The Brilliant WW2 Bomber Design that Could Fly with a Thousand Holes

Автокөліктер мен көлік құралдары

Under the haunting glow of a pale moon, the massive Vickers Wellington Bomber from the 75th Squadron ascended over the Zuider Zee on the Dutch shoreline, hastening homeward after a triumphant raid on Münster.
The crew’s euphoria, however, was abruptly broken as a sly German Bf 110-night fighter appeared from thin air beneath the British bomber.
The Luftwaffe predator rapidly closed the gap, unleashing a torrent of lethal cannon fire. The barrage pierced the fuel tank within the starboard wing, igniting a wild blaze that threatened to consume the aircraft.
The crew desperately attempted to put out the flames using fire extinguishers aimed through a hole in the fuselage, but the fire continued growing, threatening to swallow the entire aircraft.
With few options left, Pilot Reuben Widdowson ordered the crew to bail out.
But the plane and the men inside were not ready to give up. With its unique geodetic airframe, the sturdy plane miraculously continued to fly, enduring the fiery punishment. This gave pilot James Allen Ward an idea.
Ward volunteered to clamber out of the flying behemoth and navigate to the burning wing, smothering the fire from the exterior. Donning his parachute and climbing out of the bomber, he was immediately nearly blown away by the extreme winds.
With white-knuckled resolve, he clung firmly to the airframe. As long as the aircraft continued to fly, he would continue holding and doing everything in his power to reach the growing inferno.
---
Join Dark Skies as we explore the world of aviation with cinematic short documentaries featuring the biggest and fastest airplanes ever built, top-secret military projects, and classified missions with hidden untold true stories. Including US, German, and Soviet warplanes, along with aircraft developments that took place during World War I, World War 2, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Cold War, the Gulf War, and special operations mission in between.
As images and footage of actual events are not always available, Dark Skies sometimes utilizes similar historical images and footage for dramatic effect and soundtracks for emotional impact. We do our best to keep it as visually accurate as possible.
All content on Dark Skies is researched, produced, and presented in historical context for educational purposes. We are history enthusiasts and are not always experts in some areas, so please don't hesitate to reach out to us with corrections, additional information, or new ideas.

Пікірлер: 357

  • @mred8002
    @mred80029 ай бұрын

    Some modern folks don’t realize that the fuel was high octane gasoline, not the kerosine used in modern jets. It is far more flammable.

  • @gbentley8176

    @gbentley8176

    8 ай бұрын

    I believe the high octane fuel was specifically developed to its optimum during the war.

  • @mred8002

    @mred8002

    8 ай бұрын

    @@gbentley8176 I recall that it had to wait for electrical starters, as as the compression rose, they couldn’t just spin the propeller to start. They would still slowly roll over those big engines to move the oil around. My pop was a flight engineer on B17s and B29. Told tales of having to climb out onto the (armed) bombs to kick them loose when they hung up on the racks. Brrrr. Guess it worked, as I’m here.

  • @matiaslarrain5618

    @matiaslarrain5618

    8 ай бұрын

    high octane fuel is not more flammable

  • @mred8002

    @mred8002

    8 ай бұрын

    @@matiaslarrain5618 I said it was far more flammable than jet fuel. There is no noticeable combustion difference in standard gasoline types. I specified the high octane as it was required for the higher compression rotary and turbo engines.

  • @jean-mariejm7404

    @jean-mariejm7404

    8 ай бұрын

    ​@@matiaslarrain5618wrong. High octane RON 130 is even more volatile than gasoline RON 98 or 91 in the US. Kerosene for jet is very close to Diesel , or "heavy fuel " in US. Gasoline will explode with a spark. Diesel needs compression

  • @davidpeters6536
    @davidpeters65368 ай бұрын

    My Dad flew in the Wellington in WWII before moving on to the Halifax. He told me many times how the geodetic construction saved many lives, including his own.

  • @Warpathallthetime
    @Warpathallthetime9 ай бұрын

    The fact he did this at night and at altitude is remarkable and more than human.

  • @AndyDrake-FOOKYT

    @AndyDrake-FOOKYT

    8 ай бұрын

    Now THAT'S a Mad Lad.

  • @Derpzila

    @Derpzila

    8 ай бұрын

    When men used to be men.

  • @davidelliott5843

    @davidelliott5843

    8 ай бұрын

    When men did what they could to stay alive.

  • @giganaut6007

    @giganaut6007

    8 ай бұрын

    adrenaline, fiery determination does to a man.

  • @cameronjohns8639
    @cameronjohns86399 ай бұрын

    Ward was a New Zealander. Absolute hero.

  • @terraflow__bryanburdo4547

    @terraflow__bryanburdo4547

    9 ай бұрын

    "Kiwis can fly!"

  • @todaywefly4370

    @todaywefly4370

    9 ай бұрын

    So were a lot of Kiwis.

  • @TheStrathmoreChannel

    @TheStrathmoreChannel

    9 ай бұрын

    Sergeant Ward was shot down and killed just over a month after receiving the VC.

  • @seanbigay1042

    @seanbigay1042

    8 ай бұрын

    Balls of stainless steel, ayup.

  • @colinmartin2921

    @colinmartin2921

    8 ай бұрын

    Bravery beyond belief.

  • @sichere
    @sichere9 ай бұрын

    My History teacher Mr Harper was a navigator on Wellington Bombers and he spoke highly of the Geodesic frame, as it held together after being hit by flack but unfortunately the shell took he head off one of the crew and it landed in Mr Harpers lap. He was a wonderful man.

