As a biologist i’m so glad that these concepts are emerging. Thank you so much for your work. The theory of darwinian evolution is crumbling and it’s time for the truth to emerge.

@Bomtombadi1

2 жыл бұрын

Really Luca? According to who? Btw, you’re a nutritionist vastly overstating by your expertise.

@JoshuaFinancialPL

2 жыл бұрын

How are you surviving in that world? I was under the impression that any deviation from evolution as fact was thought crime and career suicide.

@kimberiedema6951

2 жыл бұрын

so I wonder as you are a biologist how you know the theory of evolution is false?

@wileycoyotegenius1

2 жыл бұрын

@@kimberiedema6951 there is no evidence of evolution. and science knows it

@robertp5998

2 жыл бұрын

@@kimberiedema6951 Even at evolutionary conferences, evolutionist admit they need a new theory because the old theory doesn't work. It holds no explanatory power to "create something new". Available data suggests that nature does not evolve but de-evolves. That is to say, genetic information is lost and not gained.

This was excellent - thank you. I live in a family of engineers (two aeronautical engineers) and they have NO problem recognizing the hand of an extraordinary designer in natural systems.

@seaknightvirchow8131

Жыл бұрын

As a generality, I think that those professions like engineers and physicians have far less difficulty recognizing design than biologists. Partly because one’s career is jeopardized by not having an allegiance to macroevolution and partly due a blindness to the teleological view because they do not look at function the way an engineer or physician does. Every summer, I take joy in observing birds, particularly barn swallows. I am a former Marine Corps aviator and I can tell you that no human can fly an aircraft the way a barn swallow flies. From nest building to transitioning to a precise landing from flight is nothing short of very precise hardware and software.

@bentobin9606

Жыл бұрын

Ur family of r words shows everything that is wrong with the current education-industrial complex. U know some science. EGINEERS ARE NOT ASTRONOMERS WHO STUDY THE BIG BANG. Hint: listen to the real scientists

This was an excellent presentation. As a pathologist, I began to question macroevolution several decades ago. Not long after, Denton, Wells, Behe and others affirmed that my skepticism was well justified. Stephen Meyer amplified that doubt into conviction. How anyone can deny the teleology in biology affirms what the Apostle Paul wrote, that one has to repress the knowledge of our creator. The mind of God gives me chills.

@ludwigkirchner08

2 жыл бұрын

Do you believe germ theory is correct or terrain theory is correct?

@sliglusamelius8578

2 жыл бұрын

I agree. I’m a retired MD, board certified, and I doubted the paradigm of abiogenesis/phylogenetic tree of life the more I studied biology in detail. The design theory is the only thing that makes any sense.

@seaknightvirchow8131

Жыл бұрын

@@ludwigkirchner08 I believe that both theories of disease are complementary.

@natan983

Жыл бұрын

@@sliglusamelius8578 It's true? Can I ask you a question?

@natan983

Жыл бұрын

Can I ask a question?

You are a very good speaker. You present in a way that’s very comprehendible and engaging. I love the pace and build up.

This is just brilliant. The illustration of the self-driving car is eye-opening.

I was impressed by the phrase "it's disappointing how often people allow to misrepresent the science to the public so long they're trying to suppress the evidence for design." It is true! The internet age is helping to overcome the atheism dictatorship in the scientific community and in the society in general.

@stephenhousman6975

2 жыл бұрын

Weird wasn't it religion that killed Copernicus because he found evidence that the earth wasn't the center of our solar system?

@DiscoveryScienceChannel

2 жыл бұрын

Nope. No one "killed" Copernicus, least of all the Catholic Church. Nor was the idea that the Earth wasn't the center of our solar system particularly bothersome or regarded as having demoted humans. See, among other sources: kzread.info/dash/bejne/eYN_s8mHe8KXhMY.html physicstoday.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.2825071 historyforatheists.com/2018/07/the-great-myths-6-copernicus-deathbed-publication/

It is a wonderful endeavor that you are involved with Dr. Miller. Thank you for explaining this in such a way that made it easy to grasp. I always wondered why biologists could not see design in the world. Everything that we see is so magnificent in its design. The results of analysis from an engineer's perspective may have a big imact for not only biologists, but for the whole world. Kudos to you.

