The KJV Is Corrupt, Exposing the King James Version of the Bible

Exposing the King James Version of the Bible Narration
Website: KJVisCorrupt.com
Contents
What is the King James Version?
English Bibles prior to KJV
Geneva Bible - principal rival and motivation for the KJV
Influence of Latin and the Catholic Rheims New Testament
The KJV as divine inspiration
Interpretive bias and stylistic variation in the KJV
Inclusion of the Apocrypha
KJV not an instant success
Textural corruption of the KJV
Erasmus and Comma Johanneum
Mistranslations in the Authorized Version of 1611
KJV vs. Aramaic Peshitta
Misattribution of Hebrews to Paul
The misuse of KJV today
Integrity Syndicate Websites:
Integrity Syndicate - 1st Century Christianity - www.integritysyndicate.com
BestEnglishTranslations.com - Identifying the Best English Translations of the Bible
Apostolic Teaching Sites
lovefirst.faith - Love Comes First
EssentialGospel.faith - Understanding the core message of the Gospel
GospelOfActs.com - Discovering the Gospel of Acts
NotUnderTheLaw.net - We are not under the law (not being outside the law of God) but under the law of Christ
ApostlesDoctrine.net - Following the teaching of the Apostles
BaptismInJesusName.com - Following the original form of Christian baptism
PrayerIsNecessary.com - An overview of the importance of prayer with guidelines on how we should pray
Biblical Unitarian Sites:
trueunitarian.com/ - The foundations of Biblical Unitarianism
onegodonelord.faith/ - Understanding the distinction between one God, the Father, and one Lord, Jesus Christ
biblicalagency.com/ - Understanding the Law of Agency - A Key Biblical Concept Pertaining to Christ
onemediator.faith/ - The essential humanity of the one mediator Jesus Christ
iamstatements.com/ - Understanding how Jesus identifies himself in the Gospels
jesusisthemodel.com/ - Understanding how Jesus is the model for us
understandinglogos.com/ - The true meaning of the Word in the prologue of John
formofgod.com/ - Analysis of Philippians 2 - Exaltation not preexistence
preexistenceofchrist.com/ - Understanding in what sense Christ preexisted
bibleconflations.com/ - Refuting erroneous conflations of Scripture used to infer Jesus is ontologically God
controllinginfluence.com/ - Understanding what is the Holy Spirit
trinitydelusion.net/ - Dispelling the delusion of the Trinity
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.
#IntegritySyndicate #KJV

Пікірлер: 729

  • @JustinTime-rg7ks
    @JustinTime-rg7ks3 ай бұрын

    Thank God for William Tyndale,

  • @ishiftfocus1769
    @ishiftfocus17695 ай бұрын

    You are not saved by having a certain Bible translation on your lap, you’re saved by trusting the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ which was shed for your sins.

  • @gillamrl

    @gillamrl

    5 ай бұрын

    Sadly you do not know the power of the word.

  • @BibleU777

    @BibleU777

    4 ай бұрын

    Amen @ishiftfocus1769

  • @normanrausch1223

    @normanrausch1223

    4 ай бұрын

    A man of commonsense which is becoming rare in these days. I have read the KJV and Geneva bible and the NKJV and NASB and Living bible and l prefer the latter translations.

  • @retribution999

    @retribution999

    4 ай бұрын

    No, you are saved by regeneration. Being born again.

  • @timskaggs9960

    @timskaggs9960

    2 ай бұрын

    If it's an inaccurate translation like niv then yeah a bad context can be detrimental

  • @AntoinetheDisciple3075
    @AntoinetheDisciple30759 ай бұрын

    So long story short, the Geneva Bible help you out in understanding the Scriptures which went against king James agenda so they rejected the Geneva Bible, and translated the king James, the way that they thought it should be translated based on their agenda in their thoughts and opinions

  • @THEBESTINTEREST-ne1hp

    @THEBESTINTEREST-ne1hp

    7 ай бұрын

    compare the two bible

  • @karlyost3572

    @karlyost3572

    Ай бұрын

    You're trying to sell the people the other one because it's from the Catholic Virgin and not the two testament that God wants us to read The Catholic there's no such thing as Portuguese and drunk like that trust the King James it's the only Bible that God wants us to have for now he authorized it and that's good bless you in Jesus name Amen 🙏💖🙏

  • @AntiBluepill

    @AntiBluepill

    16 күн бұрын

    It's changed to fit modern English. Compare the two. It wasn't changed as is claimed.

  • @PETERJOHN101
    @PETERJOHN10110 ай бұрын

    The KJV and Geneva translations are the best English translated bibles in existence. The Alexandrian manuscripts, however, are corrupted.

  • @private-nobody6667

    @private-nobody6667

    8 ай бұрын

    One may want to check into Brandon Peterson, who has established through English numerics that the KJV is God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics, not even Geneva: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist -- people say numbers don't lie ... Brandon has a lot of free resources that proves the point that he shares with the World. God's hand was on the KJV, no doubt.

  • @henrylaurel1188

    @henrylaurel1188

    6 ай бұрын

    How are the Alexandrian manuscripts corrupted? Sweeping statement with no evidence. The usual lies of the KJV only cult.

  • @TexasHoosier3118

    @TexasHoosier3118

    5 ай бұрын

    Can you prove that statement?

  • @eastmanresearch3143

    @eastmanresearch3143

    4 ай бұрын

    bingo.

  • @jimdee9801

    @jimdee9801

    3 ай бұрын

    ​@@TexasHoosier3118the siniaticus claims to be over 1000 years old but as one noted scholar remarked- its appearance looked too pristine. There are many references in older church father wtitings which show the Textus Receptus version includes many if not all of the omitted passages in Akexandrian and Siniaticus. Ergo Alexandrian texts have been proven to be corrupted

  • @christianprepper939
    @christianprepper93910 ай бұрын

    A LOT of people have gotten converted over the years using the King James Version Bible. The authors of this video are "oneness" "Jesus Only" people, but if there is no Trinity why did Jesus Christ pray to His Father on several occasions?

  • @timoromeo7663

    @timoromeo7663

    5 ай бұрын

    A lot of people have also went to hell because false teachers, preachers dont know how to rightly divide scripture, and lead people astray. Satan is crafty. Religion is all the different ways to go to hell. 1 Cor.15:1-4 is the Gospel of our Salvation and Ephesians 1:10-14 is our assurance. Jesus didn’t say “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only son, that whosoever joins a church, pays tithes, gets baptised, does good works, adds to the finished work of the cross, and believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life”.

  • @mandandi

    @mandandi

    4 ай бұрын

    Funny question. If I am not my father and mother, then why do I talk to my father on the phone on several occasions? Because I am not my father,. Otherwise, I would talk to myself.

  • @mrg466

    @mrg466

    4 ай бұрын

    There is no Trinity! Plus Jesus isn't God either!

  • @christianprepper939

    @christianprepper939

    4 ай бұрын

    NONSENSE!@@mrg466

  • @KevMich

    @KevMich

    4 ай бұрын

    @@mrg466You will one day regret this. I hope and pray you find peace within yourself and ask Jesus to show you who he really is. There’s one thing for certain, every single atheist who took their very last breath no longer became an atheist once it’s too late to repent

  • @frederickanderson1860
    @frederickanderson1860 Жыл бұрын

    The preface of the translator's are missing in many kjv bibles. They admitted that its not the perfect version. They lauded other previous translations.

  • @private-nobody6667

    @private-nobody6667

    8 ай бұрын

    One may want to check out Brandon Peterson, who has proved through English numerics that the KJV is indeed God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist

  • @henrylaurel1188

    @henrylaurel1188

    6 ай бұрын

    Exactly the KJV translators would not be KJV only. They would not have been deceived by the KJV idolatry.

  • @DouglasNicholson-ff6ep

    @DouglasNicholson-ff6ep

    2 ай бұрын

    Really? Who told you that they admitted it is flawed? I'd run from that blind guide!

  • @frederickanderson1860

    @frederickanderson1860

    2 ай бұрын

    @@DouglasNicholson-ff6ep the translators admitted its not perfect,and they accepted other translations .

  • @DouglasNicholson-ff6ep

    @DouglasNicholson-ff6ep

    2 ай бұрын

    @@frederickanderson1860 So, when did they admit this to you directly? Or are you going on hearsay, propaganda?

  • @bobbyadkins6983
    @bobbyadkins698311 ай бұрын

    The devil sure hates the KJV. But thanks to God, His Word is preserved.

  • @KJBTRUTH

    @KJBTRUTH

    10 ай бұрын

    Amen!!!!!!

  • @LostinParadise03

    @LostinParadise03

    9 ай бұрын

    1560 Geneva Bible solos 🥱😂

  • @private-nobody6667

    @private-nobody6667

    8 ай бұрын

    One may want to check into Brandon Peterson, who has established through English numerics that the KJV is God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist -- people say numbers don't lie ... Brandon has a lot of free resources that proves the point that he shares with the World.

