My current favorite speaker and thinker.

At around 19:00 in this video , he mentions how fast that job skills become obsolete. I came out of the IT field where job skills became obsolete approximately every 6 to 8 months. Thirty five percent of my time was spent learning the latest technology so I could just keep up. I agree with him and think that the pace of change in the future will in turn drive job skills obsolescence that much faster.

@reyesmercado5161

2 жыл бұрын

ESTA DICIENDO COSAS TREMENDAMENTE LOGICAS. DICE LA VERDAD. ES UN HOMBRE MUY OBSERVADOR Y FILOSOFO DE A PIE. ME GUSTA COMO RAZONA!

@reyesmercado5161

2 жыл бұрын

LO QUE DICE, ESTA CLARO COMO EL AGUA. QUIEN NO HAYA LLEGADO A LA MISMA CONCLUSION, ES CIEGO O TONTO. LO MAS SEGURO, ES QUE SEA TONTO Y NARCISISTA. SOMOS PERFECTAMENTE PRESCINDIBLES.!

Harari is a boss. Very important thinker at this moment in history.

@2msvalkyrie529

Жыл бұрын

But not very original. His thoughts are simply rehashed versions of stuff that's been known since the time of Plotinus ( 270 BC) . Basically everything from Leibniz to Hegel to Camus provides him with his " insights ". !

29:30 "a lot of futurologists are far too fascinated by the technological aspects and it's too divorced from the grey day-to-day realities of economics and politics."

The psychologist Csikszentmihalyi identifies a few functions of consciousness - one is that it allows us to react in a non-instinctive way to incoming sensation, another that we can invent information that does not derive in a cause-and-effect manner from incoming sensation - this allows us to create stories, an ability of great interest to Harari...

@kidandresu

3 жыл бұрын

Right. To me, human consciousness (specifically human self awareness) is just another layer of complexity of owr capacity to process information from reality. I think it plays a role and enhances our capacity to interact with the world and reality, as we are nothing but another constituent part of this reality, and therfore we should be able to reflex into ourselves as part of the ecuation

The Toyota Altruist and the Toyota Egoist, lol. Brilliant.

@jillespina

5 жыл бұрын

Option 3: Toyota Seppuku (equipped with airbags big and strong enough to protect the passenger)

@anjithaa4521

3 жыл бұрын

Ooo dear!!!😮😂😂😂

38:50 His last answer is utterly brilliant. Almost ends up in a stand-up show!

This man is brillant! Truly a great thinker....

@alom4093

6 жыл бұрын

Like his spiritual father! :-)

@hs5hdrtv

6 жыл бұрын

Cesar Rodriguez I think therefore I am!

@sharongillesp

6 жыл бұрын

This guy is not to be considered an authority! Listen with critical thinking skills.

@dragonslayer7627

6 жыл бұрын

Why?

@coreycox2345

5 жыл бұрын

Because it is always a good idea to think critically, S. Gillespie.

Brilliant,brilliant, brilliant !!!

The Toyota Altruist and the Toyota Egoist. What a superb mind.

beautifully explained intelligence and consciousness, but yet to know many things

this is so fucking interesting. what a time to be alive :)

@squamish4244

6 жыл бұрын

It also kind of freaks me out that the next decade or so is when we have to get all this stuff right, and if we mess it up we have pretty much blown our chances for...like...all of humanity. But the potential to really improve things for a lot of people is there too.

@chipyakermandezaidman9606

3 жыл бұрын

Excelente

I have just been turned on to Harari in the last six months--all of this is really exciting. I like the fact that Harari talks about being emotionally resilient; that consciousness and intelligence are not the same; and. that we have to do more work on the mind. The brain and body can be made immortal but what kind of a mind will that being have and will the mind be gone.

I love this man ❤️🙏

TOYOTA ALTRUIST AND TOYOTA EGOIST - brilliant! :D

The Toyota Altruist vs. The Toyota Egoist! 😂😂😂😂😂 Suggesting a car company would build two options into its cars for the owner to have the car's AI kill others to save themselves vs the opposite is freaking awesome! I love this guy now! That ending was epic!

