That's Why Nobody Want To Mess With US Army Check out to our science channel ► Brain Impact: / brainimpact
Жүктеу.....
Пікірлер: 281
@curtisblanco40293 ай бұрын
The Himars? I love it.
@user-kk8vc9ck3tАй бұрын
I like the lighter weight of the Booker because it enables the vehicle to traverse soggy ground better than an M1 series tank. I've heard that light and medium armor cannot compete with heavy armor on the battlefield, but battles have been won by light and medium armor because they can get in places heavy armor can't go. I don't know if that formula still applies today, with modern engines, but the M1 series tanks are mighty heavy.
@OIFIIIOIF-VET4 ай бұрын
People don't understand that the "new" stuff they see that's so impressive is already 10-15 years old. There are weapon systems you have no idea about.
@Optionsforall
4 ай бұрын
10-15 years ahead of the competition!!!
@gilbertsmith3087
4 ай бұрын
You are 20 to 30 years short on your estimate. 😮😅😂😂
@Optionsforall
4 ай бұрын
@@gilbertsmith3087 what country do you represent??
@gilbertsmith3087
4 ай бұрын
@@Optionsforall:THE 🇺🇸 USA WE ARE DECADES AHEAD OF EVERYONE, DOUBT IT AT YOUR OWN RISK. 😮😢😅😂😂
@Bronco46tube
4 ай бұрын
You just had to add that didn't you. 10 -15 is closer on weapons at the time of when then first go into production. The B-52 is about 80 years out of date now but was almost cutting edge when released. So there's quibbling about dates is just silly.@@gilbertsmith3087
@christinecoughlan46994 ай бұрын
Gracias Liu .
@chadduda4981Ай бұрын
I like the idea of the booker this way it could come quick and help ground support soldiers fighting❤🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💥💥💥💨💨💪🦾💪🦾👊👊👊🔥🔥🚀🚀🚀🚀☠️☠️☠️💯
@jampasurprenant17943 сағат бұрын
I'm very proud of humans .
@Jacquez1stBegottinАй бұрын
Another phenomenal attributes of good ole USA military...all serving sign up out ta desire not duty..
@swagzoneusАй бұрын
These machines are absolutely crazy!
@Stewart001Ай бұрын
Canada has only 5 Globemaster III's. I got to fly in a Hercules once being evacuated out of a flooded area. R.C.A.F
@michaelhopper26933 ай бұрын
Wasn’t designed for insurgency warfare
@Syed_aruSyed_aruАй бұрын
Unstoppable❤
@KarenNaytowhowАй бұрын
And the Patriot air defence mobile missile /rocket system
@aaronellington55462 ай бұрын
This is step in the right direction, but more needs to be done more improvements
@simonbaflo57954 ай бұрын
Propaganda is no gamechanger.
@willisransom8056 күн бұрын
Awesome video 👏👏👏
@tiptoe384 ай бұрын
And the war goes on.😮
@ahamedchowdhury6106Ай бұрын
Afganistan did.. and was able to move USA out... Vietnam did... there are many armies who can stand in front of the USA
@brianmarsh65926 күн бұрын
The “Booker” needs defense against drones and other such threats that will arise from battles from less powerful nations but who can afford many drones to attack the superior enemy forces without tanks or artillery of their own
@90stroll86Ай бұрын
haha vietanam withu bow and arrows laughing
@borcemiovski24 күн бұрын
all of the game changers are on display in red square
@geraldabbott61864 ай бұрын
THANK YOU FOR SHARING THIS WITH ME.
@a_bar85794 ай бұрын
United States powerful and must more progressive ❤
@tedwang90621 күн бұрын
Mighty America can’t even defeat Taliban.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@noodle37684 ай бұрын
Those weapons are dinosaurs. Drones will be the future.
@gusgone4527
4 ай бұрын
lol ho ho ho. No way. They are so vulnerable to the newly developed countermeasures. People used to say the attack helicopter was the end of every fighting vehicle on the modern battlefield. Now every infantry section carries RBS 70 NG. MANPADS or Starstreak Anti-Aircraft Guided Missile System. Go ask the russian and ukrainian orcs how that has turned out.
@noodle3768
4 ай бұрын
@@gusgone4527 your manpad shot down the drone, you lost. Your manpad didn't shoot down the drone, you lost big.
@zlatkodzakula8626
4 ай бұрын
HRVATSKA je kupila Bradly IFV. jako dobra stvar. ALI MORA KUPITI novi Abrams X Nove Abrams X model je najbolji novi tenk na svijetu. I još 150 komada KF 51 tenk iz Njemačke. ALI novi Abrams X ne ima nosi novi top iz Njemačkig KF 51. kalibar 130mm.
