Tyler tought he unlocked a W after so many Ls, just to realize it was a trap

The logic on the first L puzzle is that the 2 is adjacent to every available slot for the 4, but the 2 only had the capacity for 1 more mine, whereas the 4 needed 2 more mines to be a 5, therefore 4 was actually a 3, and you place the mine in the last available slot for the 2 that isnt adjacent to the 4.

If u click the "why" button if u fail on expert mode it will show a potential mine layout using the current information given to you, might help you to like visualize the mines

the lines of +1 and -1 at the start of your video are incredibly straight, 10/10 precision

For the one at 7:00, I dunno if you figure it out later, the 4 can't be a 5 because it'd have four mines attached to the two instead of just three, since you were confused about why it could be assumed.

Well played! Can't wait to see next episode!

My brain broke watching this. Can't understand how you actually do this.

The logic at 6:15 is the same logic at 11:30 ! The 4 was compromising the 2, meaning it had to go down instead

I hated doing the lies varient. It was a great puzzle, but my brain could heat up the room with how much I was thinking.

OK, you got me hooked. Totally up my alley, interesting new variants. Try the C ones next, they're really hard.

17:00 The hint telling is empty due to interaction btw 3 & 4. Assume '3' is 2, all adjacent it must empty as it already fulfilled. The hint box is empty. Assume '3' is 4; the r two mines left. These two mines placement will affect '4' to turn into 5. Thus to satisfy (3/4) now (4/5), the two mines must btw them. The hint box in this case empty as well. The conclusion in either both situation result in the hint box empty/safe. Why the mines no longer there bcoz like above there are two valid conclusions on the square u click can b either mine or not. But now the hint box is '0'. So (3/0) interaction concludes the 3 is 2 thus square below it empty.

He might not be the lightest one, but he definitely brings joy

@IcelyPuzzles

Жыл бұрын

lightest 🤔

Aw hell naw, that W is hell Can't wait for the next episode

I know a lot of people have said this, but I’ll see if I can state it in a more clear way. The reason that 4 had to be a three was because the 2 was there. We know that 2 has to be a 3, but anywhere you put a mine other than the bottom left square next to the 2 would make the 4 an actual 4 which we know it can’t be. You can’t put two mines adjacent to the four because the 2 is already there Because the four can’t be a four, the final mine for the 2 has to be the bottom left space.

13:15 Is the rule "Difference of 3, larger value decreases smaller value increases" ? It happened in the next puzzle too with the 4 and 1 in the corner

Minesweeper but it's cake!!

theres something really wacky about seeing people play the game

20 minutes I’m early I guess

expert mode sucks cause sometimes the way the game thinks is not how it works and makes you make a mistake for no reason

@KusaneHexaku

Жыл бұрын

have you considered the possibilities that you just missed something not saying anything, but i'd rather trust a coded game than a potentially biased human brain