Proudly Hausa from Nigeria 🇳🇬 God Bless Afro-Asiatic family ❤❤❤

@elemental7359

Жыл бұрын

Love for my Afro-Asiatic Family from Arabia ❤

Afroasiatic is the oldest living language family in the world

@lodewijkvandoornik3844

Жыл бұрын

And Nigero-Congo language family. There is a debate !

@lodewijkvandoornik3844

Жыл бұрын

And of course Khoisan languages.

@skp8748

Жыл бұрын

​@@lodewijkvandoornik3844 nope

@lodewijkvandoornik3844

Жыл бұрын

@@skp8748 nope what?

@khalidjabuuti2557

11 ай бұрын

@@lodewijkvandoornik3844 koisan meyp but Niger Kongo 5000bc like afro Asiatic brenc cushitic 5000bc

Mad afrocentrists in the comments. Afro asiatic language originates with the Natufian culture which also invented agriculture and beer. The neolithic revolution and afroasiatic language have the same origin. Afrocentrists will claim north Africa must have been black because it's in Africa, by that logic were the ancient canaanites asian? North Africans have been Caucasian since at latest the ice age between 20,000 and 10,000 bc.

@supermavro6072

2 жыл бұрын

The only Caucasians here are the Kazars who settled in paIestine 70 years ago.

@w.8329

2 жыл бұрын

Lol agree they don’t know their history that’s why and that we have Eurasian admixture for a reason

@HaulinOats315

2 жыл бұрын

@@supermavro6072 Caucasian doesn't mean European. Arabs and Indians are mostly Caucasian, and have been since at least the ice age. I'm just using them as examples so you know what Caucasian means. It's not a color but a shape of the body.

@supermavro6072

2 жыл бұрын

@@HaulinOats315 NO, Caucasian means >> Cockasian. I am from there.

@mariegreenlife

2 жыл бұрын

Whatever colour north africans are were or will be, the fact is they are Africans, their country is situated in Africa something that can't be changed. Next.

South cushitic speaking people were already present around northern tanzania by 5000 BC (Savanna Pastoral Neolithic), but in your map you havent really mapped it until 1 AD. Generally speaking, afro asiatic languages spread and diverged very much earlier than what you present here

@HamiticKushitic

2 жыл бұрын

I am not surprised that their are some people who speak kushitic that similar to the Oromo language due to the trade between the kushites and the Bantu who are originally form West Africa.

@w.8329

2 жыл бұрын

@@HamiticKushitic there was no trade with Bantu and we are cushites not kushites that’s Sudan history

@HamiticKushitic

2 жыл бұрын

@@w.8329 So you are saying that there were no trade between the Bantu who are people from the west of Africa and the Oromo who are afroasiatic from east Africa? If so where is you are evidence lol?

@w.8329

2 жыл бұрын

@@HamiticKushitic what contact do we have with Bantu they were not even allowed to enter south Ethiopia since we stopped their migration (this is documented so if u want I can send you). There were some Oromos enslaved In south Somalia with Bantu, but those were borana and they did no trade. We have long history with south Ethiopians and they are omotic not Bantu

@HamiticKushitic

2 жыл бұрын

@@w.8329 it is true that most of East Africa and north africa was populated by AfroAsiatic people such as my Oromo people and the people who are related to the Oromo. However, now most of East Africa is populated by the Bantu who emigrated from west Africa. Btw where you are evidance that somali enslaved the Oromo borana? Peace.

Wow!!! That's an improbably funny time-lapse. Also, the oriental sound defo makes it more convincing!

I started watching your videos and I just want u to know they're amazing! I'm glad they're improving so much lately, I recommend you to get a good editor like photoshop to make your maps :)

@hughcipher6229

4 жыл бұрын

This is an accurate video of the Urheimat of the Afro Asiatic language. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iYCom8uSms-5m9o.html What you just watched was academically horrible

@DeVolksrepubliek

Жыл бұрын

Hi hui-hui, what’s the name of that song you used in your video?

@DeVolksrepubliek

Жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/gohqlbWGgq6vnpM.html

The oldest language family of the world

Sahara was a green pasture land with rivers and lakes when the languages evolved.

@ranmasaotome2354

Жыл бұрын

True I think green Sahara allowed the afroasiatic languages to expand given how chadic languages are now located south of sahara.

Interesting and informative, but Maltese has been completely neglected. It appears neither on the map nor in the family tree.

@atbing2425

3 жыл бұрын

You are right, my bad

@oluwadamilola6233

Жыл бұрын

It's an outlier and very new

@jakedones2099

11 ай бұрын

siculo arabic

As a Tunisian (North African/Maghrebi) I'd like to add the fact that actually Maghrebi Arabic, is not purely and totally Arabic, it is actually an Arab-Berber dialectal language

@memezland1737

2 жыл бұрын

So it can be considered as Hamitic-Semitic language, this is actually the same thing from a genetic and cultural point of view for a majority of Maghrebis and in general most of North African people nowadays

@atbing2425

2 жыл бұрын

I'm not from the Maghreb, but do you really mean like, the language itself? The people being a mix of arabs and Berbers I agree, but the language not being fully Semitic is hard for me to see, maybe Maghrebi Arabic has a lot of Berber loanwords, but is it really half Berber? I'm not from the Maghreb so I don't really have a say, but I'm a bit surprised.

@memezland1737

2 жыл бұрын

@@atbing2425 I wouldn't say it's 50/50 but Maghrebi darija is at least composed by 25/30% of Berber

@Your__mama

2 жыл бұрын

Also I'm somali and the Arabic I speak I'm told is I sound yemeni it makes sense seeking how close the 2 countries are

@Skikdii

2 жыл бұрын

@@atbing2425 no dude he is lying I am Algerian myself and darija is 15% french 10% berber and 75% arabic

Damn. You actually got it right or about as close as a human could get it. Impressive.

@atbing2425

6 ай бұрын

Thank you

@phasematerialsresearch9319

2 ай бұрын

He actually got it completely wrong he’s probably an idiot stop stroking his ego

What are the dots over Canaries and Madera in 1500 AD? At that time guanche and spanish was spoken in the Canaries and portuguese in Madera.

