My husband has Type 2 diabetes and has had two eye surgeries because of bleeding retinas. This technology has literally saved his eyesight.
@Dan148332 минут бұрын
So we have established that you are an unreliable source of information.
@TerenceA722 минут бұрын
If it can't cut anything it doesnt meet the definition of being sharp. Sharp (of an object) having an edge or point that is able to cut or pierce something. So yeah great fail before you started.
@Dragonsfire14804 минут бұрын
I have a rare central nervous system disorder that is diagnosed by looking at the retina.
@johnyliltoe5 минут бұрын
GMOs. If I have to explain to one more person that genetic modification doesn't involve poisoning the food supply I'm gonna have an aneurism.
@johnyliltoe5 минут бұрын
Related and topical: Cellular Agriculture.
@kk-kz8nc7 минут бұрын
This just proves again the cancer called social media. Or more the idiots that only get their information from one or two sources.
@arkbg228 минут бұрын
Hey! I think my Eye Dr used this "new machine" to give me an earlier diagnosis too!!! I still don't fully remember and understand everything said between my eye dr, "pre-diabetes" Dr, PCP, vascular Dr & liver dr but they seem very interested in talking to each other about this kind of stuff. I just tell them all "if you're happy then I'm happy" and try what they recommend. It's been working. Lots of my numbers on the app that show my test results have been trending toward the green over the last few years and I definitely don't feel any worse. I think I'm feeling better so go science!
@SgtStuka9 минут бұрын
My Optometrist has had one of those for at least over a decade now, I found out I have a freckle in my eye and when my father's vision first started failing he found out he has a freckle in the same eye and space. But also I never really thought how amazing these machines were till now, it's neat learning how much more they can help with the rest of body health and not just eye health, to me they've been a regular part of my check up every 2 years. Also, what was those eye drops and weird glasses combo mention at the start? 0:55 I've had Glasses my entire life and have never seen nor had such a thing? Is this some American thing that was just cheaper to do? Genuine Curiosity on that.
@AFeastOfIdeas9 минут бұрын
My daughters and I greatly enjoyed this video. The ten year old says you’re funny
@opabinnier13 минут бұрын
"THERMOCEPTION"? Really? NO. Make your minds up: Greek OR Latin, not another bastard smelly hybrid like television (which is now obsolete, thank God!) So which is it to be? I suggest we obviate Greek (THERMESTHESIS) but all the kiddies are still taught Latin, right? So then start calling it CALIDOCEPTION. (A bit clunky for you? Well you seem happy with the ungainly EQUILIBRIOCEPTION when a sensible person would have done the natural thing and reduce it to EQUILIBRIUM even though the word has a separate application. So you have no foot to stand on here.)
@Greifenblut13 минут бұрын
Is he trying to tell me that there are naturally grown D20s out there? Like organically grown D20s?😲
@DrDAC-go7hs18 минут бұрын
Gotta translate 40 meters into American units, the footballfield
@sandradonofrio41319 минут бұрын
Why are you not saying Ophthalmologist? Isn’t that the eye Doctor to see?
@lyndagabriel653923 минут бұрын
This is excellent! This is why I see an ophthalmologist regularly, not just an optometrist - at least in Canada, it is the largely the doctors who have retinal scan access/expertise. I do have very early stages of eye diseases, and comparative photos are great. Having an eye doc experienced in interpreting images means she is picking up on subtle things that I certainly can't make out from background noise... It also provides incentive to follow good eye nutrition, etc. And you've given me excellent additional info on other things I can ask about when we look at my scans... both diabetes and strokes are a personal concern too!
@Tight--LiNeZ30 минут бұрын
I Hypothesize that hair under our arms and between our buttocks, is to reduce friction. This is also what the pubic hair patch is for during sex. To reduce friction against each other in missionary position. Without it our skin sticks together and gets rashy, red & sore from friction & sweat (which can grow fungal infections).. Hair kind of allows sliding between skin in high friction areas. Even stopping our own genital and skin down there from sticking together, and to move more freely. That's my take on why we have hair down there, or even why we didn't lose it from those high friction, sweaty, hot areas between skin. It makes the most sense, and it works. You will know if you have shaved armpits, that your skin sticks together. Or had missionary sex with a person with a waxed or stubbly pubic bone hair patch. That hair is there to reduce friction between hot, sticky skin. Friction patches where are surfaces of skin can rub, seem to have hair. Think about it. Cheers.
