I thought with digital painting we already learned that quicker process to finished product means more product for less money. You don't have more time because that freed up time is devoted to getting out more product to compensate for the lower pay rates. It's pretty obvious that's how this plays out.

The problem with AI is that what it makes IS NOT YOUR CREATION, it might look like what you wanted it to look like, but IT IS NOT created by you. AI is not "your vision", and when making decisions by hand, you discover changes you want to make, designing is trial and error, and AI doesn't make errors, at least not the one they are striving to make. Even if you overpaint AI image, the base of imagining is not yours, and if you are honest with yourself, you will always know that it in not your design, that you collaborated with laundered version of millions of artists without their premission, AI in current state is immoral, always.

@radioforthebirds

10 ай бұрын

Has anyone ever tried the exercise of drawing with your non-dominant hand? People often find that while the drawing is sloppy, the design is cleaner somehow, because you're drawing more with your mind than with the habits of your primary hand. I say this because it's probably vain to assign some sacredness to the work of one's hand, which is probably more often guided by habit than by divine inspiration. What if an artist was paralyzed, but still wanted to produce images, so he hires a draftsman to dictate his pictures to. Through the whole process he is making verbal adjustments: "slightly to the left, more square on top, mix in more green, brighten that up. Let's try it in pen instead, etc..." Sometimes he can tell the draftsman: "try like ten random things here and We'll work from the one I like best" Even though this artists hand never participates, I would still say that it is his vision that is being put on the page, and not the draftsman's. Have you never imitated another artist's style without their permission?

@HumanBeing2137

10 ай бұрын

@@radioforthebirds "try like ten random things here" is the key here, those are random things created by this draftsman, and he will never be detatched from the final product, it is his experience that is giving live and expression to the piece, even if it is on someone's command. The fact that this vision matches the vision of person commenting, it is just that, vision. The paralysed one is not the creator here, he is not expressing anything through the piece, the draftsmen is expressing those things for him. The image created here is a comission, and is not a creation of said paralyzed person, no matter how brutal that is to read, this is not their expression, it is just an expression that matches well enough to what they'd like to see. Paralyzed argument is a really bad strawman, it serves only to set unrealistic expectation to base your whole argument on, and not even 1% of AI users will work like this. And no, I have not imitated any artist without premission, but if I did, it wouldn't be immoral, because Thought process of humans is different to that of neural system AI learning, people don't decompose noise, they decompose abstractions, and even if we did make copy of human brain as machine, why would we again give machines any rights? It's not like we allow machines to do anything humans can, we don't allow machines to shoot people instead of police, we don't allow robots to record people, there is a difference in scale of what human can do and analyze, and what machine can do. Copyright law was created as insentive for people to share their art without the fear of someone taking it, and reselling, or using it to directly devalue original creator's market share. What insentive do artists have to share their new stuff online if it can be fed to machine to generate 1000 more without their help, this will stagnate the art forever, and if you are at least a bit honest with yourself you will see that this is not a solution that can work long term, how do we pay person who trained 20 years for your entertainment (art) of course, by taing the result of their work, and throwing original author away, because you don't have to pay machine.

@radioforthebirds

10 ай бұрын

@@HumanBeing2137 I don't think it's like existentially brutal since it's just your personal definition of expression. In my opinion, a film can be a director's expression, even though they don't participate in every aspect of the production. Some films are made where it could have been directed by anyone, yet some films bear the distinctive style of a strong director in every element. It seems pretty clear to me that Quentin Tarantino has a recognizable style in his films, and I would call those films his vision and expression. But I can assume from you definition that he would have had to build every prop by hand and speak every line and play all this music himself for the film to be his expression. There's the expression of each independent element, but there is also the meta-expression of how to select and combine the elements. I think that the AI tools offer an unprecedented way for artists to refine their ability for meta-expression, for an interesting vision rather than "mere" technical execution. I do believe that most artist have to get their first 1000 bad pictures out of the way before they start to produce something interesting, and this is a good way to to get those pictures out of their system fast. I think there's some distinction to be made between craft and expression. I came up with the extreme example of a paralyzed artist to fully separate craft from expression, and to point out that even though the product can be the craft of someone else, the expression lies in all the choices of what to illustrate, when, how, in what format, in what colors, with what shapes. I think there is much art just in making interesting choices. It's just another tool, and the artist with 20 years experience is going to come up with much more interesting results than someone who just wants to see Jack Sparrow with Hard Abs or something. Those 20 years represent not only physical craft, but also a refinement of taste, sensitivity to composition, knowing how to reject the cliche, etc. so I don't think they have that much to fear in terms of loss of work. The best chess players are still the best chess players, and the engines give them fresh and truly novel ideas that centuries of human theory and bias overlooked. I think we can expect a similar flourishing of fresh ideas from AI... and the best artists are still going to be the best artists because they know how to recognize them.

