Paul M. Sutter is a theoretical cosmologist at the Institute for Advanced Computational Science at Stony Brook University and the Flatiron Institute in NYC. He is also an award-winning science communicator, author, host, and U.S. Cultural Ambassador.
Пікірлер
Lol one small step c'mon let's go
They cannot go by old merhod snd technology, now need to showbot is by advance technology and if it fsils the whole world will know.
sure. elton musk can do it cheap
It's because it was never possible and never happened
The later Apollo flights landed in more challenging areas including lunar highlands and stayed for 3 days. 3 EVAs!
Apollo 6 was an unmanned test flight. No crew onboard.
You need to catch up pal moon landing was faked they don't have the technology to go through the radiation belt then or no NASA's the biggest fraud in history
What if China found gold deposit and rich minerals in the moon?
The USA won't return to the Moon as long as their currupt governments keep giving money to scammers like Elon Musk. Priorities as well. The US' people are not having a good time. Crumbling infrastructure, stratospheric cost of living, warmongering governments. Fix your system in the 1st place, then we can talk about a space race revival.
The federal budget is now being used to house illegal immigrants in hotels. That and lining the pockets of politicians.
I don’t think word salad will rewrite physics. Just my opinion.
Why the robot on Mars looks way different than the moon ❓😂
Can anyone see their shadow in the dark❓🤣
Where the stars are not shown nor the Sun ❓😂
If they went a few times why there's only one image, video etc❓
Why the US flag wave❓
I want to know how they got the four wheeler out of a small spaceship 😂😂
Less technology back in the 62 now with more technology they can't go 🙄🤔🤦😏🫣😒😐👺.
I want to know who was recording when they were landing 😂😂
Because it's fake 😂.
It wasn't hard to return to the Moon, which is why NASA successfully completed 5 further moon-landing missions: • Apollo 12 (Nov '69) • Apollo 14 (Jan '71) • Apollo 15 (July '71) • Apollo 16 (April '72) • Apollo 17 (Dec '72)
It's BS...the greatest hoax in history.
In my life time, I hope to see the first humans actually land on the moon.
I hope for you too. In my lifetime, I've already seen twelve humans land on the Moon.
@@therealzilch lol, what???
Hey Sir I hope you reply i am teen who jumps everday from his career choices from software engineer to astrophysicist kind of confused but i eagerly love astrophysics like it gives dozens of dopamine listening all about this i am good at maths i know i can do it but can you give me the idea of salary because for me financial situation does matter as my parents are not well educated actually i will be the only one in my family who will choose to be a scientist and i have some family debt i wanna pay this is why somehow money matters for me. I hope you understand the perspective of 16 year highschooler who just want to do something different that nobody in my ancestry even knew of😅
They spent $200 Billions to land on the Moon but then destroyed the entire technology, footage, data and the knowledge. 😂
Ha ha. No they didn't. This is a case of the proverbial "fish that got away" getting bigger all the time. What NASA lost were the two original tapes of the Apollo 11 video broadcast- but there are very good copies. And they also "lost" everything they couldn't pay for after Congress slashed their funds in 1972: the tooling, the assembly lines, the infrastructure necessary to build big rockets. No knowledge was lost. No footage was lost (except for the original videos from Apollo 11). No photos were lost. No films were lost. No science was lost. Didn't your mother teach you to not spread lies?
Cmon man, not like it's the sixties any more, you know, the thing...
🤡🌎🥳
FJB
Trump's liquor license was just suspended in New Jersey, because he's now a convicted felon. Sorry.
Biggest lie in history, well second biggest lie, biggest lie ever is Joe Biden won the election
Ah, a Trump supporter. What's your third favourite conspiracy theory?
@@yassassin6425 My bet is that he's a flat Earther too. And an antivaxxer.
Verner Von Braun was a genius, as well as the hundreds of people who worked on the project with him. We will never go back to the moon, if we ever went there to begin with.
On the contrary,, there were nine crewed missions to the moon with six landings - and yes, of course mankind will return. It will be the same sort of people that brand that as fake too.
The first time is always the hardest, after that it’s a walk in the park.
Incorrect. There were nine crewed missions to the moon and six landings...all of them were fraught with danger and difficulty.
Anyone can explain how to transmit live video data from the Apollo 11 moon landing rover to the Earth station with 70s technology? Or is it recorded video?
No, it was a TV signal transmission sent by Unified S-Band.
Also, Apollo 11 had no rover. Neil and Buzz had to walk.
Money laundering at its finest!!!
2/10 for correctly spelling possesive "its" with no apostrophe. Content: 0/10.