@callabeth25835 минут бұрын
I literally got this done today
@johnmiranda230736 минут бұрын
Maybe you should relabel the channel to: “Shill for Mainstream Science.”
@jamesdubben368740 минут бұрын
Do small aircraft still use leaded gasoline?
@dfailsthemost44 минут бұрын
The CO2 one also doesn't take into account that we're also cutting down lots of trees.
@dfailsthemost45 минут бұрын
The iceberg one is flawed logic. Put ice atop the glass and check the level when it melts enough to fall into the glass.
@SaukaKumagae49 минут бұрын
"Knowing more is a always good, even if what we find is not as comforting as we might like" so true in science
@JD3Gamer50 минут бұрын
I’m a nerd so the most cancer causing thing I thought of was Benzene.
@qsvrk231154 минут бұрын
I trust this as much as their reporting on mRNA vaccines
@waynewayne247256 минут бұрын
Ha. And let me guess the vaccine is safe and effeftive
@Bennick32357 минут бұрын
I wish more people were capable of understanding nuance. Everything you just said is coherently constructed, but media outlets, just like the way you constructed and addressed the title of this video, are incentivized to make as strong a claim as possible to fear monger and sell clicks to advertisers. I don't know the best way to approach this topic, but I think the best thing we can do is promote better scientific literacy. I don't even trust myself to read a scientific publication and assess whether it's good or not. I'm not qualified to read most of this stuff (or at least I feel like I'm not). I don't know or understand how the peer review process actually works. I feel like so many just say that a study exists in x publication and "x is a good/bad journal" (at the risk of associating this with formerly Twitter) without actually going into depth on why. I have so many problems with the world's access to scientific literature and doubts about what I've read even though it might be legit... So while I doubt media's ability to cover these things responsibly, with tact, I feel pathetically unequipped to figure it out without it. I personally feel like maybe you guys should do some sort of playlist or secondary show that gets at the heart of how to read science and addresses things like "what's a good sample size?" "what does the peer review process look like" "what makes a journal trustworthy and why" "when should I be worried about who's funding a study" "should I ever really trust a study or should I wait/look for a meta-analysis". Maybe you already have videos to that effect and I haven't seen them. I have friends and family that get messed up by even basic credibility issues and I don't feel like I have a much better handle on gathering knowledge this way myself. I just feel like we've already lost because of how bad general scientific literacy is. (we could easily talk about how the capitalist profit motive has ruined all this too, but I think fighting against the basics here would at least be a good start)
@els1f58 минут бұрын
Wow! I never heard #7 before, but that you must have some SERIOUS deficit in critical thought and TERRIBLE sexual education to think that! 😱🤯 It's honestly kind of sad to think of how many systems had to fail a person before they think that😢
@maxdon2001Сағат бұрын
Great video!
@WowUsernameAvailableСағат бұрын
7:35 - randomly singing "Yellow fever/ Yellow fever/ Is in my mind and in my eyes"🙄
@AyudadoСағат бұрын
Great, great video
@zes7215Сағат бұрын
wrg
@joshuaskrehot3765Сағат бұрын
I’m a neuro major interested in ophthalmology, great video!
@zes7215Сағат бұрын
wrg
@user-vh1re5oe7qСағат бұрын
Mankind and the continuing wars are the real treat. And that's just one of the seven deadly sins.
@ynotchristian1366Сағат бұрын
🤔🤔🤔
@HammyannСағат бұрын
And how did we as a society duty decide eyes and teeth are not “health” enough to be under our pathetic health insurance system?
@jessicamarino7448Сағат бұрын
Ha ha!! Eye-dentification device?
@GorgonzeyeСағат бұрын
I've seen people explain aboriginals the same as bivalves.
@heyimpercy7368Сағат бұрын
Mowing its self is the problem. Plant native and don’t mow.
@Jerry-sn4nxСағат бұрын
Well we know the so called cure caused cancer FOR SURE.
@michaeldomansky8497Сағат бұрын
Underwater Pigs!