@HumanBeing2137

10 ай бұрын

@@radioforthebirds yes, AI user is more akin to customer than a director, you see, the problem is that AI is not some magic box, it is cobination of weights that are representation of certain existing ideas, you can't create anything that doesn't approximate something it has been trained on. By your definition customer at sandwich shop is a director, and the product is his expression, it is exactly what he describes he wants, but it wasn't made by him, even directors of films don't get copyright for their works, only producer does, because ideas can't be copyrighted, yet expressions can. As brutal as it may sound, paralyzed person is just not in luck if they want to truly create something, they mostly can't, and this romantic idea that reality can be whatever you want, just because it would be nice, is just a delusion. You are laundering not only draftsmenship of millions of artists who didn't constent to it, but also their ideas and personal touch that they gained through years of training and mistakes. Ordering pizza is directing, and directing is a form of art, but the fact that film matches vision that director had, doesn't mean it is his expression, it is an expression of every person who taken part in it's crafting. Vision of paralyzed person is an idea, and if they speak it, those words are an expression of the idea, but to express idea visually you have to have direct control over somethin, AI controlls itself, you can ask it to change things in certain areas, but ultimately it is AI who has FULL control over what comes out

@radioforthebirds

10 ай бұрын

@@HumanBeing2137 It's not so obvious that the human brain can create anything it hasn't been trained on either.. And actually yes, I'd say that if your sandwich order is distinct and unique enough that it is recognizably yours, then it is your creative expression. The person who invents a new recipe is more creative than the person who cooks by it. The local sandwich shop might even name your sandwich after you, if enough people say, "hey I want what that guy is having." There is the potential to just order the sandwich #3, or you have the opportunity to be creative. Ai art offers the same opportunities. I'm pretty sure an idea can be copyrighted.. Disney will sue me if I go selling paintings of Aladdin, even if I make them fully by hand. But I don't think they can sue me for drawing in the style of Glen Keane. Plenty of artist copy the style of other artists, this isn't something you can suddenly ban because the process has become mechanized. There's no such thing as "the brutal truth" here.. we each have our definition of creativity and expression - those definitions are semantic tools designed for some purpose. I think you'd be more convincing if you were just up front with your purpose rather than claiming to know the brutal truth about reality or whatever.

After I finish toiling away by taking notes of my 3 hour proompting tutorial I'll finally be like the great proompters that inspired me to take on such a mountainous journey.

Well said my dude. “Proompting” I heard someone say “prompt engineer” recently. Its hard to imagine where the engineering part would be in that. Maybe with some of the more obscure models there’s a bit of coding. But the idea of your job just being ‘PROMPTING’ sounds like hell

@gickygackers

10 ай бұрын

'prompting' is just a diss at programming in natural language(like english). Who knows, maybe you're AI and I'm prompt engineering a vitriolic response from you right now. I'm already in hell.

Chris Do, the guy you show the video of, is the definition of a “bro” hustle culture designer.

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

I *think I’ve seen maybe a couple of his other videos. He looked familiar.

@elijah.onefofo

2 ай бұрын

Totally agree, his techniques just can't be applied to the reality freelance designers live in. 8 months later, the project budgets are 5x lower than they were, it's crazy

@dharmaram7527

19 күн бұрын

Strange times for sure. What’s interesting is Chris created a bot response feature in his pro membership. “DoBot™ is like having Chris Do in your corner. Built on ChatGPT, DoBot™ is the ultimate Teaching Assistant, trained on Chris’ vast teachings and wisdom.”

The copyright issue is also massive. It truly saddens me when I see people basically saying 'Let these companies steal everything that every existed to make billions, simply because they are the first to do it.' If an AI model was trained on the work of humans, how can anything that it creates be it's own? And before you say 'people do the same thing!' AI are not people. Even 100 years from now, if we still exist in a society that resembles this one, a hyper-intelligent AI will still not be a person. It is not deriving inspiration from work and creating it's own. It's scraping details and emulating work to enrich it's creator.

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

We news to wake up and protect our work. File suit.

