Watch the full episode now when you join our Locals: mattfradd.locals.com/post/5610491/jordan-peterson-interview

@isabellaschorno3714

Ай бұрын

Hi Matt, big fan of your content. There is this preacher on KZread (Cleveland Street preachers) he recently made a post about the virgin Mary. I thought you might be interested in checking it out. I believe he used to be catholic but is now protestant. Also has some really good content. 🙏

@MarkoMakela-kk7qf

Ай бұрын

Jordan forgot completely the most profound person to this day, Greta Thunberg...The world may need a some sort of Jesus or something like it, but not any who are just seeking a fame with various means without any sense at all... I don't know which is worse, the mediaval times when any knowledge was pratically unable to spread by anyone to frorish or this day, when all kind of people can freely spread there nonsense in a second to everywhere in the world??? I know that physics are now talking about 'fine tuning' of the universe but what we need in our world is more like a hard core tuning in all possible fronts...

@ordinary_deepfake

Ай бұрын

Hollow oh noooo

@CloudWithoutASky

29 күн бұрын

the big bang was conjured by a catholic. it wasn't in no way anti-religious as a hypothesis and did not disprove anything, if anything, it molds in line with theological understanding on the Character that is God. Infact, most of Big Bang is conjured from philosophy and imagination, then conjectured over the concept of all formed levels of radiation, implies the Big Bang exists simply because radio waves, light, etc, just implodes and goes outward, so they assume the universe expands and explodes in said direction..... I think. im no scientist and i actually sucked in science class despite trying hard. But one thing i will tell you. Big Bang has been used a political tool to say to dumb innocent folks watching TV to believe there is anti-evidence for a God existing. it all in fact originated from aristotle. Aristotle talked about an infinite observable universe, and many jews and muslims disliked it, over time Christians went back and forth saying yes and no to it being infinite and expanding.

@alexanderwhite298

20 күн бұрын

Jordan Peterson knows nothing about how the scientific community works, because if he did he would not say such things. Climate change is real and I know because I can read scientific data and I live in a coastal town.

Jordan, I sincerely respect you. After, all the attacks, you stand firm and speak your mind.

@SupernalOne

13 күн бұрын

Sadly, sometimes he is mistaken - I've caught him at it - an opinion should be based on truth, or it's a bad opinion

Hearing Jordan Peterson call John Kerry "Skeletor himself" will likely be the highlight of my day. That comment is just gorgeous! If it weren't for the fact that God exists, Peterson would get my vote for Master of the Universe.

@reekinronald6776

Ай бұрын

Sometimes I think JP is the John the Baptist of our day....Repent!

@johnchandler1687

Ай бұрын

I heard that Herman Munster was suing Kerry for Cultural Appropriation.😅

@johngeier8692

28 күн бұрын

A dishonest duplicitous politician who is colluding with ridiculous and economically destructive popular delusions.

@jjhpor

24 күн бұрын

"the fact that God exists" Not true but it would be nice to have some entity to blame for cancer, malaria, earthquakes, birth defects and oh-so-much more suffering that is part of the natural world. The biggest joke, of course, is the common nonsense heard from Christians of the "merciful Jesus". There's a real scam.

@SupernalOne

13 күн бұрын

when a psychologist gets sh!tty, you know that he's lost his fairness of mind - he has reasons to be pissed off, but he devalues his own expertise when he ceases to be the adult in the room and gets vituperative

Good to see high profile people like Jordan, speaking out against the climate scam.

@jjhpor

24 күн бұрын

"The climate scam" Maybe you can explain why insurance companies are pulling out of areas where climate has changed the odds, why oil companies are making changes to their practices due to climate changes, the increase in storm severity in the Midwest, the loss of ice in Greenland and Antarctica, retreating glaciers, increased flooding in Miami. That's just a taste.

@pauljackson2409

24 күн бұрын

@@jjhpor Yeah, just a taste of the propaganda. Why not look at the 100 year downward trends in Hurricanes, Tornadoes Typhoons and wild-fires. No trend in droughts and floods and the 95% fall in weather related deaths over the last 100 years. Stop relying on CNN or the BBC for your information, sonny. If you believe Gore, you're a prize fool.

@pshehan1

20 күн бұрын

@@jjhpor Even now the many of those who said that climate science was a scam have been mugged by reality. In Australia we had a Prime Minister who declared that 'climate change is crap'. His successor took a lump of coal into parliament. He said electric vehicles would kill the weekend. They would not tow a boat. (They do,) Then the black summer fires of 2019 and floods hit. The conservative government was tossed out. The conservative parties now pay lip service to renewable energy while trying to keep fossil fuels going for as long as possible.

@TR-uw2sp

19 күн бұрын

​@jjhpor so what has been happening all throughout time. Change, in general. Let me guess the solution is more tax.

