Tell me one war America actually won..away from world wars coz it's a "World war"... Don't search the net it's none America never won a war in it's history
@dw7094Сағат бұрын
So now infantry is armor? These are nothing but drone food. NATO learns nothing from the past.
@watcher57292 сағат бұрын
The new bushmaster gun is rightous too for aerials airburs smart rounds
@veronicalogotheti11623 сағат бұрын
The vikings Vaykeries
@user-tf6nq7xj7q6 сағат бұрын
A piece of junk.
@user-rl6jl4kt3m20 сағат бұрын
Assalomu alaykum Oğo taglavhani o'zbekcha qilib bering iltimos
@anandsonkarji6551Күн бұрын
👓
@WikiWijaya-ul3cmКүн бұрын
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
@WikiWijaya-ul3cmКүн бұрын
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
@a.thiess9005Күн бұрын
I love my Marder Schützenpanzer..!
@ENGBriseBКүн бұрын
Lifesaver
@user-zi4mn6tf1eКүн бұрын
It's absolutely an awesome weapon .
@JorgeLopez-vg2yqКүн бұрын
Sin lugar a dudas, la mejor y más lograda tecnología aplicada en la esfera militar, hasta el día de hoy dígase lo que se diga y pesele a quien le pese, EEUU sigue a la cabeza del desarrollo tecnológico, científico y militar.
@GLEES3452 күн бұрын
You forgot the G6.
@Bean-rt3pp2 күн бұрын
Redback has little to do with K-21.Korea only made the body and suspension. Moreover, since it uses Australian steel and produces it in Australia, there will be little benefit to Korea.
@reinaldo18ful2 күн бұрын
🎯Pelo que vejo na guerra da Ucrânia. Tanques se tornaram obsoletos no campo de batalha, facilmente destruídos por drones e mísseis anti-tanque. Caixões sobre esteiras.
@user-ct5xf2xc3g2 күн бұрын
Bu silahlar olsa ne yazar olmasa ne yazar amerika sadece zayıf ülkelere saldırabilir o yüzden çöp
@pduidesign3 күн бұрын
Star Wars.
@alejomeneziii88223 күн бұрын
Very good invention.
@boerboel3133 күн бұрын
How about prices.
@user-qw9jf8mm8k3 күн бұрын
Exaggerated thats why
@user-bw8qf5vt9p3 күн бұрын
USA number 1 Ha Ha!!😂😂
@billballbuster71863 күн бұрын
Would have been better if the video was slowed down so we could see the vehicles instead of flashing images
@reiniergarcia3 күн бұрын
Still, a lot of people mess with US Army.
@ChrisDianaTravels3 күн бұрын
LOL! The U.S. military is full of idiots that don’t even know what bathroom they should use!!
@frankbock2114 күн бұрын
US propaganda for idiots.
@JunkoSSG-zz5vw4 күн бұрын
wheres the unlimited hydroplane?
@michelletoni30674 күн бұрын
awww, we got a “HATER,” brendansavage, down below 👇🏻 infact, it seems to be a fake account even, how brave…. think just because their given orders to back away, that means something special???
@cliffordbaxter19924 күн бұрын
That's FREEDOM Flying Over ✝️🇺🇸😀😀😀😀😀
@Mike.Muc.3.14155 күн бұрын
I am not impressed. Puma, CV90 or Lynx are obviously better choices. This is all about industry politics. The US corp won with a weaker product line.
@stoyankondov50975 күн бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@davidm70165 күн бұрын
They left out the GAU 19
@craigsavarese86315 күн бұрын
What about the US 50 cal tri-barrel rotary system? The GAU-19.
@SuperMurrayb5 күн бұрын
The videos are interesting but the narration is confusing. Why would an aluminum cartridge case reduce the weight of the "bullet" or projectile? It would make more sense to say it reduced the weight of the entire round, not the "bullet".
@abcdef-qk6jf5 күн бұрын
They had to print new warning labels for the guns: "Don't fart or sneeze while operating!"
@dawolf77845 күн бұрын
It would be nice if you included how many rounds each system is capable of holding. But good overall
@johnhiggs3254 күн бұрын
The magazine capacity is variable for most systems depending on the type of equipment it is mounted on or in. The GAU 8 in a Thunderbolt 2 carries a maximum of 1,200 rounds, but the typical load out is 1,100 rounds. In the Goalkeeper naval short range defense system, the max capacity of the GAU 8 is 1,350 rounds.
@Stefan_Boerjesson5 күн бұрын
Nasty machines those ones......
@NeilHarris-gf4ew5 күн бұрын
The A10 gun is a awsome bit of kit the type that you would not want to meet if you were an enemy tank mad power!
@SynthRockViking6 күн бұрын
What if we have a belt loaded with barrels, and sit on a hill of bullets?
@Stroopwaffe16 күн бұрын
They need to put the avenger cannon on a drone.
@indica85106 күн бұрын
So they just have to get get above the Russian aircraft and use the cannon thing and both aircraft have those. No wonder so many pilots have crashed. So planes are like Star Wars high ground shit.
@Joe-dc2qo6 күн бұрын
What MOS ?
@brianmcdonald45856 күн бұрын
Carzy
@PanioloBee6 күн бұрын
The Gatling gun was used in the late Civil War. Why did it sit dormant until after WWII? Why wasn’t it used in the Korean War? The technology was available to develop it long prior to WWII. It would have been an awesome weapon on the Lockheed P-38 Lightning, or an anti-aircraft weapon coupled to radar.
