15 Never-Built Commercial Planes we nearly got

NEW CHANNEL:
• Launched from the bigg...
Discord: / discord
My News Channel: / @aviationstationyt
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @foundandexplained
Patreon:
/ foundandexplained
Chapters:
0:29 - Hawker-Siddeley HS141 (VTOL passenger jet)
1:10 - Lockheed L-500 (triple-decker cargo plane)
2:31 - Boeing 747X (Boeing's large cargo/passenger plane)
3:48 - McDonnell-Douglas MD-12 (their version of a jumbo jet)
4:43 - Lockheed-Martin Very Large Transport (really big cargo plane in a second video)
5:20 - Aerocon Dash 1.6 Wingship (big Ekranoplane)
6:03 - Boeing Sonic Cruiser (almost supersonic transport)
6:42 - Sukhoi KR-860 (large passenger plane with folding wings)
7:22 - FMA IA 36 Condor (engines inside the main hull)
8:16 - Saab 1073 (baby widebody plane)
9:00 - 728 Jet (50-100 passenger plane)
9:34 - Plane train (plane propulsion while riding on or hanging from rails)
10:03 - Boeing 7J7 (propfan planes, efficient but loud)
10:53 - Tupolev Tu-404 (It's big. Not not that big, bigger. Bigger than that!)
Chapters by @toddkes5890

Пікірлер: 597

  • @wormyboot
    @wormyboot Жыл бұрын

    Every time a cool idea dies because it was too loud, I yell "THEN MAKE IT A CARGO PLANE!"

  • @KnightRanger38

    @KnightRanger38

    Жыл бұрын

    Often the biggest issue is not the noise inside the plane - but the noise outside it.

  • @rolflandale2565

    @rolflandale2565

    Жыл бұрын

    Bombers had fantastic movie thriller debunk safety features. They were intended far more critical handling supply, so they are great for classic revive & approval, EVs & passengers services. With new ⛽ & 🔋mods.

  • @Reason077

    @Reason077

    Жыл бұрын

    Cargo planes still often need to fly into regular city airports, and many are very sensitive about noise. So the same noise regulations apply.

  • @markfox1545

    @markfox1545

    Жыл бұрын

    Really? Wow, that must be mildly embarrassing if you're in a supermarket or a meeting at work or at a funeral. I'm sorry you have this affliction.

  • @RadioMan2023

    @RadioMan2023

    Жыл бұрын

    @@markfox1545 Lmao

  • @amandanewport9483
    @amandanewport94833 ай бұрын

    8:16 the baby widebody plane is so adorable, so I agree with you

  • @kimboost9686

    @kimboost9686

    Ай бұрын

    its not fat

  • @surprisedgordon7786

    @surprisedgordon7786

    7 күн бұрын

    It's big bone

  • @Hammerhead547
    @Hammerhead547 Жыл бұрын

    Fun Fact: The MD12 was actually featured as a purchasable aircraft in Toei Interactive's 1993 airline business simulation AeroBiz Supersonic.

  • @SAUBER_KH7

    @SAUBER_KH7

    Жыл бұрын

    That's cool!

  • @HC-cb4yp

    @HC-cb4yp

    Жыл бұрын

    I LOVED that game. Is there a modern equivalent?

  • @SAUBER_KH7

    @SAUBER_KH7

    Жыл бұрын

    @@HC-cb4yp not that I'm aware of. There are two games that are similar come to mind: The first one is sim airport. Although that one focuses on you building an airport in addition to hosting flights. Another one is transport fever 2. Although that one is more than just planes. You can pick a starting date anywhere between 1850 and 2000, though the earliest aircraft are available In 1920 onward. You can progress through the ages and unlock newer vehicles. Either one would be a good choice in my opinion.

  • @revaholic

    @revaholic

    Жыл бұрын

    Given the safety record of the DC-10 and MD-11 I don't know if I would have trusted that company to pack even more lives into their planes.

  • @Hammerhead547

    @Hammerhead547

    Жыл бұрын

    @@revaholic From what I remember of the game (I haven't played it in 25 years) one of the trade offs of buying the MD12 was that it had a higher chance of crashing if you didn't lavish it with maintenance money.