  • @flickingbollocks5542

    @flickingbollocks5542

    8 ай бұрын

    OMFG

  • @gbentley8176

    @gbentley8176

    8 ай бұрын

    My classics master flew Wellingtons from the UK and in Africa. He lost part of his hand to gunfire and his tail gunner had wounds to his leg. He often spoke of the trust he and the crew felt in the aircraft no matter what the conditions. He was a marvelous inspiration to us all.

  • @Sugarsail1

    @Sugarsail1

    8 ай бұрын

    merely a flesh wound.

  • @sichere

    @sichere

    8 ай бұрын

    @@Sugarsail1 I've had worse

  • @samrodian919

    @samrodian919

    8 ай бұрын

    @@sicheredid yer catch yer own head?

  • @Lenmil
    @Lenmil8 ай бұрын

    My Uncle Charlie was a tail gunner in WW2. Their plane was MIA after a mission. Years later the wreckage was found in a swamp that was being drained. The whole crew was there. RIP those brave air crew.

  • @jugbywellington1134

    @jugbywellington1134

    4 ай бұрын

    I had a colleagues whose father had been a tail gunner. He'd been shot down and captured during the war. They usually didn't survive if the aeroplane was shot down. Those people were impossibly brave.

  • @BarryE48
    @BarryE489 ай бұрын

    Cometh the hour, cometh the man. He deserved the VC.

  • @danohanlon8316
    @danohanlon83168 ай бұрын

    An entire Wellington built in twenty-four hours? Now that is extraordinary!

  • @samrodian919

    @samrodian919

    8 ай бұрын

    Yes the film of it is on KZread. I watched it about a year ago. Well worth watching it.

  • @Kerbeygrip
    @Kerbeygrip8 ай бұрын

    My Dad flew 38 missions in WW2 in Wimpys. Lost lots of bits. Limped home often, but survived. Unsung heros. The Spitfires and Lancasters get all the press!

  • @jollyrodgergaming3579

    @jollyrodgergaming3579

    8 ай бұрын

    It's my fave ww2 era plane, such a beautiful design

  • @Hattonbank

    @Hattonbank

    6 ай бұрын

    Agree, just like the P51 and B17 overshadowed the P47 and B24

  • @elennapointer701
    @elennapointer7018 ай бұрын

    Point of order: the Wellington was not a 'behemoth' or a 'giant'. It was a twin-engined medium bomber, much smaller than, say, the four-engined B-17 or Lancaster. In size it a bit larger than the German Heinkel 111.

  • @johnfisk811

    @johnfisk811

    8 ай бұрын

    A heavy bomber at the time it was introduced.

  • @user-lt9py2pu6u
    @user-lt9py2pu6u9 ай бұрын

    I live near the factory featured in that movie and actually worked there during the nineteen seventies, some of the older workers at that time had actually worked on the Wellington's during the war. The factory still exists and is now part of Airbus Industries UK. Over the years this factory has produced a number of famous aircraft including Lancaster Bombers, Nimrods (fuselage only) and 125 executive jets (this was sold off to Raytheon). Production now centres on Wings for various Airbus aircraft.

  • @tonychallinor6721

    @tonychallinor6721

    8 ай бұрын

    Broughton! I was brought up near it too and was always so proud of the workers and local community

  • @alzheimer7629

    @alzheimer7629

    8 ай бұрын

    I lived in Northwich and know Broughton quite well. I do hope the old hangars have survived!

  • @pjb5757
    @pjb57578 ай бұрын

    My Grandad used to build Wellington Bombers in WW2, he tried explaining the geodesic design to me when I was a teenager in the atc. He has since passed away I just wished that i listened more and wrote it down. He really loved working on this aircraft.

  • @nicktecky55
    @nicktecky558 ай бұрын

    Unfortunately Sgt Ward died soon after this mission. His VC is not only extraordinary because of his courage, he was 'only' an NCO. Bravery had to be truly exceptional for anybody to get a VC who was not a Commissioned Officer. Different times today of course, but 'other ranks' would normally receive the next highest depending on the service. [Please note correction below, the VC was actually the exception to the rule] In other news, 75 (NZ) Squadron was made up of kiwis alone, although the ground crews were mostly British. There were quite a few (bracketed) Squadrons from different Commonwealth nations, but 75 (New Zealand) was the only one that was given the right to the squadron number after the war, as a mark of distinction and respect from the RAF.

  • @Evilroco

    @Evilroco

    8 ай бұрын

    actually the VC is meant to be the most "rank blind" of medals , a quick look a recipient's since inception shows the large majority who have revived it held no commission (and quit a lot of "acting /temporary officer ranks) It's very inception was that it was open to all ranks as prior to that only commissioned officers were eligible for awards and it was Queen Victoria's wish that this award for the highest gallantry was open to all

  • @nicktecky55

    @nicktecky55

    8 ай бұрын

    @@Evilroco Thanks for the correction, I was relying on memory, and what happened to a relative. Although that didn't involve a VC, but he was 'dropped' to an MID. I'll annotate my posting accordingly.

  • @ggee7391

    @ggee7391

    8 ай бұрын

    Stan Horex D Day was just a sergeant.

  • @heraklesnothercules.

    @heraklesnothercules.

    8 ай бұрын

    @@Evilroco Jeremy Clarkson made a superb 1 hour BBC programme about 20 years about the Victoria Cross - "The Victoria Cross: For Valour". It can be found on KZread.

  • @leatherindian
    @leatherindian9 ай бұрын

    My dad was with the RCAF and flew Wellingtons in the UK with 70 squadron. After one particular sortie, they landed with 112 bullet holes in the aircraft and 14 feet missing off one wing.

