I own an 'evolution of the Silly Walk' shirt based on the Monty Python skit. A coworker of mine saw it, approached me and proclaimed, "Not everyone believes in that you know." I just nodded in mute amazement.

@NorthernGuard24

10 жыл бұрын

***** RIP Last words "Not everyone believes in..." Reason of death: Stone to the head

@ihaveagun22

10 жыл бұрын

***** aaaaaahhhhhhhkkkkkkkkhhhhhhhh

@micheal89edwards

10 жыл бұрын

I would of ran around screaming blaspheme and calling 'said' person a heathen that or say I can't believe you're that stupid but none the less its a fact just like the theory of evolution.

@Deuphus

10 жыл бұрын

***** Perhaps about evolution, but topping that regarding astronomy, in 1991 I setup some filtered telescopes at work to observe the solar eclipse. A co-worker asked me if the dark spots on the sun were lakes or oceans.

@EntropyVX

10 жыл бұрын

Heyu Deuphus I would have said yes. :)

I think the photo is meant to be poetic, more than scientific.

@ingaman

10 жыл бұрын

Agreed, but it also happens to be why a lot of creationists get confused by evolution... and I say this being a former creationist who once thought this image was an accurate depiction.

@rebellucy5098

10 жыл бұрын

ingaman That and some "scientists" get confused thinking that its an accurate depiction.

@Andytlp

10 жыл бұрын

ingaman Welcome to the world of the real.

@Hugh.Manatee

10 жыл бұрын

ingaman Not only should it not be taken literally, it doesn't try to depict evolution. It was an attempt to capture the human lineage 'from ape to man' in a comprehensive graphic. And, with the knowledge available at the time, it was fairly accurate and clearly spoke to people's imaginations. I think Hank is nit-picking a little on this one; the lack of females makes sense if you're back-tracking along a patrilineal line (as modern geneticists like to do), or if you just realise that women were still second class citizens in those days. While evolution is a branching tree, the lineage leading up to modern man is a line, or, if you want to be complete; a tree growing back in time, with more ancestors the further you go back. The dead ends, while interesting from a paleoanthropologic point of view don't belong in the picture. Theoretically it would be possible to create a line from your father to his father, to his father's father, and so on until you reach the most recent ancestor whose descendants also include chimps and if you take a sample every ten to hundred millennia, you would get a line-up similar to this picture. Sure, some of the species named are now known not to be on that list, but such is the nature of scientific progeress; much of what we now 'know' to be true will draw bemused smiles when the next century rolls by. Sorry for the rant =) TLDR: it's not as inaccurate as Hank makes it out to be.

@ilovetheusers

10 жыл бұрын

ingaman This is exactly one of the major hurdles that I have faced when trying to explain evolution to people. It really makes things that much harder.

I speculated on this in my 5th science class and I somehow offended my science teacher by calling The March of Progress image oversimplified bullshit.

@christopherkeehn9962

7 жыл бұрын

You should show them the video instead then.

@aegonii8471

7 жыл бұрын

Savage

@kapaderos4983

7 жыл бұрын

you cant teach a teacher its against the rules of honor, a %&!·$ child cant know better than a elder! and so on

@KnakuanaRka

7 жыл бұрын

teabing No, what the 99.9% means is that there is less than a 1/1000 chance that an individual pathogen will not be killed.

@bigwheeler2807

4 жыл бұрын

I wouldn’t be offended i would be sad

1:40 You could try breaking the chopstick in half. That would be Asexual reproduction.

@UnknownUser314159

7 жыл бұрын

Well played

@bhadbhris

7 жыл бұрын

Are you saying I gotta slice my willy?

@bjornironside1147

7 жыл бұрын

Poppy Popper fuck i hope not, i wouldn't have something big enough to cut it. plus, i like having a dick

@vivientakacs5599

6 жыл бұрын

Lol

@jesusdiazzz6369

5 жыл бұрын

animals do not produce asexual

Thanks for covering this, Hank! :)

This is my, like, 30th episode in a row. SciShow, I have other shit to do - please let me go.

@jakkob5488

8 жыл бұрын

Same. I have an event to attend in like, 30 minutes...

@AlexandraMoraru92

8 жыл бұрын

+s3dchr I literally LOL'ed at this comment because I've been at it for the past 4 hours.

@sohailahmed1351

8 жыл бұрын

I for about 6 hours

@s3dchr

8 жыл бұрын

Sohail Ahmed Oh my god, why'd you comment and remind me of this show? Now I have to watch more, YOU'VE DOOMED ME

@rizzla092

2 жыл бұрын

@@AlexandraMoraru92 LOLED

See a very intelligent video. Scroll down and see some fuckin' stupid comments...

@pewdiepieamazing3776

10 жыл бұрын

amen.

@ninjalemurdude

10 жыл бұрын

***** Blindly believing in something so strongly with little evidence to it happening is considered stupid among many people in the scientific community. It does sound pretty silly when it's explained like that, doesn't it? At the same time, blindly believing it's not possible simply because it hasn't been proven is equally stupid. Many people just don't realize that. In the end, it's your choice. I do, however, get annoyed when people say they don't believe in evolution because of their religion.

@ninjalemurdude

10 жыл бұрын

***** I said little evidence, not zero evidence. There is about as much evidence supporting the bible as there is supporting that The Odyssey, The Iliad, and many other Greek legends actually happened. Evidence that some of the people are real, some of the locations are real, and even some of the objects are real does not prove that the stories are real. Evolution on the other hand has essentially been proven.

@ninjalemurdude

10 жыл бұрын

***** Well evidence is everywhere for both, but you could say there is more "missing links" in creationism. I guess it doesn't matter though...

@blindwatchmaker7842

10 жыл бұрын

***** The word "evolutionism" does not exist, it was made up by religious apologists (mostly fundamentalist Christians) in a failed attempt to put both ways of thinking in the same level.

How to eat sushi with just one chopstick: - Put down the chopstick. - Eat the sushi with your hands. - Yum!

@masansr

10 жыл бұрын

How is that even related?

@CygnusExOne

10 жыл бұрын

masansr "Teaching the history of our development with just one sex is trying to eat sushi with just one chopstick." It's paraphrased from about 1:40 and on-wards, from this very video. :)

@CygnusExOne

10 жыл бұрын

***** Dude. Harsh. Think of the chef who lovingly prepared this fine meal for you... and you just run it through? Prepare for culinary retribution.

