If you like the video make sure to subscribe. The comment section is always a great read so if you want to add something, go for it. Cheers

@lucasart328

5 жыл бұрын

love the content mate glad youre growing

@dongxx

5 жыл бұрын

Like your British voice

@lucasart328

5 жыл бұрын

@@dongxx sounds more like aussie

@dongxx

5 жыл бұрын

@@lucasart328 really ok

@jongarcia6183

5 жыл бұрын

When you have more than 1k payload of bombs, which is what the mission needs in a small time frame like this, you sacrifice speed. In this type of mission I choose bombers over a ywing that only have a payload of 10 any day Why are we nitpicking stuff like this in star wars? You know what other design looks old? Every ship after the the prequel's timeline. You know what design looks illogical? Millennium Falcon, deathstar. You know what goes down in space for no reason in the past movies yet no one complained? A star destroyer after being defeated. What's my point? SHUT UP AND STOP PRETENDING THIS IS A BIG DEAL!

"Bombers keep that tight formation..." Loses three bombers to a wrecked TIE because of said formation

@TruePacifist201

4 жыл бұрын

Pff... Resistance dumbasses.

@tugkanberk

4 жыл бұрын

Emiel Booth tlj resistance’s skill does NOT match the tfa’s resistance

@spikepachita6026

4 жыл бұрын

They probably just threw that in to get her to say some tactical stuff

@BioGoji-zm5ph

4 жыл бұрын

And what's worse is that they're in SPACE! They could easily attack the dreadnaught from ANY angle, but they choose the one trajectory that makes them the most vulnerable! And whatever happened to those cool Y-Wing bombers from the original trilogy? X-Wings are still around, so why couldn't the Y-Wings get brought back?

@evanforst7272

4 жыл бұрын

Space: has tons of room Rebels: *tight formation*

Y-wings were obviously too effective for the plotline to handle.

@DanS044

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah, like fighter planes WITH bombs? But they are slightly slower than fighters? NO 2 OP pls nerf

@Xiphactinus

4 жыл бұрын

X-83: am I a joke to you?

@aennaenn7468

4 жыл бұрын

BTW, I recently found out they had the audacity to name these abominations "B/SF-17 Starfortress" And it used "gravity bombs" It's a knockoff shittier space version of a B-17 bomber with no onboard defenses. They didn't even come up with an original name, really, they just ripped the idea out of history.

@stringer2295

4 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@aennaenn7468

4 жыл бұрын

@@stringer2295 Seriously, the rebellion OGs would have been like: Oh what now, another slightly different star destroyer? *Laughs in Gold Squadron*

5 years later this movie still goes down as the biggest embarrassment in cinematic history.

@stevemeyer4765

Жыл бұрын

Thanks Robot Head! May your head continue to be ever so robotic!

@aquarius5719

Жыл бұрын

In 2015 fans were put inside a chrysalis of shock and disbelief. In 2017 the chrysalis hatched and fans were turned into a Zerg swarm. TLJ had the first Budlight effect. Toy stores became museums.

@TheH8redd

11 ай бұрын

I beg to differ, Rings of Power has taken the number 1 spot., but SW is still a good 2nd.

@IstandwithIsrael236

7 ай бұрын

rise of skywalker worse lol

@VlazeSkylax

7 ай бұрын

Kind of a bit of a stretch there bud

There is no film-related sentiment I loathe more than, "This movie has (fantasy thing) in it, therefore nothing else in the story needs to be logical, grounded, or self-consistent."

@lordhellstrande7188

2 жыл бұрын

And that's one thing I hate. I like writing fantasy because you don't really have to explain how everything works, but you need to maintain a level of consiatency with regards to stuff like magic

@RSpracticalshooting

2 жыл бұрын

@@lordhellstrande7188 exactly, you don't need to explain how everything works as long as everything appears to work the same way. Consistency is key.

@kacperthegamer4556

Жыл бұрын

It's just the excuse for incompetent morons like ruin johnson to be lazy with their writing

@tornn8847

Жыл бұрын

@@lordhellstrande7188 That summarizes basically any criticism for the sequels! Like they’re just so inconsistent. Like ik Star Wars technology has been stagnant for thousands of years but stagnant doesn’t mean actually going backwards lol

@scottdoesntmatter4409

Жыл бұрын

How about the TIE Fighter being totally blind on the right and left sides?!

Could you imagine if the Dreadnought just started backing up when the bombers approached? Lol

@kingrodney441

3 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@georgy2596

3 жыл бұрын

Nooooo!

@saivinayakdaya4648

3 жыл бұрын

Beep beep beep

@Smerpyderp

3 жыл бұрын

That would be hilarious.

@saivinayakdaya4648

3 жыл бұрын

FireBird Studios beep beep beep

The more you think about this movie the worst it becomes

@lnsullivan422

5 жыл бұрын

Cole Schubert wrong

@johnmontoya8160

5 жыл бұрын

@@lnsullivan422 no. He's right.

@lnsullivan422

5 жыл бұрын

Mfw people hate on things just to hate on them

@erebostd

5 жыл бұрын

@@lnsullivan422 no. They complain about bad decisions made. You have to talk about good things and also bad stuff. And this is not only bad, it's lazy, uncreative and bad.

@lnsullivan422

5 жыл бұрын

Erebos Creativity is entirely subjective. Somewhere in the world of Planet Jacksonville, HelloGreedo is laughing.

They work magnetically in zero gravity using modified rail gun tech? Sure, so why not launch the bombs using that same tech except horizontally from 20km away instead of 50 feet away vertically?

@nikotsapaliaris4919

2 жыл бұрын

It's funny because that's how the Y-wings work!!

@Data-Expungeded

2 жыл бұрын

@@nikotsapaliaris4919 wait really what is this movie

@nikotsapaliaris4919

2 жыл бұрын

@@Data-Expungeded The last Jedi? Sorry I don't really understand what u are asking.

@Data-Expungeded

2 жыл бұрын

@@nikotsapaliaris4919 oh I mean like when someone says what is this in like a what the fuck

@CS_Mango

2 жыл бұрын

Even better. Fly really fast and fling them onto the enemy ship. Just slow enough so they don't get picked up by the shield.

I was so disinterested in Last Jedi that I too wondered how these bomber ships worked. My biggest concern was that these ships are unbelievably unsafe. If one bomb went off, they'd all go off. And then it happened.

@admiralyeet6151

2 жыл бұрын

there are so many ships that could've filled this roll far better

@thatonedude2228

2 жыл бұрын

Plus why didnt the bombs have failsafes, like irl ones have? Why risk carrying an unstable explosive into a battlefield where the main projectiles are superheated plasmabolts.

@86tharmouredregiment

Жыл бұрын

Or the fact that in the movie they appear to be unshielded

@Kevin-np3sx

Жыл бұрын

While i hated these trilogies i did appreciate the asthetic look of alot of the newer tech. I think these bombers were definately impracticle, but if they were faster and combined with a larger fleet would be useful. Like if they had more combined bombing strike capability, as they could be left in the rear until the rebel fleet got in close to distract enemy ships they could perhaps maneuver in above and jetison a full payload but ofcourse more like a firefighting plane drops its water on its target.

@robbythecuban

Жыл бұрын

The bombers were stupid, carrying bombs that were full of stupid. And when the bombs exploded, a massive shockwave of stupidity was propagated through the rest of the movie, making it stupid, and irradiating the whole audience and lowering their collective IQ. All of this “fan-splaining” is deeply ironic, considering that the writers were all so idiotic that they didn’t even think of how the bombers should work, or why they should even exist. It’s just insulting, really.

It wasn’t Poe’s fault that all the bombers were taken out. It was the resistance’s fault for picking bombers that moved slow as fucking slugs instead of the far more agile Y-Wings. Did they seriously think a sizable amount of those bombers could make a successful bombing run and return to the cruiser?

@jacobkleinsasser5658

3 жыл бұрын

REALLY sad part. The y-wings at this point would be like 50+ years old! They were introduced during the clone wars. And even still those aging bombers would have performed better than the sh__ they used.

@Gekk-rx7nv

3 жыл бұрын

Like, in the movie we clearly see that if ANY of them reached their destination they are all doomed

@jessegroen3792

3 жыл бұрын

You know the resistance was pore here right? This is all they had left.

@jacobkleinsasser5658

3 жыл бұрын

@@jessegroen3792 then explain the thousands of ships that rushed to their aid at the end of the rise of Skywalker.

@ct-117

3 жыл бұрын

@@jessegroen3792 but they were funded by the government

George Lucas couldn't write a romantic dialogue even if he was listening to it but he could create a massive, believable world.

@nicholsjoshua15

4 жыл бұрын

I don't know, I like the flirting in The Empire Strikes Back.

@katieshadowsong4665

4 жыл бұрын

Joshua I hate sand it’s coarse and gets every where

@nicholsjoshua15

4 жыл бұрын

@@katieshadowsong4665 For me, that's explainable. Anakin had never really talked to a girl. It's normal for him to be akward.