  • @JudeOne3Four

    @JudeOne3Four

    7 ай бұрын

    😂🤦🏽🤦‍♀️

  • @bobbyadkins6983

    @bobbyadkins6983

    7 ай бұрын

    @@JudeOne3Four The KJV Bible lets us know that your response is rude and of the devil.

  • @Christ-is-the-Lord33
    @Christ-is-the-Lord335 ай бұрын

    yikes. let God be true but every man a liar

  • @blackdog5186
    @blackdog51864 ай бұрын

    I don’t think the King James Bible is corrupted, though he was displeased reading the notes of the Geneva Bible. He authorized a translation of the holy Bible from the original tongues and he compared former translations along with the 1560 Geneva version

  • @o0o_OutCast_o0o

    @o0o_OutCast_o0o

    7 күн бұрын

    I was amazed at the Geneva bible being the first study bible. It wasn't until 1901, I think, when Schofield did a study bible. I need to rewatch the video where I saw this.

  • @blackholesun9068
    @blackholesun90685 ай бұрын

    Quit worshiping the Bible! The Spirit can show you salvation with any relevant Bible.

  • @madmaxx5612
    @madmaxx56123 ай бұрын

    Wasn't king james a gay tyrant.... Why would his book be followed

  • @makeitjim5570
    @makeitjim55703 ай бұрын

    kjv is the pure word of God✝️🙏🔥⚡️👑

  • @bigtobacco1098

    @bigtobacco1098

    18 күн бұрын

    It adds words

  • @makeitjim5570

    @makeitjim5570

    17 күн бұрын

    @@bigtobacco1098 what bible do you use?

  • @bigtobacco1098

    @bigtobacco1098

    17 күн бұрын

    @@makeitjim5570 the kjv, esv, nasb, original niv, rsv, Greek, Hebrew

  • @gerhardpelser6277
    @gerhardpelser627720 күн бұрын

    Thank you Jesus, this integrity syndicate, just confirmed for the thousands time, how precious my King James Bible is. Thank you, my LORD and SAVIOR. All hail KING JESUS. AMEN

  • @sanyihegedu
    @sanyihegedu17 күн бұрын

    "CORRUPT" is a very broad accusation. Is there a text which contradicts Christ's teachings?

  • @jamessheffield4173
    @jamessheffield4173 Жыл бұрын

    Why some have problems with Reasoned eclecticism. I John 5:7 is found in a majority of the Latin, but not the Greek so out it goes. Good will towards men Doxology in Matthew Without cause God manifest in the flesh Are a majority in the Greek but not in the Latin, so out they go The PA and Mark 16:9-20 are a majority in both the Greek and Latin so out they go. Even the “not yet” found in the two of the earliest(P66.P75) in John 7:8 some throw out. If as an orthodox Christian you don't see a problem, what would you see as a problem?

  • @wrkndude1
    @wrkndude1 Жыл бұрын

    I’ve got both versions. The best marginal notes in a Bible in my opinion would be the appendixes in E W Bullinger companion Bible

  • @nobux717

    @nobux717

    Жыл бұрын

    I have the E W Bullinger companion Bible too. :)

  • @TheBinaryWolf

    @TheBinaryWolf

    11 ай бұрын

    ​@@nobux717Bullinger was a brilliant scholar. His lexicon is a treasure. That he produced so many aids to finding what terms meant in the time they were written without the aid of a computer is impressive.

  • @wendybart8409
    @wendybart840923 күн бұрын

    I fell in love with Jesus reading the KJV

  • @bigtobacco1098

    @bigtobacco1098

    18 күн бұрын

    Your experience must be universal 😅😅😅😅

  • @theservant752
    @theservant7525 ай бұрын

    e-sword has 1611kjv and 1587geneva combine with regular kjv+ with strongs dictionary... that is what i like, and throw in the ESV to for a laugh.. e-sword also has the Geneva notes in the commentary section, it is possible to use the KJV and have the Geneva notes with it.

  • @Meowwolfwarrior

    @Meowwolfwarrior

    3 ай бұрын

    Kjv+ on e-sword has the Greek koine. Very good ❤

  • @Rod-Wheeler

    @Rod-Wheeler

    2 ай бұрын

    If you read the preface to the 1611 KJV the translators themselves said the KJV was not perfect.

  • @WarriorforJesusChrist-oi5tv
    @WarriorforJesusChrist-oi5tv3 ай бұрын

    Then what Bible should we use for our modern day if not the KJV there’s so many translations out there nowadays it’s hard to know which is best 😢

  • @Meowwolfwarrior

    @Meowwolfwarrior

    3 ай бұрын

    Faith in God will do it ❤

  • @ethiehetherington5086

    @ethiehetherington5086

    3 ай бұрын

    Go to the Catholic books store and get yourself the "Douay-Rhems" bible, because it has a 73 books in it or the" Geneva" bible or the "Tyndale" or Standard bible.

  • @DouglasNicholson-ff6ep

    @DouglasNicholson-ff6ep

    2 ай бұрын

    A subtle way to say, "I hate the KJV" is to say "I'm not KJV only". What do YOU (anti KJV only) folks in the KJV only, that convicts you?

  • @Meowwolfwarrior

    @Meowwolfwarrior

    2 ай бұрын

    @@DouglasNicholson-ff6ep the fact that the niv removed over 60,000+ words is not a good sign in itself, if you had a document that possibly would weigh the chance of your eternal soul, wouldn't you want the most of the message available? I would

  • @DouglasNicholson-ff6ep

    @DouglasNicholson-ff6ep

    2 ай бұрын

    @@Meowwolfwarrior Your question "seems" sincere. I'm 45 years since rebirth. 24 years since baptized in the Holy Spirit, & gifted with discerning of spirits (1 Cor. 12:10 KJV) For me, frankly it's a slam dunk. EVERY time ANYONE quotes ANYTHING that's "supposed to be" on behalf of God's SPIRIT ...But isn't..... Men like myself with this gift.. KNOW IT. "GOD IS SPIRIT" We discern spirits. It's a perfect gift, in we imperfect men Are you aware the KJV is the only bible permitted in America till 1971. I am because I was 12 at the time. Are you are the KJV in the only bible that men don't claim to have inspired of themselves ...evidenced by THEIR copyright claims,!? My advice to all male sincere seekers... BYPASS ALL videos, all podcasts, all sermons, all teachings, all pulpits, all alleged prophets, all theological experts, all textual critics, all denominational dogma . And go to God The Father DIRECTLY, through "the curtain that was wrent from top to bottom" .... The curtain which sppatated all men from mertingsuth The Holy One directly ... the curtain ,(division) that only the high pries, once a yeart could enter to meet God directly. until Christ made the way for US ALL... Ask Him DIRECTLY, if the KJV really is inspired by him! God says if YOU seek Him you WILL find Him, WHEN...WHEN YOU (personally seek Him with your WHOLE heart"

  • @lovepeace7346
    @lovepeace73465 ай бұрын

    Why are 4 different words mistranslated into hell?

  • @terryglovier5803
    @terryglovier58036 ай бұрын

    Im curious why Mat 28:19 wasn't mentioned as being added and not inspired by God

  • @TexasHoosier3118

    @TexasHoosier3118

    5 ай бұрын

    Matthew 28:19 is not missing in any of the early manuscripts that have an ending for Matthew. It is supposed to be there.

  • @billducker7404
    @billducker740418 күн бұрын

    Do you speak Hebrew and Koine Greek? Do you not think Lancelot Andrews and the other scholars didn’t know these and other languages? May The Lord open your eyes sir! Bill. Uk

  • @antoneczek-_-606
    @antoneczek-_-6062 жыл бұрын

    Very informative. A lot of stress on the Alexandrian family, which is the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus: which of course was preserved by the Popes. Maybe that says enough about that. It does not appear that any translation is perfect but KJV does have advantages over many modern translations. The Geneva 1560 is a even better one in my opinion.

  • @jamiebatchelor3037

    @jamiebatchelor3037

    2 жыл бұрын

    Hello! What do you think about the 1599 edition of the Geneva Bible? do you have experience with it? if so what version would you say is the best, 1560 or 1599? Thanks! Jamie.

  • @silveriorebelo2920

    @silveriorebelo2920

    10 ай бұрын

    yeah, we already know you are a bigotted anti-catholic

  • @Obediah002

    @Obediah002

    9 ай бұрын

    Yes, and the Alexandrian family, so few and dubious as it is is quite leavened. Thee KJV has the HS in the very text, study it and see for self. Look at Isaiah 53:8 compare KJV to several other modern versions note contradictory translations. Look up too FROM & PRISON note how Hebrew words here have been translated elsewhere in OT as THROUGH & OPPRESSION; and what does taken from judgment mean- look up Acts 8:33 KJV here compare leavened versions here too. Consider Proverbs 25:2 here carefully, what does He glory in doing?