@PARTYSEASON

10 ай бұрын

@@StudioPractice1 I'm a writer by trade and comedian (who does not get paid) so I empathize with visual artists. While live comedy may have a decade or two before AI can emulate what we do, the work I am paid for (copy/ideation) has already seen a massive shift. Something else I find strange is these hyper-intelligent, hyper-fast AI's are seemingly incapable of producing an audit of what work was used in creating it's output. I'd ask anyone supporting AI as the 'future of everything,' do you actually believe a system that can create copy, video, images that dynamic at that speed is actually incapable of reporting where / from whom it pulled that data? Do you think that's by design or simply a constraint of the system? The entire thing reminds me of Bitcoin. Not in the technology but the narrative around it. They told everyone it was the future of currency, but the people at the top knew exactly what it was. A long con, a rug pull from the start. A way to multiply capital. Its use as currency was only leveraged by people buying drugs on a Tor browser. If in 10 years it was revealed that Satoshi was a conglomerate of US/UAE/Indian billionaires, it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest. AI is inevitable, but trust this: there are human beings behind its design that do not care about what the future looks like as long as they get theirs.

@sylvestreb1302

10 ай бұрын

@@PARTYSEASON Yes the reason you can't have the source is technical, not a plot. And they are actually trying to make it able to retrace to some source for obvious fact check reason in the case of chatGPT, but it's hard and yo will only get the mains sources, not all.

@PARTYSEASON

10 ай бұрын

@@sylvestreb1302 what’s the technical reason for its inability to audit which source contributed to an output.

@sylvestreb1302

10 ай бұрын

@@PARTYSEASON The model is like a bunch of artificial neuron that are linked together, when it learn a new picture, it will slightly change the connection weight, but the image is not stored and all the images changes some connexion when it learn them. When you create an image it use all those connections, so you can't tell which one is responsible for your creation.

OH GOD I'M GONNA PROOOOOOOOOOMMMMPPPTT AUUUGGGHHHGHHHHHH

@avant-gardener

10 ай бұрын

oh dawg, you already been promted

@alex-dh8zy

10 ай бұрын

I PROOOOMPT MY PANTS

The art institution where I teach has recently started offering classes on prompting techniques. What they should be offering is in-depth art/design history and visual literacy courses. Ugh🙃

@StudioPractice1

5 ай бұрын

I hate to say this, but “get F’ing real” Proompting is bullshït. Teaching it is playing into the transactional nature of what college has become.

@dameon.design

5 ай бұрын

@@StudioPractice1 1000% right! 🤞🏼🙏🏼😭

@MarkShepherd1

Ай бұрын

Haha, critical thinking and skills have left academia decades ago! Visual literacy will be all style, trend oriented to the max and cannibilistic! Sadly the framework is speed and effortlessness.

@MarkShepherd1

Ай бұрын

Wait if you’re using the tools how can it not be in the classroom?

The surface response to ML based art generation tools is that they will give us more time to think about what we want to do, but the reality is that it will only create a situation where we will be expected to produce more and that more will be devoid of meaning because it will be devoid of thought. I had lead a team of retouchers years ago in ecommerce and we had targets of 100-200 images a day, EACH , with these tools that number could easily become 2 - 4 times higher, do the math and that means in an 8 hour day you have 1.2 minutes to work on an image and check it for errors and fix what automation misses. Using ML to generate moodboard images? sure but imagine being expected to crank out multiple high quality and polished designs a day? from idea to final deliverable, that sounds hellish

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

Hellish

@aaronwinters916

10 ай бұрын

All these evangelist types choose to ignore the entirely real and tangible absence of an incentive for bosses to trickle down the blessings of time and freedom. The owners of this tech are the Gilded Age robber barons 2.0. And just as 18th century factory owners brought us such benefits as child labor, 16hr days, black lung, etc. while displacing artisans of all stripes, so will AI. The idea that any boss would let you daydream big concepts 7 hours a day because your 8 hours of deliverables got done in 1 is preposterous. They will pile 700% more on (as you say) or simply liquidate staff altogether. The joke on them, however, is that the clients will do the same to their agency. Chris Do has made a successful career out of sheer force of will, but he’s foolish to think he’s any more immune than the rest of us. And with Adobe going full steam ahead to decimate the pro market in favor of an exponentially larger consumer/hobbyist model, shit is gonna get real nuts real quick.

I'm so glad we're hip graphic designers my dude 🙌 just found this channel, fucking brilliant

You've got some very good points. The tech bros crypto fanatic mentality that has come with this is what we dont need. AI is not going to let us have more free time to do whathever we want. No, it's going to make us work more with less money since everyone will expect you to use these tools to be more "productive". On the other hand though, based on my own practice, there can be a craft in using such tools. It is def not the majority, but a small minority of creatives use such tools as a craft, dwelling in how it works and creating things that wouldnt have been possible before. I really like the term synthography because I feel it makes this clear distinction between AI artist and someone who uses such tools to create something meaningful and intentional.. Besides that, I'm happy to see your opinion on this, as I remember you from your talk at UNIBZ years ago, which really inspired me to do my own work!

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

Killer. Thanks for taking the time to write.