@katieshadowsong4665

4 жыл бұрын

Joshua I mean yeah but he was also really creepy about it

@katieshadowsong4665

4 жыл бұрын

Anor yeah but it makes some amount of sense because turbolasers have a range due to them just being energy so they’d have to get close at some point

The space battle reminds me of when armies would just stand in lines and shoot each other.

@Sahd079

2 жыл бұрын

I know its 3 months late but that actually makes sense though. This makes no sense at all even in star wars

@panzerhund7836

2 жыл бұрын

British soldiers with muskets

@iamsinistar8971

Жыл бұрын

True but unlike this movie there was a good reason for people to stand in line and shoot at each other.

@throwback19841

Жыл бұрын

​@@iamsinistar8971 yes, and as soon as rifles got better with new technology, they stopped doing it!

@CertifiedRomanGlazerTM

Жыл бұрын

Napoleon moment

4 years later and i still cant wrap my head around "keep that tight formation". like, someone conciously wrote that, assumedly got it proofread, then got it approved for the script, then it was shot and edited, then published with the film, and nobody during that entire process took a moment to think "hmm, why ARE they keeping a tight formation while being swarmed by an enemy squadron? wouldn't that just make them easier to take out?".

@wesleysmith5275

3 ай бұрын

see you put more thought into it during a single yt comment than the entire staff that produced the film. these movies were a shameless cash grab built on the back of the nostalgia and success of the previous movies.

@thespicemasta

2 ай бұрын

During WW2 Heavy Bomber squadrons kept in formations so they could cover each other with their guns. Its such a blatant copy and paste of WW2 tactics 😂.

"Bombers keep that tight formation." Yes thats what we need in a combat scenario all of our ships, that are packed with explosives, close enough that they can blow eachother up with debris from i one another.

@popo0129

3 жыл бұрын

I'm like fairly certain spacing is important even in a real life military scenario. You don't want to give the enemy a lot of chances to take out more than one of you if they have the chance to take something out. Also funny enough, we saw that happen in the movie why spacing is key.

@barrycabbageM34

3 жыл бұрын

Well if we look back to the last time bomber formations were ever really used on mass in aggression 1939-1945 you'll find that bombers usually flew in a close formation, mostly for overlapping fields of fire to mutually support each other in case of an attack on the formation. Plus the bombs within the bombers exploding violently is silly... especially in anything past semi-modern bombs that have reliable safeties that require the bomb to be armed before it would detonate even if it gets hit by a stray round or piece of shrapnel, then adding the reasonable assumption that in with all this fancy technology they have they'd of likely found even safer explosives to use in bombs. not really defending the movie... the scene was a load of shit and could have been so much better.

@popo0129

3 жыл бұрын

@@barrycabbageM34 Curious, wouldn't those bombers be guarded by other attack planes possibly surrounding them? Wouldn't make sense for those bombers to be alone especially if those are the planes that will do some real damage and are meant to blow up bases or sadly at times, cities.

@sebastianvergara8332

3 жыл бұрын

@@popo0129 Bombers flew in formations because that way the would have more firepower against an enemy attack (a B-17 had 5 turrets, usually .50cals, so more bombers = more turrets, and more bombers in a tight formation can form a "wall" of bullets). Despite all that, most estrategic bomb runs were made with an escort of either P-51s or P-47s (American side that is) because enemy fighters and interceptors were a big threath even with 50 turrets to protect yourself. Also keep in mind that these bombings had especific targets, industry, cities, military zones, etc; and the aircaft aproached target at 5-6 km of altittude so that anti air artillery wouldn't be effective. In the scenario the movie gives (some enemy ships aproaching allies) it would have been more efective to load a fighter with ordinance, something the US did during ww2 with almost all of it's fighters. The situation the movie pressents is a military failure, I keep wondering why didn't the First Order just fire all the turrets they had at the slow and big ships that were aproaching them, it also makes no sense to send a ship clearly designed to be used in a controlled airspace in a head-up attack against not only a bigger fleet, but an enemy fleet that has variety such as fighters, interceptors and "anti-ship defenses"

@popo0129

3 жыл бұрын

@@sebastianvergara8332 Yeah that makes sense then. Never knew about the turrets bombers had, that seems like a pretty good solid defense against other planes attacking at least. Yeah this scene had huge problems for me because these bombers did really have nothing for defense like turrets or possibly stronger armor against enemy fire. Just seemed like a giant disaster to happen which, it did end up being. Kind of feels like the writers just watched some scenes of military operations and just threw in stuff to make it sound more tactical and aimed more for visuals than something more logical. I can't remember the scene very well but I feel like one tactic that could have been done was getting most of their shits to attack the front then maybe a small fleet including the bombers flank from another position to bomb them. Even then though, those bombers are super slow so it feels like a vehicle you should just scrap all together lol.

2:12 made me realize that Jango could one-shot that resistance fleet with his seismic charges....

@raider3254

4 жыл бұрын

I forgot that was in the movie

@MrAsh1100

4 жыл бұрын

Anyone could. There's a reason why in Ep 1 showed that what blockades are for, deny any ground in space. Then the ground invasion. There's also a reason why in Ep 5, the Rebels have to fire the ion cannon to disable the SD first before launching any transports. But Rian is so clever. Genius!

@Aredel

4 жыл бұрын

Raider325 That isn’t true. The shockwave is excellent at erasing fighters and lightly-armored units, but it struggles to punch through heavy shielding. The larger ships would shrug off the attack with little to no damage.

@kingpablothe1stoverlordoft871

4 жыл бұрын

@@Aredel idk, seems like it did a pretty good job against those building sized asteroids. I know it's not the same as a shielded capital ship, but still.

@Aredel

4 жыл бұрын

King Pablo the shockwave is good against light armor, but it’s hard countered but medium-heavy shields because of it being a simple shockwave that won’t rattle the structural integrity of an energy shield.

I think the people who defend those bombers forget one thing, one of the most important things in engineering: efficiency. The amount of wasted resources to make bombers like that work when there are other cheaper and more effective options.

@DeutscherPatrick

2 жыл бұрын

Same goes for the Death Stars

@armsarms4207

2 жыл бұрын

cheaper and more effective options being Y-Wings.

@sqwalnoc

2 жыл бұрын

Missiles. done

@DeutscherPatrick

2 жыл бұрын

@@lordhellstrande7188 they were way to expensive. They were only there to bring fear to the galaxy, which failed. And since when is logic a theme in Star Wars anyway?

@MiguelSanchezDelVillar

2 жыл бұрын

@@DeutscherPatrick the idea of a death star is to blow up 1 planet and keep the galaxy under control with fear, It is a good plan, at least in theory, but Palpatine had a massive boner for superweapons, Thrawn already told him that instead of making a death star they could build better tie fighters and more star destroyers to do the same work but better

Thank u for including the Jango Fett scene. The silence leading up to the detination then the sheer power of it will always give me goosebumps

Watching this film is like telling someone who’s never seen Star Wars everything about Star Wars and asking them to make a movie about Star Wars.

@eziosblade3

3 жыл бұрын

Pretty much exactly what happend Roundhead tweeted that he never grew up much of a star wars fan

@randominternetprofile8270

3 жыл бұрын

Similar to the joke that Adam Driver looks like someone tried to draw Keanu Reeves from memory.

@Ealsante

3 жыл бұрын

I wouldn't even say tell everything, since 'everything' would include the Y-wing and B-wing, both highly effective bombers. It's more like giving them a 100-word summary.

@senateifinn7199

3 жыл бұрын

That's literally what happened. Like, you literally typed out The Last Jedi pitch meeting.

@lanefunai4714

3 жыл бұрын

It's like the originals were actual food, and the Kennedy trilogy is vegan and gluten free.

“CAPTAIN! We have enemy bombers incoming” “How long have we got!?” “At that speed, a few days..” “Oh..”

@jacobkleinsasser5658

3 жыл бұрын

Great! That still gives us time for the Annual Snail Races, the Turtle Marathon, and even a cup of tea!

@ivandphantom9028

3 жыл бұрын

@@jacobkleinsasser5658 ARE WE BLIND ???? AIM ALL OUR CANONS ON THE BOMBER!, See it wasnt that hard now the galaxy is ours as I've also captured the resistance in a ray shield

@jacobkleinsasser5658

3 жыл бұрын

@@ivandphantom9028 sir, the snails have taken down the bombers. They want a raise.

@ivandphantom9028

3 жыл бұрын

@@jacobkleinsasser5658 They're better than you lot so yes give them the raise

@jacobkleinsasser5658

3 жыл бұрын

@@ivandphantom9028 umm... Sir... The snails are dead. Our french chef thought they were dinner and cooked them...

"Half a tie fighter can take out three." For some reason I couldn't get enough of that line.

