>>>Play War Thunder for FREE! Support my channel and get a premium aircraft, tank or ship and a three day account upgrade as a BONUS: gjn.link/RedEffectWarThunder Also available for free on PlayStation®4 and Xbox One.

@comradeweismann6947

4 жыл бұрын

Can you do a video on Arjun MK1A please ? I heard the Indians made many upgrades to the original arjun in the MK1A.

@ferrysyalim5191

4 жыл бұрын

Make a video about a T 15 HAPC. becouse i verry verry interested. The armor equivalent are simmilar to the T 14. Though they use same ERA. MALACHITE. But the armor composition that i am verry interested. Are they use the same composite armor? . Becouse the armor equivalent are verry verry simmilar. Make sense. They are ARMATA PLATFORM

@reserva120

4 жыл бұрын

I understand you're some millennial video game player acting as some sort of Tank expert, But son ,Russia is a two bit third world economy filled with Corruption an Sloth an nearly every level.. What exactly do you think Pakistan is?? Give Context of the nation an its situation an threat.. Do not act like some spoiled little brat saying " But I want this one an I want it now".. Context son Context..Cheers Allan

@extremedreams2019

4 жыл бұрын

The frontal armor data is very vague at best(The 400 and 300 im guessing its based on the Type 90 but Al Khalids armor is improved) due to lack of information being given out by HIT (Producer of Al Khalid) all that's actually known is that its modular composite Armour on top with high hardened steel plates over rolled homogeneous layers underneath. Also the assumption based on a few pictures that ERA is not fitted on hull with turret is also wrong as proven in the picture shown in the link below. ERA is fitted on both turret and hull during wartime conditions. pakmr.blogspot.com/2011/10/modernization-of-al-khalid-main-battle.html The engine was choosen for reasons such as better suitability for a relatively smaller tank as Al Khalid and ability to withstand the desert heat conditions of Thai desert and Indian Rajsitan desert. At a speed of around 74km/h its not a issue. Not much is known about it. Yes the original Al-Khalid has issues but so do most first tanks variants like Abrams M1A1 Its said that the Al-Khalid 1 is largely different (the mainstream AlKhalid variant currently) with many upgrades to protection firepower and digitizing a lot of analog components While the Al-Khalid 2 will be based on MBT-3000 according to some sources

@ferrysyalim5191

4 жыл бұрын

@@reserva120 he talk. With data. You talk with shit

RedEffect: Arjun .... Pakistani: Haha.... RedEffect: Al Khalid Indian: Haha

@xamanikia13

4 жыл бұрын

@laki rizki I wish we could all agree on that. Till then the world will only look at the drama between the two and laugh.

@malikabdullah1277

4 жыл бұрын

@laki rizki no we are not.

@akshatrana8218

4 жыл бұрын

😄😄😄😄

@arhumzia4087

4 жыл бұрын

It's still better than arjun it's gun is more powerful and has better fire control.

@akshatrana8218

4 жыл бұрын

@@arhumzia4087 no no...

I like this guy He is honest He is unbiased Nothing in the world is perfect. So there are flaws in everything Thank you for pointing out our flaws We will try to remove them

@MangoMan206

2 жыл бұрын

I also liked You Dude there are not many like You out there

tank designers: look at these fun big lego blocks! let's use them to give our tank cheeks!

@radonsider9692

4 жыл бұрын

Rammstein

@oac8717

4 жыл бұрын

What about throw all these stuff to the wall and let's see what sticks

@Hamza-fr1gj

4 жыл бұрын

Not cheeks jawlines

@lukabogdanovic4658

4 жыл бұрын

Lmao

@GunsNGames1

4 жыл бұрын

Liebe ist für alle da

Well, if your enemy has the Arjun, you must somehow match their incompetence.

@DonxEladio

4 жыл бұрын

But India have more T-90S,MS,M........than the Arjun 🙏

@user-ee3tu3zw2r

4 жыл бұрын

@@DonxEladio doesn't change the fact that Arjuns are trash

@bohica3264

4 жыл бұрын

But there's a reason why India has so many T90's 😊

@stigy069

4 жыл бұрын

@@user-ee3tu3zw2r Это не более чем дерьмо 💩💩

@stigy069

4 жыл бұрын

@@bohica3264 Yes because they cannot build good tanks on their own from scratch

I worked with the company that made the Motion Simulator for Al-Khalid and gun simulator for other Pakistani tanks for crew training back in 2008/2009. I got to speak with a lot of Army personals and all of them told me this tank is not the best in anyway. The way they wanted to use it was "shoot and scoot" tactics and defensive roles. But even in defensive roles they knew a lot of them will be lost, but because of the numbers and weight they will be easy to get to the front and then fall back behind artillery and air cover quickly. In offensive operations they would have used a mix of Ukrainian T-80UD and Al-Khalid supported by Al-Zarar and T-69 tanks. Back then they didn't see any big offensive action happening against India in the future at all. That was because they thought India and Pakistan will not have a big war where the Armour will actually be used against one another to grab territory because of nuclear threat. Which didn't work as Indian doctrine is still attacking with a lot of armor especially T-90s to spearhead the attack in heartland of Pakistan and call Pakistan's "nuclear bluff". Will Pakistan use tactical nukes to stop such advance, I hope we never have to see that, but right now that's the only thing Pakistan got as Tank on Tank Pakistan is way behind India. Maybe the latest acquisition of VT-4s might change the situation a little bit. Even in 2008 the army was not too invested in this tank. The engine is the biggest obstacle to put better armor on it. They tried getting Ukrainians to develop an Engine for the Al-Khalid 2 with at least 1500hp. That never happened so Al-Khalid 2 is delayed indefinitely and probably will never happen. They call this tank an MBT but actually it's more of a defensive and posturing tank.

@zanthebat

3 жыл бұрын

@Musa Ahmad motion simulator is basically a big box platform with insides made to match the tanks internal compartments. It's a platform that's placed on hydraulic jacks powered by motors. You can learn to drive and fire the weapon systems. The sights are linked to a 3d env and the sights have lcd screen playing the 3d env like a game. So when you go over a bump in the 3d world your platform moves, giving you the feeling of a real tank going over stuff. Gun simulator is the platform without the hydraulics. But the insides were agian made to look exactly like the tank turret. You have to go through all the processes and workflows of firing the real gun. Or else you can stall the systems inside the tank. It saves a lot of cost in training.

