Wider seats in concept always morph into more seats in production.

@camf7522

Жыл бұрын

Agreed, airlines always ruin manufacturer’s space for passenger concepts, for higher density and revenue.

@patthewoodboy

Жыл бұрын

correct

@jamescapaldi6362

Жыл бұрын

​

@RossPayne

Жыл бұрын

Truer words never spoken.

@bobdonovan34

Жыл бұрын

The seats don't even line up with the windows anymore.

I love watching these videos and counting all the errors.

@thebutterman6035

Жыл бұрын

Like all the fake “concepts” in the intro?

@ahmetadam-fe9vm

3 ай бұрын

​@@thebutterman6035no there are some regular mistakes like overture top speed is 1.6 mach and she said slightly over mach 2

Somehow, no matter how large the airframe, I still get the feeling that passengers will still be packed into airplanes like cattle. So much for passenger "comfort".

@wolfschwarzmond

Жыл бұрын

Yup. I worked for Boeing, the seat locations/spacing were an Airline determined item. Didn't matter what size airframe they wanted the max number of seats the FAA would let them get away with.

@hendrsb33

Жыл бұрын

@@wolfschwarzmond I say that as a tall man with long legs. If I fly long distance, I'm resigned to paying extra for extra leg room to make the flight bearable.

@racketman2u

Жыл бұрын

and our checked baggage will still end up in Frankfurt, no matter where we are bound.

Rolls-Royce pulled out of the Boom project quite some time ago

@Deltaflot1701

Жыл бұрын

That is very true, but they did manage to get a couple of other lesser known companies to start developing the necessary super cruise engines. interesting how this video only came out days ago, but has info that is a year + out of date.

just do not treat us as cattle, give us room to move, breathe.

Don’t think the French would be impressed with it being referred to as the Anglo Concorde.

@lamiche89

Жыл бұрын

Indeed they almost lost me there 🇫🇷

@basilpunton5702

Жыл бұрын

But it did provide a laugh at one of the errors.

@robinharwood5044

Жыл бұрын

Especially since the French put so much effort into the project in order to get hold of advanced British technology.

@orlandonelthorpe9027

Жыл бұрын

Well considering that the plane was actually devised by the UK, and they went to the French to aid with funding (the US was not interested as it was developing a similar jet of its own), the Concorde was really 'Anglo'. The French, in my view, got disproportionate kudos for the plane.

@PureMatteo

Жыл бұрын

​@@orlandonelthorpe9027 The fact a country reaches out and a treaty is made doesn't make the plane more of the first country than of the second. Most of the engines and power + supersonic experience came from the british from obvious similar planes (the french had fast planes, but not with the kind of wings that would work in supercruise, notably the Avro). The brits started from the avro and starfighter experience. Long story short they ended up with a project but were lacking in several key areas, reaching out to sud aviation, Nord and.. dassault which is not unfamiliar with supersonic endeavours. All 3 made a design of their own that merged with the brits early design. The "super caravelle" design from Sud Aviation won the competition, for being pretty close to the british design. Both parties agreed on everything for the design except for size and range, but they quickly agreed on making 2 variants (one with bigger fuselage and 6 engines for improved range). The name "concorde" was chosen for its meaning, similar to "union/harmony" between the two teams. A lot of the engine work was indeed english, a lot of the fuselage work was french, the wing itself mostly english because of the original design although in cooperation with sud aviation. Construction was 50/50. It all led to Airbus Industries. It's pretty safe to say it's overall a 50/50 project.

Given the current design of airports it will be hard to completely redesign aircraft if they are unable to fit into the gates. I think airplanes will remain fairly close to current designs but the biggest modifications will be more aerodynamic wings and more fuel efficient engines. Ideally if engines could use biofuels that were cheaper to source (and cleaner) I think that would make a huge impact on air travel.

@user-gl1kq8tx5k

Жыл бұрын

Biofuels at altitude...pfft

@jonsant7232

Жыл бұрын

Totally agree with you that airports all around the world had to make costly alterations to accept the A380 it would crazy to redesign the world's airports for one type of Aircraft as for biofuels I have no idea but never say never

@avand2794

Жыл бұрын

On a small scale biofuels are sustainable, but on a large scale they aren't, unless we start growing plant artificially in very efficiently spaced buildings or whatever, which I don't see happening as that is very expensive for a product which is produced in a very inefficient manner...