  • @henrylaurel1188

    @henrylaurel1188

    6 ай бұрын

    ​@@Obediah002Since when was the KJV the standard? Where is the scripture that supports the KJV only teaching? Why would any honest Bible student compare modern translations to the KJV? Would that not be falling for the double standards and lies of the KJV only cult?

  • @n9wff

    @n9wff

    4 ай бұрын

    "Preserved"??? More hidden and rewritten. If that Vaticanus and Sinaiticus was the "preserved" Word of God: Why don't they agree with each other? One would think if both came from Alexandria (which was gnostic in the region), they wouldn't have all those errors and some see that is was tried to be copied over. Even scholars have no idea the possible origin of the Codex Vaticanus. Why did God allow it to be hidden for so long? That is saying God has mislead Christians for over 1000 years. As far as the one I have been ability to study with the Holy Spirit's leading, KJV by far.

  • @hillbillyheadcam1729
    @hillbillyheadcam17295 ай бұрын

    One thing that has always stood out to me is how could a man of God ever put his name first on Gods Holy Bible? Think on that Kjv only peeps. Its King Jesus Bible!

  • @timoromeo7663

    @timoromeo7663

    5 ай бұрын

    Maybe he was a man used by GOD. Peep.

  • @steveKJV1611

    @steveKJV1611

    5 ай бұрын

    Ecclesiastes 8:4 Where the word of a king is, there is power: and who may say unto him, What doest thou? Peep 🙂

  • @lesdavies6846

    @lesdavies6846

    4 ай бұрын

    Absolutely......but no more than say those arrogant Swiss, naming a bible after one of their cantons ! 🤔😉

  • @jimdee9801

    @jimdee9801

    3 ай бұрын

    That's silly. It's only a means of identifying which translation you are reading. Next?

  • @simplechristian1

    @simplechristian1

    Ай бұрын

    Actual king James never called it king James bible that came many many years later. Traditionally its been called the authorized version

  • @sparkysmalarkey
    @sparkysmalarkeyАй бұрын

    In my 41 years, 'interpretation' and 'convenience' are some of the most terrifying words in the English language.

  • @Jerry-vx2kj
    @Jerry-vx2kj7 ай бұрын

    Thank God I'm using the perfect Bible.. the KJV.

  • @Doctor1933

    @Doctor1933

    7 ай бұрын

    kzread.infoBHNQGv4EvQw?si=RREsC-88ySsowbnI

  • @bradhays5961

    @bradhays5961

    6 ай бұрын

    WOW!!! I was wondering if you actually listened to the video???? I am thinking not!!!! It completely undermines and brings into question the reliability, accuracy and usefulness of the KJV!! But yeah go ahead and keep right on thinking and believing what is not true.. it is an epidemic in today’s world!

  • @ghernandez2263

    @ghernandez2263

    5 ай бұрын

    Say the Americas that can’t even learn basic Spanish much less Greek/Hebrew to understand how badly translated the KJV is 😂

  • @pakaliccyber7433

    @pakaliccyber7433

    5 ай бұрын

    Septuagint LXX is the oldest used around 500 bce - 300 ce (even Jesus used to quote from it) KJV comes from Masoretic texts, 850 ce, which was corrupted by roman pagans.

  • @SketchyGhettoSpic

    @SketchyGhettoSpic

    5 ай бұрын

    ​@@pakaliccyber7433 The Masoretic is in the original Hebrew. The Septuagint would make your Bible a translation of a translation, which makes your Bible useless.

  • @rodneyjackson6181
    @rodneyjackson6181 Жыл бұрын

    I do not believe the KJV nor the Geneva Bible are corrupt. Both camps who favor one or the other make these accusations. I realize that the KJV was mandated by James for political reasons because he hated the Geneva Bible because of its commentary notes. Both of them are from the TR and somewhat similar, so accusing both translations as being corrupt is ridiculous.

  • @anointedone4775

    @anointedone4775

    Жыл бұрын

    The king James bible and Geneva bible is not just corrupt but also misleading,as a matter of fact the original scriptures were just that scriptures not Latin biblica.These bibles are loaded with pagan words and they do not contain the true Aramaic- Hebrew names of the father and son, but instead is replaced with pagan name jesus-hail zeus, pagan titles Lord-baal and God-Lucifer,history is there for all and you can google some of what I have typed here for yourself,these biblias- Latin were written for Christians Catholics but humanity due to lack of studying the word sctiptures or searching for truth majority followed after Constantine's made up Christian religion and study's from those biblias Latin, instead of the original Aramaic Hebrew version which contains the original writings of the quodeshims (holy ones).This is why only a remnant will be saved, because it only a remnant that will know the truth and be set free from that truth.

  • @PETERJOHN101

    @PETERJOHN101

    10 ай бұрын

    The KJV and Geneva translations are the best English translated bibles in existence. The Alexandrian manuscripts, however, are corrupted.

  • @rodneyjackson6181

    @rodneyjackson6181

    10 ай бұрын

    @@PETERJOHN101 Nothing personal brother. I respectfully disagree. The Alexandrian manuscripts being corrupt is old accusations by King James or TR onlyists. There is no proof to back those accusations up not when they agree with the TR and Majority Text 94 to 98.5 percent of the time. And where there are textual variants between all three, it changes no doctrine at all.

  • @PETERJOHN101

    @PETERJOHN101

    10 ай бұрын

    @@rodneyjackson6181 I have discussed the issue with bible translators and looked carefully at the evidence. The Majority Text agrees better with early Church writings. The Coptic derived Alexandrian codices, once believed to be older, are in fact of a later origin. The Byzantine manuscript also appears to be free of Gnostic influences common to early Egyptian culture.

  • @rodneyjackson6181

    @rodneyjackson6181

    10 ай бұрын

    @@PETERJOHN101 the King James is not from the Majority Text. Its from the Received Text. The Majority and Received Texts are different. There are in fact about 800 differences between the Received Text and the Majority Text. The KJV, NKJV and Geneva are Received Text translations. They are not Majority Text. The things you said about the Alexandrian manuscripts are not factual but King James only misinformation that has been parroted for many years that has already been debunked.

  • @endoftheagereality
    @endoftheagerealityАй бұрын

    Truly this contested subject should have ended long, long ago. Instead the debate endures when the answer to it was declared long, long ago. Think about it !! In just about all of our ecclesiastical doctrinal statement's - ( Church manual's ) - the concept of inerrancy of the "Scripture" is addressed. This statement is declared something to this effect. " We believe the original "manuscripts" were inerrant in their conception." The corresponding action to this in our time presents itself as no less a task. This is not to say perverted or corrupted translation's do not exist, and such a mind set in this hour seems popular and tempting as marketing exists today. Yet, thankfully "God" has declared that "HIS" Word" will forever be preserved eternally. So it is my contention that the mature among the "Body of Christ" be accountable here. We have been given a sound mind and mouth to counsel concerning this. It is us that has been charged with the responsibility of discipleship. Experience and reasoning with one another will go along way in settling this "hodge-podge" issue, remember a contentious spirit remains where it is at. With "God'' maintaining "HIS" Word, and with a rating of around 98 percent agreement between the "Text's," we should have be less saber rattling and truly be more grateful for what we have. We are so blessed as many of our believing family member's around the world are fortunate to own 1 page of "Holy Writing." We must never forget this "spirit-realm- reality. "Grace is "Gods ability and willingness to do for us what we cannot do for ourselves. Therefore grace never leaves us where it found us."

  • @dannyboyakadandaman504furl9
    @dannyboyakadandaman504furl92 жыл бұрын

    Thank you!!!

  • @MericaBack2backWWChampions
    @MericaBack2backWWChampions Жыл бұрын

    king James is in hell? Revelation 22:18-19 I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book, and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book

  • @private-nobody6667

    @private-nobody6667

    8 ай бұрын

    But check into Brandon Peterson's work, who has established through English numerics that the KJV is God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist -- people say numbers don't lie ... Brandon has a lot of free resources that proves the point that he shares with the World.

  • @MericaBack2backWWChampions

    @MericaBack2backWWChampions

    8 ай бұрын

    @@private-nobody6667 I've seen his work. Honestly you can find patterns with numbers in anything if you look and try hard enough.

  • @private-nobody6667

    @private-nobody6667

    8 ай бұрын

    @@MericaBack2backWWChampions Nope, that's a conclusory statement without evidence in support; you have to prove that. You said you had seen Brandon's work, did you see all of it with understanding? i did many years of research with Greek and Hebrew numerics, and only KJV has discernable patterns; NONE of the other versions do, not even NKJV. And Brandon, through the insights given to him, was able to show for this generation God's seal of approval of the true Word of God in English, and not the word of Satan attempting to diminish the effectiveness of God's ordained word of truth and He did it with English this time. Under the Rules of evidence, a conclusory statement without supporting evidence is no evidence at all. Can you cite any works that have those patterns in Hebrew, Greek, and English languages like the KJV has with overwhelming proof that is undisputed? Proof matters, not opinions. Peace be with you ...