@omarhab3689

5 ай бұрын

I know am late but What did you think about the personal ? Did they seem will trained and knowing what they're doing or not ? Thx in advance

@kaycey7361

4 ай бұрын

​@@omarhab3689 that is a question of interest for me too.

@user-rt6jj8lj6g

2 ай бұрын

@@omarhab3689 total dumb fucks if you ask me. Unprofessional and have that holier than thou attitude just because theyre the "Men in black" but then again that's true for all of the Pakistani Army other than the AMC.

Yesterday I had some dude telling me that Germany won't use the leopard 2 anymore and won't order the leopard 2a7v instead Germany will buy the AL Khalid now because it's the best tank in the world now.

@Hamza-fr1gj

4 жыл бұрын

Lmao mate it's not true as Al Khalid is meant to be for hot areas such as Pakistan itself... And hasn't been exported much... secondly Pakistan has a ban due to nukes so I don't think Pakistan can export it

@sumanchatterjee6591

4 жыл бұрын

Thats a dumb statement.. Even for a pakistani.. Tho i believe they can say that

@MrNebelschatten

4 жыл бұрын

Hilarious - a German

@hansmeyer7225

4 жыл бұрын

I will order 1000 !!!

@567ghj_X

4 жыл бұрын

Defenately that dude is a Pakistani

The video is has some research flaws, but that is in no way the fault of the creator. There is just so little information about these tanks to make anything close to accurate. But I’ll try a little, I’ve driven these and spent quite some time around them. First of all, the protection. The numbers quoted at the start of the video are in fact pretty accurate, but only for the original Type 90-II or Al-Khalid tanks. The newer ones have considerably better protection, though I cannot quote numbers. It is not as good as western MBTs for sure, but that is expected considering it’s not a tank from a advanced nation. It is still enough to deal with a lot of what it will be fighting, plus a lower weight was a bigger requirement when it was designed due to transportation and terrain requirements. Secondly, the ERA, the Wikipedia mention about the APFSDS protection is, as stated, not true. But the question about the ERA only being on the turret is easily answered, it is taken off and installed as needed and during wartime it would in fact be installed with ERA on the hull and the turret (where possible). As for the what the ERA is, Originally it was the mark 1 as mentioned in the video. some later production models do have an indigenous one too which is probably better than the Mark 1, maybe as good as the mark 2, but I really can’t say about that so that stays there. The ERA on the turret does have to be taken off for the VARTA APS to be put on. But that probably wasn’t a consideration when the tank was originally designed. Most of the facts about the gun were correct, as for the ammunition, the best rounds it could fire are Indigenous DU rounds, and Pakistan does have the Chinese 125mm-3 model, but I don’t know if it’s the “standard” ammo the army carries. The rest about the thermal systems, commander not having thermals is correct. Next is mobility, for the original model of this tank, the engine, as underpowered as it is now, was pretty decent since the tank is much smaller and lighter as compared to something like an abrams or an Arjun, but the newer models (The Type 90II and the Al-Khalid “original” are pretty similar. Then there was the Al-Khalid-1, an upgraded variant. Whose basic specs are also available on Wikipedia so I won’t type them here) and the engine did start to feel underpowered for that. Though it isn’t really slow…or maybe I just feel that because other tanks I’ve driven were slower yet. Lastly, the Pakistani army is well aware of all these flaws and Wikipedia as well as other places have mentions of “Al-Khalid-2” (which would make it the third one). Which is indeed in development (and has been for quite a while now, but Pakistani RnD is a little slow due to a smaller budget than something like the USA). It will be fixing most of the issues with the current Gen including a bigger and newer engine, newer optics (third gen Thermals) and thermals for the commander and better protection, plus a New APS that wouldn’t require removing the ERA from the turret. However I have not heard of the gun being changed (the guns and capacity were changed from the first to the second variant.) Overall, still a pretty decent video considering how little information is available, if you have any questions, you can ask.

@saurabhn241

4 жыл бұрын

You've driven it? How?

@comradeclaus

4 жыл бұрын

I’ve been to several firepower displays and to active regiments of the Pakistani army. I’d rather not say my relation to the military here though.

@id05

4 жыл бұрын

Why is the production rate so low? Is pak having issues getting new engine from ukraine? or the chinese OEM is not providing new parts for local production?

@comradeclaus

4 жыл бұрын

id05 id05 id05 id05 the production rate in the past has been As per requirements and Hasn’t been slow at all. You can find production numbers in sources from interviews. The production numbers for the last 1-2 years however have been slow due to the development of the next Al-Khalid, the Al-Khalid-2, plus they’ve been upgrading the older AKs to the newer AK-1 standard. AK-2 R&D has been slow. So slow in fact that the Pakistani military even tested other tanks like the VT-4, but in the end they’ve decided to stick with the AK2 program. Which should be in its final stages by now, what’s holding it back, I’m unsure of at the moment. But it certainly does exist, so do prototypes of it. And it’s still under development, once it is finished production will reach maximum again and the older ones will be upgraded aswell. Funds aren’t really an issue in this regard because it’s an Indigenous project and overall costs are less than if they were bought from another country. Other than that, the military is upgrading its T80UD tanks to the Newer T84 OPLOT standards and is still looking for a third tank to supplement The AK-2 and the newer T84s, the current competitors seem to be more T84s themselves straight from Ukraine and T90s (if Russia allows). The VT4 was tested in Pakistan as I mentioned but it doesn’t seem to have been selected. Interest was also shown in the Turkish Atlay, but it also isn’t fully completed yet, it also seems to be too heavy to fit the Pakistani requirements, but only time will tell for now. Most of the parts for the AK are now designed and produced in Pakistan including the Gun barrels and most electronics like the BMS and the Shells, armor etc. The engine is the only major imported item. (Unlike the original AK which was a mix up from parts from all over the world.) In the Newer AK Pakistan is hoping to put an Indigenous Fire control system and APS aswell. The first has probably already been completed, the second, I’m unsure.