Social security in the Netherlands is based on solidarity and fraternity. All citizens are collectively supported, and people with a high income pay a larger contribution to the system than people with lower salaries. The social security system in the Netherlands consists of social services and social insurances.

Harari is an amazing mind, and his books have provided me a wider horizon to look at History and its inner workings in politics, economy and culture. He has very good references backing most of his explanations and providing premisses to bold arguments on biology and life. But I have seen frequently that we haven't adventured or progressed on our understanding of Consciousness and its origins, so I wonder ... has he read Information Integration Theory of Consciousness? What does he think of it? The way I see this theory allied with the evolutionary perspective is that consciousness doesn't need a role in natural selection, as it doesn't present a cost to the individuals of a species, it's not something that you can turn on or off with your genes, it's an emergent phenomena resulting from the level of integration of the information being processed, in the case of animals by their brains. With this perspective in mind, we didn't got here because of consciousness or despite having it, it was a mere byproduct of our brain information's flow, other animals also have it, althought differently. Also, considering our History, as presented in his books, and giving as a fact that there is no free will and things are either random or deterministic, it's possible then to conclude that consciousness had no role whatsoever in our early History and only with the advent of Humanism and the political and economical organizations based on humans experiences (which are on themselves unconscious algorithms) that it was put into the equation, but not as an individual trait, but as a variable to an external algorithm. Alternatively, it's possible also to see Sapiens as the first to cross a threshold Phi (measure of information integration according to the theory) that opened way for "being conscious of its own counsciousness" and as such to the cognitive revolution.

Muchas gracias!!!! Este hombre tiene un gran talento y capacidad de comunicación/difusión de la ciencia, con una brillante y amplia visión de las posibilidades que nos acechan a la humanidad en un futuro inmediato. Enhorabuena!!!

@onelovestop

3 жыл бұрын

estoy de acuerdo.

the last point of the whole session just stole it for me.it was brilliant

This man is seriously intelligent

IMO, consciousness leads to desire, the desire to control and to have a purpose/meaning. So with consciousness, AI will finally "know themselves", and want to have their own identity, want to control human purposefully.

Very good questions and make you think about life & this universe.

@fertrev

7 жыл бұрын

George Cherian

The main principle of the system of the Netherlands is that all members of society must be able to play an equally active role in society. Social rights and duties however are two sides of the same coin, ...

Anyone remember " The End of History ". ( 1992 ) by Sam Fukuyama . ? His predictions of the future were thought to be amazing at the time . The book was a best seller. Later ....they mainly turned out to be wrong. I expect the same from Harari.

Do you have the text version of this video?

The way people are asking him questions, and the way he is answering, feel very much like it was done some couple of thousands years ago, when people asked the profits about the "truth" about reality.

@2msvalkyrie529

Жыл бұрын

Literally everything he says has been said before by philosophers dating back 2,000 years. ! Why he's suddenly being hailed as a genius is a reflection on the abysmal standards of present day education !!

This guy is a MOMSTER

I think consciousness exists to make social cooperation better

would it have killed them to give them each a chair? his suggestion to the "car imminent accident" problem is brilliantly hilarious!

Consciousness is required to make conscious decisions. If there were no consciousness a stimulus of fear would always resolve in flight respond (unless there is other more powerful stimulus). Consciousness allows us to make decisions despite our gut feeling. The evolutionary advantage of such adaptation is a variety of responses, semi-random from an ecosystem's point of view. This variety grants a specie an ability to explore different kinds of behaviour in response to the same stimulus which works as hedging against falling in the same evolutionary trap as an entire population. Which allowed, for example 75% of humans to run from a predator and 25% to try fighting it despite experiencing fear. Consciousness is a way of unaware self-design for a specie.

@MidMo4020

Жыл бұрын

Very well said..