As a retired science teacher, YES, PLEASE! ... REMIND EVERYONE OF THE PRINCIPLE OF PREDICTION in the scientific method!!! THANK YOU!

This is fantastic! Thank you for putting this out all free.

This is truly mind blowing. Great work again by ID.

Well worn battlecry of many an atheist: "Give me your creation, that I may patent, plunder, and plagiarize....but not your Creator Whom, let's admit it, I despise."

@brendawilliams8062

2 жыл бұрын

Yeap

@ingenuity168

Жыл бұрын

You can't despise something that doesn't exist.

Tuitei: "Todas as principais previsões da teoria evolucionista provaram-se falsas, enquanto as do design inteligente, verdadeiras...Os pressupostos subjacentes da biologia estão mudando radicalmente." "Ainda vão falar em evolução", mas "da boca para fora". Vídeo excelente! Brian Miller conseguiu ser sucinto, sem deixar de apresentar uma visão ampla e bem-documentada da controvérsia "design por criação x 'design' por evolução" e claras evidências contrárias ao paradigma evolucionista e confirmadoras do design inteligente.

Thanks for the encouragement, my son has two boys approaching the higher grades in school. It's really hard sometimes going against the norm. Give us more!

I absolutely love these full length talks. Thank you.

This was absolutely stunning.

This is one of the best videos on KZread for the scientific mind This is quite an achievement considering the high quality of your previous videos Keep it up

Great teaching, thank you very much for sharing. May God Bless you and your loved ones...

... unfortunately we have very little information on Healthcare DIAGNOSTICS & ASSISTANCE topics, and we are very GRATEFUL for the least we could have from you today... thanks

Excellent presentation

@DiscoveryScienceChannel

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you! Cheers!

amazing factually filled presentation! Thank you!

@stephenhousman6975

2 жыл бұрын

I am still waiting on what things he said were actually factual.

@candeffect

2 жыл бұрын

@@stephenhousman6975 Evolutionism is as useless as a high school book report written by a stoner.

Invaluable specific information, thank you.

@DiscoveryScienceChannel

2 жыл бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

Similar designs are not due to evolution. They are similar because the design comes from the same common designer's software house..

Superb presentation: electrifying!! Viva la Revolution!

Thank you! It was very impressive to me the fact that there are changes, in existing functional mechanism, that can't occur gradually, rather some parts have to be sustituted at once to achieve a new functional design.

Thank you. On this year I donate to Discovery Institute. From South Korea

Excellent! Keep up the great work.

Gratitude abounds in this comments section. The wonder child inside each individual is filled with joy!

Thank you for this very helpful and inspiring information, I am very grateful!

Started slow ended up being an absolute rout of the evolutionists !! Thank you for the effort, most of society is too preoccupied to pierce through the thick clouds of propaganda

@stephenhousman6975

2 жыл бұрын

Well good thing evolutionists don't actually exist. Also disproving evolution doesn't mean you can insert God. You still need to actually demonstrate that.

@robmarshall956

2 жыл бұрын

@@stephenhousman6975 no we really don’t.

@truthbebold4009

Жыл бұрын

@@stephenhousman6975 No, there are actually people who believe in evolution.

9:00 Reiss page 356 is like a person who rules out the fact that a person actually designed a watch, who is then left with the continuous processes and materials of the watch to explain why it exists. I have a watch and believe it was designed and produced by a watch maker, yet I've never seen or met them. Such a commitment to rejecting design will never establish the fact that it was indeed designed.

People are so busy fulfilling their worldly desire that this very important video is watched by only 27 thousand people where a video showing cat chasing the mouse ( like videos) are seen by million of people.

Great presentation, thank you.

