Hey Chaps! If you had $1699 to spare...🤑would you buy this??

i lost interest when u named the PPI

The curve seems wayyy too excessive to me lol

Terrible review in that the logic used just doesn't ad up. He has in front of him a very unique monitor, which I also OWN ... and you cannot see the pixels. HE said "almost" ... well .. almost is "NOT" seeing the pixels. So he is taking a jab at the product. He put's this monitor down a handful of times. He doesn't speak to the monitor for for himself. This monitor is amazing and it can be found for cheaper now. If he doesn't like it .... move on. It's pointless to try and change to monitor. It's what it is. I don't get these guys that get something and then start complaining about the size, etc etc, this is wrong, that's not great and the they want to just change the form factor around. NO, move on and buy something else.

I can’t take these companies seriously when they ruin oled monitors by putting horrible anti-glare coating on it.

The resolution is what stopped me from purchasing this. Looking to upgrade to OLED from my older Samsung 49" (5120x1440) and do not want to give up nearly 2000 pixels on the horizontal. For a monitor this size and aspect ratio I expect at least 1600p if not 2160p. Will likely upgrade to the new Samsung 49" OLED.

I think they should bring the size down to 42 inch and bring the resolution up to 3840x1600. That would bring the pixel density up to 98 PPI.

3440 x 1440? No Thanks. Not for that Size. Should have been 3840 x 1600 or 5120 x 2880

I've been on 3440x14400 for like 7 years now and it's brilliant! However I 'only' have 34" and I really think I'd agree that it's too low for 45" 🤔

Imagine dropping 1700 on a non 4k monitor....whomp whomp

shame, this monitore should be minimum 4K

Not having built in speakers...

Something I wish Nvidia would do is enable DLDSR over HDMI 2.1 seeing as how we have the extra bandwidth there. The only way to use DLDSR on this monitor is to us DP 1.4 (not DSC) at 144hz in order to force a higher resolution through the Nvidia Control panel, which could help a little bit with the sharpness of the overall image. I know it's not the same as true PPI with true 3840x1600, but it could be a solid middle ground.

Thank you for the transparent review and wonderful video!

I'm super happy we are hitting the next gen of screens (OLED, micro LED, mini LED), that I"m really exciting for. I'm not into curved these days. I had a 27inch curved monitor for home and a 34" ultra wide curved for work for two years. I gamed on both of them. Both were gaming monitors (MSI and Acer gaming lines.). With my current setup I'm using two screens. The primary is a Lenovo office monitor with some gaming'ish features on it and I love it.

You really need to observe this monitor in person to see how it fares. I was lucky enough to find a store where it had this monitor next to the LG 48" 4K OLED and the Samsung Neo G9 (which I have).

This monitor would be perfect if it was 40 inch and has less curve like 1500-1800. PPI would then be around decent 93 ppi and with less curve you can push it back little further. Being 800 curve, you are forced to bring in the monitor closer which will make you notice low pixel 82 ppi. Maybe next iteration...

Been waiting for a review! Yes!

Thanks for that amazing review!

Great review. It really should be 92 dpi at least, so I do agree that they should shrink it a bit. I have a 32” (31.5”) 2K (2560 x 1440) main monitor and a 24” (23.8”) secondary FHD monitor. Both are IPS and have nearly the same approx 92 dpi pixel density. For my eyes and at my viewing distance, their pixel density is sufficient enough that I don’t notice the pixels. Perhaps on a different panel type, I might notice. In contrast, I have a 27” FHD monitor at the office, and its too pixelated. The small decrease in pixel density makes a huge difference.