  • @eddhardy1054

    @eddhardy1054

    8 ай бұрын

    Oh my god, my grandad (Ted Hunt) worked as groundcrew on Wellingtons with 70 squadron 🥰🥰🥰

  • @pal6636

    @pal6636

    8 ай бұрын

    Impressive engineering for the day. I bet they would have really appreciated CAD back then :)

  • @BradleyGibbs

    @BradleyGibbs

    8 ай бұрын

    I didn't know there were feet on aircraft wings😏

  • @leatherindian

    @leatherindian

    8 ай бұрын

    @@BradleyGibbs yes. Several on each side.

  • @BradleyGibbs

    @BradleyGibbs

    8 ай бұрын

    @@leatherindian inconceivable!

  • @johncox2865
    @johncox28658 ай бұрын

    If you’ve ever clung to a motorcycle at anything over 135 mph, you have an idea what this young man endured. 😜

  • @michaelhowell2541
    @michaelhowell25419 ай бұрын

    Just a true example of an impossible situation faced by a man of immense courage.👍🇺🇸

  • @frenzalrhomb6919

    @frenzalrhomb6919

    9 ай бұрын

    Who was a New Zealander, in a British built Bomber. So what are you waving the American flag around the place for, mate? Oh yeah that's right ... America "won the War", all on it's own, what was I thinking? Pardon me, pardon me indeed.

  • @michaelhowell2541

    @michaelhowell2541

    9 ай бұрын

    @@frenzalrhomb6919 You don't like a thumbs up from an American disabled Vet?🖕

  • @visassess8607

    @visassess8607

    9 ай бұрын

    ​@@frenzalrhomb6919I don't think they meant that. Usually older people add their country's flag at the end of their comment for some reason and I think that's what they did.

  • @frenzalrhomb6919

    @frenzalrhomb6919

    9 ай бұрын

    @@visassess8607 Well I'm a helluva lot older than the internet (57) and I don't go about waving my flag in other peoples faces, nor do I presume that any "heroic figures" of WW2, MUST, by their mere proximity to said "heroic deed", almost by necessity, be an American, and therefore the "flag must be waved". It's "American Exceptionalism" revelling in all it's vainglorious B.S!!

  • @mknewlan67

    @mknewlan67

    8 ай бұрын

    @@frenzalrhomb6919good Lord dude, relax. Believe it or not history class and a love of WW2 taught me and lots of Americans were taught about British resolve and their heroic stand and subsequent retaliation against Nazi Germany. Maybe eat a candy bar?

  • @emmypuss4533
    @emmypuss45338 ай бұрын

    Had quite an emotional response to come across Ward's grave in the CWGC section of the Ohlsdorf Cemetery in Hamburg. Knew nothing of him then other than he had a VC and was in the RNZAF. Also felt sympathy for those buried in the cemetery who were killed in the firebombings. 🇳🇿

  • @jonhelmer8591

    @jonhelmer8591

    8 ай бұрын

    Cool Comment!

  • @robinwells8879

    @robinwells8879

    8 ай бұрын

    If you ever find yourself in Cambridgeshire then visit the RNZAF memorial at Mepal aerodrome which is mostly industrial estate now but still full of reminders of the locally much loved New Zealand squadron. Take in the Chequers pub in the village of Sutton too which has a fine array of photographs of the heyday.❤

  • @unwnme

    @unwnme

    8 ай бұрын

    I would not be able to forgive the fire bombings if I were German. And the audacity of the Allies to use videos of German civilians' burned corpses being shoveled around by bulldozers for their so called de-Nazification propaganda videos and to edit it together so that it looks like it is jews from concentration camps being shoveled around... man F hell.. that is cynical and atrocious beyond belief.

  • @Sacto1654
    @Sacto16549 ай бұрын

    It also proved Sir Barnes Wallis was a absolute aircraft engineering genius, a title (in my opinion) should also be conferred to Hawker Aircraft's Sir Sydney Camm and Lockheed's Kelly Johnson. Besides the Wellington, Barnes Wallis developed the famous _Upkeep_ spinning bomb used in the famous Dambusters raid and the very large Tallboy and Grand Slam earth penetrator bombs.

  • @rustytinfoilhatchannel4815
    @rustytinfoilhatchannel48159 ай бұрын

    Guy climbed out of a plane onto the wing to put a fire out, so you could be free. Never more needed to be heard, than in 2023

  • @CharlesYuditsky

    @CharlesYuditsky

    8 ай бұрын

    Nice Armet

  • @petehall889
    @petehall8898 ай бұрын

    My father flew a Wellington on the first two Thousand Bomber raids (Cologne and Essen), with a scratch crew while serving as an instructor between operational tours (they were maximum effort operations). I never asked him about the raids, but all crew returned safe. I know more of his experiences flying the Manchester and Lancaster. Wish I could chat to him now...

  • @DerMannII
    @DerMannII8 ай бұрын

    Sir Adrian Carton de Wiart survived crashing at least three times (if memory serves) in Vickers Wellingtons. By WWII, he was largely relegated to liaison activities, and he was downed en route to Yugoslavia due to engine trouble, and then a couple times in China due to engine trouble yet again. In his memoirs, he mentions his initial nerve of taking such a long flight and recalls the maintenance sergeant reassuring him before take off that the Wellington was brand new, he had personally torn the engines apart and inspected everything. Regardless, he woke up as the Wellington was about to plunge into the Adriatic. He kept getting issued Wellingtons in his time in China, as he travelled a good amount, and after his second crash in China, he was finally able to get a hold of a Douglas DC-3/C-47/DACoTA, which served him without fail until the end of the war.

