I have a lot of respect for this guy. His ability to explain things in a way that allows you to really understand and not seem so abstract is a sign of true intelligence I think.. his books are even better

@g33xzi11a

7 жыл бұрын

The books by Brian Greene

@mgominasian9206

7 жыл бұрын

Madeline Monahan The Elegant Universe

@KhushiKumari-bo7sl

6 жыл бұрын

my life i am any thing see ok mr

@singdancing8

6 жыл бұрын

The Fabric of the Cosmos

@Raydensheraj

6 жыл бұрын

I'm reading the elegant Universe by him, absolutely fantastic in every way.

The signature of a good teacher is his/her ability to explain very well what he is teaching. Brian Greene has that signature!

@frankdimeglio8216

3 жыл бұрын

Einstein was a known weasel. Greene is knowingly and deceitfully lying about physics. WHY E=MC2 IS NECESSARILY F=MA (ON BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity AS SPACE ON BALANCE: TIME DILATION ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Hence, the Earth AND the Sun are CLEARLY E=MC2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE. (The sky is blue, AND the Earth is ALSO BLUE.) A PHOTON may be placed at the center of WHAT IS THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c); AS E=MC2 IS F=MA !!!; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ("Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!!) Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=mC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE !!!; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. (Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE.) E=mC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Great !!! Again, BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. By Frank DiMeglio

I think Brian's ability to communicate such concepts is awesome.

Great speaker and his book "The Elegant Universe" is legendary.

This man communicates complex concepts with remarkable clarity!

@carnellereynolds2473

9 жыл бұрын

Marcela K. Preininger It's funny, I was thinking the same thing. He must've memorized his speech and practiced several times. I also noticed that he told a few jokes that the audience didn't get. After a while he started having to explain his jokes. I guess they were too intrigued by his demonstration.

@allenev.8765

9 жыл бұрын

+Carnelle Reynolds absolutely - they have only 17 minutes for the talk. its the elevator pitch for string theory. mr. greene, i'm sure, has given this talk many times. it may be a subset of the 'elegant universe' material that brian did for nova.

@grim789

8 жыл бұрын

+Marcela K. Preininger Made me think of this quote Albert Einstein - 'If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't understand it yourself.'

@stevecreighton3352

8 жыл бұрын

+Marcela K. Preininger Brian Greene has written several books on string theory and his exceptional talent as a communicator brings string theory to everyone.....although an understanding of a little quantum theory and General relativity help! The LHC is just about to wind up to full power of about 14 TeV ( Terra electron volts ) and at these energies we may see some of it disappear into the hidden dimensions.

@shafiqifs

8 жыл бұрын

Brain Greene is actually misleading people. He was time & again asked to read the link www.linkedin.com/pulse/adopted-paradigm-physics-incorrect-shafiq-khan?trk=pulse_spock-articles before he talks about physics in any forum. Einstein was the greatest scientific trickster ever. Theories of relativity lead to Big Bang Theory whereas under Big Bang paradigm there is absolutely no possibility of existence of God for following reasons. 1. Philosophically for existence; it has to be some substance (visible, invisible, perceivable or not perceivable) and this applies to God also. Substances occupy space but there is absolutely no space for God to exist at the time of Big Bang & before. 2. Four things come out of Big Bang namely space, time, matter & light/radiation. We cannot look for eternal God in space & time as both had the beginning; secondly humans are in a position to produce all types of light/radiation and something which humans can produce could not be the God and since matter is made up of electrons, protons & neutrons these too could not be the God. However Big Bang Theory including Cosmic Inflation has been mathematically, theoretically & experimentally proved as baseless in the published paper "Experimental & Theoretical Evidences of Fallacy of Space-time Concept and Actual State of Existence of the Physical Universe" which is available at the journal site at indjst.org/index.php/indjst/issue/view/2885.

He's such a good writer; I had no idea he was also such a good speaker. Best of luck to those guys. Whether you think string theory is a valid enterprise or not, someone has to prove it either way, which is what they're doing. If they're right... what a discovery. If they're wrong... what a discovery.

@EdmundEquilibruimmentaiko

7 жыл бұрын

superstringcheese I

@nealW2904

4 жыл бұрын

A bit like proving god does or doesn’t exist do you think

@nickw9376

4 жыл бұрын

There is a principle of science that it is impossible to prove that something does not exist. Even finding an alternative theory, and being to prove it, does not prove the non-existence, or total error of the previous theory.

@nickw9376

4 жыл бұрын

@@nealW2904 To me, a lot of this stuff is like searching for a god. It has the same sort of endlessness to it....and the same problem that you can't prove the lack of something.

@rajmohan3840

4 жыл бұрын

555

Fast forward 15 years and still nothing, jury is still out.

@CuriousAndCuriouser1865

4 жыл бұрын

Just us the update?

@parkeranderson5074

4 жыл бұрын

Could they have withheld their findings?

@greenwxy344

4 жыл бұрын

PowerStrokePepe probably

@2ndrealitygaming402

4 жыл бұрын

Dyzo. Why would they do that?

@emodude35

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah CERN found absolutely no proof of extra dimensions or supersymmetry. Two String Theory failures.

Sometimes when I start to think I'm really smart I like to watch stuff like this to keep my ego grounded.

@cleocarter

3 жыл бұрын

Laughing at this at 4am.

I can only show two dimensions on the screen but some of you guys will fix that some day :)

@henrikkoberstein

5 жыл бұрын

Hehe, in some sense, Brian Greene is the Steve Jobs of physics. :D

@willwinn8559

4 жыл бұрын

Best comment of the day 😎🏆👍

@gbachich

4 жыл бұрын

holograms?

@carrerasrivera

4 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/X3l1lKiKiNaalNo.html You are welcome 2019yr

This is a fantastic summary of his book: "The elegant universe"

@frankdimeglio8216

3 жыл бұрын

Greene 💰 is knowingly and deceitfully lying about physics.

