the price is way too high for the current quality of models. 99.9% of these can't be used in anything professional and would need significant work. It would probably be faster to just make them from scratch than try to fix them.

“Bring creators 3d vision to life” more like ai vision. We have enough lazy 2d images no need to bring it into 3d.

@sarcasticb22

17 күн бұрын

Photography is "lazy", I mean, you just point a camera and take pictures, right? And don't even get me started on digital art. These lazy people can't even be bothered to MIX THEIR PAINT and have a PROGRAM do it... Putting the sarcasm aside, AI is simply another lense for human creativity. The outcome of mediocrity is a user fault, not the tool itself.

@TheDitriht

16 күн бұрын

@@sarcasticb22 Of course there’s no reason to blame AI, its just maths and codes. But then tool can do everything by just single click makes it not a tool, but worker. But anyway, I think humanity isn’t ready for this kind of tech yet.

@tobbyman3d

16 күн бұрын

@@sarcasticb22 You don't know shoot about photography and digital art and it shows

@sarcasticb22

16 күн бұрын

@@tobbyman3d I understand your reading comprehension is rather low... But I said "putting the sarcasm aside". Do you know what sarcasm is? Perhaps GPT can help you with that?

@tobbyman3d

16 күн бұрын

@@sarcasticb22 You were being sarcastic but you were using it to bring the advent of photography and digital art into comparison with generative AI

In all honesty, it still looks bad and u have not enough control over final product. I'm still waiting when we have more AI tools to help in creation process, then AI who focus on giving us a "final" product. Tbh i don't understand this pursue for finish art, models etc. We need more tools like Cascadeur.

@CGDive

17 күн бұрын

That is very true. I don't use a lot of AI tools. The ones I do use are generally just part of the process. They help with a specific task while I maintain control of the project.

@Cryunreal

16 күн бұрын

because you are too expensive for production

@CGDive

16 күн бұрын

@@Cryunreal who is too expensive?

@spooderderg4077

16 күн бұрын

AI can and will only get better. The main issue right now is the people making the ai23d models refuse to let them work with LoRAS or dreambooths, meaning all the really cool stuff SD users can do to customize their pipeline are not available.

@Cryunreal

15 күн бұрын

@@CGDive you. Human =)

If generative AI tech keep advancing, it's good for artists that have stories to tell, bad for art specialists, such as pure modelers, animators, riggers, etc...

@yudhinugraha5876

10 күн бұрын

Say's who Ai can't generate a story?

@andthe.infinite

3 күн бұрын

you can ask chat gpt to make a sermon

May this works with drawn images without colour just black silhouette and white fill colour?

@CGDive

17 күн бұрын

I haven't tried that. I would guess that it is optimized for more standard color images

Expect more devs like Palworld devs to use this tool to make their own version of Pokemons. Creativity will vanish in 1-2 year completely.

@CGDive

16 күн бұрын

Creativity will vanish because of a version of Pokemon? I don't follow to be honest.

@A.P.0000

16 күн бұрын

​@@CGDive One of the possible outcomes of AI is the loss of many human skills, including creativity. It will be a gradual process though, if it happens it will take more than one or two years. But it is a very possible scenario. AI may end up becoming a boon for creative processes but in this current climate i expect it to be other way around.

@marcelluscor7917

16 күн бұрын

Ignore him. He's just salty about pokemon being usurped by Palworld's success.

@spooderderg4077

16 күн бұрын

@@CGDive Palworld didn't even use AI in the game. Dude's just mad the game of the year was made by 10 dudes just having fun.

Gross, guess things will be so easy soon we wont need youtubers telling us how to do it anymore.

@CGDive

17 күн бұрын

that's a possibility for sure :) I am actually excited about this future even though it means I would lose my "job". And I mean not so much that the tools will do all of the work. I actually don't believe that. I mean more that we may get AI assistants that really provide good info so you don't need to circle around the internet to find out how to do what you need to do.

@menso3852

17 күн бұрын

​@@CGDive might just get into gardening

@CGDive

17 күн бұрын

@@menso3852 hah

@JarrodMedrano

14 күн бұрын

At this rate there will be an app to make your own youtuber and you just tell it to make videos on any topic for you

The fuck is this heresy ?

@omiorahman6283

15 күн бұрын

It’s Omnissiah approved

That's some pretty rough topology. But maybe it's a good place to start.

