It's not new physics. It's a deeper understanding of physics.

@paulthomas963

Ай бұрын

They don't understand anything though. They anti-understand harder and harder.

@fisikapart-time8130

Ай бұрын

It is just rebranding name of luminiferous Aether/Ether

My most trusted Professor always reminded us; "This is just the currently accepted understanding of the way it is OR might be!" He taught that it was up to "Us" to prove it "Right or Wrong"!

@17cmmittlererminenwerfer81

10 ай бұрын

Yup, science is a process, not a destination. But Obama told us (erroneously) "the science is settled!" without understanding that true science is never settled.

@bigred3193

10 ай бұрын

​@@17cmmittlererminenwerfer81 in my perspective that's what makes it settled. "Change is the only constant in our lives"

@Gurukittyart

9 ай бұрын

Yeah that’s the imperial method

@fusiondon

9 ай бұрын

​@@Gurukittyart You're on the mark, though the google misspelled your idea: em·pir·i·cal adjective adjective: empirical based on, concerned with, or verifiable by observation or experience rather than theory or pure logic. "they provided considerable empirical evidence to support their argument" Opposite: theoretical

@saltycreole2673

9 ай бұрын

My college chemistry instructor said the same thing. Models are just that, models. They can change in an instant with a new discovery.

What a strange coincidence, my cat and I were discussing this just the other day.

@jameshoey303

9 ай бұрын

But is your cat alive or dead?

@whizzer2944

9 ай бұрын

​@@jameshoey303both

@janicereadymartcher7696

9 ай бұрын

Neither.

@eddybabe7963

9 ай бұрын

Don't trust cats, they cheat at cards.

@saltycreole2673

9 ай бұрын

Bet the cat won.😂

We are wrong about 99% of the things

I am constantly amazed that people can dream up these concepts. Then others can dream up ways to test them. Then still more people can analyze and interpret the results. What an astonishing team effort.

@markmcd2780

10 ай бұрын

And more astonishing is they get to call it 'science' & yet "hypothetical particles yet to be observed" mean it is just verbal diarrhea.

@joblo497

10 ай бұрын

Pure imagination ⚡

@ernestgary6812

10 ай бұрын

​@@joblo497yes "made up"

@derreckwalls7508

10 ай бұрын

Science is the most collaborative effort of mankind. If only politics worked the same way we'd solve the world's problems in a couple decades.

@insanepykl3603

10 ай бұрын

Evolution in action. We just didn’t evolve from monkeys

Finally a wonderful and accessible explanation of what the Higgs Boson and the rest of the particles and their essence are, so accessible that someone explains hard to remember.

Outstanding clarity on a difficult topic-- well done!

This was done in enough plain english for me to get a grasp. It is mostly science magic to me but I still find it fascinating. thanks for the fun update :)

@andrewpinkham9904

10 ай бұрын

Im in the same boat as you. I wonder how much turns out to be a fact. Im very skeptical that the big bang will turn out to be a fact. It seems too simple. Considering what we just heard about subatomic particles im even more skeptical

@davidwaynemain

22 күн бұрын

They virtually created that little blast the shrimp kick produces but micro-microscopically. As above so below kinda formula 😂

@diji5071

12 күн бұрын

Yeah bottom line is, there's no fckn way the universe happened at random.

3:48 “now, this is where things become tricky” 😂

Even in seemingly chaotic systems like a flowing river, there are still patterns and structures that emerge. For example, vortices and eddies form because the flow of water is governed by physical laws that produce these patterns. And the Fibonacci sequence, with its spiral shapes, is a great example of how patterns emerge even in apparently random processes. It's really amazing to think that even something as simple as the flow of water can give rise to such complex and beautiful patterns and also patterns from the sea of the universe on nature and our physical world.

@frailvoid5844

8 ай бұрын

@@RepentandbelieveinJesusChrist Satan is our true savior and the one who truly loves us, you are very misguided as jesus was the true evil that tarnished (attempted) Satan's reputation. You have much to learn, simple chld.

@justsaiyan8678

8 ай бұрын

Everything perceivable in this universe exists on a spectrum as a fractal. If you magnify cells or atoms they will mirror larger objects like planets and moons and suns. You need to understand this first….then once you do, you will start to look @ the world differently. Temet Nosce

@frailvoid5844

7 ай бұрын

@@justsaiyan8678 This sounds interesting, do you have any good sources for learning about this?

@justsaiyan8678

7 ай бұрын

@@frailvoid5844 Look up Mandelbrot Set, the water study(they prayed over water and froze it and looked at the ice under a microscope) sound resonance, botany(study of plants), Fibonacci sequence etc. Everything natural is tied together somehow and someway, most people have natural biases which causes them to overlook the truth because you can’t be objective if a bias exist. The scientific process is a way to eliminate bias for specific control groups

@akshayumbare9738

7 ай бұрын

These patterns emerge because truely infinite entropy is not created within a closer system like ours. While the world moves towards a truely random state (or so it seems to us), these Eddies and vortices are intermediate states formed.