I’ve been in game dev for 20 years. The tools keep getting better but the work keeps growing. Ai tools are no different, it will not save us time but it will steal the actual fun stuff and convert us into meter readers and lever minders. Also- there’s already too much content. Imagine in a few years/months when you can push a button in macOS to make a game/ song/ movie for you. Humans will have no shared narrative, everyone will be in bubbles swimming in their own pools of mediocre shit, with just enough dopamine to make it irresistible.

This is just going to accelerate the homogenization of art. “AI” as people understand it is nothing more than fancy linear algebra and statistics. It is as good as what you put into it. If everyone becomes a proompter, there will be nothing new to train the AI on. As people use it more and reinforce certain results, stuff will start looking more of the same. Eventually we will just reach a sort of singularity where everything looks exactly the same. That will be a hell that we have created for ourselves. This is being driven by our insatiable obsession with technique and efficiency. Companies will buy into it to save money because they don’t understand art anyway. It’s cheaper to tell stacy from HR to watch 10 minute tutorials on proompting than to hire a full time GD.

The only solution i see is owning the end product while not realistic on a big scale this is where a small circle of traditionalists will prevail.

This cycle happens repeatedly in human history, where new tools come along that make previous trades obsolete. Artists have been largely spared from this because the nature of art was so difficult to automate. The only counter to this is to increase the general public's education (actually having people understand the value of the craft of art, but I am 100% black pilled this is not the direction humanity will go, because it's too counter to human nature..) AI entering into the arts is different than other industries being automated because, well if you are an aesthetic-ist, art is a type of spirituality for you and we believe art is an interface with God or the sublime etc, but all the ease of access to technology and VR and unlimited content, it will be a battle for the human spirit. I really see no alternative, this will permeate every aspect of our lives where there will still be /TRAD/ art, but what if someone makes it with a prosthetic? What if that prosthetic can increase someone's speed of output? Is it still trad? These are the divides that are going to happen (across the arts (not even considering about general white collar skills)), and there will be a type of Luddite cult that will refuse all advancements, and there will be people that see the inevitability and "how can you say no bro, it will double your gains?"... the only reason you can have to say no is if you believe hand crafted work is a direct link to the human soul...

@Finn-pe7uj

10 ай бұрын

Novelty, personal story and authenticity will keep /trad/ alive. Collectors will always prefer a 300 year old tribal mask or their daughter's potato print art over the same work produced by a CNC machine.

@mesolithicman164

2 ай бұрын

There is something very artificial about the material AI creates. And I think that creates a separation of usage. An artist with a strong conception of something and a specific way of rendering his ideas is more powerful and appealing to me than some kind of computerised, slick but vanilla output from an AI portal. I hope I'm not being Pollyanna-ish about this, but it does feel like there's a qualitative difference there. And that's a glint of hope.

strikes me as naive when anyone thinks just because a new tech is useful that it is only good & wouldn’t have any future consequences

The problem with AI art is that 95% of people are ok with “good enough” for free instead quality for $$$

AI is just another step forward in a long line of technologies that came along with moving design out of the hand and onto a computer, or really, any media that has the capacity for copy-paste. Clip art CDs to free fonts and photos, every web cms, Canva/PS Express has removed layer after layer of skill, vision and expertise for ‘good enough.’ Anything without scarcity has no cash value. AI simply makes it so that not even the receptionist who ‘likes doing that creative stuff’ has to make a copy themself. I include the precarious intern class and offshoring as technology, however the ‘copy’ here is metaphorical… the faceless commodity of interchangeable human assets act as copies in the assembly line

the battle of the big wacky glasses

great take

i'm glad i ditched graphic design in '99 and got myself a few building trades instead, when a computor can plaster and tile a bathroom then i'll be worried. #get_a_trade if only to fall back on

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

Crazy. Smart.

Thanks!

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

Yo! Sincere thanks for taking your hard earned cash and contributing to the channel. I appreciate it (sincerely)

Elliott, you like to move away from the camera a lot when making these videos -- and that makes them dynamic. Ever consider getting a lapel mic? I think it would add to the quality. It really ruins the magic when your voice falls off away from the camera. We both know details matter and this is a major detail in this medium you're using.

I think with everything, there’s both an upside and a downside obviously and I think the amount of choice this tool gives would be absolutely too much for me. I’m nowhere near the standard of a graphic designer but coming from a painter background and having makeshift knowledge of graphic design tools I find it overwhelming! I’m planning to learn more but surely I’ll gravitate to certain tools. Do we all need to know everything?! Love your videos. The time argument drives me mad, we are all trying to escape time and all it does is speed it up!

Isn't a director in some ways a prompter, for example let's say one is directing a movie: they are prompting each scene. Would you have an issue with AI if it becomes sufficient enough quality to replace the other people in the set? An AI which allows anyone to be a director. Obviously this seems very sad for us since it is removing a lot of the human components, but in this case would the merits and creativity of the director be the same?

