I enjoy your content a lot. Funny, informative. Thank you.

Thanks Paul! Appreciated

Anthropic principle. I have no problems with it unless it stops some research. But some things are just random.

A mystery wrapped in a dimensional riddle. Still hurts when I fall over though.

Gravity is weak. It is also patient. How well could the other three forces help a human escape on its own from the planet's gravity well? And where exactly does the gravity well of our planet even end?

So Gravity is so weak because it has not learned (yet) how to cheat? Fascinating Topic, thank you Spaceman!

This is neat.

This discussion of why gravity is so weak ignores its need to be different from the other forces. The other forces are all about what is happening on the atomic scale. The strong nuclear and weak nuclear forces are at that smallest scale involving particles that have mass and cannot venture beyond that. Electromagnetism is also happening at a small-scale involving mass. However, gravity is a force that increases with the number of accumulated particles involved. In Earth, it functions as the synergistic collective sum of the gravity of 10^50 particles. So, if it had any seemingly effective strength at the atomic scale, even though it has some, it would wind up being way too strong as the accumulated sum of a planet. It seems it is Gravity that has managed to cheat the Higgs field so that it can do its job effectively at large cosmic scales of planets, galaxies, and galaxy clusters. Otherwise, you would have trouble lifting your coffee cup.

Does gravity can be the "movement/flow" of spacetime from the "empty" space (expanding universe) to the space where the mass is (contracting universe)?

Ouestion: I am currently studying data science but with concerntration on astrophysics. Will it be a problem for me to join on astrophysics for post graduate?

When you started talking about how well we knew the masses of the W and Z bosons, I thought you’d be going into the Fermilab results which gave the W boson a different mass.

@donsample1002

2 жыл бұрын

…with a tie in to the slogan on your cup.

I'm sorry but every time I hear a discussion where we talk about Gravity as a force, I get dissonance with Einstein's space-time fabric and I just can't reconcile.

@Paul M. Sutter 0:09 Um, you're forgetting one, and I'll give you a hint: We can't count without it.

Excuse for bigger particle collider?🤔

Is there a hypothetic argument for a second dimension of time? Time spreading perpendicular to the arrow of entropy. Gravity is the warping of spacetime from Einstein.

Geometric Unity!

National anthem for gravity: Bohemian Gravity by acapella science!

Don't crow about beating gravity just yet - try holding that same mug for a few hours and see who wins.

@jannikheidemann3805

2 жыл бұрын

Entropy wins. Entropy always wins in the end.

It is possible there may NEVER be a quantum theory of gravity because gravity (and time ) are recessive in the quantum field.

"a little bit of a fuzzy definition" is not a good start

So, we are in a simulation? ;-) But what kind of physics does work for the simulation engineers? What's their physics? A simulation theory just pushes the definite answers further out, it's a kind of a lazy idea ;-) It's not easy... So, many thanks for your video!

Question: During a Supernova isn't gravity a major player in that sequence? Gravity finally getting its way to form a Black hole. Is that an exception for gravity? Isn't gravity super strong during this?

@theFLCLguy

2 жыл бұрын

Kinda, a black hole forms when gravity finally gets stronger than all other forces. It isn't that gravity gets stronger, it's that it gets more concentrated to the point becomes the dominant force.

why is it called the higgs mechanism and not the higgs force?

@foobargorch

2 жыл бұрын

(my best guess is that the definition of "force" isn't "interaction" but rather "explains acceleration")

Energy is the action, gravity is the reaction. Energy is the action, the warping of spacetime is the reaction. Energy is the action, the expansion of space is the reaction. Energy is the action, dark matter is the reaction. Energy is the action accelerated expansion of space is the reaction at extreme distance. Gravity is a reaction, not a force or action. In fact, the only action really taking place throughout the universe is energy. I would assume that the type 1 civilizations throughout the universe already know how to make energy from matter without moving parts, over-unity of energy.

@mrmotl1

Жыл бұрын

Yes I came up with this idea recently that relates to this idea and it's that gravity isn't so much a force as it is the reaction as you said, but it's the falling into place amongst it all and it's weighted balance in the aftermath. Ultimately it's all the forces combined and the relational effect of all the friction they produce as well as the added up effect of those opposing forces of nature all around you neutralizing all potential by adding themselves to the pile and seeing how deep they get or how high they stack in the general resolution of it all. It's basically the coherent field alignment of the magnetic field effect on all the surface layers it develops over time and its atmospheric filters ground potential within its active noise interface above its general surface.

What about gluons? Doesn't the Higgs boson only cover like 5% of the mass of particles? And it's not weird. You just need a bit of philosophy, like the anthropic principle. Or said simply, we are here, and we observe. How could the universe be anti-observer and still be observed? Tree falls in the forest and no one hears it and all. Dumbing things down won't help anyone, neither will occulting them.

Gravity is not a force. There is no "pull" - your coffee cup is following Newton's laws - on earth space time is just warped.

The issue in physics is the reduction to only three spatial dimensions. When really it's all about perspective. The number of dimensions a system has follows the inverse square law. Each dimension is a unique possible state/location. This is why things look more chaotic the smaller you go because the number of possible dimensions shrinks. Till the spatial dimensions drop below one dimension, which is the Planck scale. Below that is the vacuum which itself is made of sub dimensional fluctuations that are made and amplified by gravitational waves.

It’s perfect for Homo sapiens.

Gravity is misguided! 🤣

Question, if the speed of causality was to be slowing down, could you tell the difference between it and an expanding universe? Because if you can't then couldn't that be what dark energy is? And could gravity be the synchronization of vibrations through space-time as gravitational waves? The force carrier would be virtual particles. And the reason it's so weak is interference from other objects. It's why the vacuum seems to have so much energy.

Thats' so GRRR infuriating is it knot? ;

If time is just entropy, and space is an illusion (my belief). Is gravity the curvature of entropy and illusion?

@theFLCLguy

2 жыл бұрын

Time and space being separate is the false. Increasing distance is the same thing as slowing down. And the reverse is true, decreasing distance is the same as speeding up. Time itself is the illusion. Our limited perspective due to taking time to process information keeps us from seeing more than a moment of time. If you could somehow see all of existence it would look kinda like one of those illusions of a still image that appears to move but it's just your perspective that's changing.

@CepheiVV

2 жыл бұрын

@@theFLCLguy I believe that the whole existence has already happened, and as you suggest, past, present and future are part of the same object, and it's our brain the one feeling that time is passing.

Gravity is not weak

Stop saying that are 4 forces. Gravity is not a force so it has no particle carrier.

@ChinnuWoW

2 жыл бұрын

That would violate the principle of locality. Gravity absolutely IS a force. Spacetime doesn't curve by itself.

@fcalin21

2 жыл бұрын

@@ChinnuWoW The scientist contradict you. "Spacetime doesn't curve by itself." - well, it is because of energy or matter.

@ChinnuWoW

2 жыл бұрын

@@fcalin21 It takes force to curve something. To force objects in a certain direction. That's a force created by mass.

@fcalin21

2 жыл бұрын

@@ChinnuWoW I do not agree.

@ChinnuWoW

2 жыл бұрын

@@fcalin21 ...okay.

What happened to the dirty blackboard? I like the messiness, kinda’ like the universe.

@ChinnuWoW

2 жыл бұрын

and your life.

Universe is Quaternion Space! Copyright 2022 Wardell Lindsay E=[ -mGM/r, cP]=[-mc^2, cP]=[-cp,cP]