@pauljackson2409

19 күн бұрын

@@jjhpor You think that cherry-picking a few cases is an argument? Over the last century hurricanes, typhoons, tornadoes and wild-fires are significantly down in frequency. Over the same period world-wide, droughts and floods have not changed in frequency, and deaths due to weather events are down by 95%. But chicken-little tells us that there's a climate crisis.

Jordan Peterson raising his vocal pitch to do an impression is wild.

@amodernpolemic

28 күн бұрын

It was a beautiful piece of psychology.

@pshehan1

20 күн бұрын

It is a sign of a hysterical loss of objectivity and rigour.

@augustcawiezell9699

18 күн бұрын

@@pshehan1 lol ok bro

@pshehan1

18 күн бұрын

@@augustcawiezell9699 Glad you agree.

Have been recently watching Fr Chad Ripperger lay out how science has started degenerating, and the connection to Modernism. Was thinking of Peterson throughout. Can't wait for this whole interview to drop.

@flinch622

Ай бұрын

Colleges are largely about a handful of things these days: grants, the publishing racket, and sports top the list. The comment of consensus bears weight and dovetails with the publishing racket: peer review [in so many cases] has devolved into goaltending, be it of doxies or competing grants. You could arrive at an idea, have & explain logic or methodology to at least indicate a topic is worth mulling over, and a half dozen or so may jump up and say "hyet" in unison... and you are self publishing, just like that - locked out for the gravy trains sake, to keep your citations from being common [if you do pursue and persist]. Its bona fide flat earther territory, intellectually speaking. So there's a weakness in western methods: we are conditioned to accept format and volume in place of quality of argument. Pile enough agreeing citations together and all of a sudden someone is "smart"? That's a house of cards - and what most degrees are worth these days, I'm afraid. People having paid tens of thousands for some third party imprimatur face a real conundrum, especially in this era of cancel culture - disagree with an institution and they may take [or destoy the value of] your degree, and do it without proof. One thing seems true to me: the quality of science may be inversely proportional to the amount of government involved. I'm reminded of the barbs thrown at Faraday, on account of his observations were not preceded by sufficient institutional gravitas, per the hubris loaded "intellects" of his day.

@MarkoMakela-kk7qf

Ай бұрын

This is indeed a very intresenting topic as we really don't need any pre teen 'Greta Thunbergs' to preach us about anything. Some hysterical reactions in societies around the world and so has reminded of a panic and brainwash... not that it has had anything to do with the reality. Yes ofc our planet has taken some toll of the human activity, but it isn't that simple in any shape or form. Now that religion don't have too big part of a normal persons life in westewrn world, other ideas and ideologies are filling that void and usually they are compelety nonsense in any given measures. Like Lt Ripley( this beeing a movie and completely fiction ) says in 'Aliens' as she was investigated by her former actions said: 'Has the IQ suddenly dropped as I was away?'... Yes indeed... You can ask this today too. One obvious thing is that our world has been more and more devided to even smaller groups and and even one vs one situations because we have promoted induvidualism as a some kind of virtue even with personal opinioins without any arguments at all to back it up. That is completely nonsense. The first thing to do is change the whole school and education system and bring back the basics of philosophical foundation that is the basis for all modern science anyway, regardless what you think. And also make pscycholygy a mandatory subject and also require everyone to be tested that way if they want to even have a student place in univercity or high school, and more over, if they ever want to pursuit a political and social status... In my country our army has made these actions almost from the day one to ensure, that no person who is instable or could be harmful to others( to this particular society ofc ) would not ever get a gun in his or hers hands ever. Even in wars no one wants maniacs nor other kinda of unrealibities in their team.

@DesertRat.45

Ай бұрын

Keep watching him. He makes more sense than the governing trash acrosd the globe

@raymondbencak7539

Ай бұрын

Thanks Matt.........can you the video link in your comments. Tks 👍👍

@matthewcruz1709

Ай бұрын

@@raymondbencak7539 kzread.info/dash/bejne/hpOd0ZJ6grudos4.htmlsi=VIDpF1triSxoqsEA

The pareto distribution is the mathematically hardcoded manifestation of “the poor you will always have”

@calebalbertson1690

Ай бұрын

"Those that have will be given more, and those that dont have, even what they do will be taken from them."

@timrichardson4018

Ай бұрын

Yep! Simplistic explanations and solutions are wrong more often than not. Poverty is multifactorial. But even that's not the right way to think of it. Poverty is the norm historically. Wealth is the exception. The real question isn't why are there poor people. The question is how to create wealth.

@matthewcruz1709

Ай бұрын

It's also known as the Matthew principle.