@BdogFinal146 күн бұрын
The motors necessary to drive modern Gatling guns weren’t available until the late 1950, early 1960s.
@No_Way_NO_WAY5 күн бұрын
Simple answer to your question: it wasnt necessary. Planes were not as fast back then, therefore the time on target was longer. Also the US was sticking to 50cals on planes for a very long time. The germans switched to fast firing auto cannons realatively early.
@No_Way_NO_WAY5 күн бұрын
@@BdogFinal14 motors were available. During the times of the Gatling gun, there were tests made with electric motors. Proving that those operated at a much higher reliability than the hand cranked ones. The batteries are an issue though. Also it wasn't necessary, rather complex to maintain and expensive. Most military developments are as much as necessary as little as possible. Cheap reliable and effective. Only because planes move much faster and have weight issues, the rotary guns are used.
@YakSquad6 күн бұрын
All this military waste. We fought for 20 years in middle east and lost.
@user-xi8sd7ks3n7 күн бұрын
the tank and other vehicles can use a skin
@user-xi8sd7ks3n7 күн бұрын
the skin of the tank can be digital it can change color to match with it's surroundings areas camouflage
Пікірлер
Tell me one war America actually won..away from world wars coz it's a "World war"... Don't search the net it's none America never won a war in it's history
So now infantry is armor? These are nothing but drone food. NATO learns nothing from the past.
The new bushmaster gun is rightous too for aerials airburs smart rounds
The vikings Vaykeries
A piece of junk.
Assalomu alaykum Oğo taglavhani o'zbekcha qilib bering iltimos
👓
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
I love my Marder Schützenpanzer..!
Lifesaver
It's absolutely an awesome weapon .
Sin lugar a dudas, la mejor y más lograda tecnología aplicada en la esfera militar, hasta el día de hoy dígase lo que se diga y pesele a quien le pese, EEUU sigue a la cabeza del desarrollo tecnológico, científico y militar.
You forgot the G6.
Redback has little to do with K-21.Korea only made the body and suspension. Moreover, since it uses Australian steel and produces it in Australia, there will be little benefit to Korea.
🎯Pelo que vejo na guerra da Ucrânia. Tanques se tornaram obsoletos no campo de batalha, facilmente destruídos por drones e mísseis anti-tanque. Caixões sobre esteiras.
Bu silahlar olsa ne yazar olmasa ne yazar amerika sadece zayıf ülkelere saldırabilir o yüzden çöp
Star Wars.
Very good invention.
How about prices.
Exaggerated thats why
USA number 1 Ha Ha!!😂😂
Would have been better if the video was slowed down so we could see the vehicles instead of flashing images
Still, a lot of people mess with US Army.
LOL! The U.S. military is full of idiots that don’t even know what bathroom they should use!!
US propaganda for idiots.
wheres the unlimited hydroplane?
awww, we got a “HATER,” brendansavage, down below 👇🏻 infact, it seems to be a fake account even, how brave…. think just because their given orders to back away, that means something special???
That's FREEDOM Flying Over ✝️🇺🇸😀😀😀😀😀
I am not impressed. Puma, CV90 or Lynx are obviously better choices. This is all about industry politics. The US corp won with a weaker product line.
😂😂😂😂
They left out the GAU 19
What about the US 50 cal tri-barrel rotary system? The GAU-19.
The videos are interesting but the narration is confusing. Why would an aluminum cartridge case reduce the weight of the "bullet" or projectile? It would make more sense to say it reduced the weight of the entire round, not the "bullet".
They had to print new warning labels for the guns: "Don't fart or sneeze while operating!"
It would be nice if you included how many rounds each system is capable of holding. But good overall
The magazine capacity is variable for most systems depending on the type of equipment it is mounted on or in. The GAU 8 in a Thunderbolt 2 carries a maximum of 1,200 rounds, but the typical load out is 1,100 rounds. In the Goalkeeper naval short range defense system, the max capacity of the GAU 8 is 1,350 rounds.
Nasty machines those ones......
The A10 gun is a awsome bit of kit the type that you would not want to meet if you were an enemy tank mad power!
What if we have a belt loaded with barrels, and sit on a hill of bullets?
They need to put the avenger cannon on a drone.
So they just have to get get above the Russian aircraft and use the cannon thing and both aircraft have those. No wonder so many pilots have crashed. So planes are like Star Wars high ground shit.
What MOS ?
Carzy
The Gatling gun was used in the late Civil War. Why did it sit dormant until after WWII? Why wasn’t it used in the Korean War? The technology was available to develop it long prior to WWII. It would have been an awesome weapon on the Lockheed P-38 Lightning, or an anti-aircraft weapon coupled to radar.
The motors necessary to drive modern Gatling guns weren’t available until the late 1950, early 1960s.
Simple answer to your question: it wasnt necessary. Planes were not as fast back then, therefore the time on target was longer. Also the US was sticking to 50cals on planes for a very long time. The germans switched to fast firing auto cannons realatively early.
@@BdogFinal14 motors were available. During the times of the Gatling gun, there were tests made with electric motors. Proving that those operated at a much higher reliability than the hand cranked ones. The batteries are an issue though. Also it wasn't necessary, rather complex to maintain and expensive. Most military developments are as much as necessary as little as possible. Cheap reliable and effective. Only because planes move much faster and have weight issues, the rotary guns are used.
All this military waste. We fought for 20 years in middle east and lost.
the tank and other vehicles can use a skin
the skin of the tank can be digital it can change color to match with it's surroundings areas camouflage
Please increase your technology
Its not combat proven, in any modern battlefield