THIS CARRIER WILL COST MORE THAN 13 BILLION USA DOLLARS.

@Across_Media

Ай бұрын

costs will increase every year.

@NotMeJustborrowed

20 күн бұрын

A perfect example would be movie called War of Archimedes, This are only mock up expenditures, surely some of it will go straight to their pockets.........

@w.m.e.cantinoobtrader1334

19 күн бұрын

China would or russia would build it for 2 billion dollars.. in usa labour cost is too high then atleat 50% need to be a profit for company

@dennisestradda9746

14 күн бұрын

@@w.m.e.cantinoobtrader1334haha tofu steel Chyna and smoke stack ruskiland

@Thepaug2409

11 күн бұрын

@@w.m.e.cantinoobtrader1334 Thats why russia has, lemme see here **checks notes** ah yes, one that doesn't work and China has **checks notes again** ah yes, one that isn't done yet and 2 that weren't even made by them.

15 years to build a boat seems wild

@raidenj1295

9 күн бұрын

In 15 years china can build 4 carriers

@greatesteverog

9 күн бұрын

@@raidenj1295and they’re all shit

@badmoth242xl3

9 күн бұрын

@@raidenj1295yeah, roughly equivalent to the Kitty Hawk class at best, which was built in *checks notes* 1960.

@raidenj1295

8 күн бұрын

@@badmoth242xl3 does the kitty hawk have dual band radar, EMLs, 5 gen air wing?

@kinkarcana1293

8 күн бұрын

Its a test bed for new carrier features.

We need 200 new frigates to protect these magnificent ships.

@stephen7701

14 күн бұрын

how about we get 40 built thats planned and not take 12 years just to build the first 1 not due until 2029!!

@rileyh2675

14 күн бұрын

I think they should like promote you or something.

@petru-alexandrudragusin7124

12 күн бұрын

What about swarms of marine drones? Look only on how effective they are in the Black Sea in the Ruso Ukrainian conflict

@user-og4vk6mc9i

10 күн бұрын

@@petru-alexandrudragusin7124 Marine drones are coastal defence, pretty useless in a blue water setting. Plus, they offer no meaningful protection from the threats the carrier will be facing, which are missiles.

@dannovikoff8454

10 күн бұрын

No we don’t. They have an air wing. And a carrier group. Those are their protection.

The U.S Next Super Aircraft Carrier

@kjererrt7804

10 күн бұрын

a super mass grave to be more precise.

@raidenj1295

9 күн бұрын

@@kjererrt7804super coral reef 😂😂

@stussymishka

4 күн бұрын

@@kjererrt7804 nah this boat is the maker of mass graves lol

I can't wait for this ship be drawned as a anime girl in a few years

@giftybrown2410

7 күн бұрын

Kansen go crazy

@wellsilver3972

2 күн бұрын

in a few years? you think it takes a few years to draw an anime girl???

A moving city.

@kjererrt7804

10 күн бұрын

a moving cemetery

@greatesteverog

9 күн бұрын

@@kjererrt7804that’s your mothers mouth you’re talking about

@kjererrt7804

7 күн бұрын

@@MichaelTaylor-yb6gt exactly. but most likely it will break in two due to the kinetic impact.

The guy who managed to convinge them to name the ship USS Enterprise must be so happy and proud of himself 😂

@ConnorEdelstein

6 күн бұрын

I'm not sure if this was a reference to Star Trek or not but it might actually be just a renaming of an old carrier. During WW2 one of the first carriers the US Navy put out was the USS Enterprise and I believe it sank in the Battle of Midway during 1942. This might be a remembrance to that, or it could be that the admiralty has a preference for Star Trek, either way.

@valentino1005

6 күн бұрын

@ConnorEdelstein Well I wasn't aware of the other ship named the same but thanks for sharing this info that's surely interesting. But it would be funny if the ship was named after the spaceship in star trek :))))

@Gorilder

6 күн бұрын

it's named after the Grey Ghost CV-6 USS Enterprise; which was the most decorated vessel in WW2.. though the USN has had ships named "Enterprise" back to the revolutionary war where there was a Continental navy sloop named.. you guessed it "Enterprise" So, it wasn't a hard sell.

