Senate inquiry SUPPRESSES prolife voices
The Senate inquiry into reproductive healthcare which was initiated by Greens Senator, Larissa Waters has blatantly excluded and silenced the thousands of prolife Australians who took the time to write submissions. This sets a highly concerning anti-democratic precedent for the conduct of an inquiry in the Australian Senate as it means that those who are running the inquiry can exclude submissions from those they disagree with. Please share this video and comment to let me know what you think.
Пікірлер: 17
When I read the email response from my submission last week , I was very very angry. I had worked long and hard and navigated really challenging emotions . I focused on the young women who might make uniformed decisions and eventually, it was done . I am so appreciative of you Janna and your team in all that you do. May God continue to guide you and us as we continue this shared journey . Blessings from Sydney .
Yes - " This sets a highly concerning anti-democratic precedent " so we must join together to fight their hypocrisy .
@rebelrachel1629
Жыл бұрын
I agree!
@DrJoannaHowe
Жыл бұрын
Absolutely- we have to get the word out that this is happening
Most of the young women who are pro choice have no idea what really happens in these issues or, how they are being used . God help us to never give up in our efforts to warn them.
The corruption being exposed is not ok and nothing I ever expected the 'senate enquiry' could possibly consider in our Australian society
This is very disturbing and unethical. It needs go stop. Thank you for uncovering this Injustice
Thank you so much for making this video, it was very helpful and informative
@DrJoannaHowe
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for your encouragement. I feel called to educate people about this as it’s so anti-democratic
Thank you for Dr Howe for all the effort and time you have put in to this. Hopefully in time your work will reach wider and wider. I emailed in a submission, albeit fairly simple. I did receive an email from the inquiry which included the following: The committee has decided to accept your document as correspondence. This means that the committee has noted the issues you have raised, but your statement has not been accepted as a submission and will not be published on the committee's website. Please note that if you choose to publish your correspondence, it will not be protected by parliamentary privilege. So, yes i imagine there could be many of us deemed not worthy of publishing. I agree that full disclosure of nunbers of submissions, and how many werenr published and why would be obviously important. Similiarly, i wonder if the final report actually discusses the concerns of people who are not in the camp of abortion at any time for any reason. They could raise those concerns, and then give their own answers to them. At the least.
@kaylenehousego8929
Жыл бұрын
We must fight against our own disappointment and experience I reckon.......May God bless you in all that you do.
Thank you so much for your hard work and information sharing. It really troubles me when I see what is happening in our society.
Thanks Dr. Howe, your update is deeply disturbing. Communism is very active in our country. Totally unacceptable behaviour by the Senator and the Greens. Human life is very disposable to them, and their obvious stacking of the deck is undemocratic and disgusting. May her efforts fail.
It's utterly appalling!!!
This situation makes you feel so helpless, disappointed and discouraged. How can you have faith in any political party when this sort of bias, murky operation is happening. What else has passed the Australian Parliament by this sort of underhanded process. Thank you Dr Howe for shining a light on this enquiry.
Abortion must be free, legal and accessible nationwide. Larissa is a legend and we thank her for everything she does 💚💪
@amandaturner8928
Жыл бұрын
So you condone murder do you? With all the "education" around why don't people just use contraception? Abortion is never the right thing. And everyone will answer to God. Funny that people are more concerned to save trees, than babies. That says it ALL.