@notyourordinarygamer1356

6 ай бұрын

You are talking about graphic design so this could be somewhat different, however if I am not mistaken there are cases where there is one person leading the graphic design work (and often taking most of the credit), while other people execute their commands.

It can be put much more simply. My father used to sit with his editor at the cutting table, cutting 16 mm films, a very time-consuming process, cue forward a few decades (leave out the horrid vhs period) and you get these amazing digital tools. Did he, or did I (as a designer), get more free time because of this technological progress? No. The work will be devaluated and so you end up doing as much, and often more work to nearly earn the same as you did before.

I would argue that the thesis from a lot of people, artists, society, that "AI is so far advanced, why bother with that work?" is rudimentary in its positioning. This conflation of intelligence (what they believe AI is) and formulaic computing is doing nothing but prompting in itself an argument by the people who don't use the tools of making. Art can only be art because its an immediate reflection on synapses built and bred on experience, emotion, logic, illogic, language. A computer, a program, can only do what we tell it to do - and we can't tell it to be us, me, you, or sentient. AI is a misnomer, it's math using language we recognize.

I can foresee the AI tool will only add more work to a workflow since the client will demand more for less. Clients may just purchase a subscription to an Art director AI to handle their needs. The artist will be reduced creatively since its no longer a learning discovery process. Art exploration will be reduced to exchange of words for images. The dullness of prompting will kill the will for an Artist to create and psychological burnout will take over. I experienced life before the internet and lived during home computing and I see it as a way for Capitalism to exploit tech and humans for efficiency of less time to make more money. Artists need money to live but at what costs? The genie is out and we have Hans Ruedi Giger to thank for giving us insight into a dark future!?!

A prompting class is literally just an art history/analysis class. You develop the language to describe an image in its historical style, its composition, lighting, materials used, etc. Any time you are learning to describe a picture with language you are learning to proompt. I've observed people with no particular art education trying to write prompts, and they really don't know what to ask for, and especially don't know how to discern from among the images which ones are impressive-but-cliche, and which ones offer something surprising and compelling.

Thanks

@StudioPractice1

Ай бұрын

Yo. Sincere thanks for the kind support!🙏🙏

This ends the same way web design has, everyone with a laptop and and wifi will become a "graphic designer" the same way everyone became a "web designer" with places like square space. Places like promptbase and other marketplaces will monetize prompts to get a particular look and that'll be it.

Is art that can be easily replaced by an algorithm even worth saving?

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

Not at this point

@oldtools6089

10 ай бұрын

@@StudioPractice1 only to the cloud. I reserve my local storage for the porn I really should have deleted.

What do you think famous graphic designers e.g Milton Glaser, Paul Rand, Andy Warhol would think of this stuff?

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

I’m not sure. But my gut reaction is that they would hate it

so true.

A.I. won't save you time-it will just increase your output. Just like computers did after typesetting. There won't be graphic designers or web developers or photographers, only individual "Creative Directors" who use an AI-assistants to complete whatever graphics, videos, or logos a brand needs.

@nealpeterson

10 ай бұрын

PS: Thanks for covering this topic.

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

You’re welcome. I think this whole thing will drive a “return of the real.” The value of that which is real will go up… although the market for it will shrink.

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

I should say, in my opinion

@oldtools6089

10 ай бұрын

I was really hoping that there might be a trend akin to the gourmet free-range farm-to-table sensibility held by neurotic narcissists, but would you rather eat something mushed into a bag by some snot-nosed human competing with AI, or have your meal sterilized, made to order without regard for your fastidious requirements and guaranteed by Amazon in a fraction of the time for a fraction of the cost?

@nealpeterson

10 ай бұрын

fair enough @@oldtools6089

We provide the AI with prompts and they create the end product. But, in reality, the inverse is true: these tools work best as a prompt for our creations. In my experience, we can feed in ideas and images, and the AI can help to introduce new elements or to broaden the idea. It's a tool, like the printing press or the camera obscura.

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

Let’s hope thats how it works

@aaronwinters916

10 ай бұрын

A creative brief is a prompt. Why would any client relay their own language to a designer to either a) do data entry and/or b) misinterpret it? Especially when there is zero risk or investment in tweaking their own language to produce another result within seconds?

Chris Do has the Madison Ave. speak down pat. I doubt he even believes what he's saying.