@dragonslayer7724

Жыл бұрын

the funniest part about all this is that, in Lego Star Wars TSS, they're arguably the best ship in the game

@KingKayro87

Жыл бұрын

@@dragonslayer7724 Ironic.

You can get around the problems of magnetic bombs by saying that they're mechanically pushed down on release, but it doesn't make it any more believable that anyone would even use a ship like this. You'd be better off dangling a proton bomb from a fighter and just cutting the line to fling it at the enemy.

@vanthemanproductions9185

Ай бұрын

Literally just Lego Star Wars

I must say that this movie is impressive. Not because it’s good, but because I somehow still manage to find major problems every time I watch it.

@AndrewSmall963

5 жыл бұрын

All part of Disney's plan. You watch the movie in the cinema, and then buy the movie just to watch it multiple times. Car crash clips have more views than wedding videos.

@troyguffey

5 жыл бұрын

Brand NEW major problems?

@peterpetersen6905

5 жыл бұрын

You can watch this shit several times?

@boogiestreet594

5 жыл бұрын

You're listening to the wrong people. Those bombs fell whilst inside a gravitational field obviously generated by the ship. Now, you can't SEE this thing, so it looks like, there's just space RIGHT there OMG SHE's IN SPACEEE, THEY'RE SO STUPID HOW IS SHE ALIVE" She was at the bottom of the stairs, breathing normally etc. So there was obviously gravity inside that bay, Just because you couldn't see a force field to show where the gravity stops, what does that mean? Well, nothing. Look at the original movies, on multiple occasions in the original movies,m such as when palpatine arrives on the first death star, he lands in the hangar, and speaks to vadar, you can clearly see, that ship he was on flew through what appeared to be just a big wide open black entrance. With no masks on etc. Meaning what? Meaning that hangar was using some kind of force field that was generating gravity and air. But you can't see anything over that door can you? So obviously the same thing was happening here she was breathing and ok, so they'd obviusly thought we understoof that just because there's no Blue forcefield or something there, that obviousloy the ship, like other ships in the universe we've seen still have them, you just can't see them. So what does that mean aboput the bombs? Welp, if SHE could fall down really fast and KO herself, Then the bombs could fall right? as they were also in the ships fake gravity field it generated. So now it's easy, with the conservation of momentum theory, obviously, whatever speed those bombs were traveling when they left the gravity field of the ship, they would keep that exact same amount of speed for eternity if nothing was in the way. And thats the truth it's actually embarrassing how many people, i think it's like 95% who think that JUST because there's nothing to show that there's something generating gravity inside the bomb bay of that ship EVEN THOUGH there's a f*cking Ladder there for people to climb down, and manually drop bombs, they MUST be just in open space then?? Again, Other ships in the original star wars films didn't show anything guarding doors out to black space And lastly. About the "ERRRR Her ship flew through snokes ship in lightspeed"""" That is SO retarded, why don't they make bombs with droids blah blah. Thats because these idiots ALL believe (because someone said it and they listened) that during lightspeed/hyperspace, the ship SOMEHOW goes out of existance, goes into some kind of wormhole or something, and then just appears on the other side., When we can clearly hear Han Saying in the first movie "Without precise calculations we could fly right through a star or bounce too close to a supernova and that'd end your trip real quick, wouldn't it?" .. so how do you fly THROUGH a Star, if you're not actually travelling in space but a wormhole, and why can you fly through a star and get killed, but not a ship? ffs

@ubiquitouspanda4466

5 жыл бұрын

@@boogiestreet594 like the guy in the video said: "it's not impossible, it's impractical" For example the gymnastics you're doing to explain how it works shows how impractical it really is

On the bomb, just write: "Hello there."

@p.b.7717

4 жыл бұрын

And 'Dear John'

@dapperfield595

4 жыл бұрын

I would bring out my squadron of B and Y wings and end the movie short if they don’t send a bomb that says “General Kenobi”

@bloodyraptor6251

4 жыл бұрын

That would actually be a cute little Easter egg, but that would require Ryan to actually watch a Star Wars movie

@user-iq8qt7hq7y

4 жыл бұрын

General Kenobi

@KatastOrfeas

4 жыл бұрын

General Kenobi

My favourite detail is that Rian is just ripping dialogue from ww2 footage/movies with no idea what it means. "Tight formation" isn't used for bombers, it's used for fighters - and it's a temporary group-up to allow a more complex maneuver; you wouldn't have fighters remain "tight" for any real length of time.

@JokeeGA5

2 жыл бұрын

I mean bombers used a tight formation too. It was safer that way, but once set upon by enemy fighters, they’d fan out to allow the gunners better field of fire, while minimizing damage from a shot down plane hitting someone else. This movie showed us exactly why. So one tie fighter wouldn’t take out 3 bombers without even meaning to. It’s just stupid.

@Mobius118

Жыл бұрын

Hey, I’m your resident aircraft dork, and while you’re basically completely right, WW2 bombers did use tight formations as it gave them better and mutual coverage from all the bombers guns against enemy fighters. Fighters themselves only fly tight formation outside of combat, as when in combat a sort of combat spread has usually been more effective, with fighters anywhere from half a mile to multiple miles apart until engagement

Why don't they point their bomb bay towards the target and release the payload frontally instead of needing to hover the target? After all, a single bomber's load killed the Dreadnought - they could have launched a moving minefield against their whole fleet instead of killing themselves.

@HeyAddieImTojo

Жыл бұрын

And still people defend that piece of garbage movie when this is one of the smaller problems it has.

@Nullifyer11

Жыл бұрын

Why not lunch the attack from above the ship they are trying to bomb. Have the bombers pull up and release the payload when they reach the "minimum distance". I'm not trying to defend these ships but space is 3D!

@richardmartin4965

Жыл бұрын

because the bombs hit the reactor of the dreadnaught, that is the only reason they destroyed that ship, what irks me more is when they try to justify pulling up Poe by saying that those bombers and crews were an expensive loss, hmm, lets take the cost of the dreadnaught and its crew and ancillary staff and all its payload, the squadron of Ties, pilots, stormtrooper contingent, the fact it was used to erase cities from orbit.... so basically 53,000 officers, 140,000 enlisted personnel, and 22,000 stormtroopers and a monster of a ship. Compare that to losing 20 bombers...... I personally think i would be ordering those ships in every single time.

@adenosine2electricboogaloo647

Жыл бұрын

THRAAAAWWWNN we need you!!!

@GeneticFreak

8 ай бұрын

Funny enough old X wing and Tie fighter games use this logic when we use proton bombs. They are big can launch and move very slowly in a straight line, so just approach in vertically from above capital ships and shoot it straight ahead

I hate Disney... Its Course and Rough.....And Ruins everything

@jarjarbinks4368

4 жыл бұрын

Yousa no ani

@CygnusTheSilly

3 жыл бұрын

General kenobi you are a moron but this time you're right enjoy the feeling as much as you can because you will ever be right again

@the_vortex__1738

3 жыл бұрын

Me too

@carsin9067

3 жыл бұрын

Correct u are

@Blorgus.

3 жыл бұрын

Yea disney ruined my life and star wars and everyone who works for disney should die because of the desing of this bomber

"The bombs are magnetic." Ok, so they should attach to the nearest metal object, right? Then they should attach to the bombers... Awesome design, 10/10 kamikaze pilots approve.

@Smerpyderp

3 жыл бұрын

I think they were talking about rail gun type stuff, or Gauss guns. You know, electromagnetism pushes the bombs out, rather than the bomb itself being magnetic.

@soupchewer9213

3 жыл бұрын

@@Smerpyderp i havent thought of it but then wouldnt the bombs crash with each other if that happens?

@mintgoldheart6126

3 жыл бұрын

@@soupchewer9213 staged activation can be a thing.

@petriew2018

3 жыл бұрын

@@Smerpyderp so why the hell would you design it to shoot 'down' instead of forward? You're in space, you have no benefit in 'dropping' them. A forward firing rail system has the advantage of range and greater penetration, as the projectile would continue to accelerate in null gravity (nothing is slowing it down), actually increasing it's effectiveness with range. And greater speed at point of impact equates to a greater release of potential energy, making them more effective a forward firing configuration would give you better manuverability, since you just have to point the nose of the bomber at the target for a few seconds to launch the payload... you wouldn't have to slowly fly over a potentially moving target that probably doesn't want to make your job easy.... basically those bombers are designed to make life as difficult for their crews as possible, instead of taking advantage of the conditions of space combat to make themselves more effective. They're laughably slow and forced to get within suicide range to be of any use, however they're supposed to actually 'drop' their payload. 'magnetism' is a really shit answer to the problem Rian's laziness created. Star Wars needs to start hiring some actual professional science fiction writers if it actually wants to patch these plot holes. This is really basic knowledge to anyone who's read hard scifi.

@thedoomrunnerxl

3 жыл бұрын

The bombers are made of PLA right out of a giant 3D printer, so nothing magnetic. Makes perfect sense. Especially if you drink before thinking about it.

