Organic chemistry naming examples 3 | Organic chemistry | Khan Academy

Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicing-and saving your progress-now: www.khanacademy.org/science/o...
Organic chemistry naming examples 3, containing branching and cycles. Created by Sal Khan.
Watch the next lesson: www.khanacademy.org/science/o...
Missed the previous lesson? www.khanacademy.org/science/o...
Organic Chemistry on Khan Academy: Carbon can form covalent bonds with itself and other elements to create a mind-boggling array of structures. In organic chemistry, we will learn about the reactions chemists use to synthesize crazy carbon based structures, as well as the analytical methods to characterize them. We will also think about how those reactions are occurring on a molecular level with reaction mechanisms. Simply put, organic chemistry is like building with molecular Legos. Let's make some beautiful organic molecules!
About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
Subscribe to Khan Academy’s Organic Chemistry channel: / channel
Subscribe to Khan Academy: kzread.info_...

Пікірлер: 86

  • @leeanthony5140
    @leeanthony514011 жыл бұрын

    I just watched 8 videos in a row and I learned SO much information! I never knew this stuff before. Very interesting

  • @WatchMeRise13
    @WatchMeRise1314 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for doing organic chemistry!!

  • @MegaTheDing
    @MegaTheDing8 жыл бұрын

    Would the systematic name for the second molecule be 5-heptyl-1-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-propylcyclononane?

  • @pewnit

    @pewnit

    7 жыл бұрын

    Yep.

  • @ThreeNamesGrace

    @ThreeNamesGrace

    7 жыл бұрын

    I think it should be 1-heptyl-5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-propylcyclononane; because, in this case, we would be considering the heptyl group as the start, this because of alphabetical order (heptyl, dimethylethyl, propyl).

  • @leahgreene5880

    @leahgreene5880

    6 жыл бұрын

    Axel Bryan Joel Yañez Meraz Incorrect; it should be numbered to have the lowest possible numbers and should be 5-heptyl-2-propyl-1-(1,1-dimethylethyl)cyclononane.

  • @lianshaun7464
    @lianshaun74647 жыл бұрын

    thank u very much sir, these videos are quite useful , rethanks

  • @husein724
    @husein72412 жыл бұрын

    thank you very much this help me a lot with my course work :D

  • @asmasiddiqui515
    @asmasiddiqui5159 жыл бұрын

    Easy peasy :) Love your videos!

  • @Kimjongil3000
    @Kimjongil300011 жыл бұрын

    thank you very much I am grateful for this video

  • @bradleyhb
    @bradleyhb14 жыл бұрын

    Yes, please rock on.

  • @patrickasinger2681
    @patrickasinger268110 жыл бұрын

    I could be wrong about this but I believe the general rule for placing in alphabetical order is that if the prefix is used for some sort of naming (sec, tert, etc. or di, tri, etc.) then it is not considered in the ranking. However, if the prefix describes a characteristic ( like -iso) then it is included in the ranking. For the second example, isobutyl and tertbutyl would both work and thus means there are 2 correct names for the entire molecule.

  • @norwayte
    @norwayte14 жыл бұрын

    To start organic chemistry with naming and explain the background is another brilliant idea. Keep on going.

  • @iemgmod6998
    @iemgmod699811 жыл бұрын

    A QUESTION: for the first example, i remember from an earlier video of urs that we start numbering the attached compound (in this case the butyl group) from where its attached to the the parent chain.. why did u start from the other end?????? PLS REPLY, thank you

  • @sebastianvettel7363

    @sebastianvettel7363

    4 жыл бұрын

    Since there are two chains of 13 carbons, we pick the chain which has a larger number of branches. If we start from the absolute right, then there is one branch only. However, if we start the way Sal started in this video, we would be getting two branches (methyl and propyl). That looks like a s-butyl group but it is simply a methyl group from the 3rd carbon.

  • @beastneedforspeed
    @beastneedforspeed7 жыл бұрын

    For the first one i counted from the very right i got 13 as the longest chain and my common name was 4-s butyl tridecane. Is that right or am i missing something?

  • @arcisle5162

    @arcisle5162

    6 жыл бұрын

    thats what i got too

  • @philipranjit4586

    @philipranjit4586

    5 жыл бұрын

    i know this is a year old but i got the same answer first time around. but im kinda sure thats wrong because i think for numbering you have to take the chain with more branches. So if you count from the very right you only have one sec butyl branch. But if you take the other long chain you'll have one methyl branch and one propyl branch. this is what i remember from school just putting it out there if anyone has the same doubt.

