- Join me in War Thunder for FREE on PC, PS®5 and Xbox Series X|S: gjn.link/RedEffectWarThunder​​​. Follow my link to get the game as well as an exclusive bonus. Thank you for supporting the channel!

@muhammadtaufiqhailkhairila2790

3 жыл бұрын

If I already played it, can i still claim the exclusive bonus?

@gigamoumantai2696

3 жыл бұрын

I think eastern tanks are the best tanks in the world.

@terraspent

3 жыл бұрын

i guess economic measure are sorely needed to be taken, hence this mess of a tank!?

@terraspent

3 жыл бұрын

@@gigamoumantai2696 and primarily russian, the chinese have made a lot of similar design but by no means inovated much more at all. to be more accurate i would say russian tanks! and russia is both part of the west and east.

@lucasboaventura100

3 жыл бұрын

Hey man, you can do some videos about or EE-T1 and T2 Osório, or Tamoyo I, II and III, or even x1a pioneiro and x1a2 carcará, and maybe EE-17 and EE-18 Sucuri tank hunters or EE-11 Hydracobra?😁 And can suggest a complete brazilian tank tree in war Thunder with vbb-1, vbb-2, crr, ee-3 jararaca, ee-t4 ogum, ee-9 cascavel magro, xlf40, an m3stuart aa brazilian version, m41C "Caxias", cbtp charrua aa version, Vbtp mr guarani torc 30, and the others above😁?

low IQ: it's a downgraded T-64, high IQ: it's a upgraded T-55

@khahinmetameta7826

3 жыл бұрын

Me: T55AM series

@dineshvasu5938

3 жыл бұрын

That true because every thing is designed with certain purpose .so design will not be applicable because the requirements would have change or does suite current requirement .this you tube will speak dumb shit will speak shit without knowing the time energy spend by some hard engineer and workers .

@xiebowen582

3 жыл бұрын

a trending chinese meme lol

@jetkwan6707

3 жыл бұрын

@@xiebowen582 Gotta love the Type 59GGGGGGG

@m10tankdestroyer94

3 жыл бұрын

So it's basically an argument wether the glass is half full or half empty

Yeah, just take a Leopard 2A7 and put a Leo 1 turret on it.

@chesterthemolester7976

3 жыл бұрын

You mean Panzer I turret?

@culturedman2757

3 жыл бұрын

Or M1 Abrams hull with M-60 turret

@kajmak64bit76

3 жыл бұрын

@@culturedman2757 or M-60 hull with abrams turret xd

@culturedman2757

3 жыл бұрын

@@kajmak64bit76 wait how about this M-60 hull with M3 Bradley turret

@doctorchaotic3415

3 жыл бұрын

@@culturedman2757 what about Bradley with BMP turret

RedEffect - "The Most Useless Tank To Ever Exist". Arjun looks on nervously 👀

@bikashnayak9311

3 жыл бұрын

Makes no sense😂😂

@JohnSmith-fd5un

3 жыл бұрын

I heard they upgraded the Arjun quite a bit. I would like to see more.

@siouneo152

3 жыл бұрын

Arjun is piece of junk, FCS of Arjuna might be somewhat good but the problem is the gun it self sucks so having a good fire control system means nothing when you have a tank that can barely penetrate anything. ( except for the Ukrainian made T55-64 tank, thanks Ukrainian for making such weird tanks so that we have a video to watch about it ) Also it's armor sucks so if you only have a RPG and was told you make sure the Arjuna doesn't break your lines than you are in for a tank slaughter.

@SyedIrtiza1

3 жыл бұрын

LMAO

@daxie__3210

3 жыл бұрын

@@bikashnayak9311 yeah the arjun makes no sense

Meanwhile the people at Gaijin: *sees potential 8.0 BR premium

@SirenHead00

3 жыл бұрын

i want it

@khahinmetameta7826

3 жыл бұрын

Everyone else easy target

@Dan86130

2 жыл бұрын

I mean, the premium ZTZ-59 is 8.0

RedEffect: "The Most Useless Tank to EVER Exist" TR-85M1: "Are you challenging me ?"

@ahmadariqdarwish2042

3 жыл бұрын

Its useless because ukrainian have other good tank, Romanian only have TR-85

@dabelli3818

3 жыл бұрын

Well, at least the TR85M is an upgrade over the original tank, this is a literal downgrade. At least the Romanians tried to upgrade it, the Ukrainians just plain out removed every advantage it could have had before.

