Hahaha "Sponsorrrrrrr" - keep going with this quality and they will come... I would love to repeat your tests on my Intel 8700K if I could get your source files

@hmarci

5 жыл бұрын

You can see what I did at 6:51 - add the two videos, edit it to 5:00 length, add a LUT and enjoy. Looking forward to your results, please share when you're done! Here are the video files: mega.nz/#F!nyhmDaAR!9KXfaAfXQRr-DiuHcra_pA

@howtosandreviews5316

5 жыл бұрын

@@hmarci Well received thank you. If you have your LUT's saved please share those for consistency. I have the Samsung 980 Pro which I think is much the same as your 981 so we are good there. I will borrow your equivalent Radeon from a friend. It is your 8/16 cores at 3.0/3.7 GHz vs my 6/12 cores at 3.7/4.7 GHz This is going to be interesting!

@hmarci

5 жыл бұрын

@@howtosandreviews5316 Alright, I put it in the folder as well, although I don't think the type of LUT matters. Thanks for doing this, it sure will be interesting!

@howtosandreviews5316

5 жыл бұрын

​@@hmarci Testing has started in earnest. I have expanded your tests to include Vegas 15 and will test 17 at the end of the week when it comes out on the 5th. Also threw Corel Video Studio into the mix. AND also each using IntelQSV, AMD RX580, nVidia GTX 1070 and the new 5700XT from AMD where possible. Sneak-peak spoiler alert, my Intel 8700K with the nearly identical RX580/8GB rendered your files with the LUT in 03:53 in Vegas 16 - against your 04:46 time! Can you tell me what settings you picked in the MainConcept test for Vegas, So I can get a CPU-CPU comparison of that.? The only thing I cannot test accurately is Resolve as the freebee version does not include and HW acceleration it seems...

@hmarci

5 жыл бұрын

@@howtosandreviews5316 Wow, sounds exciting! But are you talking about your QSV results? That might be a difference between the special HW accelerator chip, and not the CPU power. If I'm not mistaken, you can also choose AMD VCE with your Radeon cards, since that chip is in the GPU and not the CPU. So you can also do a different level of comparisons between the two acceleration methods! :D So geeky, but I love it. For MainConcept, I believe I chose the Internet 4K 2160p 25 fps preset, if I remember correctly.

Very high detailed for such a small youtuber. Flawless, a vid like this couldn't be done any better.

This is one of the most fun review videos out there. Thank you

Engaging speech, interesting topic. Rarely people put this much time and effort in one video, great job!

Thank you for this! I will watch for more reviews!

what a great video, glad someone finally did this.

well-done man, Superb comparison..

Very funny yet informative. I have subscribed.

Great video! I realize this was a big project. Would Love to see a modern version. Thanks for the effort.

Hey man, very clean, interesting and professional. Good sNice tutorialt.

Thank you for sharing this video I like the way you presented it with no stupid music in the background that interferes with you talking, this video was very helpful👍

Resolve is a beast - especially with Fusion included.

@144kelectedsaints9

4 жыл бұрын

having you taking full advantage of its confusing features? can you mask easily with it and layers ?

@SNORKYMEDIA

3 жыл бұрын

@@144kelectedsaints9 yes i find it easier to understand than AE

@lesserknownfacts7849

3 жыл бұрын

@@144kelectedsaints9 Its hard af

@lesserknownfacts7849

3 жыл бұрын

@@144kelectedsaints9 They are confusing You are right

@SNORKYMEDIA

3 жыл бұрын

@@lesserknownfacts7849 much easier to see what is happening

Great video, thanks! I bought Movie Studio (for me it's the same as Vegas Pro in terms of UI and rendering performance) frankly by accident, but now I am more than happy. I was shocked how fast it renders. Or the other way around: I was shocked, how other software is slow in rendering. If you seek for a software that will help you to work quickly and you need to edit and upload your material fast - there is no better option than Vegas / Movie Studio. And it's not expensive either!

Great review & humor :)

Thanks for this review!! I had read the Vegas was good, and Resolve and Premiere.

Great job 👌🏻💐

I subbed after the sponsor part. xD

This video really convinced me with going for Resolve. I only have the free version and its supposedly abit slower. But still. I need editing and render speed for upcoming videos and Resolve seems to give that.

great video thank you

good job there! thanks

Long live Sony Vergas!

I like this!

