I am sorry, I appear to have made a mistake, there was in fact a war between the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and the Russians in 1792 (not sure how I missed that), so that one was a failure as well!

@danielsantiagourtado3430

Жыл бұрын

Got it man! Incredible video nonetheless, You rock!

@WhatHadHappened_

Жыл бұрын

It was the time when Moscals took PLC land with other 2 empires

@snomcultist189

Жыл бұрын

I will revive the Hittite empire and declare war on aegypt

@arnalluscaroli451

Жыл бұрын

Fret not! The video was crystal clear and it actually showed all the possible ways a perpetual peace is enforced stricto sensu whilst searching for all the possible results in the query, so it's a win-win situation!

@nicolausg7058

Жыл бұрын

Yes, it was a war, about the 3rd May Constitution. Some spoiled magnats didn't liked the ideas of modernity and reforms, so they started a Targowica Confederacy, which called Russia for help. It was also the same war, where Polish War Order Virtutti Militari was created, by the Stanisław August Poniatowski, to honour victory of his much more talented nephiew - General-Major Józef Poniatowski. It was first Major Victory from the Sobieski's times. First victory, in the End of Times. But i think that that "Eternal Peace" between Russia and Poland was not succesfull. Russians fought in many wars on polish lands, like in the Northern War, or the 7 years war, where both Russians and Prussians were fighting on Polish lands, and devastating them during marches, as any other army of the XVIII century was doing, despite polish neutrality. In elections of August III and Poniatowski, russian troops were present at the Elective Sejm, and literaly were taking polish main legislative body hostage. Do not foregt also the Bar Confederacy, in 1768-1772, where most of the nobles got so much sick of russians, so they decided to kick them out of Poland. One of thier leaders was the Kazimierz Pułaski, or Casimir Pulaski how Americans know him. It was a regular war, that took place on the polish lands again. All of the partitions were backed up by russian military. So despite "no war" in theory, in practice it was an infringement of peace treaty, and even by the XVIII century standards, it was a clear breach.

A 50% success rate maybe the most greatest achievment by humans in diplomacy ever.

@villagernewsletter3577

Жыл бұрын

That’s a bit too lenient tbh, yall humans aren’t peaceful at all, always so greedy (hmmm) Edit: I mean for the whole of diplomacy, not perpetual/eternal peace

@demilembias2527

Жыл бұрын

We did a pretty good job stopping nuclear war so far, especially in the modern world, 80 years is quite a long span of time.

@shubhanjalshukla3879

Жыл бұрын

@@demilembias2527 yet...

@villagernewsletter3577

Жыл бұрын

@@demilembias2527 yes, the mad philosophy and mentality stopped that, survival of the species is more important than increasing territory or influence or interests or spreading an ideology to an enemy

@demilembias2527

Жыл бұрын

@@villagernewsletter3577 doesn't stop even people in modern America fearmongering and trying their hardest to manufacture consent for a war with China, despite China and America in no way posing existential threats to each other, and a war between the two in fact posing a great existential threat to both.

"Eternal peace" between Russia and Poland always sounded like a bad joke to me during history lessons

@ElzariusUnity

Жыл бұрын

Spirit vs Word. *3+ players PvP boardgames flashbacks*

@pawelsmok9905

Жыл бұрын

Because it is XD

@chujciwdupe5786

6 күн бұрын

🇷🇺🤝🇵🇱

the Polish-Russian treaty lasted till 1792 since that year the Polish-Russian War of 1792 broke out due to the Polish 3 May Constitution and it result in the Second Partition of Poland. But overall great video

@possiblehistory

Жыл бұрын

You are absolutely right, my bad, not sure how I missed that one

@strant930

Жыл бұрын

Don't forget about russian intervention in 1733 during the convocation sejm

The Hittite-Egyptian peace treaty lasted 69 years, only ending by outside factors. Nice.

@concept5631

Жыл бұрын

Let me know when this comment gets 69 likes so I can add a like to it

@gg_plays7647

Жыл бұрын

@@concept5631 its 69 likes

@concept5631

Жыл бұрын

@@gg_plays7647 *49

@gg_plays7647

Жыл бұрын

@@concept5631 *🤓

@awesomebearaudiobooks

Жыл бұрын

@@concept5631 It's at 66 likes now

I'd be curious to see a look at the relative power, both millitary and economic of european entities since the 1200's. Was france almost always twice the population of it's nearest competitors? How did the habsburgs compare demographically?