@CGDive

3 күн бұрын

Agreed!

amazing, unlike all the artist I dont hate AI everyone should be able to make art no matter what background, bcz where I am from its almost impossible to being able to give your ideas a vision but now they can. hate all you want but overall its gonna benefit people in need.

How disappointing.

@winxpusr

14 күн бұрын

How so, it's AI generated 3D, it promised trash and delivered exactly that, what is there to be disappointed about?

@LinRinku

13 күн бұрын

​@@winxpusr Lmao, that's fair. I'm more so disappointed in CGDive for promoting such a tool. One could argue that it's a "good first step" for artists, but honestly, I think it'd be far better to start from scratch to learn from the experience, make much better results, and feel more gratified for the work you actually put in to say "I made that!" instead of letting a machine do the work. Like, what's the point of making art with Gen AI? For clout to say you "made something amazing"? Waiting to see "pretty" things from key words that some people claim to be hard to do and "as much work as real artists"? Why can't we put more attention and effort into tools that help with the tedious, repetitive processes in art instead, so artists can put more passion into the bigger things? Like filling up flat colors in 2D animation so you don't have to go frame by frame over and over, adding lines in posed faces like Spider-verse so they can focus on other aspects of animation, using a auto select in software like CSP, and so on. And even then, a human would still need to tweak what the tools did to complete their art. Generative AI takes away the life and connection to a human being behind the art, stealing from actual artists who, more often than not, do not consent to have their works put into a machine that spits out amalgamations of images, audio, or text. That's not even touching on how much it costs the environment to make these abominations. Sorry to reply with a paragraph, lol, but as an artist myself, I'm just saddened to see people that I used to follow, who share knowledge and helps others, turn out to side with Gen AI garbage. You'd think they'd understand why this stuff is not good, but I guess not.

This artists ai tools are forgetting who their clients are

It’s never been easier to achieve mediocrity! =P

Should services scare me more than I see anything positive in them. Nevertheless, I will continue to practice modeling, sculpting, rigging, etc. and would rather do my own things than ever use, let alone support, such crap. Or, as always, your videos are great & educational :)

@CGDive

2 күн бұрын

Definitely, keep practicing. One of my faults is probably that I don't seem to understand people who feel discouraged by the advances of AI. Practicing your art will not hurt you even if AI ends up replacing some parts of the commercial production process.

not cool

You don't have to predict the future to already see the negative effects of AI "creations". Portals like Pinterest have been completely flooded by them, destroying the point of using the portal for many people. Artstation managed to defend itself thanks to a boycott by artists who forced AI products to be tagged. If the same thing happens to 3D... currently, several to several dozen new games are released every day. If AI produces mass models at the click of a button, there will be 5 times more of these games, not to mention 3D animations, of which there will also be a ton. No one will be able to manage it, good works will be lost under the pressure of trash.

I wish there was an ai software that quickly did retopology and prototyping bone rigging or maybe a hyper quick texture baking software

@CGDive

15 күн бұрын

yeah, noone has an issue with that. :)

glad to know that 3d AI is still shit

@DenzelCanvasSupport

7 күн бұрын

not for long sadly

@IvoKlerk

22 сағат бұрын

Yeah I’m thinking 2025 will be the year of 3D A.I. Though that’s a looong time in this field currently, so could be sooner

AI TOOK MAH JOB!!!

@CGDive

8 күн бұрын

OH NOOO!!!!

ai is killing creativity.

@CGDive

16 күн бұрын

I tend to disagree.

@mclovin9478

16 күн бұрын

@@CGDive May I ask why? Ofc just because you have a calculator it doesnt mean that a mathematician is useless.

@CGDive

16 күн бұрын

@@mclovin9478 You answered your own question :) The mathematician uses the calculator. A calculator (or even a computer) doesn't just make everyone a mathematician.

This looks good for fast basemesh. Still a lot of work need by humans. Exiting times!

cascadeur

Far too expensive at the moment. I'll let time and competition find a balanced and a fair price, it's still awesome tech regardless of pricing! I tested it out and it's pretty cool! Might have to keep my eye on this!

@CGDive

17 күн бұрын

Yeah, I think there can be specific type of productions which it is ideal for but certainly not something that is for everyone.

Wow I've been trying off and on over the years to do 3d modeling and rigging this cuts out most the sculpting and retopology it seems

this does seem good for a starting point… or maybe background assets. ngl, if Zbrush or some blender add on does not implement some kind of system like this soon, this AI softwares might start stealing their lunch money

Nice😊

Only matter of time before we have open source free AI generated 3D character add on within blender. AI is moving fast.