Love finding out there are errors in how we see things. Its EXTREMELY obvious we are missing several things from our understanding of the universe. Its exciting cause it confirms there is more to learn and discover. It would be super boring if we ever figured out everything

@user-pm2ry1dx5t

7 ай бұрын

❤

I can actually hear that hum. Ive been able to my whole life. It comes from all directions with the same intensity and never stops.

@howtoadultbygrandma

Ай бұрын

Me too

@snowlight388

26 күн бұрын

I actually truly can too.

@snowlight388

26 күн бұрын

It's been undescribable to those who can't feel it. It's more of a feel type thing.

Firstly Gravitational wave background and now this, a lot of exciting physics is knocking at the door.

@robotaholic

10 ай бұрын

It's not at all like the cosmic microwave background radiation because the gravitational waves come from supermassive black holes and neutron stars colliding and those would have already had to exist before the Big Bang of course

@thesciencenetworktr

10 ай бұрын

It definitely is

@ConstipatedTree

10 ай бұрын

He’s coming.

@maofria1452

10 ай бұрын

Neutrine background too

@mstone1212

10 ай бұрын

What if the higs bosons partials don't dissipate? What if it collided with the higgs explanation and makes a new newtron that we can't see ? Like a envelope? Send fold sent ?

As a lay person this was so excellently explained that I could follow what was explained.. Thank you… As Neil de Grasse had mentioned.. to promote interest in Science.. it’s important to make it easy to explain complex science concepts ( for non scientists) so that the average person’s understanding is enhanced and helps stoke the interest in science. This person has done a marvelous job here.

@gerardmoloney433

9 ай бұрын

Why are you listening to Neil DeGrasse? He thinks everything came from nothing😂. And as an atheist, he admitted that he is not intelligently designed. BE careful who you listen to. Maranatha

@Andy_Paris

9 ай бұрын

​@@gerardmoloney433That is so strange that he said that, makes me believe he's either ignorant, or spreading a false paradigm intentionally, because I read a book on the human genome just for fun at the age of 16, and every scientist who was involved believes that something definitely created us. For example, the reason they believe this, is that they found some of our DNA was purposefully "turned off." (meaning, nature could not have done this) That book was written in the 90s, and when I went to find it again through Amazon, it's no longer available for sale. There was some very impactful discoveries made, one of them being aging, so maybe people like him doesn't want that information to become common knowledge.

@JeremyMacDonald1973

9 ай бұрын

Neil DeGrasse Tyson is an atheist but it is inaccurate to characterize his belief as one where we come from nothing. First off no reputable scientist will say that. The reality is there is a point a fraction of a second after the Big Bang where our model of physics and our tools of observation simply cannot penetrate. What was there at the moment of the Big Bang or before the Big Bang is simply unknowable with our current level of technology and knowledge. Maybe one day we will have more evidence around this. However, this statement is particularly wrong in the case of Neil DeGrasse Tyson. Possibly influenced by String Theory, Neil DeGrasse Tyson's pet hypothesis is that the Big Bang is the creation of a Black Hole in another Dimension and that this process happens all the time. Our Black Holes create Big Bangs in still other Dimensions. Two points regarding this. The First is that he readily accepts that this is a pet Hypothesis. He is not going around claiming that it is proven science. The second is that I know that this was his belief because he outlined it as his favourite explanation during the airing of Cosmos. That series was brilliant but is around a decade old now so he may have changed his views. I personally think it is a poor explanation because, IMO, String Theory has been an absolute failure. We have never successfully found any evidence that it has any basis within reality and this after more then 30 years of trying to prove it including a very large number of experiments with the various particle colliders around the world. For thirty years proponents of String Theory have made predictions along the lines of "If String Theory is true then we should see this interaction..." and we never do. At this point there is absolutely no evidence that there are any other Dimensions out there given how much effort has been put into finding evidence of them that has failed. I'll change my tune if someone finds some actual evidence but so far we have tried long and hard and found zip so I am leaning hard toward the idea that it is a dead end - there is nothing out there to find.