@primuspilusfellatus6501

3 жыл бұрын

The existence of the TR85M is atleast justifiable, considering that it is a very cheap alternative to modern MBT's, but this tank, why did they create this tank? They made a glorified T54 tank whilst wasting a whole T 64B Hull

@ahmadariqdarwish2042

3 жыл бұрын

@@dabelli3818 lmao, Ulkraine have better tank, one of them is T-84Oplot and T-64E

@dabelli3818

3 жыл бұрын

@@ahmadariqdarwish2042 I know man, that's another reason why this tank is more useless than the TR85M The Oplot I don't know how many were made, since they had some serious economic problems, and they couldn't deliver tanks even to foreign buyers. But they may have solved, I don't know

"most useless tank" african t55 with bmp1 turret: i`am a joke to you?

@teslashark

3 жыл бұрын

At least you can launch ATGM

@dandondera2618

3 жыл бұрын

Does such a thing even exist??!!???

@weaponisedikeakite800

3 жыл бұрын

@@dandondera2618 Yes just google “t55 with bmp1 turret”

@weaponisedikeakite800

3 жыл бұрын

Also it’s not African but Kurdish

@dandondera2618

3 жыл бұрын

@@weaponisedikeakite800 Holly Molly, I just did :(

Ukraine : hey africa you want T55 on T64 hull African nation : nah I would rather stick with T55 with ERA instead , we maybe poor but not stupid

@kriysixvector4552

3 жыл бұрын

Ditto.

@thekaiseroftheeast3895

3 жыл бұрын

Lol, even North Korea could sell their artillery to Iraq. Idk how Ukraine botched this one up so badly.

@user-fx9rw7xc1e

3 жыл бұрын

@@thekaiseroftheeast3895 Why do you assume DPRK artillery is bad?

@thekaiseroftheeast3895

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-fx9rw7xc1e I don't, but it's a lot more outdated than modern artillery.

@ggurwlcom420

3 жыл бұрын

@@thekaiseroftheeast3895 the only difference with modern artillery units is their carriage systems and digital fire control+target acquisition. The gun and its basic ballistic characteristic itself is still the same back into cold war era.

‘Useless’? Well in that case I’ll be happy to take it

@cosmin_budda

3 жыл бұрын

Lmao me 2

@TheKaMeLRo

3 жыл бұрын

yeah for my garden decoration.

@bikashnayak9311

3 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

@hasselnttper3730

3 жыл бұрын

No, I'll take it.

@SirenHead00

3 жыл бұрын

give it to the police :)

I've just read few articles about this tank a few days ago, in Ukrainian (I'm Ukrainian). useless or not, but Kharkiv plant has an abundance of rusty T-64 hulls that were brought from the DDR in the 90s, and this "modification" or "hybrid" was a proposal to sell them for cheap to countries that operate T-55 and have a lot of 100mm ammunition stored but wanted something "better". So instead of letting them rust or scrap them, they decided to earn some money and I don't think it's a bad idea. Is it the most useless tank ever? Maybe, if you are fighting a potent enemy, but if you are fighting some dudes with jeeps and RPGs probably not. Should it be used in modern combat or in the Ukrainian army? BIG NO. Can it be useful for some poor countries like Somalia or Zimbabwe? I think so. Were the designers drunk or something like that when designing this tank? Definitely not. In fact, they were smart but misunderstood.

@AP-ec8os

2 жыл бұрын

How are you doing nowadays?

@blankspace998

2 жыл бұрын

@@AP-ec8osHello, thanks for asking. Well, obviously we are doing worse than a year ago when I wrote my comment. But definitely better than Russian propaganda TV or other media sources say. Overall we are being positive and firm in our belief to win this war.

@AP-ec8os

2 жыл бұрын

@@blankspace998 which city are you in?

@megaliidea1919

2 жыл бұрын

It's been a month how about now? Why did East Germany have t64 hulls?

@icantthinkofausername2605

2 жыл бұрын

@@megaliidea1919 why wouldn't a soviet area contain soviet vehicles?

Next up. . .The new Abrams chassis with 90mm armed M48 turret!

@ReviveHF

3 жыл бұрын

Republic of China has a tank that combines the M60 Hull with M48 turret. On the other hand, People's Republic of China also have the Type 85 turret mounted on type59 Hull.