  • @sebastianvettel7363

    @sebastianvettel7363

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@philipranjit4586 Yeah it is correct. He even told it in the video.

  • @Mefion91
    @Mefion9113 жыл бұрын

    @junior1984able from what Hal said in a previous video, we just assume there is a hydrogen attached unless specified otherwise

  • @choijh88
    @choijh8813 жыл бұрын

    @RoyceRK At the central Carbon of the Butyl group , Iso- has 2 chains attached to the central Carbon (+1 chain to the main branch), whereas Tert- has 3 chains attached to the central Carbon, +1 chain connecting the Butyl group with the main branch. Hope that helps

  • @spurti
    @spurti3 жыл бұрын

    Could it be also 3-methyl-4-isopropyltridecane ???

  • @GoodFilmStudio
    @GoodFilmStudio4 жыл бұрын

    So I am confusion: when do we use alphabetical order and when Chan Ingold Prelog rules?

  • @djomla69
    @djomla6911 жыл бұрын

    i think it's 1-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-5-hepthyl-2-propylcyclononane. It's because on 1st C atom you have 1,1 dimethylethyl group, so that's 1-(1,1-dimethylethyl). Next, you have hepthyl group on 5th C atom and propyl group on 2-nd C atom, but 5-hepthyl goes before 2-propyl because of alphabethical order - H stands before P.

  • @OMG-qr3kv

    @OMG-qr3kv

    3 ай бұрын

    Doesn’t “h” come before “m”? So it would be: 5-heptyl-1-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-propylcyclononane. You ignore the “d” in dimethylethyl to determine the order no?

  • @dariyachoudhary5216
    @dariyachoudhary52166 жыл бұрын

    Hey we can also write the first compound's name as 4-butyl tridecane. Can't we?

  • @cinematographyer
    @cinematographyer11 жыл бұрын

    For the first one, instead of the methyl and prophyl, if you named it the other way would you still get the same result?

  • @NGarcon
    @NGarcon12 жыл бұрын

    for the first molecule would 4-sec butyltridecane work also?

  • @Inspiteofallthedanger
    @Inspiteofallthedanger13 жыл бұрын

    Sal, alphabetical rules are only a secondary consideration to assigning the lowest possible numbering sequence. In the last molecule you drew, if you switched the positions of tert-butyl and heptyl, heptyl would now be designated as "1" even though butyl comes first alphabetically. Lowest possible numbering >> alphabetical priority.

  • @OMG-qr3kv

    @OMG-qr3kv

    3 ай бұрын

    I thought I remember something about this! I was sure that lowest possible numbering takes priority so we wouldn’t number based on alphabetical order but instead by assigning lowest possible number to the branches. Otherwise the numbering would change if you used common vs standard naming for that second compound right?

  • @introvideo5064
    @introvideo5064 Жыл бұрын

    So the systematic name of the second compound would be 1- bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-5-heptyl-2-propylcyclooctane. Right?

  • @SCIGEEK15
    @SCIGEEK1513 жыл бұрын

    Hey.. Question?? Don't you have 2 propyl groups on C4 ? making it 3-methyl-4dipropytridecane? if not.. then y?

  • @JoshS24
    @JoshS2412 жыл бұрын

    Quick question if anyone knows the answer. On the first one, could it be 3-methyl-4-n-propyl? Isn't that the common name and hes just using the systematic for the propyl group....or am I way off?

  • @user-ns5kr5fe2e

    @user-ns5kr5fe2e

    5 жыл бұрын

    the first example must be named "4(1-methylpropyl)tridecane" or "4-s-butiltridecane" because main chain have one group on 4 th C. third C do not have any groups

  • @ihofaerefa
    @ihofaerefa12 жыл бұрын

    why isn't the tert butyl also considered iso-butyl?

  • @AnahitaVasudev
    @AnahitaVasudev11 жыл бұрын

    instead of tert butyl why cant we say isobutyl in this case ?

  • @poppinfresh101
    @poppinfresh10112 жыл бұрын

    Why is tertbutyl considered alphabetically first but say if it were a isobutyl it wouldnt? I swear in other videos the 'i' in iso is considered in the alphabetical order over the hydrocarbon name where as it's not for tert?. Am I missing something?

