SCOTUS. The best Justices money can buy.

@deselby6669

7 күн бұрын

All Federalist Society just like Judge Aileen Cannon and former AG Bill Barr..All elite Arch Catholics and Criminal..

@thomasfplm

7 күн бұрын

It is so weird to me that in the US the judges of the Supreme Court are called "Justices". To me, it sounds like if they were being treated as gods. In the same way was there are various Greek/Roman gods whose names are exactly what they represent like Juventas (youth) or Chronos (time).

@antonomaseapophasis5142

5 күн бұрын

No, not really. Roberts coup d’état opinion is a mess. Not the product of a great mind. The FedSoc Six are treacherous mediocrities.

@johndigiacomo1674

4 күн бұрын

@hypsyzygy506, the Heritage Foundation paid thirty five million dollars to get Amy Conan Barrett elected to the court. This court has no credibility currently, and there is going to be another accounting.

6 have committed treason

@user-wi9hv2pb2q

7 күн бұрын

Biden needs to seal team them before they install their puppet dictator.

@philipb2134

6 күн бұрын

Some committed perjury. They would not have been confirmed unless they affirmed that Roe was stare decisis; meanwhile, you can not have attained tenure on the sharply Catholic faculty of Law at Notre Dame unless you vehemently opposed Roe.

@CraftyGrandmaDem

5 күн бұрын

@@philipb2134 6 of them also perjured themselves when they said "No one is above the law, not even a president" Vote Biden/Blue all the way down the ballot. We need more democrats in the House and Senate to do anything about this corrupt s. court. Why doesn't the IRS go after Thomas and Alito for their bribes. I bet they didn't pay taxes on all those bribes/vacations/RV's/ houses/private school education/fishing trips/etc. Democracy is an Americans issue. It will take more then 1 party to save it. I don't want dictator Donnie &/or his project 2025.

@johndigiacomo1674

4 күн бұрын

@randybrunet6740, three lied under oath in their confirmation hearings, two have openly accepted bribes, all nine have decided they have the right to legislate by ruling. They have denied precedent, and in the Colorado case decided to legislate rather than interpret the Constitution. EVERY court in the land, from the local magistrate to the Supreme Court MUST uphold Constitutional laws. The Colorado Supreme Court was upholding section three of the Fourteenth Amendment to the letter. The Supreme Court added the requirement of a Congressional indictment. It was not a requirement in the Fourteenth Amendment, therefore their adding it made it a legislative act, prohibited by the Constitution.

"Weakened" trust in SCotUS? Nah, try ~destroyed~.

SCOTUS is irresponsible

Thomas and Alito Must be Impeached! ⚖️

@ReallyBadJuJu

7 күн бұрын

And if our politicians lack the spine, the people are under no obligation to acknowledge their legitimacy.

@CraftyGrandmaDem

5 күн бұрын

@@ReallyBadJuJu Democrats don't have enough votes to impeach. R's are blocking any attempts they make even to reform the s. Court. Democrats, Independents and Republican voters need to vote Biden/Blue all the way down the ballot. Democracy is an American issue. American voters don't want dictator Donnie and his project 2025. Americans like their freedoms.

Time to begin ignoring the lunatic SCOTUS.

Sorry. It's too late. Our Extreme Court has completely lost the trust of all but those that paid to play.

@Vbluevital

11 күн бұрын

They need to be immediately arrested for treason as enemies of state.

@user-ji2on8eg3l

11 күн бұрын

​@@Vbluevitalthe Constitution has a specific criterion for charging someone with treason. Unpopular rulings are not among them.

@mitziewheeler8517

10 күн бұрын

​@@user-ji2on8eg3lbut being bribed to go against your country I believe still is.

@virtuallycasey6121

10 күн бұрын

The problem may be that SCOTUS should never have been blindly trusted in the first place. It's super interesting to learn about the founding fathers and the thought processes behind their decisions. I'm not even American. Justice free from force or will is great but I think SCOTUS should strive to be more than this. SCOTUS should represent the very heart and soul of the nation. Something to be cherished by all and fiercely protected. Protected from anyone who tries to attack it, including from within. Currently, SCOTUS is tainted, it is corrupt, it is influenced by both the force and will of a few people who are abusing the power that has been bestowed to them. As James Madison said, "The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted".