I've watched many videos on string theory but this is the first time I think I've grasped it. This guy is an excellent communicator.

Brian Greene is the total package. He’s a brilliant mathmatician,theorist,physicist,cosmologist,scientist all with the ability to explain things that would be otherwise impossible to understand. I remember watching “the elegant universe “ as a kid and being blown away.

I Didn't Know I'd End Up Watching Full Video... Amazing explanation

@dhiahassen9414

8 жыл бұрын

that always happen with "TED"

@kellynaz9256

8 жыл бұрын

same

@TheWhiteyOfDarkness

7 жыл бұрын

but many newer ones are boring in comparison with this

@AneesAhmed333

6 жыл бұрын

Akbar Raza Syed This was

@AneesAhmed333

6 жыл бұрын

newdhia hassen is that fucking guy who plays

"Today a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively..."

@hajtom6280

7 жыл бұрын

Well no, just because we are built by the same means does not mean we are the same consciousness, sorry but no.

@cedrix57

7 жыл бұрын

I am trying to understand this theory. Do you have a video or an article that explains this »we are built by the same»?

@Terra101

7 жыл бұрын

Here is Tom with the weather!

@GenoVeseMekanik

7 жыл бұрын

raptorekpl bill hicks

@markjones6358

7 жыл бұрын

That is exactly what Einstein was trying to say, if you crushed a whole lot of energy down and therefore slowed it's vibration, you would have a mass, like a doughnut or a couch or a pair of glasses but that mass would still retain the same amount of energy if the process could be reversed. The man on ACID got it right.

I'm visual. That rendering of the warping of space causing gravity made a big difference... but the ANTS made it really happen . I love this man. I love his passion! He is very clear and enjoyable to listen to. I finally understand some of this!!

he says we will know in 5, 7 , 10 years if he is right from LHC experiments. As of today, ELEVEN years have elapsed.

@alpheusOne

5 жыл бұрын

Richard Finkelstein in this dimension 🤷🏼‍♂️🤷🏼‍♂️

@jonmelon9792

5 жыл бұрын

If you think about discoveries about stuff quantum is probably being made since soon after the LHC was started. But I wouldn't be holding my breath in expectation of detailed info about these discoveries coming out anytime soon; I just t couldn't be risked that, for example,a rogue group could, possibly, potentially, however remotely, acquire enough knowledge to, for instance, unleash a maybe a tiny black hole that could destroy life as we know it,.

@MiamiUFO

5 жыл бұрын

Brian Greene is one of the merchants of hype bordering in dishonesty and milking the cow of social gullibility with fairytale physics with zero testable predictions and far detached from Reality.

@Garrstar

5 жыл бұрын

@@MiamiUFO Who else would you qualify in this group?

@MiamiUFO

5 жыл бұрын

Almost all promoters of String Theory as a "scientific theory", the people talking about "post empirical science"(very convenient when their ideas are not supported by empirical data), etc; these people are not hard to spot; their signature is hype. Some people call this fairytale Physics. It

11 years on from this video, and the Large Hadron Collider has been in use for years. As yet, I'm seeing good results (the Higgs boson), but I'm not seeing any major announcements about other dimensions or about string theory. I appreciate this guy's ability to teach with clarity, but I don't see us closer to a theory of everything. I get the impression that the right theory is simple, right in front of us, and when we finally see it, we will say "of course".

@jaapongeveer6203

5 жыл бұрын

You may know they are proposing a more massive collider in the order of 100 kms around so that higher energies can be produced to make more energetic collisions. If built it could possibly provide the evidence. Question is will 100 kms do it or 1,000 ...

The best explanation of string theory ever ❤️

Brian Greene is my favorite, love to listen him, and he always demonstrate thing visually.Easy to learn from him. Very educational.

Still after almost 2 decades, the best string theory Beautifully explained by Dr. Brian Greene

begins by talking about the year 1907 length of video- 19:07

@WalterWWelle

7 жыл бұрын

Joseph Sewell illuminati confirmed. Well done sir...

@Noth3ng

7 жыл бұрын

Joseph Sewell - though it's not as impressive as the fact that it took almost 3 years before one of those "illuminati confirmed" messages appeared in this thread.

@AlienPsyTing1

6 жыл бұрын

spooky

@miloudabouichou

6 жыл бұрын

illuminati confirmed

@jimscobie6646

6 жыл бұрын

Too coincidental!

I've used DMT several times and I'm almost positive what I experienced under its effects were these extra dimensions. In fact the visual aspects were very similar to what he showed in this video, particularly how the dimensions effect the strings. Cool stuff.

@hOREP245

2 жыл бұрын

dmt users lmao

@rivas97

2 жыл бұрын

Nice to hear, but don't touch this Stuff anymore please, Ok?! 😂😂😂

What we must always remember is that when we find the answer to the meaningful we realize how little later we know. What makes times so special as to be one and absolute? There’s always more, let’s all work together in unity and love

Its going to be a breakthrough when we prove the existence of other dimensions with particle collision and converge the ideas and theories of every scientific genius. To know we are one collision away just makes it that more exciting . We found the higgs boson particle now onward to the graviton !! Love this TED talk btw !! Very smart man.

You want to know what's trippy? Everything has gravitational pull, even humans. Our pull is small because we don't have that much mass but we emit gravitational pull regardless. So right now as you sit by your computer you are effecting space fabric. Everywhere you go and everything you do you are warping the fabric of space. Everything you do from taking a breath, to scratching your balls eventually effects everything in the universe in some way or another. By typing this right now I will eventually effect everything in the universe, even a planet hundreds of million light years away that may have a person identical to me typing this very same thing. That's not to say it will be a huge change, maybe just a displacement of a molecule or a microscopic reaction, but it's a change nonetheless.

@hector-m-carrillo

9 жыл бұрын

Yes, that is gravity in a nut shell

@isaiahphillip4112

9 жыл бұрын

Nope, you won't effect anything you don't directly touch. Unless you're in space, all other forces are superior to gravity. Not even the earth's gravity can dislodge an atom. If there was no nuclear attractions, or friction, and you stood still for a few weeks, you might notice small objects have made the smallest of movements towards you. But that is not the case, the light waves that just bounced off of you and back into outer space will have more of an effect on something than your gravity.