  • @SomeOrdinaryJanitor
    @SomeOrdinaryJanitor Жыл бұрын

    the Boeing 2707 is the only never built passenger aircraft i wish was completed, even if only for a museum.

  • @nenuu91iscool

    @nenuu91iscool

    Жыл бұрын

    it's a really beautiful aircraft

  • @vf-31tomcatters

    @vf-31tomcatters

    Жыл бұрын

    Theres a mock up in some storage somewhere and if a museum acquired it, we had something similar tonthat

  • @Darakusillygoober

    @Darakusillygoober

    Жыл бұрын

    It was too ahead of its time

  • @johnjmcknightiii2964

    @johnjmcknightiii2964

    Жыл бұрын

    Just the front section of the 2707-300 exits sadly the remaining sections of the mockup deteriorated

  • @toddkes5890
    @toddkes5890 Жыл бұрын

    Chapters: 0:29 - Hawker-Siddeley HS141 (VTOL passenger jet) 1:10 - Lockheed L-500 (triple-decker cargo plane) 2:31 - Boeing 747X (Boeing's large cargo/passenger plane) 3:48 - McDonnell-Douglas MD-12 (their version of a jumbo jet) 4:43 - Lockheed-Martin Very Large Transport (really big cargo plane in a second video) 5:20 - Aerocon Dash 1.6 Wingship (big Ekranoplane) 6:03 - Boeing Sonic Cruiser (almost supersonic transport) 6:42 - Sukhoi KR-860 (large passenger plane with folding wings) 7:22 - FMA IA 36 Condor (engines inside the main hull) 8:16 - Saab 1073 (baby widebody plane) 9:00 - Dornier 728 (50-100 passenger plane) 9:34 - Plane train (plane propulsion while riding on or hanging from rails) 10:03 - Boeing 7J7 (propfan planes, efficient but loud) 10:53 - Tupolev Tu-404 (It's big. Not not that big, bigger. Bigger than that!)

  • @FoundAndExplained

    @FoundAndExplained

    Жыл бұрын

    legend

  • @nohatebeclever2188

    @nohatebeclever2188

    Жыл бұрын

    @@FoundAndExplained Author,can u make if it’s possible video about Antonov An-218,nearly build plane

  • @memyself4616

    @memyself4616

    Жыл бұрын

    Thank you!

  • @Ll-mw9sy

    @Ll-mw9sy

    Жыл бұрын

    @@nohatebeclever2188 +

  • @UA232DennyFitch

    @UA232DennyFitch

    Жыл бұрын

    Bro really copied the description 💀💀

  • @TechGroupF430i
    @TechGroupF430i Жыл бұрын

    Regarding the FMA IA 36 Condor, specifically at 7:42, I'm pretty sure there was no plan to have *anyone* sitting in that part of the plane. I mean beyond the rear doors (only accessible when the engines are off of course), it seems far more realistic that that part of the cabin would've been exclusively for luggage.

  • @ecurtis5615

    @ecurtis5615

    4 ай бұрын

    Indeed! Also I don't see that heat would've been an issue, since the exhaust would have been directed out of the rear & away from the fuselage...

  • @keithad6485
    @keithad64859 ай бұрын

    The Aerocon Dash featured in this vid, is clearly inspired by the Soviet 1960s era Ekranoplan or Caspian Sea Monster as it was nicknamed - Which was actually built and used by the Soviets.

  • @stanleybuchan4610

    @stanleybuchan4610

    Ай бұрын

    Only for use in the Caspian. It couldn't fly over oceans because of the large waves.

  • @marhawkman303

    @marhawkman303

    9 күн бұрын

    @@stanleybuchan4610 That was the basic flaw yea. the surface effect needs a FLAT surface. Hitting a wave at speed would be catastrophic.

  • @martykarr7058
    @martykarr70585 ай бұрын

    The L-5100 isn't the only time they pitched a commercialized version of a military plane. The B-29, B-36, and YB-49 had civilian spinoffs, with the first two prototyped. And North American, as part of their pitch for the XB-70 offered an entry into the SST competition based on the Valkyrie.