One scuba tank of air right ?? Lolol
Oh Jeez this again? Is this some sort of popular thing trending with dumb conspiracy believers, only the last few months its been the belief that a vacuum exerts a force, before that it was some nonsense about the inverse square law of light. Do you people have a mind of your own? So you think that they used scuba tanks on the moon? Ffs, I swear these comments are getting exponentially dumber by the day. The longest singular EVA was Apollo 17's second (of three), at 7 hours and 37 minutes. A diver's tank is usually not a rebreather like the Apollo PLSS which can last much longer than an open circuit Scuba. Diving air is usually either regular air at 21% oxygen or Nitrox with up to 40% oxygen, and 60% nitrogen. Astronauts on spacewalks use tanks of 100% oxygen. Divers can’t use 100% oxygen because it’s poisonous under high pressures, while space suits maintain comfortable low pressures. In other words, they get 5x more oxygen per tank. Seriously, do you think that this supposed "gotcha" was not only overlooked by NASA but has escaped the attention of entire branches of science, specialist disciplines the world over, and expertise actually relating to this technology and yet you, and insignificant nobody on You Tube claim to know better? Really? So you when you don't understand something you declare it to be fake?
@@yassassin6425 Nice work again. And yes, after years of following this, the claims are really getting dumber by the day. I've also heard that "the Moon has no gravity" and "vacuum sucks with enormous negative pressure" fairly often nowadays. This wasn't the case five years ago or so.
Well, say what you will about modern people, technology, and systems we have today, but what we had in the 60’s in all three subjects have set the bar, and are looking back, pointing up, and saying “We did it, now you match it, or even better, improve it.” All the plans they love to talk about will mean nothing if you can’t match that first step, and so far, it hasn’t been. Lots of neat things in other areas of space, but you have to duplicate what was done before, or you can never take the next step…….
Apollo consisted of 17 missions, not one.
Most Moon landing deniers don't realize this.
There are thousands of reasons that Apollo never went to the moon. The Van Allen belts, cosmic rays, the F1 engine didn't have enough thrust to to make the trip? Where did they get all of the Oxygen necessary to support 2 guys for over 24 hrs EVA? How did they make film cameras work in a vacuum at -200 to +200 degrees F? Why wasn't the film completely fogged from radiation, even if they could make the camera work? There are thousands of anomalies that can't be explained. It was a complete hoax. Think about it. If that was a scam, how many other things has our government, media, medical system, and all of the 3 letter institutions lied about. We are living in a complete "Truman Show". Wake up!!!
Why don't you look up the answers? You have internet access. For instance, if you'd looked, you would have found that the temperatures on the Moon during the morning, the only time the astronauts were there, were not that extreme. Apollo 11 recorded -23⁰C to 7⁰C. Try searching for the answers from some other source than conspiracy videos.
We could afford to spend a big chunk of the US budget on Moon landings because we didn't have a lot of bums on welfare as we do now.
Uh but they supposedly got it done in the 60's.
Yes, with technology that is now obsolete and objectives and mission profiles that were completely different to the aims of Project Artemis.
what do you mean RETURN???? We never been there before Ever!! Are you mental?
On the contrary, there were nine crewed missions to the moon with six landings. It would have been more had it not been for the premature cancellation of the programme by Congress and the aborted landing of Apollo 13. Presumably NASA inexplicably felt the need to fake their own failure too?
it never happened and you all know it
On the contrary the consilience of scientific, technical, historical, independent and third party evidence demonstrates otherwise and has a voice of its own.
Ya, in my dream.
...You have a sex life?
If we do not believe in anything anymore then we cannot accomplish anything ever again. WOKEism.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 The moon??? Kkkkk. Isso conta para quê? Ir á lua fazer o quê? Que benéfico é que foi para todos ter estado na lua? 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Nonsense.
No use saying it - demonstrate why.
Deversity is not a strength. The best design is the simplest design
there was no crew on Apollo 6.
Not convinced. Doesn't make sense.
Your personal incredulity has zero bearing upon reality.
That's true. My personal opinion doesn't matter. Still, I say I'm not convinced.
@@nzehavi Well that's introspective and humble of you to acknowledge that (most don't), but in the interest of honesty and integrity ask yourself how you can possibly brand something as fake simply because it does not make sense to you and in the complete lack of knowledge and understanding of the subject? That's dangerous.
I would not expect NASA to check the blueprints of Saturn V or Apollo program to replicate exactly. I would expect them to learn from the successes and failure and see how today's technology solve or improve processes. As I stated in my previous comments it would be cheaper. They would be using windows OS and highly efficient hardware to solve what they were able to solve with those huge, inneficient and expensive computers they had back in the day. come on
the fact that it costed 260billion back in the day (in today's dollars) does not mean than doing the exact same type of mission today would cost that and a more complex mission would cost > 260 billion. Its just a good exercise to check the value of that amount in real terms today. When you take into account the technological advancement it actually would be way cheaper to the exact same mission. this is also that applies for all the economic system, it's the fundamental concept in Economics that explains why we are richer or not in time or relative to other countries. So, taking into account the technology we have today we know for a fact that doing the exact same mission would be cheaper. and a more complex mission will build upon that. Just don't get too creative with the math.