@gusgone4527
4 ай бұрын
@@zlatkodzakula8626 jibber jabber tosh bladder.
@zlatkodzakula8626
4 ай бұрын
@@gusgone4527 CROATIA bought Bradly IFV. very good thing. BUT MUST BUY the new Abrams X The new Abrams X model is the best new tank in the world. And another 150 pieces of KF 51 tanks from Germany. BUT the new Abrams X does not have a new cannon from the German KF 51 caliber 130mm. Croatia must buy new armor. Croatia has a border with Serbia. We know that Serbia is allied with Putin and Russia. This is the reason why he has to buy a new tank. It must defend the EU's eastern borders. (Excuse me for my bad English)
@odeldawson38393 ай бұрын
These videos make it look and sound so easy😂
@user-tp6xg5dt4q6 күн бұрын
I love my great to great Amrica..❤❤
@rickymwamba968126 күн бұрын
I saw a couple of them on display at Moscow military museum! They are Russia's toys in Ukraine!
@miguelmorales96674 ай бұрын
I have been reading the comments to this video, and wondering how many of them were written by Russian bots as their command of the English language is abysmal. 8-)
@user-hs8sd1cs2q4 ай бұрын
Hello nice video me being ex u.s. military disability vet I believe highly of the u.s. army
@user-qx6iw3sx2l
4 ай бұрын
Why? What makes you believe in an army that has never won a war on its own since the Mexico war
@MiltonFindley
4 ай бұрын
@@user-qx6iw3sx2l - Politics. Different story on the ground.
@user-qx6iw3sx2l
4 ай бұрын
@@MiltonFindley you need to go get some help or write In your own language as you make absolutely no sense at all 🤯
@MiltonFindley
4 ай бұрын
@@user-qx6iw3sx2l - I wrote a doctoral dissertation and survived several firefights. My guess is that you haven't done either.
@Optionsforall4 ай бұрын
It wasn’t built last year, but construction has perfected the weapon!!!
@martinrasmussen7754
4 ай бұрын
Updates...
@Optionsforall
2 ай бұрын
@@martinrasmussen7754 still kicking butt
@techtitanuk56094 ай бұрын
Issue is there expensive and hard to mass produce. Better to go for cheaper tanks that can be built faster
@tiptoe38
4 ай бұрын
That y America will have a hard time fighting a long war,the cost.
@savagegamez167419 күн бұрын
ELECTRIC JAMMERS ARE KILLING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF HIMARS
@azymight24 күн бұрын
russian - hold my beer. lol
@stefaniewelters4 ай бұрын
Buttiful
@itsghanta1201Ай бұрын
Vietnamese laughing in corner 😂😂😂😂😂
@tealelliott5052
13 күн бұрын
Vietnamese had to fight from caves never on a battlefield.
@Stewart001Ай бұрын
HIMARS is bada$$
@fastscpinc.5594Ай бұрын
I do believe that there is s replacement on the way for the Bradly - the M-30 (?). I also think the M-10 Booker has a hybrid drive system to improve fuel efficiency and supply electricity for future weapon systems - lasers. I think lasers will be front and center for future weapons. Also, the US military is actively working to use alternative fuels and reduce fuel consumption. That may give their modern weapon systems very significant advantages.
@cesarpaulinho28242 ай бұрын
Cesar❤❤palin😊😊😊😊😊
@churka46126 күн бұрын
HOW IS THE VEHICLE ON THE PREVIEW CALLED HELP
@peterpillay1644Ай бұрын
Bless America
@sovanrithnoun2870Ай бұрын
nice
@ricknugent982615 күн бұрын
Only to capture their best tank in Russia
@rollievancleave77534 ай бұрын
Funny how the Taliban were not impressed with our “high tech” weapons.
@haroldayat2066
4 ай бұрын
Can’t be impressed if you’re ignorant
@rollievancleave7753
4 ай бұрын
@@haroldayat2066well, thank you.
@Bronco46tube
4 ай бұрын
If you had been there you would have realized they were impressed and fearful of our weapons. That's why they rarely made frontal attacks.
@rollievancleave7753
4 ай бұрын
@@Bronco46tube how do you know I was not there? Obviously, they won the war without frontal attacks or high tech weapons. We are the ones who left the battlefield (rightfully so) along with our allies and the Soviets. We had 20 years and numerous troop surges to defeat them and failed to do it. Empires go there to die.