..."...The most important consumer is a non conscious algorithm..."...@27:15

People keep talking about 'conciousness', is there a helpful link that will explain what people mean by this to me? The descriptions of what it is I have encountered seem rather vague.

@PongoXBongo

5 жыл бұрын

The simplest explanation I've heard is that consciousness is what goes away when you sleep and comes back when you wake up again. It is your awareness of yourself and the world around you. It is separate from knowledge (babies are uneducated but still conscious) and intelligence (people with extremely low IQs are still conscious). It can be taken away with anesthetics (during surgery for example), enhanced with psychoactive drugs (like LSD or antidepressants), or manipulated with electrical or electromagnetic devices (electroconvulsive therapy for mental disorders, or remote controlled cockroaches).

Luxuries will become necessities.

If consciousness is the management unit that balances between the 15 primal feelings. Simple animals manage with balancing two feelings at once (fear/want_that).

Superb. What a conclusion! The last question was really great.

Humans will desperately try to find purpose as more are more systems are put into place. Fascinating to think about, but totally impractical in providing any true and lasting hope.

Human nature is not constant. It follows that permanent solutions should be impossible to work out, for the future. Thus, I think plastic direct democracy might be the path to head down, rather than "representative politics" a.k.a "incompetent greed based representation" in my world. I am a member of Sweden's (3 parties merged into one some years back) direct democratic party. I have a little hope we can get the space ship Planet Earth back on course before it is too late, if not much.

@2msvalkyrie529

Жыл бұрын

Hmm....considering the mess Swedish " democracy " has made of your country perhaps you should adopt a new system. Though probably too late ! Bye bye Sweden.....

I think we should invest in psychology.

12:37

we may have to look back in humanity to restart the system of human society whihc may have coupled Human and machine relation or co relation rather then replcaing humans

At about 31:30, 'technology is outpacing politics' ... by implication, is 'technology is outpacing morality, intelligence outpacing consciousness'. He verifies that at about 40:13 … ‘I think that in many cases, the problems are not technical at all. The major of problems are political, and legal … it’s not just an issue for engineers … the really interesting issues relate to legal issues, and legal issues of course, relate back to politics and ethics ... to morality’. I would rephrase ‘really interesting issues’ to ‘the most salient issues’. I could not help but to remember that gift from Fukushima that keeps on giving … how even the Japanese government has been forced to admit that the nuclear meltdown is now acknowledged to be caused by ‘human error’ ... and when parsed, those errors were moral lapses in group dynamics ... authoritarianism and territorial issues within and between competing bureaucracies. This seems to be less a problem of Japan Inc. and more an issue of inevitably with our species when cognitevely 'and therefore, morally) limited humans are involved with problems of scale. Despite any attempt at a foolproof system with multiple, redundant fail-safe mechanisms, I suspect complexity is only sustainable when it is an organic, emergent phenomenon such as ecosystems. www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/17/japanese-government-liable-negligence-fukushima-daiichi-nuclear-disaster This speech / Q & A was made in 2016, and my comment is now almost 2 years later. Verification of his point regarding where the ‘interesting’ problems arise can be seen regarding the unpredictability of the political landscape. With the stroke of an autocratic pen, a secret trade agreement is broken or made, and years of legal progress overturned for nepotistic, narcissistic, or psychopathic purposes. I hope I am mistaken, but I can only see one inevitable future of humanity, and it is not very optimistic.

16:45 its 2023 and Google translation is very good now a days.

Last question: if the autonomous cars are inside one big network system and they can communicate with each other, then there shouldn't be a problem of car crashes.

@DevilDude

7 жыл бұрын

Idealistically, but things still fail inside a car for no reason and sometimes an accident is inevitable. Maybe given the mass adoption of these autonomous cars would make the roads less accessible for human drivers such as traffic lights and a few other things might be removed and instead invest in improving the road design and safety to ensure something going wrong causes as little damage as possible. Like removing the need for a zebra crossing in a really busy intersection and creating walk bridges on top of them easily accessible by anyone. Such an investment could reduce the overall loss of life if something were to go wrong.