Thank you so much

With the latest version of Pinnacle Studio 23 Ultimate, LUT's, scopes and color grading/correction tools that border on professional. Exporting hardware does support Intel/Nvidia and AMD graphics. I also use Vegas Pro 17 Suite. While rendering/exporting is one part of video editing, timeline performance doing the actual editing is what I look for. Vegas is way fast in timeline editing. Pinnacle Studio 23, not as fast, but for the price on sale, it offers a lot of bang for the buck. True the trial version lacks just about everything, but Pinnacle gives you 30 days to use the full version with money back if not for you.

Good video thanks

Just subscribed to your channel bro and do more videos in English you will benefit more in my opinion. As a beginner I my self struggle with subscribers so I wish you all the very best !

Thank's for your comparr. Its gave me answer. Good jop

It's a good comparison video

Nabaz+! Ez jó tartalom volt! 😁🤝

subbed for your awesome sponsor. anyway, have you tried using vegas and render it through adobe media encoder? because i find it best to shirnk my video file size A LOT with this combo while maintaining the video quality, but i cant tell how the render time is doing since i have no way to compare it.

@hmarci

5 жыл бұрын

Thank you! How do you mean? Is there a way to render straight through AMC or you render in Vegas first and reencode later? Because I do the latter with Resolve, since you can't set up a high bitrate in h.264, so I render Cineform or something like that, and reencode in AMC. Vegas lets you customize everything, so I never needed to do that.

From my experience, the best setup for video editors on windows is using intel processor with quicksync and an nvidia gpu with CUDA. I'm only familiar with fcpx, davinci resolve and adobe premiere on both mac and pc. If you use nvidia card with davinci resolve studio, it can push up to 100% gpu usage using nvidia hardware acceleration. The free version of davinci resolve dont have the option though. For premere pro and AE, its still favours raw cpu power. The hardware acceleration option will use quicksync. You can use Daniel2 plugin to accelerate h264/h265 export using nvidia gpu.

I am in the process of switching from Magix pro 10 to Edius Pro 9.5. Almost all my editing is in multi-cam mode. Magix has been horrible for playback, importing is very slow, and render times are generally 1.9 the length of the video. On my system playback in Edius is extremely fluid. You may want to look at the system settings, because you can specify which GPU to use.

wp man thank you!

Thanks. I thought it was just my machine. Well, it probably is partly to blame because it's 5 years old. But at least I see that it's normal for stuff to be slow. And the fact that Pinnacle 23 Ultimate is somewhere in the middle is not bad for the price.

im in the process of switching from vegas to premiere. now im thinking hard whether or not i should proceed. great vid btw.

@hmarci

4 жыл бұрын

Try the newest version of Vegas first!

@topcraft2844

4 жыл бұрын

Premiere has Nesting wich is really handy. I moved to Premiere because of the Nesting feature. It also has faster rendering time. I don't know if Vegas Pro 17 has it yet.

Great job! Any chance of downloading any of your test projects and test clip?

@hmarci

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks. You can see what I did at 6:51 - add the two videos, edit it to 5:00 length, add a LUT and enjoy. I don't have the project files anymore, but here are the video files: mega.nz/#F!nyhmDaAR!9KXfaAfXQRr-DiuHcra_pA

In The setup tNice tutorials was a really helpful video but I'm using soft soft 12, is there a reason why I can't hear my own soft play? I click to play

When I switched to 10bit HDR with heavy color grading Vegas 17 took longer than both Resolve and Premiere for some odd reason.

I used to render my Projects with QSV but editing with Nvidia GTX1650 with intel i5 and my one hour project takes just 35 to 40 minutes maximum. I used to color correct a lot, applying 8 point sharpness and a lot of stabilization in my project.

curious to see a repeat of this with intel 12th gen. Its a good idea doing every year with new processors coming out

Can you make a comparison for Kdenlive vs Openshot vs Shotcut. Thanks.

avid editors use mostly AAF export and render the video outside of avid, in resolve f.ex...

Did Hitfilm ever get their act together with render speed since the making of this video?

I tested Videostudio, PowerDirector, and Vegas in 2004ish, and Vegas was horrendously slower. I might look into it now it's fixed, but then again Resolve looks good.

bhaiya mujha system lena ha kya process hona chaiya mujha davinci video edit or nuendo or fl studio or photoshop or premiere pro rendar fast hone chaiya kitna ka hoga detail da do

I really thank you for taking so much pain.

Noice m8

Davinci Resolve Studio has Nvidia NVENC and AMD VCE too. I dont use Quicktime Movie but when i render mp4 you can choose GPU rendering and it's so much faster than cpu.

