🚀 Install Star Trek Fleet Command for FREE now t2m.io/TheActionLabSTFC and enter the promo code WARPSPEED to unlock 10 Epic Shards of Kirk, enhancing your command instantly! How to easily redeem the promo code 👉 t2m.io/promo_STFC

@semuthuabeysinghe7720

5 ай бұрын

6:26 Try to find the least atmos pressure thet human can breath....try to find the limits...but please dont die...we love you soo much😢❤

@davidmudry5622

5 ай бұрын

Gravity is not a force, and only no resistance or a lack of enough resistance makes things fall...9/11?

@lonewolfnmoon

5 ай бұрын

How much force is exerted outward on the interior of a rocket in a vacum. What happens to an aluminum can inside a vacum?

@ja_

5 ай бұрын

Approximately 25% of this video is a f*cking ad! Not even broadcast television is that unbalanced.

@zbyszekkopec908

5 ай бұрын

Rockets don't work in a vacuum, so NASA only shows us CGI. The Earth is flat with Firmament.

We can all agree that there is no action lab without the good ol' vacuum chamber

@Kubalopl

5 ай бұрын

anyone still remember when he was called hydraulic press action?

@robertseptim3579

5 ай бұрын

No

@vandanaabhade8885

5 ай бұрын

Yes...

@gangstaboy9387

5 ай бұрын

I can hear that you also get hard from watching his videos!

@Doodlebug0728

5 ай бұрын

Yeah and now the vacuum chainber has reached its final form

That's a breathtakingly large vacuum chamber. Of course there's no pressure to getting in it.

@westonding8953

5 ай бұрын

Nice puns!!

@RobDucharme

5 ай бұрын

Way to take the air out of the room...

@gavins6419

5 ай бұрын

Aha. Ahaha. Hilarious. I couldn't think of anything funnier than this pun. Look at how everyone is laughing at your very well crafted and thought through joke. Everyone loved that. Totally.

@MissMyah37

5 ай бұрын

😂

@mati.benapezo

5 ай бұрын

It's so breathtaking... But it sucks

TAL: I bought a humen size vacume chamber. also TAL: I wonder what should I use it for?

Considering 34.5% of this video was an ad read, I'm surprised at how you managed to fit all that information in. Pretty cool.

@cybisz2883

5 ай бұрын

It really was much too long an ad for a video of this length.

@BaronOfDaker

5 ай бұрын

I got (125 s of ad / 403 s of content) = 31%. Pretty ridiculous, to be sure.

@ky314

5 ай бұрын

Yes, way too long of an ad

@addrakettp

5 ай бұрын

I thought the same thing. Absurd ad length for a video of this length. Very off-putting

@pallabwagle

5 ай бұрын

He could have easily made this video longer by doing everything super slow. Huge ad segment but information rich content. I think its fair enough.

New fear unlocked: accidentally getting stuck in there while it’s pulling a vacuum

@oleg4966

5 ай бұрын

I studied to be a chemist, and this vacuum chamber scares me because of what will happen if it ever implodes. Even small vacuum chambers can throw around glass shrapnel at dangerous speeds when they implode - and this monstrocity's explosion will be like a bomb going off: pretty hard to survive if you're in the same room with it. An implosion is unlikely with walls this thick (assuming it's tempered glass), but it could still happen if the walls got hit hard enough by something that is harder than glass.

@Max_Jacoby

5 ай бұрын

@@oleg4966 you are overreacting. Pressure difference never be greater than 1 atm. Too little to be a bomb.

@NickWrightDataYT

5 ай бұрын

​@@Max_Jacobyyou're getting your colloquialisms mixed up. A vacuum isn't enough compared to 1atm to *suck someone through a tiny hole.* You need a much bigger pressure differential for *that.* But just because it can't turn you into human sillyputty doesn't mean it can't slingshot glass/plastic shrapnel at you at lethal speeds if it re-pressurizes spontaneously from a total vacuum.

@lajoswinkler

5 ай бұрын

@@oleg4966 It's thick acryllic. Nothing bad will happen.

@Dvaci

5 ай бұрын

We have experience in vacuum chamber manufacturing. Acrylic walls are 2 inches thick. There is no risk of implosion.

What should you use your human size vacuum chamber for? Hmm...

@and7barton

5 ай бұрын

Invite your worst enemy over !

@batatanna

5 ай бұрын

Intrusive thoughts... Nooooo

@brackzaff

5 ай бұрын

Remake the ending of Total Recall

@Dvaci

5 ай бұрын

I hope that no one get hurts with our vacuum chamber.

@AndyTheMadDrummer1

5 ай бұрын

Seems pretty irresponsible to show a person in a vacuum chamber TBH. It would be deadly if someone turned on the vacuum pump. I'm sure not many viewers have "human-sized" vacuum chambers but still...

I can't imagine what your new toy set you back. But, with 4.54 million subscribers, I'm certain you've got some excellent vacuum demonstrations up your sleeve.

@drggayathridevi195

5 ай бұрын

Plll

@lasagnahog7695

5 ай бұрын

I'm slightly miffed that I can't find the price. The Dvaci website just has a button to request a price. The closest I found was a 20 cubic inch metal vacuum chamber for 9k USD. I would guess that's a bit lower than the bigger one made of acrylic shown in this video.

@dylanmcshane9976

5 ай бұрын

He got it free. Learn to listen. He had to demonstrate space propaganda for it.