@csme07

3 жыл бұрын

@@ReviveHF no I’m not believing that

@mathiasbartl903

2 жыл бұрын

@@csme07 The difference in armour for both tanks is irrelevant against modern weapons, and both can mount the same gun and equipment.

@swaghauler8334

2 жыл бұрын

@Reinhard Heydrich M60-2000.

@85Bad4ever

Жыл бұрын

i would love to see that :)

Red Effect: this tank might be the most useless tank to ever exist! Arjunk: I'm going to ruin this man's entire career...

@SyedIrtiza1

3 жыл бұрын

LOL

@91plm

3 жыл бұрын

@Shubhabrata banerjee *I shoot at Arjunk and miss* Arjunk: don't worry i've always been useless! :(

@shashanksekuri7231

3 жыл бұрын

@Shubhabrata banerjee lol stupid tank arjun cant even PEN most mbt

@indiangrunt

3 жыл бұрын

Oh really why don't search for cag report how Arjunmk1A outclassed T90 other than weight

@Ahmed_Hasan_

3 жыл бұрын

Wow even the Arjun can make this thing Swiss cheese thats how horrible this idea is

ah yes, do a review of t34-62 after this one pls

@Tonyx.yt.

3 жыл бұрын

what about a t34-125?

@AlreadyTakenTag

3 жыл бұрын

How about a T34 with a 203mm B-4 howitzer in the turret?

@LockheedC-130HerculesOfficial

3 жыл бұрын

what about the [REDACTED]

@re57k

3 жыл бұрын

what

@Andy-P

3 жыл бұрын

This retro ukrainian tank stuff is so amusing. Must be the fashion there? no doubt some one is making money... They will be reforming cavalry units next...

*Arjun:* _Finally a worthy opponent, our battle will be legendary!_ Who would win do you think?

@ikill-98

3 жыл бұрын

In that case both TR85 and arjun can beat this tank

@A_Nice_Guy.

3 жыл бұрын

I hate arjun from the bottom of my heart but arjun will blow this thing to smithereens

@eustache_dauger

3 жыл бұрын

The inflatable Shermans of the Ghost Army of WW2 is still better than Arjun tbh

@A_Nice_Guy.

3 жыл бұрын

@@eustache_dauger yeah, but at least arjun has an actual fcs with thermals unlike this PoS

@HanSolo__

3 жыл бұрын

Arjun and TR-85 would barely pass this ERA and then 200mm left to punch thru.

The most useless tank is one without FUEL.

@user-os7re3cs9g

2 жыл бұрын

No then its a bunker

Bob Semple tank: "Hey, wait a second. . ."

@LockheedC-130HerculesOfficial

3 жыл бұрын

Tonk: wait, you guys are getting chassis?

@ducklingchief8289

3 жыл бұрын

No one would shoot it, because of its cuteness

@affentaktik2810

3 жыл бұрын

actually not a bad tank considering the logistical and operational capabilities of new zealand. Also considering New Zealands REssources it could be produced with domestic products so altho one hell of a meme it had some real thought behind it

@startingbark0356

3 жыл бұрын

@@affentaktik2810 its as tall as an maus tho

@affentaktik2810

3 жыл бұрын

@@startingbark0356 well yeah the fact that its a big square block is kinda unfortunate lol

Unpopular opinion: I never get bored to that War Thunder ad

@philemon26

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, because that sponsor is really fitting for this channel.

@cosmin_budda

3 жыл бұрын

Lmaoo

@Kalashnikov413

3 жыл бұрын

And plus, i also enjoy War Thunder, even tho there's some minus in it (which i rarely complained/encountered)

@umeshsonkar4177

3 жыл бұрын

I actually started playing seeing this add every time and I quite liked it

@Kalashnikov413

3 жыл бұрын

@@umeshsonkar4177 so you're new? Ok then

I was this early that I witness the destruction of Soviet Union

@gnas1897

3 жыл бұрын

No man deserves to witness such sad thing comrade

@johansenhung4039

3 жыл бұрын

Such scene no comrade can bare

@Eire_Aontaithe

3 жыл бұрын

The fall of the Soviet Union, the most beautiful thing that i never saw cuz i wasn't born yet...