@JeremyMacDonald1973

9 ай бұрын

"That book was written in the 90s, and when I went to find it again through Amazon, it's no longer available for sale. There was some very impactful discoveries made, one of them being aging, so maybe people like him doesn't want that information to become common knowledge". By the late '90s and into the early 2000's the power of our computers and our ability to interact with DNA increased exponentially. In the early 90's a major experiment to modify DNA would have cost well over $100,000 and taken a team of scientists around a yer to complete. These days we can do the same thing for less then $1000 and it will take about 6 hours. This computing power along with the Human Genome Project changed a huge amount around our views of how genetics worked. The most striking example was, on the eve that the Human Genome Project was going to be released, scientists around the world where taking bets (not all of them of course but it is a common story) about how much more DNA we would have then a lab mouse (one of the few animals we had already mapped out). So they where betting we would have 10 times more DNA or 20 times more DNA etc. Basically all of them lost. We are not more complex then a mouse. We are barely more complex then a fly. Want to know what has a lot of DNA? A Cactus. An Onion has an absolute ton as well as do many other plants. Far more then us and the mouse. What was assumed was that the more complex a creature was the more DNA it would have but that is simply not true... or maybe it is true but we failed to realize why Plants need to be more complex then us. See Humans and pretty much all the other animals have a very simple mechanism for dealing with their environment. If this place where you are is a bad place then leave this place. Pretty much all animals have that ability - if it sucks where I am go someplace else. Cactus can't do that. They need an actual adaptation in the DNA to express a solution for every bad thing that might happen to them in their environment and that is true of pretty much all the plants. Hence they have much more DNA. You can't find your book because its full of information that is clearly out of date so it is not being printed anymore. For example you mentioned that DNA can't be turned off but that is exactly how we learned evolution worked from this experiment. A Chicken does not have more DNA then its Dinosaur ancestors - it has more or less exactly the same amount of DNA. What has actually happened is that different parts of the DNA are turned on and other parts turned off as well as timing has turned out to be very important. All this timing and different elements being turned off and on is actually one of the major ways more complex life evolves. Your average Bacteria or Virus is big on mutations and the like but more complex creatures do that a whole lot less. One of the things that this means, and it is being explored, is that almost all the DNA for that Chicken's Dinosaur ancestor is still there. If we can figure out what bits to prod and when, we can literally artificially create its ancient ancestor, sharp teeth, claws and all. Now that said I don't think we know what Dinosaur Chickens evolved from so this would be interesting to find out. As a side note this is where the expression 'Rare as Hens Teeth" comes from. Very rarely there is a screw up in the reading the Chickens DNA and Chickens are born with teeth... because their ancient ancestors had sharp teeth and the DNA to express that is still there.

@D0BR0VECE

9 ай бұрын

@@JeremyMacDonald1973 Thank you for your TED talk sir. I thoroughly enjoyed it.

Measurements with advanced computing while integrating new theoretical physics such as Distance Time Theory would have a beneficial impact especially regarding the human body’s relationship with observed/non observed particles as it pertains both to Earth physics and to laws outside of its atmosphere(s).

The back pedaling out of the ridiculous direction quantum physics took is going to be excruciatingly slow and pretentious. Evidence herein.

This explanation looks simple enough to be understood by some highschool students. EXCELLENT

@mikemondano3624

10 ай бұрын

Don't feel bad. You and the author are not the only ones who have no idea what any of this means. Disinformation is everywhere. The COMPUTER VOICE shows this was just made for money.

@fredjones7705

10 ай бұрын

Np...explanation by analogy is not explanation. If you cannot do the mathematics then you cannot really understand it.

@mikemondano3624

10 ай бұрын

@@fredjones7705 P ≠ NP.

@Jason-cz3bv

8 ай бұрын

@@fredjones7705You must fart at the exact same time it collides.

I like how 1800s they were thinking it’s a “aether” which was disproven and then in some round about way we come back to it

@howtoadultbygrandma

Ай бұрын

I didn't think they ever proved the theory of aether was wrong?? Me and Tesla still believe. That's how witches get power and ghosts can run around....aether

@wisskier

Күн бұрын

Similarly, "dark matter" has an "epicycles" feel to it, at least to me. I think this all points to an inadequacy of our current mathematics.

Can we produce higgs bosons yet using z bosons produced from positron and electron collisions yet? How close are we to developing a higgs or z boson source?

Excellent means of discribing this event and all that occurs.

The way I see this, the Higgs boson pops in so to speak at high energy events, it more or less decays when the energy isn't there to sustain or lengthen it. Think of it like a bullet hitting a large solid steel piece of metal that doesn't move. But in this case the metal would essentially heal itself, like nothing happened. I think once we get into even greater energy collisions I think the Higgs boson will stick around a little longer with more "waves". Basically I think the energy release is more or less hitting something unknown.

Its so exciting when we find out that we were not as correct as we thought. It means we are about to be more correct.

@11C1P

10 ай бұрын

Not necessarily.

@jimvozheer3744

10 ай бұрын

It means we are about to be less wrong.

@Lund.J

10 ай бұрын

"as correct as we thought" Who is this "we" ? Why did "we" thought that "we" were correct ? Does the herd bring "correct" ? Name, "god particle", shows the attitude which is insane. Priests of particle physics and their liturgy.

@neonparadise3095

10 ай бұрын

or not.