@user-qx6iw3sx2l
4 ай бұрын
@@haroldayat2066no you are the one that is ignorant hahaha
@RebeccaChopemontero-zw5ik3 ай бұрын
lauriano ondo nsue mangue contra china españa guinea ecuatorial estados unidos africa
@paulcoverdale83124 ай бұрын
These guys made a appearance during the Iraq conflict/war. Now apart from drones, these are arguably the single most important bits of kit on the battlefield.❤❤❤⭐️⭐️⭐️🙏🙏🙏🪬🪬🪬💎💎💎💯💯💯🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
@gilbertsmith3087
4 ай бұрын
That we are allowed to know about at the moment, we all might be surprised in our next war at what the USA put on the battlefield, and in the skies I'm sure of IT. 😮🫨😉🙃🫠😜🤪🫣😅😂😂🫡🫡❤❤
@johnhopkins62602 ай бұрын
How many fit in a C-5?
@davidkyzer7045
Ай бұрын
3 loaded
@andrewhatton16064 ай бұрын
Why would cat still make motors for the same government that destroyed them
@Gideonfinancial3 ай бұрын
For mirs than 20 years wnd spent over a trillion dollars putting them more in debt, and still left shamefully leaving behind millions of dollars worth of military equipment for the taliban 😅😅😅.
@stanleydavidson6543
Ай бұрын
Thanks to the biden administration
@user-rs9ys6ly5n4 ай бұрын
off no one should do
@cesarpaulinho28242 ай бұрын
❤❤😊
@comchadelalora3 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂good one
@Chairman-Mao3 ай бұрын
Russia maze wachana nao..
@Tiger_Slot66outlook3 ай бұрын
Whatever man.
@cesarpaulinho28242 ай бұрын
❤❤😊😊😊😊😊😊
@user-ko6jm7sb9t4 ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@ArmyLRR-sx9eoАй бұрын
💛💛💙💙
@tmafungo8428 күн бұрын
Changed no game in Ukraina
@sparxart1319Ай бұрын
😲😲😲😲😲😲😲💯💯
@ShaneMaereАй бұрын
We aiant in debt we rich
@ShaneMaere
Ай бұрын
$179000,000,000,000,000.oo
@Chris-ur7mp4 ай бұрын
Fort sill
@EsamAlashoOsh-br4boАй бұрын
Ukraine must be supported 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🕊️🕊️🕊️📧🕊️🕊️🕊️🙏
@tuyamrong3470
23 күн бұрын
Not yet the time
@maigepresents58404 ай бұрын
Lol... looks like a bunch of them just got yeeted in Syria...
@neuza3054 ай бұрын
usa needs these weapons to keep america great
@itninja7771
4 ай бұрын
A MUCH MORE RIGOROUS K-12 PRIMARY EDUCATIONAL SCHOOL SYSTEM IN ASIA, INDIA, EASTERN EUROPE, AND MANY MORE HAVE made these countries enormously powerful and great. Early RIGEROUS CHILDHOOD EDUCATION MAKES A STRONG country. Not, tattoos, dinted colorful hair, dirty beards, overweight Americans.
@Bronco46tube
4 ай бұрын
The US needs weapons to help keep Democracy alive in as many countries as possible. When did you serve,. What was your MOS? Where did you get you information from? It doesn't't like personal experience.
@wizie01
4 ай бұрын
@@Bronco46tubelet’s be honest, us needs them to bully and oppress other countries 😂 no one is trying to kill democracy, just lies you tell yourself.
@user-qx6iw3sx2l
4 ай бұрын
@@Bronco46tubejust wait a minute the USA does not care about democracy in another country all they care about is their interests and that it
@user-be4ld5vz9d3 ай бұрын
They ran away from afganistan
@T.BJones
Ай бұрын
Should of never went and better they left....2 trillion could of been used better...
@genem8954 ай бұрын
After collection evidence of Himars effectiveness in Ukraine, it didn't become a game changer - 10% is not a good number. HIMARS vs Tornado S specs, Tornado s missiles range 120 kilometers and it's much more of them on one vehicle.
@asifbulledi484Ай бұрын
Lost war against Afghanistan and Vietnam 😅
@ScottBarnhart-uh8vh3 ай бұрын
I work with the company that makes the steering system.
@dnate6974 ай бұрын
120mm, not 105 LOL!
@Bronco46tube
4 ай бұрын
Ahh, it was originally released with a 105mm until August of 1985. As of 1985 the M-1A1 went into production with the german made 125 smooth bore cannon. Most of the original M-1's were upgraded.