What do you expect from a movie that had Leia going EVA in her lounging around clothes? There are no words for this film that accurately describe its enormous amount clusterfuckery. I literally hate Johnson and Kennedy. 😠

@dragonslayer7724

2 жыл бұрын

Rian Johnson isn't complete garbage at what he does. He directed some of the Season 5 Breaking Bad episodes (I think). But, yeah, his job in the Last Jedi was sub-par, to say the least.

@nuclear4569

2 жыл бұрын

@@dragonslayer7724 Plus knives out directed by Johnson was good

@aquarius5719

Жыл бұрын

Automate Rian Johnson.😂 AI will do a better work.

I'm so glad someone else noticed how dumb it was to have bombs falling in zero gravity. I also wondered why they had these things going so slow and only approaching from one angle.

They're Actually : Why-Wings...

@arbanafal

5 жыл бұрын

G'd I hate you; this is brilliant and it ruined Y-wings for me.

@jrickducking6685

4 жыл бұрын

That plot twists got me surprise

@someoneman4732

4 жыл бұрын

The Y-Wing made sense tho. It was plasma bolts being projected forward

@frens_till_the_end

4 жыл бұрын

I mean, freaking Tea Wings would have been better than this.

@leifashley

4 жыл бұрын

LMFAO

The Clone Wars Era has always seemed more advanced than its successors. Both the Republic and Separatists were extremely innovative. And then there’s star killer base. Another Death Star that’s simply bigger. Oh boy, big surprise they were able to blow it up. It’s almost like I’ve seen that before, *twice*. Personally the newer movies lack originality, and where they do try and get original, they screw with lore.

@ph89787

4 жыл бұрын

The originals have the excuse of being filmed in the late 70s and early 80s. Also I’m imagining the clones watching this scene somewhere either laughing their arses off. Or cringing at what the hell is going on.

@ericshawn3169

4 жыл бұрын

Having Starkiller Base be destroyed in the same way the first two Death Stars were was insane. 30 years later and they can’t fucking make it without a bullseye in the middle that doubles as a self-destruct button. It’s aggravatingly retarded

@EpicGamer-fl7fn

4 жыл бұрын

well it is a technology purely for war we are talking about here. It's logical that during pretty much the biggest galactic-scale conflict in the history both sides would have an arms-race and try to come up with the most destructive and powerfull war machines and ships. Just look at Malevolance for example. Hell it was one of the main topics of discussion in the republic senate at that time if they should sacrifice more budget for the war or not. It's just more needed in times of war. During the Empire they didnt had to try anymore, they still did some cool shit from time to time but overall they mostly used the same technology they used in Clone Wars, if not worse ones to cheapen a mass prodcution. They didnt have to be creative anymore, The only real threats that were left to fight against were rebel cells that had very poor equipment and planets that are opposing the Imperial occupation. That's why pretty much all Clones seen Stormtroopers as inferior with their cheap armor, shit training that revolved around brain washing them into loyality and crappy blasters. Rex has no respect for them in Rebels, he even shows that despite being old he can take a fuckton of them without suffering a single scratch. As for New Republic era, they demilitarized themselves so it COULD explain why the bombers here might infact be really fucking outdated pieces of technology, but dont take my word for it im basically writing fanfiction here, i just assume that those two things might be closely connected to each other. All though if they are modern the holy fucking shit did Johnson even seen Clone Wars? Anakin Skywalker crashed an entire Cruiser into a separatist command, destroying the entire Ryloth blocade with just one empty ship. Separatists wanted to do something simular later in the war by sending a republic cruiser filled with fuel tanks into a meeting place for commanders and generals, and if they would succeed at detonating it in a right spot then everyone in that meeting place would be dead as fuck. AND STILL despite them failing to do that they managed to still take a few cruisers with them when it exploded too soon. God you can excuse the technology but you cant excuse the absolute stupidity of those grown ass people in the movie. It's just not excusable

@pr6897

3 жыл бұрын

@@EpicGamer-fl7fn the melavolence was fucking op I mean just have a buncj of those and to take out the ships and then send in ships with powerfull canons to destroy them

@TheBelrick

3 жыл бұрын

The first two series were made by men who love the universe they made. The latest series is made by feminine types who hate men and wanted to show why on film

I was watching this scene and the only thing I could think was, “Don’t destroyers have guns on them? I why not just use them?” And also, any ship, or plane, or anything, that has a 100% casualty rate is NOT WELL DESIGNED!!! They should’ve at least had some sort of shield system to justify the bulky size and slow movement, but no let’s just make the payload twice the ship size, place the bombs right on the walls with no room between them, make the bomb holders loose enough so that they can bang into each other before being deployed, AND, ON TOP OF ALL OF THAT, NO SHIELDING!!!!!

8:10 - the generic elevator music fixed the bombing scene. Last Jedi is finally the comedy it was meant to be. (*Sarcasm*)

How would those ships even be able to dock in the hanger?

@marlkarx9853

4 жыл бұрын

If they would, they would probably dock at a wall like the tie fighters do. But they all died so why come up with an idea. This movie is just garbage

@realjenkinscannonball

4 жыл бұрын

They crash

@ManofElements

4 жыл бұрын

They don’t once you leave the hanger, you leave life

@thatkeyboardgirlsha3442

4 жыл бұрын

@@ManofElements but how were they IN the hanger in the first place

@luckyblockyoshi

4 жыл бұрын

@@thatkeyboardgirlsha3442 woooosh

"Captain, the bombers are approaching, what is your command?!" "Try spinning, that's a good trick!"

@khosrowzare8301

4 жыл бұрын

"Bring me some popcorn and a chair. This will be fun to watch!" "Aye Aye! Admiral!"

@mrbyzantine0528

4 жыл бұрын

@@khosrowzare8301 *Dreadnought spins* "Sir! The dreadnought is rolling over!" 'Well fuck, a whole ten minutes wasted." *TIEs come in and hit mid-pack bomber only, causing a ricochet self-destruct* Tie Pilot "And to think our ships were never **that** bad!"

@birmandragon1495

4 жыл бұрын

The sad thing is, spinning probably would have worked.

@johntheknight3062

4 жыл бұрын

Try just throw some random stuff at them, they have no abbility to avade this.

@baianinhooreidasinuquinha4312

4 жыл бұрын

*Instantly gets a triple kill*

Y-wings are superior bombers. They are maneuverable, can carry heavy loads, and are probably a lot cheaper than these monstrosities.

The Empire might have been inspired by Nazi Germany but the space battles are more so inspired by the naval battles that took place between the US and Japan, which is why you have destroyers, frigates, corvettes and battleships, and larger capital ships which launch fighters like a naval aircraft carrier. The thing is, these battles did include bombers, but not slow moving fortress bombers which bomb large land targets, but fast moving dive bombers. Dive bombers are probably what Lucas had in mind with the Y-wings.

They also missed the chance to call the bombers T wings.

@Thomas-te2lg

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, that was their original name too.

@verdant229

2 жыл бұрын

I think they should of been named L-Wings. Because they’re just a massive loss of credits.

@MariOmor1

2 жыл бұрын

@@verdant229 No, T-wings still suit them because they're *T* rash

@scotthodgins7975

2 жыл бұрын

But then the obvious joke would be "we just t-bagged that Star destroyer"

@michelecastellotti9172

2 жыл бұрын

@@MariOmor1 oh shit BURN, BURN

Ryan: So I’ve come up with these WW2 inspired space bombers they deliver a massive payload but they are incredibly heavy and clunky which makes them super slow. Lucasfilm creative teams: why wouldn’t the resistance use tried and true Y-wings? Ryan: what’s a Y-Wing?

@norfangl3480

4 жыл бұрын

"Why wings? What do you mean why wings? Wings aren't needed in space"

@njmvcsp2575

4 жыл бұрын

Y wings? We can't get no Y wings! No matter how you try to spin this or explain it its just too stupid

@thatkeyboardgirlsha3442

4 жыл бұрын

don't you want slow bombers with nice jazz music playing as they slowly cruise towards the Dreadnaught? say no more fam. *Fires John Williams

@benoomen7678

4 жыл бұрын

I miss b-wings...

@enderhero6812

4 жыл бұрын

Y wings would ve outdated being 50 years old vut i would still take a bromen y wing over a carppy ship that a disfunctional tiefighter can take out 3 of

Prior to the bombers, you had Poe delaying the enemy fleet with a prank phone call. Within the first 5 mins of the film, Rian Johnson broke Star Wars. Plus all the protagonists are sitting in a time out, taking back seats to supporting characters, during 89% of the movie.

That's another thing that bugs me. When Rey is using the turret to destroy the TIE Fighters and she gives an "Whoo, I like this." They have everyone do that whenever they do something we haven't seen them do. Not something we haven't seen. Just something we haven't seen them do. Rey likes shooting the gun. In Force Awakens Poe gets all excited at how fast a TIE Fighter can go...then again in Last Jedi when his X-Wing has that booster rocket. Finn gets excited shooting TIE Fighters multiple times and really just says "WHOO" at almost anything he sees. Han is inexplicably using Chewie's Bowcaster for the first time and actually turns to him and says he likes it which makes me absolutely crazy. Why do they always have to draw out attention to the fact they're doing a new thing and they're happy about it. This kind of technology is common place in Star Wars. Why are they always shouting their excitement for things that should be old hat by then?