  • @Truex007

    @Truex007

    5 ай бұрын

    dude, a civilian Valkyrie would have been SICK!

  • @Marylandbrony
    @Marylandbrony Жыл бұрын

    The 7J7 would make a perfect commuter plane beyond Japan actually. Think Washington D.C to New York or London to Paris.

  • @jimsvideos7201
    @jimsvideos7201 Жыл бұрын

    The Tu-404 is interesting in its engineering but apart from maybe hauling liquid fuel it'd be hard to make effective use of it.

  • @Shoorit

    @Shoorit

    Жыл бұрын

    Flying gulag

  • @ronriesinger7755
    @ronriesinger7755 Жыл бұрын

    The MD-12 was physically the most attractive of this list.

  • @Joannes808
    @Joannes808 Жыл бұрын

    The Ahrens AR 404 and Baade 152 had always been my picks for abandoned airliner projects. Like the FMA IA 36, I just always loved seeing such unexpected things coming up from the left field nations.

  • @FormulaOneLeclerc
    @FormulaOneLeclerc Жыл бұрын

    I just love the fact that the Lockheed was so big that the company literally just called it "Very Large"

  • @WyvernApalis
    @WyvernApalis Жыл бұрын

    *Shows TU-404 being a massive aircraft* Ace combat: WRITE THAT DOWN WRITE THAT DOWN

  • @ljessecusterl

    @ljessecusterl

    Жыл бұрын

    Still smaller than the Aigaion.

  • @CallsignAegis

    @CallsignAegis

    Жыл бұрын

    @@ljessecusterl YEYEYEYEYEYEYEYEYSS

  • @shatter5593
    @shatter5593 Жыл бұрын

    The Saab 1073 looks like one of those toy airplanes I would play with as a kid.

  • @robrepass2179
    @robrepass2179 Жыл бұрын

    For me I think the 747x and MD-12 deserved a spot in the Aviation industry

  • @Sjkho7901

    @Sjkho7901

    Ай бұрын

    So Boeing 747X Didn't Exist in 2024

  • @86hix
    @86hix Жыл бұрын

    Yes, please, do a video about the never-built commercial supersonic planes ! Your 3D planes always look great; can't wait to see the SST Lockeed !

  • @rolflandale2565

    @rolflandale2565

    Жыл бұрын

    Yeah more 3D spec performance. Also, put them ALL in a contest with the Microsoft Simulator as the Ump!

  • @balcy129YT
    @balcy129YT Жыл бұрын

    Great Vid Keep it up watching from Australia

  • @TomCrippsTrains
    @TomCrippsTrains3 ай бұрын

    Sonic Cruiser honestly looks like something from my wildest dreams, such a stunning 'could have been'

  • @theorangeoof926
    @theorangeoof926 Жыл бұрын

    Oh if only we had those planes flying around today…anyways great work.

  • @WisnuAditya-cc5ux
    @WisnuAditya-cc5ux Жыл бұрын

    Great vid as always Now we need the military version of this Never-Built series as well

  • @serge7633
    @serge7633 Жыл бұрын

    Thanks for sharing mate. Keep up the good work. 👍

  • @poodlescone9700
    @poodlescone9700 Жыл бұрын

    An ekranoplane for Trans Pacific or Trans Atlantic routes makes the most sense. It takes much less gas to fly tens of feet above the water.

  • @bongodrumzz

    @bongodrumzz

    Жыл бұрын

    The Ekranoplane for the Trans Pacific route would have been perfect, especially as its speed would allow it to outrun potential weather issues, high wave fronts etc. Lagoons built at various way stations in the Pacific in Tonga, Samoa and the Cook Islands for example, as well as Hawaii and the Philippines would clearly have been a way to bring tourism and its benefits to an ever growing economy there too, what's not to like?

  • @SethMethCS

    @SethMethCS

    Жыл бұрын

    @@bongodrumzz and the plane can be designed to fly (albeit very inefficiently) in the event there’s a undetected cargo ship in the flight lane.

