Magnus so casually destroys players I will never be able to beat. It's absurd trying to quantify how incredibly good he is. If I live long enough, I hope to play a variation known as the Carlsen and reminisce to my grandchildren how I used to watch the great maestro play on KZread.

@michakasprzak7528

Жыл бұрын

"Grandpa, what is youtube?" "Ah, yes, I forgot you don't know what free speach is..." it be like that

@cartilagethesecond

Жыл бұрын

​@@michakasprzak7528 let's hope you are wronf

@mikecantreed

Жыл бұрын

There are lots of players at the 2800 level. Magnus isn’t special for beating an IM at blitz. Casually destroying hikaru would make him special.

@jasonuerkvitz3756

Жыл бұрын

@@mikecantreed I didn't mention the 2800 level. And certainly beating an IM doesn't make MAGNUS special. Everything else about his chess career does. It seems the spirit of your comment missed the point I was making entirely.

@Basicx951

Жыл бұрын

Step one find a woman

Magnus got so much better at streaming; commentating on the play, drawing the arrows to show options, interacting with chat. 💯

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

complete package

@Unpug

Жыл бұрын

I know right

His opponent played very well.

Love how he multitasks while playing a guy ranked over 2800.

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

❤️

I always wonder how GMs 3 min Blitz games seem so longer even talking and analysing moves along with talking to chat, while my own games often seems to vaporize so quickly without any of multitasking; even before I am able to finish off my opponents in completely good positions... Its so frustrating to keep losing on time in good positions..

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

they've been trained to do that, even as there's no time pressure

@himantasaikia8724

Жыл бұрын

@@chessmath_ indeed..

@SimplyChess_

Жыл бұрын

because they just don't consider senseless moves; most often they see the right move instantly; it was trained in their childhood so it's not they're working hard during the game

@himantasaikia8724

Жыл бұрын

@@SimplyChess_ thanks for the words.

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

@@SimplyChess_ 👍🏻

Magnus' so effortlessly brilliant

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

He's goat

@chessyoshi8626

Жыл бұрын

The effort happened well before he had an audience.

@Rspknlikeab0ssxd

Жыл бұрын

@@chessyoshi8626 this is true

@exga313

Жыл бұрын

Looking effortless takes a lot of effort,

@imd8GTr7

Жыл бұрын

Effortlessly dispatching everyone in his path.

Nothing like that Age 4 move

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

Yeaah❤️

@ass-master-deluxe

Жыл бұрын

what about that 95 move? bro maybe that Ricky One was the best one

Magnus' definition of "frequently" - more frequently than before😮

2:19 "The old bishop takes age 7"

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

Hemmm 🤔

@Gazuretine

Жыл бұрын

Lore Accurate

@aceinhibitors316

Жыл бұрын

omg

@Johnclouth

Жыл бұрын

@@Gazuretine lmao

@paupajares9678

Жыл бұрын

​@@Gazuretine lol

His opponent is from my country and I think against Magnus he played quite well. I'm happy about that

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

Great player👍🏻

'Who knows' the literal world champion lol

The subtitles are hilarious to read. Must be auto generated gives a touch of humour as well xD.

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

Thanks. Auto subtitles still have to be checked

No point in putting captions up when they aren’t even correct

Giving up a poem

So many people in the comment section asking what happened at 3:02. It is called "Premove", people. You play the next move in anticipation of opponent's move. So when magnus played knight to B5, he anticipated that knight will be taken out by bishop on the next move. So he pre-moved pawn takes bishop. Saves few seconds.

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

👍🏻

I'm sorry if you're not a native speaker but the subtitles are not so accurate sometimes. I would also recommend using the youtube Closed Caption feature instead of manually editing captions :)

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

Sorry. Actually is auto subtitle

I love the subtitles 🤣

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

🫣

the subtitle had me dying lol

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

🤭

3:57 en passant😩

@samuelcote8453

Жыл бұрын

And you lose the knight

@forteplayz9826

Жыл бұрын

@@samuelcote8453 en passant>knight

the captions xD

The subtitle is trolling 🤣

2:04 translation at bottom corner be like "im not sure about bish basics thought, i really like getting 95" "knight to age 4"

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

🫣 sorry . That's auto subtitle

@shxdo3712

Жыл бұрын

@@chessmath_ its fine its funnier xd

Very cool

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

Thanks

Who noticed that the SUBTITLES are wrong 😅

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

Yeah everybody noticed. Sorry actually is auto subtitle

This is equivalent to me as 900-1000 playing against 500-600 elo.😂

@ahrhebbx2239

Жыл бұрын

Not how math works

@purde9349

Жыл бұрын

It's how math works but it's not how elo works. The difference between a 3100 and a 2800 is most likely something like 1500 vs 500. If not more. The higher you go, the more the differences will mean. Climbing up 50 elos in high ranking would be like couple hundreds in lower rankings.

@That_Awesome_Guy1

Жыл бұрын

@@purde9349 elo uses the win probability formula 1 / (1 + 10^((R1 - R2) / 400)). It turns out that the same relative ratings (like 3100 to 2800 and 1200 to 900) always have the same win probability. The difference is that there are fewer people with the elos 3100 or 2800. Correct me if I'm wrong.