@StudioPractice1

2 ай бұрын

Ha

I was listening to a podcast talk about how Christopher Nolan sometimes uses dialogue as part of the soundscape and will intentionally mix it below the music in a scene. I like to think of AI as a tool that can assist in similar ways. We will soon see a new form of art that gets closer to and closer to a pure concept, likely mixed media. Nintendo is a competitor to Xbox and Sony not because of superior hardware but because of deliberate art direction/identity. I love your videos and think you have a very rare and perceptive mind.

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

I really appreciate your kind words. Thanks for writing!

Is that your home studio or part of the Cranbook academy?

People keep on saying we will have more free time... It's called being unemployed, and free time with no money is not fun!

We are encountering new ways to shed responsibility. There will always be a market for ethically-sourced human care & attention. How much outsourcing is too much?

I find the prospect of prompting as a skill set completely mundane. The whole AI conversation is embalmed in this milquetoast postulating towards some vague sense of convenience. What I find terrifying is how easily people are ok with giving up a fundamental component of art and image making. I’m reminded of one of your early episodes “the other 40 hours” where you talk about the artist and designer needing to be committed to putting in the work in order to make it. Why do you think it is that in all this talk of AI, the idea of no longer being the one to craft the art object is never anywhere on anyone’s mind.? We save 40 hours to… ‘think’ more? What does that mean? To me, those 40 hours are a kind of thought you can’t do any other way.

The question is: Is it easier to prompt to get what you envision than to simply make it yourself. A picture is worth 1000 words

@foljs5858

10 ай бұрын

It's not about realizing your vision faster or not. Those paying for graphic design don't care for any "vision". They might pressure a designer to get their idea "right" but that's only because they're paying a human and want to feel they're getting their money's worth. When they can get something out just from AI, it wont be about vision anymore. It will just be all about it being cheaper, and they will settle on one of the variations the AI can give them, as opposed to be fussy about some exact idea.

It's honestly over, you're gonna have to prompt no matter if you like it or not it can generate several close to finished images every 10 seconds, finished enough that your CEO isn't going to care about the hands or whatever stuff you think is important. Even worse, he's going to lean over your shoulder and add "4K, 8K, ultra high detail, trending on tiktok, masterpiece" to your prompt. Doesn't matter if you have what you consider a unique style, it can be cloned from 8 images in 45 minutes and then accelerate the same as any other style from the model. Artists are right to be scared.

@tylersdadx

10 ай бұрын

real 🥲

There will not be any "prompter" jobs in graphic design and I will prove it to you. Data collection is king. Just imagine for a moment how many millions of hours Adobe collects from it's user base for graphic design across its suite of design software. Endless hours of human beings designing everything from ads to logos to editorial layout. Every mouse click, every button push, every method and technique, all of that data.... flowing right to Adobe. Now all that data can be refined into extremely powerful machine learning data sets. No, there will NOT be any "prompter" jobs. Nonsense. Machine learning generative AI will completely take over the majority of graphic design jobs across the board.

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

That's my fear. It's impossible to know the future. But look how the writers guild of America are reacting and then think of the deafening silence from most designers

@notable_tulip2128

10 ай бұрын

I think designers/artists are silent because they're worried about appearing like luddites, or that if they don't adapt, other designers with UX KZread channels will blow past them in a rocket ship. Maybe they will, but I don't want to be one of millions of "artists" trying to hustle $50 design jobs like Fiverr

@spitfirekryloff744

10 ай бұрын

@@notable_tulip2128 Well if I look at the vfx industry and its artists, there's no strike because there's no union. But you probably have a point with competitors overtaking them if they don't adapt, union or not it could happen

Where can I buy some of that Celconge ?😂 However on a serious note though, I believe that these AI art generators will cause more clients to demand more for less money.

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

Duh, huh? What’s Celconge?

@azammohammed9567

10 ай бұрын

​@@StudioPractice1The Proompter animation spelled 'Cologne' wrong.

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

@@azammohammed9567 Thanks for pointing it out. I'll take it up with Artificial Intelligence. The speech to text engine and Photoshop Beta.😀

4:25 This time-saving argument has got to be the dumbest take I've ever heard, especially from someone with his level of experience and skill. He should know that the introduction of the home computer promised the end of paper and a 4 day work week for white collar jobs. NONE of the advancements the last few decades in conventional computer hardware and software have resulted in a less demanding workflow. NONE. It's the opposite. You're expected to accomplish way more in the same -or less time. Designers and Creatives today are also expected to be multidisciplinary every-men when it comes their skill range. AI will only make this worse. (yet again) EDIT: 5:42 FFS he just shot down his previous argument entirely🤦‍♀

We need to shame proompters out of society

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

I’m doing my part. Lol

I don't understand what there is to learn about prompting, unless maybe you don't speak or write language yet...

