Well connected, well explained and to the point.

Informative

Informative ☺️☺️

Very informative and understandable video❤

Plz do mention links and sources to prepare topics in detail for css

water is life...... if we save water we save future of both country, if not destroy land crops and become beggar...love for both country pak-ind ❤❤❤❤❤

Thanks sir ❤

When the two parties don't agree, it is better to renegotiate the treaty.

informative

Avi aur bahut kuch hoga 🔥

The sobbing never stops...

بہت اچھا تجزیہ مگر کیا مکمل ویڈیو اردو میں نہیں ہوسکتی؟؟؟

India is as rejecting everything, every order, every commission as Pakistan's ECP rejecting it's own law..😅

@fahadali2367

11 ай бұрын

😂

Dunia me jitny b wars hu rahy hai sari natural resources par based hai....

@Hope-xb5jv

Жыл бұрын

Bangladesh 1971 proof karo ??

@hadhikhan7730

11 ай бұрын

@@Hope-xb5jv ab proof ka kia karna hai.....dunia me exceptional cases b hai and its not necessary k sary same hu but thanks for the information......😊😊😊😊 r lagta hai ap bangladesh se he hu????

If India rejects the world bank and the permanent court of Arbitration, what Pakistan can do? China has already done it in South China sea case.

Technical issues kiaa he is me

Moral and ethics are fighting with chanakiya......

If India withdraw from this treaty what Pakistan can do?

@shubhamsharma73939

9 ай бұрын

Nothing 🙂

@user-zk5md7gm9k

4 ай бұрын

Cry

Indus river should be a part of India as our history is based on Indus valley civilization btw if India Blocks the Rivers of Pakistan than might be China block Brahmaputra river by their dams .. So it would be better that Pak and India should share water in percentage by means of our needs and population density !! Btw You must see video Abhi and Niyu to understand more on these Hope so the issue resolve and each one gets what is righteous.

@Vishwanath530

11 ай бұрын

Lol. Half knowledge us dangerous. Most of the water of brahmputra gain is from India and not China..

@vikramsingh34440

11 ай бұрын

Plz study first in barmputra water start from Tibet water water is 20% and 60 % water source come sikkam state china can't do anything .you can't save water you are wasting water in sea .

@srujithreddy335

6 ай бұрын

No one blocks water flow they use them by building dams and reservoier

@amitsaha9436

5 ай бұрын

If China blocks bramhaputra water India will block it's trade routes. Simple what Pakistan can block for India it needs to see. And if Pakistanis try to use nukes they will not be able to get 1 gallon of drinkable water. Let the Pakistanis try it 😂😂😂

@user-zk5md7gm9k

4 ай бұрын

Lol only 19 brahmptra source is in china rest all is in Bhutan and india

It will not effect INDIA atall

wise man said next world war on water

@dailyshortsbyankit

Жыл бұрын

A wise man said beggars are not choosers.😂

@rbaloch2789

Жыл бұрын

@@dailyshortsbyankit a wise man said: Mathematics mein a square+b square kare to result kya aata hai, lekin maan lijiye a+b × square(^2) × () square(^2) kare toh? a+b × () square(^2) kare toh? Toh result aata hai a square (^2) + 2ab+ b square(^2), ek extra 2ab milta hai ki nahi milta hai? Ye extra 2ab kaha se aaya? 😂😂😂 gurukul education

@samratroy7100

Жыл бұрын

@@rbaloch2789no it's madarsa education 🤣

@rbaloch2789

Жыл бұрын

@@samratroy7100 ok gobar modi madarsa main pada hai to fir to ho gadha hi honga

@Hope-xb5jv

Жыл бұрын

@@rbaloch2789 atleast he develop their country but what about yours beggar?

indus water treaty is of no use for india...i hope on one 5th august it will be nullified too

If the Indus water treaty is successful since last 63 years that means it is one sided in favour of Pakistan. Pakistan did not follow any rules of treaty during 1965, 1971 & 1999 aggression on India. Pakistan did not follow the Shimla agreement of 1971 that states that Kashmir will be resolved bi-laterally and blatantly send Jihadist into Kashmir and is directly responsible of Mumbai and many terrorist attack on other parts of India. There is no need for one sided Pakistan biased Indus water treaty, that gives 80 % of the waters to Pakistan in-spite of Internationally agreed rule of 40% water to upper riparian states.

Permament court of Arbitration has no policing power to enforce its judgement.

India has been violating all the rules and since partition, even Partition of India they did a lot of violence of Partition rules by giving Muslim majority states, provinces and districts to India where still Muslims are demanding Free Kashmir and and other are facing Hindutva terrorism in Assam Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. And then Indus Water treaty is being violated since many years and PAKISTAN isn't doing anything at all against the violation of this treaty. It's time to step up and take strong action against India about not only this violation but also for Kashmiri Muslims according to the UN resolutions, If United States can't do anything for this then China and Pakistan should mutually do this.