@hector-m-carrillo

9 жыл бұрын

Isaiah Phillip well, in theory, we never touch anything, it's just a repulsion between electrons we feel Regardless, what the guy is trying to say is that we apply a 1x10^-99999 N (not real number, in other words, tiny) force on every object in the universe simply because we exist And if there were no nuclear attractions (which by I presume you mean electric forces) we would return to a singularity point, since there is nothing pushing us out and we'd all collapse onto ourselves

@hector-m-carrillo

9 жыл бұрын

Having re read his comment, I forfeit my defense towards him, but my corrections stand

So much easier to listen to Mr Greene, than actually doing the math... oh my brain hurts...

@WSCLATER

5 жыл бұрын

Easy to listen to because he is talking so much bullshit. You don't really need to pay attntion to it

@MsMissyinMissouri

5 жыл бұрын

@@WSCLATER Maybe you think it's bullshit from your perspective because you can't wrap your mind around it.

Excellent. Very easy to understand with his perfect delivery.

The world needs people like him

How'd the experiment go?

@ryzimski5749

9 жыл бұрын

Norbit CleaverHook They did one, if space could tear, an einsteinian law if I am not mistaken, says that space can be warped, but not torn, they relatively recently did a calculation in which the first few times they mucked up the solved it correctly, the answer inferred that space could be torn if of course string theory was right.

@scottdylanwoolf

9 жыл бұрын

+FrankCoffman lol you are nowhere near educated enough to make that kind of assumption but everyone has the right to their own opinion no matter how bad.

@DarkenRaul1

9 жыл бұрын

FrankCoffman This article you posted is from 2007. The scientists at CERN have discovered the Higgs Boson last year. This proves that the mathematical theories of String Theory are accurate as their experimentation meet their projected calculations. We have the Standard Model of Fundamental Particles because of String Theory, and as time goes on, we are finding more and more particles that we are expecting to find from this theory. If this theory is wrong, then why are we keep finding good results and able to make practical use from it under the assumption it is correct? Now I will admit that my level of understanding of physics isn't high enough yet to fully understand String Theory (still an undergraduate in college), but from my understanding, this is new stuff that the scientific community is just starting to accept as fact in an age where all physics textbooks are wrong, as Michio Kaku points out, because they all say "The Universe is mainly made out of atoms," when we know that about 96 percent of it is Dark Matter and Dark Energy.

@benjaminmoldrup6286

9 жыл бұрын

+FrankCoffman Let's presume you are right. If string theory is wrong, which science always will stay open to, it will not really do any harm to have tested it. It's not like creationism which is plain stupid because it's based on an old unscientific book, this is resting on and derived from the body of science. I mean, it must be the best current explanation since a lot of very smart people, who understand stuff that you and i don't, dedicate their time and carrier to it. Even if not all physicists agree with it, it is still unwise to dismiss it before giving it a fair trial. AND if it turns out to be wrong, some smart people would have spent their time, thinking about a major theory for some time for a scientific reason, and i don't really see how that is a problem. If you have any VALID argument for ridiculing the super-string-theory, bring them on. I don't think you have.

@benjaminmoldrup6286

9 жыл бұрын

I agree, noone should present something unproved as a fact. :) I hope the research will teach us something, and i'm 99% confident they will eventually find a solution to the problems from which the string-theory arose. But you seem like you have been following the development on this issue a little, do you know where to view some of the test results?

Brian Greene is really an amazing teacher

No extra dimensions in LHC by 2017. No supersymmetric particles, and there should be at 1-14 TeV energies.

I think Ant-Man actually showed the Calabi-Yau Manifolds in the last "subatomic" scene

I'll have another drink, maybe I understand it better!

@alexkije

5 жыл бұрын

And some popcorn!

@boutchie06

5 жыл бұрын

I was thinking the same. I would like to do some LSD and listen to this vid again.

@drrydog

4 жыл бұрын

rather a bottle in front of me, than a frontal lobotomy

@georgeedward602

4 жыл бұрын

Three years later, but I noticed the comment for a reason I think. Drop acid and you will see it clearly. Maybe only in your own head but what an experience.

@georgeedward602

4 жыл бұрын

@Seditia Rose Dude just noticed your reply. I am late to the party.

Showing graphics of something that exists in 10+1 dimensions, and talking about finding out "what these things look like", does that even make sense? From the animations it looks like these 11 dimensions are just things existing in three dimensions but on a really small scale. If they operate in all 11 dimensions I guess they could be "seen" in our three dimensions of space too, but. Can these strings really be visualised? Does it even matter what they look like? I'm confused.

I have always wondered how these people who think about such principles are then able to switch their mind to the mundane such as a grocery list, sorting laundry, and such.

@CarMake

4 жыл бұрын

They don't. that's for people like you to do

@vmodsm

4 жыл бұрын

They don’t

@kevinjohnson8016

4 жыл бұрын

Because they're desperate to deny God

@ProfessorJayTee

4 жыл бұрын

@@kevinjohnson8016 Because are not handicapped by the need to hypothesize that there is a god in order to explain things in our universe. That outdated and unsupported hypothesis has some fatal flaws in it, anyhow.

@RolandKarlBryce

4 жыл бұрын

Kevin Johnson they actually believe there is a Gode, sorry I mean a Code... the creator’s Code

This is the clearest talk this guy ever did. Nothing later really compares.

"..i can only show 2 dimensions on the screen, some of you guys will fix that one day.."

@Shadow77999

5 жыл бұрын

Lol

@ajk9420

5 жыл бұрын

Shadow747 is it vr?

@Shadow77999

5 жыл бұрын

@@ajk9420 yes

In the Big Bang Theory, Sheldon looks down on Brian Greene.