@alltnorromOrustarNorrland

10 ай бұрын

Guanche was a Berber language

Very good video subject, but Afro-asiatic started in the horn. how ever it went back/forth again its home is in the horn. Thanks

@p00bix

2 жыл бұрын

@Thomas Nope ​ @Atbing 24 While a Levantine/Palestinian origin has not technically been ruled out, most scholars agree on an origin somewhere in Northeast Africa, NOT Asia. I made a writeup of this as my final paper for a history class a few years back, link here if you're interested. I'd encourage you to look at the bibliography (and other papers on the matter) if you're interested in some more of the details. docs.google.com/document/d/1r_nlRrTlmOzLy7jEsyTUFKrmjx1K_RZnbzGWZnfNDSk To give a TL;DR: The theory of an origin in the Levant hinges HEAVILY on two assumptions which aren't actually proven. The first assumption is that the speakers of Afro-Asiatic were sedentary farmers--which isn't actually required to explain most of the similarities in root words pertaining to agriculture. An alternative explanation is that Proto-Afro-Asiatic predates agriculture, but that terms related to agriculture spread from one branch of the family to the other branches through loaning later on. The second assumption agricultural societies first originated in the Middle East and completely replaced pre-Agricultural societies in just a few centuries. The problem with this assumption is that the actual time and location that agriculture was first development isn't known for certain, and it likely took *thousands* of years before purely hunter-gatherer societies completed the transition to purely agricultural societies. While it is almost certain that the 'purely' agricultural societies (the ones with cities and kings and irrigation canals and the like) originated in the Middle East, we have increasingly large amounts of evidence that the earlier proto-agricultural' practices that eventually evolved into true agriculture originated in East Africa, potentially as far south as Kenya but probably somewhere further north, thousands of years before the Sumerians or Ancient Egyptians. If Proto-Afro-Asiatic was spoken by the first farmers, and the first farmers lived in the Levant, then obviously Proto-Afro-Asiatic must have originated in the Levant. But we don't know if either of those two things are actually true, and more recent evidence strongly suggests that the language family instead originated in either the Ethiopian Highlands or the Nile River floodplains of Sudan, while only the Semitic Branch originated in the Levant.

@eho6380

2 жыл бұрын

It isn't settled yet, where the Afro-Asiatic Urheimat was.

@susantadeb7666

2 жыл бұрын

@@p00bix It is not necessarily Farming that evolved language, most likely domestication of animals that Definitely occurred in Africa most likely in Sahara when it was a fertile and green pasture. The language continued to diversify as it moved out of Africa.

@ramibakkar

2 жыл бұрын

Started in Syria not in the horn Because migration of white ppl with E haplogroup came from Syria (the Natufians) Before that north Africa was totally black ppl

@overtothisside504

Жыл бұрын

@@ramibakkar the nutufians weren't white they were brown

If Pro-AfroAsiatic originated in Levant, then ask yourself, why there's few diversity in Mid East ? And why Afro-asiatic didn't reached Turkey or Iran ? Or India? Afro-asiatic originated in North East Africa. Cushitic branches were the ancestors of Semitic branches. Semitic came from Africa 8,000 years ago. Berber and Chadic split in South west Egypt 6,000 years ago, Ancient Egyptian stayed in Africa

@atbing2425

3 жыл бұрын

Maybe they did venture out north, but they are now extinct, maybe the middle east did used to be more diverse than it is now (it's an old family)

@xanshen9011

3 жыл бұрын

Probably because indo european specifically the anatolian and indo iranian branches replaced the older languages (afro asiatic?) then later turkic languages came and replaced the previously mentioned.

@danieltabin6470

3 жыл бұрын

They were replaced by Semitic and other languages. Afroasiatic is extremely old. Plenty of time for language replacement. Look at the way Arabic has replaced almost all old Semitic languages. Moreover all other evidence (root words, archeology, genetics, etc) points towards a levantine origin

@teddyissak2720

3 жыл бұрын

@@atbing2425 There is no room for speculation here, you have to provide evidence for this kind of wild claim. Other wise you are loading hypothesis over another hypothesis.

@BeitilNabawiya

2 жыл бұрын

@@LostTumbs You sound dumb and have no knowledge of the language phylum. YOU PROBABLY DON'T BELIEVE IN SCIENCE.

Amazing video! You deserve way more subs! Subbed and liked!

Super!!!!!!!✌️✌️✌️👍👍👍👍👍👌👌👌👌👌

Right Self was here 📍

Tf is "pre-Arabic"? You mean Old Arabic or Proto-Arabic?

The Levant origin is well established when taking into account genomic data of populations in the Middle-East, Northern Africa, as well as the Horn of Africa and Sahel region.

@antongalchier144

4 ай бұрын

My ged match was 49%levan 51% horn africa

@gamalnassertv

4 ай бұрын

Where are you from?@@antongalchier144

@phasematerialsresearch9319

2 ай бұрын

Saying “genomic data” doesn’t make you smart, dumb guy. $100k says you have no idea what “genomic data” even means let alone how to interpret it properly.

@joalvarado8506

Ай бұрын

E-M215 and its E-M35 subclade are associated with Afro-Asiatic speakers and both have an African origin. Only the Semitic branch is outside Africa thereby implying an African origin as well. Even Egyptian oral history tells us that they came from Punt, which is in the Horn of Africa (baboon DNA confirmed this).

@gamalnassertv

Ай бұрын

I'm talking about autosomal DNA, and the E-M35 goes back 40,000 years, subclade matters, all the ones in todays admixed Horn of Africans are downstream mutations@@joalvarado8506

Afroasiatic languages expanded from africa to the east; as simple as that

@mikailm6934

3 жыл бұрын

Its not sur

@souhilaoughlis5832

3 жыл бұрын

Yes that's what Diakonnof said on his book ''Afrasian langue '' page 23 24 and 26

@acea1184

2 жыл бұрын

@@souhilaoughlis5832If that was the case Eurasians would carry African maternal lineage which they don’t

@napabilirim

2 жыл бұрын

@@acea1184 All of the modern Semitic-speaking countries except the Fertile Crescent have a significant amount of African DNA.

@_Painted

2 жыл бұрын

@@napabilirim I am pretty sure that the available archaeogenetic results so far indicate the modern African admixture in Arabs to be at least primarily from the Islamic era slave trade. South Arabia (especially Yemen) might be an exception because they did have ties to the horn of Africa.

that rise of nations music doe

Terrific, thanks for the sharing the research

@mursalwarsame5839

4 жыл бұрын

hi my semetic cousin :)

@abdulahimohamed2314

4 жыл бұрын

@@mursalwarsame5839 Afar Ta waxey isku hestan Yahuudi

@AA-el4pq

2 жыл бұрын

I know fake research like this does make you guys feel better.