@trevx3680

10 күн бұрын

@@mitziewheeler8517 Unfortunately SCOTUS has legalized bribery with one of their recent rulings.

I'm old and I have always had respect for SCOTUS regardless of party. But the current justice's behavior, lack of emotional intelligence, pettiness, and disregard for precedence has destabilized the country and done great harm to many. I am afraid the blatant partisan views and desire to force 330 million people to submit to their catholic religious beliefs has caused deep distrust.

@Chulitatr

11 күн бұрын

They're not Catholic, it's ChristoNationalism.

@eh3477

9 күн бұрын

Yes, however the ultraconservative justices aren't mainstream Catholics, and they're primarily representing the choices of the Heritage Fnd. Remember that Sotomayor and Biden are Catholics too, more consistent with the mainstream.

@Justin-yb2yd

8 күн бұрын

@@Linda-lf3rj SHUT UP AND STOP BEING A DRAMA QUEEN

@MKR5210

7 күн бұрын

Let's not gaslight. Biden is a Catholic, as is the Pope.... Neither of them want to force their beliefs on anyone. This is a particularly American thing.... Old Testament Believers pretending to be Christians. It is typically right wing and fascist ...

@flowergarden-1

7 күн бұрын

Thats right. I'm Catholic and we still send our kids to parochial school and catechism classes held AFTER public school hours.

A quote Former President Theodore Roosevelt: "No man is above the law and no man is below it; nor do we ask any man's permission when we ask him to obey it. Obedience to the law is demanded as a right, not asked as a favor." "The judges who administer justice in our countries must be seen as ethical and subject to meaningful correction when it is necessary. Nothing less than the rule of law is at stake."

@jimhazel1544

5 күн бұрын

I guess some of them only read their own opinions.

Their power no longer relies on anybody's trust.

@meoff7602

6 күн бұрын

Never did. Life time appointments and the Senate votes them in.

Imagine majority of Americans not abiding by the Supreme Court's Rulings. There goes their POWER and LEGITIMACY😊

@Chulitatr

11 күн бұрын

Exactly.

@marvinmartin4692

10 күн бұрын

I’ve been saying this! They have no enforcement capability!

@lazytyrant9010

10 күн бұрын

Imagine that.... Are you suggesting that the legislative branch should write a law protecting women's right to have an abortion? That means you're in agreement with the Supreme Court. Why are you upset with them again?

@Magik1369

9 күн бұрын

Imagine if those of us that are furious about the SC united and boycotted work and taxes, thus bringing commerce in the USA to a screeching halt. Time for the People to stand up and fight.

@janetritchie7499

9 күн бұрын

​@@lazytyrant9010Obviously you are wrong once again, lazytyrant. You need to go back to first grade and learn to read.

The court has lost literally all trust! Zero! Nada! Zilch! As in none!

@ReallyBadJuJu

7 күн бұрын

I trust 3 of the justices.

@marvinmartin4692

7 күн бұрын

@@ReallyBadJuJu well bad ju ju , I feel the same. I cut statements short for brevity.

@motionattached

5 күн бұрын

It might the time to discuss the term limit on the court too.

@CraftyGrandmaDem

5 күн бұрын

@@motionattached Republican senators are blocking the s. court ethics, recusal and transparency bill. They are also blocking the one to end price gauging, end credit card junk fees, the lowering check overdrafts from $32.00 down to $8.00. They are blocking the windfall profits tax, IVF, birth control, the tax excessive CEO pay and they let the pass trough loophole expire. The Republican senators are not working for the average American they are working for the rich donors. Let's vote them out. Then we can work on this corrupt s. court. Democracy is an American issue, not a party issue.

No Public can swallow this act of treason

@MartinDeano-n4v

9 күн бұрын

What are you gonna do soyboy. Keep crying.

@KaiserBlade

8 күн бұрын

Treason? Ha! Snowflakes are so entertaining. Thanks Randy.

@Icewind007

7 күн бұрын

@@KaiserBlade Orcs shouldn't speak. You already signed away your rights.

@KaiserBlade

7 күн бұрын

@@Icewind007 I'll speak anytime I want little boy.

@Icewind007

7 күн бұрын

@@KaiserBlade Uh huh, keep that up when fascism takes over, and you won't be speaking for long.