That was 2008. Now it's 2019, 11 years later. So? What's the answer? And if he is right, what about it? What're the practical implications?

@SaithMasu12

5 жыл бұрын

They couldnt find anything in matter that relates to the String Theory so far. Thats the current standing. Usually the approach is: Physics suspect to find something and then they go and look for it. If they find traces of it they look further until their theory is proven.

@iceboorg9737

5 жыл бұрын

It's impossible for us humans to find or understand more than 3 dimensions.

@kirkwolschleger4468

5 жыл бұрын

It was 2005...uploaded 2008

I think he was talking about the hadron collider at the end of the video that discovered the god particle (Higgs Boson Particle) in 2012.

The Demosthenes of 21st Century physics..what a powerful communicator

I just had an idea. I know I am not very smart at this type stuff but maybe this explains black holes? ok so if the proton collider gets particles to crash into each other at nearly the speed light and you have less of material to begin with it will mean some of the material went into a different dimension. Just a thought but Maybe black holes are so strong they get light particles to crash into each other and instead of getting some of the matter to "push through" are dimension like the proton collider does...a black hole actually a punches a hole in our dimension? We know that some matter that goes into a black hole disappears and cant be accounting for , so does black holes prove that we have many dimensions?

I love brian greene, he has an incredible mind. 👏

My particle is a circle. When this circle started to curl around itself its form changed. Now it has volume and looks like a sphere. What is the law between particle’s volume and energy? I think: big volume - low energy, small volume - high energy. The more speed / impulse--> the more particle (as a volume) compress--> the more energy . And when the speed decrease - - the energy decrease too - but the volume of particle will increase. My particle behaves like ‘ a springy circle’ (!) This springy circle can curl into small sphere which must have volume and therefore can be describe as a ‘stringlike particle with vibrations’ only approximately . Springy particle - it means the particle is able to spring back into its former position. In my opinion this is the meaning of ‘ The Law of mass/energy conservation and transformation’ ======== Once more. Quantum of light has potential energy (- E=Mc^2 ). When it starts to curl around its diameter the potential energy (- E=Mc^2 ) is hidden and we can observe its electronic energy ( E=h*f). But there is situation when this hidden potential energy goes out and we can see its great active power ( + E=Mc^2 ) looking the destroyed cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In my opinion the particle’s transformation from one state into the other was legalized as ‘ The Law of mass/energy conservation and transformation’. # Different geometrical forms of string particle ( open - closed ), different frequencies of string particle are reason of different radiation (from ultraviolet to infrared ), are also reason of new situation in 2D. Now the surface of my 2D in local area is changed. On one hand it is electromagnetic field now, on the other hand the spinning electron changed the temperature of the surface in local area. Now this local area has Debye temperature: Q(d)= h*f(max) / k. Maybe in this space a grain of gravity theory is hidden. Who knows? ==================.. My conclusion. It is no bad idea to ask question: what are physical parameters of every new super D? It is possible to understand many things using 2D. The missing ‘big idea’ in ‘String theory’ is hidden in the simple question: ‘ What was the form of particle before it started to curl?’ The time appears as a period of electron’s action. I ‘mix bosons with fermions’ (page 105) without using any supersymmetries. And I have: a) In potential state the impulse of particle is h = 0. ( boson) b) Having Planck’s inner impulse (unit h=1) my particle moves straight with constant speed c=1. ( photon) c) Having Goudsmit / Uhlenbeck inner angular impulse h * = h /2pi. the particle rotates around its diameter. ( electron/ tachyon/ fermion). Maybe the different conditions of (h) is the key to all other phenomena. Maybe this process can explain ‘the dualism of particle.’ Maybe this interpretation can explain where the energy comes from. Maybe, if the space of my circle curls and changes then we need to use Riemann geometry . Maybe, if the speed of the particle is independent and self-contained then we need to use nonlinear equations. Maybe . . . . . Maybe it is time to end now. I reread my article. It is not bad, not bad for amateur, who thinks about philosophy of physics for 28 years. Of course, my interpretation is only scheme. And if I were a physicist I would make from this scheme a theory '' Elementary particle as a membrane-circle = pi = 3,1415 . . . . ''.

I'm just curious about why these other dimensions all have to be so SMALL that we can't see them with our eyes or other currently created observational technology? Is there the possibility that they are so LARGE that we can't observe them? Like how at one point we thought the Earth was flat because we couldn't observe the curvature of the Earth. There could be some obvious reason that I'm missing - science and mathematics aren't my strong suit - but if anyone cares to explain this to me I'd appreciate it :).

@Souledgex1

10 жыл бұрын

The dimensions are small because we are looking deeper into the particles of the particles within an atom. Greene explained how there's a machine in which scientists are colliding particles to observe the results of the collisions. This video was five years ago. In 2012, scientists discovered the Higgs Boson, which is the result of these collisions, so indeed the dimensions are small.

@ireneabraham906

7 жыл бұрын

Scientists have universally agreed to expect 11 dimensions around us - 10 dimensions of space and one of time. We know 3 of us space and the 1 of time already leaving 7 dimensions of space unknown to us. The size of these dimensions are immaterial if I am not wrong. Dimensions are not bound by physical targets. It is the features and characteristics that matter. A line (2D) can be long or short. Height can be tall or short. Time can be measured but it is not bounded. Hope you get the point :)

@rohit28agrawal

7 жыл бұрын

Samantha McCall we already have 3 dimensions explaining Newtonian physics...All we r looking for is 1 equation to explain the entire physics...newtonian as well as quantum. so whatever new discovery/ theory is there will be from the quantum side...so if there exist any extra dimension it has to be of quantum scale. i hope i answered your query :)

@sinsemiliasam14

6 жыл бұрын

Samantha McCall maybe they are vibrating at such a different vibration of our own we can't see them. we can only see about a 3rd or 13th of observable light, correct? so maybe they are here or around us and just at a different vibration. idk that's my beat guess

@flateartcreatorssolja6558

6 жыл бұрын

Samantha McCall earth is flat hun

8 years & still waiting for the result!!