@aliarham6343

4 жыл бұрын

@@id05 The engine is a problem because Ukraine stop producing it so we will produce it until 2023.Imported parts aren,t a problem for us as 70 percent components are locally manufactured by pakistan others 30 percent are Avionics,engines, fire control system.

Will you cover the use of armor during the Afghan-Soviet War?

@anh413

4 жыл бұрын

Derptank yeah also some in Chechen wars too. I hear some rumors that some Russian troops put kontakt 1 on their BTR and the explosion of kontakt 1 actually help damaged the BTR

@m1a1abrams3

4 жыл бұрын

wut about me

@nks406

4 жыл бұрын

Artillery with tracks

@jamesgeorgi170

4 жыл бұрын

@@anh413 Kontakt 1 would also damage a BMP since the plates are too thin as well. I can only imagine how disastrous it was on a BTR.

@anh413

4 жыл бұрын

James Georgi yeah me too

I am from Pakistan and I agree these tanks are very old and haven't been really upgraded. With bad economy and economic sanctions they have only made tanks cheaper for basic needs on Eastern boarders

@muhamadabubkr2361

4 жыл бұрын

@MATHA NOSHTO-MAN mostly in the pockets of corrupt politicians.

@MrJoJI

4 жыл бұрын

@MATHA NOSHTO-MAN pakistan has been sanctions several times in purchasing tank engines from western country. The project is pretty old with nukes they decided to pour all the money in missiles rather than tank. Most information is unavailable due to strict secrecy and many info on era,armour is unavailable even on the rounds.

@carymnuhgibrilsamadalnasud1222

11 ай бұрын

We should buy our weapons from Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, North Korea, South Korea, Iran, Turkey, Finland, Sweden, Italy, Argentina, Brazil, Chile and probably Thailand or Norway.

I think it might be interesting to take a look at the Olifant Mk 2 or Mk 1B to see an attempt at modernizing a very old tank for the modern(ish) battlefield.

Please make a video on the Iranian made Karrar Tank. Edit: For the people with CIA and Israeli talking points in my comments that think Iranians can't produce good weaponry, let me remind them that according to the Pentagon, Iran's missiles in the middle east are unmatched in their quality and quantity in that region. You're mad if you think a successful country like Iran that has been a headache for a superpower like the U.S for 40 years can't produce good weaponry you absolute tools. It was Iran that brought down the most expensive and the biggest U.S drone in history couple of months ago in the Persian Gulf with their own Iranian made air to air missile. lets get real. Maybe the tank is horrible, I just want RedEffect, who I find reliable and trustworthy to make a video on it.

@edwardtheblackprince2722

4 жыл бұрын

@Vladimir Putin oh wow you must be a genius reading the wiki page on it. Since you read Wikipedia, should've at least mentioned that it has borrowed features from American and British tanks. I am quite curious on how good the tank is, let the man make a good video on this tank if you have no better suggestion.

@edwardtheblackprince2722

4 жыл бұрын

@Vladimir Putin This is not a request, but a humble suggestion. Who are you anyways, his dog or secretary?

@tomnguyen9159

4 жыл бұрын

What about Zulfiqar tank

@reserva120

4 жыл бұрын

@@edwardtheblackprince2722 you would have to be rather stupid an very lazy to think I ran built anything close to a real tank.. Same guys who made their stealth fighter jet.. or their New attack helicopter.. Think next time..

@reserva120

4 жыл бұрын

@Revolutionary Social-Nationalist please tell you are so stupid as to think its a real airplane of any kind??..( sorry if the dry got loss in translation:).

Red effect: problems with al-khalid tank Indians right now: LOL

@thelieutenant7732

4 жыл бұрын

They won’t say Lol when they see the video on the Arjun

@sumanchatterjee6591

4 жыл бұрын

Not really.. A weapons ultimate test happens in battlefield..

@sumanchatterjee6591

4 жыл бұрын

@@thelieutenant7732 and surely he is right.. Isn’t it? 😂😂😂

@yuvrajsingh-dh6hv

4 жыл бұрын

@@thelieutenant7732 sure let's compare a tank which is jointly produced by Copy master china to the first tank produced by India on its own

@SoumendraBagh

4 жыл бұрын

@syed musa Somewhat comparable? You are welcome to see the Chinese tank's rolling wheel in a World Tank Competition. Shit is shit.

A very reasonable analysis. This the reason why Pakistan is replacing these with more modern Chinese tanks. Back in the day the idea was to have a decent tank with better fcs and sights.

Pakistani subscriber here. I totally agree with what you said.

Thank you for pointing out weaknesses of Al-Khalid, I was thinking the same.

@arhumzia4087

4 жыл бұрын

The AL Khalid was made for desert combat but these problems should be fixed in AL Khalid 2 hopefully.

@arhumzia4087

3 жыл бұрын

@ฉันชื่อ Mustaqim haha is jf 17 scrap is latest Al Khalid 1 with 3rd generation segam thermal sights, digital panels and improved gun scrap.

@arhumzia4087

3 жыл бұрын

@ฉันชื่อ Mustaqim no we'll make ourselves and west and Russia are unreliable.

@arhumzia4087

3 жыл бұрын

@ฉันชื่อ Mustaqim so china makes good weapons and Pakistan just changes them to suit it's own needs

@huzaifanaeem835

3 жыл бұрын

@@arhumzia4087 nope. Pakistan and China made together this tank but Pakistan spend 8 years more to suit its need. At that time China and Pakistan both need help so they agreed to work together in 19s. Like in jf 17. Pakistan took Chinese experience like technology and the other things were made by Pakistan. The percentage is 80%pakistan and 20% Chinese.

Bangladeshi here, was expecting some Arjun-level toxicity in the comments but I'm honestly surprised how level headed the comments section is.

Al-Khalid is a pretty old tank, it was developed in the 90s when China wasn't very good and enter service in like 2000. I would say it is a pretty cost effective tank for a not very wealthy country like Pakistan. In the last decade these tanks should hold up fine against India's armed forces. But these need to be replaced as they are clearly outdated and India is going to mass produce T90MS under license. Not to mention they already have quite a large number of T90s that is also being upgraded at the moment.