@AnthroGuitarist

10 жыл бұрын

Milewide Just break the chopstick into two two pieces and use those as two, even though you're only using one. u mad, bro?

@CygnusExOne

10 жыл бұрын

***** Haha. That's one way to do it. Kind of defeats the purpose of chopsticks though, don't it? Removes all the leverage. You'll basically be eating with your hands but with pieces of wood in the way. Risk of choking? Possible.

Thanks for talking about evolution.

@sa_0515

3 жыл бұрын

Ulan efe buralara da mı görecektin seni aslanparçası, sen evinin tadiltını bitir sonra izlersin şekerim :)

@superturka

3 жыл бұрын

Fasist efe zorla propaganda yaptiriyor

@asude1

3 жыл бұрын

@@superturka Aynen gerçekten çok şaşırdım :D Bunları izleyen Türklerin olması güzel.

@fieldnegro4684

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah I think the evolution never happen..they just found defect human being fossil from doing an incest for a long-long generations till they becomes apes.

I am offensive and I found it American

@nexuswolf780

6 жыл бұрын

Hello offensive. I'm Dad.

@bethbartlett5692

5 жыл бұрын

"?" and -

@altareggo

5 жыл бұрын

lol i see what you did there....

watching this with my super christian grandparents in the same room... livin life on the edge

@stuffynosepatrol

5 жыл бұрын

Lol

@Michael-Archonaeus

5 жыл бұрын

Just keep in mind that evolution is only one interpretation of the evidence :)

@lifebeforedeath1788

5 жыл бұрын

Michael what’s the other one?

@hayk3000

5 жыл бұрын

PUSH IT TO THE LIMIT

@lifebeforedeath1788

5 жыл бұрын

hayk3000 WALKING ON A RAZOR’S EDGE

I continue to be amazed by how great/well done these episodes are! On point, intellectually stimulating, and objectively unbiased, this show makes the best sales pitch for the scientific mindset!

People assume that evolution is a strict progression of species to species, but *actually* from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly... evolution-y wevolution-y... stuff.

@ChocolateTeapot93

10 жыл бұрын

Best comment on the internet

@dereenaldoambun9158

6 жыл бұрын

Fawksthephoenix1 Well said old comment.

@yusufpatel6774

5 жыл бұрын

Is that Doctor Who reference?

@annamouse179

5 жыл бұрын

@@yusufpatel6774 absolutely

@starrikiru

4 жыл бұрын

thats all i could think when he said that!!!!!

"Evolution isn't a linear process, it does not turn one species into another into another. It's really about genetics" Thanks for that, and this is really logical and makes sense. People tend to think that we evolved from another species, which I really had doubts about and had similar thoughts to yours. Thanks

@Luka1180

4 жыл бұрын

What. But... we did evolve from another species. But there was also interbreeding involved in some cases, but only with species that evolved from common ancestors on divergent evolutionary paths, which allowed us to both be "cousins" of some extinct species, and descended from them.

@freandwhickquest

3 жыл бұрын

@Miss Plumtree Miss Plumtree evolution says that humans and chimpanzees share a common ancestor. We didn't evolve from chimps, chimps didn't evolve from us we just evolved from two different populations of an ape-like species. Two populations of that species evolved into different directions, one eventually became humans other eventually became Pan. Pan lineage also diverged into two groups recently: bonono and common chimpanzee. Human lineage also split into various archaic hominins like neanderthals, denisovans etc. Sapiens is the only surviving species in our lineage.

@freandwhickquest

3 жыл бұрын

@Miss Plumtree Miss Plumtree hmm. Why do you think it's ridiculous pls explain your feelings.

@freandwhickquest

3 жыл бұрын

@Miss Plumtree Miss Plumtree the picture you draw indeed seems absurd to me. i would reject evolution if it actually said that, but it doesn't. legs didn't evolve until cambrian era long long after the first multicellular organisms evolve. first multicellular organisms didn't have legs or organs, they were like advanced colonies which some cells are specialized into different types. no microorganism ever gave birth into an animal with legs. we are talking about hundreds of millions of year progression with each step is more complex than before.

@freandwhickquest

3 жыл бұрын

​@Miss Plumtree Miss Plumtree but it was no longer a bacteria when the creature got its legs. it was an early bilaterally symetrical worm-like primitive animal who first got its legs. mutations slightly alter the body plan in different ways, the mutations that help the mobility selected in each generation until some small appandages evolve into legs. first animals also evolve from very advanced single celled eukaryots called proto-zoons. (not fromthose bacteria we see in current world)

I know most of us have the common sense to comprehend everything we just watched, but considering there are so many misconceptions about evolution... I'm glad for the nit-picking

Does that mean Neanderthals were the first species that went extinct because of humans?

@killerbee2562

10 жыл бұрын

Depends on if you consider neanderthals "human"

@randoemgmr

10 жыл бұрын

killerbee256 Read that comment again...

@ductuslupus87

10 жыл бұрын

Neanderthals ARE humans.

@ppp9922

10 жыл бұрын

randoemgmr i think he means that if you do consider them humans then they aren't extinct.

@eliparker7151

10 жыл бұрын

***** Did you even watch the video

1:42 - "... there's going to be alot of stabbing."

I am grateful for this subject being discussed in the way you've delivered it. Very useful.

the amount of people who are stating " IF WE EVOLVED FROM MONKEYS THEN WHY ARE THEIR STILL MONKEYS?!" is really quite sad and pathetic.

@arousedsquirrel2429

8 жыл бұрын

+Chi Like looking down on retards.

@MechanicsStudents

8 жыл бұрын

Get off your high horse pal, and stop being a douche.

@nathanialweiss7496

8 жыл бұрын

Natural selection and our environment affects our phenotype

@DonnyDealer

8 жыл бұрын

It has nothing to do with looking down on others or riding a high horse. The fact is that the people who make that statement do so from a place of ignorance. Meaning that they have not even attempted to try and understand evolution, and yet attempt to argue against it. Which is, in fact, really quite sad and pathetic. As are many of you for bashing his stance against those kinds of people who are holding us back intellectually.

@DonnyDealer

8 жыл бұрын

***** Nobody here called all Christians retards so what the fuck is your point?

Seriously. Did the "first, second, etc" thing just suddenly get popular again? Dafuq is wrong with people.

@danib577

10 жыл бұрын

You'd be surprised...

@LeLucky90

10 жыл бұрын

Everything is wrong with people.