Great lecture sir

Very interesting and true! By the way: Epigenetics explains best adaptational changes in living organisms. It is a fine tuning program working above (greek “epi”) the DNA code. It does not change the DNA itself, but governs how it is expressed.

Oooh yes, the "gradual new design"-problem! (of jaws in the example) @31:18 I've been 'trolling' in the comments under videos about whale evolution for some time now.. With whale evolution being the so called 'poster child' of Darwinian theory, I would ask how the Darwinian theory proponents would see it happen for a whale with teeth, growing bigger and obviously needing bigger or more prey, to not starve in the process of changing those teeth to baleins and transferring to the tiny krill and plankton they now feed on... Lol!

@sliglusamelius8578

2 жыл бұрын

Whale evolution hypothesis is utter nonsense. The entire physiology and anatomy of the land mammals that supposedly are ancestral to whales would have to change. It’s ridiculous to imagine a slow change to fully aquatic life.

Concise and to the point. Evolution is s belief, it's a dogma that flies against both evidence and logic.

@stephenhousman6975

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah while religion has you believe we came from dirt and everything came from nothing.

@masada2828

2 жыл бұрын

@@stephenhousman6975 - Yes! A supreme Spirit, a God we cannot even imagine.

@markmeyer6729

2 жыл бұрын

Regarding Housmans remark... perhaps he could clarify how creation ex nihilo, which was a theological response to the then presumptive common philosophical Greco-Roman belief that the universe has always been of the same matter (the same presupposition held by materialist science until the big bang theory blew it up) is in any form a reasonable refutation or response to Aengrods comment. Perhaps he could enlighten us as to the nature of the precursor state of energy that exploded into the universe we inhabit, since that seems, in his judgment, to have something to do with the presumptive acceptance of undirected evolution as an inarguable truth.

Bravo 👏💯💞 Keep calling them out!!

Amazing lecture. God bless you

The CREATOR knows best.

Very interesting. Yet the scientific community is still saying evolution is the best explanation even though they are making use of design dynamics to make predictions. I would like to hear if materialists are putting forth any new explanations for this new engineering data and then hear a refutation. This may be a turning point for intelligent design theory. I imagine that as intelligent design gains ground there will be a correlative increase in interest and belief in aliens among the scientific materialists in order to provide the designers.

@KenJackson_US

2 жыл бұрын

Max Planck advanced his principle, something to the effect that "science advances one funeral at a time." The current crop of evolutionists professors and journal editors will never accept the truth. But as younger biologists grow and learn and replace them, they'll be more willing to accept the truth.

@ianmartinesq

2 жыл бұрын

@@KenJackson_US I was hoping it would be funerals for theories or maybe egos. I would like to think that people can change their minds while their still alive, but if that’s what Mr. Planck meant, I’m sure it was based on personal observation.

This is on another level. I went from thinking things are probably designed to Shia is the designer in 40 minutrs

Genius at work!

Very good!!

Excellent

Without evidence, Darwin's theory remains theory without evidence.

Brian needs to have a discussion with Jordan Peterson or Bret Weinstein or Joe Rogan or somebody.

It doesn't matter how much evidence can be provided for an intelligent designer, the unintelligent evolutionist will reject the facts. It is philosophical question, not a biological question.

@rockyhill9965

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly. Over at a Jerry Coyne video we would be quickly dismissed as being "uneducated creationists". There would be little room for discussion over there.

Excellent. As a programmer who deals with parameters on a daily basis, I always assumed that cells has "variables" in their genes/DNA. Now I know that I was not far off. Next on my wish list is, where is integrated behavior stored, and how are adaptations to behavior stored?

@Bomtombadi1

2 жыл бұрын

As a programmer, you can’t delineate what words describe from what they mean. You also distinguish metaphor from reality.

Every engineer who looks closely at biology will find fingerprints of the ultimate in engineering. To God goes the glory. AND thanks to DI for helping everyone appreciate this.