  • @LovelyBreakingWaves-no6ex

    @LovelyBreakingWaves-no6ex

    3 ай бұрын

    I agree with you!

  • @drketoslenderman
    @drketoslenderman2 күн бұрын

    Corrupt because primitive machines in 1611 aren't perfect at printing everything?

  • @kevinlee5753
    @kevinlee575326 күн бұрын

    Perhaps the kjv does have some problems but the modern texts which didnt even exist until they were made definitely have more problems than the kjv.

  • @Broomful
    @Broomful2 жыл бұрын

    I have this version of the bible Thank you for making this where can i get the true and accurate versions of the bible and what are their names

  • @IntegritySyndicate

    @IntegritySyndicate

    2 жыл бұрын

    BestEnglishTranslations.com - Identifying the Best English Translations of the Bible. Much Love!

  • @TheBinaryWolf

    @TheBinaryWolf

    11 ай бұрын

    I am a Bible translator and recommend the NKJV, which translation is quite faithful as translations go. The NIV is easier to read but adds 15% of interpretation, which any Christian should find objectionable. The cost of smoothing out a rendering in any language is right theology.

  • @private-nobody6667

    @private-nobody6667

    8 ай бұрын

    One may want to check out Brandon Peterson, who has proved through English numerics that the KJV is indeed God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist

  • @Praise___YaH

    @Praise___YaH

    5 ай бұрын

    @@IntegritySyndicate - Here is The Savior YaH The Heavenly FATHER (Genesis 1) HIMSELF was Who they Crucified/Pierced for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF” From the Ancient Semitic: "Yad He Vav He" is what Moshe (Moses) wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3) Ancient Semitic Direct Translation Yad - "Behold The Hand" He - "Behold the Breath" Vav - "Behold The NAIL"

  • @sanalouis2620

    @sanalouis2620

    5 ай бұрын

    @@TheBinaryWolfNIV taking away a lot of verses in the bible

  • @CBDEnglish
    @CBDEnglishАй бұрын

    Good work. Thank you very much for this valuable presentation.

  • @edaguirre8952
    @edaguirre8952Ай бұрын

    How many people have been saved because of the KJV? That's important.

  • @Nanster-gv8nf
    @Nanster-gv8nf3 ай бұрын

    tell me more...my ears are itching...

  • @osuclassof88
    @osuclassof8810 ай бұрын

    hahaha, the footnotes were threats to monarchy

  • @wluke5136
    @wluke51363 ай бұрын

    Lies that have been told to imprison people.

  • @joseph906
    @joseph9062 жыл бұрын

    People with dogmas have crazy arguments. I've heard before someone defend the use of the word "Easter" in Acts 12. The defense was something like "The KJV translators were learned men, they knew that Passover has already passed, hence why they translated it as Easter instead".

  • @antoneczek-_-606

    @antoneczek-_-606

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@MichaelTheophilus906 Geneva says Passover. Tyndale Bible, Coverdale Bible, Matthew's Bible, Great Bible, Easter, Wycliffe Pask.

  • @joseph906

    @joseph906

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@MichaelTheophilus906 not sure. But its a dogmatic statement by KJVonlyists.

  • @christianchickpeajesussaves

    @christianchickpeajesussaves

    Жыл бұрын

    Actually easter is disguise for the ancient goddess worship of ISHTAR. eggs at Easter arr representative of fertility as those who worshiped idols like fertility gods....the devil perverts God's holidays, his word his everything. HALLOWEEN is evil ND should. Not be celebrated by children especially nor adults. Christmas is focus on money and material goods which was worship of nimrod and just tlike they offer gits to him on or under. Tree , so did many sacrifice their children to idols and "gods"....think about it!!!!!! ND IF YOU HAVENT NOTICED usually August, Sept October leading up to Halloween (devils nigh) there's usually a world wide troubling thing like murder...one year it's chris watts another it's Bryan laundry ...there is some satanic stuff leading up to Halloween...note the patterns of these things and easy to see the evil. But we must be simple concerning evil being wise in Good and God and truth. But we are to be wise of the enemy's tactics with all discernment and prayers 🙏

  • @steveneurwyn

    @steveneurwyn

    Жыл бұрын

    Easter was a separate pagan holiday celebrated in the Roman Empire during the time. Painting eggs in the blood of child sacrifice for their fertility goddess, doing other pagan rituals. This holiday is rooted back to the Babylonian Ishtar. Note that this is a pagan feast. Jesus' crucifiction was on Passover. John 19:13-14 (KJV) When Pilate therefore heard that saying, he brought Jesus forth, and sat down in the judgment seat in a place that is called the Pavement, but in the Hebrew, Gabbatha. And it was the preparation of the passover, and about the sixth hour: and he saith unto the Jews, Behold your King! Note that this is a Jewish feast. Acts 12 talks about Herod the Roman backed king persecuting Peter. Herod's plan was to bring forth Peter to the people after the pagan Roman holiday of Easter, not the Jewish Passover. The Catholic Church just rebranded Easter as a 'Christian' thing when it is actually not. To this very day, the Catholics' Easter do not coincide with the Jewish Passover. These are two separate days being observed. That's just from the difference between Passover and Easter perspective. Next, timeframe. Passover is already long gone by the time we reach Acts 12. Acts 12:3 (KJV) And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also. (Then were the days of unleavened bread.) Note Unleavened Bread. The Feast of Unleavened Bread is being celebrated in that passage. This is: Leviticus 23:4-6 (KJV) These are the feasts of the LORD, even holy convocations, which ye shall proclaim in their seasons. In the fourteenth day of the first month at even is the LORD'S passover. And on the fifteenth day of the same month is the feast of unleavened bread unto the LORD: seven days ye must eat unleavened bread. Passover, and THEN 7 days of Unleavened Bread. If Herod was waiting to bring forth Peter after Passover, it looks like he could have done it right away. It's already Unleavened Bread. Unless.. there is an entirely different feast celebrated by non-Jews and non-Christians unrelated to Passover that is close enough that happened during or after the Unleavened Bread. Oh look what we have here. Turns out there is this thing called Easter that the pagans in ancient Rome celebrated within that exact timeframe. I hope that our pagan backed Roman puppet king doesn't celebrate it.

  • @joseph906

    @joseph906

    Жыл бұрын

    Problem is Passover and Days of Unleavened Bread are used interchangeably. I believe Matthew calls the day of Preparation the first day of Unleavened Bread. This is the type of familiar or casual language we use today. For instance, when its December 20 or December 27, people typically say its Christmas, even though Christmas are technically on the 25th. If Matthew calls the day of Preparation the first day of Unleavened Bread, then Luke can use similar language as well. Passover and Unleavened Bread are the same feast. Passover can mean the days of Unleavened Bread. Also, technically speaking, the 14th is the preparation of the passover. The passover technically starts on the 15th and continues for 7 days. That's why the 14th are called the preparation of the passover. There's a parallel between the "unblemished" lamb and the "Unleavened bread". It represents the same thing. Hence Passover and Unleavened Bread are interchangeably. Lastly, the author literally says Passover, not Easter. So if you are arguing that the KJV is correct, then you are mistaken, with all sincerity.

  • @TheKingdomIsComing
    @TheKingdomIsComing Жыл бұрын

    Such an old argument....what does it matter....all religion is used for three purposes... 1. maintain control over the minds and actions of the people. 2. Maintain the income of those in power. 3. Maintain total power over the population.

  • @Learningthetruth7
    @Learningthetruth7Ай бұрын

    Thank you so, so much. He was an occultist and freemason. He built the first Masonic Temple and also regularly kept men in his bedchamber.

  • @TheBinaryWolf
    @TheBinaryWolf11 ай бұрын

    All translations have shortcomings. For instance, in Mt.16:18, all translators mistranslate the preposition, epi, as "on," when it is in the dative case and should be rendered as "with." The same construct (dative/indirect object) appears in Mt. 18:26, where it is correctly translated as "with." We have so many Bible teachers today, but few scholars; and, as Paul exhorted the Corinthians, we even fewer "fathers," meaning few that effectively evangelize.

  • @muskyoxes

    @muskyoxes

    10 ай бұрын

    You're saying that every biblical Greek scholar is dumber than a first year student. What is the _real_ reason they translated it that way? It has to be something other than being unable to see a dative case

  • @TheBinaryWolf

    @TheBinaryWolf

    10 ай бұрын

    @@muskyoxes Your skepticism is quite understandable. But such anomalies are not rare, according to Professor Maurice Robinsin, editor of the Brown-Briggs-Driver Hebrew Lexicon, a professor of mine that pointed out no less than 15% of errors in the NIV. "Put not your faith in men," says God in Holy Writ. So I encourage you to invest in an interlinear Greek-English NT. The literal translation by Dr. Alfred Marshall is one of the better publications. In it, the literal translation of the original text appears in English. And if you have enough intellectual curiosity, you will add the Analytical Greek New Testament by Friberg and Friberg, wherein the grammatical construct of each term in the Bible is identified. Thus, you can bypass much of the filtering, rather than depend on well-meaning but so oft bias of fallible men. Translations vary, but not the NT Greek text books, which ALL teach that the dative case (indirect object of the verb) is never translated as "on." I think because epi appears in the genitive case almost always that translators over looked the dative. Perhaps they got it right in Mt.18:26 is because the preposition is contracted, which caught their eye. I myself had been guilty of the same error...until I was teaching a class on Greek prepositions and chanced upon Mt.16:18. If you truly wish to know the truth, you will research the matter further, without which a cloud of doubt will always remain. If I can be of any help, I will do my best for you.