  • @Mefion91
    @Mefion9113 жыл бұрын

    As for my question, for the second molecule, are both the following names correct? 1-tert-butyl-5-heptyl-2-propyl cyclononane OR 1-heptyl-5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-propyl cyclononane

  • @veereshammiryala6610
    @veereshammiryala66104 жыл бұрын

    If the chain is bigger than the ring which should take as a backbone

  • @HOLLAitisGilanne
    @HOLLAitisGilanne12 жыл бұрын

    Is there no systematic naming for the 1-t-butyl-5-heptyl-2-propyl-cyclononane structure?

  • @jukeboxheroes
    @jukeboxheroes11 жыл бұрын

    I think it's: 1-ethyl-(1,1 dimethyl)-2-propyl-5-heptyl cyclononane

  • @Spoopy_Snoopy
    @Spoopy_Snoopy11 жыл бұрын

    Yes, iso-butyl is -CH2-CH-(CH3)2 tert-butyl is -C-(CH3)3

  • @shinjy1207
    @shinjy120713 жыл бұрын

    i'm taking organic chemistry now and my professor told us that we name the parent chain first, then we start to name the substituents. And he mentioned that we start to number carbons on the main chain starting from the largest charm, in this case will be heptyl - for the second compound. I'm confused since your word and his word are different, which one is true? do we go by alphabetical order no matter the size or the charm or do we have to consider them in naming?

  • @sudharshan358
    @sudharshan35810 жыл бұрын

    in the 2nd problem when we consider to use common name for tert butyl then we have to consider it as one and then take (T) as the 1st letter so the final solution is 1-heptyl-7-propyl-6-tert-butyl-cyclononane. I say this because in the next video you have taken iso-butyl as one word and taken I as the 1st letter.

  • @MasoodMS
    @MasoodMS12 жыл бұрын

    can tertbutyl be called isobutyl?

  • @ciao_abhi
    @ciao_abhi7 жыл бұрын

    6:20 the previous video you said you number the ring in a direction such that you start with the first branch group and the next group you encounter has the lowest possible number. Why is it alphabetical now?

  • @ciao_abhi

    @ciao_abhi

    7 жыл бұрын

    never mind. I should have kept watching the video after 6:25

  • @junior1984able
    @junior1984able13 жыл бұрын

    my question, is every time theres a point in the structure, its a carbon atom?? so how do you know if theres a hydrogen there???

  • @ADOSMOORINOS
    @ADOSMOORINOS8 жыл бұрын

    To me tert-butyl looks like isobutyl. Also, on a test, if I forgot what tert-butyl looked like, could I name it something like (1,1-dimethylethyl)

  • @RuanWun

    @RuanWun

    8 жыл бұрын

    +aiden Moore Yes you can.

  • @saminatariq561

    @saminatariq561

    8 жыл бұрын

    no tert butyle doesn't look like iso butyl but neo butyl

  • @AndreaLovelieee
    @AndreaLovelieee7 жыл бұрын

    How did you get trisecane from?

  • @dongwenkai1399

    @dongwenkai1399

    7 жыл бұрын

    watch video 2-"Naming Simple Alkanes"

  • @dongwenkai1399

    @dongwenkai1399

    7 жыл бұрын

    P.S>did you mean tridecane?

  • @Paragota
    @Paragota10 жыл бұрын

    Could the second one be: 1-heptyl-5,5-dimethyethyl-4-propylcyclononane ?

  • @cowboys430isback
    @cowboys430isback11 жыл бұрын

    I love you.

  • @user-ns5kr5fe2e
    @user-ns5kr5fe2e5 жыл бұрын

    the first example must be named "4(1-methylpropyl)tridecane" or "4-s-butiltridecane" because main chain have one group on 4 th C. third C do not have any groups в первом примере если назвать "3-метил-4-пропилтридекан", то это будет другая молекула, у которой к третьему атому главной цепи присоединен метил, а к четвертому пропил. На самом деле втор-бутильная группа целиком стоит на 4-м атоме, как ни крути. но все равно спасибо! может быть такие ошибки даже нужны ;) для проверки

  • @aguyinspace1783
    @aguyinspace17837 жыл бұрын

    could you pls tell the systematic naming of the second compound????