The Supreme Court is no longer Supreme! Time to Stand

@MurdocIsASaint

11 күн бұрын

There is no difference here than Trump calling question elections, he’s denying the existence of the US Constitution and is treasonous. The host should be treated as such

@blondhairblackstrat

11 күн бұрын

"Stand back and stand by!"

@williamstafford8248

11 күн бұрын

I remember when the Supreme Court was Left Leaning Justices. The damage they have done is beyond comprehension.

@janetprice85

10 күн бұрын

Biden's senile and defaming the Court is because Democrats know their TDS lawfare cases are garbage.

@trevx3680

10 күн бұрын

@@janetprice85 If only you had any evidence of any lawfare. So far no one has found anything, nor has Biden defamed anyone.

Most of these judges have shown themselves to be corrupt. Impeach them. Set term limits. Give performance reviews. Over turn the immunity ruling.

@elbmp5151

7 күн бұрын

Stalin would be happy with you

Time for a vote of "No Confidence", folks. Our SCOTUS deserves it.

Trust with them has been nonexistent for years. They just keep going with no repercussions.

Vote 💙 Vote 💙 Vote 💙 Vote 💙 Vote 💙 Stop Project 2025! Spread the word

@JasonDrvmz

11 күн бұрын

That’s a conspiracy theory

@WarnTwice

11 күн бұрын

@@JasonDrvmz False. I suggest looking it up. This has been a Republican plan since 1981. It's called "Mandate for Leadership". Please inform yourself.

@WarnTwice

11 күн бұрын

@@JasonDrvmz But we both know you probably won't.

@JasonDrvmz

11 күн бұрын

@@WarnTwice I won’t because it’s just fear monger propaganda 👎🏾👎🏾👎🏾… I’m voting Red 💪🏾🇺🇸

@JasonDrvmz

11 күн бұрын

@@WarnTwice I’m voting Red 💪🏾🇺🇸

Get Democratic majority in Senate and Congress, eliminate the filibuster and dilute this clown show.

@uwempls

7 күн бұрын

If dems have the majority in both house, they can impeach and remove the judges, then appoint and confirm new ones.

SCOTUS has lost all credibility.

Harlen crow is so happy with his investments/bribes.

@jamesreid8638

5 күн бұрын

Satan is pleased with Harlan Crow, and he will have the last laugh.

@flowergarden-1

3 күн бұрын

Illuminati billionaires

REBALANCE THE COURT

Yea IT IS CORRUPT🎉

Alito believes we are unreasonable.

@blondhairblackstrat

11 күн бұрын

At this point, nobody cares what that corrupt jacka$$ believes.

@RobertThirdReich

10 күн бұрын

You are 😂

@RobertThirdReich

10 күн бұрын

He's right 😂

@andytalarowski9654

10 күн бұрын

@@RobertThirdReich awe, hitler youth looking to catch some feelies? I wish you got more hugs too big guy.

@andytalarowski9654

10 күн бұрын

@@RobertThirdReich i wish you got more hugs growing up too cupcake.

Expand the court.

@RITPA

11 күн бұрын

Ridiculous, should we expand the Executive branch? Two Presidents, maybe five Presidents? Elections have consequences. Trump had a net +1 conservatives to court. Be careful what you ask for, expanding court could make it MORE conservative.

@tinoyb9294

11 күн бұрын

@@RITPA you are obviously ignorant of history and the process of creating the court. Do your homework before replying to this.

@VOTEBLUE24

11 күн бұрын

@@RITPA Ridiculous to let the "Captured Court" stand at a 6-3 conservative super majority making the liberal justices nothing more than hostages. 20% of the adult population in the US identifies as Catholic compared to the eye popping 69% representation now on the SC. That is how 50 years of settled law is being overturned 6-3 conservative super majority Ruling only in favor of Republicans and the Courts conservative billionaire donors .. would be the end of democracy.. and the ushering in of the Oligarchy. The first three words in the Constitution are the most powerful: We the People. They declare that the Constitution derives its power not from a king or a Congress, but from the people themselves. This concept of popular sovereignty-power to the people-is the foundation upon which the entire Constitution depends. There is nothing in the Constitution that limits the size oi the SCOTUS. The Court should be expanded by 6 more Liberal Justices bringing the number to 15 justices . . Clearly the Captured Conservative 6-3 majority can't be trusted to safe guard our democracy from the Harlan Crows and the Leonard Leo's .