@FlyingJetpack1

10 жыл бұрын

Back to the old youtube comment section, I never quite missed it. I'm only glad that I won't need to see Bob any time soon.

@kylobite

10 жыл бұрын

Do you honestly think it ever stopped? There will always be that -one guy-.

@Pixelynx

10 жыл бұрын

***** Who knows. Maybe I didn't notice it since they could have been hidden due to negative votes/spam -- which we no longer have any control over. >-

so pokemon lied to me... my childhood is ruined :'('''

@Aureolelegends

10 жыл бұрын

Watch this on KZread: Game Theory: How Pidgey "Proves" Darwinian Evolution"

Isnt it so fun to sit back and read religion vs anti religion comments on every video pertaining to the tiniest reference to science of any nature

@thedoctorwho8011

6 жыл бұрын

Yes very much

@dereenaldoambun9158

6 жыл бұрын

Dan JP Yup.

@minidonut2837

5 жыл бұрын

Yupph and I have religion and that's why I will going to heaven

But...but my pastor said that God made the monkeys and humans so this video is wrong. lolz

Another great episode, but I bet it won't do well in Kansas.

@Aruariaan

10 жыл бұрын

damn creationist! XD

@thirdchild96

10 жыл бұрын

SinCeraaaa come on why can't we all just co-exist? Believe what you believe in let them believe what they believe in. Not all creationists are bad as well as not all non-creationist are. So let us try not to belittle each other....and that would make for a slightly better world.

@artemis3120

10 жыл бұрын

Jehohanan John We can't just co-exist because Creationism teaches a false reality. It is demonstrably wrong, plain and simple. If someone insists on believing the world is flat, even in the face of being proven wrong, I'll belittle them and pity them as I please. Likewise for Creationism.

@ssppeellll

10 жыл бұрын

Jehohanan John I'm with JJ on this one. Belittling does not advance the cause of waking more people out of their misguided fantasies. What we should be doing is talking like scientists--using reason, not insulting terms or sarcasm. And to those who would say, "They won't listen to reason", I say this: Some will. If some are a lost cause, so be it. But don't push away those who still have a chance of seeing the light by being unpleasant.

@TheDajamster

10 жыл бұрын

Part of the problem is perspective. A lot of them think that the earth is only a few thousand years old. If I believed that, then yeah, evolution would seem like so much crazy talk. Millions of years are kinda hard to wrap your head around.

Two suggestions: first an episode about cats. There's not enough cat videos on the Internet yet, we need more. And then an episode about Intersex-people.

So you're telling me evolution isn't a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - it's more like a big ball of wibbly, wobbly, timey, wimey stuff?

@jakkob5488

8 жыл бұрын

Kek.

@joshtony6997

8 жыл бұрын

+Em A Viking dr.who ...cool

@backtothefutureman1

8 жыл бұрын

+Em A Viking Doctor who quote which is my favorite show.

@orueom7720

8 жыл бұрын

precisely. .. its a load of bullshit sold to people who are told to never question or challenge it. and if they do the darwin gestapo of dawkins and the royal society will destroy your academic career and blurt out your credibility there is a God and nothing will ever change that

@jakkob5488

8 жыл бұрын

Ese Omoru Who said theism and evolutionism aren't compatible, m8?

I should actually be watching my country play in the world cup or making homework right now.... instead I'm binging on science videos and actually learning something in the middle of the night

@TheDrizzle762

10 жыл бұрын

Im with you on that one!

@FelipeV3444

9 жыл бұрын

Isabel Kleijberg Good for you!!

Everything I know about Pokemon is wrong.

@ChocolateTeapot93

10 жыл бұрын

There's actually a video about how pokemon demonstrates evolution. Their point is that all pokemon are derived from mew and have adapted to the different areas they live in which is why they only live in certain regions or routes.

@PurpleChrome391

10 жыл бұрын

Jodie653 Yeah, I know; I was just trying to be clever but, you clearly outshone me. Also, GameTheory has a great video which demonstrates your exact point. You should check it out, if you haven't already.

@ChocolateTeapot93

10 жыл бұрын

That was the video I was talking about haha

@PurpleChrome391

10 жыл бұрын

Jodie653 Great minds think alike.

So basically you're telling me that people assume that evolution is a strict progression of cause to effect. But actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey... stuff.

This is me discovering you Sci show.. There is no doubt that we're going to get on like a house on fire. You have a new fan in me!

I used to also believe in evolution. I didn't have anything else to believe in and the people who taught it seemed really smart. Thankfully my mind has since been changed by the much more compelling and believable evidence of a loving God.

@olskoolsouljah

10 жыл бұрын

Hahahaha....evidence...

@warblizarga

10 жыл бұрын

Ossel fuck off, let him believe what he believes....

@warblizarga

10 жыл бұрын

was not trying to troll... i just really don't like it when one attacks faith or someone who is a religious man or woman attacks scientific thought.

@olskoolsouljah

10 жыл бұрын

allen b I don't necessarily have a problem if someone professes faith (I think they're stupid, but I'm not going to call them out on it). I DO have a problem when someone makes an idiotic statement like "my mind has been changed by the much more compelling and believable evidence of a loving God", because no such evidence exists.

@baddmint

10 жыл бұрын

allen b why are you being hostile. he was just asking for proof of GOD which christians assume that if there is a GOD he sits around all day waiting for them to pray to him so he can help them with something. truth is there may be a GOD but ITS not what you think IT is. yes IT may be a all seeing entity but dose IT care about a meaningless spec in a vast cosmos unlikely. on the other hand science is a proven thing. science cures illness creates technolegy and in a lot of cases allows people to cheat death.

This image isn't appreciated for its accuracy... It is appreciated for its look and the symbolic behind it. Only those who don't really care would be shocked to learn that this depiction of human evolution isn't accurate...

@D3sertst0rm

10 жыл бұрын

My thoughts exactly. What I'm surprised with, is to see people surprised by this...

@JogInTheFog

10 жыл бұрын

I think the real problem with the image is that for many people, especially those who look for any excuse to discount evolution, it appears to depict evolution as that "march toward progress" which would of course imply design.

@MasterAsra

10 жыл бұрын

The problem is that people actually take it as 100% authentic and what evolution looks like. Especially those who don't know any better, which leads to problems in understanding.

"...spreading their jeans all over the place..." Mothers call this "being a teenager".