@sahuanitasahu7696Сағат бұрын
I thought birds lay eggs by themselves
@micheals1992Сағат бұрын
When I was a kid I noticed my antihistamines made me sleep (I have a nut allergy) so I secretly took them on christmas eve because I always used to struggle to goto sleep. 😅
@adrianmedeea486Сағат бұрын
For almost a year had Herpes and I was lonely and sad luckily I was directed to a very kind and Great DRALLENBEN who helped me cure my Herpes and today I am free from Herpes and healthy .................
@108RudiСағат бұрын
Yes, we're going to change the temperature of the planet with concrete.
@sophierobinson2738Сағат бұрын
My optometrist caught a woman’s diabetes with the scan.
@ktefccreСағат бұрын
If 20% of the fat becomes water, why do we still need to drink water after we exercise?
@PamaguСағат бұрын
i honestly thought the most carcinogenic things we do as humans was TEFLON!
@sahuanitasahu7696Сағат бұрын
Does that happen to humans
@Kingtrollface259Сағат бұрын
Been getting blurry vision a lot recently, apparently that's a sign
@snorman1911Сағат бұрын
Uh, yes, we have seen an increase in cancers, and it's from those vaccinated.
Пікірлер
My husband has Type 2 diabetes and has had two eye surgeries because of bleeding retinas. This technology has literally saved his eyesight.
So we have established that you are an unreliable source of information.
If it can't cut anything it doesnt meet the definition of being sharp. Sharp (of an object) having an edge or point that is able to cut or pierce something. So yeah great fail before you started.
I have a rare central nervous system disorder that is diagnosed by looking at the retina.
GMOs. If I have to explain to one more person that genetic modification doesn't involve poisoning the food supply I'm gonna have an aneurism.
Related and topical: Cellular Agriculture.
This just proves again the cancer called social media. Or more the idiots that only get their information from one or two sources.
Hey! I think my Eye Dr used this "new machine" to give me an earlier diagnosis too!!! I still don't fully remember and understand everything said between my eye dr, "pre-diabetes" Dr, PCP, vascular Dr & liver dr but they seem very interested in talking to each other about this kind of stuff. I just tell them all "if you're happy then I'm happy" and try what they recommend. It's been working. Lots of my numbers on the app that show my test results have been trending toward the green over the last few years and I definitely don't feel any worse. I think I'm feeling better so go science!
My Optometrist has had one of those for at least over a decade now, I found out I have a freckle in my eye and when my father's vision first started failing he found out he has a freckle in the same eye and space. But also I never really thought how amazing these machines were till now, it's neat learning how much more they can help with the rest of body health and not just eye health, to me they've been a regular part of my check up every 2 years. Also, what was those eye drops and weird glasses combo mention at the start? 0:55 I've had Glasses my entire life and have never seen nor had such a thing? Is this some American thing that was just cheaper to do? Genuine Curiosity on that.
My daughters and I greatly enjoyed this video. The ten year old says you’re funny
"THERMOCEPTION"? Really? NO. Make your minds up: Greek OR Latin, not another bastard smelly hybrid like television (which is now obsolete, thank God!) So which is it to be? I suggest we obviate Greek (THERMESTHESIS) but all the kiddies are still taught Latin, right? So then start calling it CALIDOCEPTION. (A bit clunky for you? Well you seem happy with the ungainly EQUILIBRIOCEPTION when a sensible person would have done the natural thing and reduce it to EQUILIBRIUM even though the word has a separate application. So you have no foot to stand on here.)
Is he trying to tell me that there are naturally grown D20s out there? Like organically grown D20s?😲
Gotta translate 40 meters into American units, the footballfield
Why are you not saying Ophthalmologist? Isn’t that the eye Doctor to see?
This is excellent! This is why I see an ophthalmologist regularly, not just an optometrist - at least in Canada, it is the largely the doctors who have retinal scan access/expertise. I do have very early stages of eye diseases, and comparative photos are great. Having an eye doc experienced in interpreting images means she is picking up on subtle things that I certainly can't make out from background noise... It also provides incentive to follow good eye nutrition, etc. And you've given me excellent additional info on other things I can ask about when we look at my scans... both diabetes and strokes are a personal concern too!