@possiblehistory

Жыл бұрын

Absolutely love that idea, will look into it!

@konradvonschnitzeldorf6506

Жыл бұрын

The Haabsburgs basically managed to keep up anti french alliances for a few hundred years. At least that's what Im thinking from the top of my head.

@jackcross4895

Жыл бұрын

Read Capital in the 21st century

"If the Entente Cordiale counts as a treaty for perpetual peace, it has, for now, succeeded." For now (menacingly)....

Great video man! I assure you i wasnt sick of you saying Perpetual Peace over and over!😊 Speaking of treaties: What if Henry V survived to ensure the Treaty of Troyes was honored and the Anglo-Franco kingdom was born?

You could argue the entente cordiale did fail during ww2. In ww2, France was split between vichy France and free France. Even the British recognised vichy France, but this didn't stop Britain attacking vichy French ships and invading vichy French colonies such as Syria.

@Yuhyuhmuhmuh

Жыл бұрын

Ehhhhhhh, at best you could call it a civil war, but really Vichy was just a puppet government

@masonhandforth1369

Жыл бұрын

But we can argue that it a different regime.

@Yuhyuhmuhmuh

Жыл бұрын

@@masonhandforth1369 why does that make it a legitimate government? Why should that government be considered part of France?

@jakubpociecha8819

11 ай бұрын

Then again, we can't forget about Free France

@jgr7487

10 ай бұрын

the UK was defending the territorial integrity of the French Republic it considered to be the rightful successor to the 3rd French Republic.

An other failed one is the Hungarian-Yugoslav Treaty of Eternal Friendship. One of it's three points was literally "Permanent peace and eternal friendship will exist between the Kingdom of Hungary and the Kingdom of Yugoslavia." It was signed in December, 1940. Not quite four months later, in April, 1941 Hungary joined Germany and Italy in the invasion of Yugoslavia. It was one of the most dishonorable moment of our history, and Prime Minister Pál Teleki committed suicide because he could not talk Regent Miklós Horthy out of the decision. Of course, if we want to be really technical, the Independent State of Croatia was created on April 10, and the Hungarian troops joined the invasion on April 11, so some historian argue that Hungary never really inveded the Kingdom of Yugoslavia (which country had signed the treaty)... but Yugoslavia officially capitulated only on the 17th, so its a really weak argument.

You could have mentioned the Treaty of Windsor (1386) and the Anglo-Portuguese Alliance, with the former being considered the cornerstone of relations between Portugal and England/ Great Britain/ The UK ever since

@TAKE_BACK_BRITAIN

Жыл бұрын

That’s not really a treaty of perpetual peace though because they never really went to war with each other in the first place

@sasi5841

Жыл бұрын

A one sided relationship where portugal held up their end of the bargain but Britain didn't

@Sceptonic

11 ай бұрын

​@@sasi5841 The Pink Map

@sasi5841

11 ай бұрын

@@Sceptonic what?

@kermitthethinker1465

11 ай бұрын

But Portugal and England were technically never at war,so it isn't a perpetual peace treaty.

Dude I'm so glad I found your channel, Watching your videos gives me the same feeling of when I was first getting into history.

If only those treaties worked man. Peace is such a crucial part on maintaining a stable state.😢😢

@psgamer-il2pt

Жыл бұрын

True but sometimes war is better then peace

@papalol1327

Жыл бұрын

​@@psgamer-il2pt el estadounidense menos beligerante:

@psgamer-il2pt

Жыл бұрын

​@@papalol1327 I am Australian

@AndrewVasirov

Жыл бұрын

Sadly wars are now fought to divert attention from internal issues and unite the people against a common enemy.

@concept5631

Жыл бұрын

​@@psgamer-il2pt 🤨🤨🤨

I'd love to see more Roman althistory, especially on Justinian. Perhaps a more realistic althistory of the conflicts he had with the west and east.

Great video 👌 but I feel like the Baqt between muslim Egypt and christian Nubia should have been mentioned too. It lasted almost 700 years, possibly the longest lasting treaty in history.

Well, Gandhi (from Civilization) knows that perpetual peace is only possible when all that is left from your enemies is radioactive ash.