@xenphoton5833

10 ай бұрын

You may be incorrect about that 😁

Great stuff. Learned a lot

Outstanding clarity on a difficult _topic_well done ❤

So glad there are excellent visualizations and explanations of these concepts from a reputable scientific source.... thank you!

@gonegahgah

10 ай бұрын

🙄

@cjbrenner13

8 ай бұрын

What source? 😂

It seems like every ounce of space can hold every possibility. Between scalar fields, electron fields, Higgs fields and probably dimensional field possibilities; wave/particle duality may be explored by acknowledging that Higgs field can be every foundational particle.

@darylburnet8328

10 ай бұрын

wank, wank

@johnnicol8598

9 ай бұрын

There is no wave-particle duality. Only misunderstanding.

@donaldduck830

9 ай бұрын

"It seems like every ounce of space can hold every possibility. " Yes. Every ounce of space is filled with zeropoint energy. A layman's description of this was the "Dirac Sea" of endless potential and waves. Pity that this model has been cast aside, I always loved the picture. Great that with Higgs, this picture is being reused.

@jaymschow6457

9 ай бұрын

They just don't wanna develop scalar physics and open to public, it will never make physics go step forward or just keep us looping in what data we get on hand, adjust it again and again 😂

@paulthomas963

Ай бұрын

Garbage. The quantum field, the one that actually provable exists already does that.

This could be confirmation of "the more we know, the more we don't know".

Is gravitational waves that was detected is same as ripples if higs field?

I don’t understand any of this but I love it.

@jimmythebold589

10 ай бұрын

that's unfortunate. apparently the creator of the video failed in explaining these concepts. he tried to reduce it to real world concepts, like swimming in a pool. is it possible that you failed to look at the analogy and are just intimidated by any discussion of science. i suggest that you abandon that fear and bias. especially if you're interested in videos like this, which, apparently you are. stop telling yourself that you're dumb. you aren't. these concepts aren't complex, in fact, they're kinda simple. ignore the word soup. i'm just trying to encourage you. none of this stuff , at a layperson's level, is that complicated. at any rate, i'm glad that you just love science, even if you're confused about understanding simple concepts about it. perhaps look into other channels where concepts are discussed in deeper depth,

@Critical.J

2 ай бұрын

Hadron - Had you on, Anagram, Hard On.......The Large hard on.....lol......It's a joke.....THey are taking the piss

It seems the higgs field could be compared to the past concept of the luminiferous aether, a universal frame of reference. Could anyone point out to me how the concepts are misaligned?

@hilarydrinkwater5392

10 ай бұрын

yeah, sure the "Hearth of God" in the Hebrew Bible names an angel, yet the earliest source is unclear. In clarity, Ariel is the whole of the bibliography of everything

@Blindseeker82033

10 ай бұрын

@@hilarydrinkwater5392 You may have replied to the wrong comment somehow?

@darylburnet8328

10 ай бұрын

Sure, Einstein failed and so does modern Science. The Frame of Reference is all wrong.

@RichWoods23

10 ай бұрын

Just read up on the old idea of the aether and you'll see how it's not comparable to the Higgs field.

@gonegahgah

10 ай бұрын

Field theory is just a different type of æther theory but with multiple overlapping æthers. We just can't disconnect ourselves from things having to be directly connected.

What an excellent and informative video - thanks..

Amazing what Scintillators can do. I remind myself that nothing is discovered until it stands still enough to be discovered. Otherwise it moves faster than can be measured.

Hoggs and Bison are pretty good barbecued on the grill :)

@snowlight388

26 күн бұрын

😂 damn right ✅️

This video is brilliant, thank you guys.

@darylburnet8328

10 ай бұрын

wank, wank

Firstly gravitational wave background and now this a lot of exciting physics is knocking at the door

I feel like the analogy breaks down when you get to the Higgs Boson itself. If the Higgs Boson is a "wave" created in the Higgs field it shouldn't be a particle or decay into other particles. It should also show up more frequently if we accelerated heavy particles without actually needing the collision. It almost seems like the Higgs Boson is a bubble formed in the field and new particles are made by compressing residual energy in the collapse of the bubble. Like some kind lf quantum cavitation.

@NuniqueNewNork

2 ай бұрын

like there is more than one dimension of time, interacting with the 3 or 4 vectors of energy, to create an illusion of instant particles... I asked folks to try a 5d vector math, with the assumption that all of space is a bubble, and we can't perceive the energy without interacting with the bubbles formed by the vectors. I think I need to sleep

Maybe these particular decays occur at the predicted rate, but are more readily detected in the collider?

@recursiveslacker7730

8 ай бұрын

Now you’re thinking like a scientist. Always rule out instrumentation errors or assumptions about your measurement methods.

@paulthomas963

Ай бұрын

Or, gosh maybe these things don't exist naturally and are being created temporarily by smashing protons together at the speed of light.