@shukracharya_

6 жыл бұрын

Ahmed Yousuf results is higs bosan

@dbrast

6 жыл бұрын

It's now been 13 years since the video was made. That was in 2005. It's now 2018,

@VestigialHead

5 жыл бұрын

+ Ahmed Yousuf It may be 50 or 100 years before you have your answer. Do not be impatient. Science is not like that.

@mervynsookun5995

5 жыл бұрын

Black hole or arsehole ?

@waynereinert787

5 жыл бұрын

@@VestigialHead so true! Also, what says that our perception of time is only because of 1 definition. 10 years in our earth time is only a slight fraction of time if we get to Mars, their definition has to be different and that's just using our fundamental measurement system.

Fascinating video! But it's funny that they explain gravity with the example of heavy balls on a canvas, distorting the canvas because they weigh. Basically they are explaining gravity with... gravity :)

@zomuanpuiazadeng929

5 жыл бұрын

Good insight! But, I have to disagree with you. Its just the way Einstein n co explained that space time is a fabric and can be warped by the presence of objects. It may be like water too, still its warped because of their presence, not gravity per se.

He gave this talk in 2005 (three years before it was posted here). So now (2019), it has been 14 years since he enthused that "it's very exciting that in the next five years or so we may be able to test for the existence of these extra dimension." (16:35) It's amazing how undetectable these supposed extra dimensions are. It's almost like they don't exist. ; )

@andreab380

4 жыл бұрын

Alas! In the first twenty years of my life, up to about 10 years ago, physics looked like some amazing Holy Grail of human knowledge. They were really persuaded that we were so closed to basically explaining Everything. As experiments accumulated, untestable theories, holes, and more untestable theories to fill the gaps seemed to multiply. It was so exciting before, but now it starts to look like they're bullshitting their way out of a dead end...

*How life began in the universe:* One little string wanted to be more than just another string. He wanted to be recognized by his kin. He wanted to make the most beautiful music, he wanted to play in the largest of theaters of Broadway. He wanted to be a string on a violin so he could resonate his vibrations into the world and all would know his uniqueness. So he started a club in which many other talented strings joined and together they made molecules. Many types of molecules, even biological molecules! After millenia of dilligent work and concentration they made their first self-replicating molecule: DNA. The rest of the story is called evolution by natural selection ^^

@anjamo2307

5 жыл бұрын

Jimi Hendrix?

Maybe it's just me but I don't find the "spatial valley" model of gravity all that satisfying. The idea is that material bodies warp space and attract other bodies because of that curvature. Doesn't this already rely on our intuitions about how things "roll down hills", though? In other words, the intuitive explanation of gravity appeals to examples that already operate with some kind of folk-gravitational model. The question remains: why do bodies react at all to the bending of space?

@jorgepeterbarton

10 жыл бұрын

Yes. I see tons of comments about 'you can't explain gravity with gravity' and waited a long time before it was actually explained to me properly. But still coupled with a good explanation it works pretty well as a model, however the true explanation is dumbed down too much (i don't mean we have to go indepth into equations either) so it causes confusion especially in the poor explanation on the video. Its space-time, not just space for a start. its actually 3d plus time in reality. i prefer a rollercoaster track or something, with a rolercoaster that never stops moving-it never stops moving because it has to be going through time or space...and this is space-time....it hits a corner and has to turn that corner (the track being space-time), but also it has to move towards that corner it can't stop...well still not enough dimensions of course(because really you can't), and lacking geometry because of the predetermined path, but its an alternative analogy. and i probably have confused people more.

@jorgepeterbarton

10 жыл бұрын

***** those are better. Also how about those Gifs of waves of particles in a liquid/gas, they manage well enough to describe their concept. A 3D picture just describing the warp by density of some dots (coordinates) would be an improvement, introducing up and down is the whole problem with the video's model.

@Mysteroo

10 жыл бұрын

I'm with you. Even *****'s pictures seem to still rely on some sort of basic understanding of how physics work. Things kinda slide down curves - in this case not because of gravity, but to cause gravity. But this still pretty much seems like it relies on physics to cause a law of physics to work- circular reasoning. So much of this is still theoretical and we're just kind of testing hypotheses out with other hypotheses. I could almost see there being a fourth dimension or even a fifth, but ten? It really seems like they're just scrounging for ways to make their ideas work at this point. Some people look at this kind of science and reassure themselves that religion is outdated superstition, but I look at so much that we don't know and that doesn't make sense and it reassures me that there's probably something supernatural that's holding it all together. Otherwise so much just doesn't make sense

@thelol77

10 жыл бұрын

Mysteroo Movies Ehh I mean I agreed with that until you jumped to the supernatural. Seems like a classic argument from ignorance to me. Sure a lot of it is just fitting data to theories, but that's what science has always been. It's only this theoretical because, at least I think, we don't yet know enough about the "frame of reference" for all this stuff, conceptually. At this point everything that's known about quantum and theoretical physics seems to be based on predictions. Hypotheses have falsifiable predictions and they work. That's always been the core of science. So I agree with you that it might not "make sense" yet, but that doesn't mean the evidence isn't there. Just not enough is known yet to put it together in a coherent and explanatory treatise. And even if we can never know, I don't think the supernatural elucidates any of this. That's just putting a name on the unknown and I don't think it's very useful. The second we do that is the second we concede that further investigation is basically useless. And any kind of non-physical "mind" out there seems just as absurd as many of the outlandish theories of string theory and quantum mechanics.

@marcellisrobinson

10 жыл бұрын

You need to read a physics textbook to get a handle on this. If you can't handle the math, then there's no chance you'll understand. In the realm of celestial mechanics, Einstein's theory of general relativity has passed every test thus far. Are you familiar with the "principle of least action"? Do you know what a geodesic is?