Most likely place of Origin for Afro Asiatic is North East Africa/Horn of Africa not Levant.

@atbing2425

4 жыл бұрын

Yes I know, interesting, though recently this theory is gaining popularity

@DISD1000

3 жыл бұрын

Hi brother,The most appropriate place to explain the migration of Afro-Asiatic peoples is the Levant

@abdulahimohamed2314

3 жыл бұрын

@@DISD1000 Not Search in Google

@axumitedessalegn3549

2 жыл бұрын

Highly unlikely. It goes both ways but mostly back to africa migration There would be borrowed words that are Africans isolate in the levant that still exists but they don't. Genetic test of the oldest Natufian shows only 6 percent of their gene coming from proto Omotic populations and looking at Afro-asiatic speakers shows their DNA having a much higher Asiatic penetration into their geography.

@oluwadamilola6233

Жыл бұрын

No

Subscribing!

I think the 500 years gaps are too wide

I'm a bit confused because it seems the video explains that the Cushitic languages trace to origins in present day Palestine.

@atbing2425

2 жыл бұрын

According to some, yes. According to others, the horn of Africa. Various other Afro-Asiatic urheimats have been suggested.

Nice, I don't know too much about Afro-Asiatic languages

@hughcipher6229

4 жыл бұрын

This is an accurate video of the Urheimat of the Afro Asiatic language. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iYCom8uSms-5m9o.html What you just watched was academically horrible

Can you at least reference a source?

This is fascinating and this means orginal Cushites were Middle Easterner and orginated in Arab peninsula before migrating into Horn of Africa. I have watched lot DNA ancestry videos from Ethiopians and Eritrea and lot of them have 20-25% Eurasian DNA.

@mikligardur9104

3 жыл бұрын

@@Brildanne Well maybe not so high % among cushitic speaking people in Ethopia but among semitic speaking people in north Ethopia and in Eritrea.

@lif3andthings763

3 жыл бұрын

Those “Eurasian” did not look like your average arab today they were much darker and could not digest milk

@user-io5mz5ck6e

3 жыл бұрын

@@lif3andthings763 Proof?

@gugi4477

3 жыл бұрын

@@mikligardur9104 Northern africa is more likely

@user-ko2lp6zb6o

3 жыл бұрын

@@lif3andthings763 the fact that horn African carry the gene for lighter/white skin suggests they were not dark skinned

the originated from northeast Africa not the middle east.

@elliottbrown1329

3 жыл бұрын

most likely from what is now Ethiopia/Somalia.

@elliottbrown1329

3 жыл бұрын

@OtherWorlds AllWorlds Feel free to submit genetic evidence that shows the origin of Afroasiatic languages not being in Africa. You won't.

Semitism is separate from African and Asian languages and from injustice to include them with those languages.

Afroasiatic spread to Africa much much much earlier than that,around 7000 BC

Didn't modern linguists explain how Egyptian began is western Ethiopia

This doesn't match the evidence as I understand it. No.

@atbing2425

2 жыл бұрын

What did it originate in the horn of Africa, I said possibly yes or maybe the levant

@noahtylerpritchett2682

Жыл бұрын

The presence of Natufian dna exisr

Arabs and Hebrews come from Abraham Cushite Come from Nouh So who is Old? Adam was in Horn of Africa

@atbing2425

3 жыл бұрын

This scientific theory isn't compatible with abraham, noah, adam etc.

@arta.xshaca

3 жыл бұрын

Still they existed.

@BeitilNabawiya

3 жыл бұрын

Bullshit , stop bringing religion in science class. You are going to get your feelings hurt.

@abdulahimohamed2314

3 жыл бұрын

@@BeitilNabawiya this vedio is about Religion Made by Religion

@abdulahimohamed2314

3 жыл бұрын

@@asma89890 True

❤❤❤

The origin of Afroasiatic language is not palestine! Proposed locations include the Horn of Africa, North Africa, the Eastern Sahara and the Levant.

@atbing2425

3 жыл бұрын

The levant, exactly

@comunadabahia

3 жыл бұрын

@@atbing2425 But it is not the only one. Okay, but "the levant" doesn't exactly mean Palestine, the definition is inaccurate and covers several places in the Middle East. In any case, it gives a false impression that Palestine is the only probable origin of this family.

@danieliassenfgh618

2 жыл бұрын

​@@comunadabahia Do you even know where the Levant is? Palestine is in the Levant, so is the area depicted in the video.

@comunadabahia

2 жыл бұрын

@@danieliassenfgh618 Comrade, if you look at the video, it gives the impression that the Afro-Asian languages ​​emerged in the levant, I know that Paletina is considered part of the region historically called the Levant. However, this region is one of the possible 'urheimat' of speakers of the hypothetical proto-Afro-Asiatic Liguan, and recent research also indicates the regions of Ethiopia, and the western coast of the Red Sea. but the video suggests that the levant is the only option. That's what I meant.

@eho6380

2 жыл бұрын

@@comunadabahia Horn-Africans have 30-50% Middle-Eastern ancestry, it would make much more sense that this admixture came to the Horn of Africa together with the Afro-Asiatic languages. It would not have made any sense if the Afro-Asiatic languages originated in the Horn of Africa and spread to the Middle-East without any kind of gene-flow/migrations.

I love all Afro-Asiatic peoples. Every civilization here I admire. Oh and I mean all. I don't care if butthurt nationalists who hate other afro-asiatics got angry at me for liking their enemies too. But yea I love every tribe and culture and civilization mentioned here.

@dann_mrtins

3 жыл бұрын

Lol, I definitely don't love them, but still I like basic anthropology, and these kind of videos are pretty cool.

@Evansdrad8515

3 жыл бұрын

@@dann_mrtins that's your opinion but I mean I literally have friends and a girlfriend from Afro-Asiatic lands. exes and current friends and all of that.

@dann_mrtins

3 жыл бұрын

Oh, now I get it. Peace

@rediettadesse2828

2 жыл бұрын

Yes afro Asiatic is like every oldest civilization of the world Proud to be one of them

@guleet75

2 жыл бұрын

Hi again ! Stalker 😂

10000 BC? Damn , it is pretty old. And I thought my Uralic family is old with its 5000-3000 BC

@samishaniyy

2 жыл бұрын

Some theories say between 16,000 and 10,000 BC , I think it might be older than 10,000 BC

@user-ii6jn1ho2k

2 жыл бұрын

afroasiatic is actually not a family, it's a macrofamily

@moanjelo9453

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-ii6jn1ho2k What do you mean macro family?