@user-fx9rw7xc1e

3 жыл бұрын

@@Eire_Aontaithe But you will witness the REALLY, non sarcastic, most beautiful thing: the fall of the US Empire 😊

@Eire_Aontaithe

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-fx9rw7xc1e Maybe i will, who knows, empires don't last forever, the roman didn't, the british ruling came to an end, the german empire didn't. (I see you are a communist by the red star so i wont bother arguing with brainless people)

When you build the tank plant next to the vodka distillery

I decided that judging a tank by solely its hard stats can't always determine how useful it may be. Let me remind you that upgraded Shermans were used to great effect during the Six-Day War despite their apparent obsolescence in that conflict.

@michaeleastes1705

2 жыл бұрын

The crews made all the difference.

@Hagendaz97

2 жыл бұрын

Fight against Arabs makes everything look more efficient...

@LoboalphaMASTER

Жыл бұрын

*"Let me remind you that upgraded Shermans were used to great effect during the Six-Day War despite their apparent obsolescence in that conflict."* Except that what happened to this tank is the complete opposite of what happened with the upgraded shermans, while the upgraded shermans took an outdated tank hull and replaced its turret and weapons for a modern one, this tank on the video had an old and extremely outdated turret and gun placed onto a much more modern modern hull. In other words, its a downgrade, rather then an upgrade.

@Spaced92

Жыл бұрын

As some of the best tanks in the world right now (not that many countries put as much money into it) aren't exactly striking fear into Ukrainians, this is the correct take, also Romania didn't build these to fight off superpowers, in a way they are ingenious for reusing resources and creating something suitable for their needs and price concerns whereas many countries would just choose to have basically no tanks. Whereas my country bought hundreds of Abrams and will never use them, too heavy, even to support coalitions we could have just bought lighter tanks. The whole point isn't about upgrading or downgrading.

In 1976-1978 I served in the USSR army. I was the commander of the tank T-64B.

@csme07

3 жыл бұрын

Tell me about the tank

@artelislt

2 жыл бұрын

Opa, lietuvis

@Alex_Mercer_

2 жыл бұрын

@@csme07 ay hord is very sexe

@stefanschutz5166

2 жыл бұрын

And?

Arjun: Finally, a Worthy Opponent, OUT BATTLE WILL BE LEGENDARY

@dimes7742

3 жыл бұрын

Copied

@dacke13

3 жыл бұрын

Please elaborate why arjun sucks? I don’t know anything about it

@imatoaster7831

3 жыл бұрын

@@dacke13 redeffect has a video on it

@GlabePainBliar

3 жыл бұрын

The fact it has a munition literally called the penetration cum blast makes it the best

@shashanksekuri7231

3 жыл бұрын

@@GlabePainBliar its just a Fancy word for heat ya🤣🤣

No tank is useless in significant amounts

@cosmin_budda

3 жыл бұрын

🤣

@antimatter4733

3 жыл бұрын

I'd take one t14 over 30 of these...

@nogisonoko5409

3 жыл бұрын

@@antimatter4733 if i was against infantry and light mechanised forces? i take 30 of these than 1 T14.

@antimatter4733

3 жыл бұрын

@@nogisonoko5409 lol, wut, the t14 can carry 42 rounds of air burst HEF that will wipe out infantry and lightly armored vehicles, not to mention its 12.7mm kord hmg and 7.62 coaxial mg which don't require the crew to expose themselves. What are infantry gonna do to it? With its armor no atgm can penetrate it even if the APS system didn't intercept it, which it easily could seeing it can intercept even apfsds. Finally it has 3rd gen thermals for the gunner and commander and an advanced ballistic computer which means it'll be much more accurate at longer ranges

@nogisonoko5409

3 жыл бұрын

@@antimatter4733 42 rounds. Limited amount of APS. I even doubted APS ability to kill APFSDS. Assuming those infantries and mechanised forces have RPG-7s and long range ATGM (probably Konkurs or Kornet) with autocannons IFV it gonna be a stunlock for T14. If by any means those autocannons and anti tank rockets disabled all the T14 sensors and guns, rendering it blind and weaponless or it APS run out of ammo or being overwhelmed by various anti tank rockets, those weapon will surely make T14 Armata incapable for combat. The worse part is, you have one T14 only while for the same price you could get 30 shit tanks that could fire 30 HE rounds and 30 coaxial machine guns at the same time, sure some of them will explode due to them not having enough defenses, but those firepower alone will rout even the most hardened infantry. It like 30 Hyena tried to kill a lion. Statistically, yes it does look bad for this tank in 1v1 situation, but as far as im concerned, war never conduct in that particular way.

From the perspective of an infantry, a tank is tank. Doesn't matter how good it is fighting other tanks. As long you foot soldier with only a rifle, any tanks still will ruin your day.