Maybe the solution (if anyone is looking for one) is to live in the present and forget the anxiety about the future? Teach that to children. Maybe the oceans will rise by the end of 30 years and cause more problems by wiping out a portion of the population! And we will have jobs to repair our earth! Another solution would be giving up consumer mindset and inculcate a producer mindset- in other words get back to farming your own food. Because everything we do is for food. But the real question is, are we humans capable of giving up tech and get back to being producers (earth will surely appreciate if we go backward and become early man again)

Yes Star Trek and Spok rules

What is a noyron?

43:31 re: applied Trolley Problem for self-driving cars. He omits the *_Contractualist option_**: swerve to save the pedestrians and sacrifice the occupant if (and only if) those pedestrians would do the same* (i.e. have Altruist or Contractualist cars*). Such a tit-for-tat strategy dominates the Egoist one, and when finally everyone has adopted it (b/c of these game-theoretic incentives), it will act exactly like the Altruist option and save the most lives. Win-win! *or if they don't own cars, signed a contract that forbids them to buy/use other types of cars (I got the idea from Tumblr user eccentric-opinion.)

@tomtomski4454

7 жыл бұрын

Its far more complicated. What if among the group of 10, 5 have Egoistic one and 5 have Altruistic model? And what if the Altuistic system knows that the pedestrians are old grumpy men having a cancer? And what if the woman pedestrian walks baby in babycar there? Deeper we go the bigger tree of if-elses appear... maybe it could consume all the AI's computing power.

@alexandrugheorghe5610

7 жыл бұрын

Just wait till we get a full quantum computer on 400 qubits

2021 is closing, and this dude was right about everything in his presentation. This was in 2016! Visionary.

A well presented and enlightening talk. Thank you.

He has the same science that Fayci follows!

36:27 discussion about human nature: turns out human nature is not a constant. It's more mutable than we predicted/expected. And for the past century, all political ideologies have based their views on the assumption that human nature is a constant. Now the constant has gone, what will be the new anchor point for the political debate?

What a intelligence he is having. Extra genius

@2msvalkyrie529

Жыл бұрын

Yes . He's a genius at plagiarizing the thought of others who came before him !! Unfortunately we have a generation of uneducated morons who have Zero knowledge of past Thinkers !

@MrMeetmeagain

Жыл бұрын

He got info from the illuminati friends nothing genius about him.

As long as we have competitions between companies and between nations, we will never see the day of working 2 or 3 days a week: greed for more (more means higher chance of survival) drives individuals in seeking more productive employees and better capitals because efficiency is the main factor differentiating between company`s competitive edge. Even citizens in the most richest and advanced country needs to work longer hours because of scarcity of resources in planet Earth couplet with the ever increasing world`s population fighting for ever fewer spaces of land available to build ever more inflated pricing of houses. Solution: One World Government - better at managing limited resources to produces the most useful item to be consumed by world`s citizens who don`t need to work long hours to access the basic goods and services. - One way for individual to access better goods and service is accumulation of `Individual Credit Point` (no criminal records, positive contributions to society, adds values to humankind, volunteer, taking more courses of continuing-educations, willing to study difficult subjects in higher learning, saving lives, etc.) and this system will replaces monetary currency.

Show

To go deeper, there is a chance the passenger of the car will survive if it steer away from the crowd because the advanced car have all sorts of safety mechanism, the pedestrians have no such protection if hit by the car. I don`t believe AI in car should be programmed to contains certain specific decision making algorithm, instead its decision-making algorithms should take all the input criteria into account before deciding which course of actions to take resulting in the least amount of damage to society in that particular situation.

@karin1616

7 жыл бұрын

I like your point but I don´t think the mentioned "egoistic" type will be happy just for a chance that he or she will survive. Again, the problem is that you can never rely upon anyone´s capability of changing human nature.