@dnate697
4 ай бұрын
@@Bronco46tube M256 is a built in America Licensed Copy of L-44 RH 120mm. M-1A1 and M1A2 were tested with the L-55. Tests failed because we couldn't fully stabilize it well enough. The person told me that the rest of the TRIALS are Classified but not top secret or etc, OBTW, the 105mm M-68 is a Lic Copy of the British L-7. I was on Panzer Kaserne in Feb of 1985 when we picked up M1/105mm.
@HenryGates-vr7fn3 ай бұрын
Will it be OK in woods😄
@Davidher48020 күн бұрын
The USA is so powerful but still lost too,2 country that is still in the stone age, what is the use of have so much power ,but can't beat the stone age country,
@materesamancilla44753 ай бұрын
dapat bumili tayo ng maraming himars raket system sa us para para pang kuntra sa china kapag sumalakay sila mainland ng phl
@kibwikaisaac11Ай бұрын
How comes they're defeated by The Taliban😂😂
@ApplyWithCaution4 ай бұрын
... pride goeth before a fall ...
@user-nd7re2sg9w
Ай бұрын
True
@mortezarezael800421 күн бұрын
The USA army under Biden administration , I don’t think if the himars work 😂😂
@naturecraftmarble83563 ай бұрын
The Taliban & Vietnamese will disagree with your title
@antskaljurand3091
3 ай бұрын
We won every battle and politics lost the war not our solders and equipment.
@ghostcode88094 ай бұрын
Ok let’s see how it goes in real life 😂
@travhammer4 ай бұрын
Though we have many faults. We are the government of the people. By the people. For.. The people.... Never again will such a statement be allowed by man in an attempt to govern further a Constitutional Republic of Representative Government.
@RebeccaChopemontero-zw5ik3 ай бұрын
lauriano ondo nsue mangue contra china españa 2024 guinea ecuatorial estados unidos africa
@sub3ero984Ай бұрын
Vietcong & Talibans 😂😂😂😂 who
@eliaskwesiga8255Ай бұрын
We shall find out the whole truth in Ukraine war😂😂😂😂
@gusgone45274 ай бұрын
I'd rather have MLRS.
@tommygun5038
4 ай бұрын
They have both.
@gusgone4527
4 ай бұрын
@@tommygun5038 I know they do and they are complimentary rather than HIMARS replacing MLRS. I watched MLRS letting rip during Desert Storm. Truly awesome kit and that was with the older generation rockets.
@tommygun5038
4 ай бұрын
@@gusgone4527 .....They both fire the same rockets. It's just ones tracked and carries twice the rockets but doesn't shoot and scoot as fast as the himars.
@gusgone4527
4 ай бұрын
@@tommygun5038 I'm well aware of that too. But the selection of projectiles has grown since my time in uniform. MLRS is no slouch when it comes to scooting, trust me. Our local reserve unit has them, 101st Reg, Royal Artillery. Often see them out and about training.
@tommygun5038
4 ай бұрын
@@gusgone4527 ....Any tracked vehicle is going to be more maintenance though.
@user-cg1vm5fl8l4 ай бұрын
Then you don't know what happened in Ukraine.
@nabobcisav918715 күн бұрын
Bla bla bla bla bla bla bla.
@Davidher48020 күн бұрын
The only country that the USA don't want to mess with is vietnam and Afghanistan, this 2 country kick the US ass ,hahaha, lost to a country that is in the stone age,
@sumyat3089 күн бұрын
Fuck
@user-lt2ze3bs7u3 ай бұрын
Hahahhahhahah bs
@tmafungo8428 күн бұрын
Taliban: hold my goat
@jtpenman3 ай бұрын
Russian and Chinese bots are earning their paychecks in these comments
@badleeshahghani4154 ай бұрын
US army only capable of fighting Yemen militias in the Red Sea. In Ukraine, the weapons supplied by US to Ukraine including Himars have nothing at all against the Russian khinzal and kamikaze Lancet. Even with the Himars in the frontline, Russian army simply pounded them off with Lancet.
@viktorgv7937
2 күн бұрын
what a total BS. Kinzhal was intrecepeted MULTIPLE times by Patriot, proved to be a joke instead on hypersonic missile. Lancet does not run up to 80km, educate yourself. Not even mentioning that S300-400 is TOTALLY incapable of intercepting ATACMS missiles. Hiamars does not not have to be on the frontline. And by the way, Iraq army notest the difference. Read some history.
@eliaskwesiga8255Ай бұрын
😂😂 where were those machines in Afghanistan war?
@FidelCastro4044 ай бұрын
Afghanistan anyone
@user-fi1ow8hs9gАй бұрын
Sorry but don't mess with the israeli military.