  • @muskyoxes

    @muskyoxes

    10 ай бұрын

    @@TheBinaryWolf I didn't barge in here because i know anything, but because your comment sounded to me like "the entire community flunked a first year grammar question", which is a very different claim than "people make mistakes". After vague searching, this does not seem like a basic issue. I can see reams of definitions for ἐπὶ linked from an online interlinear, even just in their dative section. And i see a suggestion that case distinctions for ἐπὶ started getting blurred after the classical period. And i see "ἐπὶ + dative => 'locative' dative => point in space or time at which the predication is offered" which doesn't sound like either "on" or "with" to me.

  • @TheBinaryWolf

    @TheBinaryWolf

    10 ай бұрын

    @@muskyoxes Until you are fluent in an inflected language, the issue at hand will remain a mystery to you. It is no accident that God chose Greek to convey His truth to all other languages. It is by far the most expressive, with a unique perfect and aorist tense, middle voice snd syntax that communicstes as much meaning and the words. Those who are ignorant of the latter are destined to mistranslate the repographs, evidenced by so many lame "translations." As I mentioned, the dative epi in Mt.16:18 should be rendered as it is in the identical construct of Mt.18:26. But I think the bridge between us is too great; for I am persuaded that even if the apostle Matthew appeared to you with the same exposition, you would still hold on to the dative as a genitive.

  • @muskyoxes

    @muskyoxes

    10 ай бұрын

    @@TheBinaryWolf You don't seem to know there's a gigantic difference between "the entire expert community is wrong" and "the entire expert community is trivially wrong"

  • @betsydonato6817
    @betsydonato68172 ай бұрын

    Integrity syndicate ? - In the 15th Century the Geneva format was still in the throws of establishing top left and right english in order to properly navigate the Saintly Clause secret of the " I AM that ( which ) i am ". In the beginning was the verbatim of God, but up through the line of David to the Aaronic Levitical Tribe, the Christ wouldn't take the lower case " t " for the supplication of Simon to preserve the homonym clause until he wed Lady Wisdom at age 33. Martin Luther was the Catalyst for the deaf, dumb, and blind and those fully facilitated with all their senses. But the miracle of prophecy came from the deaf, dumb, and blind cathartic to statues, stained glass, crucifix, and Rosary props that the priests passed the plate and missed the grail on as far as understanding spiritual and physical things and how object should not take precedence over Holy predicated subject. In other words, we can't sell material things to attract a congregation for money, to save our soul...we have to take up our cross, and sell Jesus in ourselves. The name of the Lord is a strong tower:....................................................

  • @richardmayers6049
    @richardmayers60492 ай бұрын

    He is not king james😢

  • @RiceVillatoro
    @RiceVillatoro29 күн бұрын

    The KJV has saved more souls than any other translation. I use the KJV but I also have another Bible I use which is a side-by-side Bible that has the NIV and the amplified bible all in one book. God will not allow His Word to be corrupt and the translations which are corrupted are the 'paraphrase' translation bibles which are incredibly obvious and blasphemous. The Catholic church hates the KJV so I go with that. But just like The Lord used a donkey to speak, He can use any translation to convey His message to us. The important thing is to believe in Jesaus, that he died and rose again for our sins, and so far these other translations do not contradict that but when in doubt, I always have my KJV handy, at arms length. They killed William Tyndale for translating the Bible, and killed thousands of Christians throughout the centuries. How can anybody with half a brain not see that the Catholic church is of the devil??? They can never get rid of the KJV.

  • @mrg466
    @mrg4663 ай бұрын

    To you the video maker...now your removing comments?

  • @normmcinnis4102
    @normmcinnis4102Ай бұрын

    A last days attack.

  • @marystout1606
    @marystout160611 ай бұрын

    Time to get the truth out! Great job, keep these coming!

  • @backtothealtarofGod
    @backtothealtarofGod3 ай бұрын

    I use the Orthodox study Bible. I have the KJV but lot of books were taken out. The OSB has all the books.

  • @blainvance409
    @blainvance409Күн бұрын

    Once again, God's Word comes under attack. Have you not studied the vast multitude of numerical miracles that occur only in the KJV. Pray and ask the Holy Spirit to lead you into all truth.

  • @jimdee9801
    @jimdee98013 ай бұрын

    This video is designed to cast doubt on the KJV - its tone is trying to appropiate a sense of objective reason when in fact its claims are deceptions and have been roundly been addressed by the most recent studies

  • @piplol9811

    @piplol9811

    Ай бұрын

    Examples

  • @unknown_amazing_chap4480
    @unknown_amazing_chap448014 күн бұрын

    I don't judge, nor do I hate, people who read other Bible versions. You can read which ever book you want to read. I don't even argue about it. In fact my friends and family all read their own preferred Bible versions and that's okay. But I do take my own christianity and salvation very serious. I am a Word of God Onlyist. Therefore I only read the King James Version. I personally choose the KJV because I am a Word of God Onlyist and the King James Version is the pure, true word of God in English. I only choose God's word. Not man's word. The other versions are merely men and publishing companies trying to interpret in their own words, through the scope and filters of their own opinions and beliefs and also with their own added footnotes what they think it is that God is saying. To me, that is not good enough. I want God's words, period and I am not interested in man's opinion. The King James Version, on the other hand, is a direct word for word translation from the Original Arimaic and Greek manuscripts. That means that it says exactly in English, word for word, what it is that God is actually saying. And it does so without man's opinion or added footnotes. That's what separates the King James Version from all the other so called "Bibles" on this earth and that is why the King James Version is the pure and perfect word of God.

  • @sophianelson5390
    @sophianelson53908 күн бұрын

    Wow! I am shocked by all these comments on the different versions of the Bible. How rude some people are about God. A God that is literally the very essence of LOVE. Whether one uses the Geneva Bible, the Ethiopian Bible, the KJV Bible or any other Bible, if it won the hearts of men who cares which version it is. The Bible is only supposed to lead people to God and from there the Spirit of Truth which is Jesus Christ himself will teach you what you need to know. Remember in the Bible where it talks about how Jesus always went against the Pharacees? The ones that looked more to a book of Laws than to the Spirit of God? I ask you who were the Pharacee's? They were the church folk. And the Bible says BEWARE OF THE LEAVEN OF THE PHARACEES. In other words y'all are doing the very same thing they did. If Jesus were here im sure he would tell you to stop such ignorance and LOVE one another like he commanded us to do. That is the Bible in a nutshell..... Love God and Love your brothers and sisters as you love yourself. People we can argue over which Bible to use and at the same time miss the WHOLE MESSAGE. SHAME ON US! Father open our eyes to see and our ears to hear what the Spirit says to us.

  • @sanalouis2620
    @sanalouis26205 ай бұрын

    KJV is my ongoing version I trust after been using NIV for years. We need to do our research further so we can find out the big difference in the text between every Versions. Been using NIV for years and find out later that many of the verses which is in KJV are totally erased in the NIV bible.

  • @rogelioancheta2430

    @rogelioancheta2430

    5 ай бұрын

    Oftentimes , the latest version is the most corrupt.. Business-minded individuals have crept in to manipulate translations to suit the taste of the public-you better study all versions to have a wider view of what is going on...

  • @TexasHoosier3118

    @TexasHoosier3118

    5 ай бұрын

    Why did the KJV add all those verses that are not supposed to be there?

  • @sanalouis2620

    @sanalouis2620

    5 ай бұрын

    @@TexasHoosier3118like which verses

  • @dennismingus
    @dennismingus3 ай бұрын

    The KJV 1769 is the correct Bible. Those who are trying to vilify the KJV are always referring to the older version.

  • @johnbale7962
    @johnbale79622 ай бұрын

    The king James is the last to include John 5:9 correctly. I reject any bible that gets that wrong. I'm open to earlier TR versions as well. John Burgon debunked modern objections to TR and is ignored by so as not to be considered by the the unwary. Search the scriptures, choose life.

  • @NONENOBLE
    @NONENOBLE27 күн бұрын

    Great work!!! This matters!!!

  • @rickybanks9024
    @rickybanks9024Ай бұрын

    Genesis 6.12 And God looked upon the earth and behold it was corrupt for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth. John who so ever eateth my flesh and drink my blood hath eternal life. The King James Version is corrupted before God. God is not a book. God is a eternal spirit that dwells within you

  • @Imsaved777
    @Imsaved7775 ай бұрын

    If you don’t like the King James Bible don’t read it. It’s not as if you don’t have other translations to read.