@cameronmcleod8419

11 күн бұрын

​@@RITPAThere's precedent for altering the number of SCOTUS justices. No such precedent exists for expanding the office of the president. I know conservatives don't care about precedent, law, or moral integrity, but you need to substantiate these changes, or you run the risk of facing a violent public.

@virtuallycasey6121

10 күн бұрын

Distrust the court might be a better option. If this period of turmoil has demonstrated anything it is that society should not blindly trust SCOTUS. The reverence and respect the court had has been shattered. So perhaps flip it on it's head. Treat every SCOTUS ruling with extreme caution. "All men having power ought to be mistrusted." - James Madison

How can a court be non-political when it's the politicians who grant them that role.

@sarahchristine2345

11 күн бұрын

Because they’re supposed to uphold the constitution and serve the American citizens above their own personal ideologies, and that’s no longer the case. The original court that decided Roe had a 7-2 conservative super majority and they decided to uphold women’s rights because it was the right thing to do. Trump’s put people in place that consider themselves Christians fighting for the soul of their country above all else. They now serve themselves and the billionaire’s who helped put them in power. 2/3 of all Americans have lost trust in them, and they cease to exist the moment WE say alright that’s enough, and stop taking them seriously.

@trevx3680

10 күн бұрын

The entire process of selecting justices means that it is by definition political.

@fixieroy

5 күн бұрын

They are supposed to have an ethics code. Every other judge has strict rules to abide by. But not the Supreme Ct. in 2025 that needs to change. Dems must reform the court with strict accountability, i say strip them of the recent powergrab and strictly limit thier jobs to making neutral decisions based and supported by laws NOT theories. Add in some transparency regulation then to top it off expand the court. The GOP will be salty for generations.

@trevx3680

5 күн бұрын

@@fixieroy Absolutely. There needs to be a transparent body that selects justices and another body that has investigative powers. Ethics, transparency, and accountability should be at the heart of this process. Justices should never receive donations or "gifts". There should be a method of enforcing recusal as well. Too much is left to the justice's personal judgement. Politics is destroying our justice system which then destroys our society.

We Must Expand the Supreme Court! ⚖️

Vote the dictator out and put scotus back in there box. They should be about justice not lining their pockets!

'Weakens?' It has all but gone, for a great many.

Start a system of rotation of Supreme Court Justices from the 13 Circuits. Every judge who has served for 13 years would be swapped out for a Circuit court judge, taking the circuits in order. In the meantime increase the count to 13.

@Chulitatr

11 күн бұрын

o quote Former President Theodore Roosevelt: "No man is above the law and no man is below it; nor do we ask any man's permission when we ask him to obey it. Obedience to the law is demanded as a right, not asked as a favor." "The judges who administer justice in our countries must be seen as ethical and subject to meaningful correction when it is necessary. Nothing less than the rule of law is at stake."

@stevecollins9750

9 күн бұрын

I like your train of thought. Something absolutely has to change and once again we're in unprecedented territory. Lifetime appointments are the nails in democracy's coffin.

@alicegilbert4186

8 күн бұрын

Impeach all the corrupt Supreme Court justices

“What happens when that weakens?” 2A. The radical gqp scotus needs cleared out if the courts won’t be expanded.

@DellikkilleD

9 күн бұрын

correct, we are well past the time to practice that right.

@Jonvon65

7 күн бұрын

​@@DellikkilleDBe sure to use bump stocks for the irony.

Was thinking , July 4th is coming up where the U.S. celebrates its independence. Well the women citizens of America will have nothing to celebrate. Our independence was taken from us by Trump and and the Supreme Court that he packed for that reason and also from a lot of help from Congress to overthrow Roe.