Really glad you made this. You explained this in such simple concise way. Although I think at school and uni, the curriculum were more of the lumpers rather than splitters as I've never heard of some of those hominins. I need to do more research.

i love how the vid shows, that evolution is NOT an active process - like any species would decide to evolve - but really a result of adapation!! well done :D

You know what would be awesome?? Crash Course Anthropology!!

Make an episode about the psychological reasons behind people liking simplistic stuff so much.

@ForeverTributesNL

10 жыл бұрын

It's because there are many simplistic people.

@readyrepairs

10 жыл бұрын

Contradiction. You are simple, yet I hate you.

the humor expressed in this video, as well as ACTUAL SCIENCE being explained scientifically, has earned you another subscriber

Really, Sir ? The guy who robbed you looked like #2 or #6. You can't decide because they're so much alike ??

Couldn't you poke a sushi roll down the middle with a chopstick to eat it with only one?

@ButterflyScarlet

8 жыл бұрын

You could but there's a chance it would either slip off or just collapse

@zwolfelfen

8 жыл бұрын

Well, in Japan, you shouldn't. I think it's because it's disrespectful, but I could be wrong.

@monkeydetonation

7 жыл бұрын

Wait, no women mean that we shove chopsticks down the middle of the sushi roll..... But then.... That explains why we're called homo sapiens

@NightmirrorXx

7 жыл бұрын

You're not supposed to eat that way with them. They're not like spears, although I did see Jet Li kill someone that way in one of his movies.

@stevenjo3866

7 жыл бұрын

rasiem

It's all so interesting. I'm glad research is always being put into this stuff, it's so important to keep learning! my philosophy class is going to the natural history museum to learn about Darwin and his ideas next term - vvvvvvv excited! (she also called it a school trip so we uni students got very excited to miss a day of lectures! hahaha)

@MrPuppetMan2

10 жыл бұрын

If you're interested in the more genetic biology side of this video (as opposed to the anthropology side), I would reccomend reading Richard Dawkin's The Selfish Gene. It really is a fascinating read.

@JessRushworth

10 жыл бұрын

Nah its a class called Society Thought and Art in Europe. Lots of philosophy :)

@JessRushworth

10 жыл бұрын

Robert Allen we do a lot of science vs religion so it's a bit of fun. Natural history museum London :)

Haters gonna hate. Creationists gonna create. Evolutionists gonna make logical sense and evolve.

Evolutionary talks abound in the internet, and though many times hours and countless slides by biologists, famous ones including, won't give you the entire picture, your less than 4 minutes presentation is superbly comprehensive. Bravo.

WHAT? and where are Adam and Eve ?!?!?! ( Just kidding LOL)

Huh! I've never heard about this. Thanks, SciShow! :)

I was just scrolling down the comments section and thinking "hey... where are all the crazy religious vs. obnoxious atheist 20-comment-long threads of pointless insults?" and then I remembered the "top comments first" default. Starting to like the new KZread. =)

I've often wondered why creationists don't simply study evolution and learn the facts before they try to present alternatives and/or objections to various scientific conclusions. I suspect the reason is that the moment they do so they will realize that the process of evolution is an observable and verifiable fact of nature.

@1971SuperLead

9 жыл бұрын

***** The atomic theory is not used to contradict Creationism. Yet, Evolution is, which makes not sense since Evolution does not address the origins of life either. This is why i find it so strange that people use Evolution as an argument against Creationism. Now the Creationists who says Evolution can't be true, are also mistaken, because the bible never says that evolution doesn't happen. Both sides of the argument are silly. And never call me an idiot again. ;)

@1971SuperLead

9 жыл бұрын

***** "But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day." First off...I don't even like the bible. I don't endorse it, but because I'm old and inquisitive I know some things about it. Secondly,...the bible is clearly a book filled with stories, fables, mythology, metaphors, parables, etc. It might as well be a book of riddles. You've got to look beyond the surface to learn anything from it. Most people haven't got that kind of time or patience. Thirdly.....God is not subject to time. Time is subject to God. Lastly, who's to say at what stage of evolution those animals were at when God created them? For all we know God's Garden Of Eden was just a bunch of one celled creatures that would later become the birds and fishes we know of today. Again, both side, atheists and creationists are arguing from a point of ignorance. Yawl ain't got a clue what yawl r really arguing about.

@1971SuperLead

9 жыл бұрын

***** Oh Pedro, you haven't done your homework. The truth is that, for many years quantum physicists have been leaning towards a "Fine Tuner". Do your homework. here watch this at least. It's just the tip of the iceberg. There's so much evidence, but you have to open your eyes and look. God isn't going to hit you over the head with evidence. You gotta want it. kzread.info/dash/bejne/rGh5wcSNZMjJl84.html

@DoctorInstrument

9 жыл бұрын

1971SuperLead You don't look for evidence to meet a conclusion. You base the conclusion off the evidence. It doesn't matter what you want.

@1971SuperLead

9 жыл бұрын

DoctorInstrument You do look for evidence to support a hypothesis.

I used to get teased In grade school for believing in evolution. That's Utah for you.

@CrimsonVoid

9 жыл бұрын

Pixel_AgeUSA Wow.

@jamescombs2415

9 жыл бұрын

In Kentucky in my town there are 4 churches and you get punched in the face for being atheist

@CrimsonVoid

9 жыл бұрын

James Combs Sounds like a horrible place to live.

@jamescombs2415

9 жыл бұрын

Dude I live in the middle of nowhere

@CrimsonVoid

9 жыл бұрын

James Combs Makes sense.

I was really hoping Hank would get a Dr Who reference in there. :P

Came to learn about science and stuff Ended up disappointed with the comments section I ought to know better by now

@emeraldemperor2601

4 жыл бұрын

I know, right?

A beautiful idea that is often miss understood, thank you Hank for promoting knowlegde and facts:)

Please can you do a video on the different types of placentas, I'm doing it at uni at the moment and would love one of your great little videos to use for some guilt free KZread revision lol :)

It's pronounced Cro- Manyon. It's French. I think it's only significant because it's one of the oldest humans discovered in Europe.

Hank, can you do an episode on how MANY and which changes we've seen in species since we first started to observe the world scientifically? It'd be cool to see some of that laid out.

@williambell7538

10 жыл бұрын

I have a feeling you'd find this list of observed speciation events interesting: www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html

But how did Jesus ride on dinosaurs?