@rafox66

5 ай бұрын

@@dylanmcshane9976 Space propaganda?😂

@jeremiahbullfrog9288

5 ай бұрын

@@dylanmcshane9976 could have just as easily left out that middle sentence, why so salty?

It's amazing to see what James is able to do with our vacuum chamber. We're thrilled to see our equipment featured on The Action Lab, and it's fascinating to watch the creative and educational experiments you're conducting. We hope you can continue to make more incredible videos with our 'giant vacuum chamber.' Looking forward to seeing what other exciting experiments you have in store for your viewers. Keep up the great work!😀

@TheInsultInvestor

5 ай бұрын

can I have one too please Ill start a channel all about it lol

@Dvaci

5 ай бұрын

Dear @@ImproveConditions Thank you for your comment and for your interest in our vacuum chambers. We appreciate your feedback, and we understand that transparency in pricing is important. Our primary focus is indeed on "Vacuum Chambers for Packaging Leak Testing," but we also cater to various other applications within the industrial sector. Regarding pricing, we offer a range of vacuum chambers to suit different needs, and our prices typically start at $5,000 USD for our smaller models. However, the final cost may vary depending on the specific features and customization required for your unique application. We believe in providing tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our customers, which is why we encourage you to reach out to us for a personalized quote that takes into account your specific requirements. Our team will be more than happy to assist you and ensure that you receive the most accurate and competitive pricing for your project. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any further questions or if you'd like to discuss your specific needs in more detail. We're here to help and provide you with the best solution possible.

@papalegba6796

5 ай бұрын

You're thrilled to see your equipment used for fraud? Ok 😂

@stuartgray5877

5 ай бұрын

@@papalegba6796 There's that little imbecile! Bless your little heart! Still denying Newtons Laws I see.

@CNCmachiningisfun

5 ай бұрын

@@papalegba6796 Space travel deniers are thicker than pig poop!

Glad you enjoyed the flash paper James! I never envisioned it would be perfect for rockets!

@dylanmcshane9976

5 ай бұрын

combustion isnt the issue in a vacuum. propulsion is. Theres nothing to push on in a vacuum.

@someaccount3438

5 ай бұрын

Someone never learned what conservation of momentum is.

@Owen_loves_Butters

5 ай бұрын

⁠@@dylanmcshane9976It generates its own gasses that it "pushes" off of. Maybe try learning basic physics.

@dylanmcshane9976

5 ай бұрын

Whats in a perfect vacuum to push off of child? Nothing. Close your mindless lips.@@Owen_loves_Butters

@dylanmcshane9976

5 ай бұрын

Rockets work because it has atmosphere to push off of. Its just magic in space though. Humanities population seems to be all children. Brainwashed and without BASIC logic.@@someaccount3438

Maybe you can somehow test the fact that pure metal alloys can be cut and then fused back again in (an inert) space. Oxidation under normal sircumstances due to oxygen in the atmosphere, prevent metals from fusing back again. Apparently in space this works different. Just be pressing and holding the two metal parts against each other, causes them to weld after some time, in absence of oxygen.

@westonding8953

5 ай бұрын

He has done cold metal welding before

Cool video but I think you should be more selective with ads: that game is made with the sole purpose of squeezing money out of people who have no self control and are addicted to gambling. It's not fun to play, it's purely a microtransaction platform.

@ab-hx8qe

12 күн бұрын

I agree with your point but tbh that description fits like 90% of games these days.

I am shocked by the amount and quality of content you create! I didn't live in the time or place to have Bill Nye or any other scientist like him available on TV, but having access to your videos explains a lot why they were so popular! Fascinating! Thank you so much for sharing all of this!

@outlawedTV88

5 ай бұрын

Bill Nye? Ahahah lucky for you that you didn't means your brain is not that much damaged :)) BTW he's no scientist. He was a car dealer & an actor as well

@kelvyquayo

5 ай бұрын

Shocked? He has 4 Million subscribers. This is a CAREER.

I would like to see what a Tesla coil would look like if you placed it in a vacuum chamber with the air replaced with a different gas like neon. Would the sparks ⚡️ be reddish rather than the normal violet colored ones that we get with the nitrogen rich air?

@uh-nuh

5 ай бұрын

good idea, but electronics might overheat or cant resist against the vacuum. He can take care of the cooling by covering a large piece of metal with thin nylon(to prevent possible shorts) and using some cheap thermal paste. (A chunk of metal should be able to handle and store some heat) But I'm not sure about the circuit board. For example, the capacitors on the circuit were not made for low pressure, I am sure they would expand like a balloons Maybe he can make a small pressure-resistant container and put the Tesla coil inside it, then drill separate holes for only the tip of the Tesla coil and the power cables and plug/seal them with silicone, or if he manages to make a pressure-resistant container, he can simply put the batteries directly inside. I'm not sure how he can turn it on and off, maybe Spend more money and get a remote control

@superslimanoniem4712

5 ай бұрын

​@@uh-nuhfor control could just use a reed switch and a relay...

Next video: How long a random viewer could survive in outer space conditions?

@williamyamm8803

5 ай бұрын

🤣🤣🤣

@rdizzy1

5 ай бұрын

I volunteer to have my body in there with my head sticking outside of the chamber and sealed around my neck, if that is possible without it choking me out.

@LcdDrmr

5 ай бұрын

@@rdizzy1 Wouldn't you have trouble pushing air back out of your lungs against the 14psi? Maybe you'd even over-inflate?

@batatanna

5 ай бұрын

​@@rdizzy1that's even worse than being fully inside.