@hxhdfjifzirstc894

Ай бұрын

I don't think the premise is exactly correct. For example, you must first have some kind of definition for what poverty actually is... or else you devolve into a tautology of saying that the bottom 20% are 'the poor', therefore, there's this amazingly consistent statistical pattern that societies always have 20% of their population living in """poverty.""" The real question is, what percentage of people actually live in poverty, and that can vary widely due to local economic systems, e.g. free market capitalism versus communism -- it would be silly to compare the bottom 20% in North Korea, to the bottom 20% in America. One is dying of starvation, while the other is dying of morbid obesity. In other words, there are no actual 'poor people' in America, while everyone in North Korea is poor, except the one fat communist man, with all the money and all the food. This is not to disprove the ancient wisdom that _there will always be poor people among us,_ but rather to disentangle economic statistical quintiles from a more concrete measure of poverty.

@hxhdfjifzirstc894

Ай бұрын

@@timrichardson4018 To create wealth, you should make a plan that leads to you having the ability to *use money, to make money.* For example, straight out of high school, get a job in home construction/remodeling. Save all your paychecks, until you can buy a fixer-upper house to flip. You're not going to build wealth by working for a paycheck... but you can choose a job that conveniently leads to an actual wealth building path (such as house flipping). Then you leverage your profit from that first flip, to flip 2 more houses. And the profit from those two, to flip 4 more. The pattern continues until you acquire sufficient 'critical mass' wealth, to retire and live off the interest. It could be anything... something that suits your natural talents and abilities. Some people might want to start a food cart and scale up to a restaurant chain. Or get a job as a mechanic, and build a path to flipping cars, and owning a car lot. The key is that working a regular job is not going to lead to wealth. You must somehow harness the power of money, to create profit.

The whole 97% of scientists agree BS reminds me of growing up in the late 70s watching Trident sugarless gum commercials. “4 out of 5 dentists recommend Trident for patients that chew gum.” Even myself saw through that BS after i watched enough of those ads. At first I bought into it, then i thought who are these 5 dentists? were they paid to say they’d recommend? BS always

@williamgaines9784

8 күн бұрын

It was a "clever" wording. Most people did not listen closely and it was not the dentists recommendation of the actual brand. Much was excluded from their posted survey results. The survey resulted the quoted was '4 out of 5 dentists recommend sugarless gum for their patients who chew gum', it did not state which recommend not chewing gum of any sort, how many were surveyed - maybe only 5, nor how they rounded their results. It isn't a falsehood, but it isn't the whole story either.

@shreddedhominid1629

6 күн бұрын

Authors of seven climate consensus studies - including Naomi Oreskes, Peter Doran, William Anderegg, Bart Verheggen, Ed Maibach, J. Stuart Carlton, and John Cook - co-authored a paper that settled this question once and for all. The two key conclusions from the paper are: 1) Depending on exactly how you measure the expert consensus, it’s somewhere between 90% and 100% that agree humans are responsible for climate change, with most of the studies finding 97% consensus among publishing climate scientists. 2) The greater the climate expertise among those surveyed, the higher the consensus on human-caused global warming. You are quite literally wrong.

@williamgaines9784

6 күн бұрын

@@shreddedhominid1629 "Climate consensus studies" 🙄 🤡🌎

@ethanhenley2103

16 сағат бұрын

@@williamgaines9784If you have evidence that disputes it, you should present it. But, an eye roll is not a very strong rebuttal nor is a clown emoji. If you can only offer personal attacks and not actually refute the argument or points made, then it’s no longer a civil discussion.

@williamgaines9784

13 сағат бұрын

@@ethanhenley2103 The title, "climate consus study", alone deserves the eyeroll and the clown emoji. Since the climate estimates, projections, and conclusions are based on modeling that has been inaccurate for 50+ years, there is no "evidence" to support the consensus. That the climate changes is undisputed, its triggers and causes are manifold. The conclusion that a single compound from a single source as the root is wholly unscientific.

Not science. Scientists. It's become a shame of our educational system.

@SupernalOne

13 күн бұрын

way to prejudge an entire occupation! Learn some science and judge for yourself, case by case

Today's "scientist" will say whatever YOU PAY THEM to say. And don't ever question "science".

@scoontaquex3388

26 күн бұрын

Do you know any scientists? All the ones I know are decent humans trying their best. Doesn't make them perfect, but they are far from what you claim.

@pshehan1

20 күн бұрын

You have no idea. Scientist spend their lives questioning science. You get a lot more kudos for correcting the record than putting another brick in the wall.

@swansonz3534

16 күн бұрын

Absolutely, I would love to see what percentage of this so-called science counters the interests of those paying for it.

@pshehan1

16 күн бұрын

@@swansonz3534 In the 1970s Exxon scientists sent reports to management on global warming which came to the same conclusions as scientists in public institutions. Management marked them confidential and filed them away for decades. It disbanded its research unit on these matters. Scientists at Australia's premier scientific organisation, CSIRO had its research group into these matters disbanded by a conservative government which was close to the fossil fuel lobby. Its leader declared that 'the science of climate change is 'crap'.