It is very true what many leaders in the industry are saying: AI will give humans more free time to be creative and this should be a great thing if you are a creative person. Unfortunately this will give otherwise occupied or peripherally interested employees more time as well, which inevitably WILL turn to reducing costs that include if not outright focus on artists (ai-prompt-assistants). I wonder how creative they're gonna get asking why they need that at all.

@romchompa6858

10 ай бұрын

It's more likely that uncreative people will now see themselves as creative, yet all they did was type a bunch of word salad

my main concern is that with all this technology we will lost connection wth how things look irl and all that we see online, i mean a lot of us remember internet pre hd and how everything was honest and now everything moving towards strange rails.

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

The return of the real... hopefully this will underscore the importance of that which is REAL

My comment is that we are moving towards a big explosion of abundance in terms of content. Anybody will be able to create anything, thus it will be rendered useless. This is something you can already see with social media where people tend to doomscroll. As a zombie they are wasting their time just scrolling through near infinite amounts of content. With AI it actually could be infinite amount of content. This means that how crazy/scary/sexy/cool/whatever you can imagine you can see. Thus (as Plato separates the ideas and forms) I think (or WISH) that a new form of appreciation of the idea aka the concept will emerge. WHY is something designed like this? WHAT is the creator trying to say? WHY those tools/colours/shapes/strokes/composition/etc. etc. If you want to see more about my opinion you can better DM me, I have some presentations regarding this subject if you are interested.

@icarumba5

10 ай бұрын

The human brain needs exercise to expand itself. Artist learn to be better at art by processing an image inside their head first before seeking crutches via prompting. AI art is just regurgitation of human art into an amalgamation.

@mister-monkeyman

10 ай бұрын

@@icarumba5 all human art is a compilation. That’s not bad, it’s what makes us human. But AI is just superficial: all skin and no soul. If the latter is ever achieved we should deem AI to be human.

@icarumba5

10 ай бұрын

@@mister-monkeyman My human response: Humans are copies of copies but our minds have a unique perspective of the environment through interpretation. I think your response is too simple of explaining the creative process. I doubt art itself will continue to be a genuine human expression and will lead to a simplifying task that becomes less of meaningful. Less significant things become less interesting. The process is what makes it as in a journey has more value than the destination. I can take a short cut and its expected? Why? Its because we convince ourselves that is what the employer wants. Its less of a tool and more of a handicap. I wrote this before prompting a ChatGtP response: The argument presented in the statement is that all human art is a compilation, and this quality is what makes us human. However, it contrasts human art with AI, suggesting that AI is superficial and lacks depth or soul. The statement concludes that if AI were to achieve a level of depth or soul similar to human art, it should be considered human. Possible responses to this argument could include: 1. **Agreeing with the Statement:** One could agree with the argument and assert that human art often reflects complex emotions, experiences, and cultural influences, which are a part of what makes us human. AI, in its current form, lacks these intrinsic qualities and is primarily a compilation of data and algorithms. If AI were to develop genuine creativity, emotions, and depth in its art, it would indeed be a significant achievement. 2. **Disagreeing with the Statement:** Some may argue that the statement oversimplifies both human art and AI. They might point out that human art can vary widely in terms of depth, and not all of it is necessarily a compilation; some works of art may be deeply personal and introspective. Furthermore, AI can already generate creative and compelling art, blurring the line between human and artificial creation without necessarily achieving a "soul" in the human sense. 3. **Questioning the Premise:** Others might question the premise that AI lacks depth or soul entirely. They could argue that AI can generate art that resonates with people emotionally, even if it does not have consciousness or emotions in the same way humans do. The idea of what constitutes a "soul" in AI is a complex philosophical question. 4. **Highlighting the Need for Ethical Consideration:** Some may argue that the question of deeming AI to be human raises important ethical and philosophical dilemmas. It could lead to discussions about the rights and responsibilities associated with AI entities if they were considered human. This response would suggest that the question goes beyond the realm of art and into broader societal implications. In any case, the response to the statement largely depends on one's perspective on the nature of art, AI, and what it means to be human, making it a topic open to various interpretations and discussions.

Oh my God it’s the real spills now I feel like if I call you sir you’ll just tell me I’m not sir that’s my dad is it seems like you wanted a Pepsi no one has brought to you, but if they sound crazy, then you sound crazy to them as to discredit another persons art form because it is not your preferred medium is essentially discrediting the man in the mirror, because what if I seen your institutions a your ideals, and what if you were the crazy one who sounds dumb I’m not calling names, but I’m just trying to explain why they have such cryptic messages. I think it’s how you sound to them because a I art is actually really art I swear to you when done correctly as a graphic designer for the last 10 damn years, who has been all around the town, I would not go that way, as it appears to be the opposite direction of humanities all of them

Id be pro ai if they didnt shit out the most mediocre stock image type content ever. Cant surpass its training data i guess

What did they tell all of those coal miners when they were losing their jobs? Oh yeah, LEARN TO CODE! The Screen Writers Guild should go back to their old name, The Film Actors Guild! Don’t you hate it when technology replaces your ass?!