I Hypothesize that hair under our arms and between our buttocks, is to reduce friction. This is also what the pubic hair patch is for during sex. To reduce friction against each other in missionary position. Without it our skin sticks together and gets rashy, red & sore from friction & sweat (which can grow fungal infections).. Hair kind of allows sliding between skin in high friction areas. Even stopping our own genital and skin down there from sticking together, and to move more freely. That's my take on why we have hair down there, or even why we didn't lose it from those high friction, sweaty, hot areas between skin. It makes the most sense, and it works. You will know if you have shaved armpits, that your skin sticks together. Or had missionary sex with a person with a waxed or stubbly pubic bone hair patch. That hair is there to reduce friction between hot, sticky skin. Friction patches where are surfaces of skin can rub, seem to have hair. Think about it. Cheers.
I literally got this done today
Maybe you should relabel the channel to: “Shill for Mainstream Science.”
Do small aircraft still use leaded gasoline?
The CO2 one also doesn't take into account that we're also cutting down lots of trees.
The iceberg one is flawed logic. Put ice atop the glass and check the level when it melts enough to fall into the glass.
"Knowing more is a always good, even if what we find is not as comforting as we might like" so true in science
I’m a nerd so the most cancer causing thing I thought of was Benzene.
I trust this as much as their reporting on mRNA vaccines
Ha. And let me guess the vaccine is safe and effeftive
I wish more people were capable of understanding nuance. Everything you just said is coherently constructed, but media outlets, just like the way you constructed and addressed the title of this video, are incentivized to make as strong a claim as possible to fear monger and sell clicks to advertisers. I don't know the best way to approach this topic, but I think the best thing we can do is promote better scientific literacy. I don't even trust myself to read a scientific publication and assess whether it's good or not. I'm not qualified to read most of this stuff (or at least I feel like I'm not). I don't know or understand how the peer review process actually works. I feel like so many just say that a study exists in x publication and "x is a good/bad journal" (at the risk of associating this with formerly Twitter) without actually going into depth on why. I have so many problems with the world's access to scientific literature and doubts about what I've read even though it might be legit... So while I doubt media's ability to cover these things responsibly, with tact, I feel pathetically unequipped to figure it out without it. I personally feel like maybe you guys should do some sort of playlist or secondary show that gets at the heart of how to read science and addresses things like "what's a good sample size?" "what does the peer review process look like" "what makes a journal trustworthy and why" "when should I be worried about who's funding a study" "should I ever really trust a study or should I wait/look for a meta-analysis". Maybe you already have videos to that effect and I haven't seen them. I have friends and family that get messed up by even basic credibility issues and I don't feel like I have a much better handle on gathering knowledge this way myself. I just feel like we've already lost because of how bad general scientific literacy is. (we could easily talk about how the capitalist profit motive has ruined all this too, but I think fighting against the basics here would at least be a good start)
Wow! I never heard #7 before, but that you must have some SERIOUS deficit in critical thought and TERRIBLE sexual education to think that! 😱🤯 It's honestly kind of sad to think of how many systems had to fail a person before they think that😢
Great video!
7:35 - randomly singing "Yellow fever/ Yellow fever/ Is in my mind and in my eyes"🙄
Great, great video
wrg
I’m a neuro major interested in ophthalmology, great video!
wrg
Mankind and the continuing wars are the real treat. And that's just one of the seven deadly sins.
🤔🤔🤔
And how did we as a society duty decide eyes and teeth are not “health” enough to be under our pathetic health insurance system?
Ha ha!! Eye-dentification device?
I've seen people explain aboriginals the same as bivalves.
Mowing its self is the problem. Plant native and don’t mow.
Well we know the so called cure caused cancer FOR SURE.
Underwater Pigs!
I thought birds lay eggs by themselves
When I was a kid I noticed my antihistamines made me sleep (I have a nut allergy) so I secretly took them on christmas eve because I always used to struggle to goto sleep. 😅
For almost a year had Herpes and I was lonely and sad luckily I was directed to a very kind and Great DRALLENBEN who helped me cure my Herpes and today I am free from Herpes and healthy .................
Yes, we're going to change the temperature of the planet with concrete.
My optometrist caught a woman’s diabetes with the scan.
If 20% of the fat becomes water, why do we still need to drink water after we exercise?
i honestly thought the most carcinogenic things we do as humans was TEFLON!
Does that happen to humans
Been getting blurry vision a lot recently, apparently that's a sign
Uh, yes, we have seen an increase in cancers, and it's from those vaccinated.