@almahilum22334 күн бұрын
You don't fight alone....you used bait for your war,ex. Is Ukraine fight your own!do not used bait!
@Sevastopol914 ай бұрын
"Nobody wants to mess with US army" because the US army is mostly stationed on US territory, which is thousands of miles away from many major power, separated from the world by two vast oceans. And the only times when US army leaves the safety of North American continent is when it attacks some small 3rd world nation where the US military considers its success guaranteed. But, the US military also doesn't want to mess with major powers, such as Russia and China, where its success is not only not guaranteed, but the failure most likely will occur. And failure means defeat. So, tell us more of your pep talk stories 😃))
@jarrettdossey7300
3 ай бұрын
I guess the US army only being on US territory might sound like some tough talk but we love our army and they are backed by the largest militia in the world, bigger than all militaries combined, and if we have to quit our jobs to make tank parts that is what will happen.
@brendansavage1654 ай бұрын
😂😂😂 couldn't even beat Afghanistan freedom fighters
@ps9898
4 ай бұрын
Cry 😂
@jerrykelley9266
4 ай бұрын
Lol
@ramiromarquez9716
4 ай бұрын
Freedom fighters ? ? Thouse with sandals that shoots you and then they run and used women and children as Shell ? ? ?
@catrinawilliamson5488
4 ай бұрын
The United States still powerful tho🤪
@ps9898
4 ай бұрын
@@catrinawilliamson5488 Of course the strongest most advanced millitary on earth. I dont even understand how people can compare Russia that still uces WW2 stuff to such a country the US is.. Hell... They compare Russia to NATO XD
@bilalbazzi5002Ай бұрын
U S, the weakest country
@user-ug3bi2qx9h13 күн бұрын
Lawanla rusia kalau kau berani...no 1 dalam dunia adalah rusia.
@tedwang90621 күн бұрын
Game-changer,mighty weapon, is in Moscow for exhibition.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣what a joke US is.
@Sophie-iv4ci4 ай бұрын
Oh really? 😮 But it lost in Korea, then Vietnam. And recently Afghanistan 😅
@TaraNrs4 ай бұрын
USA has run away from Afghanistan, you are fighting against Pushtuns and farmers. Against an army that has everything: tanks, rockets, drones, airplanes.
Пікірлер: 281
The Himars? I love it.
I like the lighter weight of the Booker because it enables the vehicle to traverse soggy ground better than an M1 series tank. I've heard that light and medium armor cannot compete with heavy armor on the battlefield, but battles have been won by light and medium armor because they can get in places heavy armor can't go. I don't know if that formula still applies today, with modern engines, but the M1 series tanks are mighty heavy.
People don't understand that the "new" stuff they see that's so impressive is already 10-15 years old. There are weapon systems you have no idea about.
@Optionsforall
4 ай бұрын
10-15 years ahead of the competition!!!
@gilbertsmith3087
4 ай бұрын
You are 20 to 30 years short on your estimate. 😮😅😂😂
@Optionsforall
4 ай бұрын
@@gilbertsmith3087 what country do you represent??
@gilbertsmith3087
4 ай бұрын
@@Optionsforall:THE 🇺🇸 USA WE ARE DECADES AHEAD OF EVERYONE, DOUBT IT AT YOUR OWN RISK. 😮😢😅😂😂
@Bronco46tube
4 ай бұрын
You just had to add that didn't you. 10 -15 is closer on weapons at the time of when then first go into production. The B-52 is about 80 years out of date now but was almost cutting edge when released. So there's quibbling about dates is just silly.@@gilbertsmith3087
Gracias Liu .
I like the idea of the booker this way it could come quick and help ground support soldiers fighting❤🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💥💥💥💨💨💪🦾💪🦾👊👊👊🔥🔥🚀🚀🚀🚀☠️☠️☠️💯
I'm very proud of humans .
Another phenomenal attributes of good ole USA military...all serving sign up out ta desire not duty..
These machines are absolutely crazy!
Canada has only 5 Globemaster III's. I got to fly in a Hercules once being evacuated out of a flooded area. R.C.A.F
Wasn’t designed for insurgency warfare
Unstoppable❤
And the Patriot air defence mobile missile /rocket system
This is step in the right direction, but more needs to be done more improvements
Propaganda is no gamechanger.
Awesome video 👏👏👏
And the war goes on.😮
Afganistan did.. and was able to move USA out... Vietnam did... there are many armies who can stand in front of the USA
The “Booker” needs defense against drones and other such threats that will arise from battles from less powerful nations but who can afford many drones to attack the superior enemy forces without tanks or artillery of their own
haha vietanam withu bow and arrows laughing
all of the game changers are on display in red square
THANK YOU FOR SHARING THIS WITH ME.