I'm not sure who this guy is, but he does an excellent job of explaining very complicated concepts. I'm seriously blown away, I hope he is a teacher somewhere

@patrikv.7103

3 жыл бұрын

He is a professor at Columbia University

He's so young! This is old but the theory still holds plus so much more.

Now it's 10 years after his explanation ! Is any proofs we got from the HLC machine? And what happens if we apply gravitational waves into string theory?

Super cool guy. Saw him live yesterday at the Starmus festival. Also looks just the same, maybe he is time traveler.

@neilAneerGAmAI

7 жыл бұрын

He also used the same animations to show how gravity warp space-time.

@captain6876

3 жыл бұрын

I also saw him yesterday at brazzers

@neilAneerGAmAI

3 жыл бұрын

@@captain6876 I am sure you did!

all these are explained in detail in Brian Green's book 'The Elegant Universe', it seems that the maths for this theory is particularly tough so they're looking for workarounds

@mohsenraghian210

4 жыл бұрын

Jim Baggott book "Fairytale Physics"

And this is just one more example of how Brian Greene hooks the general public on physics and science like he did to me many years ago.

It’s been 11 years, is there a sequel to this video

@nasrallahbeydoun

4 жыл бұрын

Not yet. I will check again after 11 years.

@jdburns1384

4 жыл бұрын

They are waiting for the James Webb telescope to launch to ensure every human possible vantage post can be high alert B.O.L.O. for ANY extra dimensions trying to hide still.....'Not Today Satin'

@davidburns1753

4 жыл бұрын

My question exactly. Part two please!! Wondering too, when the religions of the world will step in and claim that their God is the String Builder. Sorry, could not help myself.

@maxmoseley7490

4 жыл бұрын

David Burns what would be wrong with saying that God is the string builder? Logically speaking, Christians or other religions believe that God made the universe. They don’t explain how he made it or how it works. That doesn’t mean it’s false, right? If string theory is true that doesn’t disprove God. Just because the Bible never said the earth wasn’t flat but spherical, that doesn’t mean that the Bible is wrong because it never said that the earth wasn’t spherical. Same principle for this in my opinion. If string theory is the most logical explanation for laws of the universe, seems to me that that’s just how God designed it to work. I just don’t think the concepts of science and God are mutually exclusive. In fact, the fact that everything is so orderly and logical seems to point more towards an intelligence than not in my opinion. Anywhozzles😂im sure you weren’t looking for a rebuttal.

@davidburns1753

4 жыл бұрын

Definitely not looking for a rebuttal, but I accept it willingly. It allows me to ponder this about myself, "In order for me to know how little I know, wouldn't I have to know something?" ... not 'believe' in something, but actually 'know', as in scientifically provable repeatedly, not assumed because there's a Sky Fairy, cheers!@@maxmoseley7490

I'm here because like most, I'm also a curious Human being.

@TheDavid771

5 жыл бұрын

quick question Azuli

@chuckschillingvideos

4 жыл бұрын

Curiosity is good. But curiosity without skepticism is not.

@captain6876

3 жыл бұрын

You are a girl, you cannot feel curious

Man, Brian Greene is a Feynman level orator and explainer. I’d take him over Tyson any day

@onggi3388

5 жыл бұрын

and now u are fucked for saying that !

Brian Greene makes this so interesting & understandable to us ordinary folk.👽Thx Brian

" With no strings attached, they're still stringing you along! "

@mohsenraghian210

4 жыл бұрын

Jim Baggott book "Fairytale Physics"

Thank you for sharing this awesome info. Not an area of my interest originally, BUT I've felt that there are more dimensions than we initially see, and so it is most satisfying to get this information clarified it actually makes it easier even on a spiritual level. Thank you very much.

@pereraddison932

4 жыл бұрын

... yrs ... GOD BLESS EVERYONE BLESS EVERYTHING ALWAYS AMEN*XOX*the ROCK OF PHAGES ...

I can keep listening to him forever without getting tired of it and still understand all of it

I was thinking about a way to reconcile string theorie with our model of the world. I thought i had an original idea but now i found out that idea is called super string theorie. For a few moments i thought i was one of this world greatest thinkers. But i apparently some great scientist already thought of that. Turning myself into a legend is much harder than i thought...

The creators of Stranger Things must be big fans of Brian Greene.

is anyone thinking of Antman right now...i do

@thetimelords911

7 жыл бұрын

haha me. I think the subatomic part of the movie even showed the Calabi-Yau manifolds!

@istvansipos9940

5 жыл бұрын

kinda. I am thinking of the Wasp

@Shadow77999

5 жыл бұрын

Lol

@aaroncurtis8545

5 жыл бұрын

That comment is even more relevant 3 years later, 😄

I'm here because I wanted to learn more about sting theory.

0:16 Goethe said that "Time is a dimension."

@GlitteringFishscale

4 жыл бұрын

He's talking about spatial dimensions

@reinman1987cancer

3 жыл бұрын

Time is considered a dimension isnt it?

@sherlockholmeslives.1605

3 жыл бұрын

@@reinman1987cancer Einstein said that time is a dimension too, in his special theory of relativity.

This is an invitation to see an artist theory of the physics of ‘time’ as a physical process. In this theory the extra dimensions of String Theory and parallel universes of Hugh Everett Many worlds interpretation are just future possibilities and opportunities in our one three dimensional Universe of continuous energy exchange or what I like to call continuous creation!

Who'd of thought windows media player visuals were the answer all along.

Brian Greene is a very articulate theoretical physicists and communicator of physics for people like me, who may be lacking knowledge in that regard. I am kind of sentimental in that I like the periodic table of elements, because essentially elements have character, and when combined to make molecules, elements have even greater character. Most everythiing I know life and non life can be explained by elements. So while the Standard Model making up the fundamental particles and forces of nature is impressive and an impressive accomplishment, somehow I felt a beauty was lost when it emerged. These days dealing with String Theory, fields, and halograms I feel we are moving to a much colder place.

Man, Brian Green has a knack for reminding you that there is no sales pitch more insane than physics.