@Ghost-Mama

8 күн бұрын

😢you’re absolutely right. We have nothing to celebrate. No wins. No protection. Nothing and no one to help us but ourselves. 😢

@flowergarden-1

3 күн бұрын

PINK & BLUE WAVE🩷 💙

Our Constitution vs Project 2025. Pick a side. Written in 1787, ratified in 1788, and in operation since 1789, the U.S Constitution is the world's longest surviving written charter of government. Its first three words-"We the People"-affirm that the government of the United States exists to serve its citizens. For over two centuries the Constitution has remained in force because its framers wisely separated and balanced governmental powers to safeguard the interests of majority rule and minority rights, of liberty and equality, and of the federal and state governments. Since 1789 the Constitution has evolved through amendments to meet the changing needs of a nation now profoundly different from the 18th-century world in which its creators lived. More than two centuries after its ratification, the U.S. Constitution remains a vital and living document, strengthened by amendments, serving as both guide and protector of U.S. citizens and their elected officials. It has survived civil war, economic depressions, assassinations, and even terrorist attacks, to remain a source of wisdom and inspiration. The creation of the U.S. Constitution depended upon the knowledge, experience, and dedication of its framers, just as its endurance depends upon the knowledge and experience of each succeeding generation of Americans. For this reason, it is important for us to learn and understand the governing principles of our nation, set forth in the Constitution. Semper Fi.. 🇺🇸

@robfarrell9104

11 күн бұрын

Doesn’t it also state that military conflict must be voted on by Congress, how’s that been working out for us since WW2? Bet you still believe there are WMDs in Iraq and that Ukraine is winning lol.

@combatepistemologist8382

11 күн бұрын

Justice Scalia's judicial philosophy was based on "textualism" and "originalism," which involves interpreting the Constitution based on the original meaning of its words at the time it was written. He was not alone among justices in consistently arguing that the Constitution is "dead, dead, dead."

@gasovensforqcult

11 күн бұрын

The Constitution is also flawed. Flaw 1: Electoral College; Flaw 2: Lifetime appointments for Supreme Court justices; Flaw 3: not allowing women to vote; Flaw 4: "Colored" people are only counted as 3/5 of a person. These are just what I can enumerate off the top of my head. The Constitution was constructed in such a way to bamboozle the common uneducated farmer that he had a voice by vote in a "representative" democracy - which is not a pure democracy as this representation negates the popular voice, thus preventing democracy by "those who know best" (read wealthy landowners). These flaws have immense detrimental effects on our situation today: the Electoral College has prevented the peoples choice of presidential candidate in 7 of the last 8 elections; also, lifetime appointments of SCOTUS justices has led to activist judges pushing Federalist Society principles that have resulted in rights and civil rights being stripped from the populace, and since only two days ago, the rights of federal agencies to determine how to enforce the policies the American people have granted through their votes via their elected representatives. The Constitution is in dire need of a v 2.0. 225-ish years after it's ratification the world has evolved and faces challenges not dreamed of by it's wealthy framers who sought the type of monarchical control of the government similar to the government they rebelled against. We can do much better. Tempus Fugit

@jrg5978

11 күн бұрын

@@gasovensforqcultwhat do you mean electoral college has prevented the people’s choice in 7/8 last elections? Bush ‘00 and Trump ‘16 don’t have the popular vote, but the other 6 do?

@Chulitatr

11 күн бұрын

A quote Former President Theodore Roosevelt: "No man is above the law and no man is below it; nor do we ask any man's permission when we ask him to obey it. Obedience to the law is demanded as a right, not asked as a favor." "The judges who administer justice in our countries must be seen as ethical and subject to meaningful correction when it is necessary. Nothing less than the rule of law is at stake."

What a difference a day makes.

It matters little if the public trusts a puppet court once they empower the government to do anything it wants with impunity.

Justices can be impeached by Congress for their personal behavior not for their rulings from the bench. Ask congress for articles of impeachment if you believe they are necessary.

@ariaflame-au

10 күн бұрын

This Congress?

Remember when John Roberts said under oath that he believed in stare decisis? Good times.

Give. Biden. A. Win. And. The. House. And. The. Senate. He. Can. Add. 6 more. Dems. To. The. Courts

@OmnipotentO

5 күн бұрын

Not Dems. Just fair normal judges instead of fascist maga cultists.

The house is a joke in the worst way and the court bought and payed for

The Subprime Court

@Chulitatr

11 күн бұрын

o quote Former President Theodore Roosevelt: "No man is above the law and no man is below it; nor do we ask any man's permission when we ask him to obey it. Obedience to the law is demanded as a right, not asked as a favor." "The judges who administer justice in our countries must be seen as ethical and subject to meaningful correction when it is necessary. Nothing less than the rule of law is at stake."

@RobertThirdReich

10 күн бұрын

o quote?