It really does seem like technology in star wars is going backwards...

@AlbertoDsign

4 жыл бұрын

It feels like we only go bakwards, darling

@tikibob3339

4 жыл бұрын

Perzonic Fly warhammer 40k?

@haruyanto8085

4 жыл бұрын

Lol the whole franchise is going backwards

@haruyanto8085

4 жыл бұрын

@Ryan Allison Except even in the real world that isn't the case, war times have developed some of the best and most important inventions

@megagnura7804

4 жыл бұрын

@Ryan Allison The star wars universe has planets more resources available and real wars have been the cause of immense technological progress due to the arms race that war creates.

5:02 "Look how happy she is. Everyone's about to die". She's a Palpatine, alright.

@Inaros404

3 жыл бұрын

This comment is underrated 😂

@PottoChip

3 жыл бұрын

Overrated

@fulconini

3 жыл бұрын

8:22 smiley bomb:(

what really gets me is that in prequels movies that were set before everything the ships were more advanced

@longfineel2630

2 жыл бұрын

It WORKS with the OT because well… it’s a fascist empire, not much advancement would actually happen, and of course tech is not prioritised. It does not work when it is a good few decades after the OT and the government isn’t suppressing everything.

I'm still puzzled at how their bombs actually dropped - nice and straight, right down onto the target... in space... with no gravity to pull them down or even cause them to fall out of the bomber to begin with. The first explosion would have flung the rest of them out into space in every conceivable direction.

@icecold9511

2 жыл бұрын

Or just detonate them. I get the idea they didn't understand that falling bombs scattered. Bombs falling in this make sense. Easily explainable. Them being useful....doesn't. It was just shitting on the man to make the two women look like experts, while he looks like he has no good sense at all. Then again, the women's battle plan was to run to a safe place and then yell for help. Even when trying to make women superior, they channeled a female stereotype. I wonder if Kathleen ever realized what she did?

@TheRodentMastermind

2 жыл бұрын

Well the ship does have gravity, so just leaving the ship would give them inertia. That's if the rails themselves weren't designed to accelerate them.

@BD-yl5mh

2 жыл бұрын

Ok, ffs, the thing about this whole argument that has always pissed me off is that the bombs follow the laws of physics perfectly fine, and no one could get their fucking heads around it. This is to say nothing for the quality of the movie, but genuinely, the way those bombs are released, that is how they would fall. Like 100%, that’s real world physics. They are pushed out at a set velocity, and then they maintain that velocity. They’re in space, that’s how physics works. In effect, the ship itself is just a machine gun with a very low muzzle velocity, and because there’s no atmosphere, or gravity, once the bombs leave the end of the “gun” they neither accelerate or decelerate which is why they maintain their formation and move at the same speed, and therefore stay in the same formation as they fall

@rhyscallinan5058

Жыл бұрын

I can just imagine them falling, and as soon as one explodes all the rest either explode or repel out like an explosion of bombs, wiping out everyone. But yeah the system doesn't make sense. Gravity is different in space and normal atmosphere. So the moment those bombs go, they'll slow when they go outside the gravity of the inside. Basically knocking them back in or even causing an explosion inside. Also magnets don't work because they'll just stick to the rails.

@stevenschnepp576

Жыл бұрын

​@@rhyscallinan5058 What acts upon them to slow them down once they're in the microgravity environment outside the deathtrap bomber? Look up the myriad ways magnetic launch systems get around that problem. You don't need to leave the electromagnet on.

rotten tomatoes critic rating: 91 percent rotten tomatoes audience rating: 41 percent the agenda is clear

@tumult04

4 жыл бұрын

But then gave rise of Skywalker 52 percent. I wonder what was so different for them..

@opprime8778

4 жыл бұрын

@@tumult04 it was clearly just a bad film

@soarinskies1105

4 жыл бұрын

Rotten Tomatoes is so fucking out of touch

@jamesm9789

4 жыл бұрын

What? The. Heck? How did Episode 8 get such a high score? It's worse than trash. It's an abomination of the movie. At leas the audience rating is low. Honestly, the only reason I can come up with it getting such a high score is that it was rigged. Maybe Rian Johnson or Kathleen Kennedy paid them off?

@Asterra2

4 жыл бұрын

@@jamesm9789 RottenTomatoes can pick and choose which reviewers to add to their aggregate. For starters, the tendency of movie reviewers is to blindly champion anything that pushes certain politics. RottenTomatoes is fully on board with this-there's an article that talks about their endeavors to specifically add more reviewers who think that way, and they have made several conspicuously selective edits to review scores-so the result is what you get there. Metacritic is more reliable, in that they haven't done the extra legwork to find politically-driven reviewers the way RT has. This doesn't stop reviewers from being largely of that mind in the first place, but it does mean Metacritic's critic score is less deliberately skewed. See for yourself.

Star destroyers sitting around doing nothing. Po flies up next to them to have a conversation. Then leisurely flies around shooting turrets. This is such mediocre writing.

@bigrichard232

5 жыл бұрын

skeletorrobo Mediocre is such an overstatement... you are giving Rian Johnson too much credit

@skeletorrobo

5 жыл бұрын

@@bigrichard232 well, technically it was such mediocre writing, but ok... Such abysmal writing.

@WalterLiddy

5 жыл бұрын

Oh no - you don't understand. See, he's the greatest pilot in the galaxy. We know this because when he does stuff that other people die doing, he doesn't die.

@skeletorrobo

5 жыл бұрын

@@WalterLiddy Kindly the misunderstanding is all yours. If you've ever seen A New Hope you may recall the assault on the Death Star. No time for curtsies and tea time conversation . The stakes of life and death were real, where speed and timing were paramount. That was what made SW a phenomenal hit in 1977. And a phenomenal hit in 2017 is not what we subsequently got.

@MattR8605

5 жыл бұрын

Each of those capital ships has it's own bunch of fighters it could deploy. NONE of them decided to do so even when those stupid bombers showed up. Also, Poe would have and SHOULD have been killed immediately upon flying up to the ship to start trolling.

3 years later and this is still gold. Some honest LOL moments. Great content

They always use the same excuse everytime we point out something obviously wrong. “Oh it’s about space wizard and laser swords but apparently THAT(insert problem we talking about) is unrealistic”

There’s nothing funnier than people who still defend this movie 🍿

@TraustiGeir

5 жыл бұрын

@Iron Giant You only say that because you crashed in Maine during the 50s.

@konstantinotrembsky9966

4 жыл бұрын

@@TraustiGeir n1

@jonvontrapp9532

4 жыл бұрын

There's nothing funnier than grown adults complaining about something that isn't even fucking real

@Bollibompa

4 жыл бұрын

@@jonvontrapp9532 Are we not allowed to feel passion for media we consume? What are you? Some kind of boring fucking tool?!

@Korijenkins1414

4 жыл бұрын

​@@Bollibompa no but people clearly have an obsession with attacking this film, and feel the need to harass anyone who liked it. (Note: They did not do the same thing to those who liked The Phantom Menace or Attack of the Clones, both terrible films with horrific CGI in Attack) I'm neutral, but that is incredibly fucking obvious.

They killed the wrong sister.

@snoop4470

5 жыл бұрын

Javy no doubt fucking rose I hate her so much.

@jarbinks5

5 жыл бұрын

Lol yeah

@Whiteshell204

5 жыл бұрын

@@snoop4470 haha so do I..I hate that slant

@MAXLD

5 жыл бұрын

Actually they didn't... because to force the "even the weakest dork nobody can become a hero" lame bullshit down kids throats (which is the whole purpose of this trilogy), the stronger sister had to die so it could inspire her nobody dork sister to become a hero and save one of the main characters... because "love triumphs against hate" kid of bullshit... + to become his love interest, because romance it's a crap that has to be in any generic audience movie so it makes the sentimental portion of the women audience feel satisfied when exiting the theater. It's just another tick in the usual Hollywood's cliché checkbox. Every step of the movie is to prove that initial point. That's why Rey's parents are irrelevant, because you don't have to be descendant from a strong Force character, you don't have to be someone of status. You can be the poorest piece of garbage in the galaxy and still be strong (bonus if you're also "... with the force") and go out there fight evil. That's why the Resistance will thrive now... because poor bastard slaves will now feel inspired to overcome the oppression and whatever. It's all about the old "hope" factor... Long story short: this is the overused plot of weak becomes strong against evil, which is relatable to the common folk out there. And what did these 2 movies (so far) did for the Star Wars story franchise? Absolutely nothing. It was a rehash from the previous SW movies (specially the original 3) and that makes them nothing more than "nostalgia fan service".... specially Force Awakens, god, that was shameless copy-paste to make old fans go into hyper ventilation mode after so many years. And the next one probably won't do much more than that. Rogue One was the only proper SW movie recently and is still was about old loose ends. At least it did it properly. Solo was just stupid and a fan "compensation" for the death of Han in Force Awakens nobody asked for... and when they did it, they failed miserably. Obi-Wan with Ewan McGregor was the one people wanted, but if it would to be made like Solo... well, I guess we dodged a bullet... Star Wars has an entire galaxy of stories to tell, and there's plenty of other things people want to see, they want new Star Wars. Can't wait for this Skywalker story to be finally over... If they plan on doing something with Obi-Wan/Ewan, better be a TV/streaming show, because the movie standards are just too limiting to make good non-generic material.