@ArcticaLibrary

4 жыл бұрын

So I think Davinci Resolve have the fastest render engine

@hmarci

4 жыл бұрын

Since then, I have been using Davinci and tried both AMD VCE and the regular GPU accelerated rendering. They take almost the same amount of time while VCE uses more of the GPU and a lot less of the CPU. However, AMD VCE rendering results in big artifacts in the resulting video, so I stopped using it!

@ArcticaLibrary

4 жыл бұрын

@@hmarci I heard many people told about it

So you are comparing with MC 8.4.3, it was released back in November 2015. Maybe test again with newer version?

@hmarci

5 жыл бұрын

As soon as they release a free trial version that handles high resolution! :) Or someone cracks it...

Edius & premiere is good in any type of editing but when u edit 2,3 hours video then edius is super fast

I've used PowerDirector ever since 2011 ish and think it's the best but I've found it depends what O/S you have and whether you disable the Antivirus or not Plus opening up task manager and stopping all services that are not needed and it does make a difference. The 16 minute video home movie I just produced on my channel had an absolute ton of specific effects from the video editor itself and if you put a gazillion of those on the editing timeline it will triple or quadruple the time it takes to edit and produce but I tried a trial of Pinnacle studio 26 and I try to edit my top Gun gladiator home movie in 4K maximum and it just couldn't do it an hour later it was struggling but funnily enough I have Pinnacle studio 19 and that breezed through it so I actually used two editors to create the adrenaline top Gun gladiator movie but overall I think power director for me at least is the winner all around but I do not agree and will not pay a monthly fee to borrow their software. I tried avid media composer on a trial in conjunction with Sibelius first and Pro tools first and I found the whole setup to be so bloated and I have tried them in the past and the problem with avid is that there is so much red tape BS and bureaucracy in contacting home that often you can't even get the blooming thing loaded because it is just infatuated with contacting home so I didn't even get started with that. I do have DaVinci resolve but never got around to that and I tried some of the old corel video editors but they didn't offer 4K and Corel refused to give me a trial as apparently I had already had a 30-day trial earlier this year but I was too unwell so screw corel and as for Sony Vegas I actually bought that way back maybe 2012 ish and then when Magix took it over I lost access to my software so in effect they have robbed me of 100 bucks or whatever it was so anyway like I say antivirus and other software can seriously interfere and I have an Acer Nitro 5 with Intel, 3 x 2TB SSD and 32 Gig Ram and quad core but for the future I'm going to incorporate a variety of video editors on each project I do whether it be music or fun tribute movies. I'm not a professional and I'm not prepared to pay a monthly fee for 365 and I personally believe that this new borrowing and paying monthly is the new way for companies to ensure a wage in an ever increasing and competitive software market and it's like asking a teenager whether they want to have a rental car for the rest of their lives I mean personally I like to think that I own the software that I pay money for but I have lost money three times with companies that have disappeared or sold out or whatever so it's a bit of a tempestuous and a very costly pastime unless of course you're a professional earning lots of money with your movies but none of my movies are monetized by myself so I just have to make the best of what I can find. There was one video editor in your list that I never heard of .. Ebius or something ? I'll check that out. Thanks for the video tips, appreciated, have a fabulous week

wish sony'd stick longer with vegas but i love the work of magix team...never switching from vegas

Great video! You deserve many more subscribers. Your actual sponsor Is good 😂 but you deserve one that pays you😂

@hmarci, how did u get 100% usage for at least GPU in Vegas Pro? Followed closely the render settings and stuff but still getting very low GPU usage and only half the CPU usage. 27 mins clip takes 2Hrs to render for a 3700X RTX 2060 Super? Feels something is off for mine. Although I max all core clock at 4GHz at 1.2V but I doubt that matters(?) Any thoughts(?)

@AKSKMY

3 жыл бұрын

Would like to add on that with the same exact settings I'm also getting 4:46 NVIDIA NVENC same rendering settings 4K 50% CPU 50% GPU lol. Using the CUBE LUT Filter also.

@hmarci

3 жыл бұрын

If you have an Nvidia GPU, you have to use NVENC. AMD VCE only works with an AMD GPU.

@AKSKMY

3 жыл бұрын

hmarci Errm yes I’m using NVENC. But yea seems to be varies like I think cuz it’s old videos being recorded (Old Gameplay footage) might be the cause of it. Like only these set of videos stutters a lot in Vegas and Premiere but other videos are ok no frame drops also

@hmarci

3 жыл бұрын

Perhaps it was encoded with a weird codec?