@user-ii6jn1ho2k

2 жыл бұрын

@@moanjelo9453 macrofamily is a huge family of languages that includes smaller language families. There are many hypothetical macrofamilies, yet the number of actually proven ones is very small

@bakeee1453

2 жыл бұрын

It‘s probably the oldest language family

African afro Asian :oh sht We R go again

Where are geez and Akkadian in that family tree language?😂😂😂

This video has no logic

@atbing2425

3 жыл бұрын

Why lol

@MrZiZoo1

3 жыл бұрын

@@atbing2425 Look how diverse the afro-asiatic languages in africa, yet according to this video they appeared in Asia, then move to africa and disappeared in Asia!! Also for kushitic languages, both north and south kushitic languages appeared in arabia but they went through Ethiopia, and south kushitic went to south of Ethiopia and waited for north one to come loool, and they moved to the north together so that the north kushitic will always be in the north!

@atbing2425

3 жыл бұрын

The levant hypothesis is valid, it explains the spread of farming and vocabulary from the middle east, plus the most diverse area around 2000 years ago is around egypt, it doesn't make sense for them to venture out north but not south

@elliottbrown1329

3 жыл бұрын

@@atbing2425 The Afroasiatic language groups are associated with the spread of pastoralism by E haplogroup carriers from the Ethiopian highlands. In 4000 BC. the first hieroglyphs were found on Gerzean pottery. You don't even have that region identitime frame

@MrZiZoo1

3 жыл бұрын

@@atbing2425 All people know that the sahara desert was green in ancient time, the climate change made things hard for people living there so they migrated to the north and spread their languages with them! At least you should've mentioned both hypothesis

As soon as I heard the music for this vid i was like "here comes a fallacy" then the vids maker writes in small words infering theres a debate about Afro-Asiatic starting in East Africa at it horn. Then the video goes on to place Afro Asiatic origins in the levant at 8k years ago😂😂 the 1st Afro Asiatic speakers in the levant were Akkadians & Eblaites who spoke it in 3000 bce. People were speaking Afro Asiatic in the Nile valley 8k years ago. Afro Asiatic is 15k years old & began at in the African Horn. Where'd you get this mixed up information. You need to correct this otherwise youre just willfully spreading inaccuracies

@bakeee1453

3 жыл бұрын

Afroasiatic is Asian origin(Levante, Saudi Arabia)

@hughcipher6229

3 жыл бұрын

@@bakeee1453 "The earliest written evidence of an Afroasiatic language is an Ancient Egyptian inscription dated c. 3400 BC (5,400 years ago).[6] Symbols on Gerzean pottery resembling Egyptian hieroglyphs date back to c. 4000 BC, suggesting a still earlier possible date. This gives us a minimum date for the age of Afroasiatic. However, Ancient Egyptian is highly divergent from proto-Afroasiatic (Trombetti 1905: 1-2), and considerable time must have elapsed in between them. Estimates of the date at which the proto-Afroasiatic language was spoken vary widely. They fall within a range between approximately 7,500 BC (9,500 years ago) and approximately 16,000 BC (18,000 years ago). According to Igor M. Diakonoff (1988: 33n), proto-Afroasiatic was spoken c. 10,000 BC. According to Christopher Ehret (2002: 35-36), proto-Afroasiatic was spoken c. 11,000 BC at the latest, and possibly as early as c. 16,000 BC. These dates are older than dates associated with most other protolanguages. Culturally this falls within the period of the Halfan culture which may have been proto-Afroasiatic." "1. Haplogroup E1b1b is thought to have originated in the Horn of Africa. In general, Afroasiatic speaking populations have relatively high frequencies of this haplogroup, with the notable exception of Chadic speaking populations. Christopher Ehret and Shomarka Keita have suggested that the geography of the E1b1b lineage coincides with the distribution of Afroasiatic languages." en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afroasiatic_Urheimat

@Koraxus

3 жыл бұрын

@@hughcipher6229 Discovery of alphabets means nothing in terms of proto-languages that were spoken when writing did not exist. Using hieroglyphs or known historical civilizations to prove genetic origins of languages is also a big fallacy.

@hughcipher6229

3 жыл бұрын

@@Koraxus The discovery of a phonetic script is not the only evidence I offer. Thats a strawman attack your using. Im alluding to proto languages that existed at least 10k years prior to any alphabet & you reply as if the evidence of the earliest phonetic script is all I offer. Also simply saying something is a fallacy with no explanation as to how or its a fallacy is just argumentative & disingenuous

@Koraxus

3 жыл бұрын

@@hughcipher6229 One of the videos you show still considers it valid that (from Ancient Semite or something like that) the urheimat could have very well been in the Levant, and admits that he changed the maps of the last theory to match the other African Centered maps. What is the consensus is that the homeland of this language family was around the red sea, but not which side. It could have been even both. Absolutely all the migration models show it's very easy to cross to either side. All the migration and expansion models shown can still work either way, even if you put the origin in Djibouti or Yemen. You could place them as further North as the Nile Delta and most of the models would still work with very minor tweaks. I'm not discrediting you entirely, those videos and info you shown are very helpful in exploring the split ups and timelines, but it's still nothing conclusive.

Sahara and Arabia start to become green and abudance in food resource in 9000 b.c. to 5000 b.c. I think afroasiatic language start to spread between that time with the people from the Levant to Africa. The farthest group that go visit Mega Chad Lake are now Chadic group. African afroasiatics speaking people are majority difference in facial structure unlike real black african from the west part or the south part especially their nose that show caucasian-nose evidence

Comment section are arguing where it is started/origin. Who cares ? It was a long time ago. One thing is for sure the present day people who speak this language family still have traits of their common origin both genetically and linguistically. We should celebrate for that. Peace!

@AA-el4pq

2 жыл бұрын

This Macro family did start in Africa and expand there as well. There are some exception where some Nomads from Asia invaded and settle in East Africa. But this is only limited to the Somalia and Northern Sudan area. The rest are native Africans.