@ConnorEdelstein

6 күн бұрын

@@Gorilder Wow, didn't know that, thanks for the tip.

Americans people shoud thank your Government because there a willing to spend money to build for your protection and also from his allies God bless Amercia from 🇵🇭Philippines

@kjererrt7804

10 күн бұрын

you live in poverty over there in the philippines. you think the american people can afford this crap? with all the homeless and drug addicts they got? it will be sunk anyways.

@michaelrch

8 күн бұрын

This isnt for "protection". Its to pour taxes in to the pockets of the shareholders and execs of the defence contractors, and to fuel the US empire under whose control you live.

@tariktaskin8289

7 күн бұрын

Ofc you think we should thank them because it’s not your tax money being spent on it. We spend more on our military than the next 9 countries combined. Stfu and if you’re so grateful send money yourself to the US military because we don’t have a choice. We ofc need a strong military and some spending is necessary but not nearly to the extent or waste we do.

@kjererrt7804

7 күн бұрын

@@tariktaskin8289 your money is being paid to the PRIVATE owned MIC. this is why the budget is so huge. big money and less than satisfactory products. what do you need a strong military for? destroying small countries that pose no threat to US? this is what carriers are actually good for. nothing else.

@CyrusJ

5 күн бұрын

USA is the greatest country in the world…every country spends people’s tax money or country’s wealth to military…

The original "big John" is still waiting to be scrapped at Philadelphia Navy Yard

Anyone else find the irony with the military industrial complex naming a carrier after a president they assassinated?

@hammadulhaq1640

3 күн бұрын

shhh you're not supposed to say that

Love how america call it Humanitarian assistance :D

In all honesty, I'm surprised the building of these is more confidential. We have private ship yards and warehouses. Im surprised tbeyre built out in the open

13B is not so much if you consider USA has to pay 1T per year for interest on its own debt.

@across Media great video, but the use of graph where the Y axel is not proportional just to enhance results in the main line of the video, don’t make many sense.

@Across_Media

5 күн бұрын

Video still on improvement.

Back and forth arguments here for how great or how stupid this country is. The truth is that 75.4% of the people in other countries would choose to live here if not in their own.

@KindaGross

14 күн бұрын

weird I read it was 75.364567687656% of the worlds population.

@Karthagast

12 күн бұрын

"The truth is that..." you are fabricating your "truth" like crazy, LoL. 75.4% of the people??? What "people"? You and your friends?

@Hyper599

16 сағат бұрын

r/shitamericanssay

2:43 That's a blueprint picture of CV-67, not CVN-79.

of course it'll have f-35s

Spreading freedom! God Bless!

@stephen3143141

13 күн бұрын

😂

@Karthagast

12 күн бұрын

I'll assume you are being sarcastic, LoL.

@MichaelTaylor-yb6gt

8 күн бұрын

It's floating coffin of freedom. Yay!

The price of sovereignty is high. The human cost and financial burden is great, but if you never had to engage the enemy, you’re lucky. America exists because strong men do dirty jobs. Weak people cause hard times. Hardcore men solve hard times.

@stuartemmanuel3735

22 күн бұрын

No, strong man does what is right for their country by not building more weapons, but solving problems with the current US system, and for their fellow men, weak man seek to preserve the status quo.

@RK-cj4oc

13 күн бұрын

​@@stuartemmanuel3735 If you dont build weapons it will be far worse for the US. Stop being delusional.

In the '80's, a full dust up with ivan at sea, The Boat had a projected lifespan of 7 hours. We used to joke rather macabrely that post deployment of Our weapons load the smart move was to locate any land to punch out over. Never Again Volunteer Yourself

@user-og4vk6mc9i

10 күн бұрын

In the 80's when the soviets had an actual functioning military.

Russia doesn’t even have reliable aircraft carrier , they have one and it’s really old , it breaks down a lot, technically they don’t have it . In the meantime China I believe they have 2 and building the third one , If I’m mistaken but they have never been tested These facts tell you how superior the US aircraft carriers are

@kimloonyong6599

18 күн бұрын

Technology wise US aircraft carriers are better. China have 3 aircraft carriers and are building the fourth. Latest news i heard it was they launch drone carrier instead. Much smaller in size than conventional carrier.