  • @facuufernandezz5070

    @facuufernandezz5070

    Жыл бұрын

    the problem with that are the waves. that design only works for lakes or some rivers

  • @rizkidary837

    @rizkidary837

    Жыл бұрын

    @@facuufernandezz5070 or ocean with small wave height (example : Java sea)

  • @mikes8155

    @mikes8155

    Жыл бұрын

    Even taking into account the increased drag from the surface of the water due to surface tension? Either the craft would be slower or would need larger engines at least

  • @CarlosConsorcioCastellanoPerez
    @CarlosConsorcioCastellanoPerez Жыл бұрын

    The Lockheed VLT should have been built IMO.

  • @rsookchand919
    @rsookchand9197 ай бұрын

    I like to think there’s a alternate timeline where these were in service

  • @Raul1971xxx
    @Raul1971xxx Жыл бұрын

    The 728 looks very cute.. 🙂👍🇪🇸

  • @merafirewing6591
    @merafirewing6591 Жыл бұрын

    Pretty sad that the 747X and MD-12 and Lockheed's Very Large Transport never got the chance to take off.

  • @Ryuu1010YT

    @Ryuu1010YT

    2 ай бұрын

    probably range, cost fuel, cost operation and other things. tbh these 3 planes has to be my favorite

  • @CaptKak1954
    @CaptKak1954 Жыл бұрын

    I am so disgusted and offended that they betrayed my boy Saab 1073 😢

  • @Ryuu1010YT

    @Ryuu1010YT

    2 ай бұрын

    too small, short range and problems that is what i was thinking

  • @FajarRizkiBachsinar
    @FajarRizkiBachsinar3 ай бұрын

    I like both the 747X, MD 12, & the KR 860

  • @darrenwest9319
    @darrenwest9319 Жыл бұрын

    There was a 767 double decker concept that never made it to production. That would make an interesting video. :)

  • @FoundAndExplained

    @FoundAndExplained

    Жыл бұрын

    Your right the 767x…

  • @Abirdguy

    @Abirdguy

    3 ай бұрын

    Wouldn’t that just be a A380? But with 2 engines

  • @ChristoAbrie
    @ChristoAbrie19 күн бұрын

    Gotta say, that Lockheed VLT looks insane

  • @jonathanriddle3465
    @jonathanriddle3465 Жыл бұрын

    I would love to see a video just like this talking about the super sonic airliners we lost such as the Concorde.

  • @stickynorth
    @stickynorth8 ай бұрын

    The HS141 I think is the most fascinating because VTOL aircraft are still some of the most difficult to design and operate and yet when they do offer the most versatile operations possible especially in nations like Canada where most people live in very dense increasingly mega-sized cities spread out across vast distances... And yes please make a second video focusing on just SST projects both Commercial and Private as both have had their dizzying share of concepts all unbuilt thus far...

  • @blackhawk69100
    @blackhawk69100 Жыл бұрын

    A great collection. Super sonic version would be great

  • @georgehernandez4079
    @georgehernandez4079 Жыл бұрын

    I’m in love with the 747X!!

  • @hawkmoon419
    @hawkmoon419 Жыл бұрын

    Thanks for the cool video. Could have mentioned the Convair 37 which was the proposed airliner version of XC-99 transport. Would definitely like a video about SSTs that were never built.

  • @ChessMasterNate
    @ChessMasterNate Жыл бұрын

    We need a video on possible future eVTOLs. There are apparently more than 100 startups, but most will probably never make anything. There are a number of interesting prototypes though. Probably a lot of work to make such an episode, as you have to make at least 4 CGI models.

  • @SethMethCS
    @SethMethCS Жыл бұрын

    IMO the FMA IA 36 Condor and SAAB 1073 have solid niches that could make a program successful if the designs were picked up by someone with the same determination as the Founder of Boom supersonic. The best part is being able to adapt existing tech instead of developing novel tech for the critical aircraft systems.

  • @farhanatashiga3721

    @farhanatashiga3721

    Жыл бұрын

    Unfortunately people with those kinds of ambition and determination are more inclined to chase novel ideas such as supersonic travel than the simple regional jet transport.