  • @PhilipFear
    @PhilipFear9 ай бұрын

    The Wellington was an indestructible Aircraft, but only when flown by it's indestructible Airmen‼️👍‼️

  • @Bob.W.
    @Bob.W.9 ай бұрын

    My uncle died after his B-24 was hit by flak and then fighters on a raid over Munster over 2 years after Ward's mission.

  • @williamwoody7607
    @williamwoody76078 ай бұрын

    After all the movies I’ve seen this is the first I’m hearing of this? I can’t imagine this actually happened. I can’t believe I’ve never heard this before. Truly amazing and brilliant. He can’t possibly have bought a beer again in his remaining life.

  • @albertperrin694
    @albertperrin6948 ай бұрын

    I always admired British ingenuity above others. Barnes Wallis was an amazing designer. I’m glad he was on the right side during the war and afterwards. Although he survived, my dad was in Halifax bombers.

  • @Baza1964
    @Baza19648 ай бұрын

    I have a copy of the movie where they build a Wellington on a weekend . The workers did it with style. One lady left a party to come into work , still wearing a pretty dress , to help on it. They ALL were the greatest generation .

  • @worldcomicsreview354
    @worldcomicsreview3548 ай бұрын

    I have a part of one somewhere, I visited Brooklands in the 90's and they were restoring one that had been found in a lake. You could pay 50p for an unrestorable part that had been cut out of the frame.

  • @williamleidy6713
    @williamleidy67139 ай бұрын

    War makes opportunities for ordinary people to do extraordinary things .

  • @rjeder57

    @rjeder57

    8 ай бұрын

    Mayhap be. Even so, war is never the bringer of good things... Not even for the victorious. Idealogical, political, even economic and religious-level goals and differences lead to war. Political objectives suddenly mean very little to a mother burying her only son. Therefore I would caution against glorifying or glamorizing warfare... If you think there is something cool or sexy about war, or the warrior stereotypes, just take a walk through the halls of the US Army's Walter Reed Medical Center. It is more hellish than anything the Western world has experienced in a couple of generations. Americans are even more removed from the experience of war...the last time we had any artillery unit open fire on any American city was during our Civil War. Not one soul alive today has any idea how awful war truly is. Not when it's in your hometown. None of us even CAN imagine the terror and horror and the loss... Hey tho', our films and games sure do make war look like fun, huh? I think THAT is fucked up and stupid. I would also point out that we can never know what discoveries, inventions, and innovations may have been delayed, or even lost forever, by the unnecessary death of just one, among the tens of millions of civilians that were slaughtered in the wars of last century alone.

  • @boblewis5558
    @boblewis55588 ай бұрын

    My dad was an LAC during the war and worked on both Wimpeys and Lancs. He always said that they (both) were just built like proverbial brick sh*t houses and he couldn't believe how some of them made it back they were so shot up! 🤔🙄😲

  • @marcoslaureano5562
    @marcoslaureano55628 ай бұрын

    I'm surprised that it continued to fly after Sgt. Ward climbed onto the wing. How that bomber was able to hold up the weight of his giant brass balls while still maintaining altitude, we'll never know.

  • @I_Don_t_want_a_handle

    @I_Don_t_want_a_handle

    8 ай бұрын

    Brass balls have their own unique gravitational effects.

  • @CharlesYuditsky

    @CharlesYuditsky

    8 ай бұрын

    A hero is a coward who has had enough.

  • @jeremymorrall6750
    @jeremymorrall67509 ай бұрын

    I well remember my late uncle saying he flew a 'Wimpy' (as they were affectionately known) home with the side blown out.

  • @Rincypoopoo
    @Rincypoopoo8 ай бұрын

    Alas my wife's grandfather and his crew were less fortunate. On the same or a similar raid over Holland their Wellington was destroyed. The wreck has never been found and he and his comrades were listed as missing presumed killed. More recently a German combat report came to light that describes the downing of a Wellington in the right place at the right time. Poor guy. His wife was pregnant with my father in law...

  • @rod4095
    @rod40959 ай бұрын

    What a hero

  • @grahampauling5658
    @grahampauling56588 ай бұрын

    '75 Sqn' was in fact 75 (NZ) Sqn i.e. a New Zealand Squadron of the RAF. SGT Ward was a New Zealander - not British as stated here. After the war, the RAF allowed the Sqn number (i.e. 75) to be transferred to the Royal New Zealand Air Force (RNZAF). 75 SQN continued to serve in New Zealand until the Air Combat Force was disbanded by Prime Minister Helen Clarke's Labour Government in the late 1990s. The last aircraft type flown by 75 Sqn was the A4K and TA4K Skyhawk.

  • @birzky

    @birzky

    8 ай бұрын

    From my experience with family and non-family veterans, at the time of World War 2, many or most New Zealand servicemen would have called themselves "British" as well as "New Zealanders".

  • @grahampauling5658

    @grahampauling5658

    8 ай бұрын

    @@birzky 75 was a New Zealand Sqn flying for the RAF. They wore New Zealand shoulder flashes on their uniforms as was the practise at the time. This was the same for the Aussies, Canadians, Indians, South Africans etc they all wore their Country's shoulder flashes. This is as opposed to that other notable New Zealander Air Marshall Sir Keith Park, the Air Officer Commanding 10 Group during the Battle of Britain. Park was a full blown member of the RAF and so wore British shoulder flashes on his uniforms. The fact that even as a child we Kiwis considered ourselves "British" is a different thing.

  • @TheArgieH
    @TheArgieH8 ай бұрын

    The Wellesley was a long range single engine bomber, the Warwick was a twin engine beefed up successor to the Wellington (overtaken by the heavies), and the four engine bomber referred to was likely the Windsor (20mm defensive armament). All three were of geodetic construction. Wallis pioneered geodetic construction on (successful) airships.