Do we know who lived in western north africa before "B*rbers"? (Its a slur btw)

@mikailm6934

Жыл бұрын

Niger-Congo in the southern part(Mauritania maybe up to Western Sahara) but we don't know for the remaining parts

Haha...don't be silly, you're one of those with "the lost tribe theory"

Proto afro asiatic originated in Northeast aftica its the most accepted theory and also Ethiopic is not the descendant of oldsouth arabian the ancestors of ethiosemitic speakers arrived in 2000bc 1000 years before south arabian (sabaeans) arrived

@atbing2425

2 жыл бұрын

I said that you could be right, but it could be in the Levant who knows, how did Ethiopians arrive so early, they are south semitic, not descendants of old south Arabian like sabean, but close relatives

@enrico7474

2 жыл бұрын

@@atbing2425 u do know that southsemitic speakers are older than north semitic speakers right? Ethiopians probably came from ana (ancient north arabians)i have seen some interesting similarities with akkadians too

@NubiansNapata

2 жыл бұрын

Most likely in horn of Africa.

@muktarabdu9621

2 жыл бұрын

@@atbing2425 Wait what amhra people are linguistically semtics. But most of them are genetically diffrent from yemni people. Don't get me wrong i acknowlegde the fact that they are mixed. But i don't agree with the part that they are all orignally from yemen some minority are but the majorty aren't.

@BF-bb5us

2 жыл бұрын

@አደዳይ ኣባይ ፩፫ it's most likely the horners that influenced not the other way round.

Hello!!! It's not call a Asiaticafrican language.... It's a Africanasiatic language.... Meaning it didn't start in Asia then moved to Africa... It started in Africa then moved to Asia! SMH... Man it's not even a river when u claiming the language started at... Language is a by product to civilization... Civilization is a by product of access to fresh water.... Where's the river man?? W/0 the river there's no civilization, without civilization there's no language.

@atbing2425

4 жыл бұрын

Just because it's called afro Asiatic doesn't mean it started in Africa, Second, civilization doesn't have to start at a river. This theory states that Afro Asiatic originated in the fertile crescent which is fertile. Though I don't mean to disrespect any other widespread theories

@mikehart5593

4 жыл бұрын

So what evidence do you have to support this claim... Google oldest evidence of Afroasiatic language & U will see that it's founded in Egypt around 3400 BC. 2nd if U didn't need a river or lake to start an ancient civilization then where do these people get enough fresh water to drink, bath, and support their crops year round? 3rd if the Afroasiatic language started outside of Africa who were the foreigners that brought the language. Who conquer & taught all these black people a new language from Ethiopia to Morocco?? What empire was this? 🤔

@unfetteredparacosmian

4 жыл бұрын

Language doesn't require civilization.

@mikehart5593

4 жыл бұрын

@@unfetteredparacosmian ok Class here we go. The def of civilization is Social/Cultural development plus organization. U can't achieve this w/o a language. And w/o people organizing themselves socially & culturally then there's really no need to have a official language. Civilization & Language go Hand n Hand. U can't have one w/o the other. Please name me 1.... Just 1 language in History where the people who spoke it didnt organize to develop a culture and a social society??? I'll wait.....

@Threezi04

3 жыл бұрын

@@mikehart5593 Culture is different from civilisation. All peoples, even the uncontacted and uncivilised tribes of the Amazon, have languages.

The arabian moment was powerful.

👍😍👍👍👍😏😏😏

ⵣ 🇩🇿 ⵣ

Afro Asiatic emerged from the horn of Africa not the other way around

@il967

Жыл бұрын

Then why do Cushites have natufian admixture?

@ThePanEthiopian

Жыл бұрын

@@il967 mmh good point

@moorishsociety7339

Жыл бұрын

@@il967 Are you out of your mind ? "Natufian" is a culture, it's a form of practice. Lol

@il967

Жыл бұрын

@@moorishsociety7339 practices are how cultures are identified, idiot

@tewekdenahom485

Жыл бұрын

@@il967 you should be asking why natufians have ethiopian features

👏

Did this language family really originate in the Levant rather than in East Africa?

@atbing2425

4 жыл бұрын

Both good theories, still unkown.

@atbing2425

4 жыл бұрын

In my opinion at least both are solid theories, still unkown which is more accurate. I chose the Levant since we can trace words of proto afroasiatic that would make sense if it started there, also agriculture started around that area and maybe they spread it around. According to genetics there was a back migration of at least r1 back to Africa (where there are Chadic speakers). And if you look at the Levant around 1ad in the video it's the most diverse and central area of the language family at the time.

@hughcipher6229

4 жыл бұрын

No its long been established Afro Asiatic began in East Africa This is an accurate video of the Urheimat of the Afro Asiatic language. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iYCom8uSms-5m9o.html What you just watched was academically horrible

@atbing2425

4 жыл бұрын

@@hughcipher6229 the same guy literally posted a second version of the video you brought up stating a newer theory of afroasiatic originating in the levant, possibly associated with the natufian culture.

@hughcipher6229

4 жыл бұрын

@@atbing2425 it is true Afro Asiatic was theorized to have originated in the Levant but it is now known it began around 15k to 17k bce & originated in the East African Horn. The Natufian culture dates to 12k bce so they could not have created AA

Nice music lol

Speakers of the proto-afrasian language were Caucasian race

@macrobianworier8660

3 жыл бұрын

No they weren't

@love_x_love6619

3 жыл бұрын

@@macrobianworier8660 Yes, Semites are Caucasiods.

@enrico7474

3 жыл бұрын

Thats doesn't mean white tho

@supermavro6072

2 жыл бұрын

Kazarian spotted

@SlimReaper10101

6 ай бұрын

Here we go

Where is Afaan Oromoo

@somaliforeheadwarrior9721

Жыл бұрын

South Cushitic

@bisharGellowMahad

11 ай бұрын

Cushitic

This video is bullshit. I am Oromo and my language did not originate in the middle East. Unless you have evidence such as genetic and linguistic relation? The Oromo language which afroasiatic is orginted In Oromiyya which is in east Africa. Peace.

@teddyissak2720

3 жыл бұрын

@Bix Dellama There is no such thing as Semites or Cushites. The people of Kush were in East/Central Sudan. They have no relation with Oromos. Ethiopia had virtually 0 relation ship with Yemen. Only Somalis are related to Yemen not the other Ethiopians.