12:22 "If there's a tiny civilization of green people walking about" *He's talking about the Minish OMG*

It is the year 2019. How did this experiment go?

@dimator

5 жыл бұрын

The LHC has not revealed hidden dimensions, unfortunately. It has made lots of other discoveries, but not along string theory.

@davids.688

5 жыл бұрын

There's a movie about this very experiment he's describing called PARTICLE FEVER - on Netflix, I believe (at least, it was a few years ago when I watched it). To my recollection, it doesn't discover or unveil these extra dimensions, but it does chronicle the discovery/proof of the existence of the Higgs-Boson particle, the so-called (and so-feared) "God particle." For a documentary about a topic most people would find tedious and boring, it's actually a well-paced and rather suspenseful film; and like Dr. Greene, it makes an enormously complex topic very accessible to those of us for whom such topics are above our intellectual pay grade. Give it a watch - if you like this TED talk, I'd be surprised if you didn't find PARTICLE FEVER equally compelling. Cheers!

@someonlinevideos

5 жыл бұрын

David S. Thanks for recommending! I couldn’t find it on Netflix but it’s on Amazon Prime Video for free for me. Watching now.

@Benzknees

5 жыл бұрын

They’re stringing it along. All governed by the equation no conclusions yet = more grants = rich scientists.

@someonlinevideos

5 жыл бұрын

Benzknees love the pun. Is there any way to verify this doubt. Not to be rude but what gives you the ability to say that a fundamental theory is just being strung along for funding?

amazing presentation, so helpful to non-physicists like me trying to understand - up to a point- how this world functions beyond the obvious. thanks.

My hypothesis states without violating any known physics laws, that the big bang is really a singularity phenomena of a master Spiral Galaxy emitting singularities from which our reality has been created as Trajectories with Spins, the universal basic geometry of energy! A String

vibrating strings of energy. that seems interesting, then what causes it to vibrate? what exactly is vibrating?

@donlowell

8 жыл бұрын

+Anoop Toffy "what causes it to vibrate?" I am going to try to answer that. Answer: energy. Somewhere I got the concept of what happens inside a quark (2 up quarks and 1 down quark makes a proton) is the most radical lightening storm you could ever image. Also, I got the concept somewhere of what goes on in each of our cells (muscle, skin, etc.). Molecules are zipping around fast and furious. Not like the images that you see everything moving slowly along. Things in the sub-atomic level works different than our everyday experiences. That would be my pseudo-intellectual answer.

@donlowell

8 жыл бұрын

GReaperEx, thanks for doing some research. Now, if Richard Feynman couldn't explain what energy was to any satisfaction, why are you asking joe blow on the Internet that question?

@donlowell

8 жыл бұрын

GReaperEx, In 1928, Paul Dirac predicted the possibility of anti-electrons based on theoretical evidence. In 1928, would you have discounted this whole notion of anti-matter? I think you would. You wouldn't be alone. Positrons were discovered in 1932 and Dirac received the Nobel Prize in 1933. One case in a million. Most theories go in the trash can. So what? Are you going to fault every scientist for working on theories that you have not a clue if it's right or wrong. I still don't understand why this theory bothers you.

@NadaII

8 жыл бұрын

+GReaperEx Modern science is to pompous to admit they are delving into what they used to call 'pseudo-science' or 'mysticism' to find answers. Nikola Tesla said,. "If you want to find the secrets of the Universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration." but what made out to be a nut. If you go through the history if scientific discovery you find that all the big names speak highly of ancient teachings, but of course this is rarely, if ever, mentioned these days. Look up the Vedas or Vedic science and see how many scientists attest to their teachings.

@MarcosFMolina

8 жыл бұрын

+Anoop Toffy >>vibrating strings of energy >>what exactly is vibrating? Energy. >>what causes it to vibrate? Energy Energy is the capacity of a physical system to perform work.

It would not answer the why question at all! It would merely push the question one step further - why the shape of the extra dimensions is the why it is? It's an infinitely regressive question.

@gavincleland3338

10 жыл бұрын

That's science, for you.

@Linkoftime2005

10 жыл бұрын

Why is subjective. Science offers us How instead and we all decide for ourselves Why it happened How it happened. With a higher definition of How, we can make better conclusions as to Why.

@miks8

10 жыл бұрын

Derick Brown Thats fair enough, but I believe that in such presentations it is disingenuous to assert that there will be anything like one and only, clear answer to the Why question.

@isodoublet

10 жыл бұрын

You can say that energy is conserved because it is, or you can use Noether's theorem and notice that it is because the laws of physics don't change with time. Which of the two explanations is more satisfactory?

@miks8

10 жыл бұрын

gogerychwyrndrobwll And does that answer Why "the laws of physics don't change with time" ? No. Here you would also say - they don't change, because they don't. It was just put into a more detailed perspective, but no matter how far you stretch this chain at the end of it you will always two things - A. a statement that something is, because it is. B. a question of why is it the way it is? It is by definition inescapable.

I'm grateful for his talks, because his books are over my head.

Wow he's such a great speaker and explained it pretty good.

@pintificate

6 жыл бұрын

Yes. For those with limited curiosity.

Everything I ever wanted to know about string theory, I learned from "Quantum Leap." Oh, and my cat has a good grasp on string theory as well.

Apart from the physics - your English is exceptional good. I would like to see your video-clips used in school in my (Germany) country.

@1BeGe

4 жыл бұрын

Well...English is his first/main language. It would be rather disconcerting if he didn't speak it well.

@captain6876

3 жыл бұрын

@@1BeGe I find his precise elaborations very comprehensive.

@7:34 “Some of you will fix that one day” - Loved that. We at least have VR now, holograms one day.

Clear explanation of the unexplicable. Now I finally understand what scientists are talking about. BUT what seems clearer to me is that our universe has only three spatial dimentions linked to time. It is interpenetrated by another three-dimentional universe linked to another time (vibrating in other frequencies), which is interpenetrated by another one linked to another time (vibrating in other frequencies) and so on. Maybe far more than ten interpenetrated universes.