  • @donaldasayers
    @donaldasayers8 ай бұрын

    As might be expected from the 'fishnet tights' geodesic construction they had problems when they were pressed into service as glider tugs, as the fuselage tended to stretch under the load, causing problems with the control cables running to the tail.

  • @flyingbeaver57
    @flyingbeaver578 ай бұрын

    Early in WWII the Wellington's designer, Dr. Barnes Wallis, was working on a large 4-engine successor to the Wellington, tentatively named (depending to who tells the story) the "Wellsley" or the "Warwick." The standard operating capacity at maximum normal operating range was to be a nice, round number, 10 tons. One mention of this design says that, borrowing an idea from Roy Chadwick (designer of the Lancaster), the bomb bay was to be a single unobstructed space. This would allow for carrying very long bombs - even then, Wallis was also working on "Tallbody" and "Grand Slam" - his 6 ton and 10 ton "penetrator" bombs. I've wondered many times what direction aircraft development might have taken if this project had gone to Production, and if Wallis' concept had been more widely adopted. Some of the most interesting descriptions of Barnes Wallis are those given, in various works, by the engineer and writer Nevil Shute Norway, who worked under Wallis during the 1930's. Writing as "Nevil Shute" during and after WWII, he published many books, among them a non-fiction work that described Britain's successful "private venture" airship, the R-100. The R-100 and its success story have been lost to the horror stories of the R-101 and Hindenburg, but Barnes Wallis's R-100 made a number of long trips, including to Canada, of which there still exists a lot of news film. Wallis was a true genius, and I'm sure the tens of thousands of aircrew who flew Wellingtons could add many similar stories to this one.

  • @samrodian919
    @samrodian9198 ай бұрын

    Sgt. Ward was an extremely brave young man, and obviously had a very large pair of steel ones hanging!

  • @alanmeasures8337
    @alanmeasures83378 ай бұрын

    24 hours that is impressive And what a hero ward was and never realised what a great plane the wellington was Respect to all.

  • @robinwells8879
    @robinwells88798 ай бұрын

    I am reading the book Luck and a Lancaster by Harry Yates, who was a bomber pilot based latterly at Mepal aerodrome in Cambridgeshire. Ward was part of the same squadron and based at Feltwell nearby. Mepal is my local former bomber base that was primarily a New Zealand squadron. I even drink in the same pubs as they did! Wizard wheezes bringing back their wounded kite like the dauntless heroes they were. They’re all very much still remember locally.

  • @JackClayton123
    @JackClayton1238 ай бұрын

    I’ve been outside an aircraft while flying relatively slow (about 60 knots) at 3,000 feet altitude during the day. Nonetheless, I can’t even imagine doing what the sargeant did.

  • @I_Don_t_want_a_handle

    @I_Don_t_want_a_handle

    8 ай бұрын

    Yeah, you really have to be careful when going to the loo to choose the right door ...

  • @JackClayton123

    @JackClayton123

    8 ай бұрын

    @@qed100 yep, same here. The wind is a surprise.

  • @CharlesYuditsky

    @CharlesYuditsky

    8 ай бұрын

    Yes I suspect the Wellington had to maintain 120 kts. I have experienced about 80 mph winds (according to the weather service, so I dont know locally what it really was) Fearsome wind.

  • @robflange
    @robflange8 ай бұрын

    Sgt Ward was a New Zealander Serving with the RAF born and trained in NZ His VC is on display Wigram Airforce museum

  • @apsdev
    @apsdev9 ай бұрын

    the zuiderzee was renamed to ijsselmeer in 1932 .. as they build a long dam (afsluitdijk) which turned the sea (zee) into a lake (meer). first flight of the Vickers Wellington Bomber was 1936.

  • @matt.willoughby

    @matt.willoughby

    9 ай бұрын

    In the fens, we call a lake a mere, pronounced meer

  • @TickleFingers
    @TickleFingers9 ай бұрын

    Good story. Very interesting plane and design. This was a good one!

  • @tonysmith2618
    @tonysmith26189 ай бұрын

    My father was in the Wimpies at the time, shot down a few times, had amazing stories to tell of the aircraft.

  • @frostyfrost4094

    @frostyfrost4094

    9 ай бұрын

    Wimpy was comic "book" character

  • @whiskey_tango_foxtrot__
    @whiskey_tango_foxtrot__9 ай бұрын

    Geodetic is super strong, robust and durable. But it is impossible to modify. What you build is what you get.

  • @seanbigay1042

    @seanbigay1042

    8 ай бұрын

    Oh. That would explain why it wasn't used more often.

  • @loddude5706

    @loddude5706

    8 ай бұрын

    'Impossible to modify'? - on a cellular structure? Certainly easier to repair, just cut back to good stuff & insert 'more of the same' to suit, sew the new fabric on, dope & paint.

  • @jaxcell
    @jaxcell8 ай бұрын

    These video's are the best assembled and presented on YT and most Cable Shows.

  • @jean-mariejm7404
    @jean-mariejm74048 ай бұрын

    I could visit the survivor wellington in Brooklands museum. Impressive engineering! Well done Wallis and Vickers

  • @sunnyjacksmack
    @sunnyjacksmack8 ай бұрын

    That was amazing.

  • @Bob.W.
    @Bob.W.9 ай бұрын

    That Barnes Wallace guy got around. Smart fellow.

  • @owenlaprath4135
    @owenlaprath41359 ай бұрын

    What is this "aluminum" you mention? Was it a new secret material? If so, why are you not elaborating on it? The ONLY light metal we know of that the Wellington was made with, is proper aluminium!