@christiancrusinberry7098

5 жыл бұрын

"wrong kid died" - Pa Cox

A wholehearted thank you for this video 🙏🏻

Beautiful work my man!

Magnetic mines would either clump together or repel each other and scattered depending on whether they are all different or the same polarity

@lolgamer6549

2 жыл бұрын

No no, he has a point 😂👌🏻

@icer1249

2 жыл бұрын

They also wouldn't of "dropped" anywhere given the ship there in is also metal.

@silentkhaos1176

2 жыл бұрын

@@icer1249 "BuT iT hAs AnTi-MaGnEtIc MeTaL!"

@peganin442

2 жыл бұрын

@@icer1249 that's what I was thinking, I mean, how stupid can some people be

@KingSlayer_.

2 жыл бұрын

Lol what's stopping the bombs from connecting to the closest metal there is? (i.e your own fucking ship😂)

I genuinely believe that Rian Johnson had absolutely no idea what he was doing

@DivineBloodline

4 жыл бұрын

He didn't, but he thought he did, that was the problem. He probably thinks he made the best Star Wars film to date, and it was a cinematic masterpiece.

@swaelee4686

4 жыл бұрын

@@DivineBloodline it was very pleasing to the eye however, very shit movie indeed

@mrspeigle1

4 жыл бұрын

@Frithiof Mårtensson 8a yeah let's make something massive and slow completely unshielded despite Rebel ships being heavily shielded being established Canon. Oh and make it use bombs instead of proton torpedoes which were also established Canon.

@mkh1688

4 жыл бұрын

He writes movies like he dresses himself. Lazy, sloppy, and wimpy.

@opqrrg

4 жыл бұрын

Luckly JJ Abrams and Katheleen Kennedy did a great job!! TFA was a masterpiece and TROS fixed everything RJ did!!

Brilliant. Keep making amazing vids!

They want the plot to be "Up close and personal" so you can actually see what's going on, but the problem with that is that in order to do so, you need to induce a limiting factor to "long range bombardment". The OT had a fairly reasonable one: the death star was too thick, and the one weakness was too small to hit at a distance. Once you've got weapons that don't dissipate over long distances (like Hyperspace kinetic bombardment), close range combat becomes absolutely baffling; and as far as I know, the only effective limit to the range of hyperspace torpedoes is the abilities of their targeting system. On a tangent, Japan's Gundam series specifically introduced an element that drastically limited sensor range and communications; which meant up close and personal was basically the only way to fight.

1. The bombs look like they're free-falling and not accelerating as they should, if they were magnetic. 2. Magnets only work from *very short* distances. 3. If the bombs are magnetic, why didn't they attract each other and explode right after being "dropped"? 4. If the bombs are magnetic, that surely should've affected the way they're attached to and released from the bombers, who are also presumably metal? Instead they're rattling about in their cartidges even after being "activated".. 5. I shouldn't be bothering with this dumbass popcorn movie.

@YAH93

5 жыл бұрын

@Lai Derrick No, by acceleration Just like Dudelve said

@KaosNova2

5 жыл бұрын

Statement: Certain metals are repelled by magnets, plus identical magnetic poles repel each other.

@YAH93

5 жыл бұрын

@@KaosNova2 Statement: that is not enough to excuse this shitload of a scene.

@KaosNova2

5 жыл бұрын

@@YAH93 Statement: I agree.

@YAH93

5 жыл бұрын

@Tom Arrow But how are the higher-flying magnets getting magnetized to the ships sufrace in the first place? Between them and the ship are dozens of other magnets.

I just started watching the Clone Wars animated series and I have to say the story is much more well written than in these sequels. Even though they were meant for younger audiences, there's much more heart in those "cartoons" than in these huge colossals

@blizzit1211

3 жыл бұрын

The clone wars is on the extreme side of meant for kids. lol

@Thundertron5

3 жыл бұрын

@@blizzit1211 at the start TCW was meant for a younger audience. The stories, animation quality, characters were Childish with lessons for children to learn. It starts changing mid season 3 and by the end of Season 7 any age can enjoy it immensely

@blizzit1211

3 жыл бұрын

@@Thundertron5 True

@YeabuddyXD

3 жыл бұрын

It literally aired on cartoon network... duh it was made for a younger audience. Doesn't undermine a damn thing about them whatsoever though. They were created to enhance the prequels, and George was giving the green light all around. The guy that created Star Wars for kids. Of course they have heart! Along with that, they're chock-full of lore, character development and actual answers that fit into the overall tapestry of a story. Fuck Disney

@nickkurzy2246

3 жыл бұрын

"Meant for kids" Flamethrower clone: What?

The bomb acts as a projectile, and explodes on impact. This is like the same exact thing as every laser, from the deathstar weapon to just a little stun. What are the differences? Oh! Well with these bombs, we’re gonna make them go out the bottom of the ship exclusively!! Forget about the technology of having multiple blasters on the ship with aiming systems. They’re also physical, so they can be destroyed unlike a laser!!! I guess the justification would be that the bombs have so much negatives, to counteract the massive explosive damage they’d do over other Star Wars weapons. But I call bullshit, it’s just obsolete in every way

@thatonedude2228

2 жыл бұрын

Well bombs would be more effective than lasers when going against shields, but they flew under the shields so that doesnt make sence, But bombs do have way more destructive potential than lasers in small packages, but since bombs are stupid they developed missiles/torpedos which can also be aimed after firing, plus they can have different warheads like proton torpedoes which disable shields. TL:DR bombs are stupid use missiles instead like every other star wars bomber

8:46 : so you're telling me that this ship is a kamikaze one anyway, as the payload will damage it on explosion, has the capability to pull out the most effective kamikaze attack ever shown in a star wars movie, and chooses to creep slowly, losing most ships uselessly, and on success just sending a few low power bombs? wow, that makes so much sense! Or you could keep all but one in reserve, and send one as kamikaze...

This movie is the worst one ever done, but the bashing videos are masterpieces. This one is art.

@samueljohnson9723

4 жыл бұрын

Yes I never get tired of ripping this movie

@RenTran1

4 жыл бұрын

Worst Star Wars movie, or movie in general?

@DonVigaDeFierro

4 жыл бұрын

@@RenTran1 Worst Star Wars. There are worse movies in general.

@NameCallingIsWeak

4 жыл бұрын

"the bashing videos are masterpieces. " - This is the best they could come up with TWO VERSIONS OF HI - Like ... THE GROUND - A shaved orangutan would be more creative ... - 3 ships that could actually get to their target ... and back again

@pcvl9637

4 жыл бұрын

OH shut up its not the best star wars movie but its a good movie

Fun fact: this bomber carries 1000 bombs, an Y wing can carry 20 What’s my point? They seriously replaced 50 really good spaceships for this space coffin?

@thiccchungo1041

3 жыл бұрын

And a newer version of the Y-Wing probably could carry more payload, making those shit bombers look even worse

@Kreschavier

3 жыл бұрын

Plus, proton torps are so much more explosive.

@chiserge1

3 жыл бұрын

To be fair, they may not have 50 pilots to fly all those Y wings. Leia was pissed at losing 12 bomber crews. Granted, if all they are doing is flying straight, level, and dropping bombs at a specific point in time, why not just use droids, right?

@0815Snickersboy

3 жыл бұрын

That's a common strategy in the star wars universe. Putting all your resources in a few very large ships to create a huge single point of failure. The death star in episode 4 had the same issue. They could have built 10000 star destroyers and spread them all across the galaxy. But no they have built a huge ball that could be destroyed by a few x wings instead. So then in episode 6 they did the same mistake again to then repeat it in episode 7. So in episode 8 the good guys fell for the trick and thought this was a good thing to do. Put all you resources in a few expensive weapons to concentrate your risk at one point.

@imdumbbut1681

3 жыл бұрын

@@0815Snickersboy They already had thousand of Star destroyers tho, the Death Star wasn’t all of their resources. That’s why the empire didn’t immediately collapse after the first Death Star exploded. Tbh, the empire would probably be still going strong and be able to build a third Death Star if the Emperor hadn’t died in the destruction of the second one.