It’s worth noting that if you are using the free version of Resolve, timeline playback isn’t GPU accelerated when using mp4 files. Also, the newer studio version features GPU hardwware export/encode for all 3 technologies (AMD VCE, Intel Quick Sync and Nvidia’s NVENC) when creating H.264 and H.265 files. Also, a 100% free and open source editor is Shotcut. Over the years it’s become very stable, has a powerful feature set and can produce high quality professional results. GPU exports are also supported (which isn’t the case for the free version of Resolve) and I recommend it to people who don’t have powerful hardware or Macs running FCP X.

@hmarci

3 жыл бұрын

Good point. I hadn't heard of Shotcut, will look into it😊

Not to pile on more...but have you worked with Camtasia?

@hmarci

4 жыл бұрын

I haven't. Is it a serious (or half-serious) software? :)

Oh, you use Ableton?

Amazing video!! I have a Ryzen 2600x and an RTX, do you think I could get similar results ?

@hmarci

4 жыл бұрын

Probably better, since the 2600x is almost equivalent to the 1700, and Nvidia cards are much better supported!

@YGROXTV

4 жыл бұрын

@@hmarci Thank you so much bro, amazing video btw, I really loved your commentary and that sponsor part

i started with Vegas Pro then moved to Camtasia Studio and it gave error after error, i’m using Ease Us Video Editor & i’m satisfied.

I think the hollywood editors do is linking ama files in avid... hmmm 🤔

🙏🙏🙏

You think these render results would be pretty much the same with Intell I7 or I9 and a GTX GPU?

@hmarci

4 жыл бұрын

I don't think so! But the bottom line is true everywhere: Resolve is the best option right now. (I might change my opinion when I try Vegas 17 which has improved playback performance...)

Magix Vegas is so intuitive and is the quickest to edit in. It can't be beaten for making quick You Tube videos

Avid is the best NLE out there, it is different, you always transcode while importing OR just link the footage.a NLE is not about how fast it renders, but also how responsive the timeline is and stability is the main point here with avid, it is rock stable, it shine when you import 1000 hours of footage, its probably not suited for youtubers. :) I like your video, thanx for sharing. keep them coming. :) BTW you forgot the Lightworks 14.5 a speedy NLE. :)

@hmarci

5 жыл бұрын

I think pro filmmakers could also do a lot better than Avid. Imagine the time (=money) saved when using something else, for example Resolve, 15.2 is also stable and is being continuously improved. Thanks for watching. :)

@hmarci

5 жыл бұрын

@Nathaniel Walker Now I finally know why people use Avid at all, thank you. :) But I will unapologetically stick to my opinion about Resolve being much better than Premiere. I use both on a daily basis, and Premiere is a pain most of the time. Not to mention how most of the people I know had to downgrade to CC2018 due to constant crashes and file format errors.

@df3yt

5 жыл бұрын

@@hmarci But responds Resolve wants me to use Nvidia...I prefer the AMD experience esp on Linux

@ra9004

5 жыл бұрын

@@hmarci Resolve may seem faster at first, but in the long run Avid is unmatched, i.e. its very very reliable. whereas resolve is not reliable enough yet imo

@d.edwardsfreelanceeditorvi4212

5 жыл бұрын

Resolve is definitely making waves but would you trust a 200 million movie on it? Its harder for Avid to make changes as they stay backwards compatible. You can open a project from 10 yrs ago and edit like it was a new project. They have to stay loyal to broadcast and film companies so yea they are slow on new features. Not to say that Avid doesn't have bugs but overall the stability of avid is key. Once resolve becomes more stable as an editing program it is possible for them to take over.I like resolve and slowly making my move over. I probably won't give up my on my Avid. And there is a free version of MC, they are trying to attract the new generation.

EXCELENTE VIDEO!!! Could you reanalize releases today? Very thanks and sub!

Most editors use x.264 for h.264 video streams, hence should take the same rendering time, with same settings and no fancy transitions or effects. Problem is that you can't set the same settings in the editors. But in principle, they shouldn't vary to much.

Currently I am using amd vega 56 with Intel. I7 4770 cpu in vegas pro 16 But my render with amd vce GPU just use 17. Percent average. Should I switch my GPU with amd rx 480

@hmarci

3 жыл бұрын

absolutely not

does anyone know where i can get the pirated version of soft soft

Nice video sir help me how pc amd 3600 or i5

You got 1 like from me, india ....