  • @rjeder57

    @rjeder57

    8 ай бұрын

    Aluminum is the lightest metal that (at least, in it's "unnatural" metallic elemental form) isn't violently hyper-reactive, and it is also super difficult to ignite...compared to Magnesium, Sodium, Lithium, ect..., ect... It most certainly will burn, but ONLY when ground into a powdery dust. Unlike, for example, Magnesium engine blocks...which burn like charcoal briquettes once ignited (but a hell of a lot hotter). [ I say, "unnatural", because it doesn't exist in the natural world. I mean, not as elemental Aluminum - the soft, shiny, silvery metal we all love & use so much of today. There never was such a thing as an aluminum nugget...not until the first beer can was tossed into a campfire, anyway. There is a hell of a lot of it in the Earth's crust, but only in forms that are essentially unrecognizable as being a metal ore...i.e.: not in rocks... Discovered first in 1825, by the onset of WWII, it was by no means anyone's "secret".]

  • @petegarnett7731

    @petegarnett7731

    8 ай бұрын

    @@rjeder57 You missed the point. British bombers were made of ALUMINIUM. American ones were made of aluminum.

  • @Kerbeygrip

    @Kerbeygrip

    8 ай бұрын

    Actually made of Duralamin.

  • @petegarnett7731

    @petegarnett7731

    8 ай бұрын

    @@Kerbeygrip Which is 90-95%aluminium, 4-9% copper +traces---. I am not sure, but I believe it was not used on the Wellington in order to avoid the copper induced corrosion. The flexibility of the frames before covering suggests that this was the case as the copper made a harder, more rigid alloy. I also saw a lot of the ones that made it back with much of the covering burnt off and serious damage to some of the framework.

  • @Kerbeygrip

    @Kerbeygrip

    8 ай бұрын

    The fuselage was built up from 1,650 elements, consisting of aluminium alloy (duralumin) W-beams that were formed into a large framework. That’s from Gracie’s. All the ref I can find say Duralumin. My husband RAE trained says so too.

  • @PaulP999
    @PaulP9998 ай бұрын

    You haven't a clue that you showed a far more rare and interesting thing, that experimental 20mm cannon dorsal turret, that was the real story - not the "strange" geodetic construction which every 14 year old boy into Airfix kits has known for decades. (not forgetting the wing climb story, that was well worth telling)

  • @etherealbolweevil6268

    @etherealbolweevil6268

    8 ай бұрын

    It seems to me that the title page still shows a Wellington with high altitude pressurised cabin in the front. MK VIA according to some sources. FL 30 pretty good for petrol engined bomber in the 1940's.

  • @loddude5706

    @loddude5706

    8 ай бұрын

    @@etherealbolweevil6268 Those poor engines - that final thousand feet must have taken forever, hope they took plenty of sandwiches. : )

  • @CharlesYuditsky

    @CharlesYuditsky

    8 ай бұрын

    I hope he does more videos on the Wellington and remote turrets

  • @johnfisk811
    @johnfisk8118 ай бұрын

    Loved the Vickers S Gun turret views and seeing it firing.

  • @burtvhulberthyhbn7583
    @burtvhulberthyhbn75838 ай бұрын

    Sgt Ward has to be one of the bravest men ever known. Victoria Cross? A given.

  • @johne7100
    @johne71008 ай бұрын

    Great story. I built an Airfix kit of the Wellington when I was a child. Glad I didn't have to fit all the formers & spars together.

  • @trampertravels
    @trampertravels8 ай бұрын

    The Wellington and the geodetic airframe was designed by Barnes Wallace who also designed 'Upkeep', 'Tall Boy' and 'Grand Slam'.

  • @ronsteiner1637
    @ronsteiner16379 ай бұрын

    Airfix have paid homage to that particular aircraft & crew in 1/72 scale in their re-make of this classic bomber… Barnes Wallis and Bomber Harris are my personal heroes from that conflict 🫡

  • @DrivermanO

    @DrivermanO

    8 ай бұрын

    Barnes Wallis - yes, great man. But Bomber Harris, not so sure. He nearly lost the war on his own by preventing long range Liberators being allocated to Coastal Command thereby nearly losing the Battle of the Atlantic. Churchill overruled him only just in time.

  • @clintmichigan9112
    @clintmichigan91128 ай бұрын

    Wallace was a genius

  • @scottwhitmire6613
    @scottwhitmire66139 ай бұрын

    Thanks Professor, Hope to see the 24Hr. Assembly film. Best to you Scott Whitmire

  • @M4ssExtinction
    @M4ssExtinction9 ай бұрын

    "Babe wake up, Dark Skies posted a new video"

  • @JEEDUHCHRI
    @JEEDUHCHRI8 ай бұрын

    Ain't a hope in Hell Nothing's gonna bring us down The way we fly Five miles off the ground Because We shoot to kill And you know we always will It's a bomber, it's a bomber Scream a thousand miles Hear the black death rising moan Firestorm coming closer Napalm to the bone Because You know we do it right A mission every night It's a bomber, it's a bomber, it's a bomber No night fighter Gonna stop us getting through The sirens make you shiver You bet my aim is true Because You know we aim to please Bring you to your knees It's a bomber, it's a bomber, it's a bomber!! -Motörhead.