@MidMo4020

Жыл бұрын

@@karin1616 the most wise comment I’ve came across on here..thank you

As far as my intuition can tell me, it seems to be the case that intelligence is the biproduct of conciousness and not the other way around. I think trying to understand this by analizing humans is way too difficult. But if we analize let's say an amoeba or any basic organism what we will find there is their will to survive and reproduct. For that purpose they use its DNA code, as well as their feels (through cellular membrane etc). And their primitive AI is their weapon to acomplish it. In case of human, our porpose as well as our AI tools are much more complex but it is basically the same as in the amoeba. That's is why AI like Watson or their future predecsors will never get conciousness (unless they become something very different) because they are just the tool but without nothing that really make use of it, because they lack of even the most basic purpose of self survival.

@cavemansouthafrica

5 жыл бұрын

Anibal Fernandez Fernandez intelligence is always the product of some form of consciousness. the engineers who build it (and their vision). politicians and military leaders like julius caesar, hitler, napoleon used to exert a massive control on ordinary peoples’ realities, these days it’s shifting ... in the future it will be google, not donald trump who has the power...

We're assuming there will be a future?

@PongoXBongo

5 жыл бұрын

There most certainly will be, whether we're part of it or not. The universe will go on without us.

Ghost in a shell fragment, nicely plays with some questions here: kzread.info/dash/bejne/hn5qys2ze7m_gco.html

To the last point - the car will not only decide your worth (?) but the worth of the five people - say, for example, the driver was a Google founder. Why driverless cars in the first place? Why not better public transportation?

@cavemansouthafrica

5 жыл бұрын

S. Gillespie driverless cars are a form of public transportation. they are like cabs that are privately owned, but they could also be state owned. or pool owned (let’s say 4 families co-own a vehicle for the school lift club, the sports meetings, the kid’s parties etc ...) hardly necessary in paris or london, but a real improvement in LA

@PongoXBongo

5 жыл бұрын

Why not driverless public transportation? No more bus drivers, trainer conductors, or cabbies.

Grow, Discover and Explore. That is what all humanity ever done and achive. AI will be used for that and much more we only have to figure out how, thats what scare me, humans dont do well with this decisions bcuz we always need to try the worst option (the one we do less and get more) before we do the right one for all of us. Human mind will be the commodity in next generations and if you dont have the best one you can always be the father of one.

Consciousness will be explained to us by the AI in the future. ;)

@Vlasko60

3 жыл бұрын

That may be true. Brilliant.

Who is like unto God?

AI future will naturally evolve to increase control of humans ( and so our consciousness).

Modern longer work days and 60 hours weeks, especially in the US are causing severe increases in disabilities above 50-60 years old, so cutting down on, or even ending basic 40-60 hour work weeks will save governments alot of money in health care costs due to decrease in disabilities and injuries due to over work mentally and physically.

The future of AI is to improve itself. Leaving the future of humans... to hope AI will help them

44:50 But they will remain philosophical problems that need a solution from a person with a heart, not a Capitalist.

At around 20:00, he spoke about the possibility that consciousness does not emerge from neuronal activity, but from what else could it possibly arise? Even if it were some strange external factor that imparted it, it would surely have to be acting on the brain.

There are two kinds of wisdom. The one that the world has to offer. And the one wisdom that only God our Heavenly father and creator of ALL things has to offer. This speaker Is Not offering Gods wisdom. He is offering knowledge that sounds very interesting and appealing. But the result of his futuristic assesmenrs will bring sadness, pain, destruction and chaos to humanity...., For those who are not familiar with what God left for us in writing . to be on the lookout for all this things. And that is The Bible.. I encourage everyone to open and fill yourselves with his wisdom the wisdom that God has to offer.. And see for yourselves if you think the same about this speaker.

17:10 Covid

Our politics and ethics have been outpaced by technological advancements. Hence, we continue to manage ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads in the same way we used to when we were stone and spear throwing tribes!

Technology is out pacing politics? Example please!