THANK YOU! ive been making the "why did tech not change from OT to ST....shit changed big time between PT and OT" argument forever and no one has ever validated it before this video.

I love you, keep up the good work

Even if the argument was "they had to slip under the shields to bomb it" Y-wings were purpose built exactly for that role

@thatonedude2228

2 жыл бұрын

haha proton torpedo go boom

@Victor-056

Жыл бұрын

Also, rather certain that with only a few modifications to the Y-Wing, it could fire those ridiculous "Magnetic bombs" out their cannons... With more efficency.

@CertifiedRomanGlazerTM

Жыл бұрын

Y-wings are one of the fastest starbombers to be used, *Maybe* second to Hyena bombers used by the Seperatists during the clone wars

@TheMilitantMazdakite

5 ай бұрын

Yeah, and as for the arguement that the Starfortress has a payload 50x that of the Y-wing, the K-wing can fufill this desire while having a comparable speed to the Y wing. Hell, it has a QUAD TURBOLASER! ON A STARFIGHTER! As a bonus, this would please fans of the EU, like me. HAD DISNEY NOT AXED THE WHOLE THING!!!!

If they wanted a ww2 inspired bomber aircraft, what about taking inspiration from a naval torpedo bomber, like the TBF Avenger? You know, an aircraft DESIGNED to attack ships!

@lanefunai4714

2 жыл бұрын

It's the fault of tactics. Big @$$ slow bombers (B-52) are still used, but only if your forces have air superiority, meaning the enemy can't do $#!+ to stop you. Otherwise, you use nimble multi-role craft or stealth bombers. It seems nobody at Disney thought to ask anyone with any knowledge to sanity check the plot.

@exobyte317x7

2 жыл бұрын

Or even better the mosquito a plane that could have half a wing and engine gone and still fly at max speed faster than pretty much any fighter

@Jedislayer19

2 жыл бұрын

@@lanefunai4714 I was thinking the same damn thing when I saw the movie. I'm no expert- I've only played games and seen war documentaries and the like- but even I knew it was a stupid idea.

@selectivepontification8766

2 жыл бұрын

It's even sadder that the very same X-wing starfighter in the service of the Resistance (and was flown by Poe in this exact scene) _actually carried torpedoes in the very first Star Wars movie._

@enigmabureau

2 жыл бұрын

I see your TBF Avenger and raise you a Swordfish Torpedo Bomber. It would have even fit the desperate tone of the scene somewhat

One thing that irks me is the speed, you'd think a bombing run would need to be fast so you didnt get hit.

The moment I saw those on screen, I knew we were in trouble. The entire scene proved just as brutal.

That whole "magentic" argument doesn't even make any sense. If they magnetic they would all just attach to each other in a big clunk, but that's not what happens in the film is it. Bombers my ass. So now this film's logic consists of ships flying into a forcefield with no visual representation of how that occured, ships in hyperdrive that bounce of each other like a pinball machine instead of just slicing through them, gravity and oxygen in space and now magic fairy bombs. Well done, Rian.

@astroknight5

3 жыл бұрын

Do you know what electromagnets are?

@saulesalejos4483

3 жыл бұрын

@@astroknight5 Still. If the idea was a rail gun. Then why the f*ck they didn't make a cannon instead?

@nothanks7063

3 жыл бұрын

@@astroknight5 Why don't they stick to the other bombers and Resistance ships that are closer then?

@bonzomcdrumcat4989

3 жыл бұрын

The ship has gravity, so when they drop in the ship they have gravity, and when they leave the ship they carry on because that's how space physics work. I dont get how people criticize bombs but dont point out how a star fighter can have their engines on all the time and dont reach infinitely increasing speed and then turn around without having to burn for 5 minutes

@bobw1678

3 жыл бұрын

@@bonzomcdrumcat4989 That would be great if a) that was mentioned anywhere in the film and b) if the post-movie plot-hole-fillers - i mean, books - didnt already say they were magnetic. Which is just stupid. It's a magnet strong enough to be attracted to a target ship, but not the hull of the bomber itself? Rian wanted his WWII bomber moment. Ok, cool. Lucas used WWII dogfights as inspiration for how the ships would move and fight. The difference is that no one is seriously looking at the starfighter combat and whining that it isnt realistic enough. We're willing to accept that this is the rule of this universe, space battles play out a bit like WWII dogfights, ok, to everyone who isnt a pedantic prick, thats not a huge thing to accept. It's a much harder sell to tell people that existing bombers have now been replaced by ineffective death traps, and that space is now basically a two dimensional field and that we've regressed from advanced missiles to unguided gravity bombs.

Didn't we have self-propelled proton torpedoes in the other movies? Why did we regress to dropping unguided marbles with vastly-reduced payloads on the enemy?

@Namacil2

5 жыл бұрын

Because the enemy started to equip their CAPITAL ships with only a few point defense turrets on the top so a weapon that wouldn`t require you to fly slowly over the ship would make the fight really unfair duh.

@removedot

5 жыл бұрын

When they stopped building explode me buttons massive bases that only take one shot and they need something with a lot more fire power

@theob.8458

5 жыл бұрын

Because reasons

@Velosirraton

5 жыл бұрын

@WingedArchon Starwars has always been filled with stupidity, it's not something new.

@shepherd2148

5 жыл бұрын

Probably because the Resistance, much like the Rebels, are poor as fuck and use older, repurposed equipment because it's all they have? Took me 5 seconds to figure that one out.

I mean I get why everybody is talking about the bombs and how they dropped. But why is nobody talking about how the whole crew shouldve died the moment they oppend the bomb rack ( 8:11 she is litterally in space) so how do they even fly if they all open up and have no protection inside of them.

@stevenschnepp576

Жыл бұрын

Because Star Wars has had atmospheric containment fields as a common piece of technology just about since the beginning.

They should have made a “slapper” ship. You know….a space ship with a big hand that slaps. Like Leia slapping Poe.

What I don't get is why.... Can't they just use torpedoes?

@TzhoOriatee

4 жыл бұрын

You mean like Y-Wings? Good Question.

@NoodleVerse

4 жыл бұрын

Because that would make sense, and apparently Rian Johnson doesn't know what making sense is

@stanisawkwasniewski2087

4 жыл бұрын

maybe they just run out of them i dunno

@ThomasTheThermonuclearBomb

4 жыл бұрын

Their technology is going backwards, so they can’t have them. 🙄

@adrianr.5831

4 жыл бұрын

@Karel Šlaj they blew up the death star with torpedos so they definetly work

"Look how happy she is. Everyone's about to die." made me fall off the chair laughing. Well done.

@moshebenshaul

4 жыл бұрын

That's not the way of the Jedi... Right?

@golfball_diver

4 жыл бұрын

@@moshebenshaul i mean the fighters are armed, so that's fine, but she's enjoying it, that's the problem i guess

These are the kinds of scenes you get when the writer's only criteria for writing scenes is, "wouldn't it be cool if . . ."

Maybe somebody looked at the Tie Bomber and said, 'Let's make that ... but slower and easier to shoot down.

"Illogical" is a pretty mild and insufficient choice of word to describe the concept behind these bombers. Downright "STUPID" gets closer to reality.

@flyfyre7044

4 жыл бұрын

algogy and torpedo bombers, despite their slow speed/lack of maneuverability, still flew low enough that camouflage actually was a legitimate tactic, these b-sf17s are painted white. Incredibly obvious on top of their already terrible stats. Oh, and they can be shot at by turbolasers as well as point defence lasers, so Poe’s plan was flawed from the beginning.

if the bombs were magnetic they could’ve launched them from any angle

@jaws1628

4 жыл бұрын

James Christensen the problem I see with magnetic bombs is that the ship is metal.... so wouldn’t she bombs just stick to the ships dropping the bombs? And if they have a remote way to make them magnetic then how did they fall initially? So many dumb ideas on how they operate😂

@korayacar1444

4 жыл бұрын

Kswagers ESO Not if the bomber operates like a rail gun, they won't. But then again, since these bombers are basically on a suicide mission, might as well give them bigger engines and fly them into the dreadnought anyway.

@jaws1628

4 жыл бұрын

Koray Acar yes if they were on a rail gun but like shown, it’s not. They seem to free fall out of the hull which would not be possible for a huge number of reasons. The only possible explanation I have is that the Dreadnaught was so massive that the equipment used to generate gravity extended far beyond the reaches of the ship. But many other reasons why that can’t work due to certain physics being displayed.

@Tigerman1138

4 жыл бұрын

Here is a dumb idea: The bombing bay is a polymer or non-ferrous-metal. A simple electronic force of N-N or S-S could repel all downward.

@heely69

4 жыл бұрын

@@jaws1628 100% as a electrical engineer, they would stick like fuck to the bomb-bay itself, there's so much wasted payload space on-board too. If I had to work in the constraints of the bomber from a engineering point of view id fuck off the magnetic idea and have a simple ejector that would give the bombs a simple starting push, and being space, they would continue this velocity and be loosely pulled by the gravity of the target ship.

