeole3444 Жыл бұрын

    India & US Collebration Defense & Space Sector Joint Partnership Development Next Generation Stelth Helicopter Stetlh Nuclear Ataack Submarines , Stelth Frigeds Stelth Warship Stelth Bombers

  • @kevinbeattie7297
    @kevinbeattie7297 Жыл бұрын

    Little did they know it’s primary function would be 10 year olds greefing gta online lobbies 😅

Келесі