Would be neat if you did something about the T-55 series. Slovenia still has a few modified/ "modernized" ones called T-55S if that sounds interesting for ya

@charaderaptor

4 жыл бұрын

Pakistan updated their vintage T54/55 and 59s to Al-Zarrar tank by the turret and gun of Al-Khalid, improved powerful engine and suspension.

Thanks again for the great information you provide. Getting good information about tanks or other armor is difficult to find, however you provide great information that i cant find elsewhere. Keep it up. Your a great resource.

Could we see a review of the Ajeya (t-72) and AL Zarrar tanks while we're at it

Pakistan now has VT 4

China copy weapons from USA and Russia but Pakistan copy weapons from China😓 Edit: but don't forgot that Love mark on tank

@rajatdani619

4 жыл бұрын

😆😆👏👏... Actually... China is world's biggest copy cat... And Pakistan just copies copied tank...its that much complecated...

@mac2857

4 жыл бұрын

That's a 5 xd

@peekaboopeekaboo1165

4 жыл бұрын

RedEffect is probly getting paid to spread misinfo on Al Khalid by Rus Tank mfg.

@saudjan9358

4 жыл бұрын

That is 5 in Urdu & Arabic.

@HamzaMalik-sq8fh

4 жыл бұрын

@@rajatdani619 endia ki band phr b kr dyty hn tmhari bollywood ni jo Hollywood ka chapa lgaty 😂 😂

Will you cover the romanian TR-85M1 Bison?

@andreil7627

4 жыл бұрын

That one is so old it is basically a very upgraded t55 ,so pretty ancient

@andreivladescu7178

4 жыл бұрын

@@andreil7627 it is based on the t55, yes, but it is upgraded and modernized. Why wouldn't it be a candidate for a video if it was patented in 1985?

@mputilin

4 жыл бұрын

Or Egyptian Ramses II

@andreil7627

4 жыл бұрын

because modern tanks nowadays are not based on 60 years old models,that is why. They are either new concepts or based upon newer tanks like the t80 for example

@andreivladescu7178

4 жыл бұрын

Andreas Leonhardt why then the leopard 1 is still in service? I'm sure it's not the only tank designed in the 1960s and still in service today. The point is that if the design is good why throw it? It s foolish to disregard a tank which is intended as a low to medium budget. You don't need top tier tanks to fight against lower ones. Romania was guaranteed at that time by the Warsaw pact, so the soviets had the upper hand in the alliance.

RedEffect! You highlighted that Al Khalid mobility is very bad as its engine will not accelerate but please check your sources as credible sources have mentioned Al Khalid's acceleration as 0-32 km/h in 10s which is compatible to that of even Abrams.

Doesn't have to be good, just better than the Arjun.

@aliarham6343

4 жыл бұрын

@Rashid khan Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and Benazir Bhutto Shia Muslim.Mamnoon Hussain,Asif zardari and Yahya khan are Shia Muslim.

@aliarham6343

4 жыл бұрын

@Rana Ali Akhtar Alam Khan I Don,t think MR red effect will gonna reply you.

Thank you for the video. I hope they improve it. Once again, thank you for video.

I think it’s good that the Pakistanis are building there own tanks, it shows there trying to innovate, all though objectively bad it is a important stepping stone for developing

@blackflagsofpakistantheeas9109

4 жыл бұрын

Babes, this is 90's tank. We are working on a new one since years now

For a second I read Al-Khalifa :v

@DESIBOY-fe7nm

4 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂😂😝😝😝 Then it would have been my favourite tank.!!!!!

@parikshitverma2897

4 жыл бұрын

MiAl Khalifa

The specs you are using is for the first Al-Khalid variant made in the 1990s. An overwhelming majority of those have been converted to Al-Khalid I, a significantly upgraded variant. This MBT is in use with 8 different countries throughout the world.

Hey man thanks for listening to my comment and just one more thing can you make a video on al Zarrar

Cheers Redeffect! Love what you're doing. I believe you made a mistake saying the mg is remotely operated. In most other tanks it big and bulky but in this tank it looks like it's just the mg. I don't know if you'll see this but if you do, thanks.

It is not good as modern tanks. But fulfils is role and is better than tanks manufactured in region. It can fire uranium depleted shells which are combat proven and can pretty much damage any tank. It will soon upgrade with new engine, gun, Thermal site for commander

4:54 the Chinese datasheet says the APFSDS round penetrates 220mm of RHA at a 68.5-degree angle, doesn't say the range though

@azrael9016

4 жыл бұрын

At the end it says "At ranges >2000..." which is probably meters so it says 2000m :)

@kevinyang5926

4 жыл бұрын

Azrael I was about to say as 220mm is abysmally poor

@azrael9016

4 жыл бұрын

@@kevinyang5926 that is 220mm penetration on the armor that is slopped at 68 degrees. Which is not that bad, according to some other sources, like "Jane's Armor and Artillery" on 0 degrees the projectile has 600mm penetration, which again is not that bad but still not that good either.

@comradeclaus

4 жыл бұрын

The Pakistanis do have the newer Chinese 125-3 rounds. Plus Indigenous DU rounds with greater penetration. The 125-3s, I don’t know if they’re the standard rounds the army carries or the older 2s, but the DU is definitely present is large numbers.

@azrael9016

4 жыл бұрын

@@comradeclaus They have their Nazia DU rounds that have worse penetration than 125-II rounds. They have 550mm on 2km compared to 600mm of 125-II. And what is your source that Pakistan has 125-III?

Sell it to Blizzard Entertainment, they’ll take anything Originally Chinese

@blackflagsofpakistantheeas9109

4 жыл бұрын

Originally Chinese? Nope dude We Pakistanis make and develop our own. We aren't Indians who will have a stock of worthless Western Arms. We are Aryans, we know more about war than Whole south Asia combined

@sincereeastman6972

4 жыл бұрын

Black Flags of Pakistan the East I quote “The Al-Khalid is a main battle tank jointly developed by Pakistan and China during the 1990s, based on the Chinese Type 90-IIM tank.” So your cutting out China helped develop your MBT so technically it’s Chinese since it was based off the Type 90-IIM

@justinh6651

4 жыл бұрын

@Rana Ali Akhtar Alam Khan actually it uses chinese projectiles

@arhumzia4087

4 жыл бұрын

@@sincereeastman6972 what about you all your so called fully Indian weapons are filled with Israeli equipment and based on American equipment.