You made me understood something that none of my teachers ever could. THANK YOU

I love how the creationists are saying that evolution is fake, yet they can't give any evidence themselves that creationism is real

@jebadiahbobson7578

10 жыл бұрын

Really Creationists should not say it is fake. Evolution does not disprove Religon. Evolutionary science started as a way to explain God, and really hasn't ever disproved Religion. The problem is when Atheists start using Evolution as evidence for Atheism.

@fjoa123

10 жыл бұрын

they give all their questions the same answer: God did it. Its pretty efficient in a way. A single answer for all questions?

@rodlurks66

10 жыл бұрын

Ben Harp I would say that science can't disprove God/gods but can disprove claims made by religions about the natural world (for instance that humans did not all descend from 2 people) . A question: are you defining Atheism as the claim "there is no God" ? because lacking belief in gods doesn't require evidence, it's simply not being convinced by the claim that there is such a being.

@raizin4908

10 жыл бұрын

rodlurks66 There is a difference between "absence of belief in god(s)" and "belief in the absence of god(s)." I agree the former does not require evidence, but I think the latter-outright claiming that there is no such thing as a deity in any form or shape-is objectively not fair to claim without evidence. Not to say people are not entitled to belief what they want. The "belief in the absence of god(s)" type atheists have just as much right to have their beliefs as theists do. But I grow tired of such people that claim they are somehow objectively and logically better than theists, when they are much the same in essence. Agnosticism-or staying neutral in the existance versus non-existance of deities debate and not ruling out any of either side-is in my opinion the most objective perspective, and the one that should be used in most science and philosophy in order to not alienate theists and atheists alike. Regardless of the personal beliefs of the reseachers. Woops, that was a bit more of a rant than I intended...

@rodlurks66

10 жыл бұрын

Raizin I agree that gnostic Atheists do give themselves a burden of proof, it is one of the reason I am an agnostic atheist (along with many others), aside from the simple fact that my knowledge is limited. I asked Ben Harp how he was defining Atheism as the majority of Atheists do not hold a hard gnostic position.

This KZread channel is informal an interesting. I saw lots of comments from those who probably should've been attentive in school.

@Mzansi74

10 жыл бұрын

Well put!

You're wrong because Jesus. /s

@18aidanme

10 жыл бұрын

Everyone, just ignore trunkcompany, I think he was an abortion survivor.

@karstengregory8613

10 жыл бұрын

No Black Jesus that's why

@HesterDW

10 жыл бұрын

/s means sarcasm for you internet illiterates.

@cazaba8323

9 жыл бұрын

You have no proof Jesus existed. Just a book. Scientists have physical evidence. Just because it's in your 'book' doesn't make it true.

@LordLemmysLabs

9 жыл бұрын

CaZaBa Actually it's been accepted as historical fact that he existed, was baptized, and that he was indeed crucified by Pontius Pilate, through non Christian historical records. Whether he performed miracles, or rose from his grave is up for debate, but there is definitely historical proof that Jesus once existed in history.

“Oreopithecus which sounds delicious...” lmfao

I had to get one of those mouse pads with the homo-sapien turned around saying "stop following me" which I found pretty comical.

When do we start calling you Hank The Science Guy? Has PBS not called you yet? Discovery? Do we need to start emailing and calling the executives of these networks to get you on there?

@Thutil

10 жыл бұрын

That doesn't rhyme though... Hm... How about Hank Green the Science Machine?

I actually really appreciate the fact that you guy's put that brief mention of the lack of women in the illustration. Well done.

@wendysmemer8829

8 жыл бұрын

I thought it was a stupid point, showing 2 people at a time is less practical, just one or the other

@christheother9088

8 жыл бұрын

It was the 60's, and if kids were going to see it, they could not show anything like a breast in plain view. Notice how carefully the penises where obscured in every drawing. Easier to hide a penis than a breast. So it was a different version of political correctness than the one you are advocating.

@cassidysimmons9494

7 жыл бұрын

+Chris Gonzales but nudity was ok back then especially in movies. boobs were just boobs back then. it's now that seeing boobs is so taboo

@pietandersen6120

7 жыл бұрын

+Chris Gonzales if you do remember, adam and eve actually wore no clothes till they ate the apple and went against gods orders, so true believers should be nudists

@pietandersen6120

7 жыл бұрын

no its true, they stopped being innocent when they ate the apple, which was strictly against god, and until they ate the apple they thought it was fine to be nude so, yeah. im just saying.

Well this guy just denounced all of darwinian evolution

@ptango101

10 жыл бұрын

He told us that the way generally people think evolution happens (because of pictures like that) is for the most part wrong. This is why creationists have such free reign with their strawman arguments. Its easy to deceive people when they don't really know whats going on in the first place.

@GimpCent

10 жыл бұрын

How on earth did you walk away with the idea that this "denounced all of Darwinism evolution"?

@89dragonov

10 жыл бұрын

Suma, what video were you watching? Because it definitely wasn't this one.

@NiveusCornix

10 жыл бұрын

Sumas quite right, Hank took a biased on this i feel.

@ptango101

10 жыл бұрын

NiveusCornix How so? He is just telling us that the picture is misleading.

It is all about divergent points. At what point does something become a new species? We consider so many different varieties of people to be homo-sapiens. If you are 7 feet tall and white or 4 ft tall and black you are still considered one species. The same is true of many of man's recent ancestors. They varied from each other greatly in their appearance but they still are considered the same species. Our understanding of how we evolved and what we evolved from is still changing with new science.

@gildedbear5355

10 жыл бұрын

***** While that it s generally good definition, it fails in some specific situations that actually exist, for instance there are two types of Gulls in Europe, they can not interbreed. However, one can breed with the gulls to the west, who can breed to their west (etc.), and the other can breed with the gulls to the east, who can breed to their east (etc.). This continues all the way around the world till you come back to Europe. It's called a ring species. In contrast, dogs and wolves can interbreed, but we generally consider them separate species. TLDR: While that is a good rough definition, life is way more complex than that.

@killerbee2562

10 жыл бұрын

GildedBear "In contrast, dogs and wolves can interbreed, but we generally consider them separate species" No we don't dogs are considered a sub species of wolves hence the name Canis lupus familiaris. Now wolves and coyotes fit what you said.

@kathic6402

10 жыл бұрын

A Great Dane and a Chihuahua are the same species but that does not mean that if you put them together they would mate. The breeding definition only works so well.

@killerbee2562

10 жыл бұрын

Meshal Alhussaini I sure hope you're trolling, other wise you are one ignorant, indoctrinated son of bitch.