@blitzkriegfritz2779

2 жыл бұрын

from a perspective of the infantry, you never walk without someone who has an Anti Tank weapon with him and a cast armour turret is an invitation for top attack munitions.

@oiermontero2310

2 жыл бұрын

@@blitzkriegfritz2779 not even a top atack. A regular anti tank gun would destroy this thing if they hit the turret

ukrain: mounts Bm-oplot turret on T-55 Chasis, BUDGET-Oplot

@notworldwarthunder2035

2 жыл бұрын

Blopblot

5:41 So cute. Proof that tanks are wholesome.

WW2 Italian tanks after seeing the thumbnail: *Sweating intensifies*

5:41 NATO tanks lagging behind the African continent in deployment of tactical livestock

This is just your opinion. I can say the T72 is the most useless tank to ever exist.

@sgt_mike9730

2 жыл бұрын

This ur your opinion no tank is really useless it’s mostly crew skill or used in wrong scenarios

@skparadise3382

2 жыл бұрын

Well its not really just opinion. Its also based off of what the tank can do. And the T-72 can do everything this tank can do but better.

@herbb8547

2 жыл бұрын

The T-80 and T-90 tanks aren't much better. They all send their turrets very high into the sky when hit.

@skparadise3382

2 жыл бұрын

@@herbb8547 They send their turrets into the sky when hit by a javelin. But every tank will be destroyed when hit by a javelin. Russian tanks only send their turrets into the air due to the ammunition layout. But all tanks, NATO included, would explode quite spectacularly if hit by a javelin.

@herbb8547

2 жыл бұрын

@@skparadise3382 Yeah, those Javelin missiles are something alright. Still, the Russian tanks do give the most spectacular explosions of all and have a 100% kill rate of their crew. Very impressive to achieve such amazing results. Russia must have had the best and brightest involved to make tanks with such, uh, capabilities. On the other hand, the Abrahams M1 tank would most likely also be taken out of action, but the crew may survive and the explosion won't be nearly as large. Boring! So, it is safe to assume that Russia wins the most dramatic tank in the world contest.

The Ukrainians may now have some newer usable turrets for those old T64 hulls.

@the_burger

2 жыл бұрын

Ukrainians are getting sent to Hitler, so we Russians will scrap em.

@dogmeat4275

2 жыл бұрын

Not sure if that's how it works but ok

Arjun and the TR-85 be like 👀

What is the name of this tank? This tank will be my new favorite trash tank.

@cosmin_budda

3 жыл бұрын

Lmaoo

@frankietsang7317

3 жыл бұрын

T-55-64

"The most useless tank ever" that's quite an interesting way to put it, I mean it's not completely useless, isn't it? If you're fighting against an insurgency/guerilla/rebellion type opposition, you won't be needing the best of the best of equipments.

@zxbzxbzxb1

3 жыл бұрын

It certainly more useful than some British designs in the 1930s. Still a pointless development though

@mrclickbaitali7029

2 жыл бұрын

they know how to ambush

@frenchfrog2248

2 жыл бұрын

@@zxbzxbzxb1 Bob Semple is the creator for the Worst/Useless tank to ever exist viewers could be very misled in this video

This video is makes Bob Semple and Tsar Tank maker happy when I saw them on heaven, thank you RedEffect. Edit: Guys, do you think I'm still alive? It feels hot, I think I'm going to hell?

Redeffect in 2021: this T-55 turret on a T-64 is useless. Russia and Ukraine in 2023: *actually using T-55s in the field*

@Fred_the_1996

5 ай бұрын

using them as cheap artillery for donbass militias on the russian side and as cheap artillery for territorial defense on the ukrainian side lol, not as actual tanks

Gaijin should implement ukraine as a Nation in warthunder for people like me who like completely useless and weird vehicles

@RedXlV

3 жыл бұрын

Just put them in the USSR tree. Ukraine was just as much a part of the USSR as Russia was.

@ee214verilogtutorial2

2 жыл бұрын

I saw one which was MTLB with unguided rocket pods for MI-24. Also MTLB with manually controlled 23mm autocannon. There are just so much possible combinations it’s insane

@csme07

2 жыл бұрын

@@ee214verilogtutorial2 MTLB with 23mm is fine that’s basically the BTR D but worse

@majungasaurusaaaa

2 жыл бұрын

Not so useless when you have to fight off russia with anything that you have.