@claytonbigbsy3880

13 күн бұрын

From what I have read the Russians and Chinas are not trying to compete with the US carries but instead have opted to build a massive amount of nuke subs, which currently outnumber the US by a decent amount if the article is factual.

@WhiteHoodMaster

11 күн бұрын

And France 😉

@charleyzacharia9878

11 күн бұрын

@@WhiteHoodMaster and Thailand 🇹🇭

@raidenj1295

9 күн бұрын

Chinese carriers have undergone training and testing for years 😂😂

If nuclear reactors are good and safe enough for strategic assets like aircraft carriers, why aren't we powering our cities with them more? Why are we not prioritizing lowering cost and deployment time of nuclear power plants at the same rate we are improving our military tech?

@DmitriVanderbilt

2 күн бұрын

Cost and time. A traditional nuke plant is like building an aircraft carrier, funnily, both costs billions and take many years to construct. The nuclear industry is also hampered by tight regulatory and national security controls; other energy sectors do not have these impediments and are easier and cheaper to undertake in (they also provide returns on investments much quicker than waiting 10 years for a nuclear plant to be up and running). Next-gen nuclear technologies are trying to address these problems; SMR and similar technologies hope to bring costs down by improving the "manufacturability" of reactors vs existing plants which are like building a bespoke design every time (due to location and land constraints). Small reactors the sir of, say, a standard shipping container, would open up use in a lot more areas, drastically expand the market, and bring down costs - but again, they are subject to extreme regulatory restrictions and most companies are still in infancy or preliminary stages. Fusion is also a hopeful Avenue for the future, but installations like ITER are again huge and expensive and take eons to build. The private sector is working on smaller, more agile solutions, but as always fusion seems "20 years away" as it has been since the 60s.

I hope it doesn't get assassinated

sources links?

Technology is great til it doesnt work. You need manpower and efficiency

@CausticLemons7

6 күн бұрын

Which is why no one has depended on tanks, ships, airplanes, helicopters, radars, electronic communications, digital sensors, and more for literally decades or longer.

It’s only strong against weak nations with no Air Force. Yemen has shown that even the most technologically advanced air defences can be beaten. Any conflict with a bigger more capable country will have these ships disabled within a few weeks if not days.

😍😍😍

Peace thru Strength! #America

This is only 25% of the size it should be !

@papatoushrew

14 күн бұрын

Do you have a source on this? Want to read about the origibal specs.

As a someone once said, we have money for war but no money for our own people in need.

@timmilder8313

14 күн бұрын

this generates much of our standard of living. Gotta keep everyone else in line.

@jager898

12 күн бұрын

I would rather have Russia and China in check. Think more of the future and not now.

@Thepaug2409

11 күн бұрын

Yeah and what about the thousands and thousands of job this ship generates? the value of the ship gets invested back in the country, not everything is solved with public housing.

@rolandjosef7961

10 күн бұрын

There will always be people in need. Some of these people are just too lazy to move. I agree that the Govt should help poor people in need as long as laziness is made a crime. There is no excuse not to thrive in America when immigrants coming here are doing well.

@someonetooknuggets

10 күн бұрын

Ironically war creates a lot of jobs which is what people need.

dude f35 on a carrier, jesus Christ lol

That is obsolete already!

American Military making the world look primitive, but our cities and infrastructure are primitive compared to other 1st worlds 🥰

A moving target for hypersonic missiles

@jkaine394

5 күн бұрын

These can easily be kept out of range of hypersonic missiles, and has aircraft to defend it.

@ScentlessSun

2 күн бұрын

The so called hypersonic missiles Russia and China use follow ballistic trajectories. They are very interceptible. They aren’t cruise missiles.

$13 billion starting, another $10 to 15 billion for whatever other costs, and climbing, but hey pushing close to $35 trillion in debt. What could go wrong?

Already gone the way of the battleship and we don't even know it.. Hypersonics.. We have no real counter.

its wild to see that I just saw a video about china spending a similar amount on infrastructure, lets see who pays off better at the end

Take half of the billions we sent to Ukraine and make more of these amazing American ships! 🇺🇸🇺🇸 USA

I thought this was named the USS Tax Collector? I guess they changed it

Can we please use the same reactors to power our cities?