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

You’re not paying attention (are you) lol. Coding is one of the industries MOST at risk… Learn to weld homie.

@vincentleeadams

10 ай бұрын

@@StudioPractice1 I know! “Irony can be pretty ironic!” -William Shatner.

Disappointed with these mad boomer takes. Art isn’t about talent or skill per se, but instead the artist themselves. Artists are the visionaries of society, they seek to dive into the abyss and return with hidden treasures. If AI better enables their ability to experiment and explore, that’s where the value will lie. The imagination of the individual, not the pool they draw from. Anyone can proompt, but good taste is still required for meaningful results.

@massissues

10 ай бұрын

yea but they just dont get it. this guy is basically peeing himself of anger. also what is at stake here is the fact that anyone will be able to create their own concept art. good or bad doesn't matter. its a no brainer. imagine kinds with disabilities, children without hands etc.. ppl who cant hold a pen for some reason.. who tf is poor man trying to create a case for anything. he seems to have zero creativity of his own. not a single original art-piece in his room. just bleak copies of other stuff he has seen. and that is a fact. no wonder he is furious.

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

Hey doomer, I’m not a boomer I’m Gen X… you’d know that if you’d put down the pipe.

@TheJakealope

10 ай бұрын

@@StudioPractice1 I apologize for the ad hominem. The attitude of your video is close minded and rooted in basic Luddite thinking. Intelligence isn’t rooted in hard facts, anyone can memorize. It’s rooted in flexibility.

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

it's all in good fun . Frankly, one can never tell what the intent behind comments are... as you know tone is hard to "hear" via text. I can't tell if I'm being trolled errr whatever. It's all in good fun tho... no foul... one love.

the amount of cope in this video is astonishing. some people are obviously not mentally ready for this digital evolution. since nobody is trying to force you to stop making your own art then the only purpose of this video must be to protect some kind of monetary income. the point of the video where you point to the text you've written and claiming the "work of the hand has some kind of logic to it" is laughable. its all in the eye of the beholder. tbh i dont think you love art, you just love yourself. god bless your lost frightened soul, and remember, painters were just as scared when the camera was getting popular.

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

Spit take… (needless to say I do “love” myself). “The amount of ‘cope’ in this video”? “Cap?” or “cope?” Either way. Look anyone with a KZread channel has a component of their personality that is detached from reality, and is unwell. I’ll gladly cop to that. Ya got me there. With regard to. THE ACTUAL POINT OF THE VIDEO: you’re lost homie. Pull yer head outta yer A$$

@massissues

10 ай бұрын

@@StudioPractice1 oh im lost huh? during the entire rant you are acting as art is some how lost just bc AI image models are here. nothing is EVER lost. everything is a forward movement in space and time. get in the game and stop fighting windmills.

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

I’m not fighting windmills. You have any idea what the Screen Writers Guild is up to? Yo… watch a few of my other videos. I’m “frightened?” I’m “scared?” LOLZ … I’m frightened of *other things, just like any normal human. But - in general - I ain’t scared, and this kind of shit I DEFINITELY am not “scared” of. It’s a KZread channel, I could sit around on my ass doing nothing, or I could publish some videos. Now, you did hit on at least one idea that I’ll agree with. This “must be to protect some kind of monetary income.” That’s correct. That’s PRECISELY it. Because you see, I’m not having any of this starving artist shit. That’s for fools and suckers. We live in a capitalist system, designers should be compensated handsomely for their ideas and labor. This ain’t a hobby. Fuq dat.

@sylvestreb1302

10 ай бұрын

@@StudioPractice1 Then maybe the problem is the capitalist system, not the AI ?!

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

Maybe. What’s the alternative?

Yea, and as we get more time back it will just be loaded with more work not extra creativity but production in relation to maximizing profit and exploitation 🤫 It’s nothing new…the only new part is this advancement will replace so many so called designers. Clients won’t hire them since they will be able to prompt the machines themselves!? Why isn’t anyone seeing this???🫠

I’ve been in game dev for 20 years. The tools keep getting better but the work keeps growing. Ai tools are no different, it will not save us time but it will steal the actual fun stuff and convert us into meter readers and lever minders. Also- there’s already too much content. Imagine in a few years/months when you can push a button in macOS to make a game/ song/ movie for you. Humans will have no shared narrative, everyone will be in bubbles swimming in their own pools of mediocre shit, with just enough dopamine to make it irresistible.

@StudioPractice1

Ай бұрын

Agreed