  • @timofthomas
    @timofthomas8 ай бұрын

    My Grandad flew as crew in these beasts - crash landing more than once - including into a field of anti-landing poles right after take off, with a full fuel load, full bomb load and no wheels - the crew all walked away - though my Grandad had his flight cap which was on his nav/radio desk next to his arm, chopped almost in two by the prop coming in through the side of the fuselage. He went on to complete all his missions and switched to training multi-engine pilots of the Norwegian, Polish, Dutch and French forces how to navigate in the dark at very low level for SOE missions. How low? Well they took one four engine bomber underneath the bridge at Conwy Castle in North Wales (at low tide apparently) The instructor's notes after the flight (written by my Grandad) were something amusing to behold apparently - typically understated and polite. Needless to say it took a special kind of pilot and crew to fly these missions so there were some high jinx :)

  • @samrodian919

    @samrodian919

    8 ай бұрын

    I'm going to say something American now lol "Thank you for your service" granddad though in all probability he is no longer with us. So many of that great generation sadly now gone and going. Ah but that's life.

  • @jondobbie5401
    @jondobbie54019 ай бұрын

    the Wellesley was built before the Wellington and used the same construction method, and was the picture used when the Wellington was given the reputation for being the first

  • @jimfinlaw4537
    @jimfinlaw45379 ай бұрын

    The geodetic framework used in the construction of the Wellington bomber was designed and developed by Barnes Neville Wallis. Wallis did not design the Wellington bomber.

  • @ericadams3428

    @ericadams3428

    4 ай бұрын

    Indeed, the chief designer of the Wellington was Reginald Kirshaw "Rex" Pierson.

  • @TurpInTexas
    @TurpInTexas8 ай бұрын

    That was so freaking cool! What an awesome story!

  • @antr7493
    @antr74939 ай бұрын

    Geodetic Design.. wow.

  • @sixfootbear
    @sixfootbear9 ай бұрын

    Known as the Wimpy after Popeyes burger eating friend J Wellington Wimpy.

  • @denishoulan1491
    @denishoulan14918 ай бұрын

    What a brave man!

  • @raydunakin
    @raydunakin8 ай бұрын

    Fascinating! I've never heard of a geodetic airframe before. I wonder why it isn't more widely used?

  • @glennstubbs8232

    @glennstubbs8232

    8 ай бұрын

    It’s much more expensive to build. Three bids, low price, we have a winner! Metal tubes and riveted skin.

  • @nightjarflying

    @nightjarflying

    8 ай бұрын

    Geodesic is the correct spelling. In addition to cost it is much harder to install/access equipment from the outside via the diamond-shaped holes.

  • @grantm6514

    @grantm6514

    8 ай бұрын

    @@nightjarflying Geodesic and geodetic are both correct, both mean 'pertaining to geodesy'.

  • @jehovahuponyou
    @jehovahuponyou8 ай бұрын

    THIS WAS A GOOD VIDEO - *BRAVO!!!!!!!!*

  • @markbuckingham3631
    @markbuckingham36318 ай бұрын

    A ventral turret is on the belly whereas a dorsal is on top. But still a great video about a great yet unsung plane.

  • @moreheff
    @moreheff8 ай бұрын

    Wow, just wow!

  • @AndyDrake-FOOKYT
    @AndyDrake-FOOKYT8 ай бұрын

    Now THAT'S a Mad Lad.

  • @frasermitchell9183
    @frasermitchell91838 ай бұрын

    The Wellington (or "Wimpy") was certainly an excellent aircraft, and served throughout WW2, but to call it massive is ridiculous. It was a twin-engine medium bomber. The Lancaster, Halifax, and Sterling bombers were far larger, and 4-engined.

  • @clivebroadhead4857
    @clivebroadhead48578 ай бұрын

    Returning aircraft that sustained damage were carefully examined by the boffins. It was surmised that planes that did not make it back were damaged in areas not apparent in those that survived. This enabled for the efficient distribution of reinforcement and armour in the manufacture of newer versions.

  • @tomhaskett5161
    @tomhaskett51618 ай бұрын

    This type of construction was used on the earlier Wellesley bomber

  • @UR_HR
    @UR_HR8 ай бұрын

    Thank you for this amazing story, made me do some further reading.... Saddened to learn that kiwi James Ward VC was killed in in action 2 months after this event

  • @deckape714
    @deckape7148 ай бұрын

    Very well told Thanks

  • @dovidell
    @dovidell7 ай бұрын

    Avatar for this video shows Vickers Wellington B Mk.V /VI High altitude bomber . The B.VI's high-altitude fuselage design optimised for pressurisation had a solid, bullet-like nose with no nose turret, and a cockpit with an astrodome-like bubble canopy - source : wiki

  • @maxsparks5183
    @maxsparks51838 ай бұрын

    I was awarding Sgt. Ward the VC in my mind. Glad the British followed my lead.👍

  • @arightpest3367
    @arightpest33672 ай бұрын

    A feat of bravery that shows the human spirit at its highest and finest it’s such a shame it comes out when the world is going mad. More people should know his name.

  • @quick-and-easy
    @quick-and-easy9 ай бұрын

    Wow!

  • @Tbonyandsteak
    @Tbonyandsteak9 ай бұрын

    What a story

  • @12ar34sw
    @12ar34sw8 ай бұрын

    That was an excellent story.

  • @mikegrew7446
    @mikegrew74463 ай бұрын

    Incredible!

  • @patrickradcliffe3837
    @patrickradcliffe38379 ай бұрын

    5:24 Vickers Wellesley: Am I a joke to you?

  • @gdutfulkbhh7537

    @gdutfulkbhh7537

    9 ай бұрын

    I was going to remark on that, too.

  • @jp7585
    @jp75858 ай бұрын

    It's interesting that the Wellington was made with some additional strength, while the B-24 also used geodetic construction but was prone to being downed with almost any damage in key areas.