It's a tank for supporting Infantry which is what t54/55 gets used for now. When the third world countries run out of t54 then maybe as long as it was the cheapest on the market

If your fixed in a trench a 100mm shell can spoil your day - and Ukraine have lots of old 100mm shells

AYYYY GOT THAT WARTHUNDER SPONSORSHIP BABYYYY. Was wondering when they were going to notice you, great stuff love ya channel

I’m a massive fun of your channel; best channel for high quality highly informative videos; could you do a video on the VT 4 or mbt 3000 tank

how2 get a newish tank 1. buy alot of new tractors 2. get invaded by incompetent army 3. profit

@averagefilipino742

2 жыл бұрын

Philippines: the best I can do is 8 water buffalos for these chinese bois

@voldemarvaglaots6690

2 жыл бұрын

Do you have more fairytales?

@dominatorandwhocaresanyway9617

2 жыл бұрын

@@voldemarvaglaots6690 Cinderella is enough? or better yet, paper tigers (any unproven army included)

@voldemarvaglaots6690

2 жыл бұрын

@@dominatorandwhocaresanyway9617 , that's what I talking about!

Great Video. I never heard of this tank, excellent information, thanks.

Funny how you talk about automatic lead while in War Thunder you still have to guess where to shoot

It’s a perfect tank for Elbonia! 👍

Nice video. Can you also make a video about the T-55 AGM?

@cosmin_budda

3 жыл бұрын

Yes I want too

Love your videos. Thanks for the effort.

Bob semple > Abrams Bob semple > Armata Bob semple > Challenger Bob semple > Arjun ALL HAIL THE MIGHTY BOB SEMPLE

@arandomfawn5289

3 жыл бұрын

The polish tks could eat 100 Bob semples and still do gun noises

He misspoke about the reticle's range finder. It's stadiometric, not coincidence

Arjun finally has some competition

@tritonx5433

3 жыл бұрын

Worry about thay dustbin on wheels called al khalid🤣🤣

@cosmin_budda

3 жыл бұрын

Arjun and TR85M1

@QasimAli-to5lk

3 жыл бұрын

@@tritonx5433 oooo triggered are we?😂

@tritonx5433

3 жыл бұрын

@@QasimAli-to5lk Umm not really, considering that the al khalid is a joke, Nope

@bikashnayak9311

3 жыл бұрын

After watching ARJUN- mk1A 😂😂😂 🐖🐖🐖🐖

This tank could be usefull as fire support vehicle of infantry more than tank vs.tank. It's light, maneuverable and easy to maintain.After all, not a bad invention. It uses all possible rounds that an infantry regiment needs to keep or capture a position: bust bunkers, obliterate infantry enemy platoons with HESH rounds, etc. Most suitable for assymetrical than conventional warfare.

Hi Red Effect, do you know of any updates to the T-55 that use the same D-10T2S, that is somehow valid today?

Kharkiv plant has never been the same since T-72... I think the designers now have serious alchohol problem, due to depression from Nizhniy Tagil overtaking them.

@matthiuskoenig3378

3 жыл бұрын

I think the depression started ealier, remember that while the T-54 is kharkov, the T-55 was an upgrade designed by UVZ. the fact that UVZ designs have done better (in terms of sales) since the T-54 is despressing UVZ got the contracts for the upgrades to T-54 aswell as the new and improved T-55. T-62 did better than object 430, kharkov's tank didn't even see production... T-72 did better than T-64 (atleast in terms of sales), atleast they got to be the primary tank for a few years... and T-90 did better than T-84, although by this point they are separate countries...

@RadioactiveSaddam

Жыл бұрын

If they are alive

Bruh I need this for warrhunder lmfao

my homie went full cap with the Kharkov Plant, wait until some kharkov apologist comes by and freaking pixel map your mistakes into a youtube video and comment on your tank manufacturing bachelor degree

5:41 a new technology from Rheinmetall Goat reactive armour nice very nice

M60 2000: Aight Imma head out

@Lcr34

3 жыл бұрын

inform me when they put a m60 turret on abrams hull

Arjun and Altay looks on nervously

@bulcsutoth1134

3 жыл бұрын

Altay is a decent tank

@dodgedemonsrtx

3 жыл бұрын

@@bulcsutoth1134 yeah,500mm front armor,so decent right????????