@avand2794

Жыл бұрын

You might ask then, what are you going to fuel aircraft then? That is what engineers are looking for now (biofuels are still being researched also) but it's probably going to be hydrogen, or perhaps some kind of nuclear propulsion.

@aspmusic5904

Жыл бұрын

If your airports concern is due to the V-shaped planes, then as long as the wingspan of those V-shaped planes does not exceed that of the widest incumbent plane, then all good.

great video ! I can't wait to try these beautiful birds 🙂

A380 is love by the public

@adrianbriggs2763

Жыл бұрын

Funny now that we are post pandemic, how many airlines have returned their A380's back to the fleets asap. Who wants to fly on a crappy dreamliner (dimming windows my ass) or the biggest of them all the A380. The 777x is soooooo late, Boeing will be paying millions back in lost revenue to the airlines it will not make much money for years to come.

When they start building space airliners, planes that take off like normal planes and then enter space, taking about an hour to travel around the world, then I'll take notice.

"As the economy gets better" honestly seems like more wishful thinking than Burt Rutan's wildest fever dreams.

Surprised there’s no mention of the truss brace wing design

A-220 is THE BOMBARDIER CS300 A CANADIAN PLANE, WE WILL NEVER FORGET

WEF goal of net zero will kill all of them , unless the people tell the WEF to do one 🙂

Let me remind you that the Concord is a collaboration between France and the UK and was never matched.

@alexrebmann1253

Жыл бұрын

My father inlaw worked on the Boeing 2707. Was a good thing that they stopped in favor of the 747. While it was great the Concord was a financial disaster.

@lucrolland7489

Жыл бұрын

@@alexrebmann1253 At the time when the Concord was imagined followed by the 2707, the business plan was fine. Then came two problems: the first is that the Concord was not allowed fly over USA and this killed the chance for it to service Montreal. Then came the OPEC and the petrol crisis in 1973.

who woulda thought that MIT engineers would model their futuristic plane shape after the Flying V guitar!

The A220 is designed and built by Bombardier. Airbus only owns it now because of Bombardiers ineptness.

@cameronballantyne1149

Жыл бұрын

or Boeing's greed!

@c.san.8751

Жыл бұрын

@@cameronballantyne1149 Ugh. Greed or the drive for profit and trying to protect market share. Why is that such a problem?

@foxlake6750

Жыл бұрын

Bombardier was trying to develop the Lear 85 (composite), a new Global and the Cseries at the same time, which financially crippled them. Really dumb. So, they ended the Lear 85 and gave away the Cseries, sold Shorts, closed Lear, sold Dehavilland, sold the regional jet division and hung on to the higher margin business jet business……

@c.san.8751

Жыл бұрын

@@foxlake6750 Bombardier is one of the worst run companies on the planet. I am very familiar with this company.

@patrice5976

7 ай бұрын

Nothing inept about Bombardier

3:38, the prospect of short Trans-Atlantic flights! I can see the marketing now: "OceanAir - we get you nearly there!"

You say the Anglo Concord at a moment ; You meant Anglo-French Concord I suppose…

Lol. If any of them go into production. Skip this video.

I would like to see a new Burnelli!

Boom “recently announced a collaboration” with Rolls-Royce? That was three years ago. It has already failed. And a 777 image that’s backwards? Hard to take anything seriously in this video.

Lol, I like the comparison. Henceforth the TU Delft shall be known as: "The Dutch MIT"...

These are great, but what did they decide for the new air force one?

Bigger planes will have folding wing tips like the 777X

@abdullasiyam721

Жыл бұрын

They only exist to allow the 777X to fit into Code E gates (the minimum that today's 2nd generation 777s use).They have no purpose other than that.

nice!

நல்ல தகவல் 👍👍

Supersonic passengerliners should be the gold standard in future air travel. It will be expensive at first, but should be more affordable and competitive when other airline companies add them to their fleets.

@hanskaesbohrer2809

Жыл бұрын

The Concorde was a failure for some reasons. Also clima change is real and there is no point in (fuel guzzling and super high emissions) supersonic airtravel in our times for a few people, thats why the Boom won´t be a success, in my view. The aerospace industry has to adapt, not with the old supersonic concept of the 50`and 60`s ofg the last century, but with single aisle long-haul planes like the Airbus A321 XL and the A220-500: That means less weight, less full consumption and less emissions before we have other concepts available like the V shaped planes. And I wonder - where is Boeing in this segment, are they sleeping? I really do see no point in old supersonic concepts in 2030!