Very interesting. Thank you 👏💐👌 You also have visitors from other countries. We are from Iran. 😉

May God bless and protect you

In the last days, knowledge will abound and sinfulness we abound even more. I think we’ve arrived

A devine creator is the only thing that makes sense with the evidence we see. Just like Romans 1 says. 🙏🏼✝️

Read the book The story of Skygazer and cosmic miracles. It helps us understand evolution and related theories.

One wonders about the claim that there is no evidence "of entities doing any more than they need to do to continue to exist." What about prodigies in areas such as chess or music? How does Magnus Carlsen's phenomenal talent in chess relate in any way to his need to continue to exist? For that matter how does Reiss's creation of the book have anything to do with his continued need to exist? Of course we are willing to pay people for such things because we value what they do, but there is a long gap between producing the food they need to eat and their actually having that food. How does evolution mindlessly create the talent to do these things with the hope (?) that there will be someone willing to pay for them and so to enable the person to purchase food from people who actually produce it so they can survive? Would it not be more parsimonious for evolution just to produce farmers and eliminate all the uncertainty?

Very interesting. Our God is awesome!

I’m glad to see scientists opening their minds to the evidence of a creator. I hope though that they don’t automatically assume that the creative source is the god described in the Bible and presented in church. That god is just a religious construct and likely beats no resemblance at all to the actual creator.

@thstroyur

2 жыл бұрын

"That god is just a religious construct and likely beats no resemblance at all to the actual creator" And that claim carries a burden. I am glad though that you can at least appreciate the rational aspects of natural theology; hopefully the promotion of a more critical, objective and scientific view of ideas like ID will help the general 1st world, post-New Atheism public in that regard, even before they revisit their Christian roots.

still waiting for life from soup

This is because almost all of what is called science is not science it is engineering.

Darwin ONLY explained a small portion of how life begins and evolves. Definitely, a purpose and design behind it.

@candeffect

6 ай бұрын

Darwin had no clue of how life started. He had no physical evidence of of anything evolving.

As above so below, as below so above. Self similarity at all scales. All things are just one thing, remember. All we perceive is just variations on a theme. All things are either Light or !Light or derived from that, just like computer science and digital logic!!! Coincidence? hmm! I wonder....

When I took engineering in the 70s mindless biological processes did not mix. I liked biology, but didn't care for the philosophy of Darwin behind it all. I was able to differentiate between observation and speculation, but I went with the money and became an engineer.

The exhilaration I feel when I learn that those impugning the designer simply weren't "smart enough" to see how ignorant they really were (think the reverse-facing retinal cells conveying light while protecting the delicate sensors) also vindicates the unique history and methodical working of God in history. Every Bible character, every human event was known and necessary to achieve a certain end, our salvation in the glorification of Christ. The fact that there is only ONE way to "come to the Father" (John 14:6) parallels the uniqueness of biological, geological and cosmological design. We can't have it "our way" precisely because someone else has had it HIS way. All praise to Him!

The debate about evolution vs ID is merely an instance of a much wider debate: whether or not the material universe atests to a creator? Each side uses the same data to argue for different conclusions. Dawkins and company insist that "there is no evidence" in the material universe for the existence of God. On the other hand Christians (and adherents to many other religious traditions) assert that "The world is charged with the grandeur of God." (Gerard Manley Hopkins). Clearly, the raw data is not a strong determinant of whether someone will change their point of view. Rather, it is life experiences & baggage that an individual brings to the discussion that is the best predictor of how that person will interpret the data.

Yes and when have you ever found a fully formed watch in nature? If our scientists were as smart as our creator that made life then they would understand but they are like grains of sand compared to God.