I only have 32GB Ram, is it enough for rendering 4K 60fps video?

@hmarci

4 жыл бұрын

of course

I think PowerDirector is good for what I need for the price. That’s something to consider.

I Googled exactly "Filmora vrs Premier Pro rendering time" and the first link is your video. And no Filmora. I paid and have Filmora for 6-7 years now but the lack of fancy options like motion tracking is pushing me toward Premier Pro. But the huge deal breaker is rendering time and size of the video. I made two same videos in Filmora and in After effects, Filmora 220 MB (1080HD crisp clean), AE 1.2 GB, same quality. Filmora 5 minutes, AE 30 minutes or maybe more, I went to make popcorn. Any info on that? Thank you. And, please, I put all my money 2016 into this PC so I can use it until retirement, will it explode if I put all Adobe programs on him? Intel(R) Core(TM) ¡5-6400 CPU @ 2.70GHz 2.70 GHz RAM 32.0 GB; NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti; ASRock B150 Pro4/3.1, Kingston V300 240GB SSD, SATA.

@hmarci

4 жыл бұрын

Well, I didn't mention Filmora anywhere in the description, but someone in the comments did I think. If they are the same codec, the file size difference comes from different bitrates. For 1080p h.264, 20 or even 10 Mbps is perfectly fine and yields a good looking result, but you can still render a lot bigger file with no apparent benefits if you want to. But in your case I think you might be using different codecs? Don't forget that Premiere and After Effects are not the same software! One is for editing, one is for VFX and compositing. So don't expect good results in After Effects. I don't know how far you are from retirement, but this config will handle 1080p footage just fine and could last you several years. It will handle every Adobe software. However, I'm not sure if the GPU can run Resolve, but try it and if it can, use that. It's just better.

@MarinaArtDesign

4 жыл бұрын

@@hmarci After watching your video and a bunch of others I decided to go with Resolve. The test on the beggining told me PC is OK, but I still have to make some projects to find out. I have 30-40 years till retirement :) officially, but if I do my job well during this year I could retire early. If you would be kind and tell me what is the biggest problem with my configuration? When I was buying I asked to give me something that will not be garbage in 10 years.

@hmarci

4 жыл бұрын

@@MarinaArtDesign In my opinion the graphics card is the weakest part, HOWEVER, for most editing tasks the graphics card is not utilised anyways. So start working and when you feel like your PC is slowing you down considerably, then think about upgrading again :)

интересно что такое профили сжатия этот парень знает?

I've never got avid to work. thats after using it for months at a tv station.

Vegas Pro for life! It is the best app out there! #vegaspro

@144kelectedsaints9

4 жыл бұрын

thats what i want to believe, but eventually if your going to go into 3d modeling like blenders, then prmiere would be better right?

@Erismaar1Joost

4 жыл бұрын

144k Elected Saints well, I use blender a lot and in combination with Vegas. I do not see why I should Première for that instead.

@144kelectedsaints9

4 жыл бұрын

@@Erismaar1Joost can you get the 3d render files from blender and import to sony vegas where you can move them in a 3d fashion within vegas? or do you simply create the 3d animation on blender and then save it as a video where you then import it to vegas for 2d editing?

@Erismaar1Joost

4 жыл бұрын

@@144kelectedsaints9 Yes that's how it basicly works. You can export in very high quality in Blender. Vegas will work with alpha channels as well.

@144kelectedsaints9

4 жыл бұрын

@@Erismaar1Joost thank you for the answer. for now I'm rooted with the choice of using vegas for quality yet fast production turn arounds. you can give a novice 1 brush and 2 paints and he will say theirs not much you can do with it, give it to a creative pro and with 1 brush and just 1 paint he can create a masterpiece...... an analogy to what I heard some one say earlier, that theirs nothing premiere had that he couldn't get done in vegas.

Nice job. Good info. Support this guy. Subscribe.

my favourite is premiere pro and filmora 9

Bro love your video ... in my opinion pls double your ram ....

10:14 how yo make this

😃😃😃😃😃

DaVinci resolve is absolutely I credible and it's ACTUALLY free.

I've just got premiere pro and it is really annoying the fact everytime I move a clip I need to render in and out to get a smooth playback. I can edit videos quicker on my phone. I know pp has alot more features but I'm sure adobe could sort this out. I'm going to cancel my subscription with adobe.

amd 2700 is best for ..this time 2020 4k video edting pc .. please answer me ..sir .....

@hmarci

4 жыл бұрын

It all depends on your budget.