@purde9349

Жыл бұрын

@That Awesome Guy You are absolutely right. It's why I said the math checks out. But this isn't about the math part. Simply the skill differences between the players. Take it like this: you can go up until well above a 1k rating without even thinking about learning openings or things like that. Even blundering less can get you from 500 to 1000. But if a 2800 rated player could change something so trivial and get 3100, we would have a lot more players with the latter rating. But at some point, the differences in rankings are going to be so in-depth, that lower-rated players would simply not even understand it probably. And this can simply be seen by how much easier it is to go from 900 to 1200 than from 2800 to 3100. Also factor in how people with these higher ratings most likely dedicate most of their lives to chess. A person with a rating of 900 probably plays chess while eating or waiting for the bus, yet they can still climb.

What happened at 3:02 how his horse get killed

so many moments where i couldnt find the best move....those that were played by Magnus

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

High accuracy every move

I think if u face the Qgbt you shouldn't castle kingside and allow all the ideas behind this setup. I think the black lion is fun vs the qgbt.

@TomJones-tx7pb

Жыл бұрын

Castling too soon as black is a common mistake. It is better to be ready to castle but time the actual castle. Sometimes it is better to just play a timely h6 before castling. In fact, in my playing through Karpov's games the only flaw in his game I saw that showed up occasionally was castling a couple of moves too soon. Cost him a game against Yasser Seirawan, for example.

@BREAKocean

Жыл бұрын

Does this apply to other openings for black against 1.d4 2.c4 or just the QGD. I play the Dutch and sometimes KID, and you Castle very quickly in both of them.

who made was subtitles... if you really don't understand I can list all mistakes

@Julz_99

Жыл бұрын

Looks like auto generated

@DJMightyFresh

Жыл бұрын

@@Julz_99 it's pretty funny

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

Actually Auto subtitle

@gregorykl2317

Жыл бұрын

@@chessmath_ No offense, i thought if you didnt know i could help. Cool vide, by the way

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

@@gregorykl2317 thanks. i appreciate it. ❤️

That was cool

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

Hope you guys enjoy

Let's go Ricky one

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

Let's go

God damn, those subtitles are distracting. Bisch Basics, bishop takes age 7.

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

😅 sorry. Auto subtitle

Whats that move at minute 3? Where you play two moves at once, your night followed immediately by taking your own night with your own pawn. I feel like I'm in the twilight zone

@seventy3percent

Жыл бұрын

Its a Pre-move. He's anticipating that black will take his Knight and once that happens he will recapture with the Pawn. Of course this is only possible in online chess.

Lucky

He is very nonchalant about stepping on people’s throat! 😅

What happened there, he played his horse, and on the same move made his pawn jump diagonally and eat his own horse and the pawn took the place of the horse.... what was that

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

🤔

@francisbedard8931

Жыл бұрын

​@@chessmath_ it happened at minute 3 of the video, ive never seen two moves played at once and I've never seen someone take their own horse with a pawn. Whats that move called?

where does magnus carlsen stream?

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

Twitch. link in the latest video

Where did Black's white bishop go? Come on dude

Knight E7 translates to 97. Truly chess expert channel owner.

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

Thanks. Actually is auto subtitle. 🫡

The subtitles

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

😊

What game is this? Never thought you can take your own pieces in chess.

@S1CKnDaH34D

Жыл бұрын

i didnt get it aswell

what are these subtitles

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

Sorry. That is auto subtitle

Don't use auto subs please. Distracting! Great otherwise

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

Ok . Thanks

wtf are those subtitles

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

Sorry. Actually is auto subtitle

where's gambit? it's just an exchange. clickbait :@ dislkike

what are this substitles though hshsha

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

Sorry, actually is auto subtitle

Romania 3 :))

If you don't know how to translate a video you shouldn't try to do it. And if it's done like that on purpose, I don't know what kind of maniac would find this funny.

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

🫣

what is this translate tf

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

Sorry. Actually is auto subtitle

I think it’s a fake game video of Magnus just included

What kind of noob goes rickie four instead of age 6? 🤪🤣

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

🤭

that is not a gambit. he's exposing the overworked rook. he never had any intentions of giving the queen up, it's a fancy way of trading queens.

Opponent missed mate in 1 at the end

@Ramin2340

Жыл бұрын

no he didn't

@chessmath_

Жыл бұрын

🤔

@Senzu_Beannn

Жыл бұрын

He Was In Check😂

@ThePalmWoods

Жыл бұрын

What's more likely: the world champion and an international master both missing M1 or you missing a check?

@Youtube_Stole_My_Handle_Too

Жыл бұрын

@@ThePalmWoods I wonder why the net is swelling of arrogant morons. Instead of asking they push a claim.

"Teaches queens gambit to 2800"... when Magnus was doing pretty mediocre in the opening and made multiple inaccuracies... wow... Magnus is not what he used to be.. what ever happened to him pawn storming kingside in these positions and preparing a winning rook endgame??? So sad

@gkorp

Жыл бұрын

Quite a sad take considering super GMs often purposely make so-called inaccuracies in the openings, especially in blitz, to take their opponents out of theory Also as to your second point of him grinding down opponents with a pawn advantage in a rook endgame, that's in classical chess and this is, once again, blitz So your opinion simply fails to take into account that strategies will differ in different time controls Hope this helps

@THEBOYDALEK

Жыл бұрын

and another clown enters the arena…….

@patrickpet7905

Жыл бұрын

@@gkorp definitely a strategy when he admits to making the mistakes, regretting doing it, and going "uhh ohh!! Uhh ohhh!!" Yeah Magnus Fan Boy in the house... who didn't even watch the video.. my overall point is that videos are titled differently then their content, especially on channels focused on $$$