@mikailm6934

3 жыл бұрын

Nobody is saying oromo originated in the middle East but the ancestral language of oromo and other cushites was from Sudan or the middle East (the first more likely that the second) then they expanded in the horn where the ancestral languages evolved into oromo , somali and so forth

@teddyissak2720

3 жыл бұрын

@@mikailm6934 No they didn't !!! Are you insane ??? First off all these language aren't even related to begin with. How the heII did you come up with this baseless logic to deconstructed such a multitude and complex set of languages. This type of simplistic and narrow thinking is what's making things more complicated and disorders than they have ever been. You don't even have any slight evidence to back up this claim other than, the usual baseless " hypothesis " which some like to throw off

@ogolow570

2 жыл бұрын

@@teddyissak2720 Afaan Oromo and Af Soomaali are defiantly related 😂

@rediettadesse2828

2 жыл бұрын

@@teddyissak2720 Ethiopian hv history with Yemen 1000% 😳 Quran and other historical books proves that along we speak a SEMITIC LANGUAGE

Phonecian Sumerian Bayblonian and Akadian Languages

@matheusgarcino1767

4 жыл бұрын

Sumerians were not afroasiatic they were a isolated language. Or related with the dravidic languages of india a new theory i have to say

@atbing2425

4 жыл бұрын

Phoenicians is a subset of northwest semitic, Babylonian and Akkadian are a subset of eastern semitic. For more detail of the semitic languages I have a video on that too

@ananaskopf7184

2 жыл бұрын

Sumerian is not Afro-asiatic it’s actually more related to the Dravidian languages in southern India.

Lmao what a Lot crap Arabic originated in Yemen and not Saudi Arabia. Cushite originated in Northeast Africa what is now called Sudan (Nubia/Kush). Omotic originated in Southeast Ethiopia!! Please Don't spread lies and check your sources!!!

@beaniies

2 жыл бұрын

Actually Cushite originated in Somalia other than that you’re right about the rest

@moreno8383

2 жыл бұрын

@@beaniies cushite comes from the name Kush , why are people so misinformed i get tired of this man 🤦‍♂️

@beaniies

2 жыл бұрын

@@moreno8383 kush is different from Cushite. Kush is a Sudanese ancient kingdom in Nubia;Cushites are a group of people who speak the Cushitic language which is the oldest language group of the afroasiatic language family. Somalis are Puntites and are related to ancient Egyptians. The ancient Egyptians considered the land of punt as their ancestral homeland we have nothing to do with Nubian kingdom it’s is a Sudanese kingdom.

@moreno8383

2 жыл бұрын

@@beaniies 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣whaaat. ok i give up. no time for nonesense sorry bro still love my somalis brothers but pls open your mind 👌

@beaniies

2 жыл бұрын

@@moreno8383 so you have nothing to refute? Show me proof that Cushite and kush are the same.

Omotic are not an ethnic mix outside of Africa 🤣💔 This is totally nonsensical 1:33 Thus, the Afro-Asiatic languages ​​are of African origin, there is only one branch outside Africa, and they or Semitic languages...

@enrico7474

3 жыл бұрын

@yes maby bruh it started in the omo valley or the levant there is proof

@enrico7474

3 жыл бұрын

@yes maby ure just being nationalist or something afro-asiatic started either from the levant or the omovalley this is according to scholars not some tribalists like u

@zos_

2 жыл бұрын

@@enrico7474 Afro-Asiatic languages ​​are of African origin and are one of the languages ​​of the African continent.

@enrico7474

2 жыл бұрын

@@zos_ semitic is afroasiatic but its native to asia not africa

@zos_

2 жыл бұрын

@@enrico7474 It is not true, all Afro-Asiatic languages ​​are in Africa, appeared in Africa, and Africans are much older than the population of Asia or elsewhere. All the Afro-Asian peoples in Africa, Cochin, Chadic, Berbers, Egyptians, Libyans, Mutias, etc... you want to make all these peoples and nations out of Africa just for there is one language in Asia. lol 😄

Well this is the Levant hypothesis as the same way as Indo-Europeans have Anatolian hypothesis.As you know Levant and Anatolia are prety much the same area.So my question is is it possible that Indo-Europeans and Afro-Asiatics come from the same source!Is it possible that this source to be the Fertile Cresent and the home of the Caucasoid race?

@beliqzub6900

3 жыл бұрын

@Arabic dude OK but are there any genetic studies as we can see that both Afro Asiatics and Indo Europeans are both Caucasoids racially?

@beliqzub6900

3 жыл бұрын

@Arabic dude Caucasoid race is not limited to Europe. Caucasoid race is Europe West Asia Central Asia South Asia North Asia North Africa and the Horn of Africa.

@beliqzub6900

3 жыл бұрын

@Arabic dude Language and race are two different things.Like a Black man speaking english does not make him anglosaxon or Egyptian speaking Arabic does not make him Arab.

@BeitilNabawiya

3 жыл бұрын

No such thing as Caucasus race

That's called.A Semitic Hamitic language

Every thing starts their (Holy Land) PALESTINE ♥️♥️♥️♥️🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸♥️♥️♥️♥️

@michal31131

Жыл бұрын

Lol

U should have put cushitic and omotic together as pre omoto cushitic

@atbing2425

2 жыл бұрын

South afriasiasitic (pre omotic cushitic)

@w.8329

2 жыл бұрын

That dosent make sense omotic is separate of cushite it’s not under afroasiatic

I read a study recently that said Arabs are early Eurasian people before they migrates to places like Europe. Does this mean that when Arabs moved to Egypt (seen in this vid) that Egyptians are technically European since they are Arabs?

@atbing2425

3 жыл бұрын

According to that logic every human is ethiopian, cause that's where we originated, (but that's obviously wrong) we just originated in modern day ethiopia. Yes arabs (and afroasiatic people in general) are caucasian, the Caucasians that stayed in the middle east and didn't migrate to Europe. That doesn't make them Europeans

@shereehi5539

3 жыл бұрын

@@atbing2425 lies

@bag6483

2 жыл бұрын

The First Semitic people were from Haplogroup E-M35 and which born in North Africa but now most Arabs of peninsula Are J1 haplogroup I Caucasian haplogroup came to levant around 3000 BC

@mariegreenlife

2 жыл бұрын

Egyptians speak Arabic but they are not Arab ethnically same goes for Morrocons etc.

@newyorka7

Жыл бұрын

Eurasian is just a combination of Europe and Asians to make them seem Caucasian when Asians aren’t European therefore not Caucasian. Arabs are western Asians, not Europeans or Caucasian.

Afroasiatic languages originated in Africa

Donc les noirs haoussas sont d'origine asiatique ?!

c'est complètement faux ta théorie, l'afro-aasiatique avait commencé en Afrique et propager en Asie touts les archéologues et linguistiques sont d'accord sur ça sauf toi .