@rdizzy1

5 ай бұрын

@@LcdDrmr Can hold my breath for a minute or 2. Would also have to do the same inside of the chamber, but less worrying with your head already out, can instantly start breathing once they release the valve.

Have you ever tried recording sound while sucking out the air out of the chamber? Curious how the sound changes based on the amount of pressure around the microphone (and the air or lack of).

@helm311

5 ай бұрын

This indeed would be cool to witness in his vacuum chamber

@monty3322

4 ай бұрын

That would be interesting!

I know it's been done so many times before, but seeing something light drop as fast as something heavy is always amazing to see.

Your experiments are always way more interesting than i expect.

You could put a flat earther in there and suck out all the air ?

@noahwilliams8996

9 күн бұрын

Then the police would take it away. :(

Would be interesting to see how various phase transitions of states of matter happen at different pressures

@lesliespeaker668

5 ай бұрын

Oh, nice one. Have all kinds of different fluids all lined up next to each other and we can see them start boiling at different pressures.

@col0342

5 ай бұрын

Ionic liquid (or any liquid with very low vapor pressure) siphon working in vacuum .

Please get into it and see how long you can last in a vacuum. Wait, that's my inside voice. Don't do that. But still, I'd love to see it (just for science's sake!)

@MartinHabovstiak

5 ай бұрын

There was an accident where someone got stuck in a vacuum chamber. He survived.

@frankbauerful

5 ай бұрын

This is absolutely what I would do. I want to know what it FEELS LIKE to be in a vacuum chamber. As for the danger, I think it's less dangerous than diving. The maximum force your body could experience is from 1 atmosphere of pressure, assuming you can hold in your breath. Compare that to diving where you experience multiple atmospheres of pressure.

@Matteo9700

5 ай бұрын

@@frankbauerfulit’s a lot worse than diving.

@dominikmilien

5 ай бұрын

@@frankbauerful Apart from the fact that your bodily fluids don't boil while diving.

@LcdDrmr

5 ай бұрын

@@frankbauerful I'm afraid you'd have damage done to your body before you could feel it. And probably just the time it takes to lower or raise the pressure precludes a human doing this safely.

If you watch any of the live video of the Falcon9 and Falcon Heavy launch and Booster return all the way to KSC, then you have seen definitive proof of "Rocket Propulsion IN a vacuum". The YT member "Astronomy Live" has taken amazing video of these launches and never loses sight of the side boosters. I can explain how these videos are proof of rocket propulsion in a vacuum, (if they are willing to actually evaluate the evidence)

@stuartgray5877

5 ай бұрын

The best of his work can be found by searching YT for "Stabilized Footage of Falcon Heavy from Launch To Landing! USSF-67"

@papalegba6796

3 ай бұрын

Why are you asking people to watch videos made by a criminal?

@rocketman484

15 күн бұрын

@@papalegba6796 What makes you say that Astronomy Live is a criminal? You are a criminal as you engage in slander and defamation every day. Oh and you LIE every single day.

This is amazing, can’t wait to see all the different experiments you can do with this

@Dvaci

5 ай бұрын

We can’t wait to see the next experiment.

Get the slowmo guys on this, 100% people will believe the thrust has no effect until the ejected gas hits the wall and builds onto itself. Super slow mo will show the truth.

Great video as usual. Could you consider testing photographic film stability in a vacuum at some point in the future?

@davidbowerman6433

4 ай бұрын

it would actually be more stable. they used to vacuum pack rolls to add shelf life in the 70's

Great content!! Maybe you could demonstrate Galileo's experiment showing that gravity causes different masses to fall with the same acceleration. Maybe you could use a bird feather, a ball bearing, regular household items, a plastic bag, etc. Thanks.

@MaGaO

5 ай бұрын

He did so in an earlier video (feather and a steel ball) but yes, this will allow for larger objects.

I think it might be cool to try a farnsworth fusor experiment to perform fusion. Fusors tend to be difficult to see because of the bulky vacuum chamber surrounding it. but if you have a large chamber you could show more clearly all of the parts and since the fusor creates a glow you may be able to visualize the operation more clearly. I'm not sure what the vacuum requirements are though. Also requires being able to inject small amounts of deuterium fuel.

@lesliespeaker668

5 ай бұрын

This. And do some other plasma experiments also, adding small amounts of different gases, making big objects glow and such.

@RMX7777

5 ай бұрын

A demonstration at the voltages and pressures needed for fusion would produce a large number of X-rays. The steel walls of typical fusors attenuate the radiation, keeping the operator safe. A radiation shield would need to be constructed if he would build a working fusor in this chamber. That aside, there is likely too much off-gassing from the plastic of this chamber. The pressure he reached here was 0.02 atmospheres, for fusion you would need around 0.00001 atmospheres.

@NaveedAhmedpuri

5 ай бұрын

@@lesliespeaker668 broken tube light in that

Normal peoples: oh it’s so cool!! Flat earthers: oh no god please no!!

I think a cool idea would be to mount the rocket on a track or in a way that it wouldn’t run into anything and see how fast and how long you could get it to going. Very nice video by the way!

5:26 omg that laminar jet looks amazing!

You could maybe put non vaccuum smaller box inside it the big new vacuum box so you could remote open the smaller box and super rapidly drop the pressure. Maybee see if this will insta boil water or explode an apple or something more interesting :)

You should make a contraption that does nothing but mechanically throw mass out the back to produce thrust, as in reality that is all that is needed (like maybe a tiny compressed spring powered cannon type device). If you were floating around in space, you could produce thrust by taking off one of your shoes and throwing it in one direction, you would then have some thrust in the opposite direction. I think a lot of people don't realize that gas has mass.