I was seriously disappointed they didn’t talk about what the decay process was, and what made it significant. It was just a “hey we found new shot, just believe us” video. There have been multiple 3+ sigma deviations that were false positives. This just seems like more CERN PR to get funding for a bigger collider. Seeing too many of these types of videos by CERN itself, as well as “gullible” pop science sites.

@m.starro9015

3 ай бұрын

exactly, this is just a promotional video

It goes far beyond that what I can understand. I have one question though. These particles are measured with components made by human hand and therefore subject to physical processes which are rough compared to what they are measuring. Such as measuring the width of a hair with a meterstick. How can the outcome be so precise. Or does the outcome only exists in models and animations, are scientists sure that something that exists only x time -10^22 isn’t a glitch of an electron somewhere in a processor?

@BobHenderson-dr2wy

6 ай бұрын

What they are saying is that they know their measuring is imprecise at that level but their statistical model says that out of every 10,000 collisions you would or should have X amount of deviations, but instead they measure a lot more deviations, which means their model isn't correct. It means there are interaction on the thing they considered the fabric of space/time itself. Electrons glitching is a lot like old analog TV static when you would turn to a channel that didn't exist. You of course always knew when you were looking at a real channel because it was obvious, the something definable vs the absence of something. If they did glitch then we couldn't have electron microscopes, or we would at least detect it, in every number of images.

The animations are cool. What software is used?

@TheScarbro970

8 ай бұрын

Artificial Intelligence

Ever noticed how the realm of physics, from which the concept stems, never seem to consider the observer might be CAUSING the results? As I recall, the multiverse & supersymmetry models had differing predictions for the Higgs. 1 said it had to be 140 GeV & the other said 115 GeV. Atlas & CMS both came in with an anomaly at 126 GeV. Somehow this was declared a triumph yet the science I learned said if you predict something & it doesn't show up you go back to finding a new hypothesis. Now we have explanations for Higgs decay involving "hypothetical particles yet to be observed" as if this is a rational explanation. To me it sounds more like the kind of magic a medium would use - "the ghost will talk to us through ectoplasm - you can't see it or know it is there but that's how ghosts work!" I guess when you make up magic because your basic theory doesn't produce the right results, (Inflation, Dark Matter, Dark Energy anyone?) it's not much of a leap to relying on yet another "hypothetical particles yet to be observed" - DM anyone? No wonder Fauci got away with claiming he is 'the science' - everyone seems WAY too eager to ignore actual scientific method!

@bowevanko450

10 ай бұрын

love seeing people call out psuedoscience.

@mmerri9780

8 ай бұрын

If you know the "true scientific method" Make a prediction, set up an experiment and publish you results.

@markmcd2780

8 ай бұрын

@@mmerri9780- Agreed, except you left out the part of performing the experiment then showing how the results prove the hypothesis. The problem with the Higgs issue, to which I presume you refer, is the results DISPROVE both hypotheses - i.e. the 'predictions' were shown incorrect. But they published as a success anyway.

Could a Higgs boson, under the right conditions in coocetion with the Higgs field, decompose into a theoretical particle by the name of a Tachyon?

@paranoidandroid6711

10 ай бұрын

A tachyon if it existed could only travel greater than the speed a light and never slower.

@jameshoey303

9 ай бұрын

You are almost correct. The new particle is called Fred Durst

This video is brillant. Thank you guys.

The nature of nature is completely fascination. An excellent story of what mite be; sometimes.

You know, you might make things easier to understand, and thereby more easy to see connections. If you named the particles more appropriately. Just sayin

@nickbroughton928

10 ай бұрын

Not that that's directed at any "you" in particular. I apologize for my direct comments.

@darylburnet8328

10 ай бұрын

Correct, when they find the Wank particle I might get excited

Question: My mind went in many directions during this video, but most notably I realized a decaying Higgs boson has a vibration frequency that breaks down the particle. What if we didn't want it to break down? Like say using some kind of sonic frequency generator? Would that create static stable frequency particle wave that we could use to carry a data signal/transmission on? Would it have to be in the absence of a gravity well and a vacuum for those ripples / particle waves to remain constant?

@garyduchscher8603

10 ай бұрын

I don't know the answer that's up to God

@RichWoods23

10 ай бұрын

You are spewing out words which bear no relation to each other. Have you no sense of scale, no understanding even of comparably simple things like sound and gravity?