@toffonardi7037

Жыл бұрын

@@hanskaesbohrer2809 Boeing maybe will not exist anymore in 20 years from now...

@haakonht

11 ай бұрын

If we're in the land of dreams I'd rather have a teleportation device.

@wvt5825

11 ай бұрын

@@haakonht I watched "The Fly" and familiar with the idea of teleportation devices. I'm good being human and not some fuzed creature😆

Somehow, I just don’t see me on an aircraft made by a company who’s name is BOOM.

Rolls Royce pulled out of the Boom Partnership

Didn’t RR pull out if doing the engines??

When the airlines have “NO BABIES/KIDS ALLOWED” flights (or at least a “baby/kid” section with a THICK WALL BETWEEN THE SECTIONS, then I’ll buy a ticket, OTHERWISE I’m sticking to PRIVATE JET FLIGHTS. Guaranteed!

Cool

Sure, sure, sure. I remember when the Concorde debuted. THAT was going to revolutionize air travel too! Around the world in 18 minutes! Champagne and caviar for economy class! Turns out it was too expensive for anyone to fly on except the very rich, and was finally scrapped because too many people complained about the sonic boom. So dream all you want, but the average person isn’t going to get within a country MILE of these planes even IF they come to pass.

Flying V looks like a pain to take off and land.

The A220-500 is a great dream. I've enjoyed working the CSeries to the A220 program. It's a hell of an aircraft and I'm going to miss working on it at the end of the year

@nopenonein

Жыл бұрын

@Timothy Harrison Is it viable or even feasible for CFM Leap to offer an alternative engine for the A220 and E2 series planes? As we know P&W has engine supply issues.

@salehwahib3749

5 ай бұрын

Where is Airbus A321 XLR made

Are these scripts written and delivered by chatGPT?

I like how it starts all futuristic - a Flying V, Boom - then right to the A220. Haha. No plane is going to change the way we fly - but perhaps Boom might have a seat in our destination planning. Time is the killer. Ultimetly, we still have to deal with airports - that will never change. What accent does this narrator have?? With her "plethora of passenger-pleasing.ammenities."

Other than the flying wing planes, the other aircraft can already take advantage of the new technology the new aircraft will bring. Such as putting on the newer engines on the older models, making the older models more fuel efficient and faster. Or stretching some of the current models such as the 737, 757 and so on. Same with the current Airbus aircraft. As for the 747's, they are already no longer in production. The last 747 rolled off the production line on Dec. 7. So wasn't no point in even mentioning them. But if you are going to mention the 747's, then you might as well mention the DC-10 that are still in use though not in passenger service.

@JDAbelRN

Жыл бұрын

Nor is Airbus 380 still in production.

@apveening

Жыл бұрын

Stretching 737 has already been overdone past the breaking point.

@everybuddy5924

Жыл бұрын

@@apveening It can still be stretched until you just have a single row of seats in the plane Who would care if the plane ended up 2500 ft long, as long as it flies.

@Kwint.

9 ай бұрын

Ive flown dc10 two years ago

Planes nowadays are usually slower than they were before

@arjunsavanur7242

Жыл бұрын

The faster you go, more fuel you burn

@user-gl1kq8tx5k

Жыл бұрын

​@@arjunsavanur7242 Who cares?....I want to get there....FAST!

@arjunsavanur7242

Жыл бұрын

@@user-gl1kq8tx5k Pay double money for fuel and wear and also pay more tax 😂

Well fighter jets have engine in the back... so did the old commercial airplanes in some companies in the past and they somehow feature more in air crash investigation...

New mc-21 is the best plane on airline manager 4

Odd that this was posted 10 days ago but talks about a plane coming into service in 2022. But okay. I liked it anyway.

A220-500 is gonna be the real game changer when it comes out. Like a smaller 757 but for it’s class. Similar to 757 vs 767/A300 back in the day. I’ve said it many times but I would absolutely not mind a transcon or international flight on the A220. One mid-cabin lav on a stretched -500 would make it huge for airlines.