@theflyingcraig9979

10 жыл бұрын

its about genes. all humans have the same base genetic code, just your genes from your parents add to that base.

I remember that book and that chart very well from my childhood. I still have it, as a matter of fact. My parents bought both of the Time/Life Nature and Science series. Looking back, they were an extraordinary asset in my early education. Terribly dated now, alas

@jonb936

10 жыл бұрын

Time Life Corporation is anti GOD, and is brainwashing NWO garbage. I read that garbage too, but now I'm awake to the lies and BS of the satanist that control the world. If you and everyone else want to beat them at their own game learn how to be a man. This is what they fear. Google Karl Lentz.

@scottbilger9294

10 жыл бұрын

Google Louis Leakey

I like how Hank is clear that "evolution" is an ever-changing process rather than a direct line from A to B to C, etc. I find it amazing how the media can pounce on one or two half-truths and go with it to the point it becomes "fact." Thanks for clarifying things, Hank. Keep up the good work.

Amazing, I am a big fan of SciShow! You rock my socks Hank.

so evolution is just a bunch of "wibley wobley timey wimey, stuff"

You should have disabled the cooooments

@JBoyle-jr9wb

9 жыл бұрын

***** if atheists ruled the world, everyone would be at home writing internet comments wining about things other people believe in and nothing would get done in this world.

@JBoyle-jr9wb

9 жыл бұрын

Omer Luxy thats got to be one if the dumbest comments ive ever read. Proves a lot though.

@SomeRandomName999999

9 жыл бұрын

***** I'm an atheist and I don't comment anything about religious shit, but most of the time on the internet I see people with religions trying to shove their beliefs down other people's throats. We atheists won't really give a shit about *your*** beliefs unless *you*** start writing stuff on the bible here on the internet. **And by "you" I'm not talking about you, I'm talking about those people who type ass shit here about how God is our father or whatever. BTW I understand if anyone believes in a God and if you're offended by dis comment plz no h8 :(

@JBoyle-jr9wb

9 жыл бұрын

I want a longer name from what I see, Atheist usually start the debate with a little comment irrelevant to the article....like the one above. If you see a religious post....move on, its not your post. A science post is a science post, just like ive seen those childish inaccurate atheist memes. Like I've said In the past, I dont troll mermaid or unicorn posts and bash them. I cant go 20 minutes on G+ without coming accross some childish sarcastic remark. Yoy guys need to grow up and if you dont believe in God, well....stop thinking about him. There's people on here that spend all day talking and bashing what they dont even believe in. Thats really sad if you break it down. Moms basement is VERY full of hate.

@SomeRandomName999999

9 жыл бұрын

***** You're right I should just ignore these retarded internet debates. I don't believe in God and I don't really think much about him. I won't bother coming up with some "scientific explanation" as to why God doesn't exist but yeah a lot of atheists do that I guess.

lol, oreopithicus sounds dilicious! love this dude

Thank You! I've waited years for someone to finally agree with me and explain, though vaguely, why that particular representation was fallacious.

As an Asian I'll have to tell you that you CAN eat sushi with one chopstick - you stab it.

@brian1185

3 жыл бұрын

As a non-Asian I have to ask can you eat all of it with one chopstick?

Most people here should have paid a little more attention in school. Specially those who question evolution knows close to nothing about it at all or how it works. I guess it's easy to reject what you do not understand or comprehend.

@HighLighterlines

8 жыл бұрын

Is that why you reject God?

@RadioGaGago

8 жыл бұрын

HighLighterlines Which god? Ra? Zeus? Odin? Krishna? Jupiter? Yahweh? Horus? Queztalcoati? Biame? Breged? And how do you reject something that do not exist?

@HighLighterlines

8 жыл бұрын

GutentagCharlie Haha let me give you the answer I gave to someone else. Now about who is the true God. Let's first star with Gods nature. God is the greatest thing imaginable; mind and consciousness is greater than everything non conscious. So, God is a conscious being. Some things are greater than other things. Example in moral philosophy, there are way that are better than others. So, God is the most perfect way of everything, the one you must follow and imitate for success and the true life. That's is why it need to be holy, almighty, perfect in goodness and love and justice and wisdom. There are being whose existence is not necessary but only possible like we find here on earth. Those are call contingent beings. The whole universe is contingent by the way. But everything cannot be contingent for if it is, in the eternity pass it would have cease to exist for all contingent being cease to exist because is not in its nature to exist. So, there must be a necessary being whom is not contingent, it is necessary in itself. Why? To understand that you need to learn the difference between essence and existence. Essence is what makes an object what it is, existence it just its being. In the case of contingent being their essence and existence is different. As I say before is not in their essence to exist. Example, you can think of a robot and make the computer model and everything but that robot don't exist until you or someone construct it into being. Now the robot exist. So in the case of this necessary being its essence is the same as its existence. It exist, he didn't need anyone to make him up, he exist because its in his nature to exist, he is pure being and the source where are the other contingent being in heavens and earth came from. This is God. What other gods fit this description? Well most of them don't. Most of them had a beginning like all the Greek and roman pantheon, the Egyptian and a whole lots of others. This gods also are not the greatest thing, they behave human like and have human qualities. The only god that fit all description is the god of the bible, the true GOD. Now, we have the bible his inspire word that also proof that he is the one true God. In Jesus Christ for example were fulfil over 400 prophecies. All the prophecies of the bible fulfil with time and that is evidence that he is the true God. All the writers and person in the Bible are true historical figures. Moses is a historical figure. He was truly the one selected to liberate Israelites from Egypt the first world power. How a tribe of slave was able to beat a world power in its prime? Well, they didn't, it was Jehovah God that did. Everybody forget this but this is a historical awesome even and a testimony of Gods power. The bible explain human existence since the beginning. Explain the whys. Why do we exist? Why do we die? Why are we in the current condition? What is our purpose? It even explain the true origin of religion and its wide spread lies. The only book that claim comes from the only true God is the Bible. Read the bible and you will understand humanity pass, present and future. You will know that this is the truth . In top of all of that, Jesus Christ, the son of God himself came to earth to save humanity from death, to destroy Satan the head of the rebellion and to restore earth to its rightful place. He came to fulfil all the prophecies and hopes. He proof everything correct. He teach us about God like nobody have done. He perform miracles. His death and resurrection is the final testimony and the strongest one. With no doubt the God and father of Jesus Christ himself is the one and true God.