  • @kendallfleet
    @kendallfleet7 ай бұрын

    The last one is like a kids idea of a “dream jet”

  • @hungarianlad9734
    @hungarianlad9734 Жыл бұрын

    You guys should do one for fighters, that would be super interesting

  • @nolesy34

    @nolesy34

    Жыл бұрын

    A fighter commercialised now that would be a sweet ny york to london

  • @Bucketroo
    @Bucketroo2 ай бұрын

    Astounding how you manage to talk about the Aerocon Dash 1.6 Wingship without ever uttering the word "ekranoplan", WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT IT IS! 10:16 - It sounds like you're saying "prop-fed technology". These types of engines were known as "unducted fans" at the time, and some did enter service.

  • @Chimpunk729
    @Chimpunk729 Жыл бұрын

    Great video...su kr860 is my favorite

  • @repairman22
    @repairman22 Жыл бұрын

    Excellent video friend. I also make 3D videos on engines and cars but with solidworks, not with blender. I will have to start using it. Great video again!

  • @dangerotterisrea
    @dangerotterisrea Жыл бұрын

    A WIG commercial aircraft would be awesome

  • @patrickracer43
    @patrickracer433 ай бұрын

    Lockheed-Maritn, designing the VLT: "look, we all might not like each other, but I need your help with this plane" Boeing and Airbus: "lmao no, we won't help you with your pipe dream cargo plane"

  • @stangundam01
    @stangundam01 Жыл бұрын

    some of the planes that really should get another look are the lockeed very large transport, boeing super pelican, lockeed L-500 & aerocon

  • @richardbriansmith8562
    @richardbriansmith85624 ай бұрын

    Awesome Video 😊

  • @leezinke4351
    @leezinke4351 Жыл бұрын

    Boeing sonic cruiser look very gorgeous!

  • @eolay903
    @eolay903 Жыл бұрын

    The Boeing sonic cruiser should have been built, it sucks how we don’t have many interesting commercial airliners nowadays

  • @DJAYPAZ
    @DJAYPAZ Жыл бұрын

    Interesting video. I would like to see a video about full scale mock-ups like the one that was built for the American competitor for the Concorde. It never made past the mock-up stage.

  • @FoundAndExplained

    @FoundAndExplained

    Жыл бұрын

    I have that in my channel. L-2000 Lockheed :)

  • @colinboneham7387
    @colinboneham7387 Жыл бұрын

    VC10 double decker got missed of the list imo, it would have been the only T Tail double decker ever.

  • @Mr_oof_blox
    @Mr_oof_blox8 ай бұрын

    8:09 Thank you for flying Ryanair, last year over 90% of our gear broken

  • @DEP717
    @DEP717 Жыл бұрын

    The Argentine Airliner might have been able to use asbestos as both heat and sound insulation, but they would need a lot of it. The Boeing 727, and L-1011 pulled similar stuff off. Granted that was with engines of a later generation. Argentina's shift makes me think, they could have gotten into the position Brazil got into with Embraer. Of course, the question is if the tech and market conditions could have lined up for them in that time frame as opposed to Embraer's. The Argentine jet was designed by Kurt Tank, who had designed the FW-200 Condor and the FW-190 Fighter in the 1930s and 40s.

  • @EgyptstudiosFlightEngine
    @EgyptstudiosFlightEngineАй бұрын

    The wingship looks like something i would see in aviation dreamcore

  • @LeftistUprising
    @LeftistUprising Жыл бұрын

    0:05 - I want my planes to ALWAYS be the most boring thing ever.

  • @jimsvideos7201
    @jimsvideos7201 Жыл бұрын

    BAe 146: Has four engines because six wouldn't fit. HS 141: Lol, noob.

  • @Virgos_aviation201

    @Virgos_aviation201

    3 ай бұрын

    Member!?!?!?

  • @aristeidislykas7163
    @aristeidislykas7163 Жыл бұрын

    01:17 "...civil version..." What a pity they did not build it! Every airplane should also come in a more gentle, civil version!

  • @infernaldaedra

    @infernaldaedra

    Жыл бұрын

    If you've ever been inside a c-5 galaxy it's straight fckn mind bogglingly huge in the cargo bay

  • @CarlosConsorcioCastellanoPerez

    @CarlosConsorcioCastellanoPerez

    Жыл бұрын

    @@infernaldaedra bro yeah I just remember being amazed how high the roof was, things are like flying apartment blocks.