End oversight COMPLETELY by sending SCOTUS home, dissolve the court and its regulations, and take their cheques/pensions/benefits and either return them to the taxpayers or give to homeless Vietnam vets etc....🤔😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@RobertThirdReich

10 күн бұрын

Communism? No thanks 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤔

The first 3 words of our Constitution are "We the People." The first words of project 2025 are, "We the top 2%" Protect our Constitution at all costs. 🇺🇸 Semper Fi..

@WarnTwice

11 күн бұрын

The scary part is this has been a Republican plan since 1981

@ricardodsavant2965

11 күн бұрын

That's deep. You should have t-shirts made.

@ricardodsavant2965

11 күн бұрын

@@WarnTwice - I never knew that. Thanks.

@WarnTwice

11 күн бұрын

@@ricardodsavant2965 Mandate for Leadership is what it's called. Look into it.

@Firefighter_Matt

11 күн бұрын

Project 25. A idea or plan that could be put in place. We have no scientifically certain evidence X (project 25 in this case) will happen. Not the first or last time this has happened in history of the United States of America. This happens on both political sides and is not subject to just a gathering of people that identify with a certain political party by definition. If just one human who identifies themselves as a (R) disagrees with what that project outlines it does not encompass a political party entirely. Thus also no longer being a scientific certainty and just how some humans who identify with said thing think. One can also find ideas or plans that opposing party had wanted to put in place. It did not encompass a entire group of people who identified with a political party nor did it happen.

Scotus does not operate like they rely on public trust. They act like they manufacture public trust.

@Sunny-il1xm

9 күн бұрын

Right now, They are being ruled by a narcissist Traitor who constantly asks for immunity for his crimes and the crimes of his followers. He's opening the doors to lawlessness and he can't be touched.

Lack of justice breeds vigilantism.

It's fair to say it "vanished". The past tense of this word, in these circumstances, is intentional.

Simple; Abolish SCOTUS.

It's not weakened, but gone.

As we've found out with Trump, Gandhi, and Martin Luther King, laws are only as strong as people's willingness to both enforce and follow them.

Weakens? It's gone completely.

HAVE A REFERENDUM ON THE SUPREME COURT AND WHETHER JUSTICES SHOULD BE REPLACED.

Weaken? No. It’s gone!

Well evidently these scotus members never read this part

Why does the supreme courts power depend on public trust?

@reidpinchback8850

10 күн бұрын

The rule of law only exists if people see that the rules are reasonable in measure, equitable in application, and relevant to the needs of the country. If the rules change on a whim, if equity becomes an absurdity, and if the laws only have relevance to those who wish to inflict pain on others... then you approach a point where the risk of damage from not following the rules is no different than the risk of damage with trying to follow the rules. The system becomes imaginary. Justice Breyer had cautioned his colleagues on strict textualism because the rules could lose on some or all of those points. In his words, you could end up with a constitution that nobody wants. And what is going on now with SCOTUS is worse than what Breyer feared. Even a conservative justice like ACB is saying as much in some of her dissents.

@hypsyzygy506

10 күн бұрын

All power comes from the person. Society is created when two or more people give part of their sovereignty to a common authority they agree to support and comply with. When the common authority acts against the agreed will of the people, individuals will reclaim their personal sovereignty. When enough people refuse to accept the common authority, the kings fall and people die until a new common authority is established.

@RobertThirdReich

10 күн бұрын

​@@reidpinchback8850The left thinks a law that would allow killing a baby after birth is reasonable. 😂🤡

@trevx3680

10 күн бұрын

@@RobertThirdReich Lol. Nope. Poor attempt at disinformation.

The trust is not weakened, it's broken.

Doj must ignore the 6

Revolt!!

Federalist# 78 "Hence it is, that there can be but few men in the society who will have sufficient skill in the laws to qualify them for the stations of judges. And making the proper deductions for the ordinary depravity of human nature, the number must be still smaller of those who unite the requisite integrity with the requisite knowledge." Publius

Nice work MSNBC.

Hitler wirh a red tie.

I guess they forgot about the other half of the country who strongly disagree with them.

Then why tf is it still running

To paraphrase - they've made their decision; now let them enforce it!

The danger is not the judgment of the person with the gun, it is the availability to the gun and maybe even just the trigger or the ammunition. Me comparing what Hamilton said about the judges on the supreme court.