@RadioGaGago

8 жыл бұрын

HighLighterlines MAN that was a lot of bullcrap. Did not need to read more than the first paragraf to know that though. Nothing made sense. Give me emperical evidence or respectfully gtfo.

@davidgumazon

8 жыл бұрын

GutentagCharlie why dont ask your *Inner Wisdom* not ur current *Knowledge* obviously *Inner Wisdom* is ur Greater-Self you hear ur *Inner Wisdom* sometimes

Dude the intro of Cro-Magnon was so hilarious ! - A rough looking customer.. lol

I just saw an ad of a bear taking a shower.

@ShaudaySmith

8 жыл бұрын

i literally lol'd at this.

@justanothergamer4688

8 жыл бұрын

+Shauday Smith When I came back to this video to reply to you I saw the same ad.

@vifurawa2715

7 жыл бұрын

Lorenzo Martinez Mind=Blown

@colinp2238

6 жыл бұрын

They also use Charmin toilet paper

@jhminton3732

4 жыл бұрын

Lorenzo Martinez same😂😂

What if the Neanderthals didn't die out? Assuming they were sentient, how would living with another sentient specie affect us today as humans in terms of what we look like and our culture, such as prejudice or our understanding of science? Would we benefit because we would be alright with more diversity, and be less prejudice? Or would we form into different groups, with the pure humans prejudice against the pure Neanderthals and vice-versa with both prejudice against the mixtures?

@ethancowgill6142

10 жыл бұрын

What's really incredible is if you were to go back, say, 50,000 years there were Homo Floresiensis, Homo Erectus, Homo neandertalensis, and Homo sapiens all living at the same time. Wow.

@sigmundfreud427

10 жыл бұрын

Most species we live with now are sentient. If you meant Sapient there are a few possible animals that are candidates for having low level sapience. These being Dolphins, Crows, and Elephants.

@Thorin1300

10 жыл бұрын

we would have killed them all by the crusades if they managed to last that long. BUt we most likely wouldn't be hating on the humans with the different color skin

@Pooua

10 жыл бұрын

Terron Hefley The Crusades were not an extermination campaign.

@sigmundfreud427

10 жыл бұрын

Terron Hefley We probably still would because of a phenomenon called "in group morality"

Based SciShow makes me smarter than school ever did.

It seems like a simple enough idea. If we can lay out a series of photos of our human ancestors (parents, grandparents, great-grandparents, etc.), then why couldn't we extend the process back a million years, showing, perhaps, just the highlights? Sure, the Time Life illustration had incorrect examples, but why not just fix it?

@TheDragonof-rt7ys

10 жыл бұрын

The problem is that if you had, say, a brother, then both of your chains of photos would be identical and would be better represented by a photo tree. Similarly if you extend the photos back a million years, you'll find that Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens originated from the same ancestor and also would be better represented by a tree.

@Pooua

10 жыл бұрын

The Dragon of 2100 Or leave my brother out of it entirely, as I didn't descend from him.

@MattNicassio

10 жыл бұрын

Richard Alexander I totally agree and was going to say the same thing.. The video makes people think that a linear representation is somehow impossible or wrong.. You CAN represent any species' evolution linearly and only include the highlights. Why in the world couldn't you? The picture that people associate with human evolution is in fact wrong if it shows a neanderthal evolving into us, yes. But you could absolutely take the earliest known primate that preceded us, jump way forward to Lucy, then show us, if you wanted to be super simplistic and only show a couple of examples. It doesn't give the complete picture and may confuse some people, but that doesn't mean that a correct linear representation is somehow inaccurate or doesn't have a purpose.

Full metal alchemist fan spotted

when he says homunculus, all i can think of is Full Metal Alchemist

this guy, i really like him (no homo)

@kingmcbrian

10 жыл бұрын

Mihai-Ciprian Ghilinta Lmao xD

@sigmundfreud427

10 жыл бұрын

Byoung Woo Yoon Homo neanderthalis?

@justcharacter2098

3 жыл бұрын

No homo before it was a trend lol

Shit, now I have to learn everything again about evolution.. But thank you any way lol.

@TripperTrail

10 жыл бұрын

Type in "Natural Selection" here on KZread. Pick a video that describes natural selection and It'll make it click for you all over again!

It's just like saying "If the British colonised us, why are there still British people?"

@pimp963

8 жыл бұрын

well tbh theres not a whole lot of actual British left

@pimp963

7 жыл бұрын

teabing Allow me to correct myself I hope the english die out the scotts and the irish are alright and as for my reasons ive honestly never come across an english person I liked arrogant racist and a collective superiority complex and then I suppose I just don't like they're culture.Its relatively straight forward.

@kapnkerf2532

4 жыл бұрын

Because they are very stubborn.

Amazing how we "evolved" so far, but don't have anything better to do than insulting each other... If you don't want to see videos on evolution, then DON'T WATCH THEM! If you believe that evolution is true, who cares what others believe. You are not going to convince them. In the end: everything should just educate themselves. There is plenty of information on evolution and creation. Let's please have intelligent / informed debates if you want to debate on KZread.

@raixira27

10 жыл бұрын

Please and thank you. :)

@SeanGodos

10 жыл бұрын

When you throw mud your hands get dirty, I never insulted him. You are implying I do not want to see videos on evolution because I disagree with them. Do you not understand the concept of searching for truth? You are supposed to know both sides, who can ever be biased and only learn one side of any topic and make an informed decision? Is there a benefit for each person to only learn about things they agree with? This is not good.

@killerbee2562

10 жыл бұрын

You can't have a intelligent, informed debates with these religious freaks. They don't understand the way science works, or the history behind theories . They base their whole world view on fairy tales and are proud of it! Bottom line the religious idiots who post their crap on videos like this are trolls. Therefore they deserve every rude comments they get.

@SeanGodos

10 жыл бұрын

killerbee256 Hi, only one of us is unable to have an "intelligent, informed debate", and incase you can't tell, saying I am a freak, idiot and troll really is saying alot about you and how you deal with an opposing belief system. If you read my first comment please tell me that I am wrong and give me some evidence. I know how "science works", my issue is pretending science is perfect and the creation story is a "fairy tale". Science still has not offered an answer as to what created the Big Bang. If a species will mate, a species will evolve over time. But to say all animals came from the same life form billions of years ago has not been proven. We know Biblically speaking that the garden of eden was near where what science calls "the cradle of life" was. All of a sudden there were cities, art, government, military, municipal powers, agriculture and you name it starting from a few thousands of years ago. So anyways, I would like you to pick apart what I just said and for you to prove me illogical and a troll, thanks, have a nice day.