@NikanDragosysSerpenDra

Жыл бұрын

uhm no thats what the A321 XWLR NeoCX is gonna be for, long haul 757 style and 767's? FOr reeL/ they've been replaced with A300 A310 A330's neeed I go on?

@cameron.t

Жыл бұрын

@@NikanDragosysSerpenDra You edited your comment and I still can’t understand it. The 757 opened up transcon/overseas flights for carriers that didn’t want to use a 767 or didn’t have them. The A220-500 would do the same for carriers that don’t want use a NEOLR or don’t have them. I believe B6 is already planning to do this with the CS3. Frontier is struggling to fill their 321s. I imagine most budget carriers would. So a CS3 or A225 would be great for them. Long range for smaller capacity, with (in my opinion) great comfort. Cabin designed to be spacious at 2x3 and I believe they made it impossible for 3x3.

@bash102

Жыл бұрын

You’re comparing a potential A220-500 to a 757 😂😂😭

@cameron.t

Жыл бұрын

@@bash102 And you're not reading what I read just to use emojis. Other people have no problem understanding the tiered comparison I am making. 😂😂😭😂😂😭😂😂😭 Using emojis is pretty great, tho. 😂😂😭😂😂😭😂😂😭😂😂

@cleo5610

Жыл бұрын

​@bash102 .... because its purpose would be the same. it would open up more direct routes with less demand, just like the 757 did decades ago.

Some of these concepts remind me of the 1920s - 1950's Popular Science/Mechanics articles - interesting but not there and only in the minds of the 'inventors' . With that said, I do hope that some of these outside of the box ideas come to real life.

Where does this channel get data from. The 17in seat width only applies to one manufacturer.

Day is not far out when Airbus will own Boeing just like it owns Bombardier. At least the commercial aviation division. Boeing will be only left as a defense contractor like Lockheed Martin.

@timothyharrison8953

Жыл бұрын

Airbus does not own Bombardier, it just has the A220 aircraft (CSeries). It's business jets, the Global, and Challengers are still Bombardier.

@gsoutien1

Жыл бұрын

Spoken like a true ignorant. 🤣

The 777X is awesome, hope it gets in the air, soon.

@nzmarty

Жыл бұрын

It's been flying/testing for 2 years now kzread.info/dash/bejne/lJOa1dWamdisoLg.html

The Boom Overture may not become a reality now, but it would've catapulted the industry to newer, and exciting heights. We would only dream to see this airplane actually be built and enter service. It would've cost a fortune to continue this program. The fact that a sufficient Power Plant could not be found, it still would create a big problem of unfortunate proportions. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner is an amazing airplane that is doing quite well with airlines that need it primarily for long-haul, and also capacity. I am hoping for Boeing, to develop a 787 freighter version really soon. The 777-9X is an exciting new approach for higher capacity and long-haul. However, based on the Pandemic, and COVID 19 issues, the program was frozen for some time. Finally, and hopefully it will start service with the airlines soon. It's gonna be an airplane that will be loved by all crews, and passengers alike. The 777-8X will also become a big step for Boeing for an ultra-long-range airplane. The A350-900, and 1000 are also two great selling airplanes for Airbus. These are two great developments I see many more of being produced, and to also mention the A350-900 freighter version that is forthcoming.

@NikanDragosysSerpenDra

Жыл бұрын

it has hell of a performance the A359

@toffonardi7037

Жыл бұрын

I don't believe it will ever become reality

GENIAL

Boom engine info is out of date, they are no longer working with Rolls Royce. They are developing their own engine.

What does Covid have to do with getting rid of old planes?

In the states the TSA already changed the way I fly... I drive. lol.

Are 15 extra seats really a game changer? And wouldn't the A220-500 compete with Airbus' own A320NEO?

Rolls-Royce quit the Boom Supersonic project last year. Is the rest of this info similarly out of date?

Should I say none of these planes will be on the order books anytime soon.

I love your accent! Russian?

Wow, there are so many mistakes in here it's almost funny. Almost.

give me one that disallows airlines tampering with seating size and if it is a reasonable price then I might become enthusiastic (overseas). Not otherwise.

But how long will passengers be willing to seat on a narrow body plane? (Which has the same type of seats as a wide body plane 😂)

@michaelcavalier8750

Жыл бұрын

I care much more about the width of the seat than the width of the plane. Some planes that I have been on were so narrow that, on one side, there was only one seat. That was better than sitting next to someone.