@Fluke2SS

10 ай бұрын

@@RichWoods23If sound can be used to break glass, can it not be used to stabilize particle vibration such that the ripples created by the reaction remain constant and without breaking down the Higgs Boson? And to answer your question I do, and if you had any logical thought and common sense, you would know gravity doesn't work the same at the quantum level as it does in traditional physics, so to alleviate any effect a Gravity well may have on the Higgs Boson, it probably should be done in a vacuum such that other particles in the medium do not interact with the particle wave and in the absence of a gravity well for the same reason. As an example: Fiber Optics: Multimode fibers (both Step and Graded Index types) are hermetically sealed into a stainless steel shell, using the latest in glass-ceramic bonding technology. Standard fiber optic feedthroughs are terminated with premium SMA 905 connectors on both the vacuum and air sides. The only real trick after that is rather or not one can eliminate the presence of gravitational effects given this particle lives at the quantum level.

@RichWoods23

10 ай бұрын

@@Fluke2SS "If sound can be used to break glass, can it not be used to stabilize particle vibration such that the ripples created by the reaction remain constant and without breaking down the Higgs Boson?" No, which is why I said you have no understanding of scale. Go on, ask yourself: what is sound? How is sound carried? Think it through. As for gravity, if you had a clue what you were talking about, you'd realise that a particle which exists for less than a zeptosecond is barely going to have time to be affected by gravity, and in any case particle decay is not -- to the best of our current knowledge -- subject to gravity. How do you plan to create a region free of gravity? Every particle with mass has a gravitational field and its reach is potentially infinite. You'd have to magically empty the universe and then wait for billions of years so that the warping of space-time had time to also end. I don't think you understand that a vacuum isn't absolute. You are not going to be able to remove all fermions from it and you're going to struggle to remove bosons from it too! In any case I refer you to my question: what is sound? You contradict yourself. I can only think that you have latched onto fibre optics as an example because you don't understand that what you describe there is just one way of achieving total internal reflection, something which is fine for photons by not for the Higgs. Bloody hell, just go read a physics book for once in your life.

@venomousspecifics45

9 ай бұрын

Well, this went down hill quickly. Generally, people don’t learn if you shout at them or call them names -- it’s very stressful for the prospective learner and extremely rude. I have been teaching physics over 15 years now and have only encouraged a handful of “stupid” questions - which usually occur because someone zoned out for 20 minutes and then wants to talk about an assignment that we just finished discussing (and that’s really an inconveniently timed question, I talk wth that student after class and bring them back up to speed). I’ve never encountered a stupid question from a curious learner. So, back to the original question about sound: good for you for trying to connect multiple ideas! What do you remember about sound? (We’d have a conversation here in we were chatting together.) I think you’d start with the idea of things vibrating, which is an excellent start. So how does sound travel through the air? Hopefully, after some more discussion, I’d guide you toward sound being a pressure wave. It causes air molecules to move back and forth. Now, let’s think about air: what is air made of? Mostly nitrogen N_2 gas and oxygen and a few other things. Although these are small molecules, they are much, much bigger than (in both size and mass) than particles like the Higgs, electron, etc. Any sound wave is unable to interact with something so small. And that’s way sound won’t work, but it was a good question. Questions are how we learn new tings and how we integrate new knowledge into our existing knowledge base. I’m sorry you got yelled at. Any follow up questions?

Physics and the mechanism of movement remain insufficient to comprehend the entire universe, but it explains some of its aspects accurately and solves many problems, as long as science represents a passion for me. The topic is wonderful. Thank you.

Either the expected mass of the Higgs field is wrong or the observation chambers of the colliders themselves are measuring collision reflection in the Higgs field which is being interpreted by the collider detectors as Higgs boson along with the other decay particles.

Im honestly surprised that people still think that there will be a limit to what we can discover. the universe is limitless no matter which way we look - micro or macro. as a matter of fact, we (awareness) are the ones creating while seeking and observing.

@au5music

8 ай бұрын

It’s just a game we play that creates an illusion of progression through technological innovation, a game that most forget they’re playing and convince themselves that inward couldn’t ever be the way out

WHOAAA is that Kingpin's super collider at 2:05?? I thought Miles destroyed that thing ages ago!!!

Can someone explain what the end goal of this research is? What would these studies prove or progress?

@m.starro9015

3 ай бұрын

world domination is the end goal

Cylindrical reflection surface causes rapid vibration of the Higgs field oscillation causing the self immolation should angle it more kinda like a shallow suppressor baffle to force the wave to propagate along the direction of atomic fragmentation to examine the reoccurrence of multiple Higgs resonance

The cited press release says they have 3.4 standard deviations, less than the usual 5 standard deviations required to avoid getting excited about hallucinations caused by luck. The right next step is to wait for them to get more data and either get to 5 standard deviations or for things to regress to the mean and the hallucination goes away.

@rogervonschleusingen4603

9 ай бұрын

VERY WELL PRESENTED PROFESSOR, YOU DA MAN !!

@ezrollerj

8 ай бұрын

its enough to entice investors with no understanding of even basic math

@tim57243

8 ай бұрын

@@ezrollerj Which investors do you have in mind? I don't know how to invest in the Higgs boson or field.