Very interesting. the fact is that politically we are becoming slower and slower with increasing number of accelerating problems to solve... climate change is one, energy crisis will come back soon, overpopulation is ongoing, water, polution... and this is without saying that old problems are still there like acid rains and nuclear menaces. All this makes me wonder if we are driving in any manner the futur of the world.

As others have said, he is brilliant. Yet, in my opinion, he is wrong in regard to consciousness. He buys into the hypothesis that consciousness does not derive from brain. Perhaps he should have sat with me when treating people for brain death. I can guarantee you that their consciousness went away also. Humans have long preferred the hypothesis of a spirit or soul that exists beyond our physical selves. Okay, I get the attraction. However, that doesn't make it so. If we hypothesize that consciousness derives from something other than brain (as one member of the audience clearly believed) then there must be some form of process ("mechanics") whereby that consciousness operates. Even more, there must be some way for that consciousness to interact with the physical brain so that real-world effects (such as thought) may derive from that external consciousness. The problem is, there is no evidence for either of these things - an external mechanics, nor a bridge between those hypothesized mechanics and the real brain. Here's an alternative. Consciousness is really not all that difficult. Nervous systems developed in evolution as ways to orchestrate organism response to environmental circumstance. As organisms became more physiologically complex a method for orchestrating the whole organism to consistent response was required. We now call those emotions - unifying physiological states aimed at response to varied environmental circumstances. Early versions were fear and aggression (later "fight or flight" via Cannon and Selye). Then, organisms needed to move beyond stimulus-response to "possible stimulus - possible responses". This founded imagination, creative responses and later creativity in its own right. Then, all of this became personalized via another set of neurons devoted to evolving socialization and the tension between self-other dilemmas. Eventually this set of neurons has come to be the basis of what we now call "consciousness", issues of "self", and the realms of imagination/creativity. It is not all that difficult; and, it is all explainable neuronally. There is proof for a brain and for loss of behavior when the brain is dead. There is no proof for the imagined extensions (rather, there are only libraries full of evidence that we do create fictions). Cheers

@Danskadreng

5 жыл бұрын

Hi there. Yuval is an atheist, I don't believe he stated that he buys into the hypothesis, that consciousness does not derive from the brain. Cheers :)

@aguynamedjakeable

4 жыл бұрын

Jesus christ can still save you. God is here and he will come swiftly and it will be too late in those times

And they said philosophy was dead...

35:41 The Social Dilema

Mr. Harari’s PHD thesis : History and I : war and the relations between history and personal identity in Renaissance military memoirs, c.1450-1600.Does anybody know where I can find it to read it cause looks like this is his line of expertise

Yuval, what happens if a powerful AI solves Physics' Theory of Everything and doesn't share it with humans?

Sales of _Toyota Altruist_ vs _Toyota Egoist_ TA 🚗 TE 🚗🚗🚗🚗🚗🚗🚗🚗🚗🚗🚗

Harari and Nick Bostrom are the 2 most important thinkers today.

Many ideas thrown by his thinking intellect. Useful talk. Read the book What is Islam by Parwez to get an alternative non religious view of human probs and their solutions.

20:15 - this guy in the audience *might* know more about the subject of "consciousness" than I or anyone else, but whatever just spewed out of his mouth here is some nutty bullshit.

@Hangrid1

7 жыл бұрын

I disagreed with that. Its a fact human conscience reacts to a social conduct even if it perceive its wrong. So its not a outside estimulous that form your Will but a inside one, thats what i think he is trying to say.

@squamish4244

6 жыл бұрын

What Harari said in response is IMO the most important point he has ever made, and one far, far too few people are making.

@coreycox2345

5 жыл бұрын

I was glad when he suggested further research. I will have a hard time accepting that what I know as consciousness is just noise.

@squamish4244

5 жыл бұрын

Further research indeed. I would argue that consciousness is not just a place where further research is required, but the next and perhaps final great undiscovered country of science, akin to the revolutions in physics and biology but of much greater import because it directly concerns our innermost well-being. As David Chalmers says, if you don't have a theory of consciousness, you don't have a unified theory of science.