United States powerful and must more progressive ❤
Mighty America can’t even defeat Taliban.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Those weapons are dinosaurs. Drones will be the future.
@gusgone4527
4 ай бұрын
lol ho ho ho. No way. They are so vulnerable to the newly developed countermeasures. People used to say the attack helicopter was the end of every fighting vehicle on the modern battlefield. Now every infantry section carries RBS 70 NG. MANPADS or Starstreak Anti-Aircraft Guided Missile System. Go ask the russian and ukrainian orcs how that has turned out.
@noodle3768
4 ай бұрын
@@gusgone4527 your manpad shot down the drone, you lost. Your manpad didn't shoot down the drone, you lost big.
@zlatkodzakula8626
4 ай бұрын
HRVATSKA je kupila Bradly IFV. jako dobra stvar. ALI MORA KUPITI novi Abrams X Nove Abrams X model je najbolji novi tenk na svijetu. I još 150 komada KF 51 tenk iz Njemačke. ALI novi Abrams X ne ima nosi novi top iz Njemačkig KF 51. kalibar 130mm.
@gusgone4527
4 ай бұрын
@@zlatkodzakula8626 jibber jabber tosh bladder.
@zlatkodzakula8626
4 ай бұрын
@@gusgone4527 CROATIA bought Bradly IFV. very good thing. BUT MUST BUY the new Abrams X The new Abrams X model is the best new tank in the world. And another 150 pieces of KF 51 tanks from Germany. BUT the new Abrams X does not have a new cannon from the German KF 51 caliber 130mm. Croatia must buy new armor. Croatia has a border with Serbia. We know that Serbia is allied with Putin and Russia. This is the reason why he has to buy a new tank. It must defend the EU's eastern borders. (Excuse me for my bad English)
These videos make it look and sound so easy😂
I love my great to great Amrica..❤❤
I saw a couple of them on display at Moscow military museum! They are Russia's toys in Ukraine!
I have been reading the comments to this video, and wondering how many of them were written by Russian bots as their command of the English language is abysmal. 8-)
Hello nice video me being ex u.s. military disability vet I believe highly of the u.s. army
@user-qx6iw3sx2l
4 ай бұрын
Why? What makes you believe in an army that has never won a war on its own since the Mexico war
@MiltonFindley
4 ай бұрын
@@user-qx6iw3sx2l - Politics. Different story on the ground.
@user-qx6iw3sx2l
4 ай бұрын
@@MiltonFindley you need to go get some help or write In your own language as you make absolutely no sense at all 🤯
@MiltonFindley
4 ай бұрын
@@user-qx6iw3sx2l - I wrote a doctoral dissertation and survived several firefights. My guess is that you haven't done either.
It wasn’t built last year, but construction has perfected the weapon!!!
@martinrasmussen7754
4 ай бұрын
Updates...
@Optionsforall
2 ай бұрын
@@martinrasmussen7754 still kicking butt
Issue is there expensive and hard to mass produce. Better to go for cheaper tanks that can be built faster
@tiptoe38
4 ай бұрын
That y America will have a hard time fighting a long war,the cost.
ELECTRIC JAMMERS ARE KILLING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF HIMARS
russian - hold my beer. lol
Buttiful
Vietnamese laughing in corner 😂😂😂😂😂
@tealelliott5052
13 күн бұрын
Vietnamese had to fight from caves never on a battlefield.
HIMARS is bada$$
I do believe that there is s replacement on the way for the Bradly - the M-30 (?). I also think the M-10 Booker has a hybrid drive system to improve fuel efficiency and supply electricity for future weapon systems - lasers. I think lasers will be front and center for future weapons. Also, the US military is actively working to use alternative fuels and reduce fuel consumption. That may give their modern weapon systems very significant advantages.
Cesar❤❤palin😊😊😊😊😊
HOW IS THE VEHICLE ON THE PREVIEW CALLED HELP
Bless America
nice
Only to capture their best tank in Russia
Funny how the Taliban were not impressed with our “high tech” weapons.
@haroldayat2066
4 ай бұрын
Can’t be impressed if you’re ignorant
@rollievancleave7753
4 ай бұрын
@@haroldayat2066well, thank you.
@Bronco46tube
4 ай бұрын
If you had been there you would have realized they were impressed and fearful of our weapons. That's why they rarely made frontal attacks.