I lost all trust in the Supreme Court when they said Trump has immunity

Thomas and Alito should be jailed for their corrupt conduct. They aren’t judges they’re criminals. Until they are scotus has no legitimacy and all of their “judgements” should be ignored.

They have none, we can ignore them and defund them- done

When in the entire history of America has it mattered the least little bit that the citizens trusted the Supreme Court?

Weakens, no is torn up by it roots and shredded then composed in the manure pile. In 1778, the average lifespan was 46yrs not 85yrs.

That's an interesting point about the court - it's power rests only on the degree to which others listen to it - or not. Amost of the enforcement power of the government rests with the executive branch. As we saw on 1/6, Congress has little ability even to defend itself, much less anyone else. A bad faith actor like Trump could easily just ignore SCOTUS and do what he wants anyway so this immunity thing is little more than a fig leaf for him. The real damage has been done by the renegade court, undermining itself. We all listened when we believed they were impartial arbiters of the law. When they clearly become partizan hacks, the spell is broken.

Treason!

When it weakens we do whatever we want legal or otherwise because we know the books are coked so we might as well do what we want.

When? When!?! Oh boy, that ship has long sailed. Abort the Supreme Court!

Behind enemies lines at this time.. being persuaded to pull the oppressor line at this time. So... What trust

Public trust in SCOTUS isn’t weakened, it’s destroyed.

The supreme court should keep their opinions to themselves.

Well, not only did they give him immunity, they put a cherry on top of it.

What happen when the trust is gone? What happens when no court judge obeys these edicts?

And we don’t trust them

Treason

We're here now and NOTHING happens, apparently.

What happens??? We put the trust back on by removing the folk who created it.

The Court's power is from judicial review, and constitutional interpretation. They don't answer to the public, nor should they be swayed by what they may want

They need to b removed from their bs power

Ensure the trifecta of election and drive time limits aka 3-6 months of congress assessment on the court then enact laws to protect and define ALL the main tenets of the constitution including the major amendments Only way rather than piecemeal ad hoc patchy repair

Yeah, that really worked out well didn't it.

Lock the Buzzard in Black Robe,s Up.

Ukraine Flags in the Oval Office! Cheering for Aid is just wrong!

Let's make this statement go viral with record breaking likes 👍🏻 " I've lost all faith in SCOTUS "

I guess now y'all get it make America great again......

All those originalists!

Too late.

Like the people’s trust in our Federal government?

@Vbluevital

11 күн бұрын

No, like the people's complete lack of trust in republican oath breakers, thieves and traitors

@DivineMagickOccult

11 күн бұрын

True. I hope what’s happening now is a huge eye-opener for what happens when the government becomes tyrannical. I’m still voting for President Biden. 💙💙💙

Weakens? Try disappears.

The Supreme court lacks any Constitutional mechanism to enforce its decisions. In 1832 the State of Georgia and President Andrew Jackson defied the Supreme Court and continued the forced removal of Cherokee Indians from Georgia's territory. In 1957 Governor Faubus of Arkansas defied a decision to allow nine black children to attend a segregated school. Only when President Eisenhower intervened with the power of the Executive Branch were the children allowed to attend the school. Some other instances of defiance were recorded around Roe vs. Wade when Different States imposed restrictions in defiance of the law. What happens when decisions made by the Supreme Court are deemed to undermine the structure of the Executive Power? Can they rely on the enforcement power of the Executive Branch to force itself to avoid defying the Court's decision? Some say the answer lies in the degree of Public Trust the Court may have. Public opinion alone could sway the actions of the Excutive Branch.

Public trust! That is at an all time low already. No reform is the only thing but can only be done if you vote and VOTE BLUE down ballot

No the power of the SCOTUS comes from the constitution. Sometimes rulings are going to be opposite to the public since the publics wants are not always constitutionally possible. Courts rulings are not supposed to be determined on popularity.

I lost trust in SCOTUS when Biden abdicated and allowed the slime-ball Thomas to be a Justice.

In the words of Optimus Prime: "Time to find out."

Look up Thomas Jefferson's thoughts on the "Tyranny of Wealth" and note his Remedy Billionaires buying Justices, and the Church buying Justices, and Corporations Buying Justices.

More of this. Project 2025 is 900 pages!!! Many stories. J. Epestein. More like this!!!