3:48 never underestimate the Winnebago. It can remain undetected and can jam radar systems with ease. Also has great mileage.

I sat through Shyamalan's last Airbender movie, but this opening scene was the first time I considered leaving the theatre

"So why the bombers?" Ryan: "I was thinking about WWII when Iheard we had asian actors!"

Why are they so slow. They are in God damn space. No air resistance.

@herrjohnssen

4 жыл бұрын

They either travel with X times Lightspeed or just as slow as a snail

@GoldInk-ds5up

4 жыл бұрын

@@herrjohnssen makes sense

@averyrandomllama6516

4 жыл бұрын

You can always put the movie at X5 spped eh? ;)

@board8192

4 жыл бұрын

Explain the fucking X-Wings that are in space, have no air resistance and could still move faster than those bombers and could do sideflips, frontflips, backflips.

@board8192

4 жыл бұрын

Bill Simmons We can’t, some of us figured out how to cure depression is by reliving your childhood, however the Sequel Trilogy ain’t gonna be anyone’s childhood.

Your love for Mike Tyson is so endearing lmao.

2:11 Nice! Thats one of my favourite Star Wars moments

“They’re evolving, just backwards.”

@koxz.

3 жыл бұрын

Yes i agree

@sovietcosmonaut2595

3 жыл бұрын

They’re*

@shaqjuice420

2 жыл бұрын

@@sovietcosmonaut2595 congrats you corrected a non existant typo, thanks for being a failed asshole

@jonathangarcia5279

2 жыл бұрын

Ah so they're regressing. I get it!

@Gutenburg100

2 жыл бұрын

Wait? Christianity again? After cowboys!? Type of regression.

"They're magnetic duh" But... that's not how magnets work

@lucalucente3797

4 жыл бұрын

Yeahh...and if the bombs are magnetic why when the bomber release them the bombs do not attract or repell each other? This movie is just bullshit!!!

@Yoda-wf6bu

4 жыл бұрын

Luca Lucente that may not be how magnets work on earth.. it could be different in other planets

@fernandorodriguez876

4 жыл бұрын

@@Yoda-wf6bu yea explain how a magnet can work on different planets, it would literally be the same fucking thing.

@Mrlaggy99

4 жыл бұрын

Boat Cow but the laws of physics aren’t just a suggestion. Its an inescapable boundary. I know we’re talking about a movie where the space ships are as big as cities and they can go light speed, but we’re talking about stuff that we know about

@frankdoodle1481

4 жыл бұрын

Nah, the ships are made of paper so that the magnets don't stick onto them :)

What gets me is that the bombers of the mid 20th century flew in tight but staggered formations to make it much easier for their turrets to cover the blind spots of other bombers when fighters attacked....those things were essentially lined up like 18th century soldiers in their formation. One group of TIE's could easily just keep coming in from the blindspots for easy pickings.

The slow moving bombers with the callout “stay in tight formation” as they approach the Death Star has me in tears. With that being said, everything you said in this video could be refuted by a simple claim: "Its unique design makes for an excellent product placement and merch sales" and. . . its not wrong but there are loads of ways of incorporating a unique design intended for a merch product placement into a movie than what they did here.

You have to understand. Most people who defend this movie, are devoid of logic.

@arteljus983

4 жыл бұрын

Or they don´t understand what Star Wars is about or they are just paid to write good shit on the internet. Just look at the IMDB score. It was very high when this movie released and still is way to high. It´s all fake.

@jamesbyrne6723

4 жыл бұрын

I mean Logic and Star Wars have never worked together

@54356776

4 жыл бұрын

@kimidori Care to elaborate ?

@somerandompersonidk2272

4 жыл бұрын

Want me to make something say why it's good, like I can make a deal with Disney if you'd like.

@kaiserwilhelmii1827

4 жыл бұрын

Anyone who thinks this movie is good is devoid of a working fucking brain

One of the bombs should have said: I have the high ground

@tacos5718

4 жыл бұрын

Vorname Nachname this shit movie doesn’t deserve such an honor

@simonskovgaard6756

4 жыл бұрын

@@tacos5718 the prequels: it over disney trilogy i have the high ground

@theYonda

4 жыл бұрын

I’m not sure Ryan would understand the reference 😂

@facemanmc6364

4 жыл бұрын

hello there

@Flying_Spaghetti_Monster

4 жыл бұрын

@@facemanmc6364 Master Kenobi

this was one of my favorite scenes in the movie (not a very high bar to reach) but i was definitely going "this is very silly" to myself in the theatre

i love that in the disney universe they just copy and paste the ships, the death stars, the creatures. just copy and paste until the entire screen is filled with carbon copies of the ships

Arms dealer: “That? That’s a ‘Y-Wing.’ It’s fast, can travel in hyperspace, is armed with blasters, can launch proton torpedoes, and ion torpedoes. It can be also be armed with a wide variety of guided missiles. In addition they can be adapted for other kinds of torpedos. It has been a proven model for years. That? *That* is the new bomber. We recommended it since...”

@thatkeyboardgirlsha3442

4 жыл бұрын

Riann "But i got the idea from another great movie!"

@Bothandle70

4 жыл бұрын

george lucas: "this is walkng tank thats slow and clumsy and can attack on only one direction". star wars fans: "best thing evaarrr"

@mynpc

4 жыл бұрын

@@Bothandle70 at least it's heavy amoured

@shotgunatthedisco6909

4 жыл бұрын

@@Bothandle70 To be fair, AT-ATs were built as a heavily-armored terror weapon, their purpose was to terrify the average plebian into not using their bigger-than-average blaster rifle against the military police who had the gall to throw them out of their favorite bar.

@MediumRareOpinions

4 жыл бұрын

@@Bothandle70 You just described every castmate assault gun deployed in WW2 with the exception of the walking part, yet those assault guns were reckoned to be one of the most cost effective designs of the war.

To everyone that’s like The bombs are attracted with mAgNeTs Why don’t they stick to the actual bombers

@ElectromagNick

4 жыл бұрын

Or each other

@iamnotglenn

4 жыл бұрын

​@@ElectromagNick well an actual logical physics-based answer there would be that all the bombs and the ship would have the same type of charge so they'd repel each other. The ship having a larger and stronger field should push all of them away even as the lower ones start pushing back against the bombs above them. But this explanation also doesn't work because all of the bombs dropped straight down and in a system with only repelling forces the bombs would start spreading out instead of dropping in a straight line. They were better off saying the bombs were gravity-based because gravity still works but to a lesser extent while a planet is underneath you.

@andrewibbotson7076

4 жыл бұрын

I think the (dumb) answer is it's like a rail gun style thingo, propelling the bombs.... just super fucking slowly. So still not logical.

@lucasoheyze4597

4 жыл бұрын

It's not magnets, just gravity.

@andrewibbotson7076

4 жыл бұрын

@@lucasoheyze4597 If that is so, the Supremacy wouldn't have the mass to attract the bombs with any reliable speed.

Slow moving, tightly packed bombers against powerful capital ships with swarms of fast TIE Fighters protecting them. What could possibly go wrong?

Your video was referred to me as I had also noted the bombers in their own blast area. I have one critique. The music you put to the bomber run makes it more exciting.

The V-2 rockets Germany launched at the UK in 1943 were more impressive and effective than the bombers in The Last Jedi.

@ali-cat1101

5 жыл бұрын

yea they were very very effective the flying bomb. Lets see them write V-2 Rocket in the next movie and call it RV2 it sounds like a driod but why the hell not

@aaroncoelho-irani4460

4 жыл бұрын

Probably even the V1

@johnathanblackwell9960

4 жыл бұрын

That's for damn sure, we took some that we captures and fired them at the Japanese.

@Shawnmiller1903

4 жыл бұрын

V2 rockets were Germany's fat man and little boy

@giathuanleviet4138

4 жыл бұрын

The Wright brothers's plane were more impressive than this bomber

The original Y-wing is not only fast, and agile, it is also a bomber

@Swiftbow

5 жыл бұрын

Y-Wings are fairly slow. Using the old TIE Fighter game as a reference, they were the easiest Rebel ships to destroy. B-Wings came in second, then X-Wings, then the infernal A-Wings, which were nigh unhittable. That said, Y-Wings would fly rings around the idiotic bombers in TLJ.

@ryanmorris8158

5 жыл бұрын

With an ion cannon tooo

@bravskii10

5 жыл бұрын

The Y-wing actually makes sense as a bomber. with actually torpedoes and missiles. gravity bombs are useless in space.

@grev7794

5 жыл бұрын

The B-2 Bombers in real life can fly faster than those "space b-17" in star wars. I don't see how those bombers can reach escape velocity lol.

@joynelbonetdelgado4952

5 жыл бұрын

Y Wings also looked cool and was more resistant to damage although slower than x and A wings.

I don’t know why, but watching the bombers slowly getting shot to fragments is so satisfying. 👌😌