  • @pewnit

    @pewnit

    7 жыл бұрын

    1-heptyl-5-(1,1-dimethyl ethyl)-4-propyl cyclononane

  • @karam1184

    @karam1184

    7 жыл бұрын

    I think you are correct, and it would suffice, however I think your numbering should start 1 at the dimethyl ethyl group. So it should be, 5-heptyl-1-(1,1-dimethyl ethyl)-2 propyl cyclononane.

  • @pewnit

    @pewnit

    7 жыл бұрын

    Karen M But di doesn't count in alphabetical naming, right?

  • @ThreeNamesGrace

    @ThreeNamesGrace

    7 жыл бұрын

    Punit Daga Yes, it doesn't.

  • @leahgreene5880

    @leahgreene5880

    6 жыл бұрын

    Correct, but you should have the lowest possible numbers for the substitutes. So it should be 1,2,5 instead of 1,4,5.

  • @nihayaturrohmah4230
    @nihayaturrohmah42303 жыл бұрын

    #8

  • @the.albertan
    @the.albertan11 жыл бұрын

    I believe iso is for 2 branches only.... Somebody correct me if I'm wrong

  • @bol3iz
    @bol3iz8 жыл бұрын

    Why is cyclononane at the end? the n from nonane comes before the p in propyl??

  • @killbot0011101000101

    @killbot0011101000101

    7 жыл бұрын

    Cyclononane is the backbone, so it goes at the end.

  • @frostboomba1462

    @frostboomba1462

    7 жыл бұрын

    lol

  • @madk777
    @madk77713 жыл бұрын

    @s05bf1c5 because there are 3 carbons attached to the same carbon. Isobutyl would mean the main chain, attached to a carbon which is attached to another carbon which is attached to 2 carbons as in: -C-C-C2. Remember, the iso's are the 'Y' type things. Hope I didn't confuse you further. Watch the example 2 video.

  • @curtpiazza1688
    @curtpiazza1688 Жыл бұрын

    😊🎉

  • @kanochain
    @kanochain12 жыл бұрын

    In organic it is assumed that the Carbons are saturated with hydrogen. I.e They contain all the hydrogen's that are possible to attach.

  • @hanoonayassin8697
    @hanoonayassin86979 жыл бұрын

    last video .. u said that ( iso propyl comes before methyl ) cuz i of iso comes first beforem of methyl ... and now u put tert butyl before heptyl ... :) explain please if u dont mind ...

  • @MegaTheDing

    @MegaTheDing

    8 жыл бұрын

    +MMM yassin He actually explained it in the video - in isopropyl the "i" would be considered for the alphabetical rule whereas for tert-butyl, its the "b" that is considered. He simply explained it as "if the name has a hyphen, don't consider what comes before the hyphen" :)

  • @cinematographyer
    @cinematographyer11 жыл бұрын

    gene

  • @vijeth2797
    @vijeth279711 жыл бұрын

    systematic naming--> 1-heptyl 4-propyl 5-(1,1 dimethylethyl) cyclononane Am I right?

  • @zacharygragg5822
    @zacharygragg582212 жыл бұрын

    113-0

  • @Raiders6thgoalie
    @Raiders6thgoalie11 жыл бұрын

    Because the ring doesn't count as part of the chain.

  • @yajingran7460
    @yajingran74609 жыл бұрын

    why is the first one tri?

  • @0xVikas

    @0xVikas

    8 жыл бұрын

    Cus is thirteen, everything after 10 has root word of the previous numbers ( 1-9 ) and has a deca at end like for 12 it's dodeca

  • @yajingran7460

    @yajingran7460

    8 жыл бұрын

    ahahahthank you.

  • @israelcaetano
    @israelcaetano7 жыл бұрын

    .

  • @Hebrewhammer1717
    @Hebrewhammer17179 жыл бұрын

    Is the correct systematic naming: 5-heptyl-1,1-bis(1-methylethyl)-2-pentylcyclononane?

  • @pewnit

    @pewnit

    7 жыл бұрын

    Not bis... its *1-heptyl-5-(1,1-dimethyl ethyl)-4-propyl cyclononane.*

  • @ladynottingham89
    @ladynottingham8910 жыл бұрын

    its not hard but its freaking tedious

  • @teamx2143
    @teamx21438 жыл бұрын

    Africanmovies