The Churchil would fit that bill

lol that talk what we see is that t-90M is burning brightest

Was curious if you could do a brief overview on US Explosive Reactive Armor. It's not really talked much about and I'm curious what the US has done in that field and how it stacks up to the Russian and Chinese kinds

@neutronalchemist3241

2 жыл бұрын

The Marines used it on the M60 at the time of the first Gulf war, but in general the west never believed much in reactive armor. It's significative that the German upgrade armor kit for the Leo I (MEXAS) and both Leonardo and General Dynamic upgrade armor kits for the M60 added composite armor and not reactive armor. The Israeli M60 upgrade kit (M60 Sabra) uses reactive armor on the MkII instead.

Day 2: Hey Red! I have a questions for you. Will you make a interview with russian tanker? And what about tank arena series? Then, you should start to compare IFVs too, or just make videot about one IFV for more content. And i have tips for new video. Czechoslovack T-72M2 modrna, MBT/KPZ-70, Object 120, . Thanks!

Can you tell me on which tanks the Arena APS is installed? I'm still pretty obscured about this.

*Useless tank to ever exist* meanwhile bob semple

Day 1: make a video about EE-T1/T2 Osório

Given that you can buy a fully refurbished basic t72 without era... for likely less than this .. hahhaha

@mungo7136

3 жыл бұрын

Why to buy it when there was relatively long era after the fall of the communism when Eastern countries would even donate you heavy armament as it was cheaper than to pay for its destruction (as they either reduced numbers due to the treaties or old Cold War numbers were too high to sustain with crumbling economy). There were quite a few projects over the world designed for the economy of less developed parts of the world which died due to abundance of this military hardware.

Good target tank to use for the Olympic Turret Throw!

Tank's designers : ah well then, nobody wants it, now what do we do about it's blueprints and such... War Thunder : Yo dudes, our game's pretty chill, maybe you could like, give it to us or something

Why are you claiming every tank except the ABRAMS, are useless?

@Kalashnikov413

3 жыл бұрын

He never said that He said that some tanks are good, but not the best one around. Wtf

idk man. war thunder introduced the type 93 which is kinda useless

"The Most Useless tank to ever exist." Friend you need to read up on the A38 Valiant. That was the most useless tank to ever be built bar none.

would be pretty cool for a event vehicle in war thunder at like 8.7. pretty op

This should be a 8.3 premium in warthunder )))

This is more useless than TR85M1?

@ABCEDEFG911

3 жыл бұрын

Yes lol who would have thought

RedEffect what is the name of the song plaing in background of your videos? Also your videos are very nice!

Bob Semple: Ah finally a worthy opponent our battle shall be legendary!

I have only one question : W H Y ?

@ClintEastwood711

3 жыл бұрын

For export to African countries that were looking for T-55's with new engine (mobility upgrade).

Halfway through the vid , I already feel disgusted with the features and modification 🤦🏻‍♂️

Hey, Redeffect, I heard that new MK. 1A version of Arjun tank has quite a bit of improvements, one article even said it could be like the M16 of tanks (as in M16 wasn't reliable but the A1 was.) Could you try taking look at it again? It could be good.

Even penguins that had been drunk after drinking Arctic Alcohol could be more effective then this. Penguins can listen to props and then go that direction to board the ship before bringing ice and melting it on the deck so that the crew would fell off the deck and then the penguins could invite Sharks over to destroy the boat before migrating to the Arctic

Another greatly detailed video there RedEffect! I have been wondering if you could make a sole video on the Croatian M-95 Degman and compare it to other NATO tanks. Mainly the Ariete and Leopard2a6 There is quite a lot of information about it so don’t worry. Also it isn’t an M-84 at all.

@cosmin_budda

3 жыл бұрын

Yes I want to see an review on that too

@aramisone7198

3 жыл бұрын

Isn't the Degman a modernized Yugoslav Vihor ?!

@Vidic236

3 жыл бұрын

@@aramisone7198 Yes

Can't wait for all the "current thing" supporters to come in

4:15 lol that was a bit delayed. Turrets just floppin around lol

Yay, our T55 modification is not the worst tank anymore !

@denisionescu5072

Жыл бұрын

It's not a t55 modification.The thing is completely re-engineered, everything is changed inside and out, only barely resembles a t55 only from the front with no view of its sides. They started with t55 blueprints and built new tanks after modifying those.

Im first one to hit like button yeyyeyys LOVE YOUR VIDS RED KEEP IT UP.