@michaelhaluska2971

Күн бұрын

Legitimate Scientists accept grant funding not knowing the source and the grantors don’t know who they’re donating to. It’s a DOUBLE BLIND relationship so that the research isn’t biased.

Physicist Richard Feynman stated during a lecture on science and the theoretical process that "...we make it up." At which point the students in the hall laughed. "No, no. Really, we make it up." He then clarified. "We come up with an idea, hypothesize, test our assumptions, and THEN if the results do not match our expectations - the hypothesis is wrong and no matter how pretty the idea was, it's wrong." I obviously paraphrased, but the lecture is on KZread. Look up Richard Feynman lecture. It's from the early or mid 60's and in black and white.

[Derek] Price’s law says that 50% of the work is done by the square root of the total number of people who participate in the work.

When the means of achieving the end you desire are wrong either the end you are choosing is wrong or you are wrong in choosing the means.

I totally agree I’ve known all this information for years and I don’t work for MI six

Most scientists in academia are actually doing one-off engineering for large corporations.

@pshehan1

20 күн бұрын

No they are not.

@PGHEngineer

20 күн бұрын

@pshehan1 I am the father of two researchers, one in Materials Science, the other in Computer Science. Both are working on engineering projects for well known corporations. When I was young I visited the chemistry department at Imperial College in London and whilst this is one of the top chemistry departments in the country I was informed there was no science going on there. What did they mean by that, I wondered? Well the reality is that every element on the periodic table has been found, every element has been reacted with every other element and so inorganic chemistry is a done deal. Organic chemistry offered more opportunity for exploration, but there are fewer and fewer opportunities for new discoveries. So if they aren't doing science what are they doing? Well chemical engineering for big corporations who want reactions that are faster, purer, higher yielding, and less polluting with less waste. They are using known science to achieve this, not discovering anything new.

@pshehan1

20 күн бұрын

@@PGHEngineer I am a retired scientist. I did my PhD in a chemistry department studying organometallic compounds by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. There was plenty of science going on there. I think the Imperial College man was being somewhat facetious. I have seen papers on 'pure' or 'basic' research come out of Imperial College. I published a paper which showed that the published value nuclear quadrupole moment of moybdenum- 95 and molybdenum-97 was too large by a factor of ten. This is important in NMR spectroscopic studies. I showed that the measurement of NMR relaxation times could be used to give information about the structure and motion of organometallic molecules. This was basic research but later I found a paper of mine cited in studies of liquid crystals in commercial purposes. In a department of surgery at the University of Melbourne, I studied the structure of a class of peptides called gastrins, the proliferation of which in the intestines is associated with bowel cancer. They are inactive without the attachment of ferric ions. I replaced the ferric with chromium ions which inhibited the growth of the cells. With others in the group I hold a patent for the possible treatment of bowel cancer. There is always more to discover which often seems to be 'useless' knowledge at the time but turns out not to be though corporations concentrate on carrying out or funding research with a clear applied goal in mind.

@michaelhaluska2971

17 күн бұрын

You can blame 99% of this "Climate Change" pseudoscience on the National Science Foundation - which should be defunded and privatized!

Jordan Peterson is correct.

@SupernalOne

13 күн бұрын

sometimes

@bite-sizedshorts9635

12 күн бұрын

@@SupernalOne Most of the time. Pay attention to what he says.

@corypheus7591

Күн бұрын

@@bite-sizedshorts9635 What do you mean pay? What do you mean to? What do you mean he? And what do you mean says?

I just love Jordan Peterson. Speaking truth for all to hear.

I would love him to interview Rupert Sheldrake he was talking about this before it became more well known

John "Chicken Little" Kerry, and Al "Chicken Little" Gore.

@drew6194

29 күн бұрын

Or as I refer to them: John "Potato-Head" Kerry and Albert "Einstein" Gore.

@Hupernike45

29 күн бұрын

@@drew6194 I'll accept that. I think it was Rush Limbaugh who used to refer to these people as Chicken Little. They speak and behave as if the sky is falling.

It's important that a distinction be made between the social sciences and the natural sciences, because the replicability issue primarily affects the former.

@dwwolf4636

28 күн бұрын

Optimist.

@MarcusN-kp1jn

25 күн бұрын

How many youtube comments do you post everyday, OP? I see you in the comments of every video I go to, no matter the topic.

@bite-sizedshorts9635

12 күн бұрын

It affects both. Remember "cold fusion"?

"Skeletor" good one Jordan.

I mean, surely Peterson knows part of that paper situation is that the senior acts as a supervisor which means he/she gets their name on it and their citations exponentially grow as a consequence.