@LcdDrmr

5 ай бұрын

No one would throw a shoe like that, they'd chicken out.

@fu3g

5 ай бұрын

Watching too many movies mate..

@rdizzy1

5 ай бұрын

@@fu3g Has nothing to do with movies, it is basic science, throw mass one way=movement in the opposite direction. Just gave a hypothetical example. The same would be true if you were in a ship in space and you threw cargo out the back, the spaceship would move a small amount in the opposite direction.

@stuartgray5877

5 ай бұрын

@@fu3g - "Watching too many movies mate.." YET - I BET you think that the "vacuum of space" is like a giant vacuum cleaner - Right?

Connect your giant vacuum chamber to a tiny vacuum chamber with a fast valve to show rapid decompression in the tiny vacuum chamber.

"Let's see if we can do it without destroying the rocket this time." - Elon Musk

Why don't you put a smaller vacuum chamber inside the big vacuum chamber to create a super vacuum?

@uh-nuh

5 ай бұрын

Yeah, he should put the vacuum motor inside the big vacuum chamber. Tho if its not simple plug-in run, the circuit might get some damage from the vacuum. But if its just a simple motor connected to wall, it should be possible

When I heard what the first planned experiment with new vacuum was I was like, eh. However, seeing it action was extremely cool! Especially the larger attempt with the visible propulsive stream. Very nice.

It's wierd, I thought the smoke in the vaccume, at least in the initial stage, will have a curvy trajectory due to the gravity and airless environment. But turns out, though without turbulance, the smoke jet still traveled a quite straight line, and dispersed into all directions after hitting the wall like it's in the air.

It would be cool to see what happens to a plant in the vacuum and how long it would survive for

@TheExplosiveGuy

5 ай бұрын

Not very long, it would dessicate the plant in short order, maybe an hour or so, though of course it would take longer for a large plant like a tree. It would definitely be an interesting experiment though, I should try it myself, though my vacuum chamber is only a 10" x 6" cylinder so it would have to be a small plant, like a succulent or something along those lines...

@Dvaci

5 ай бұрын

I don’t think plants can survive in high vacuum.

@stuartgray5877

5 ай бұрын

@@Dvaci But water bears CAN. If they are in their suspended animation state.

He gets some of the most incompatible sponsors with his channel

@aerospike808

5 ай бұрын

Maybe Dvaci vacuum chambers would be a good fit..

I would like to see this guy test the Biefield-Brown Effect in a vacuum chamber. However instead of using only DC for both electrodes; high voltage high frequency AC would also be used only for the negative collector electrode and high voltage DC would be used only for the positive electrode. Another experiment I would like to see this guy perform is Edgar Fouche's TR3B magnetic field disruptor (but on a much smaller scale device).

Excellent video! I truly love channels like yours! Seeing this concept in such a simple, yet highly effective way, makes it so much more interesting and amazing!

That vacuum chamber is awesome, James!! I love it! 🤩

@Dvaci

5 ай бұрын

I'm glade to see that you love our "giant vacuum chamber"

SUGGESTION - I know this might seem crazy, but try putting a regular fan in there and see if it moves. (I know there's no air, but try to prove there isn't 'something' in a vacuum.) I do like your videos!!

@JustWasted3HoursHere

5 ай бұрын

Yes! And hang a feather in front of the fan so that at full vacuum and the fan running at maximum speed, the feather doesn't move.

@barneylaurance1865

5 ай бұрын

@@JustWasted3HoursHere I think the feather probably still would move either from electrostatic forces or from the movement of the small amount of air still in the chamber.

@The14Some1

5 ай бұрын

@@barneylaurance1865 well that's exactly what makes it potentially interesting to test.

@MaGaO

5 ай бұрын

​@@barneylaurance1865 The first part can be solved with adequate grounding, the second one with good enough vacuum. Also he ran tests with drones inside the vacuum chamber before.

@jdriver1419

5 ай бұрын

​@@JustWasted3HoursHerecodys lab did it on his channel quite a few years ago. the lightweight downy type feather would NOT move at ALL once the air was gone. And in this video, I think the syringe moved only because it pushed off the wall of the box, because there is no air to push . I don't think it would move in a vaccume type of outer space. Also Cody's Lab fan experiment showed me that helicopter drones wouldnt fly on mars. but action lab has this donated vaccume cube, plus all kinds of sponsers now, wearing the NASA shirt and sponsered by star trek game........ so I'm expecting to see more bias than usual.

- Find a a way to make a plant survive Mars atmosphere - The simplest possible mini greenhouse that could survive Mars atmosphere with solar power - Can a low power laptop/raspberry survive the vacuum of space? - A mini regolith water extractor that operates in vacuum (like on the moon)

Here's a weird question: if you mount the rocket to the floor of the chamber without the lid on, it should produce a thrust against the table, which is connected to the vacuum chamber. Place a scale under the vacuum chamber... the rocket should cause a positive change to the scale equal the thrust of the rocket. Then, place the lid of the vacuum chamber on but don't evacuate the air and repeat the experiment. Does the scale measure a change? Then, evacuate the vacuum chamber and repeat the experiment. Does the creation of a closed vacuum system allow the rocket to impart its thrust onto the scale?