  • @infernaldaedra

    @infernaldaedra

    Жыл бұрын

    @@CarlosConsorcioCastellanoPerez almost enough room to play football in there lol

  • @shakawhenthewallsfell8570
    @shakawhenthewallsfell8570 Жыл бұрын

    I think there was a Boeing Blended Wingbody concept. It was smaller than the Tu-404 and would be powered by three (I think) GE-90 engines on inverted pylons at the back.

  • @MrTaxiRob
    @MrTaxiRob Жыл бұрын

    A passenger version of the AN-225 would have been amazing. China was going to develop one under license from Antonov before the bottom fell out of the industry.

  • @ACNordstrom
    @ACNordstrom Жыл бұрын

    An acronoplane passenger jet would be cool

  • @roaling
    @roaling8 ай бұрын

    Bro that 404 is fricking massive how is that only 1000 passengers 1000 singapore first class passengers?

  • @trainglen22
    @trainglen22 Жыл бұрын

    Holy crap, the Flying wing is huge!

  • @biohazardia4608
    @biohazardia4608 Жыл бұрын

    I think that the Boeing Sonic Cruser as well as the Sukoi KR-860 are the best concept aircrafts. The first one for speedtravelling, better than Concorde, the KR-860 for comfortabe transport of lots people and a great cargo amount.

  • @StarlordYT69
    @StarlordYT696 ай бұрын

    Hair jell:special thanks. 😂😂😂

  • @mauretaniafan1133
    @mauretaniafan1133 Жыл бұрын

    why do i love the look of double-decker planes so much?

  • @pepitolevrai2255
    @pepitolevrai2255 Жыл бұрын

    More of this with cargo plane pls

  • @JerlDabucol
    @JerlDabucol19 күн бұрын

    The McDonnell Douglas Md-12 was an Airbus A380 competitor.

  • @antontsau
    @antontsau Жыл бұрын

    big planes (double and even triple deckers) all have the same problem - if something happens you have to transport corpses by dump tracks. No one will be able to jump out in time (90sec!) before it turns to fire and smoke grave. Its the reason why A380 was never made in single-class configuration with about 700 passengers onboard, even it required only seat reconfiguration.

  • @ChessMasterNate
    @ChessMasterNate Жыл бұрын

    Oh, could you do one on the quad-chopper version of the Osprey?

  • @kimboost9686
    @kimboost9686Ай бұрын

    12:00 I love the music

  • @warrenwattles8397
    @warrenwattles8397 Жыл бұрын

    Fairy Rotodyne would have been a crazy passenger aircraft

  • @paulmcgown7504

    @paulmcgown7504

    Жыл бұрын

    Crazy yes and a fuel pig that would have no commercial application today. Designed for city to city market it would also have been unpopular due to the noise for take off. Saying that, US marines insisted of reinventing the wheel with the Osprey V-22, even more complicated and with the embarrassing tendency to fall out of the sky.

  • @yungphan9273
    @yungphan92733 ай бұрын

    Good video!😃👍

  • @Nucleon-7
    @Nucleon-7Ай бұрын

    That war robots background music is fire🔥

  • @arypramana6154
    @arypramana6154 Жыл бұрын

    A lot of these is just Plane: haha me big Fuel: *bonjour*

  • @Zreknarf
    @Zreknarf Жыл бұрын

    ground effect planes are so cool, hope someone builds one some day

  • @WCE107
    @WCE107 Жыл бұрын

    The TU-404 is an absolute unit.

  • @richardlionheart3965
    @richardlionheart39652 ай бұрын

    The book "Stuck on the drawing board" is great for more info on the British vstol airliners and lots of other UK designs that never made it for economic or political reasons.

  • @BlockheadzPlanes
    @BlockheadzPlanes10 күн бұрын

    Maybe for the 7J7 and 745 they could have used only 1 propulsion method during low level flight, takeoff, and landing, but two during cruising which is the majority of the flight time.