I studied biology and saw some issues but my sister worked for a science journal and told me how much more issues there are with the peer-review process. A big thing I noticed that I haven't seen talked about is a lot more biased of a personal observation. This was that most people who studied science weren't motivated by what I assumed - the curious thirst for understanding that motivated the theorists we learned from - they just were good at learning and saw job opportunities. It was similar when I later attended skeptic conferences - most weren't free thinkers but were just replacing faith in one authority and tribe with another. The reality is that success in science has more to do with superficial measures of performance and sociopolitical adeptness than adherance to fundamental principle. I believe this is a degradation. I don't think as many of the old geniuses would get so far now, particularly the more "autistic" ones. Good talkers who publish in fake journals (a fast growing problem) are more favoured than those with merit. It's not entirely broken but it is harder to trust than before.

@rbarnes4076

Ай бұрын

Don't know if you are aware, but there is a thing in science right now called the 'Replication Crisis', which goes right to the heart of what Peterson is saying. Might be good reading if you aren't familiar. I was trained in science (biology) but when I realized just HOW political it was I changed to another major. Now I work in a corporation as an engineer and only have to deal with inter-departmental politics, must less problematic than dealing with a government!

@colmcille9669

Ай бұрын

@@rbarnes4076 Yes that's an issue that has always been at least a niggle but is growing exponentially. Even if we did science perfectly it's interesting to conceive of how we could be drastically mistaken based on what we don't know, but the increasing reliance on studies that have not been replicated is scary to consider because it means we don't know a lot that we think we do. And the indications based on those that have failed replication are that there are a lot that wouldn't fare well if anyone bothered to try. Add to that the increasing fabrication... Frustrating to say the least. And then, as you say, the politics. Most peer review systems break down due to poor adherance to best practice and politics. Well known researchers will find ways to highlight their identities so as to bypass the anonymity and garner favourable reviews. That's if their field is even big enough that it's not already obvious based on what labs work on what projects. I could go on but you know yourself. We haven't even mentioned money.

@pshehan1

20 күн бұрын

@@colmcille9669 Have you ever submitted a manuscript for review or been asked to review one?

@colmcille9669

20 күн бұрын

@@pshehan1 No I only ever contributed to one research project in a minor capacity during an internship between years in my degree.

@michaelhaluska2971

17 күн бұрын

Peer Review is used by social studies NOT by legitimate scientists.

Follow the money

@PaxRT87

Ай бұрын

An analysis done in 2011 on climate research found that 9 of 10 authors that have doubts about climate change have ties to Exxon Mobile. The real money is in politics and oil. Spreading doubt so that the red team can score points on the stupid libs. Our children and our children's children will see the fruit of our labor in what we did to preserve the future.

@pshehan1

20 күн бұрын

A fatuous comment made by know nothings.

@themysteriousdomainmoviepalace

20 күн бұрын

​@@pshehan1Lol!

@pshehan1

20 күн бұрын

@@themysteriousdomainmoviepalace And that is precisely the kind of argument know nothings put.

@themysteriousdomainmoviepalace

20 күн бұрын

​@@pshehan1Shall I die on this hill? 😮

I will enthusiastically upvote any content provider that puts Jordan Peterson front and center & not "translate" his words for his own screen time.

In the KZread app, I was unable to watch this. It was just frozen. I brought it up in Safari and it worked.

I wonder what the connection is between climate change and population control?? Hmmm there's a topic.

@hxhdfjifzirstc894

Ай бұрын

The connection is paganism/Satanism. Worshiping the 'weather gods', and child sacrifice. Everything goes back to the essence of Satanism, which is rebellion against God's creation, by stealing, killing, destroying, perverting, distracting, thwarting, etc. God said 'be fruitful, and multiply'... therefore Satan wants the opposite. Population control. Abortion. Worshiping the weather and the dirt or the trees, instead of God.

Thank you.

Many people today want to be Messiah, the savior of humanity.

@Supperconductor

Ай бұрын

False prophets seeking profits.

@reekinronald6776

Ай бұрын

...and they want to do it while lounging in their favourite chair sipping wine and eating cheese.

@pinehawk9600

Ай бұрын

Soros

@Theactivepsychos

Ай бұрын

You just described Peterson beautifully. The guy is trying to replace learning institutions evolved over centuries with his own learning programme. Remember this is a guy who made such bad personal choices that all his family were sick enough to have to resort to some real extreme practises. Every video he made in the early days he was drinking Diet Coke. He’s so off target and ego driven that there’s no way I’d follow his teachings. If I did I might have to start smoking again because there’s no way I had a mystical experience. I just stopped. Like my dad did, and brother, and mum, and grandad, and aunties and uncles.