Back when Robert Goddard published his first papers on rockets, the New York Times wrote an extremely dismissive editorial, claiming rockets would never work in a vacuum. They printed a retraction on July 20, 1969 when Apollo 11 landed on the moon.

@papalegba6796

5 ай бұрын

Yeah that was a dark day for science. NASA is scientology but funded by the government 😂

@zounds010

5 ай бұрын

@@papalegba6796 Nope, just actual science.

@papalegba6796

5 ай бұрын

@@zounds010 ok L Ron Hubbard... Real good NASA science, like Don Pettit says 😂

@CNCmachiningisfun

5 ай бұрын

@@papalegba6796 Space travel deniers are thicker than pig poop!

cant wait to see what kinda things will action lab do with such a vaccume chamber 💀💀

@Dvaci

5 ай бұрын

I hope you enjoy our vacuum chamber 🎉

@Boeman201rx

5 ай бұрын

​@@Dvacisure will! 😄

I thought you were going to slightly depressurize the chamber while you were in it. Glad you haven't lost it to that degree yet 😆

Something to try: Place your old vacuum chamber into the new big one and activate the big one first, and when it reaches almost vacuum activate the old one and see if it can create additional vacuum inside of it. Maybe it won't be able to create additional vacuum since almost no air to pump, hence there will be no pressure difference between outside and inside of it to press on the cover from the outside and make a tight seal.

@hemppants808

5 ай бұрын

hell yeah bro, critical thinking is the shit

As someone involved in testing rockets for spacecraft, I love these demonstration videos, showcasing fundamental proof of concept. While some might argue that rockets cannot operate in a true vacuum akin to the high vacuum levels of deep space, this video still holds educational value despite the vast differences between deep space vacuum levels and a off the shelf vacuum pump.

@papalegba6796

5 ай бұрын

You don't test rockets 😂

@mrarby9780

5 ай бұрын

@@papalegba6796 how are you going to tell me what I do for a living lol...

@papalegba6796

5 ай бұрын

@@mrarby9780 "everything on the internet is real" said nobody, ever 😂

@mrarby9780

5 ай бұрын

@@papalegba6796 doesn't mean everything on the internet is fake

@CNCmachiningisfun

5 ай бұрын

@@papalegba6796 Space travel deniers are thicker than pig poop!

Use the big vacuum chamber to pull the lid off of your small vacuum chamber.

Congrats on the new vacuum chamber! Never thought I would be congratulating anyone a vacuum chamber 😄

A recent starship launch showed us how fast gas/fuel spreads in a near-vacuum space. The moment it exploded, the explosion covered the entire viewfinder of the camera(which is a huge area I guess).

I think you should reduce the pressure to Mars ground level, and colab /w Daniel at Rc Test Flight and fly a modified drone inside the chamber! Or maybe the Think Flight channel? JPL in Pasadena is probably too busy to help 😅

@lajoswinkler

5 ай бұрын

"Collaborate with", not "colab /w". Don't destroy your language.

@jdriver1419

5 ай бұрын

check out Cody's Lab from a few years ago with afeather and fan and Mars type atmosphere.

Here’s an idea! Shine a 30,000 lumen flashlight on the flash paper!

@drenz1523

5 ай бұрын

that's gonna really burn!

You should make a pressurized capsule to put inside (basically a space station)

I must confess I expected you to check the lowest pressure where you would feel good enough. It was silly of me to expect that 🤣

Hi! Put inside soda bottles, champagne bottles, something with high pressure inside. Also, balloons! Keep up the great work, cheers from Italy!!😊

@nicholas-dv1mg

5 ай бұрын

pretty sure he already did those, but I guess it doesn't hurt for them to have more space.

@Giuseppe_De_Bellis

5 ай бұрын

@@nicholas-dv1mg yes! That's what i meant!☺️ Or many of them💪🏻

The slow motion shows that the syringe remained in place until the gas collided with the glass... In space there is no glass wall.

@h.dejong2531

5 ай бұрын

nope. The slow motion shows that the syringe remained in place for a while after the gas collided with the glass, demonstrating that hitting the glass is not what caused the rocket to move. In space, we have 10,000 successful satellite launches demonstrating that rockets can operate in the vacuum of space.

I have always wondered what effect a vacuum would have on 3D printed objects. To be more specific, fdm printing in a vacuum. It would be interesting to see what it would do to the density of the final print. Would it close the tiny voids where infill and shells meet. What would it do to prints at various infill percentages? This has been on my mind for some time, but testing it is out of my reach.

You should test if sound is heard outside the vacuumchamber and if it cant then how much of a vacuum is needed to get silence, and if you can hear it if it touches the sides, i dont know if it can be done without the item "floating" in the middle somehow, cause i think the noise might be heard if its held up from the bottom or dangeling from the ceiling.

Have you ever tried to let a plant do fotosynthesis in martian atmospheric composition conditions (at surface level) ? Ofcourse not the freezing temperature conditions! Just the 98% carbondioxide at martian air pressure. Maybe try to burn a candle with the oxygen produced by the plant. For a nice visual effect!

@lajoswinkler

5 ай бұрын

The plant would die. Pressure on Mars is effectively a vacuum. No photosynthesis. Plant desiccates as turgor drops and that's the end of it.

@col0342

5 ай бұрын

Photosynthesis requires water (in addition to CO2 and light). Not much of it remains inside the cells at such low pressures.

A 2 minute ad in 6.5 minute video. Good Lord.