  • @samrodian919

    @samrodian919

    8 ай бұрын

    Ah but the missing secret ingredient was Barnes Wallace

  • @nightjarflying

    @nightjarflying

    8 ай бұрын

    The B-24 did not use geodesic construction. Your last ten words don't make sense [a missing word?] - what are you trying to say?

  • @glennpeters4462

    @glennpeters4462

    7 ай бұрын

    That's why they're called "key areas". That applies to anything!😆

  • @johndavey72
    @johndavey724 ай бұрын

    A very interesting frontispiece . This is a pressurised one off Wellington for very high altitude operational use .

  • @ripvanwinkle2002
    @ripvanwinkle20029 ай бұрын

    what a classic design! top 5 twin engine of ww2 EASY!

  • @ukulelemikeleii

    @ukulelemikeleii

    9 ай бұрын

    What would be the other four, do you think? Mosquito? B-25? Me--262? P-38? P-61 Black Widow? (The P-61 only because my dad was training to fly them towards the end of the war...)

  • @ripvanwinkle2002

    @ripvanwinkle2002

    8 ай бұрын

    @@ukulelemikeleii well Mossie has to go there too.. B 25 Ju 88 and the P-38

  • @bob_btw6751
    @bob_btw67518 ай бұрын

    I have often wondered why geodetic construction was not used in more aircraft than this one. Eg, why not the Mosquito with a ply sheathing for additional strength? Or the B-24 which was notorious for its being chopped apart by flak and fighters.

  • @SuperNevile

    @SuperNevile

    8 ай бұрын

    Very labour intensive manufacture. If you look at the Wellington at Weybridge museum, you can see all the cleating at the intersections. Mind boggling. It must have taken many hours of rivetting. Excellent aircraft for survivability though I suppose if the engines were shot out, it would come down anyway.

  • @alzheimer7629

    @alzheimer7629

    8 ай бұрын

    Further to the above which hits the nail on the head labour and time wise, there was a general shortage of aluminium which led to strict control of its use. The Mosquito was made from wood for that reason and De Havilland were refused aluminium! The birth of the Mosquito was a laboured one which, in my opinion wouldn't have been needed had the Westland Whirlwind been fitted with Merlins. The amount of money and time spent on new prototypes during the war would have been better spent on equipping what was in service with decent engines in my opinion! We live and learn. Or, maybe we don't! 😊

  • @I_Don_t_want_a_handle

    @I_Don_t_want_a_handle

    8 ай бұрын

    @@alzheimer7629 Could they not have made the geodes in wood? Too heavy, perhaps?

  • @alzheimer7629

    @alzheimer7629

    8 ай бұрын

    @I_Don_t_want_a_handle I imagine it would be too labour intensive, and as wood is never the same at a molecular level, certainly not to the same degree aluminium is; structural integrity could be compromised at far too random time frames. Essentially, making lifing of specific structural zones difficult. The other things to consider are that compression bonding was in its infancy as was adhesive 'science' for want of a better word, especially when considering performance of aircraft in terms of speed, manoeuvrability and operational roles had changed so dramatically during the proceeding twenty years. Because of this, the designers, material scientists, and structural engineers realised that wood really was on its last gasp as a material suitable for aircraft production, certainly in the mass produced and high attrition rate environment wartime brings. I was always fascinated by the "spruce goose" Howard Hughes built which, unfortunately, I'll never see for myself. I do apologise if I sound patronising, it's not my intention, but more to do with not knowing you, your background, or your level of experience/understanding of aircraft. Regards, Alzheimer.

  • @I_Don_t_want_a_handle

    @I_Don_t_want_a_handle

    8 ай бұрын

    @@alzheimer7629 Not patronizing at all, thanks for the reply.

  • @KiwiNightboss
    @KiwiNightboss7 ай бұрын

    At 7:07 correction needed = "... the Wellington's near-starboard engine ..." the Wellington is a two engine bomber, not four engined.

  • @yawningkitty457
    @yawningkitty4577 ай бұрын

    I wonder if it would be possible to build an aircraft using the same principle but using modern composites and how it would perform.

  • @CTNZ2000
    @CTNZ20008 ай бұрын

    Sadly Sergeant James Allan Ward VC was killed September 1941.

  • @carlredbird3054
    @carlredbird30548 ай бұрын

    Amazing design and complex

  • @AnthonyTolhurst-dw1nc

    @AnthonyTolhurst-dw1nc

    8 ай бұрын

    Parts count would have been high.

  • @uuzd4s
    @uuzd4s8 ай бұрын

    Been involved in Radio Control Aircraft and just finished a 22 yr long career in commercial aviation and have never heard of a geodetic airframe although I've seen a few Vickers Model Aircraft flown & shown @ "Warbirds" Events. Kewl Story, I learn something new with nearly every episode !

  • @Brookspirit

    @Brookspirit

    8 ай бұрын

    There is a Wellington at the Brooklands Museum if you ever get the chance to go there, it's worth it.

  • @daystatesniper01
    @daystatesniper018 ай бұрын

    If you know where to look there are several Wimpey high ground wrecks still around ,all in good condition

  • @masterlayangan2811
    @masterlayangan28119 ай бұрын

    *( MASTER LAYANGAN )* 🇲🇨 hadir menyaksikan keseruan pesawat bomber...👍👍👍⭐

  • @gomezgomezian3236
    @gomezgomezian32368 ай бұрын

    Always wondered how you would win a VC as an airman. THAT will do it!

  • @shawnmiller4781
    @shawnmiller47818 ай бұрын

    I am still trying to find a good reference book on geodesic construction in aircraft. Haven’t seen one yet

  • @flickingbollocks5542
    @flickingbollocks55428 ай бұрын

    Dorsal turret. Ventral are underneath.

Келесі