  • @NSWvet83
    @NSWvet835 ай бұрын

    You can use a British accent because it's been proven Americans feel it has authority, but this will still be VERY incorrect. Even older bibles use all these terms and scriptures this guy says the KJV "added". Bounce the KJV off the Geneva and 1500 versions you'll find it's very very close. Just some stuff changed because it didn't suit the king and catholics

  • @spencerbrown5063
    @spencerbrown50632 ай бұрын

    If you take the KJV and compare the verses in other bibles yourself, I believe you will agree with the KJV. I did just that and find the other bibles, especially that use the “Critical text” try to eliminate the “blood of Christ”, Christ’s deity, and many other things. It is not that hard to compare with the tools available.

  • @dariaschooler
    @dariaschooler3 ай бұрын

    Lots of bickering among Protestants about Bible versions. St. Jerome completed the Latin Vulgate translation from original Aramaic, Hebrew, and Greek texts in the late 4th century. Yet it is nearly 1200 years later all these other versions have been tinkered with for political reasons. St. Jerome is the definitive source closest to the original texts. Time to bring back Latin as a required language for all students to learn.

  • @khankorpofficial

    @khankorpofficial

    25 күн бұрын

    It's not even the best. The Papist Church has greatly edited the Vulgate many times since then

  • @RevanJJ
    @RevanJJАй бұрын

    Well done video!

  • @johnwainwright9313
    @johnwainwright93135 ай бұрын

    I am an absolute Trinitarian and am somewhat aggrieved to discover that 1 John 5:7,8 is an imposter!! However I am nonetheless assured of Yahweh’s Trinity on the basis of plentiful scriptures which do affirm this fact, without the need for 1 John 5:7,8. I have always had my doubts as to whether God would have used a man with such obvious sexual proclivities to exult His Word. Perhaps now, after 41 years, I can finally start reading a reliable Bible.

  • @retribution999
    @retribution9994 ай бұрын

    Evergy Christian should want to learn Greek and read the bible in its original language.

  • @DouglasNicholson-ff6ep
    @DouglasNicholson-ff6ep9 күн бұрын

    False teachers and their false Bibles preach Grace (AS) Christians commit sin. Real gospel preachers preach (empowering) Grace over, above, and against committing sin. Therefore, Real Preachers Preach from the Real KJV bible.

  • @Rod-Wheeler
    @Rod-Wheeler2 ай бұрын

    All Bible's are "corrupt" unless you can read Hebrew and Greek from the original of the Old Testaments or from the original Greek. Translations are always give and take. No language can be directly translated. Most translators do their best. I use several translations and a Hebrew/Greek interlinear Bible.

  • @richardhuff3051
    @richardhuff3051Ай бұрын

    Get some books from A.V. Publications and receive the correction I received 18 years ago.

  • @michaelfalsia6062
    @michaelfalsia60627 ай бұрын

    No doubt the King was corrupt, but the translators were fine scholars for their time and by and large godly men. The Authorized version is overall a very good translation. Like all translations it has its problems but is good enough to be held up as the word of God. Only the original can be said to be God-breathed and infallible. However insofar as translation goes it is a worthy translation for anyone who believes and loves the truth in Jesus. It is our duty to study and discover what we can in the original. To say that the truth is so obscured in the Authorized translation on any necessary point of doctrine that we ought to dispense with it is simply not true. Regarding the original languages the Authorized version is based on the same Greek text type common in the 16th and 17th century. If we find this line of reason to have any merit, then we ought to dismiss or question the theology of era before and after this translation came forth. The fact is that there are so many good solid Christian men over time used the AV shows the flaws of this denunciation and dismissive presentation. I can say as one who never builds any doctrine without examining the original, and for me Greek is more directly my concentrated area of knowledge I can say for certain the AV NT is a fine translation. When I have to amend or correct the AV I do so. In fact, there is no translation which cannot either be improved or enhanced in some fashion. For me all Greek manuscripts matter and must be consulted. No one manuscript text type should ever be swept aside completely and ignored. One may favor the Byzantine text over the Critical text but to simply discard either regardless of what camp you cast your lot with seems to me to be extreme and unreasonable. I use the AV and NASB, but I leave every man to his or her own conscience on the subject. History has demonstrated that the AV has been and will continue to be useful and a blessing to those who use this as their primary Bible. The KJV Only cult is another subject all together. If calling any translation, the word of God is somehow wrong or impious then let's dispense with all translations and learn to read the originals instead. Unfortunately, in order to convey the sacred truth of scriptures to anyone who does not know Hebrew or Greek would still be at the mercy of a translator. Hence, translations live on as God has ordained. Unto Him be glory in the church and in Christ Jesus throughout all ages. world without end. Amen. AV.

  • @karlbro7287

    @karlbro7287

    5 ай бұрын

    Very good? It's perfect, go to Truth is Christ channel here on KZread. Evidence for perfection there.

  • @michaelfalsia6062

    @michaelfalsia6062

    5 ай бұрын

    @karlbro7287 obviously you don't know Greek or Hebrew. No translation is perfect. Shows your utter ignorance on the subject.

  • @TexasHoosier3118

    @TexasHoosier3118

    5 ай бұрын

    Truth is Christ youtuber is of the KJV onlyism cult. Avoid false teachers. 1 John 5:7 is an obvious addition for political reasons. @@karlbro7287

  • @DouglasNicholson-ff6ep

    @DouglasNicholson-ff6ep

    2 ай бұрын

    How about 1 John 3:9-10 KJV Are YOU (PERSONALLY) ok with the subtle, DRASTIC changes.... Concerning how everyone can know who "the children of God" are and "the children of the devil"!? If YOU were a child of the devil, wouldn't YOU flood a nation with alternate "versions"...then begin corrupting everyone's faith in the good old KJV HOLY BIBLE? I WOULD! and THEY...have!

  • @danelleporter7330
    @danelleporter73305 ай бұрын

    I'm so sick of people out to put doubts in everybody's head, concerning God's word. The time is short, the devil is working overtime, so let's just share the simple plan of Salvation. I believe Jesus is coming back soon. Stop with this bs.

  • @biblebill6206
    @biblebill6206Ай бұрын

    KJV says Jacobs days were few and evil which is ridiculous should be few and difficult . Just an example how bad the bible is .

  • @SkyHoops-vv2bg
    @SkyHoops-vv2bg4 ай бұрын

    Lol it says 666 after the name. That def says a lot. So it's easy for people today to make accusations about something that took place 500 years ago however this is all based on pride and agendas. Know that no version of the Bible has taken this much depth into giving you the best interpretation of the Bible in all history before 1611 or since. Every page had to be agreed upon by over thirty other men that new every language they used to interpret from. Not just Hebrew and Greek. Know that the king had nothing to do with the interpretation aside from bringing the men and transcripts together. Also note the reason was because of the tyrant religion that still exists today but that back then had a strangle hold on the ignorance of the people as they did not have a Bible in thier own language that was well written. The KJV is the only version that puts words in italics so that the reader knows they put those words in to help you understand what's being said more easily. Also the KJV is the only current version not under copyright and in the KJV Bibles you will have letters from the interpreters as well as from the kind himself all stating that the reason they wrote the Bible in English, despite massive oppositions and threats, was so that we the people could know the truth. Don't fall for the lies. God is all powerful all knowing and all present so it is literally impossible for truth not to exist in the world.