@williamgaines9784

8 күн бұрын

But asking, nay DEMANDING, folks freeze to death in the Winter so he can fly everywhere in a private jet is evil. His, Kerry and ilk, motto is: YOU must sacrifice YOUR present AND future so that I can enjoy comfort today while pretending to help the unwashed masses.

Always enjoy the intellect and insight JP brings to the table. And damn those flashy threads are a plus.

Has anyone else experienced that when you click a link on KZread... instead of taking you to that video, KZread takes you to a disclosure page? Then it's hard to find the video you clicked on originally... Curiously that happened to me when I first tried to watch this video.

@bite-sizedshorts9635

12 күн бұрын

Never happened to me.

@puddintame7794

12 күн бұрын

@@bite-sizedshorts9635 Yet...

The same john kerry that's so panicked by raising sea levels has paid $11.75m for a waterfront property on Martha's vineyard. Did he think we wouldn't noticed?

I find it fascinating.The more faithful someone is to the assertions made by unknown primitive ignorant humans, the less likely these same people are to accept the explanations science has to offer for the natural world.

Can you put the whole interview already?

Here here. Cheap energy is very possible. And it would raise people out of poverty very very fast.

You tell 'em Jordan!!!

Matt, Locals isn't available in my country because of my government's demands for it to take down content it didn't like. Would it be possible for you to upload this episode to KZread as well?

This is why, I question everything we think we know.........................

Great video 👍

P-hacking isn't isolated to the psych field. Most people in university are mediocre & more interested in validation from their peers than learning something new.

fascinating, let's be careful what 'science' we accept

Destroying the rain forests of South America will have ten times the environmental impact of anything carbon based.

My professor in university said the exact same thing

Liked this!!

He is spot on!

@Montfortracing

Ай бұрын

Not really, and not sure why Catholics waste their time listening to him. Capitalism can help alleviate poverty, but it's not the only thing alleviating poverty. There are such things as cooperative economics and economics where people matter. Capitalism is a system where people mostly don't matter and only cares about the consumer and not enough about the producers. As for climate change, as Catholics we have to learn how to steer the world back to having union with nature and learn to develop technology with the aid of nature. Contraceptives are a byproduct of capitalism and modernism and industrialization. If we knew better how to develop technologies without disposing nature and human beings we wouldn't have contraceptives. Science and medicine would have reproductive technologies like NaPro in way more advanced stages than they currently are. This is part of changing the way we live and consume goods, and unfortunately conservatives like Jordan Peterson don't ever talk about that.

@theQuestion626

Ай бұрын

Pardon me but… What exactly is he “spot on“ about? Capitalism is a system that needs poverty and exploitation of labor in order to continue to function. It doesn’t do anything to alleviate poverty, what it does is disguise poverty and then have pseudo scientific justification for why poverty is somehow “the natural state“. Poverty is a creation of lack of resources, capitalism is the hoarding of resources by those with either control of capital or easy access to capital. Capitalism turns people into commodities and competitors. It is an incredibly dehumanizing economic system that views human beings as disposable. And it’s amazing to me that people can look at Jordan Peterson and think that he is speaking some kind of Bible truth given that his field of expertise is clinical psychology and not history economics or even theology. And given his track record he wasn’t very good at psychology either. He was not respected in his field and he’s not famous for his psychology. What he is famous for is his crank political positions and his sophistry.

@theQuestion626

Ай бұрын

@@Montfortracing that puzzles me as well. I can understand why a lot of the Christian Heretics in the form of the prosperity gospel and the other dominionists would listen to him because he is just as much of a dogmatic crackpot and cynical opportunist as they are. He’s also severely mentally unwell, so I’m just a little confused as to why Catholics would even remotely listen to him.

You are correct JP.

Go Jordan, Blessings.

All the science skeptics after JP, not an expert in either climate science or the philosophy of science, affirms what they already believe.

@bite-sizedshorts9635

12 күн бұрын

Intelligent people can look at the real evidence and see that the so-called experts are lying. You can compare hundred year old photos of coastlines with current ones and see that the oceans have not risen a measurable amount.

But not Kerrey's' private jet for goodness sake

The 97% consensus is this: There was a survey on the effect of manmade Co2 on temperature. 66% of the papers in the survey took no stance on the matter. Out of the remaining 34%, 33% took the stance of human emissions may contribute to SOME warming. Thats the 97% consensus

$cience 😊

@benjamink2398

Ай бұрын

So who do you trust, exactly? Is the earth flat? Was Stalin really that bad of a guy? How do you know? I'll tell you: you trust consensus. You do it for everything else. Your confirmation bias (a psychological idea, ironic) gets in the way of your thinking clearly because your brain doesn't like the feeling of having to change.

Ah ! Leave Dr. Faux-ci " alone.!

"I believe in what I see, I believe in what I hear, I believe in what I'm feeling changes how the world appears." Niel Peart.