@josephphilister6069

3 жыл бұрын

@@blackflagsofpakistantheeas9109 you are not aryans,you are brown

In peacetime no need to cover all tank in ERA blocks. ERA can be bolted on easily if need be. The shotra display was for test purposes.

Play War Thunder! It's free and really fun!

@wonkagaming8750

4 жыл бұрын

Till you come up againt higher BR

@Noisykiller12

4 жыл бұрын

it starts fun then you get to top tier hell

@wonkagaming8750

4 жыл бұрын

@@Noisykiller12 one word *APFSDS BOUNCE*

@scheisseaufpasswort

4 жыл бұрын

and super grindy and you buy a tank and it gets uptiered and becomes useless.AWESOME

@wonkagaming8750

4 жыл бұрын

@@scheisseaufpasswort my man

5:57 that was satisfying

Can your please do comparison of al khalid vs arjun

Thank you RedEffect!! You just uploaded my desired Video.

i love your analysis RedEffect

Much of Pakistan’s weapon philosophy revolves around make it cheap, produce whatever you can in the country, make it okayish, but make sure we always have spares. Nonetheless it sure can take on Indian T72’s. Need a new tank for the T90s though

I would like to add some information regarding Al Khalid... the tank you talked about in here is of old block 2 characteristics... production of block 2 is closed since 2017 and Block 3 has been started with more upgrades... And it's a 3rd gen tank in Pakistan Army and is quite old... And let's not forget it is Modification of Chinesse tank MBT2000 if I am not wrong... which was modified to Pakistan needs and then has been produced and upgraded by HIT... And lastly Pakistan is working on Al Haider tank which is future MBT...

@hamadtoseef3953

4 жыл бұрын

Hopefully it has better protection and firepower

@hamadtoseef3953

4 жыл бұрын

I think al khalid may be behind modern tanks but it is already better than arjun mbt

@hamadtoseef3953

4 жыл бұрын

@Rana Ali Akhtar Alam Khan what do u mean?

@hamadtoseef3953

4 жыл бұрын

@Rana Ali Akhtar Alam Khan if ur right u just changed my whole view on al Khalid

@hamadtoseef3953

4 жыл бұрын

@Rana Ali Akhtar Alam Khan but still the armor needs to be improved more

Good video but theres an error about the CITV. You see on some photos of alkhalid tank this tank HAS CITV but on some other models CITV was not installed just with an placeholder near the 12.7 machine gun.

I find it funny just recently, 3 years down the line, war thunder adds the tank to the game

Well, we can all agree, it is better than the mighty Arjun.Untill 2020, when India will finally become a superpower.

@zerotwo_.002

4 жыл бұрын

Many of the problems with Arjun were fixed in mk1a also many information given by the this channel were based if cgi meant for the showcase of the tank not a scale built schematic

@comradeclaus

4 жыл бұрын

Not really. The newer variants of the Arjun are still pretty bad. The problems were fixed with the requirements of the armed forces in mind, but were fixed so slow that by the time it was fixed, the tank was outdated yet again.

@goblincleaver_mshm.9751

4 жыл бұрын

India a superpower lol ....look at there situation right now

@Vlad_-_-_

4 жыл бұрын

@@goblincleaver_mshm.9751 Mate, can you not realise I was being sarcastic ? Did you really took what I said literally ? India superpower by 2020 is a meme.

@Vlad_-_-_

4 жыл бұрын

@@comradeclaus Does it still fire the MK I apfsds with less pen than the L7 apfsds rounds ?

Video starts at 0:57

Thanks Red effect I'm waiting for that epsiod you fullfill my dream

5:40 I’m not a mechanical engineer but can’t the transmission off set the torque problem?

Your saying they should tell classified information online?

@saminyead1233

3 жыл бұрын

What kind of rounds a tank can fire is not classified information. You can find this info for the Abrams too. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

@shehzad330

3 жыл бұрын

@@saminyead1233 what I am saying and what you're saying. You will not found what kind round USMC is using in their Tank and even correct size of bullet. E:G .57 or 12.7 used by USMC can travel twice the distance then regular EU standard. This thing got notice by a Canadian Sniper in Afghanistan.

Thank you for pointing out the flaws for improvement before they are sent out to deal with Arjuna tank

Can you make videos about modern "Medium"/Light tanks in the market today like the Harimau, K21-105 and the contender for the US army LT-105 /ASCODII MMBT Whats with the sudden emergence of these kinds of vehicles

@radenprasetyo8234

3 жыл бұрын

"what inspired you to bring medium tank back to earth " Money I mean for harimau it's kinda cheap (not cheap enough for a dude with minimal wages to buy) and it was designed to support a country with numerous island and poor infrastructure like Indonesia and Philippines since it's was lighter than most MBT It maybe don't offered a lot of protection it does have an okay firepower for it's job Matsimus once post a video about it but now the video is gone

the engine is good because the tanks weight is 46 tons and could reach the speed of 70 kph.

@giorgiogalliano05

3 жыл бұрын

Top speed doesn’t mean nothing if the tank doesn’t have torque

@aliarham6343

3 жыл бұрын

@@giorgiogalliano05 the same engine is on oplot M of ukrain. The weight of both tanks is roughly 48 tons and torque of 3200 is descent for that tank

@aliarham6343

3 жыл бұрын

@@giorgiogalliano05 even with less torque, that does not effect the mobility, not as good as the T90 but still good.Power to weight ratio is 26 HP/ton which is excellent in the world and the best in medium weight tank category

@giorgiogalliano05

3 жыл бұрын

@@aliarham6343 i didn’t now that thanks

@aliarham6343

3 жыл бұрын

@@giorgiogalliano05 And more torque means you can carry more weight. More Horsepower means tank have good hull and turret turn rate and good speed

Could you do a video on the polish PT-91 and the improved PT-91M variant?