@dannyzero692

13 күн бұрын

You better vote for people who are willing to do it

@nekopop8159

12 күн бұрын

We already have nuclear reactors. But the ones used on those ships are probably smaller and more compact to save up space.

@user-og4vk6mc9i

10 күн бұрын

In emergency situations they do, but the city power grid is expected to be able to survive on its own.

*WHAT A WASTE !!!* I'd rather have a 1990 Nimitz than a 2024 Ford. #Corruption

34 trillion usd debt and counting.

@leoAguilar-kx1pj

21 күн бұрын

All country have a debt 😂

@supagirusupagiru9932

21 күн бұрын

@@leoAguilar-kx1pj not all country have biggest debt in human history

@jg5875

17 күн бұрын

Agreed our national debt is exceptionally high. Can’t ignore it….at some point need to start paying it down and running surpluses

@Henry-xu5jg

14 күн бұрын

@@jg5875that’ll never happen

@RK-cj4oc

13 күн бұрын

​@@jg5875The US is paying debt every year. It is why so much is loaned to the US.

Americans are lucky they have these in their arsenal. Unlike us being bullied af by China and we can’t do anything.

AMERICA🇺🇲

It is absurd that it has been delayed this long with so many cost overruns. Our congress is asleep at the wheel. This is what happens when you shrink the number of military companies receiving government contracts to build our weapons system from guns to jets to ships. It is basic supply and demand economics. If you have only a few companies that can carry out work like Shipbuilding and fighter jets, then it's going to cost you more. Ukraine has proven that you need a lot of attritable systems. 13 Billion for one ship that takes 30 years to build just won't cut it. This kind of shit leaves us very vulnerable in a peer-to-peer conflict. The only thing we have working for us is how inept Russia and China are at the moment. Too many companies in the defense industry were allowed to consolidate and merge, and this is the result; all our weapons systems are absurdly expensive, and if we got into a shooting war with China, which is currently acting like a bag of dicks, we'd be in trouble.

Big shiny target for DF-21

@xyzaex

13 күн бұрын

lol try and your country is no more 🤣

@hibatulwafi2523

12 күн бұрын

The US Navy is not as stupid as you

@flaneurfilms1940

11 күн бұрын

@@xyzaex my country? I live in Brooklyn dummy.

@scottwolf8633

11 күн бұрын

DF 21 splashed by the RIM 174.

@raidenj1295

9 күн бұрын

Big coral reef for Taiwanese fish 😂😂

People when america makes new weapons: imagine how many houses could be built with that kind of money ! People when russia makes new weapons: how can russia’s economy still grow faster than the one of the country’s sanctioning it ? (I’ve seen both those comments)

@scottwolf8633

11 күн бұрын

Since the, "War on poverty", at least 22,000,000,000,000 dollars have been stolen, I mean, "Redistributed", to those that refuse to make the effort to rise above their poverty. Not to mention the latest wave of invaders, whoops, "Newcomers", that the left require the Taxpayers to foot the bill for everything.

They can't think of a new name?

@user-og4vk6mc9i

10 күн бұрын

Naming conventions exist.

@bobk4438

10 күн бұрын

@@user-og4vk6mc9i They can't think of a new name?

@someonetooknuggets

10 күн бұрын

@@bobk4438 why would they? they don't have to, creating a good name is hard anyways and you have to get people to agree with the name.

@bobk4438

10 күн бұрын

@@someonetooknuggets USS Richard Best. That wasn't hard.

Why same design of china carrier

@dennisestradda9746

Күн бұрын

Wtf 🤣 chyna copies everything

I think it’s more important to build more destroyers and frigates. If they add this they will thin out carrier escort ships overall

' keep up american shipbuild make many more better bigger powerful americans aircradts carriers with many arms weapons / radars systems

Humaterian assistant 😅😅😅😅

I think it’s only limited to ve ised against countries or groups who have no chance or retaliating… don’t get me wrong there’s nothing wring in showing strength… but I don’t think aircraft carriers will do well in the next world war…

Call me crazy, but I would have preferred a couple more modern submarines which are safe from modern ballistic missiles and can patrol unnoticed under the ocean.