@rollievancleave7753
4 ай бұрын
@@Bronco46tube how do you know I was not there? Obviously, they won the war without frontal attacks or high tech weapons. We are the ones who left the battlefield (rightfully so) along with our allies and the Soviets. We had 20 years and numerous troop surges to defeat them and failed to do it. Empires go there to die.
@user-qx6iw3sx2l
4 ай бұрын
@@haroldayat2066no you are the one that is ignorant hahaha
lauriano ondo nsue mangue contra china españa guinea ecuatorial estados unidos africa
These guys made a appearance during the Iraq conflict/war. Now apart from drones, these are arguably the single most important bits of kit on the battlefield.❤❤❤⭐️⭐️⭐️🙏🙏🙏🪬🪬🪬💎💎💎💯💯💯🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
@gilbertsmith3087
4 ай бұрын
That we are allowed to know about at the moment, we all might be surprised in our next war at what the USA put on the battlefield, and in the skies I'm sure of IT. 😮🫨😉🙃🫠😜🤪🫣😅😂😂🫡🫡❤❤
How many fit in a C-5?
@davidkyzer7045
Ай бұрын
3 loaded
Why would cat still make motors for the same government that destroyed them
For mirs than 20 years wnd spent over a trillion dollars putting them more in debt, and still left shamefully leaving behind millions of dollars worth of military equipment for the taliban 😅😅😅.
@stanleydavidson6543
Ай бұрын
Thanks to the biden administration
off no one should do
❤❤😊
😂😂😂😂😂😂good one
Russia maze wachana nao..
Whatever man.
❤❤😊😊😊😊😊😊
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
💛💛💙💙
Changed no game in Ukraina
😲😲😲😲😲😲😲💯💯
We aiant in debt we rich
@ShaneMaere
Ай бұрын
$179000,000,000,000,000.oo
Fort sill
Ukraine must be supported 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🕊️🕊️🕊️📧🕊️🕊️🕊️🙏
@tuyamrong3470
23 күн бұрын
Not yet the time
Lol... looks like a bunch of them just got yeeted in Syria...
usa needs these weapons to keep america great
@itninja7771
4 ай бұрын
A MUCH MORE RIGOROUS K-12 PRIMARY EDUCATIONAL SCHOOL SYSTEM IN ASIA, INDIA, EASTERN EUROPE, AND MANY MORE HAVE made these countries enormously powerful and great. Early RIGEROUS CHILDHOOD EDUCATION MAKES A STRONG country. Not, tattoos, dinted colorful hair, dirty beards, overweight Americans.
@Bronco46tube
4 ай бұрын
The US needs weapons to help keep Democracy alive in as many countries as possible. When did you serve,. What was your MOS? Where did you get you information from? It doesn't't like personal experience.
@wizie01
4 ай бұрын
@@Bronco46tubelet’s be honest, us needs them to bully and oppress other countries 😂 no one is trying to kill democracy, just lies you tell yourself.
@user-qx6iw3sx2l
4 ай бұрын
@@Bronco46tubejust wait a minute the USA does not care about democracy in another country all they care about is their interests and that it
They ran away from afganistan
@T.BJones
Ай бұрын
Should of never went and better they left....2 trillion could of been used better...
After collection evidence of Himars effectiveness in Ukraine, it didn't become a game changer - 10% is not a good number. HIMARS vs Tornado S specs, Tornado s missiles range 120 kilometers and it's much more of them on one vehicle.
Lost war against Afghanistan and Vietnam 😅
I work with the company that makes the steering system.
120mm, not 105 LOL!
@Bronco46tube
4 ай бұрын
Ahh, it was originally released with a 105mm until August of 1985. As of 1985 the M-1A1 went into production with the german made 125 smooth bore cannon. Most of the original M-1's were upgraded.
@dnate697
4 ай бұрын
@@Bronco46tube M256 is a built in America Licensed Copy of L-44 RH 120mm. M-1A1 and M1A2 were tested with the L-55. Tests failed because we couldn't fully stabilize it well enough. The person told me that the rest of the TRIALS are Classified but not top secret or etc, OBTW, the 105mm M-68 is a Lic Copy of the British L-7. I was on Panzer Kaserne in Feb of 1985 when we picked up M1/105mm.
Will it be OK in woods😄
The USA is so powerful but still lost too,2 country that is still in the stone age, what is the use of have so much power ,but can't beat the stone age country,
dapat bumili tayo ng maraming himars raket system sa us para para pang kuntra sa china kapag sumalakay sila mainland ng phl
How comes they're defeated by The Taliban😂😂
... pride goeth before a fall ...