Al Khalid tank is Best tank ....made for target practice by other tanks especially Arjun !!

Got a question is the Karrar just a copy of a T-90?

@lukabogdanovic4658

4 жыл бұрын

Yes

@raymondgalvan459

4 жыл бұрын

@Revolutionary Social-Nationalist oh in that case mind telling me about the karrar it would be a pleasure.

@patriotenfield3276

4 жыл бұрын

Not that so

@VladislavDrac

4 жыл бұрын

It might look cosmetically identical, but I think they still differ in terms of armament, FCS, engine, etc. Idk tho. I hope RedEffect makes a video about it, as well as other Iranian tanks that some of us are suggesting.

@xAlexTobiasxB

4 жыл бұрын

@@VladislavDrac If you watch the videos about Karrar, you will notice that it doesn't even have a stabilized gun, since it wiggles up and down (not szabilized) which means it can not accurately hit while movign as the gun moves . The "thermal sight" looks also very fake...

Protection isn't that good I know but alkhalid 1 is a great upgrade they got rid of analogue systems and replaced it with digitals

@goblincleaver_mshm.9751

4 жыл бұрын

@Rana Ali Akhtar Alam Khan I know I read about it

@goblincleaver_mshm.9751

4 жыл бұрын

@Rana Ali Akhtar Alam Khan can you send me mk1,s testing

First India and now Pakistan..i am sure......this channel is gonna gain a lot of Popularity in the upcoming days 😂😂😂😈😈😇...

CITV has installed in the “commander variant” it seems

Fair enough analysis. The engine was chosen mainly because it could cope with the summer heat in Pakistan. The British and Chinese engines tested failed completely. The Ukrainian engine was the only one that worked fine, and is the same or similar to that in the T-80UD, which is Pakistan's best protected tank at least. The power to weight ratio isn't too bad, but they've been looking for a 1,500hp engine for years and look like they're going for another Ukrainian one as those seem to be the only ones that can manage the heat. The protection isn't anything as good as it should be, but the composite armour is modular and was always intended to be replaced with more modern types as and when they became available. The Varta isn't fitted operationally (I think it was mainly being trialed for an upgraded variant, but never adopted), whereas additional ERA is. The images that show the maximum number of ERA plates like the VT-1 is the operational ERA plate layout (though even that needs to improve). In peacetime they leave most ERA plates off. They're looking for a new third generation TI sight. I can't say much about the ammo, but it was mainly intended to be able to cope with the T-72M1, which it can do perfectly fine. At the time it was designed the T-72M1 was considered the only tank it was likely to come up against. If that other APFSD round has been acquired (it probably has), that was done so to improve firepower against the T-90. At the end of the day, the AK had to be better than the T-72M1, which it clearly is. It also hasn't been upgraded since it entered service. It can hold its own on a South Asian battlefield, there's nothing really bad about it that can't be fixed, and it should be around for a while even if Pakistan is now interested in the Chinese VT-4.

@comradeclaus

4 жыл бұрын

The VARTA is optional, most units opt for the added ERA instead since VARTA is getting a little old now. They’re also looking for a newer APS to put on it for the next Generation. The Pakistani army does have the 125-3 Chinese rounds but I don’t know if they’re the standard round these tanks Carry or if it’s the older 2. The 1500HP engine, third gen thermals and a thermal for the commander plus better protection are all supposed to be a part of the Next upgrade but RND is slow because of budget constraints (though it should be close to done by now). Pakistan did trial the VT-4 tank but it did not place any orders or show further interest. It is currently showing more interest towards The newer T84s (and hopefully upgrading its UDs aswell) and maybe even T90s if Russia allows it.

@mikhailzavarov4958

4 жыл бұрын

This is better writing than the videos 😂

@blackflagsofpakistantheeas9109

4 жыл бұрын

@@mikhailzavarov4958 true

@gwshd-6344

3 жыл бұрын

@@comradeclaus well I guess it came as a shock when Pakistan revealed the vt4s last week

tank experts in the comments

my sources say that hull is 450mm on hull and 650-700 so WTF.Al Khalid Turret: 645 Glacis: 435-455 Turret: 1060 (1160 w/ERA) Glacis: 540 (670w/ERA)

@radenprasetyo8234

3 жыл бұрын

The only link that you put in your comment is WTF.AI which doesn't really work could you put the actual source

@arhumzia6360

3 жыл бұрын

@@radenprasetyo8234 google tank protection levels worldwar.net

@arhumzia6360

3 жыл бұрын

@@radenprasetyo8234 idk why everyone makes video about AL khalid not Al khalid 1 the upgraded version.

@radenprasetyo8234

3 жыл бұрын

@@arhumzia6360 maybe because your country didn't leak much information that let people know that al-khaled 1 actually exist, even if someone does it's gonna be vague and not convincing heck even misleading

@arhumzia6360

3 жыл бұрын

@@radenprasetyo8234 AL Khalid has a lot of sources google it.

Could you do a vídeo about the Leopard A1A5 plz? Love ur vids btw

Please do about The Romanian copy of T55 tank

@ionutbalta6607

4 жыл бұрын

It's not that good of a tank.It needs to be replaced ASAP.

@notbasilcount1059

4 жыл бұрын

@@ionutbalta6607 seething

@ionutbalta6607

4 жыл бұрын

@@notbasilcount1059 How am I seething?Its a known fact that even the latest TR-85 Bizon model is already past its prime and romanian goverment looks to replace them.Most likely with Leopards 2.

@leomarin2205

4 жыл бұрын

is not a copy . .and for stupid kids ,espacial romanian one , thay are not replace with the LEO2 ..

@ionutbalta6607

4 жыл бұрын

@@leomarin2205 Theres current talks about it.Theres nothing yet confirmed but there are discussions about it.

Problems with Challenger 2 or T-90MS?

@ferrysyalim5191

4 жыл бұрын

Appearantly T 90MS or chalanger 2 does not have any problems at all. They both are really really good tanks. Bro are u good???

@icetea8946

4 жыл бұрын

@@ferrysyalim5191 I know they're good. But no tank is perfect. Are u good?