  • @Ravenous1369
    @Ravenous1369 Жыл бұрын

    This may sound weird but I'm still not over the loss of the Sonic Cruiser. It was one of the first concept aircraft I learned about while it was in development after catching some Discovery Channel special about future planes back in '01 and to me it still looks way cooler than any conventional aircraft we've gotten since. Course that's exactly the sort of reason why it didn't pan out, still I'm on the lookout for a nice model to own and hope that some flight sim developer somewhere has decided to put that beauty into their game for weirdos like me.

  • @newhank21
    @newhank21 Жыл бұрын

    You should explore one of the craziest seaplane concepts, the Saunders Roe Queen, a 1000 passenger flying boat designed to fly to Australia.

  • @Dedyouth
    @Dedyouth2 ай бұрын

    anyone else notice, when the commentator says subscribe, the subscribe button lights up? pretty cool feature

  • @maslos168
    @maslos168 Жыл бұрын

    That landing with aerolinias argentinas 😂😂😂

  • @craze5001
    @craze5001 Жыл бұрын

    You earned a subscriber!

  • @Duvstep910
    @Duvstep910 Жыл бұрын

    i love the soviets' larger-than-life thinking

  • @thies7831
    @thies78312 ай бұрын

    1:00 Mot just "fuel hungry", anyone having heard test planes will agree that such a technology was "SCREAMING LOUD" !!! -until moving into horizontal travelling mode.

  • @TrailRat2000
    @TrailRat2000 Жыл бұрын

    I'd definitely like to learn more about supersonic aircraft. And possibly see a video about scram jet tech.

  • @goldthree9964

    @goldthree9964

    Жыл бұрын

    It’s Scramjet actually it’s all one word it’s a common mistake dude

  • @TrailRat2000

    @TrailRat2000

    Жыл бұрын

    @@goldthree9964I'm not sure it's entirely important for the sake of a KZread comment but while we're discussing proper language etiquette... "Scramjet, dude, all one word." But thank you for bringing my error to my attention. I shall endeavour to remedy this issue going forward.

  • @dogday56743
    @dogday567433 ай бұрын

    B747x and md-12:i can explain A380:no you dont

  • @noahbowie5985
    @noahbowie5985 Жыл бұрын

    The problem with the sonic cruiser is that it was neither fast nor fuel efficient enough. Concorde worked bc it was fast enough to offset the fuel inefficiency

  • @HAYAOLEONE
    @HAYAOLEONE Жыл бұрын

    Like the SAAB and the one from Argentina.

  • @EvanG529
    @EvanG529 Жыл бұрын

    Completely agree, most stuff in the skies these days is boring.

  • @Ryuu1010YT

    @Ryuu1010YT

    2 ай бұрын

    design looks cool but more problems

  • @AmberDoodle_
    @AmberDoodle_3 ай бұрын

    Whenever a plane takes up to much runway, I yell THEN MAKE THE ENGINES TURN 90 DEGREES!!!

  • @user-yc2oz8kc5k
    @user-yc2oz8kc5k26 күн бұрын

    (6:02) The Boeing Sonic Cruiser to me has the look of the future generation of jetliners. Airbus is also testing a small scale model of a similar looking aircraft. For these reasons I am convinced this is the look their later jetliners are going to adopt. The technology to build these is already available.

  • @OCTConteudo
    @OCTConteudo Жыл бұрын

    I missed the 767X, the model of Boeing 767 with a 757 fuselage on top of it

  • @chippyshake2502
    @chippyshake25029 ай бұрын

    not the tu-404 in design 💀💀💀💀

  • @Swiss100
    @Swiss1004 ай бұрын

    Bro roasted everyone when saying -planes that we have now are boring-.

  • @sevcankaya3157
    @sevcankaya3157 Жыл бұрын

    Thank you

  • @draggonsgate
    @draggonsgate Жыл бұрын

    The Saab is so cute!

  • @syngabes
    @syngabes7 ай бұрын

    dude i really dont know why the saab 1073 failed. it is so damn cute bro

  • @Ryuu1010YT

    @Ryuu1010YT

    6 ай бұрын

    size were too small

  • @ITZTrudeau23
    @ITZTrudeau237 ай бұрын

    I think it was better for Lockheed to address the L-500 project.

  • @monkee-remig.
    @monkee-remig.2 ай бұрын

    the first shot of the video was in my dream