@user-nd7re2sg9w
Ай бұрын
True
The USA army under Biden administration , I don’t think if the himars work 😂😂
The Taliban & Vietnamese will disagree with your title
@antskaljurand3091
3 ай бұрын
We won every battle and politics lost the war not our solders and equipment.
Ok let’s see how it goes in real life 😂
Though we have many faults. We are the government of the people. By the people. For.. The people.... Never again will such a statement be allowed by man in an attempt to govern further a Constitutional Republic of Representative Government.
lauriano ondo nsue mangue contra china españa 2024 guinea ecuatorial estados unidos africa
Vietcong & Talibans 😂😂😂😂 who
We shall find out the whole truth in Ukraine war😂😂😂😂
I'd rather have MLRS.
@tommygun5038
4 ай бұрын
They have both.
@gusgone4527
4 ай бұрын
@@tommygun5038 I know they do and they are complimentary rather than HIMARS replacing MLRS. I watched MLRS letting rip during Desert Storm. Truly awesome kit and that was with the older generation rockets.
@tommygun5038
4 ай бұрын
@@gusgone4527 .....They both fire the same rockets. It's just ones tracked and carries twice the rockets but doesn't shoot and scoot as fast as the himars.
@gusgone4527
4 ай бұрын
@@tommygun5038 I'm well aware of that too. But the selection of projectiles has grown since my time in uniform. MLRS is no slouch when it comes to scooting, trust me. Our local reserve unit has them, 101st Reg, Royal Artillery. Often see them out and about training.
@tommygun5038
4 ай бұрын
@@gusgone4527 ....Any tracked vehicle is going to be more maintenance though.
Then you don't know what happened in Ukraine.
Bla bla bla bla bla bla bla.
The only country that the USA don't want to mess with is vietnam and Afghanistan, this 2 country kick the US ass ,hahaha, lost to a country that is in the stone age,
Fuck
Hahahhahhahah bs
Taliban: hold my goat
Russian and Chinese bots are earning their paychecks in these comments
US army only capable of fighting Yemen militias in the Red Sea. In Ukraine, the weapons supplied by US to Ukraine including Himars have nothing at all against the Russian khinzal and kamikaze Lancet. Even with the Himars in the frontline, Russian army simply pounded them off with Lancet.
@viktorgv7937
2 күн бұрын
what a total BS. Kinzhal was intrecepeted MULTIPLE times by Patriot, proved to be a joke instead on hypersonic missile. Lancet does not run up to 80km, educate yourself. Not even mentioning that S300-400 is TOTALLY incapable of intercepting ATACMS missiles. Hiamars does not not have to be on the frontline. And by the way, Iraq army notest the difference. Read some history.
😂😂 where were those machines in Afghanistan war?
Afghanistan anyone
Sorry but don't mess with the israeli military.
You don't fight alone....you used bait for your war,ex. Is Ukraine fight your own!do not used bait!
"Nobody wants to mess with US army" because the US army is mostly stationed on US territory, which is thousands of miles away from many major power, separated from the world by two vast oceans. And the only times when US army leaves the safety of North American continent is when it attacks some small 3rd world nation where the US military considers its success guaranteed. But, the US military also doesn't want to mess with major powers, such as Russia and China, where its success is not only not guaranteed, but the failure most likely will occur. And failure means defeat. So, tell us more of your pep talk stories 😃))
@jarrettdossey7300
3 ай бұрын
I guess the US army only being on US territory might sound like some tough talk but we love our army and they are backed by the largest militia in the world, bigger than all militaries combined, and if we have to quit our jobs to make tank parts that is what will happen.
😂😂😂 couldn't even beat Afghanistan freedom fighters
@ps9898
4 ай бұрын
Cry 😂
@jerrykelley9266
4 ай бұрын
Lol
@ramiromarquez9716
4 ай бұрын
Freedom fighters ? ? Thouse with sandals that shoots you and then they run and used women and children as Shell ? ? ?
@catrinawilliamson5488
4 ай бұрын
The United States still powerful tho🤪
@ps9898
4 ай бұрын
@@catrinawilliamson5488 Of course the strongest most advanced millitary on earth. I dont even understand how people can compare Russia that still uces WW2 stuff to such a country the US is.. Hell... They compare Russia to NATO XD
U S, the weakest country
Lawanla rusia kalau kau berani...no 1 dalam dunia adalah rusia.
Game-changer,mighty weapon, is in Moscow for exhibition.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣what a joke US is.
Oh really? 😮 But it lost in Korea, then Vietnam. And recently Afghanistan 😅
USA has run away from Afghanistan, you are fighting against Pushtuns and farmers. Against an army that has everything: tanks, rockets, drones, airplanes.