@papalegba6796

5 ай бұрын

A video of a fraudulent experiment too. The guy is shameless but space nerds are easily fooled😂

@CNCmachiningisfun

5 ай бұрын

@@papalegba6796 Space travel deniers are thicker than pig poop!

Very cool! You could expand on that laminar flow part. Maybe fix the rocket on one side and watch the smoke stream be steady until it hits the wall.

I’ve been waiting for this, well done 👍

Try boiling water inside the chamber using fast-burning paper.

@hugoz6950

5 ай бұрын

You won't need burning paper to make it boiling as vacuum would be enough for that

You can now test how long human can survive without air :)

@xoiyoub

5 ай бұрын

I'd be more gruesome than you might think

That was very cool. The little rocket definitely went faster than I expected.

I remember this debate on your channel from years ago. Glad it’s solved now.

Thanks, Action Lab. I've described how rockets work to Flat Earthers (who claim rockets can only work by "pushing against air in the atmosphere".) I described a very similar experiment to this in a vacuum chamber. They, of course, denied it was possible. Reality is a major stumbling block to them. If I ever run into one again, I'll refer them back to this video.

@thudthud5423

5 ай бұрын

@@Amplified_Truth 16 paragraphs of pure misconception, misunderstanding and misapplication of Newtonian physics. And then we see the video. You can lead a Flat Earther to the truth but you can't make him think.

@jdriver1419

5 ай бұрын

​@@Amplified_TruthTHANK YOU. Well said. Hopefully the "scientific community" will leave your comment up and allow opposing conversation. Which is rare these days. My 12 yr old son watched this video last night. Immediately when action lab showed the slow mo of the jet stream hit the side of the box and finally move my son said, "LOOK! IT PUSHED OFF THE SIDE OF THE BOX". Then today we brought up the subject and I told him people in the comment section get mad if ypu say that. And I told him that achilds mind that isn't corrupted with programming can see things better than adults that are programmed what to think. He said, yeah, it's like a story we read in school about the emporers new clothes, which really werent there and the only one that said it was a child.

@jdriver1419

5 ай бұрын

oh, and i should probably clarify, I'm not a flat earther, or at least not yet(I still have to do a laser test across 50 miles of water, to see 4 myself). . Yet I highly doubt rockets can propell themselves in the vacume of the so called outer space.

@thudthud5423

5 ай бұрын

@@jdriver1419 You fail to grasp simple things like a Flat Earther...such as the blatant content of this video.

@jdriver1419

5 ай бұрын

@@thudthud5423 okay, I must have an extremely low IQ. 🤪

1/3 of the video is an ad lol

@papalegba6796

3 ай бұрын

...And the rest is fraud. This guy should be in jail 😂

I do not know if you've done this with your small chamber but what about testing the law of gravitation, they used a hammer and a feather on the moon if I remember correctly, you could do something similar. You'd just need to build a remote controlled contraption to do the dropping.

@BariumCobaltNitrog3n

5 ай бұрын

The Law of Gravitation you say. Gravity gravitying. A magnet would work but the gravity of the situation would be the same. What's missing in a vacuum?

@FrankyPi

5 ай бұрын

@@BariumCobaltNitrog3n Air drag

Huh, I never thought about the fact that the vacuum of space setting up a huge pressure difference makes rocket propulsion more efficient. Plus you're not trying to push through more atmosphere. This is why I stick around for these videos despite the simple seeming questions asked. Like, 'do rockets fly in space?' is such a simple question to answer through observing rockets flying through space but, as always, the 'why' is where the interesting stuff happens.

Have you ever tried to put a mouse (dead) or an earthworm into a vacuum chamber to see how a body would act in space

fe'ers with the "nah ahh" in 3.... 2..... 1....

thanks a lot for the practical example and for these valuable explanations. your content is amazing both in quality and quantity, keep up the good work.

@h.dejong2531

5 ай бұрын

He didn't use a dollar: he used flashpaper printed with 1 dollar graphics.

@whynot-vq2ly

5 ай бұрын

@@h.dejong2531 you're right, sorry for my misunderstanding, i'll edit the comment. thanks

He finally did it! This must be the greatest the action lab has ever done!

Can u do a human test, keep neck out of vaccum, and check how no air feels like on body.

@M_Alexander

5 ай бұрын

Ok but maybe start that with like, a hand

@M_Alexander

5 ай бұрын

And there's a small chance you can't exhale when your body is in vacuum

@aleccarlson492

5 ай бұрын

@@M_Alexandermore like it would be hard not to exhale… gas would be forced out of your body

@M_Alexander

5 ай бұрын

@@aleccarlson492 that's if your body is in high pressure, like being underwater. If the pressure at your head is higher than the pressure around your torso, you'd be fighting the pressure to exhale

@aleccarlson492

5 ай бұрын

@@M_Alexander nah bro. High pressure arrow pointing in. Low pressure arrow pointing out. Vaccum chambers are created by sucking air out…

Why don't u wear an oxygen mask in the chamber😂

@thomasdalton1508

5 ай бұрын

I know you are joking, but in case anyone isn't aware, an oxygen mask doesn't work in a vacuum. Without pressure outside your chest to balance the pressure inside your chest, you can't breathe. There would be no way to exhale against the pressure from the mask. Even if you took the mask off to exhale, I don't think it would really work.