@MANUbjx

Жыл бұрын

@@michaelcavalier8750 yeah, and some widebody planes are so densely packed, feeling more cramped than on a narrowbody jet.

No way I'm boarding [BOOM]

Interesting video !!!

MIT is the US version of Delft Technical University.

👍👍

a supersonic plane, to be launched in 2026? THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE. we are in 2023, and it should have been ready already... in testing phase... in order to start working in 2026..

One time I was looking at the sky and saw a contrail of a large plane. My flight tracking app said it was a 777x. They are already doing test flights of the type.

@appleintosh

Жыл бұрын

It flew for the first time in 2020

@drjojo4624

7 ай бұрын

Been flying for a while - what is more worrying is that it’s been flying for so long and still nowhere near certification.

I don't think the world is ready for another supersonic passenger plane.

@TheCaptain7190

Жыл бұрын

I think that as soon as the major plane manufacturers read your comment they will immediately stop all development of supersonic aircraft. Thank goodness for forward-thinking and perceptive people such as yourself.

@TheCaptain7190

Жыл бұрын

@@valleyofiron125 Stop taking life so seriously dude, Humour not your thing?

@TheCaptain7190

Жыл бұрын

@@valleyofiron125 You obviously don't do humour, sarcasm seems to go over your head too

2:21 Overture or ‘Over Time and Over budget’

walking is the future.

What about the a350?

Is this an old video being reposted, or has no research actually been done before creating and posting the video? There are so many errors.

i have not seen anything that excites my imagination. this is the same things i see in planes. if i saw a disc shaped plane flying ,,,that would catch my attention

I was just scrambled in a 787 with 9 narrow seats per row... So what is more comfortable... A narrow body with comfortable seats or a wide body with narrow seats? 😅

For over 70 years now the basic shape of passenger planes hasn't changed. Betcha it'll stay the same for the next 50 years.

Yep, 'in more comfort', of course

They should rename the Flying V into Flying Tin of Sardines. 314 passengers, but the plane is just the size of the Airbus 321.

Rolls Royce is not developing the engines for the Boom jet any longer - the pulled out quite some time ago already in an official statement. Why can´t you guys sort out the recent information before you put this little flix together?

The 777x had a huge engine mal function during a test flight, so imagine if Boeing put the aircraft in service on time😳😧😟

Will airlines replace A321XLR for old B757?

Correction - The Anglo-French Concorde - a collaboration of Sud Aviation and The British Aircraft Corporation

The word route is ‘root’ not ‘rowt’.

@dmitripogosian5084

Жыл бұрын

Depends where you live

The 777x wasn't introduced in 2022 - it's planned for 2025. I'm guessing that the dates that this video claims for introduction of these other planes are similarly optimistic.

@misterhoeflak

11 ай бұрын

The narrator rattled off a copy/paste script I suspect. Those dates you mention are - ironically - out of date, and Concorde was referred to as the 'Anglo Concorde' when it was in fact the 'Anglo-French Concorde'.

Would you say I have a plethora of piñatas.

Where is embraer?

🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀

The best ...Concorde ,flying at the F14 speed...without Tom cruise

Even tho i like the design of the BOOM but the name is a bit disturbing lol

All of this means more money for the airlines, higher prices and fewer amenities and higher luggage costs for passengers.

I feel like that first one is doomed by engine over body- the Soviets had a bomber that did that and it was AWFUL to fly and prone to accidents bc the thrust generated was OVER the body/wing rather than UNDER it. That is a problem. The ONE THING passengers care most about- MORE SPACE. Being crammed in like sardines in a tiny can is the BIGGEST gripe about flying.

Olá obrigada por compartilhar esse avião são os mais modernos e sensacional OK🌟🌷😁🇧🇷👍❤️

❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉

Sure, these planes you won't see for many decades. You don't get rid of the old planes, it takes many years to do so, if the airliner is still in business. No one hold your breath.

"On the bwight side..."

Yea the first one probably won’t even make it through production without failing 😂

Robot voice - goodbye

Flying long haul is a no go for me. Hyperloop please

Borat: How much ❔

So nothing changes with air travel. We’ll all still be crammed into a metal tube.

pen dam ic?

777x like sigma rule n.1