@shivansh9813

11 ай бұрын

cope more

@afrazamjad1644

11 ай бұрын

​@@shivansh9813drink more 🍾

@harshgupta_india

10 ай бұрын

gaad me dam nhi hm kisi se km nhi

Ok in Pakistan even the current affairs are half baked. Just Google and read the IWT article by article. Then you'll get a better view and understand the both side's concerns. Funniest part is when you said about war and that's of nuclear war😆 Let me give you some insights 1. According to IWT, India has rights to construct run-of-river hydroelectric projects. 2. This run-of-river hydel is allowed on Western rivers i.e. Indus, jhulum & chenab.That's exactly India is doing. 3. Then comes eastern rivers like Ravi, Beas & sutlej. India has sovereign right to use these rivers unrestricted. It can both develop hydel and store water. Then comes dispute resolution mechanism by IWT: IT'S A THREE STEP (DR) MECHANISM UNDER ARTICLE-9 OF IWT. # First, disputes can be resolved by PERMANENT INDUS COMMISSION or can also be taken up by at inter govt level. # Secondly in case of unresolved questions on water sharing such as technical differences, either side can approach the WORLD BANK TO APPOINT A NEUTRAL EXPERT(NE) to come to a decision. # Thirdly if either side isn't satisfied with NE's decision or in case of disputes in the interpretation and extent of the treaty, matters can be referred to a COURT OF ARBITRATION. Let's talk about recent developments: 1. In 2015, Pakistan asked that a NE should be appointed to examine its technical objections to KISHANGANGA & RATLE HEPs. 2. But following year Pakistan unilaterally retracted this request and proposed that a COURT OF ARBITRATION should adjudicate on its objections. 3. In 2016, Pakistan went to world Bank to set up a COURT of arbitration. 4. But India didn't respond to pakistan's request for a COA and moved a separate application asking for the appointment of a NE. 5. India had argued that pakistan's request for COA violated the graded mechanism of dispute resolution in the treaty. 6. In 2022, world Bank decided to resume the process of appointing a NE and a chairman for the COA. 7. So this recent judgement by COA carries no weight as India has never been a party to this COA process from beginning. As conclusion I can say 1. This era is different from 1960 when the treaty is signed. So IWT should incorporate mechanisms that allow flexibility to changes in the quantity of water available for allocation among the parties. Because climate change is a reality and it's altering the form, intensity and timing of precipitation and runoff. So Pakistan should keep in mind that this fixed allocation amount doesn't hold true after 63-64 years. 2. You've to agree that Pakistan has violated the graded mechanism. Whatever may the result but violating mechanism you're already violating the treaty. So stop foul play. 3. As a upper riparian country India has abided by the treaty as a responsible country. Although having a upper hand and having seen how Pakistan has violated other treaties like SHIMLA AGREEMENT, LAHORE DECLARATION, AGRA SUMMIT and KARACHI AGREEMENT, India hasn't violated and stand dedicate to this IWT. This is for India that the Indus Water Treaty Has been successful. So as a teacher at least try to understand the matter and stop behaving like a Pakistani politician. It amazes me how you talk about nuclear war. Really 😂 in 1999 when you attacked India and India Fu** you up still India followed IWT. Then also you've nuclear weapons why didn't you use them then. I don't want to say this but you Pakistanis always make yourself look like a clown. Ok just read don't spread hate.

@hsuyaarchives2526

Жыл бұрын

correct , amazingly they are so biased in education that they present half-truths and don't consider reading original sources.

@AHMEDALINAQVI

11 ай бұрын

Calling a nation of 225 million a clown and then saying not to spread hate reflects your individual sickening mindset. There are respectful ways of disagreement which i regret to say you are not aware of. Love and peace with disagreements ❤

@Louder111

11 ай бұрын

Bro. Don't worry .hum tou nuclear attack e kren gay 😂😂😂😂. Bas hamari mrzi 🤣

@SoumyaranjanparidaPIN2

11 ай бұрын

@@AHMEDALINAQVI I'm pleased that you get the message... The individual, who's teaching here and preparing your future beaurocrats is talking shit. What a dumb talk about nuclear war in this era. while in case of Pakistan, who couldn't even win a conventional war 😂.

@SoumyaranjanparidaPIN2

11 ай бұрын

@@Louder111 😂 are kitne aye kitne gye... 1965 bhi gya 1971 bhi gya or East pakisan bhi or 93000 ka izzat bhi 1999 bhi gya Are yaar pehle kisi PM ko apna term to pura karne do.... Har din to koi kisiko pit rha tumhare yehna Nuclear bomb 😂😂😂..oo bhi kuchh mne bechna padega bhai...agr IMF time pe bhik nhi deta or Saudi...or tumhare papa china bhik nhi dete Baki dekh lo.... China ko apna tan bech na he ki ya india mne suicide bombing karnaa he Bas yehi to ata he tumhe 😆

Brother, don't be so Jazwati by saying nuclear war.😅 Do you know the implication of nuclear war??

Pakistani beggar 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Rona dhona shuru.. Kuch kar payega toh karke dikha Heeramandistani. 😅 TTP zindabaad. Inshallah Lahore ko laundi bazar banayenge