  • @lonecar144
    @lonecar1444 ай бұрын

    Deut 4:2 (KJV) and Rev 22:18-19 (KJV) tell us there can be only one preserved Word of God. And yet version after version is spewed out to deceive. There is not a power that is not given by God. Through providence God raised up the most powerful nation there ever was or will be, the U.S.A., and in its infancy it was given the preserved word of God; “Robert Aitken, a Philadelphia printer, was the first to publish the first American edition of the K.J.V. New Testament in 1781 and the K.J.V. Old Testament in 1782, omitting the Apocrypha. On completion, he petitioned and received from the Congress of the Confederation, an official endorsement that Aitken added to the binding of his Bibles, to assure colonists that they were buying a non-royalist edition: “Resolved, that the United States in Congress assembled… recommend this edition of the Bible to the inhabitants of the United States and hereby authorize him to publish this recommendation.” As a result, the Aitken Bible (KJV) is often referred to as “The Bible (KJV) of the Revolution.” The nation was given the KJV, not the dead sea scrolls, not the book of Enoch, not Hebrew books etc. but only the KJV. If God wanted us to understand his word in Hebrew he would have raised this nation up speaking Hebrew. Back in the 1600’s God saw to it that the certain scriptures were translated into English “KJ Bible” and was put into print so that all could read for themselves the truth that in in the scriptures. God did this because he knew that he would bring about this powerful nation [U.S.A. and the English language] of ours to lead the world. The scriptures were written by apostles and prophets inspired by God through the Holy Ghost. The compilation and translation to English was also done by the direction of God through the Holy Ghost and he did not make any mistakes, i.e., the fourth horse being “pale” was no mistake, the horse is not green. In Greek mythology, the name Chloris (Khloris Χλωρίς, from khloros χλωρός, meaning “greenish-yellow,” “pale green,” “pale,” “pallid” or “fresh”) appears… Pallid 1. pale; faint or deficient in color; wan: a pallid countenance. People say that they believe that scripture was written by the direction of God and the Holy Ghost, which is true. But what you people don’t seem to realize is that the compilation and translation of the bible (KJV) was also done by the direction of God and the Holy Ghost. If the bible (KJV) was written and compiled by men of opinion and perspective and translated by incompetent translators then you might as well throw it in the trash. The prophets were told what to write and how to write it, 2 Peter 1:20-21 (KJV) The nation was given the symbol of the Eagle, 37 … Wheresoever the body is, thither will the eagles be gathered together. Luke 17:37 (KJV), the body being the Church, the body of Christ. The nation has the motto and preamble “in God we trust” and “one nation under God”. This greatest and most powerful nation the U.S.A., has been given the last and best chance to lead the world to heaven on earth or destruction. But like all other nations of power before it (symbolic Israels, Rev 11:8 (KJV)) the U.S. has chosen destruction and is now the great “liar” saying “in God we trust” and “one nation under God”, it is now the conglomerate of the dragon, beast, false prophet, and harlot, it is Satan loosed from the pit, 7 And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, 8 And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth Rev 20:7-8 (KJV). And yet no one seems to know of or speak of a very clear fulfillment of prophecy in our recent history. We (U.S.A.) are the ones who brought down fire from heaven in Aug. of 1945 and we are the ones that gave life to the image of the beast in May of 1948. Rev.13:13-15 (KJV). All glory to God. Amen

  • @jasperruddock5155
    @jasperruddock51552 ай бұрын

    Here's the difference between Daniel 11,43 43 But he shall have power over the treasures of gold and of silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt: and the Libyans and the Ethiopians shall be at his steps.KJV 43 But he shall have power over the treasures of gold and of silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt, and of the Libyans, and of the black Mores where he shall pass.Geneva Bible Can you see the difference?

  • @user-bd2uw1xu9s

    @user-bd2uw1xu9s

    24 күн бұрын

    "Mores" means "Moors" which, like "Black-a-Moor" was the term in those days for Sub-Saharan Africans

  • @bfrank88
    @bfrank885 ай бұрын

    Romans 3:4...KJB

  • @harrysollmer1644
    @harrysollmer16448 ай бұрын

    King James The 6th was a freemason who was in love with men freemason

  • @masterofthepuppets99

    @masterofthepuppets99

    5 ай бұрын

    Would you be able to share your source for that?

  • @josephhinojosa992
    @josephhinojosa992 Жыл бұрын

    KJV itself was revised in 1769. Even though there maybe 20 different Modern versions available today, 50 percent of Bible buyers STILL purchase the KJV. If it ain't broke..........

  • @Anony584

    @Anony584

    10 ай бұрын

    That means 50 percent prefer a modern translation that they can understand. No need to boost ego

  • @private-nobody6667

    @private-nobody6667

    8 ай бұрын

    One may want to check into Brandon Peterson, who has established through English numerics that the KJV is God's Words in English, and no other Bible does what KJV does with English numerics: www.youtube.com/@TruthisChrist

  • @sanalouis2620

    @sanalouis2620

    5 ай бұрын

    @@Anony584other translations are even more corrupted in its own translation adding and taking away from the word is unbelievable

  • @Ainitgreat

    @Ainitgreat

    5 ай бұрын

    @@sanalouis2620 Agreed. (Revelation 22:18-19) "For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: {19} And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."

  • @sanalouis2620

    @sanalouis2620

    5 ай бұрын

    @@AinitgreatAmen 🙏 thank you it a verse for everyone not to take lightly. God bless you x

  • @christopherjcarson
    @christopherjcarson8 ай бұрын

    Helpful talk very informative,and a good share! That said many of us find the language effective for memorising bible verses. That and the devotion and reverence of the Hampton court scholars,still makes it popular for readers today!

  • @jcsmith9412
    @jcsmith94126 ай бұрын

    Falsehood, slanted, lies, propaganda. Proverbs 13: 13 Whoso despiseth the word shall be destroyed.

  • @uglytree8869
    @uglytree88692 ай бұрын

    Another option laced nothing. The KJV 1611 or hit the road. Nothing to see here.

  • @PRP-MM
    @PRP-MM4 күн бұрын

    This entire thumbnail title is foolishness

  • @lostintranslation1957
    @lostintranslation19573 ай бұрын

    It really isn't

  • @lonecar144
    @lonecar1444 ай бұрын

    Re 14:20 From the 1599 Geneva bible. 14:20 And the winepress was trodden without the city, {15} and blood came out of the winepress, even unto the horse bridles, by the space of a thousand [and] six hundred furlongs. Note in the margin, (15) That is, overflowed very deep, and very far and wide: the speech is exaggeration to signify the greatness of the slaughter. These are those pleasant fruits truly, of the contempt of Christ, and desiring of Antichrist rather than him, which the miserable, mad and blind world reaps at this time. Re 14:20 From the 1611 King James bible. 20 And the winepress was trodden without the city, and blood came out of the winepress, even unto the horse bridles, by the space of a thousand and six hundred furlongs. Rev 14:20 (KJV) The true meaning of the verse, a horse is the symbol of a nation or race in stride (move out). Such as the four horses in the seven seals, Rev.6:1-8. The bridle is what rules or guides the horse and no natural horse uses more than one bridle, and the bridle is around the head of the horse. What the Spirit is saying in the word used in the bible is that the nation the horse represents is about to fall and blood will run from the lowest level (smallest courts) clear up and into the highest courts of the people, in other words all law enforcement, and military, are found guilty of misusing the laws. By how the nation uses or obeys the laws is how the nation is judged. King James was no saint, but God uses both good and bad to bring about his purpose. King James had an aversion to the notes in the margin of the Geneva bible as did God, meaning study bibles are a taboo. So God used King James’ aversion to bring about his (God’s) preserved word of truth in the English language, God did this because he knew that he would bring about this powerful nation [U.S.A. and the English language] of ours to lead the world. All glory to God. Amen

  • @josephde-zordi7324
    @josephde-zordi7324Ай бұрын

    Good presentation, pity its in a computer voice

  • @danen5
    @danen53 ай бұрын

    The kjv is broken but better than some and due to the strongs concordance of the kjv makes it very helpful with study. God is in control and he will get his truth to every person he chose to be first and eventually use them to bring all creation to the real truth. God will be all in all. Every knee will bow. Everyone will be of one true understanding aka God's true words. His will is all be saved and come to the truth. 1 timm 2-4 God does all his will and gets all his desire. We love God because he first loved us. We dont choose God he chooses us. Each in their own erra. God is the savior of all according to 1timm 4-10 its unfortunate he tells us this is worthy to teach yet i have found no church that does. Churches tell people he wants all to be saved but they have to choose in order for God to save them. That is absolutely not scripture. That is actually blasphemy of God's word. God is the savior of all!! All are not the savior. We are saved bye the faith of christ not our faith in Christ according to scripture yet no church agrees or teaches it. This is common truth in all translations yet most dont believe it because most don't honestly believe God. But rest knowing god is in control and he knows what he is doing and his will is done and his will is all be saved!

  • @darz3829
    @darz38294 ай бұрын

    It's easy - ALL bibles are minor historical sources. Ask your self this --Do you have any provable, fact-based evidence of anything spiritual in the bible? And by "evidence" I mean, NOT any hearsay, feelings, faith, beliefs, hopes, coincidences or bible stories written by man.

  • @MarkAlken-zt7ib
    @MarkAlken-zt7ib3 ай бұрын

    Integrity Syndicate? Yes definitely a “syndicate” with Jesuit overtones. But Integrity? Go and learn what the word means (may have to go back 400 years, remember the English language “has been updated”) and then apply and see if it reflects honestly in your mirror.

  • @blackviking6093
    @blackviking60932 жыл бұрын

    Jesus Christ is latin which was a red flag for me and the fact this is the most well respected version which is also a red flag because nothing in this world is truth! They will never promote what's real and sacred

  • @duncanrutherford2467

    @duncanrutherford2467

    Жыл бұрын

    Jesus spoke Aramaic.

  • @denisegaudette5048

    @denisegaudette5048

    Жыл бұрын

    ​@@duncanrutherford2467 Back in the day the letter J wasn't in the hebrew alphabet. When they started to translate the bibles is when they added the letter J .Yahova,YESHUA is the actual name .Jesus comes from the pagan religion

  • @TheBinaryWolf

    @TheBinaryWolf

    11 ай бұрын

    The term latin in koine Greek adds up to 666. The term tradition in Greek also adds up to 666. Such coincidences have meaning when papal Rome is recognized in Rev.17.