Yup!

Respect

100% 👏👏👏👏👏

When your future grants you get as a scientist depend on your findings the incentive to cheat is strong.

@oliverheaviside2539

10 күн бұрын

The job description for research scientist, either in university or private sector, is “take their money and tell them what they want to hear.”

Good morning. Most of my comments are blocked. I really like Jordan.

Science used to be called Natural Philosophy, and that's what it still is. It's not the end all / last line of what's what. I like an old saying, "There is no such thing as modern science. There are only particular sciences, all in varying states of growth, and not all of them are in unanimous agreement among people in any particular field."

@pshehan1

10 күн бұрын

Modern science is science conducted in the modern era. It is much too large an undertaking for scientists to become experts in anything other than their own field. Mine is nuclear magnetic resonance. I did my PhD in applications of the technique in chemistry. As my career progressed, I moved into applications in medical research. I doubt that there is unanimity in any field.

Science is the new religion. 🙈

I'm with J Peterson on this climate analysis...

@Montfortracing

Ай бұрын

Your analysis on climate change should be deeper than Jordan Peterson's. You're a Catholic, right? If so, then your understanding of climate change should be more nuanced instead of just stopping at "it's not true."

@alinucalinuc4124

Ай бұрын

@@Montfortracing Exactly because you are Catholic you should be skeptical about affirmations, like "there's too many of us - bad for the planet", etc, made by ecologists. Ecologism, in the meantime, has gone too far!

@Montfortracing

Ай бұрын

@@alinucalinuc4124 you're right, we definitely need to be careful with those kinds of affirmations. But that doesn't mean we have to harbor denialism about climate change. Of course we need to fend off those population control people, but as Catholics we need to get people to look at the environment away from a consumerist impulse. Even if a Catholic has difficulty understanding the science and chemistry of the climate we know we're not here on earth to haphazardly use the earth's resources however we please. Paul VI, JPII, Benedict and Francis have all written about this and we at least should start by understanding integral ecology and develop a deeper understanding of creation beyond Jordan Peterson.

@pshehan1

10 күн бұрын

@@Montfortracing Scientist who study climate change are not experts in the environment or population or anything else. They may have opinions about these things and write or speak about them, but they can be Catholics, Protestants, Muslims, Jews, Hindus, followers of any of religion or atheists.

You should host a Tim Gordon vs Trent Horn debate on feminism

@victoriaeinbinder9487

Ай бұрын

Maybe. I wonder if Trent has changed his opinion on feminism since the Carrie Gress episode? I theologically more "normie" but I actually fully agree with Gordon on this one, that feminism and Christianity are incompatible or "inadmissible"

If I understand the way they came to the 99% consensus is that only 3% of scientists answered their survey years ago ( the fringe) and 99% of the 3% agreed

@bite-sizedshorts9635

12 күн бұрын

Many of the scientists involved never signed the final draft. But the criminals claimed they did to obtain the high numbers. Science is not a "consensus." The "consensus" used to be that the sun went around the earth. Science has to be proved through experiments using the scientific method. Their always wrong 10-year predictions show they are unfamiliar with the scientific method.

Wait, how can this be trusted when there is no of seal of maltruthiness?

@hxhdfjifzirstc894

Ай бұрын

Jawohl! Ver is zee blaue Korrect Zots booble?

JP is correct on this issue.

Dr Peterson is correct.

As you get older you rely on instinct and patterns intuitively. Nearly everything I hear I consider to be BS…especially for many so called authority or leader….keeps me just where I wanna be!

2:25 "Drive energy cost down and we can make the third world rich" An expo in a 3rd world country featured transport vehicle technology using "distilled water" as fuel. Word spread that a "shiek" bought the invention... In the same 3rd world country taxis were "encouraged" to convert from gasoline to LPG saying that LPG is cheaper. Taxi drivers ended up with less income since they needed LPG refilling so often they ended up paying more on top of the conversion expenses which were deducted from their daily income. We need more honest people who are intelligent.

@dwwolf4636

28 күн бұрын

Distilled water has no energy content that can be accessed without first splitting it into H2 and O2. A process that requires alot of energy. LPG generally is generally cheaper at the cost of ~30% mileage per liter of fuel. Whether or not that is economically viable depends on the cost of the conversion kit and the gas/lpg costs ( which is usually a tax issue ). Some math work will determine whether or not such an exchange is economically viable. A certain % of the vehicles in a nation using LPG can be worthwhile...it produces less CO2 and other pollutants and it allows for more total fuel for a given amount of crude oil. Again economocs will stermine what is more worthwhile for an economy.

@pshehan1

10 күн бұрын

Did the sheik also buy the Brooklyn Bridge?

Some of science is nonsense obviously but to say that MOST of it is nonsense is ridiculous. But calling John Kerry Skeletor is hilarious!😂.