@kamalyadav3024

4 жыл бұрын

@@hmarci sir I am confused 2700 vs 3600 vs 9600k .. best for 4k .. editing

Unfortunately Vegas stutters and lags horribly with H265 HEVC files. You cannot even preview and edit the files.

@D0x1511af

3 жыл бұрын

nah VP 17 and 18 fix that.... now VP 17 support 4.4.44 ACES

Is Edius still around? Totally forgot about that NLE. Just started getting familiar with Resolve, coming from all versions of Vegas, and I have to say it isn't as intuitive as I hoped it would be. Some features are clunky and some pretty cool. I miss the auto crossfades that Vegas has including the velocity envelopes, wish those features would be standard in every NLE.

@hmarci

5 жыл бұрын

I agree. Or I wish they just updated the Vegas playback engine so it would be up to today's standards.

@arsh0603

4 жыл бұрын

DelusionaryKiller resolve fusion is just too slow. Resolve ONLY shines in the color page. I own the studio version and im starting to hate it a bit. 😭

"But there is no free trial and I'm not gonna pay for this shit" LOL

Welp, guess I need to upgrade from Vegas 13 :p

Only one I came on here for was lightworks vs premiere pro. Lightworks is the only one you left out ugh. Good vid though

Check out TMPGenc or Lightworks

your'e using an ANCIENT avid media composer version (even when you posted this video). like years and years old. They have a brand new media engine so... yeah the avid real results would be absolutely different with the correct version haha.

Where is Lightworks?

Try Corel video studio and filmora.

My specification is i7-7700K + Geforce 1060 GTX + Cyberlink PowerDirector 19.0 and use your clip 5:01:10 minutes , I use GPU render and the result is 90 second finish.

@hmarci

4 жыл бұрын

Nice!

Shame you didn't have Corel VideoStudio in there.

@MoonOvIce

3 жыл бұрын

Very hard to find videos about how good or bad Corel videostudio is. It seems fast and really easy to use for me, but may not be as feature rich as others.

i litterally stopped using sony vegas just because of rendering times.

I use edius 8.53 for my weddings editing and I used to work more than 15 sequences final output will FHD H264. most of the imported project file will be minimum 50 to 60 GB and some case it may be more than 500 GB in size. (those will be multi camera coverage). all I used to import and work with several sequences and finally I nest it for it's export. the final output will be mostly around three hours long sometimes. that for I spend one and half hours to render with intel quick sync export. that is inbuilt graphics card of my i5 motherboard. For my regular editing I have Nvidia Graphics card GTX 1650. it is not supporting to export its hardware rendering with edius.Not knowing the reason. I used to apply color correction, stabilizer, Adding Sharpness even bulk of 3D transitions. ( that too Whole project)

Movie Maker for windows 7 anyone?

I'm trying to edit approximately 230 hours of multi cam footage. I tried Video Pro X as the sync works great but it wouldn't even playback. Vegas keeps crashing. Adobe Premier only shows software export, hardware disabled. My hardware is AMD 2700, 2600. GPU RX480 and RX580. Also have an Intel 8700 with 1070. The AMD renders faster and smoother than the Intel though on all but the Adobe export. Video editing sucks. It's common knowledge AMD gives better quality on GPU renders yet Nvidia pays the devs to do CUDA instead of proper OpenCL.

@hmarci

5 жыл бұрын

Wow, I feel your pain! Maybe try editing in smaller chunks, separate projects and compile them in the end?

@df3yt

5 жыл бұрын

@@hmarci I am breaking them. Thing is I had 3 permanent cameras fitted to my plane. I recorded 6 hours per day. For almost 12 days for circumnavigating the country. Now the edit...I used Premiere years ago and made the switch to Vegas due to its speed during the editing process. I currently manually sync and man it's time consuming. The one camera records for 30 mins then creates new file, the other 20 and 15... So am desperate to find a app that works. As I retail PC hardware I have my choice of components. The AMD platform tends to give the best experience in terms of CPU and GPU. Fwiw the 480 kills the 1070 on Vegas' optimised presets. It's only FHD but Magix Pro 10 falls over. As a sidenote the ADATA X11 Gamix is a great investment over your Samsung SSD. Also with AMD boards you don't lose a SATA port. Intel you do...when using NVMe. Ps thanks for doing this comparison I recognise and commend the effort into making the above video!

@ra9004

5 жыл бұрын

these are the kind of scenarios where AVID shines

We are your sponsor, with out money,,,,