Final Exams and Video Playlists: www.video-tutor.net/

Just finished my homework in GenChem. Thanks for this😊

You're like my second lecture, thanks so much and you should make more videos on ode🙏

saving my life for the past 4 yeras. The goat of all academic tyvm sir.

Powerful lesson in less than 12 min.!

Thanks a lot. Clear and simple

Man you are a legend thank you so much

Great video. Thank you!!!

Love it, u are so good. Your videos are so helpful

Thank you for the explanation, I learnt a lot!💯

Not all heroes wear capes! God bless!!!

@omoleadebisi

2 жыл бұрын

Love these videos, they’re so helpful

you're literally saving my GPA :

You work is a piece of cake for my supper and dinner🙏

The most clutch man on youtube

Thanks bro it helps a lot

That's really helpful,my notes couldn't give me answers to some of the complex amides explained

Very helpful ☺️ thank you

So great it was!

good job sir!

Thank you brotherrrrr

you are AWESOME thank you

Wow ..that was very good from you sir

I understand this better than what my teacher is telling me...

Thank u very much.

If a tertiary amide (with ethyl and methyl as R' and R") is a substituent of an 8-carbon saturated carboxylic acid attached to its carbon #6, would you use, for example, N-ethyl-N-methyl-6-carbamoyloctanoic acid?

Thanks teacher ❤❤❤❤

Thanks a lot 😊😊

at 6:44 wouldn't the methyl substituent on the benzene be 3-methyl ?? In all other examples you start numbering under the doubled bonded O but here the numbering started to the C attached to the benzene.

@yujina7833

4 жыл бұрын

will someone answer this , I really need to no why its not 3-methyl thought its correct 2-methyl cuz when i googled N,2-dimethybanzamide it gave the same structure !

@pureconfuzion

4 жыл бұрын

I agree, we need someone to explain this mystery!

@yujina7833

4 жыл бұрын

I don't know, but if you see naming the aromatic compounds video, you'll notice that in cases like this when ever a benzene ring is attached to a functional group, and you want to count the substitute on the ring, you start from the carbon on the ring that is attached to the functional group not from the carbon on the functional group I don't know if I'm making sense but this is what I've noticed... Hope someone with a better understanding can help us here

@Andrew-kh7rz

4 жыл бұрын

yea...i don't know...someone needs to explain this plsss

@michaelmurtagh330

4 жыл бұрын

The reason why it is N,2-Methylbenzamide is because the methyl is placed on the second carbon of the benzene, and not of the longest possible chain. The group's numbering is always based on its position relative to the ring, and not to the rest of the molecule. I would recommend reviewing Unsaturated hydrocarbons as it is more thoroughly explained there.

Thank you

Thanks for these, I did my degree a long long time ago... was a little confused by the carboxamide at 5.33 (why not follow the same earlier protocol to make cyclohexanamide)?

@ordimfavour6277

2 жыл бұрын

because thats the only exception

@satgul

Жыл бұрын

The amide carbon is not counted in the ring That's why it's carboxamide

I want to practice. Is there any online source where I can practice?

Lots of love

Thanks

Thanks:)

I've got a question. I saw in another video that all N- substituents should be listed before the main chain substituents. Which one is correct?

@fareedsayed6300

2 жыл бұрын

This one

thanks alot

@chanderkant7045

3 жыл бұрын

Sir I am in class 11th but it is still very helpful for me thanks sir

Are amides always terminal?

thx 💕

at 5:40 why is it cyclohexane carboxamide and not just cyclohexanamide or cyclohexan-1-amide

@jimhalpert9803

4 жыл бұрын

Because the people making the nomenclature suck and think it's funny when people forget it's written in a tough way instead of an obvious way

@legendproductions6550

3 жыл бұрын

because amide is directly attached to the ring, its a special case. When there is ring or symmetric structure we use carboxamide. in aldehyde we use, carbaldehyde, etc. hope it helped you...

@samanthaohjy

3 жыл бұрын

the IUPAC name should be cyclohexylmethanamide

@danielesemezie4436

3 жыл бұрын

Of course it would make sense to that but you would have to realize another carbon is apart of the functional group, and because of this cyclohexanamide isn't the same as cyclohexane carboxamide

@danielesemezie4436

3 жыл бұрын

you would be surprised if you searched them both you would realize they are completely different structures. But really good observation.

what happens if there is an alcene? how does the name change

I’ve been writing it wrong the entire time I called it 2-Aminoethan-2-ol

5:41

5:49 what if Cl was in the example instead of NH2?

@dawnmyke2161

Жыл бұрын

That becomes another function group- Acid Chloride. Name by replacing the -ic of the acid with -yl and add Chloride. In effect, that would have been benzoyl chloride.

we dont need to put 1,6- hexanediamide in the last example?

@yashsaxena524

2 жыл бұрын

Yes it is necessary to numbering the functional group

@yashsaxena524

2 жыл бұрын

So make it correct

sahit xila xila

Great

please explain why use 'N', what is the meaning of 'N'?

@taniasawaya26

5 жыл бұрын

it means that the alkyl group is attached to the N, it's not a ramification of the parent/principal carbon chain so it doesn't have a number associated with it

@jorgemercent2995

5 жыл бұрын

@@taniasawaya26 thank you kind stranger

At 8:27 "Now let's work on a more complicated example" 😫 Wait wasn't it already getting complicated?? 😨😨😨

@ximelp7268

6 жыл бұрын

Lol

@jimhalpert9803

4 жыл бұрын

It was so easy example...

how to name it if its a substituent like how do we use its prefix in name

@varchasvimishra2834

6 күн бұрын

Carbamoyl is the prefix used for amides and make sure to not count it's carbon in principal carbon chain

what level is this?

@tiernanomahoney3925

Жыл бұрын

10th grade in South Korea

bro didnt undersstand how that was N,2 dimethyl benzamide and not N,3 dimethyl benzamide

@poonamramawat7637

3 ай бұрын

Benzene ring is taken as the parent chain.. not the amide one

@remarkygona9578

Ай бұрын

He is right actually because it contains 3 carbonar atoms going to methyl, one C connected to N and O​@@poonamramawat7637

Thanks Mark Wahlberg!

I will dedicate my degree to you

I think the naming of benzamide is wrong. You didnt take into account the carbon in the carbonyl group.

@Kakashishonen

2 ай бұрын

Nope it's correct

quite viiiiiiiiideo

poggers only only poggers can like

Hello

I like my professor. But my God she over complicates this shit. Thanks man