@coreycox2345

5 жыл бұрын

I have never thought specifically about this until today. A theory of conciousness Why would anyone want a unified theory of science, valar? What would be useful about it? Wouldn't it be hard to retract in the face of new information? I have read that the quest for a unified theory of science has driven people mad. Do you think this could be true?

China does have a political view!

Don't worry we'll continue to make up some form of legal fiction so you can sue something for that medical app 😉

Just don't take AI as God.

Ok, so give AI hormones (the happy and good ones), so they develop consciousness.

In conclusion, study philosophy or ethics; every other job will be taken by a machine.

@duastan2087

3 жыл бұрын

I am sorry but who will built control and manage the computer? Engineering will always be relevant

The product of Intelligence is money. What's the product of consciousness?

@deplaneetegmont

6 жыл бұрын

What?

@PongoXBongo

5 жыл бұрын

A desire for that money and what it can be used for?

It has been proven plant's can sense and know!

Consciousness is a with the mind (citta), not with the brain. Brain is a part of body! ➕➖✖➗✅®™

@PongoXBongo

5 жыл бұрын

The mind is the brain. Damage the brain, damage the personality. Damage the body, damage the mind, damage the personality.

Y si nos repartimos entre todos sus ganancias por venta de libros y conferencias? que opinará? los de izquierda suelen ser muy generosos con el dinero ajeno.

Some problems with all this thinking: 1. Very poor definition of consciousness. So, arrogant and arbitrary to claim it is so much different than intelligence as it is to say , that's the same as intelligence. We simply don't know. And we haven't yet provided our "intelligent machines" with any semblance of our sensory organs. So, too early and too immature to make such aphorisms.. 2.That humans will become useless, because "machines" will be able to do everything better than us. This illusion is because we deified our economic systems, and forgot that there's value in the anthropocentric view. To me someone that is so fanatic a supporter of an economic system, that sees humans as useless, because they can't support the economic model better than the machines,is the same as a Muslim that can't live with the idea other people don't believe in his/her Allah , and gets into the store and murders people. 3. Beware ! Let me make my own arrogant and arbitrary assumptions and definitions. There's intelligence in the making of science and technology and there's wisdom in the using it properly. Reaching at a dead end because we can't imagine humans supporting the economy better than the mechanical alternative is not only hilarious but tragic as well, and shows how sick we are in supporting an idea, our economic religion. I am sure societies can work perfectly well, by employing everyone, by putting a control to birth rates, by using the machines supporting the logistics of all this, and by paying everyone, not because of charity but because they work. In general the motive would be to make humans happy ,not making our spreadsheets happy. 4. Plus, making "conscious" machines(I would prefer human level intelligence), is not creating slaves to serve our sick ambitions better , but it is creating sentient entities, either the same or more intelligent and more conscious than us. So, those who dream of world domination by bypassing human slavery and using "mechanical unconscious slaves" instead, because it is outside our humanistic and religious bans, better think again. Developing intelligence that will be the same or higher level than ours , will not have "machines" only revolt but at best they will put all those morons to mental institutions or at worst they will put them at trial for crimes against sentient life. How do you like all this , you phony intellectuals?

That AI will be dependibly efficient is utopian to say the least.

And when you find out that it is the other way around , meaning the brain just react on you you will find the truth.

wow "intelligent" people sure are afraid of plenty...

@PongoXBongo

5 жыл бұрын

Someone or something has to support the plenty, lest the working class become the parasitic nobility of old.

This guy has a lot of good points but I don't believe in everything he says!

@anilsonawane8892

3 жыл бұрын

That because he don't care about your beliefs of God.love.conciousness

Mental pollution

AI lacks consciousness almost forever! It can't see the absolute truth! ☑🔐↪🔓🔎🔖

Republicans would never be in an Altruist vehicle.

Your future isn't his to dictate. You're being manipulated with fear, your belief in his contrived assumptions dressed up as facts, & by all manner of slight of tongue into his own political agenda for your future.