@ezrollerj

8 ай бұрын

@@tim57243 its well beyond accessible by us peasants. we're partially invested through taxes either way...

@MrDino1953

8 ай бұрын

@@tim57243- they are called tax payers.

The age , size, quatity , quality , colour, shape , angle of particles are very significance in studying these researches.

@treadwell1917

9 ай бұрын

Color of the particles? 😂

Wow how intriguing I feel that much closer to understanding reality😊

I hope some really smart physicist can postulate a theory of everything then be so-o smart that he/she can explain it to the rest of us. The second part is the hardest.

@darylburnet8328

10 ай бұрын

Einstein tried and failed. The only real answer lies in Jesus who has Eternity to explain it all to us. Simple.

@gonegahgah

10 ай бұрын

I hope we meet another race of beings out there who say "What are you guys on?"

@norbertnagy5514

10 ай бұрын

​@@darylburnet8328But the "easy" answer is not necesarilly the most correct a lot of the times

@min-tq6ys

10 ай бұрын

im not a smart physicist but heres a try, the very example of theory of everything is our very own planet earth, its atmosphere, gravity, the sea, the land, the climate, the moon, the core and the earthquake and other calamity is how earth breathes connected at some point and the reason why we are given chance to be created and destroyed even, and we are part of that, as the miniature version of what we so called "life"., theory of everything seems to be pointing at creation, and if its creation then its about functionality, and functionality in physics turn into layman is a creature which makes it a living being, so its life in the end. (and in the beginning again)

@bengardener8928

9 ай бұрын

Time-space-gravity only exist/ is experienced/ perceivable only to things that are comprised of matter. Things like quantum entanglement are not so strange if the particles that appear to us to be entangled, from their perspective, were never separate due to experiencing space and time differently. Prior to the big bang we are often told all of the matter in the universe was at a single, dense point, but in reality, before the big bang no matter existed, therefore there no space existed for that single dense point" to exist in and no time either. Those things are simply things only matter can experience and perceive and "space/distance" cannot exist without matter.

Nowadays it feels like physics is being rewritten on a daily basis, if I was still in high school, I wouldn't even bother to learn this science 😂

@purrple.shadows

10 ай бұрын

Learning this science helps make new discoveries more meaningful.

@610Hobbies

10 ай бұрын

@@purrple.shadows But those discoveries are meaningless if they're wrong, right?

@purrple.shadows

10 ай бұрын

@@610Hobbies Well finding out something is wrong leads to more experiments to determine what IS true.

@sidsuspicious

10 ай бұрын

@@610Hobbies A huge part of science is finding out what doesn't work, that is vital information when zeroing in on a problem. You already know what doesn't work so you don't have to waste your time endlessly repeating what others have already found to be fruitless.

@satanicmicrochipv5656

10 ай бұрын

Apparently you didn't bother learning science back when you were in highschool, or you'd know how the Scientific Method works. So I guess that worked out for you, eh? A photon checks into a hotel. The bellhop asks the photon if it has any luggage. The photon replies... "No, I'm traveling light."

Great work

Physics is one of the few sciences where they start off only knowing about 5% of what is there and the more they learn the higher the percentage of what they don't know goes up.

@thomascunningham2919

4 ай бұрын

That, to me, is exactly how science should be

Makes you wonder...what do we really know, if anything at all??🤔

@purrple.shadows

10 ай бұрын

We know a lot but there's always more to find out.

@pangeaproxima3681

10 ай бұрын

@@purrple.shadows no shit, really?

@purrple.shadows

10 ай бұрын

@@pangeaproxima3681 Some people think we know nothing.

@Google-McGoogle

10 ай бұрын

Popcorn 🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿

@BenjaminMilekowsky

10 ай бұрын

The more we know the more we lost, that's our knowledge about universe

What if the laws of physics are dynamic, albeit slowly over time, and we're chasing stationary answers to an evolving system

@Mr.Jetson

7 ай бұрын

What if our very understanding of physics actually interacts and changes physics. As if our consciousness dictates reality itself 🤯

@fknGandalf

7 ай бұрын

@@Mr.Jetson I mean, that's probably going down too

Amazing video good work 😊

Wow very good video you have made very well you are explaining what is in the world

There is " new " physics evident in the now acknowledged craft in our skies. It is a must conclusion based on the characteristics these craft display. :O)

I pray we can keep learning. My hope is we may stumble into spiritual answers through scientific research.

@zzanatos2001

9 ай бұрын

I believe God thoroughly hides his existence because this life is nothing but a test of faith. If God's existence was a proven fact, it would destroy spiritual faith.

@carolcrone9387

9 ай бұрын

God is always there, you just have to acknowledge Him.