@fkdump

15 күн бұрын

That's good, AI should solve some technically boring tasks such as retopology.

Loving the comments like "We'll be out of jobs" "AI is advancing fast" or hate towards this type of machine learning. 1. Many artists today are out of jobs anyway because of studio closures, market shifts, and the economy. 2. It's literally the beginnings of anything remotely resembling to an "AI". Anyone calling machine learning "AI" should refrain from commenting dumb things. It's a marketing term. 3. As a 3D artist working on projects from A to Z, I wish there were tools like automatic assets, automatic animations, automatic everything. I love doing all the technical aspects, but at some point it's repetitive and tiring. I want to spend more time on creativity rather than solving problems all day. So far the first models can imitate humans, create terrible fake images, and now also some form of 3D that you have to manually clean, making this tool a good retopology base, or just useless for now. Thank you Todor for making quality content. Relax people!

@CGDive

12 күн бұрын

You win the comment section on this one! :D

Good enough for background objects.😪😪

We will all be withouth jobs :)

@CGDive

17 күн бұрын

Nah, we'll be fine. But be ready to adapt professionally.

@moonshot3159

17 күн бұрын

so many ignorant artists parroting this sentiment. AI will not replace human creativity don't be a sheep.

@richterdelgan123

17 күн бұрын

​​@@moonshot3159 is inevitable. But they don't take the AI seriously until the banks have for clients people that don't exist. The AI programers are crazy transhumanist cultists, only comparable to the fictional adeptus mecanicus.

Can This AI make Hard Surface Models?....... At least for Base/Reference Model

@CGDive

16 күн бұрын

I didn't make good examples but watch some other videos. Some people have achieved good hard surface models.

Next Ai step: Auto Ai animations without animating.

@CGDive

17 күн бұрын

AKA mocap? :D

@CGDive

17 күн бұрын

actually there are text to animation solutions already.

@NomiChan1

17 күн бұрын

@@CGDive OO. I forget Mocap lol XD It's been a while since i opened Blender and my WHOLE pc so yee :) Btw i like your video 🌟

Thank you for sharing! I was wondering if something like this existed. It seems useful to a certain extent. Ignore the nay-sayers. We can use AI to help us create we just have to be careful to use our own creativity and not to rely on it for everything. I don't see it taking away creativity if it is used to speed up technical processes. Cutting edge technology is the future and we should embrace it, even if it makes some people uncomfortable. All technology evolves. If you make digital art, you have to evolve along with the software. If you don't want to change, then don't be in the business of making digital art. At first I was against AI, but it isn't going anywhere so we have to get used to it and use it for our benefit.

Where is ai rigging tool? 😡

@CGDive

16 күн бұрын

haha

@ivan-_-8577

14 күн бұрын

Hahahaha 😂

ai supporter? bye

@CGDive

16 күн бұрын

you seem too eager to put me in one of your little mental boxes. bye.

@spooderderg4077

16 күн бұрын

Jazza from Draw With Jazza supports ai too, as does Proko, Scott Eaton, Blender Guru, Aaron Blaisse, and Weta digital. Notice a pattern? People who were always renowned for teaching art to the masses because they found it fun and a good way to make money are all pro ai. The antiai crowd has some good artists sure. But that list is shrinking.

@CGDive

15 күн бұрын

@@spooderderg4077 I don't understand this "pattern" that you are seeing. How are these tut guys profiting from AI? At least I find it more difficult to grow the channel and sell my courses lately which could be due to AI. I also think that AI is more likely to make tut guys obsolete, than to replace all artists.

@spooderderg4077

15 күн бұрын

@@CGDive I said they're pro AI. Not profiting from AI. They actually care about the progression of artists and their skills which is why they are all for it. They made their channels to support more artists in their journeys.

@CGDive

15 күн бұрын

@@spooderderg4077 I see. I guess I did not understand your point initially :)

that model it gave you looks like garbage, and I have my doubts you asked Piti for permission to use his art of the character Wuffle there. this is an incredibly disappointing turn to see you taking and I regret giving you money in the past. I will be unsubscribing now. bye.

@CGDive

11 күн бұрын

Your doubt is justified. I searched for a creative commons modelling sheet and that popped up.

@CGDive

11 күн бұрын

I think you edited your reply. Please let me know if you need a refund. Happy to give it to you.