Technically, the 1904 treaty between Britain and France was perpetual since the Third French Republic that signed it was ended by the Nazis in 1940. The French resistance and their oversees colonies then became a new entity (Free France and the France Fourth French Republic after WW2) under Charles De Gaulle.

The Entente cordiale from it's track record to it's raison d'etre (primary contemporary objectives) is one of the most resilient and successful diplomatic agreement/understanding of modern ages. (Through some very conflictual times, diverging and even competing interests at times)

You should make a video on how the Polish -Lithuanian commonwealth could have possibly survived (at least in some capacity) until the modern day. Obviously you would need to start from years before it came into being, but i think with a bit more political common sense, it could have survived, provided the Soviets kept it as its own individual SSR and didn't split it up.

Whoooooo love this

Hey possible History. Another great video! Do you know if it is possible to find a full text of the Ewiger Landsfrieden anywhere? I would love to give it a read

Can you make a video on what if Richard the lionheart survived surprisingly There's not a single alternate history video about Richard the lionheart on what if he survived, which is surprising since if he survived, a lot of history would have changed

@concept5631

Жыл бұрын

Interesting

@TAKE_BACK_BRITAIN

Жыл бұрын

Honestly I don’t think that much would’ve changed. If he survived then the Angevins would’ve held their possessions in France for much longer. But he still likely would’ve never had legitimate children, and Philip of France was younger than Richard and therefore would’ve likely outlived him anyway and even if not so, then I’m sure his son would’ve still reconquered France during John’s reign and John probably would’ve still signed the Magna Carta as a result. So all it really would do is prolong the inevitable. But feel free to make points against what I said, I’m actually genuinely curious as to why you think otherwise.

@Ninjaluga

Жыл бұрын

Top much of a change and way too unpredictable

Love ur vids :). I had an idea for an alternate history scenario as well, What if Austria took Bavaria instead of Lombardy-Venetia in the congress of Vienna?

@stekra3159

Жыл бұрын

It woud no longer be the austria we konow and the baveryens woud grauch about it.

@fiendgaming9120

Жыл бұрын

@@stekra3159 Well I was mostly interested in the effects that would happen during and after the 1848 revolutions as Austria is (most likely) not at war with Lombary and they have far more germans in their empire, so ethnic tension may be reduced and they can start assimilating similar groups like the Czechs

@GAarcher

Жыл бұрын

Took both, diplo wins dude why not get both when the austrians helped so much

What if Ivan the Sixth wasn't usuped ? What if Mary I gave birth to A son ? What if Richard III won the battle of Bosworth ?

Very interesting

9:03 who's gonna tell him he spelt switzerland wrong

@NicolasTheKingphoenix10

Жыл бұрын

Sheisehzbheland

@kokich646

Жыл бұрын

@@NicolasTheKingphoenix10 neironichno shte ti razshirq anusa tolkova kolkoto da moje glavata mi da vleze i da ti lija chervata

"Perpetual peace" You hear the kings and politicians say as they hold out one hand to shake and hold a dagger behind their backs with the other

50%, damn that’s high. Perpetual peace sounded like a fairy tale to me at first and not something that would really happen, like even in this era where we have organizations like the un there are still multiple wars going on in Africa, the Middle East, etc. and ofc the Ukraine one which has been going since 2014 Now I’m thinking of an alt hist scenario where a perpetual peace treaty was signed after ww2…how things would change and all and if it would uphold

@user-cx9nc4pj8w

Жыл бұрын

A lot of the wars in Africa and the middle east are not actually interstate wars, so they don't really count

Thank you

Damn this one’s another hit

In 1941 there was a "Treaty of Eternal Friendship between Yugoslavia and Hungary" which kinda can be considered a treaty of perpetual peace, i probably dont have to say but the treaty didnt last long...

@endreszentgyorgyi5270

10 ай бұрын

Also hungary’s prime minister killed himself when germany told him that they were going to invade. He didn’t want to be considered an oathbreaker so he killed himself before he befell that indignity.

@talesferreiralimadossantos8806

4 ай бұрын

But didn't Hungary have clains in territories like Vojvodina?

what with "The Eternal Peace Treaty" ("Wieczysty Pokój" in polish) (between plc and ottoman empire signed in 1533)

Nice

We might need a new global treaty of perpetual Peace.

@mrsillytacos

Жыл бұрын

Not gonna happen soon with the Middle East and all that.