@irgendwer3610

5 ай бұрын

it would dilate his blood vessels and it would make him go unconscious even with the oxygen

Rig a device to extract gases from random objects (rocks, fruit etc). Put like a flat balloon with a small pipe to a bag wrapped/taped around a thing into the chamber. The gas should move into the balloon and if you can close it somehow you could smell it or set it on fire or whatever. No idea if this is even viable but doesn't rotting fruit have ethylene?

i was not ready for how strong it was! A childlike fascination!

For a next idea I'd say maybe try a ballistic gelatin dummy or something. You know, since it's human sized

@koxhecker

5 ай бұрын

more intresting would be if he would use a dead pig or something but he would get so much backfire from all vegetarians and Karens that he used an animal for tests

Instead of the rocket/syringe, can you please demonstrate that launching a small mass (ball bearing?) still causes force/thrust in the opposite direction when in a vacuum chamber? That would prove it is not pushing off the chamber walls, as some people seem to believe.

@engineeringtheweirdguy2103

4 ай бұрын

Like a ball and spring. Been done. They claim it’s different because it’s “not a gas”

@papalegba6796

4 ай бұрын

@@engineeringtheweirdguy2103 it obviously is different, chatbot. Claiming solids & gases behave the same is insane 😂

@engineeringtheweirdguy2103

4 ай бұрын

@@papalegba6796 obviously you havn’t heard of the kinematic theory of gasses which correctly describes how gasses operate and is the source of many of the gas law equations we have today, is responsible for things like Dyson cyclonic vacuumes, jet engines, gliders, refrigeration, snow blowers, air-conditioning, etc etc etc and has been proven over and over and over again. In which the theory states the particles obey the laws of Newtonian physics, and are individual particles with mass, motion and thus momentum. Just like a ball.

@engineeringtheweirdguy2103

4 ай бұрын

@@papalegba6796 anything else you feel like being wrong about today chatbot?

@papalegba6796

3 ай бұрын

@@engineeringtheweirdguy2103 Holy sh!t you are badly programmed 😂

Never thought setting fire in a vacuum with a laser would be so super handy! 🔥

With a chamber that big you can put the smaller chamber inside it and do some rapid decompression tests. What would actually happen if you were blown out an airlock into space? Will water vaporize quickly, or just begin boiling? What will happen to eyes, meat, etc?

Action and reaction requires only two objects, one acting on the other. The engine accelerates the burnt gases, and they exert a reaction on the engine. There is no need for a third object or entity for this to work. No atmosphere to be "pushed against". It is the gases themselves that are being pushed, and it is the gasses themselves that cause the reaction on the engine and propels it on the other direction. Yes, rockets do work in a vacuum.

@papalegba6796

4 ай бұрын

A rocket is one object, loony tunes 😂

@coriscotupi

4 ай бұрын

@@papalegba6796 *"A rocket is one object"* The ejected gas is the other object, child. Gas (object ONE) is ejected in one direction, the rocket (object TWO) is accelerated in the opposite direction. Need a drawing?

@papalegba6796

4 ай бұрын

@@coriscotupi the exhaust is part of the rocket, as it moves with it at all times, loony tunes. Same as the propeller on a plane or the wings on a bird. They all push on the atmosphere through which they move, as there is nothing else to push on.

@coriscotupi

4 ай бұрын

@@papalegba6796 Child, the exhaust doesn't push on anything. The rocket pushes the exhaust out, and the rocket is accelerated in te opposite direction. Action and reaction works by accelerating MASS. The exhaust gas is this mass. No relation whatsoever with the atmosphere. You need to get some schooling. I won't be surprised if you assert next that the Earth is flat, that airplanes produce "chemtrails", that Man never went to the Moon and vaccines are bad for the health. LOL

@frantaspacek9583

4 ай бұрын

​@@papalegba6796 "exhaust moves with the rocket" hilarious

Another great video mate. I have a flat earther that I just love to debunk. He has used this video to claim that rockets cant work in space. He I claiming that the syringe didn't move until the stream contacted the far wall, as they know rockets need something to push off of. Now, do you mind if I also use your video to point out his massive cherry picking lying fail? I will fully reference you of course which is exactly what he does not do. Thanks for having watermarks in your videos. keep up the good work.

@papalegba6796

5 ай бұрын

Read what you wrote. You sound nuts 😂

@whereswa11y

5 ай бұрын

@@papalegba6796 what who wrote? You really need to be clearer in your communications.

@CNCmachiningisfun

5 ай бұрын

@@papalegba6796 Space travel deniers are thicker than pig poop!

@papalegba6796

3 ай бұрын

@@whereswa11y You sound even more nuts now 😂

@whereswa11y

3 ай бұрын

@@papalegba6796 I didnt expect that you would understand...

You should design a rocket test stand to fit inside the chamber and test one or two at a time on a circular path. That'd be neat

Can you test the force produced from identical rockets in a vacuum and outside it? Does the air pressure have any identifiable effect on the performance? This is with the paper as a fuel source.

A full third of this video is an ad. Do your ads. But do better.

@papalegba6796

3 ай бұрын

The rest is fraud. This channel should be banned.

Could you try performing the communicating vessels experiment inside the vacuum chamber as what keeps them aligned is the atmospheric pressure so this experiment would prove it and you could try involving other phenomena and properties related to that experiment

You can use it to show that water will boil at normal room temperature if the pressure is low enough.