@armajhkc609

8 ай бұрын

😂😂

Sou parente por parte de mãe dos nilo-saariano e omoticos e hadza

I from Israel and i am native hebrew speaker proud to be a native speaker of one of these beautiful languages Hebrew Arabic Amahari Tigri Maltese ❤

@dannyraymond375

10 ай бұрын

Hebrew was revived

@philliparieff7862

7 ай бұрын

@@dannyraymond375 Not exactly SPOKEN Hebrew was revived, but Hebrew was in DAILY use unbroken since antiquity, Jews used it daily for 3X per day communal prayer; and all Jewish Halakhic and Midrashic material read and studied daily was always in Hebrew.

Where is Hebrew?

@atbing2425

4 жыл бұрын

Hebrew is a northwest semitic, And it appears at the end.

@atbing2425

4 жыл бұрын

Northwest semitic language

@ibrahimhercules9466

4 жыл бұрын

Which part of the Levant is home to the proto-Semitic language

@atbing2425

4 жыл бұрын

We don't know on that specific level

Your "hypothesis" is totally fraud and far away from fact. The only branch which came from that Area is the Semitic one and it's very very young compare to the others.

The only branch that belongs to Arabian Plate is semitic. Others are African primarily even their phonetics are close to other African languages especially kemetic.

@mariegreenlife

2 жыл бұрын

Amharic is semetic, I'd like to see if a single Arab can understand even 10% of that language.

@the_only_and_the_one

Жыл бұрын

😂😂😂r u kidding me u even don't know a single word from them and just claim this ! Here in Somalia we use all the alphabets of Arabic and one thing more also Arabs came from an African woman so they r half African!!!

@mrad6707

Жыл бұрын

@@the_only_and_the_one Arabs are afroasiatic people.

@medhers1050

Жыл бұрын

Is there a stand alone Kemetic language?

@SIMO-eb1hw

Жыл бұрын

north african has nothing to do with sub saharan africa not in language nor the people

Good except ethiosemetic turned into Tigrinya Tigre and Amharic

@atbing2425

2 жыл бұрын

And northwest Semitic became Canaanite and Aramaic, but I didn't get that specific in this broad video. Watch this Semitic video instead kzread.info/dash/bejne/qat1stSqoJaegto.html

In the small writing in the beginning the writing stated this specific native languages started in the northern Alkebuulan area. The following slide of small words now says archaeologists is now saying the Afroasianitic language dialect came from the Levant. This is definitely not how I learned the history of the Afroasiaitic dialect, and I’m from Alkebuulan. The very last part was probably the only accurate thing on this video. THIS ENTIRE THING WAS REVERSED! IT THE OTHER WAY AROUND! THIS IS ASHAME THIS IS DEFINITELY FAULSE INFORMATION! TAKING AWAY FROM MY PEOPLE WHAT WEVE KNOWN FOR GENERATION!

@solomontrump

Жыл бұрын

It's propaganda to feed in the small hat origin of civilization

@Yakar-Yaoh.6651

Жыл бұрын

@@solomontrump: look up Science books in educational programs in grade school, high school, college the early 80s to the 2000s you see they all say life Begin on the continent of Africa. Nowadays, if you look in Books, they put a little twist to the little science and say because the primates, a.k.a. monkeys having white skin color, they say that humanity started off white, which is not true at all.

@solomontrump

Жыл бұрын

@@Yakar-Yaoh.6651 I'm not surprised we are facing textbook genocide, religious justified genocide, socioeconomic genocide, food genocide, etc.

This video is historically false and scientifically inaccurate, there is a consensus among historical linguist that afroasiatic began in the horn of africa, there is 6 branches and only one is found outside africa semetic. Semetic is a very derived language family and appeared last, the most archaic is cushitic and omotic.

@eho6380

2 жыл бұрын

There hasn't been a consensus, so spread your bullshit somewhere else

@afrikash

2 жыл бұрын

@@eho6380 Absolutely there is pple who advocate ur nonsense r like flat earthers

@HamiticKushitic

2 жыл бұрын

@@afrikash lol at you are comments. From what I can understand from you are comments is that afroasiatic originated in the horn of Africa and not the middle East, if that so? I do I agree with you. Peace.

Somalia is cushitque orjine

I see Arabic language was born in Saudi Arabia

@atbing2425

2 жыл бұрын

Ok, and semitic (green)?

@user-uc4om6pm4c

2 жыл бұрын

@@atbing2425 Yes, Arabic is a semetic language, is that what you mean ?

@user-uc4om6pm4c

2 жыл бұрын

@@atbing2425 The Saudi arabic dialect is the Arabic dialect most similar to classical Arabic language in terms of grammar and pronunciation

@ramzidz6150

Жыл бұрын

@@user-uc4om6pm4c no

You missed lingwa ta malta

@atbing2425

3 жыл бұрын

Yes I know, sorry :(. But then again this is a broad video

Alot of mistakes in this video

Flat out wrong it started in east Africa that is FACT not speculation or theory.

Omotic and cushitic peoples don't even look similar to middle easterns

@atbing2425

Жыл бұрын

And Indians don't look similar to Norwegians but they are still both Indo European.

@alemalem6728

Жыл бұрын

Your nose bro, your nose doesn't like other african like Nigerian or Congo, it's genetics nose from the north

The information in this video is accurate. For more information, read _Toward Proto-Nostratic_ by Allan R. Bomhard. In this book, he gives valuable evidence about the origin of the Proto Afro-Asiatic language. He even compares PAA to Proto Indo-European interestingly. Also, refrain from using the term Hamito-Semitic as it is inherently racist.

@azakzaak1691

4 жыл бұрын

How Hamito-Semitic is a racist ?

@hughcipher6229

4 жыл бұрын

No its not what are you smoking 😂This is an accurate video of the Urheimat of the Afro Asiatic language. kzread.info/dash/bejne/iYCom8uSms-5m9o.html What you just watched was academically horrible

@alareiks742

Жыл бұрын

Hamito-Semitic is just a old term. I see no racism of using it.

Make more history

@juanacolon8985

4 жыл бұрын

Reply

@atbing2425

4 жыл бұрын

Of languages? Or in general?

@juanacolon8985

4 жыл бұрын

@@atbing2425 Fart.