So the argument against the "Designer"... Is that .."I have a PhD, therefore I'm smarter than the Designer"🤣🤣🤣...And..."while the god "natural selection" has created all these millions of species, he did so quite clumsily"🤣🤣🤣 Man these scientists or riots aren't they!?!🤣🤣🤣🤣 "Well done" to this guy ...to have been able to stop laughing long enough to get his work done!!!🤳🏋️

One of the problems with the engineering model for biology is that one must account for the fact that mosquitoes and malaria were also engineered. The combination kills millions of children. This channel does a good job presenting their case that random mutations can not explain nature. Now one must question why a loving God who loved the world so much he gave his only begotten son as a sacrifice and is all knowing would have inflicted this on mankind. This is not a question of whose fault it is, rather does the Christian and Jewish religions make sense? Explaining away the critics on the subject of Noahs Ark by saving the kinds and then an explosive diversification and world wide spread of those kinds and then saying DNA cannot change on its own is ridiculous. Science and Religion have one major thing in common. Both sides are filled with humans and both sides regardless of what they tell you believe what they want to.

Sell me a solar-panel seed . . . lets compare the cost to a plant . . . $/Watt.

Lord forgive us for being so negligently prideful . we have all sinned, we all have make light of your infinite wisdom and glory. Grant us today a humble heart and clear eyes to see that you are awesome and Holy God. impress us daily with your beauty and power that we may live.

Blessed be the Lord God, the God of Israel! Who only does wondrous things! Blessed be His glorious name forever! Let the whole earth be filled with His glory! Amen and Amen.

Note to atheist materialists: 1. You had best keep engineering concepts AWAY from you. 2. You need to spend more time and money refuting the Big Bang because that limits the amount of time for materialism to explain phenomena of all types. Sanjosemike (no longer in CA)

@markmeyer6729

2 жыл бұрын

Mike (no longer of San Jose... California being lately best viewed in the rear-view mirror, congratulations)... Some astronomers/ cosmologists and physicists have come to question secular materialism because of the apparent design of the cosmos, i.e. the implications of fine-tuning in the physics, becoming at least deists, and some coming to Christianity. Science, without materialist presuppositional baggage, leads to much evidence of order and design. To counter this, and that at a level which begins to appear as willful denial, the secularists love to spout "God of the gaps". Fine- tuning in physics, cellular complexity, DNA as coded information, irreducible complexity within cellular structures, integration of organ systems within organisms, etc., are not gaps, they are the things that are. The inference of intelligent design is rational from the things that are, the facts and data. The gaps seem more problematic for the secular materialists, for whom either evolution is a gap-filler (the incomplete fossil record... explains the missing links, but they must have existed because evolution tells us they did, so the circle goes) or "I don't know, nobody does, because of the limits of current knowledge" which a materialist seems to find satisfactory, a cognitive vacuum being acceptable as long as the possibility of a Creator (inferentially evident in the facts) is precluded from the discussion. God is not in the gaps. God is evidenced in the facts. Gaps seem to be a secular problem.

Biology has always been a design-based model. /I love God’s Intelligent Bioengineering Design

A Bit Off Topic (not that I've ever let a little thing like that stop me :-) ) IF there is No Creator and all this happened purely by random chance, and it has no meaning. I have a small question. Why did John Gotti die in prison? Remember no moral argument is allowed. Only evidence from the natural world allowed.

Why is there anything instead of nothing?😕

How to get graphene oxide out of my body after 1 jab of pfizer ???

Great stuff. Unfortunately you may have to start by defining "woman" to your students. Man has a sin problem, not an information problem. (Thanks to talks like this that anyone with a smartphone can access).

Foolishness of God... Is my video that shows that we are descendants of a superior creature

There seams to be a simularity with how God designs and how man designs. More proof that we were made in God's image!

There are lots of gods. When scientists give up and admit that life, and the universe, had to be created by a supernatural being(s), the majority of atheists will embrace theism. But that does not mean they'll turn to Christ. Very few will follow Christ. Most will put their belief in whatever pagan god that lets them continue to behave just the way they always have. And when the anti-Christ shows up, nearly everyone will believe him.

This is what the Quran preaches!

Adaptations in species happen as gradual change over an excessively long period of time. I don’t understand why the speaker kept stating that these adaptations were spontaneous.

So glad the old guard is being challenged by the new and also the enlightened old. Time to do away with dogmatic teaching and move on to actual science.

Excellent