This is so good information for my study and my research

Great explanation👌👌

To me, a European citizen moderately interested in science, this sounds like a commercial. And I feel these folks want to see a particle in everything, because LHC. "If the only tool you've got is a hammer, everything just has to be a nail" comes to mind. I want the European parliament to assess what went into this, what came out and what we can realistically expect in terms of practical applications. "But it's science!". Yeah, right. I'm all for that. But this is really expensive science, there is a lot to be investigated and there's only one pool of money. Do we need more of the same? How much of the LHC budget goes into securing funds for more of this? Isn't this very video a testament of the monster this has become?

@m.starro9015

3 ай бұрын

exactly, and it is starting to feel like a very dangerous monster

@paulthomas963

Ай бұрын

Amen, cancel the LHC!!!! That money can be spent better on other science.

At Σ 3.9, isn't that like a 1/10000 chance of being wrong still? So, highly likely that the experiment data is accurate. Not 100% but significantly high enough to be considered accurate.

@ezrollerj

8 ай бұрын

10000 times more research money. 😁

@davepastern

8 ай бұрын

@@ezrollerj oh wow. Stop trolling.

@paddyoak1

8 ай бұрын

Ahh, close enough.

So Michael Phelps is massless I'm a dork/quark in a pool. And the HB particle lifespan is shorter than my last attempt at quitting smoking, which didn't ever happen. One question where/how/when does the neutron dance come into play in all this

The substance is a new element,can only be seen by a diamond microscope when a visual is used with that particular gem

they are likely going to find that the amount of energy put into the collision affects the higgs decay rate. My guess this is why they are upping the power for the next batch of expierments. Personally I think they altered time somehow with the 2018 runs. Alot of people agree, something more happened.

IA working well... on this matter and the results in certain area... are indeed INCREDIBLE. AND not to mention the fact of the creation of language models created ONLY for physics... AND THIS IS AMAZING.

Great explanation.

So we don’t have to worry about catastrophic vacuum decay? Excellent!

@paulthomas963

Ай бұрын

lmao. I'm sorry but the fact that was a real theory and anyone believed it... *facepalm*

Interesting, they've spent so many years denying the existence of aether yet now they explain it with a different name.

@bowevanko450

10 ай бұрын

preach

@__Tazzzo

9 ай бұрын

The Higgs field isn't a medium; it's a field of energy. In the late 1800s, scientists conceived of the aether as a way to explain how light spreads through space.

@paulthomas963

Ай бұрын

It's not even the correct aether. We already have the quantum background field in GFT which is for all purposes the aether (with no drag). There is no Higgs.

I'm going to go against convention again like I did 2 or more years ago on the so called god particle and say it ain't gravitational waves but electromagnetic waves.

@RichWoods23

10 ай бұрын

Electric Universe idiot alert!

@paulthomas963

Ай бұрын

Yeah I'm highly skeptical either gravitational waves or Higgs exist at all. There's just the Quantum field, and it's electromagnetic.

Thank you for not spending the first half hour describing the collider itself and why it was created. Those videos are so frustrating.

Very informative

The god particle is contained within all things. In humans, a stone, a tree, the air, rain and sun. Stop trying to capture what is not yours. Learn to accept this beautiful creation and stop messing with it.

@crystalclear5684

10 ай бұрын

The 'God particle' is contained also in the sacred 🍄🍄🍄... 🖖

"Excuse me, i believe your lepton is on my boson."

Perfect info❤

Excellent job done👍👌👍

Pops in and out of existence by converting to energy or attaching to a larger particle for stablity or both.

I get lost on the virtual particles ..... can''t get my mind around that one yet

In other words a "byproduct" needed for and created by that process however dissipated quickly to maintain efficiency of action without lingering negative reaction.

Very informative video

How did they not see this coming

Here I was thinking we had things pinned down and come to find out the particle was a moving target.

Duration timing/ time it rakes to convert is off Not % of particles changed. Radioactive particle decay rates 😊

Is the effect the same with DD buslims? Or F buslims?

This is amazing

Nice information

I've just found something super interesting, I will be back shortly to check this out.

Where does that 1.6X10-22 fall in comparison to Planck time?

So the particles are broken down to the point where they become a trait of matter? Higgs is the right frequency to measure the aspects of atoms? Oh btw, they should try the partical accelerator except collide the particles inside a bose Einstein condensate. The higgs half life will be preceived for longer study

Great and excellent job

Well done

If the Higgs is responsible for mass and mass is what causes gravity, then the disintegration of a Higgs into a disturbance of the electro-magnetic field (aka a photon) means there is a connection somewhere between gravity and electro-magnetism.

@michaelwilliams2430

8 ай бұрын

There is a connection between everything. Thus the quest for a unified theory.

@paulthomas963

Ай бұрын

Quantum fluctuations do that not Higgs. But yes gravity is probably some shadow effect of EM or interactions with quantized EM fields. If you start with QFT/QED you can get relativity out of it. Forget string theory.

Informative