Afrasian originate in Egypt and spread in the middle East in 5000 bc

@atbing2425

3 жыл бұрын

Yes maybe, but nobody knows for sure

@enrico7474

2 жыл бұрын

Afroasians are way older than 9000bc 5000bc is a joke

@thegreatgeeljir8904

2 жыл бұрын

@@atbing2425 just because you don’t doesn’t mean nobody knows. You didn’t put much time to do research. Afro asiatic was born in Horn of Africa. Don’t you know that the oldest human bones are found in East Africa

There is stronger evidence that the Afro-Asiatic language was born around Tana lake, today's Ethiopia and migrated from the red sea first and then through the Sahel desert, Indian ocean and all the way to the gr8 lakes (cushitic). also the majority of semitic languages ​​are spoken in horn of africa, and not in the middle east. explan that. The majority of the Afro Asian family has its home in Africa and not outside.

@Phoenician_kang

Жыл бұрын

Explain the ubiquitous Paleolithic/Neolithic Levantine (Natufian) ancestry (autosomal DNA and haplogroups) among Afro-Asiatic groups?

Maltese

E-M81 NORTH AFRICAN

@jugurtha292

2 жыл бұрын

Haplogroup isn’t intertwined with language, ancient north african skeletons have EM78 with trmca of 12000 years while EM81 is only 5000 years ( and its cousins live in the middle east), i beleive North African were diverse in Haplogroup as shown in guanche study and kabylia study and probably the reason why em81 became widespread is because of numidia and its kings ( we might be all descendants of massinissa )

@jafermp3970

2 жыл бұрын

@@jugurtha292 can you translate me in french plzz

@jugurtha292

2 жыл бұрын

@@jafermp3970 thakvayli ketchini ?

@jafermp3970

2 жыл бұрын

@@jugurtha292 ivan agma

@chabanegaouaoui8606

2 жыл бұрын

@@jafermp3970 L'haplogroupe n'est pas lié à la langue, les squelettes nord-africains antiques ont EM78 avec une trmca de 12000 ans tandis que l'EM81 n'a que 5000 ans (et ses cousins vivent au Moyen-Orient), je crois que l'Afrique du Nord était diversifiée avec plusieures Haplogroupe comme le montre l'étude des guanche et étude de la Kabylie et probablement la raison pour laquelle em81 s'est généralisée est à cause de la numidie et de ses rois (nous pourrions être tous des descendants de massinissa)

why is it afro-asiatic when it originated in the levant(middle-east) 10,000 years ago? it should be called asiatic not afro-asiatic simple as that.

@atbing2425

3 жыл бұрын

Because there are languages in africa, when named after location it's usually the modern distribution

@AA-el4pq

2 жыл бұрын

No it originated in Africa !

@w.8329

2 жыл бұрын

Because of back migration from East Africans we have Eurasian dna

If Humans came from Africa 🤔 0:13.

You forgot Greece. They language is originally Afro-Asiatic.

@NubiansNapata

2 жыл бұрын

Greeks are not afro Asiatic... its Latin

@Cooom

2 жыл бұрын

@@NubiansNapata Close it is its own thing, part of the indo european

@NubiansNapata

2 жыл бұрын

@@supermavro6072 Greek language is not afro Asiatic

@supermavro6072

2 жыл бұрын

@@NubiansNapata It's about 40% Afro-Asiatic with Etruscan and several Asiatic loan words.

@NubiansNapata

2 жыл бұрын

@@supermavro6072 mate just cope ..Greek is an indo European language it's not afro Asiatic...

This is a theory, it makes more sense that the language were born in the Horn of Africa, where humans migrated from.

This is Psuedo the Proto Language is from Northern Ethiopia

According the Linguists Alan Gardner, Fergus Sharman and the scholars Theophile Obenga and Thom; Ancient Egyptian was a Bantu language. It was not related to Afroasiatic. Bantu related languages including Wolof (Mande) and Fulani originate in the East Sahara (West Sudan/South Libya).

@moanjelo9453

2 жыл бұрын

@@ohlangeni Do you know that some Afroasiatic speakers belong to haplogroup R1b? Egyptians’ language was a branch of Afroasiatic languages and they have nothing to do with Bantu speakers who happened to be a branch of Niger-Congo family.

@ohlangeni

2 жыл бұрын

@@moanjelo9453 I did not know of any Afroasiatic speaking population that has a sizeable carriers of R1b or R1a. Joseph Greenberg's classification of African language is with due respect all RUBBISH. The only certain genealogical relationship is Semitic and what erroneously called 'Cushitic'. All the other phylums Niger-Congo, Nilo-Saharan, KhoiSan etc do not exists as language families. The only reason Greenberg placed Old Egyptian as possibly related to Afroasiatic was geography. He believed that the original home of Afroasiatic is in the Nile Valley. No linguistic relations have been established between Afroasiatic languages after 150 of study

@AA-el4pq

2 жыл бұрын

There is no such thing as Bantu language.

@presidentmia890

2 жыл бұрын

@@ohlangeni ancient egyptians were afro asiatic closert to cushitic, they adopted everything from the cushites and called somalia aka punt the land of gods they even painted the somali and beja people like themselves

@muktarabdu9621

2 жыл бұрын

@notyourmom hhhhhhhh

The Afro asiatic language began in the Horn of Africa, and spread to the Middle East. Your map is so wrong because ppl live in Egypt along time before the time you said the Afro- asiatic language got there. And Egypt began on the south.

Tamazight does not belong to the Afro-Asian languages, but the Berber language is related to the language of the Greeks And the Basque and the Songhay language

@atbing2425

2 жыл бұрын

Of course, and German is related to Japanese And English is related to Zulu, And Inuit is related to Hindi.

@il967

2 жыл бұрын

Why do you think so? Do you just believe your baseless opinions to be fact merely becasue they are your opinions?

@atbing2425

2 жыл бұрын

@@il967 you can't argue with a pigeon

@muktarabdu9621

2 жыл бұрын

keep crying

If the Afro-Asiatic language was born in the land of Canaan it means that it is not a Semitic language but a Hamite language because the Canaanites were children of Ham, father of all blacks.

@khalidjabuuti2557

11 ай бұрын

Semetic is just name like cushitic and Coptic not son of noh sam

@homemdexercito1155

11 ай бұрын

@@khalidjabuuti2557 These names are biblical and come from the sons of Noah. Ham father of all blacks and like Canaan (his country was current Israel), Mizraim (Egypt), Phut (Libya) and Crush (Sudan, Ethiopia, Somalia, etc). Semitic was Shem.

False.