  • @TheBinaryWolf

    @TheBinaryWolf

    11 ай бұрын

    ​@@duncanrutherford2467Jesus spoke as much in common Greek as He did in Aramaic and Hebrew.

  • @Roxasamico

    @Roxasamico

    10 ай бұрын

    ​@@TheBinaryWolfcan you elaborate on the Greek for Latin adding up to 666?

  • @danen5
    @danen53 ай бұрын

    You are not saved bye trusting gods word. You are saved bye the death burial and resurrection of Christ though all who have faith in the truth are saved that is not what saved them. It was christ faith unto death and his faith alone that brought him to die and pay the full price for all!! According to scripture.

  • @LovelyBreakingWaves-no6ex
    @LovelyBreakingWaves-no6ex3 ай бұрын

    Jesus wasn't his name...yall all think you know something..but it obvious yall need to study more.

  • @JESUSisComing144
    @JESUSisComing1442 ай бұрын

    The book of Tobit is amazing. It’s funny how it was removed for “magic.” Do you not know GOD is the ultimate magician??? Where do you think “magic” comes from? This is a quote from Reddit. “In the deuterocanonical Book of Tobit, Tobias is instructed by the angel Raphael to use the burnt heart and liver of a fish to drive away the demon Asmodeus, and he also is told to use the gall of a fish to cure Tobit's (his father) blindness. Is this an example of ancient Jewish magic and are there other examples of this type of magic among ancient Jews?” Ummm…hello?? This is completely in GODs character! Lol If this amazing LEGITIMATE book was removed then you need to remove the WHOLE BIBLE. Lol God told Moses to perform magic to prove he is the Almighty. Are you daft? The whole Bible is full of MAGIC. Moses turned a snake into a staff. Do you remember??? Moses parted to Red Sea with a staff! Harry Potter on crack much? Elijah used his MAGICAL cloak of powers GOD gave him to summon a bear out of the woods to maul a gang of teenagers to death. Lol Elijah asked Elisha what he wanted. To name one thing he wanted before Elijah was rapture up (the rapture is magic in itself) and he wanted Elijah’s magic Cloak. This is insane. They didn’t remove any book for “magic.” That’s a damned to hell lie. If that was the case the whole Bible would be removed. Give me a break,

  • @ounkwon6442
    @ounkwon64425 күн бұрын

    Hail, KJV worshipers!

  • @jmbbk4737
    @jmbbk47379 ай бұрын

    At 19:44 the trinitarian theology. The Geneva bible not only forgot that Jesus is God in the flesh who died on the cross for sinners but they deny His deity. Isaiah 9:6-7. The Watch Tower Track Society also denies this Trinity truth using their New World Translatiom. At 24:12 it says the KJV in Acts 12:4 reads Easter. My KJV says, passover. We will see much more in due time of twisting of God's Word. Satan did it in the Garden of Eden. He did it in the old testament times and he his promoting it now in many watered-down churches. Someone from the Economic Forum said, AI is going to rewrite the Bible. KJV says, you can't get the to God except though Jesus. You can't have the Holy Spirit without this one truth for Jesus gives us the Holy Spirit. I did my homework on the New World Translation. Every Scripture in the KJV that points to this truth about who Jesus is...the NWT hides this and I have to admit, they did a great job at it. The deception lies within the subtle teaching of good works and not Jesus Christ and His finished work on the cross for salvation.

  • @mandandi

    @mandandi

    4 ай бұрын

    Mighty God is not Almighty God - at Isaiah 9:6-7. NWT at Acts 12:4 says the Passover. Some versions of the Bible says so too. NWT at John 14:6: "Jesus said to him: I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." - It looks like you missed this one verse in the NWT which does not hide the truth about Jesus. NWT at John 14:26: "But the helper, the holy spirit, which the Father will send in my name, that one will teach you all things and bring back to your minds all the things I told you." Share the other verses so we can independently confirm them. The NWT is available online, so everyone can check for themselves. So far it looks like your homework of examining the NWT is flawed.

  • @jmbbk4737

    @jmbbk4737

    4 ай бұрын

    @@mandandi NO! I have a sister who has been a JW along with her husband for at least 40 years and he is a elder of their congregation for a long time. I picked all the Scriptures out of a KJV to present to her the evidence of this Trinity. She refused to come back to me on this and on few occations, doesn't want to talk about it. I found out later that it was a waste of my time because I didn't realize they used a different Bible. I will not waste my time on your request. If you are JW then you would know this. That, the WatchTower Society teaches there people that the United Nations is the beast in the Book of Revelation. But, they were a NGO aligned to them for 10 years. I have a book from a women who went searching to call out the Guardian newspsaper for printing this false report she thought. She found out it was a true story. In her book she shows all the details. So, any JW that disputes this claim have no idea who their leaders are. If they hide this...they have taken the Deity away from Jesus. I will add, that when my sister and her husband had sat together a few years ago I asked about the verse, strong delusion to believe a lie...he said he wasn't aware of that verse. 2 Thessalonia 2:11.The Society also has the riight to change Scripture and their followers only read what the Society tells them. Try it. Give one something to read and see for yourself. I find it very interesting they named thier Bible, the New World translation when the world is moving into a new world order. Sure. They were involved with the UN who works toward this agenda 30. Have a pleasant day.

  • @mandandi

    @mandandi

    4 ай бұрын

    @@jmbbk4737 Thanks for the response. i asked you to clarify these statements you made in your earlier post: "I did my homework on the New World Translation. Every Scripture in the KJV that points to this truth about who Jesus is...the NWT hides this and I have to admit, they did a great job at it. The deception lies within the subtle teaching of good works and not Jesus Christ and His finished work on the cross for salvation." - using Scriptures from the NWT which you clearly stated has hidden. I used the scriptures from the NWT pointing out the fallacy of your statement. Now that you are exposed, you are going on a tangent about your family, who are not here to defend themselves. I use other versions of the Bible too, by the way. When someone criticizes a Bible version, I check it. Please defend your statements with proof of scriptures that were changed in the NWT and leave other people out of this discussion. This will help a lot of people I believe. Failure to do so means that you clearly have an agenda that others can see for themselves.

  • @jmbbk4737

    @jmbbk4737

    4 ай бұрын

    @@mandandi If you claim Jesus is the Lord God Almighty, Everlasting Father and Prince of Peace then we have common ground. The KJV is clear if it is read with the Holy Spirit that bears witness to the Trinity. The JW knows Deut 17:6. EvenThomas said to Jesus, My Lord and my God. Jesus and the his followers did not correct him. I John 5:7 Three bear witness. The Father, the Word (John 1:1)and the Holy Ghost. And the Word became flesh. (John:14) I brought others into this because they bore witness that Jesus was created and not God. I had no witnesses. If you are a JW and believe Jesus is the God of the Bible, then you need to preach to them that Jesus is God not me for I have known this most of my life. I am a witness to this even though I can't see Him. Like Jesus said, simple faith. God created us...He came down to die for sinners. I have one question for you if you are a JW. Would you like to see it?

  • @mandandi

    @mandandi

    4 ай бұрын

    @jmbbk4737 I did not claim Jesus is the Lord God Almighty. I simply quoted the verse, and it shows Mighty God, not Almighty God. Are you putting words in my mouth when the ink is not even dry yet? Everyone can see that you are twisting words here. So, this is how you get people to believe the trinity, by twisting things to your line of thinking, then claiming falsely that others have made changes that you can't prove. Quite the tactic.

  • @Andrewelite
    @Andrewelite5 ай бұрын

    All other versions are corrupt not the king James

  • @7thheaventruth
    @7thheaventruthАй бұрын

    KJV is the best one so far!!!!!

  • @billythekid7413
    @billythekid74134 ай бұрын

    Seems like the devil is behind this video

  • @eastmanresearch3143
    @eastmanresearch31434 ай бұрын

    Lets not forget some context, the Geneva Bible had a hand by John Calvin in France, Calvinists I have personally known not only reject the KJV but promote the geneva bible as much as they do their calvinism by always spinning every verse out of context to make their point, they love debate and actually revel in the fact they were chosen and God sends others to hell as there is no free will. Calvin himself and by his own words assisted in murder and had a hand in Michael Servedes burning. Look it up for yourself. Calvin is quite catholic and in my opinion 100% tyrant.

  • @danen5
    @danen53 ай бұрын

    There is no perfect translation of gods inspired words. Paul tells us to study and show thyself approved. We should test all translations before trusting their words to be truth. Remember God is true and every man is a liar. Man is flawed but God will get through to all those he chose before the disruption of the world to eventually reconcile all back to himself like his rightly divided word speaks.

  • @user-zj2gr5rd9f
    @user-zj2gr5rd9f4 ай бұрын

    Over 400 years of believing falsehood. READ THE PREFACE!!!

  • @silveriorebelo2920
    @silveriorebelo292010 ай бұрын

    funny to see the argument tha the KJV is based on Latin translation instead of being 'directly' from Greek - amazing ignorance and bigotry