Where was this guy when I was taking organic chemistry in college??

Pure Brilliance Dr Green!!!, perfect 👌

I've noticed that the dualities of the 5 string theories are similar to the dualities of the 5 Platonic solids: The 5 Platonic solids have 2 pairs of dual "objects" and one "object" that is dual to itself - the cube is dual to the octahedron, the dodecahedron is dual to the icosahedron, and the tetrahedron is dual to itself. The 5 string theories also have 2 pairs of dual "objects" and one "object" that is dual to itself - the SO(32) is dual to the E8xE8, the type IIA is dual to the type IIB, and the type I is dual to itself. I don't know that this means anything of real interest, but I'm neither a physicist or a mathematician, just an interested layman. This just seems to me to be a bit too specific to be nothing but coincidence, but maybe that's all it is.

This guy has perfect voice and teaching style for a teacher. 👍

@rock-tk1qf

5 жыл бұрын

Teachers are selected by Degrees ! Not by voice & styles

Thank you , great video.😊

Every word is of importance. Great speech.

At last! Now I understand string theory! Very clearly explained.

Dr. Greene at my college regarding String Theory & gravitational waves, phenomenal lecturer

I don't want ot alarm you but 2008 was 8 years ago.

@bladeinyoface

8 жыл бұрын

+treebeard 11* This talk was in 2005. He is a LIAR!!!!!!!!! COME SJW's LET'S UNITE AND BRING DOWN TED TALKS!!!

@iwnunn7999

6 жыл бұрын

extinct my mind is blown!!

After such a mindblowing lecture and other equally impressive videos about how the universe works, thinking about religion - specifically Genesis - just seems so laughably elementary, so stupid, so out of place, that it completely loses its credibility to occupy even a neuron of thought in my brain when thinking about the grand scheme of how the universe works.

@abbadumbotron

10 жыл бұрын

You just sound pretentious. People who believe that religion has no benefits or reasons for existence are just as close minded as the religious fanatics that attempt to deny scientific facts. These readings created thousands of years ago offer no value to you because you only observe them at face value and through literal interpretation. You don't stop to think about the insight gained from learning more about ourselves through the past, how we used to behave and how we have changed. Like what string theory implies with dimensions, the usefulness of religion and religious texts is tucked away, hidden, and overshadowed by immediate observations.

@starvetodeath123

10 жыл бұрын

Perhaps, but if you want to argue that religion has caused more good than bad, that's where you'll run into a lot of difficulties. What difference does it make that people derive insight from learning about the past if that insight is equally responsible for them strapping bombs to themselves and blowing up a mall, or committing genocide? No one does that for string theory because there are mathematical derivations to do the arguing for us.

@abbadumbotron

10 жыл бұрын

I wasn't arguing that religion has caused more good than bad, that's something I feel is subjective in most cases. What I was arguing is that there is something to be gained in anything from any perspective, as non-eloquent as that sounds. For example, Christianity can provide more than just what the belief system gives. It can teach us more about who we are and where we come from, giving insight into why we hold beliefs and what our desires are. Just because something has caused pain and suffering doesn't mean there cannot be good found in it. My point is that anyone who values knowledge and insight should not claim that anything is unworthy of occupying a neuron in one's mind, because you can always learn.

@jscott1000

10 жыл бұрын

I agree with you that the Genesis story is laughable. Much of it was borrowed from earlier texts and largely plagiarized anyway. But there is scientific evidence to support the fact that nearly all human civilizations have some sort of religion... belief in an afterlife is an adaptation of the human brain unable to deal with the notion of it's own mortality. There is a center of the human brain devoted to belief in it's own immortality. Doesn't mean that it's true, only that most people believe it's true. Me personally I will believe what the evidence suggests and not the million year old religious notion encoded into my monkey brain.

@zomuanpuiazadeng929

5 жыл бұрын

Understandable, guess you might have gone through what I went through in my 30s, trying to get my papers published and think I know everything and never realise that Science,as a scientist/doctor, is also a belief system. Now, I have openned up my mind to the idea that the Bible is not a scientific book and just tries to teach us about Jesus. And the line where 'Where were you when God stretched out the heavens?..' written centuries before Christ seems to indicate or agree with the expanding universe and the creationists' view, not that i believe it a hundred percent. But, makes you wonder, doesnt it ? Please, forgive me if i sound rude. Peace!

The problem with string theory starts with its motivation - Unification. More specifically with preConceived ideas of what Unification looks like. Unification is the correct goal if the subject can be unified. It is a very bad goal if that is not the case. Try to unify Cuisine (recipes for cookies etc) and the thermonuclear reactions in the Sun. Read my theory to understand how the adoption of the correct paradigm, you can simplify our understanding.

He is excellent at communicating and passionate. I could listen to him for hours.

@pintificate

6 жыл бұрын

And be no smarter at the end of it.

Who would dislike the video? I know Trolls, dam you Trolls.

@onyx2k206

7 жыл бұрын

+Ricardo Beltran Muslims did it

@nadiahussain1446

7 жыл бұрын

Onyx 2K you did it

@bohemis09

7 жыл бұрын

FrankCoffman did it

@mattcrossley6944

6 жыл бұрын

Flat Earthers...

So do the particles lose energy at CERN

@ShudiadWaiyantun

7 жыл бұрын

lu see don't mind me.. Just waiting for answer together with you..

@mohsenraghian210

4 жыл бұрын

@@ShudiadWaiyantun Jim Baggott book "Fairytale Physics"

my ultimate question until now is what is the composition of life... can "life" be made inside a lab? if so, then is it like an energy that mixes with the same "strings" to make it "alive"?

I am uneducated, but this guy kept my interest and made me want to learn more, he is an excellent speaker, and science needs more of that, to keep people interested...

@theodoresweger4948

5 жыл бұрын

The hallmark of a good teacher, make the students want to learn, if not they will memorize just long enough for the test.