@kjererrt7804

10 күн бұрын

you are not crazy. carriers are obsolete.

@dev-df9kx

9 күн бұрын

@@kjererrt7804 no they aren't

@dev-df9kx

9 күн бұрын

@@kjererrt7804 until you realize they can detect the submarines and can be used as fighter jets launchpad

@kjererrt7804

9 күн бұрын

@@dev-df9kx what submarines what jets wtf are you talking about

@dev-df9kx

9 күн бұрын

@@kjererrt7804 you said carriers are of no use, i just told their uses

So sick

Hope it never sees a real combat.

This is the reason for inflation & poor health care in US!

I am listening to a chatGPT script read by some AI voice right?

@Across_Media

8 күн бұрын

🤣 to much listening Ai voice.

And all it takes is one missile to sink...

@user-og4vk6mc9i

10 күн бұрын

Nope lol, one well aimed missile to mission kill, not sink. It is incredibly hard to sink even ww2 vessels, and damage control is far more advanced than before. Anyway good luck getting that one missile through the several layers of defence the carrier has through her escorts. Hundreds of SAMs, and decoys.

@raidenj1295

9 күн бұрын

@@user-og4vk6mc9iso 2 missiles ?

@ManufactureBelief

5 күн бұрын

@@user-og4vk6mc9i and hypersonics..

It's powerful so long as it avoids the Houthis.

@giacomogiacomo1194

12 күн бұрын

Never show up your stupidity in the comment section 🤣

Todays battlefield is way past Aircraft Carriers They are a relic

Another garage

Corruption is going to break the American bank. There is no honor in the world.

we know these "humanitarian" operations throughout the world very well. no thank you but no.

You can have the newest, faniciest l, most high-tech carrier you want, but the problem is (just like the Gerald Ford), nobody but the engineers who built it are going to know how to operate it.

why is the script's grammar and the narrator's pronunciation so bad?

@Across_Media

3 күн бұрын

Really?

@Nick-tv5pu

3 күн бұрын

​​@@Across_Media sorry, but, yeah. Some pronunciations are off as well but that could simply be due to the narrator being unfamiliar with the subject material and it being the first/one of the first times they've encountered specific words. Granted, it's not like it's incoherent or anything, but it sounds like whoever wrote the material may not have English as their first language.

How can you make videos nowadays and don´t have the metric system included...... hell normaly you should ditch the imperial system and just use the metric system... but at least do both....

thanks god it's not built against russia. otherwise that would be such a waste of the taxpayer's money.

Most notably, the Nimitz class. Carriers will be 250% more reliable.

RIP tax money

Share your thoughts: Me: how many cheap Chinese missiles will it take to overwhelm the AAA defenses on the entire carrier battle group and get one to hit one of those two nuclear reactors, wasting $13 billlion, 9,000 sailors, and contaminating that part of the ocean for the rest of our species' existence? I bet they won't have to spend $13 billion to get enough of those missiles to do it. This is a vanity project, a luxury that we frankly can't afford anymore, especially not with the idiots in charge of the State Dept and DoD right now. You can't just paint the flight deck with a gay rainbow, crew the ship with trannies, and think that's going to accomplish anything.

@greerjones9472

13 күн бұрын

So your problem has nothing to do with weapons procurement, which you obviously know nothing about. You're problem is about "wokeness", which truthfully I don't give a fuck about, the Navy can choose to do whatever the fuck they want and support whatever causes they choose to if it makes the crews happy. They know how to do their jobs on that carrier and that's the important part, trans not trans, could care less. If you can targets weapons, maintain battle systems, sortie aircraft, why does it matter? Does them not doing that automatically make them better? Carriers are the premiere surface vessel, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future. They're not invincible sure, but they're still basically mobile fortresses which can move in and out of protective rings, can dish out punishment quick and harsh, and are basically global information centers. If an attack is ever going to seriously harm the operability of a USN carrier, it's not going to be some " cheap missile" because "cheap missiles" is like swatting flies, and it's not going to be without relations as an entire swarm of warplanes, bombers, and return fire pulverize anything and everything in retaliation.