@concept5631

Жыл бұрын

It might actually be more feisable in the 21st century

Could you do a video about what if Germany from 1939, suddenly, teleported to the world of 1914?

I'm not sure if there's a proposition of "eternal peace", but it's worth to mention the almost millennia of friedly relations between England and Portugal. Maybe a video about alliances could look at it.

The first time I have ever heard of this kind of treaty was from Episode 1 of the Tudors

1:50 Assyria! Woo!

Bahrain and the Uk also signed one

I just can't imagine those diplomats doing anything else than laughing when signing those treaties

This has the same energy as "The war to end all wars" LMAOOOOOO!

Now I want to know what would happen if the entente cordial never was made

What if vampires were real I have been asking every single Alternate history creator Since at least 2014 for this can someone deliver

@johnpyefinch3454

Жыл бұрын

what kind of vampires and should vampires be explained by magic or genetics as a mutation.

Hope it’s good

In my opinion, the partitions meant aggression, illegal aggression and the dismantling of the Polish-Lithuanian State. Therefore, the treaty was a failure. Now, can I have your body pillow?

Sad congress of vienna noices

I have a suggestion:- What if Prussia & Austria joined Crimean War? (possibly making the war go global)

What if the Visagoths became a Sassanid protectorate/client state ?

Man I wish the world had perpetual peace

Let's not forget that an important element here is the resumè ! For example : had the eastern Roman empire not been a hypocritical fickle ally more than several times in the past the Sassanid Persians would not have straight up disregarded the perpetual peace treaty as yet another Roman ruse to buy time while gaining power and invade... A similar case happened again and again throughout the history of diplomacy You get the idea

What about the treaty of universal and perpetual peace signed at the clothe of gold at Calais?

10:57 What happened to that map?

Question, wasn’t the Battle of Kadesh the battle that had the largest chariots involved?

What if the entente cordial failed?

@Aahmpower

Жыл бұрын

The British Empire stays neutral during WW1, maybe

@Aureus07

5 ай бұрын

​@@Aahmpowerwhile leaning towards the entente before Britain only joined ww1 because the Germans invaded Belgium who was friends with Britain the Germans would still do that meaning Britain which still get dragged in

The words "perpetual peace" just scream duplicity of the Persian Shahanshah Kosro.

What about the Helsinki accords those worked for a while until 🇷🇺

What about portugal and britain?

I like that you don't count the French Republic as the same as the Kingdom of France. Far too many forget how different countries become under different regimes.

what about vichy france in ww2? they were at war with the british

Hi

👍

The Entente Cordiale does not really count in my book, but only because it became a perpetual alliance.

[X] Can not cancel non-aggression pact (This feature is disabled in the game option)

I have a idea from somewhere. What if William Afton was elected president of the United States?

There technically were wars opposing the partitions of Poland, notably, Kosciuszko Uprising, when Kosciuszko and his rebels rebeled against Russia and Prussia during second Partition. The conflict begun with Kosciuszko committing coup d'etate and declaring himself leader of the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth. As such, if recognising Kosciuszko's goverment as proper Polish Lithuanian government, it could be argued that the treaty was broken. Also, even if not accounting for that, all Partition were done by military crossing the borders and proclaiming the annexation. It was still invasion, Polish government simply didn't fight back. So, I would argued it still broke the treaty.

Why did you use the aramean flag for the hittites?

I want to learn more about these mysterious sea-raiders

@MakriaMicronation

8 ай бұрын

No one knows about them lol

I thought maurice and khosrow II signed a perpetual peace that ended in 602 during the byzantine sassanian war that destroyed both empires?

Within 9 hours!

You missed the treaty between Portugal and England.

Humanity: Okay, with this we shall have peace. Also Humanity: Let’s throw down

Yo this is absolutely silly but what if Napoleon was American, prussian, british or Russian either one really it would be interesting to see how his approach to war would be with these different circumstances

What if queen Victoria was alive in ww1? Would she had prevented WW1?

Damn, so sign ab eternal peace deal with France, it has a really high success rate

What if Islamic Renaissance/ golden age continued??

What if Sweden won the great northern War.

Congress of Vienna?????

Scotland and England did go to war even after the two kingdoms had been dynastically united by the Stuarts, during the English civil war.