@ferrysyalim5191

4 жыл бұрын

@@icetea8946 yeah. I am good. Thanks for asking dude. But NATO or US fanboys are saying NATO TANKS ARE PERFECT !!! SPECIALY M1 ABRAMS! UNBEATABLE!!!. I met you. And you are saying. "no tanks is perfect" . 👏👏👏 iam suprized.

@s.31.l50

4 жыл бұрын

Ferry Syalim that is certainly not true. The Challenger II is slower then it’s contemporary MBTs due to its weight and weak engine, and it’s rifled gun is somewhat outdated when compared to guns like the Rheinmetal 120mm L/55.

@ancientwarrior3482

4 жыл бұрын

@@ferrysyalim5191 Challenger 2 has trash top speed

*_You smart. You loyal._*

Al khalid is an international student from china current studying in pakistan.

NO tank is safe from modern rockets... also logistics, I think it is for defence only not offensive

Imagine if Arjun tank "climbs" Khalid tank. 😀 (Kursk Reference) Khalid is *DOOMED.*

@blackflagsofpakistantheeas9109

4 жыл бұрын

By the time it would reach near Al khalid it would be blown to pieces considering its way too heavy and slow

@mukulmehra007

4 жыл бұрын

@@blackflagsofpakistantheeas9109 Arjun is Ferrari of Desert... Tho it's pretty much an easy kill in MOUNTAINOUS REGION, but with or without RHA Arjun can easily take 4-5 APFSDS due to its ultra thicc KANCHAN ARMOUR...

@mukulmehra007

4 жыл бұрын

@Mansoor Ahmed tanks aint 'SNIPERS' who can snipe that 1 square feet vulnerable point in Turret... Apart from that Arjun is desert fortress... Also is almost impossible to target that 'small' 1 sq feet point in a Moving tank at 65 KMPH in desert... combined with its speed in Desert and advanced gyroscopic turret stabilizer and FCS, it can kill any target 2 KM away even while running at full speed... Btw i agree, in mountain areas its an easy prey...

@mukulmehra007

4 жыл бұрын

Btw there's no point of debating when there's less than 100 operational Arjun out of, 2000 T90 MS and T72S...

@mukulmehra007

4 жыл бұрын

@Mansoor Ahmed i agree about awacs and cyber warfare... But recent steps have been taken and few Airbus are bought by IAF for new DRDO 360 coverage AWACS.. Also the Cyber Defence (also offence) agency is created by current govt this year (should be operational by 2020), given that India has immense manpower for Cyber applications (almost all of them works abroad) and if they are put into work with this agency I'm sure India would progress very fast in this department too...

This is basic export version, the al Khalid used and made for Pakistan army is a state of art highly upgraded and advance future machine, kept secret from the world , That will only show its superiority, armor protection & fire power on battle ground.

@RahulYadav-uv8fz

4 жыл бұрын

Brother why are you people buying T55s?

@Silverhawks101

4 жыл бұрын

Rahul Yadav why are you buying Rafayal

The design looks antiquated 😯

i think comparing Al Khalid tank to Arjun is a more fair comparison dont you agree ? and in that regards its actually pretty good.

@RanjitKumar-pr2eq

4 жыл бұрын

Stupid are u a mechanical engineer ? S Al-Khalid a Chinese toy will be crushed by arjun

@aliarham6343

4 жыл бұрын

@@RanjitKumar-pr2eq in what ways?

Al khalid is a chinese copy of T-72 variant... That's all..No comparison with new T-90 tank..

@Bramhos289

4 жыл бұрын

@Salman Sadiq T-90 failed... lol..😆😆😆🤣what we can expect from Madrasachap Pakistani...T-90 survived Tow hit..go & watch this clip...Thats why Pakistan army wanted to buy T-90 tanks but they hv no money...so they continued to buy cheap,junky al khalid tanks..beggars 😂🤣😆 kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZKaa28eLXbzHeto.html

@stech32m

4 жыл бұрын

@@Bramhos289 stupid it's their own tank .

@Bramhos289

4 жыл бұрын

@@stech32m Dumb...Al khalid is a cheap chinese tank Assembled in Pakistan.😂🤣.. where as Arjun is made in india..

@stech32m

4 жыл бұрын

@@Bramhos289 Al Khalid tank is also Pakistani . Jf 17 was assemble in Pakistan and promoted by abhilandan . after abhilandan many countries are buying jf17 and no one want to use randistani samosa jets that takes more than 50 years but still under progress. 😂😂😂😂😂😂 Al Khalid tank is totally made in Pakistan now Pak is also updating it . Search on KZread about jf 17 every one is praising it where is your samosa jets your army totally depends on Russia France and America

@mraza2770

4 жыл бұрын

@@Bramhos289 Made in india always comes with tons of bullshit ideal example is lca tejas and your arjun btw if arjun is good enough and much better than T-90 according to many indians so why you guys order more T90's even you have a good option such as arjun mk2 and it's your own ? i suggest you please stop living in a foolish pardise and grow up !

Red..can you please do a video about pt91 tank from poland..cant see any pt91 tank in your channel..thanks

Even though you did a great job on this video I still wanted to say that I don't think it's complete and I have searched on the internet about the Al Khalid but I didn't find much Info

Is it bad? Yes. OK...next video XD

@argaming3070

3 жыл бұрын

Tell me a tank better produced by your country Norway? You dont have shit:) Also it is recognized as among the best tanks in the world. So Nobody cares what you think. Especially since you come from a country with a shit military. Pakistan would wipe the floor with norway in a war.

This is nothing but a cheap copy of Chinese Type 90-IIM tank.

Al Khalid 1 is the upgraded version of the tank if possible do a review on that

Well this tank is good with speed of 70kmph with night and auto loader at least explosive reactive armor is mounted now on all weak spots.

@mercedesbenz3751

4 жыл бұрын

useless if you are still crying for Kashmir at the UN.

Make a video T 14 ARMATA VS M1A3. That willbe comparable than T 14 VS M1A2 SEP V 3.