@user-og4vk6mc9i

10 күн бұрын

4 arleigh burkes alone have 384 VLS cells, and a carrier deployed to a hostile zone will have more ships to escort. Quad packed ESSM and PAC-3s, very capable decoys and further point defence (CIWS SeaRAM) you will need a lot of those "Cheap" chinese missiles to overwhelm defences, and a lot of platforms to deliver them. Which the carrier group will sink or splash before they can get in range.

don't touch the yankees boats

But yet our bridges and roadways are falling apart Stick it to the taxpayers what else

@wtftiger666

20 күн бұрын

How about stop wasting money on other government spending. Welfare and other social bullshit

Grow up

This floating Target can be taken out with two hypersonic missiles that cost a fraction of one of the planes on board.😮

@LiterallyMojo

25 күн бұрын

Armchair expert over here. Please continue thinking this way so that russians don't actually try to develop something that could actually do what you say

@jackoshea7668

24 күн бұрын

@@LiterallyMojo do you think they don’t already know?

@CrazyDee279

22 күн бұрын

Apparently this meathead never been in the military. 2 hypersonic missiles, lmao. Not one Carrier taken out WW2. Gee, nothing is around the Carrier to protect her I guess. LMAO

@mineralwater6736

14 күн бұрын

@@jackoshea7668😂😂 if the Russians or the Chinese could do that the would already done it but guess what?? They can’t.

@jackoshea7668

14 күн бұрын

@@mineralwater6736 only because they haven’t yet had the opportunity mate, but I wouldn’t like to see my theory tested .There is no defence against a hypersonic missile. 🤣🤣

They should just order a carrier from China they build a new carrier every two years and have more ship yards than half the globe. Probably get three for the price of one.

@jeffpowell6224

22 күн бұрын

Chinese military tech is s***!!!!

13 billion dollars! Imagine how many frozen microwave burritos one could buy with that money, instead of buying a ship for murdering kittens at sea.

this is the most stupid video in 2024

@Across_Media

12 күн бұрын

Thank

@user-og4vk6mc9i

10 күн бұрын

@@Across_Media Why is bro thanking

Imagine!!!, how many houses you can build for the poorest people and how many meals we can buy for the hungry in this country with that kind of money 😢.

@urosjovanovic3142

Ай бұрын

Both things are important

@radustana

Ай бұрын

womp womp

@markf37talon

Ай бұрын

Imagine!!!, how many house would be destroyed and how many people would be starving, if China determines its capable of overtaking Taiwan.

@TO-dl2gg

Ай бұрын

Imagine if we stopped giving our money to everyone else we’d be more than able to do both ..Have carriers and take care of our less fortunate fellow citizens!!!!

@tommypaget2294

Ай бұрын

And then America will conquered by China?

It can still be sunk. Money would have been better spent on housing.

@Meself-xt7ej

22 күн бұрын

Give me some money.

@mineralwater6736

14 күн бұрын

Ok go tell that to all the rich celebrities.

@mineralwater6736

14 күн бұрын

And houses can still be destroyed.

@dennisestradda9746

14 күн бұрын

Haha chyna , 800 million poor rural han make less than 5 dollars, no healthcare or safety net besides real-estate. Oh wait thats collapsing too

@greerjones9472

13 күн бұрын

Houses can still collapse. The fuck are you on about?

Dang, and one F35 is $115 billion....

@itsallgoodaversa

12 күн бұрын

No, it’s $85 million. Can you provide your source? You are over 1000 times off.

@user-og4vk6mc9i

10 күн бұрын

@@itsallgoodaversa 115 billion is the PROJECTED cost of the whole program, basically the RND of essentially 3 aircraft, the cost of production, future orders and future upgrades. The F-35 is 85 mil for a single airframe.

Build the carriers and build housing for those who need it and for once please stop whining about money because all money is is worthless paper no matter which nation prints it. GOD DID NOT NEED MONEY TO DO WHAT HE DID. MONEY IS MAN'S WAY OF CONTROLLING MANKIND BY WAY OF GREED. MONEY IS POWER BUT KNOWLEDGE IS REALLY MORE POWERFUL THAN MONEY.

@mineralwater6736

14 күн бұрын

😂😂 ok buddy good luck surviving with just knowledge.