Isnt every peace treaty a perpetual peace treaty? If it had a deadline, we'd a call it a truce or a ceasefire

What if Elagabalus was able to convert the whole Roman empire to his cult

There was a treaty of perpetual peace between Henry VIII and Francis I of France that failed.

Within 13,600 views!

If Byzantium won against the ottomans and/or seljuks

Idea: What if by some miracle, the Byzantine under Heraclius manage to beat back the Muslim invasion ?

A

No Ottoman Polish?

What if the Von Habsburgs were Protestant?

Regarding Poland... I'd say the treaty worked. War happens when politics broke down and the war was avoided. Violence was done to the state and people of Poland, but the polish people still exist.

@BB-mi3vh

Жыл бұрын

Only because they exist ist does not mean that it has worked.

@BB-mi3vh

Жыл бұрын

It*

@Radonatorr

Жыл бұрын

Giving the policy of cultural Russification imposed by the Russian Empire on Poland after the Partitions, which was a consious attmept of the Tsars at marginalizing, persecuting and ideally elliminating Polish language, culture, identity and the Catholic faith, the fact that Polish People still exist is not a result of a successful Treaty of Perpetual Peace. Rather it's the result of Polish ressistance and result of the failure of Russian anti-Polish policies enforced after they broke the Treaty (there actually was a Polish-Russian war in 1792).

@BiggestCorvid

Жыл бұрын

@@Radonatorr yeah, it's impossible to know how things would have gone if Poland refused to go down without a fight. The partition of Poland is what happens when the leaders of the country have no interest in protecting their own people. Petty lords who would rather work for themselves. The same sort of things we see today. Leaders need to be accountable

@Radonatorr

Жыл бұрын

@@BiggestCorvid That's quite simplistic point of view. The corruption among the szlachta nobility, breakdown of the political system and long decline of the state were for sure main reasons for the fall of PLC. But the last king of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, Stanisław II August, did actively try to improve the situation in the country in the aftermath of the 1st Partition. He worked hard to reform and strenghten the state. He was the main brain behind the Commission of National Education, the first such institution in the world as well as the Constitution of the 3rd May which was the first constitution in Europe and second one in the world. There were quite a few notable leaders in the Polish political, cultural and military sectors that supported his attempts. And exactly the fact that there were people in Poland trying with success to make things better was a threat to Russia, Prussia and Austria which made them invade and conduct the remaining 2 Partitions. The official reason why Russians invaded Poland in 1792 was to abolish the new Polish constitution and political system. So paradoxically the reason for Poland's death was Poland's attempts to reform and save itself.

United States - United Kingdom (You missed it)

@johnpyefinch3454

Жыл бұрын

1812?

@Cincinnatiball

Жыл бұрын

@@johnpyefinch3454 yep

Hey just fyi its switZerland

Possible History How will you think the vietnam war would have play out it the U.S was communists? would the U.S still join the war but helping north vietnam instead? if so will the war last just 1 year or will it lasted 10 year like in our timeline? would The British and the French support south vietnam in this scenario and possibly even send they troop to south vietnam?

Does NATO count?

what if the greek plan worked

7:56 As an Ukrainian, I strongly ask you to not show Crimea as a part of Russia. Doing so you legitimate the military occupation. If your point was about "de-facto" control, why wouldn't you paint all of occupied Ukrainian territory under Russian military? I mean, it has the same status as Crimea: 1. Captured by force 2. A part of Russia according to their laws 3. Had a fake referendum 4. Isn't recognised by the rest of the world (except for freak countries, such as Syria or North Korea). Thank you♥️

@obamajoker7166

Жыл бұрын

what's a fric country?

@randomguy6152

Жыл бұрын

​@@obamajoker7166 a country allied with anyone besides america

@nikolai7218

Жыл бұрын

You’re never getting crimea back

@dakefasso9124

Жыл бұрын

@@nikolai7218, time will tell

@epiccrusadr8583

Жыл бұрын

Nah it right fully belongs to the golden horde 💪

Ummm... I hate to spoil your enthusiasm about the russo-polish treaty but what about the polish-russian war of 1792?

12:21 Sovereign Kosovo Turkish north cyprus Russian Crimea At least we cant see Israel / Palestine lol

wee😊

Yes, but how do I build my modern right wing world view around these selective events?

@Vitorruy1

Жыл бұрын

no cultural war points to be earned here sadly :(

0

ag