What a difference a year makes. While clearly not a great tank, I’m betting this thing would not gets it’s turret anywhere near the altitudes achieved by the T-72’s.

Cm11:nervous sweating

1:12 to skip the war thunder ad

Ples gif me maneh, need to fand aplot

Me seeing all of those destroyed Russian "modern tanks" : 😬😬

@gabbot141

2 жыл бұрын

You who doesn't even know anything about tanks yet you post something to "support Ukraine"

@orangeandbanana8864

2 жыл бұрын

@@gabbot141 supporting ukraine is not about tanks

@gabbot141

2 жыл бұрын

@@orangeandbanana8864 Making fun of Russian hardware is supporting Ukraine

@fastestfail2645

2 жыл бұрын

This is a Ukrainian tank?

@fastestfail2645

2 жыл бұрын

@@gabbot141 no, i don't support Ukraine or Russia i don't think it my countries problem but i have been making fun of the Russian the whole time. They just suck at war.

Can I ask how do you feel about the oliant MBT of South African manufacture

Cannot compete with some ww2 tank disasters for worst of all time.

Despite all that, the russian army is being defeated by Ukraine. Even with "useless" tanks. How bad is the russian army?

@rogue__agent5884

2 жыл бұрын

There not tho Ukraine tank are barely doing anything

@xXEndLessKaosXx

2 жыл бұрын

@@rogue__agent5884 what 😂😂😂😂

@fastestfail2645

2 жыл бұрын

What? anti tank rockets are killing Russian tanks. Most Ukrainan tank have been killed by Russian tanks. Russian tank are way better than Ukrainian tanks but western AT weapons are better than Russian tanks.

@alexusmc2384

2 жыл бұрын

@@xXEndLessKaosXx Same idk

Shows you did little to no research on this topic.

@m.o.r.bgabriel5193

3 жыл бұрын

Ukrainian spotted.

@TheTeKuZa

3 жыл бұрын

It is too useless to be researched. Too much waste of time

They would have been better off making those chassis into self-propelled artillery or engineer vehicles.

@alexusmc2384

2 жыл бұрын

Ikr

That's a stadiametric rangefinder not a coincidence one. A coincidence rangefinder uses an optical device that has two periscopes in a horizontal configuration, one of the mirrors is able to rotate. The range is calculated from the angle of the mirror when the two images coincide.

Ukranians have worse tanks

WTF, Pakistan bought 100 to counter insurgence. Enemy using low grade weaponry, so it make perfect sense to serve the purpose for a very low price tank. It cannot go for a tank war with more advance tank. But what is the different if compared to IFV! IFV also useless with very thin armor plate. But it serve purpose to transport troops.

This tank would have been much more useful with just a heavy machine gun or even a quad mount, because it is only going up against infantry with MANPADS and maybe helicopters. Unless your enemy is dueling you with a 76 mm M4 Medium or a Panzer IV. Moreover, with just machine guns it would be even more mobile and, with no long gun, it is a lot better in close quarters.

The t55 did have the ability to fire atgm's btw, they aren't as good as the t64's but they are there

@skparadise3382

2 жыл бұрын

That was the T-55M that had the ability to fire ATGMs, the T-55M has composite add ons, an improved fire control system, laser range designator, and actual systems needed to fire and track the ATGM. The T-55 did not have this. And the turret on the tank in the video is the turret of a T-55, not a T-55M

@RedEffect So i wanted to point out something not related to the video. You have often said that the abrams L/44 gun needs an upgrade but the crux of the issue is that a longer gun will actually degrade it’s ability to defeat heavy ERA such as kontact 5 era. This is because m829a3 is like american version of 3bm42 mango in the sense that the steel tip is what set off the era allowing the main core to penetrate the armor unhindered. If you increase its velocity any further, the projectile will go so fast when striking ERA that by the time the explosives went off, the main core is now the one being affected, not the steel tip. This is why they developed M829A4. Assuming it is loaded back to higher velocities it is on par with DM63 L/55 in most respects despite being fired from a shorter gun. In fact, prototypes of M829A3 have already reached up to 1000mm penetration (most likely perforation and spalling, “penetration” as in the projectile gets through intact is more likely at 850mm) but as previously stated the main purpose when developing m829a3 was to defeat kontact 5, not to penetrate as much armor as possible. M829a4 on the other hand IS meant to penetrate as much armor as possible unlike A3 since spending RND on basically a m829a3 copy paste makes no sense.