@drew6194

29 күн бұрын

Sadly, these days, most science is nonsense. All you need to be a scientist in this brave new world is to repeat these words: "I'm a scientist."

@pshehan1

10 күн бұрын

Peterson should know better. Name calling is not science. And he is stealing from the Hitler rants parodies where Goebbels is called Skeletor.

“Social science” 😅🤣😂😅😆

Sooooo...All the REAL Scientists, Meaning the ones that he has TALKED to AGREE with him ??? And how MANY is that ?

why? a culling.

Perfect John Kerry impersonation!!

Having working in academia and industry. Having listened and read and peer reviewed papers. I have to say most of research outcomes are nonesense, unrepeatable and dare i say just made up .

I recently saw an advertisement promoting environmentally friendly yachts. You'd think that people with enough money to buy yachts who are concerned about a climate crisis would forego the yacht altogether.

@bite-sizedshorts9635

12 күн бұрын

Why? I worked for a manufacturer that made some sail yachts.

@jimgrady8004

12 күн бұрын

@@bite-sizedshorts9635 Well then maybe you could see clear to support oil field workers whose livelihood has not received the same consideration.

Bizarre opinions delivered confidently

at the end of the day when any attempt is made to quantify the "green house effect" the result does not rise past the error bars for the data collected. it is a very simple black body problem not even close to the difficulty in determining the mas of the proton out to what number of decimals we can currently calculate but the green house effect remains immeasurable because it does not exist. the green house effect was hypothesized to solve a problem that was an observational artifact resulting from the nonexistence of a comprehensive theory of energy during the late enlightenment when the sun's "temperature" was originally calculated and found to be lacking by approximately 10% .... as now calculated 10% of the sun's output is microwaves and other types of radio noise.

"It's not replicable" He must be talking about where he went to school. What an idiot. I quit right then.

PWA audio mixing needs some work. Bass is too high, and guest audio sounds like it has reverb.

When it comes to politicians' motivation for hopping on this climate bandwagon, may i suggest, like most TV cop show dealing with fraud, conspiracies, and such like " follow the money."

Amen your right we can make a great world. But how should we replace those who hoard for only themselves? I think so yes.

I miss "Clean your bedroom, Bucko" Jordan Peterson.

Farting melts the ice caps

Most studies if not all nowadays are funded by corporations with their own interests.ya real positive innovations are not coming unless there's money to be made.sad but true

With this guy logic we are heading for destruction ! He is all over the map on everything. Crying, God , Good luck, Redemption… With his lines of thinking he could be a perfect candidate for any Corporate Position in a society where all and everything is disposable even human lives

Based

Let's make Jordan Peterson and Pierre Polievre become us citizens then make then run our government

2:32 When the poor become rich, someone else will be poor. If this isn't true, then we need an example from history, or a clear and plausible scenario.

@TheCompleteGuitarist

Ай бұрын

It is true that not everyone can be in the 1% but I am guessing he means people not dying of starvation, easily curable diseases and cold. Because food security health and stable homes themselves are wealth. Or do you think everyone should own a Ferrari?

I want that blazer

“Since the masses of the people are inconstant, full of unruly desires, passionate, and reckless of consequences, they must be filled with fears to keep them in order. The ancients did well, therefore, to invent gods, and the belief in punishment after death.” Roman historian, Polybius.

1:15 - wish I hadn’t listened to him now lol Pan Evaporation Rates

All a movie within.iam the infinite dreaming of doing stuff etc as a human being

Stupid is as stupid does.

Yep the earth is greening, there is no climate crisis

It's all about putting in more government control and restricting individual freedoms.

@theQuestion626

Ай бұрын

It has nothing to do with “putting in more government control and restricting individual freedoms“ that is basically a paranoid conspiracy theory peddled by people like Jordan Peterson and fascists. Do you want to know something funny about people like Jordan Peterson? They constantly complain about “the government“ and “restricting individual freedoms” while ignoring that the corporate state has already done this and continues to do this. But that’s not surprising because Jordan Peterson is not a scientist, he’s not a historian, he’s not an economist, he’s not a philosopher, and judging from his record he was a terrible psychologist and a terrible professor.

Social science sure ... Not hard science

Jordan Peterson puts things into perspective quickly and concisely. It takes him five minutes to say the same thing that "experts" need an hour long lecture to explain.

The rich never abide by anything that makes them poorer. They DO, however, seek to enforce it on the poor.

I have a PhD & postdoc in the medical field. It’s shocking what passes for science. Don’t get me wrong, there is some beautiful research out there, but in my humble opinion, most of it is garbage. If my field is anything to judge by, I would not be surprised that the same scenario is being played out with these climate alarmists.

But...but..... Justin Trudeau said........