Still better than the Arjun MBT

@animeshkantibiswas4155

2 жыл бұрын

Only in ur wet dreams

@sabinayasmin7039

2 жыл бұрын

@@animeshkantibiswas4155 lol shut up!

@sabinayasmin7039

2 жыл бұрын

Arjun is worse than Bob semple

@dot1108

2 жыл бұрын

@@animeshkantibiswas4155 Arjun is a big failure bro

@animeshkantibiswas4155

2 жыл бұрын

@@dot1108 lol says who the only down sides are the weight ( though its weight is just similar to Leo 2 and Abrams ) and gun ( being rifled ) except that it has everything that a 3rd gen tank needs and even it's getting a DRDO developed APS which also includes IR disrupter and also being tested with indigenous 1500hp engine. Arjun is among the good performance tanks if not among the best. Also u are to understand it's a homework for Indian tank building it's done to get experience. Just wait for the FMBT. Though I thing IQ failures like u guys will ever understand this.

i dont understand why all these third world countries dont just mass produce Toyota Hilux's with long barreled 152mm guns on them. for war thunder players think object 120 gun

and also this tank was created in 1993 For that time this tank is a beast armored machine

we bangladeshis also use dis tank

@radenprasetyo8234

3 жыл бұрын

Seriously? I thought you guys are enemy

@mayazmahmud1740

3 жыл бұрын

@@radenprasetyo8234 were

@radenprasetyo8234

3 жыл бұрын

@@mayazmahmud1740 so you guys are friend or foe

@radenprasetyo8234

3 жыл бұрын

@@mayazmahmud1740 or a frienemy

@radenprasetyo8234

3 жыл бұрын

@@mayazmahmud1740 a tsundere of a Nation

better than Indian's homemade tank, but worse than t-90

@Leo73srb

4 жыл бұрын

joke

@TheTeKuZa

4 жыл бұрын

really funny

@MS-jb2fe

4 жыл бұрын

Really???

@pratikgupta8899

4 жыл бұрын

Arjun tank is more superior thane this junk go and check drdo website about arjun tank and arjun mk1a is next generation tank and mk2 is under development

@tandemcharge5114

4 жыл бұрын

@@pratikgupta8899 Idk, the Al Khalid doesn't have a huge literal hole of a weakspot like the Arjun

some corrections the pictures u showed r of the prototype and not the production model.second it uses DU apfsds as well as tungsten alloy which is said to have 700mm at 0 degree most things with this machine r classified as of now cos AK2 is to be revealed soon which is said to be having a leopard style turrent,the tank is as good as t90

The number one problem with this tank is that's named after Khalid

Insert "i hate this tank cause its from enemy country" comments here... Btw really appreciate red effect doing reviews of not nato western tanks :-)

@Hamza-fr1gj

4 жыл бұрын

Enemy country who stood with you for years untill you ditched em

@blackflagsofpakistantheeas9109

4 жыл бұрын

@@Hamza-fr1gj I think he meant Indian comments here

567th !

What happened to the Arjun review part 2?

Red effect why don't you make a viedo on Arjun mk1a

Is it bad? Absolutely

@f1aziz

4 жыл бұрын

Unbiased opinion I bet.

@DuyNguyen-bk8mu

4 жыл бұрын

@@f1aziz did you watch the vid?

@f1aziz

4 жыл бұрын

@@DuyNguyen-bk8mu Yep.

@blackflagsofpakistantheeas9109

4 жыл бұрын

Says an Indian? Ok

@architsharma2877

4 жыл бұрын

Black Flags of Pakistan the East yes this tank is Chinese crap disposed to your chump military

Plz give ur veiws on Anjun mk 1A MBT

@aezakmi3766

4 жыл бұрын

He already did that long time ago, search it in his videos and be ready to be disappointed.

@drunkcat1713

4 жыл бұрын

@@aezakmi3766 he did on mk2 not MK1A

@aezakmi3766

4 жыл бұрын

Yes he did but mk2 over mk1 have few improvements but still has a lot of flaws and is not that combat effective.

@mukulmehra007

4 жыл бұрын

@@drunkcat1713 MK2 is in Design phase, how can he review something that's not out yet? 😂😂

@drunkcat1713

4 жыл бұрын

@@mukulmehra007 specs are available in open source... which the drdo is aiming for

Dear Sir As you stated that AK don't host Commander sight In Alkhalid Brochure it is mentioned that AK host Panoramic Bi Axis Stabilized LRF 2nd Gen IIT Commander Sight with Hunter Killer capability

@azrael9016

4 жыл бұрын

he said that commander does not have Thermal sight not that he does not have his own sight.

@azrael9016

4 жыл бұрын

@Rana Ali Akhtar Alam Khan The problem is that commander uses gunner's thermal. That is the case in many tanks and that is not same as commander having his own thermal.

have you name of song in backround because i like to listem to it when i fly my jet in war thunder custom acrobatics battles

Aah Mia Khalifa tank..

@muhammadusmanrai94924

4 жыл бұрын

whats about sunny leone tank????

@muhammadusmanrai94924

4 жыл бұрын

smj tu gye hu gy beta....

Pakistan is poor...and a new one is coming soon....love from pakistan.

@blackflagsofpakistantheeas9109

4 жыл бұрын

Yep, however have to say, Alkhalid won us the war in the North so it has done good. However we should switch to a new one

@TruthSeeker35511

4 жыл бұрын

@@blackflagsofpakistantheeas9109 which war was that ?

@tayyabgaming4759

4 жыл бұрын

@@TruthSeeker35511 I believe that he meant the Pakistani military operations against the terrorist organizations.

@Phantomtrooper22

4 жыл бұрын

@@TruthSeeker35511 it was a war against lightly armed home grown bad terrorists which don't even have any kind of anti tank weapons.

@saadkhalid6421

4 жыл бұрын

Sleepy People dont know THAT PAKISTAN is developing new kinds of tanks in video the tank he is talking abt is the previous version developed many years ago.

Please do the K2 black panther next.

Hit the jack pot. Make video about Indian T90S vs Pakistan T80UD and Al Khalid

it's going to be war in comment section 😁 , I'm definitely going to enjoy it.......first let me getting my popcorn.