I can help anyone understand how rockets work, but only if they answer some questions. I find no amount of trying to force someone to understand will help them. They must see the answer, themselves. If they answer a few questions, they will figure out how it works. Let's think about a rocket engine running right here on earth in an atmosphere before thinking about "in a vacuum". So, imagine a single Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) igniting right here at sea level. These consume about 500 kilograms of liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen per second and expel the "exhaust gas" at about Mach Eight. 1 - Does the "exhaust gas" have any mass? 2 - Did the rocket engine "accelerate" this exhaust gas? 3 - Can mass be accelerated by anything other than a "Force"? Answer these three questions and I will get to the ones that are relevant to "propulsion in a vacuum". But they must demonstrate that they understand these basic physics terms.

@stuartgray5877

5 ай бұрын

The "Physics Deniers" will refuse to answer basic physics questions. They ONLY reject anything Engineers and Scientists say. They cannot even support their denial except to deny. Watch when troll-master papalegba shows up and denies everything.

@stuartgray5877

5 ай бұрын

Would anyone care to answer the question: If a Space Shuttle Main Engine "Burns" (Combusts) 500 kilograms of liquid oxygen and liquid Hydrogen *per second* : What IS the "Exhaust gas" and what is the mass of this exhaust gas *per second* ? (now the educated people would first say "Well, Assuming Stoichiometric ratio of H to O the exhaust gas would be pure ......") ??

@CNCmachiningisfun

5 ай бұрын

@@stuartgray5877 I look forward to seeing the discussion that may soon take place between you, and the many science deniers who are currently fouling the comments under this video :) .

@stuartgray5877

5 ай бұрын

@@CNCmachiningisfun Well as you can SEE the physics denying morons would rather hurl their ridiculous ideas at sounding boards just to hear people say "Oh yeah, definitely" than have an actual Conversation with someone that launches things to space as their job of the last 30 years.

@CNCmachiningisfun

5 ай бұрын

@@stuartgray5877 Indeed. They seem to be proud of their profound ignorance, and overall contempt for reality. I would pity them, but that would mean that I would have to stop laughing at them. Your line of work sounds fascinating, and I imagine that you absolutely love it. Oh, how I envy, in a nice way, those to enjoy their work :) .

I understand the necessity for sponsorship but a 2 min ad within a 6 min video is a little much.

@Darkhound11

Ай бұрын

You know they have freaking lasers now with from aircraft’s… unreal. We are so close to being that bad guys from battle Lost Angelos!!

So when less things interact it moves faster until a denser area. Maybe light does this and magnetic fields are like pinching them to move and that’s why quantum mechanics is instant but not. The influences of reality apply to it differently because of size and comp so certain things don’t influence while others may have extreme influences.

Demonstrate solid nitrogen. Fill foam coffee cup with liquid nitrogen & put in center of chamber. Close & evacuate. If your pump is fast enough, the nitrogen will first boil fast, then cool to the triple point. Then a cylindrical lacy "ice" structure will slowly grow up out of the cup until it hits the top of the chamber!

LOL at the space travel deniers here :) .

@papalegba6796

4 ай бұрын

Tell me again now 14psi is a vacuum, chatbot 😂

@stuartgray5877

3 ай бұрын

@@papalegba6796 Tell us ALL how rockets can accelerate mass into the vacuum without applying a force to that mass. Papalegba thinks "Magic" Exists.

@papalegba6796

3 ай бұрын

@@stuartgray5877 reported for spam, chatbot 😂

@CNCmachiningisfun

3 ай бұрын

@@papalegba6796 GROW UP!

@frantaspacek9583

3 ай бұрын

​@@papalegba6796 Dictionary definition of vacuum: a) a space absolutely devoid of matter b) a space partially exhausted by artificial means (such as an air pump) c) a degree of rarefaction below atmospheric pressure What is rarefaction you ask? This should explain it to you: "A natural example of rarefaction occurs in the layers of Earth's atmosphere. Because the atmosphere has mass, most atmospheric matter is nearer to the Earth due to the Earth's gravitation. Therefore, air at higher layers of the atmosphere is less dense, or rarefied, relative to air at lower layers."

Science can be wrong sometimes, even with "vacuum" in this chamber there is still air and other medium left that can be used as mass for the rocket to travel through. In a perfect vacuum such as in space, these mediums do not exist. And the rocket is way too big for this chamber, it used the "wall" of the chamber to gain its momentum. The question remains, can a rocket gain momentum in a perfect massless medium completely independently without a reference point to launch from?

@GrandConnoisseur

5 ай бұрын

@@Amplified_Truth Thank you!

@frantaspacek9583

5 ай бұрын

Yes, a rocket can gain momentum without a reference point to launch from. The proof is extremely simple, let's say you're in space and you hold some object. What will happen when you throw it?

@GrandConnoisseur

5 ай бұрын

@@frantaspacek9583 Nothing! Why do you think airplanes stall at high altitudes? It doesn't matter how powerful the engines are, planes can't fly or function without a dense enough medium to travel through, just like rockets also need a medium to travel through. Without any medium to travel trough or propel from (gain momentum from) you will go nowhere.

@frantaspacek9583

5 ай бұрын

@@GrandConnoisseur wait, nothing? so you say the object will just stay glued to your hand? and yes, planes do need air to fly. that's why we don't use planes to go to space.

@GrandConnoisseur

5 ай бұрын

@@frantaspacek9583 So you think that if you reduce the wings and use a more powerful rocket engine with its own oxidizer on an airplane, it can suddenly fly in space? 😆Because that is the only differences between a rocket and an airplane...

What about a small lithium ion battery fire. You hear EV fires are impossible to put out., so would be good to see if this really is true.

Congratulations. This was the perfect example of its not the speed that kills you, its the instant stopping.