@killerbee2562

10 жыл бұрын

Sean Godos "Science still has not offered an answer as to what created the Big Bang" A bit behind on string theory aren't you? I wont fault for for not understanding the math fully but recently they have made huge break throughs in discovering what may have started the big bang. Secondary, your basing your world view around myth, there never was a garden of Eden, it's a fairy tale meant to be take as allegory at best. The earth is four billion years old, we know this because we can date volcanic rocks, also modern human fossils date back much far further then the neolithic when agriculture started in the near east, not to mention other hominids which are far older. The bible is mythology the same way the Greek & Roman myth are. It's not literally truth, it's only use in history is understanding the world view of a bronze age semetic people nothing more. The fact you are stuck in that primitive mind set just shows the crime of your parent for indoctrinating you and handicapping your ability to think critically.

Can you please do a video on self-harming? I feel like the subject isn't well understood.

'Oreopithecus which sounds delicious' LMAO

Me: *discussing about evolution in front of my family while eating at the table* Them: *You are such an anti-God* Lol

awesome!

Pfff! That's preposterous. I did not evolve. I am a hyper-intelligent pan-dimensional being who is protruded into your dimension with the goal of observing you. You serve a very important purpose and we await an answer.

the sad part is i keep looking at these videos but none actually fully answers my question they just try to make it more difficult to seem like they are proving a point

Love this. I saw it on Curiosity today and had to get on KZread to like it

hank, as you see the evolution is quite the controversial issue, dont suppose you could do a more in depth vid of this. how carbon dating works, how dna analysis works, as in how we can tell the origins and the path humans spread around the earth

@DataJack

10 жыл бұрын

Evolution is not actually controversial at all. It is one of the best supported theories of all time. It is also hated by some religious people, because it directly contradicts the primitive and incorrect origin stories told in their holy books. So some of those religious people lie (or "exaggerate") about what evolution is, and how it is supported. Then the followers of those people take these lies to heart, and pass them on. Many of them truly believe these lies, and think they are doing the public a service when they bring these untruths up. All that said, I would love to see a series on how we accumulate and verify the various lines of evidence that support evolution :)

@danminer5343

4 жыл бұрын

@@DataJack - You have swallowed tons of lies. There is not even one scientific fact in the world that would favor a belief in evolution. Leading scientists do not believe it but is promoted mainly by atheistic professors and the stupid media. I'd be willing to offer anybody in the world ll$1,000 if they could find and present to me ONE HONEST SCIENTIFIC fact that would show how evolution could be possible or evidence that shows that evolution has occurred. I've read hundreds of books on this and challenged hundreds of evolutionists to show me some science that favors the story of evolution, but none could do so because evolution is a big lie.s The only answer I usually get is that evolution has to be true because they do not want to believe in God and then follow up with wicked name-calling.

@DataJack

4 жыл бұрын

@@danminer5343 remember: your wilful (and hilarious) misunderstanding of evolution does not mean that evolution is not true. And supported by *all* of the evidence we have ever encountered, and refuted by no evidence. Perhaps when you grow up a bit, and learn to understand how science works, you will see how mistaken you are.

@danminer5343

4 жыл бұрын

@@DataJack - notice that you did not give any example of science supporting the story of evolution. That is because none exists. I've read hundreds of comments, watched hundreds of videos over the last two decades, but NEVER NEVER have i found an honest scientific statement that explained how evolution could be possible or any evidence showing it has occurred. The only way possible to believe in the story of evolution is to be DELUDED!

@DataJack

4 жыл бұрын

@@danminer5343 notice that you have no understanding of science at all and that sound scientific evidence for evolution can be found at every natural history museum on earth, as well as every credible university. When you are old enough to go to university, you will be able to see first hand.

It's called the THEORY of evolution for a reason it still needs to be proved , and for all the evolutionists in the comments calling people who express different opinions "dumbasses" this doesn't make you sound smart, it's rather the opposite.

@wooe

7 жыл бұрын

No. Scientific theories isn't claims, they are explanation modells that describe an observed phenomena. They are not guesses or estimations like the common word theory. Scientific theories is the highest for of explanation there is in science. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory

@johnny50424

6 жыл бұрын

wooe . there is no evidence for the evolution fairy tale

So good to finally see a youtuber not wasting my time on stupid greetings and introductions but just spreading knowledge instead.

if this guy was our first ancestor we would have been extinct.

3 creationists disliked this video.

@thegangvault2

10 жыл бұрын

Creationists have no issues with what Hank is talking about here, in fact we have known this for years. We often argue against such illustrations (the "evolution of the horse" picture is another example) and point out, rightly enough, that basically there are only apes and humans in this lineup and that even evolutionists admit it.

@oO_ox_O

10 жыл бұрын

thegangvault2 You make it sound like "creationists" had one voice, but truth is that e.g. thre are some creationists who dismiss evolutionary totally and others that put up arbitrary walls e.g. between "species".

@BigDeanEnergyGaming

10 жыл бұрын

o_O TheCOREFury thegangvault2 well as someone who believes in a world creation so i would be a "creationists" I enjoyed this video because I believe that evolution is a tool that is used within creation. I argue with how it all started but fully support evolution... dont group in people and become closed minded just because of one experience... also I enjoyed the way he put this, cause when I talk to a majority of evolutionists here (where I live), they fully believe that this is true! so in these events it is actually the evolutionists who are wrong...

@oO_ox_O

10 жыл бұрын

deanwells1234 > dont group in people and become closed minded It's not about grouping, it's about definitions, your apparently differs, He put it the way of "evolutionists" vs. "creationists" (us vs. them), one implies evolution, the other doesn't.

@spigotsandcogs

10 жыл бұрын

o_O Or ones like me, who believe that DNA has a natural propensity for progress, rather than just random occurrences.

I want to hear more about Neanderthals from SciShow.

I had to watch this video for a school project and I so didn't want to but then I realized it was Hank and I was like ok :)

+Hunter Russel let me sum this up for ya. 1) dogs aren't colorblind in the literal sense, they can'r see red distinguished from green, they just see a vague color in its place, and can distinguish blue from it. 2) there are many other species with more color receptors than humans - in fact, many bird species have 4 (as opposed to our 3 for red, green and blue) and the mantis shrimp may have as many as 16.