What did you think of the film "Kingdom of Heaven"?

@user-ii6sm3zd7k

Ай бұрын

I thought it was alright

@harrymulcaster-jones5195

Ай бұрын

The directors cut is a better film then the original cut

@swardy27

Ай бұрын

I did a highschool history report on it. Using the siege scene to compare how accurate it was.

@TheZero1er

Ай бұрын

Great movie. Well, the Director's Cut a least, that fixed a lot of the plot holes from the theatrical cut.

@orionzanzibar1000

Ай бұрын

Theatrical cut was terrible, Directors cut was fantastic.

If you want to watch the film, i advise getting your hands on the Directors Cut, if you can. It makes the film a whole lot more coherent

@Thebiolizard590

Ай бұрын

Also, remember it is WILDLY inaccurate

@overheadcastle1

Ай бұрын

It’s on prime video

7:17 I don't know but he did have a comment for historians who disliked the film "you don't know what you are talking about, you weren't there"

When I was sixteen, I won a great victory, I felt at that moment I shall live to be a hundred. Now I know I shall not see thirty.

Love it. My favorite actor, ALEXANDER SIDDIG was in it as Saladin's right hand man who brought Balien to Jerusalem

Kingdomof Heaven reaction incoming? That will be amazing!

4:25 from what I have seen people disliked how they potrayed the one character, I don't recall his name, but I think in the film he just leaves rejecting a local ruling position as his brother died or something but in real life he stuck around and was even allowed to continue ruling after the muslims took over as well as his descendants from what I recall. People seemed to dislike him suddenly being all family comes first rather than his holy duty, whitch he was even recognised for by his opponents.

Ah yes, King Baldwin, the King of Jeruselam, long live King Baldwin!

Terry has amazing hats

Know your meme cites it 9 days ago. Feels like it’s work 😊

2:15 I'm pretty sure it was done for a mixture of reasons centered around time and money savings. It's cheaper for the makeup effects team to just put on a few things around his eyes, meaning Edward Norton didn't have to sit in the chair for hours on end.

If you're going to rewatch "Kingdom of Heaven" (2005) I wholeheartedly suggest you watch the 3 hr 14 min Director's Cut/Roadshow edition. It's the superior version of the film and includes many subplots that add to and help flesh out the characters, especially Sibylla and her child.

I wonder how many people are also subbed to Weird History. I think it would be neat to see Mr. Terry react to some of their videos.

I’m a little upset bc I always wanted a king Baldwin tattoo and what do you know the exact frame I wanted to have is now a meme for 13 year olds smh

I have seen kingdom of heaven couple times really good movie similar as Arn movies, always loved king baldwin.

"FRIEND NOOO😭😭😭" "oh well anyway i'll take the free bux😀"

you did this because of the last infinite craft stream right?

I really liked this film, like you I loved the mask. I'll have to dig into my collection of DVDs as I haven't watched it for years

Lord Terry I. LOL! All hail Lord Terry! :D

If you rewatch it you have to watch the directors cut version it so 10x better, I recently(about a month ago) rewatched it, great movie 👍

Why is the infinite craft stream not permanent

Those who didn't like the positive depiction of Saladin are probably very biased against Muslims

@seanharris8419

Ай бұрын

How about the depiction of the crusaders as bumbling idiots? I bet your biases allow you to be ok with that don’t they.

@runajain5773

Ай бұрын

​@@seanharris8419baciscally it better not to depict both side as demon ize

@Pure_Havoc

Ай бұрын

@@seanharris8419 literally that happen at the battle of hattin

I somehow missed this meme and I’m a 22 year old obsessed with history

Literally me

Idea! You should play the HistoricalPlaces game on geoguessr and give us some facts about each one

Kingdom of heaven is terrible on the history and portrays the crusaders nearly entirely incorrectly, so it gives people a bad depiction of history, but the settings, music, shots, and big moments of the movie are iconic.

@mikefun7482

Ай бұрын

yea I saw a video highlighting that and had to actually do a research paper for school on the discrepancies

I did like it back then, nowadays it is like with a lot of movies after I got into the stories and history the movies depict. I get conflicting feelings for a not 100 percent historicly correct portrayal. Not in a "I can't enjoy this!' but more in a "The scale is too big, they have dozens of siege towers and trebuchets and as a wise man once said: Where are the ditches?" It is necessary and I know it. There need to be artistic liberty to make a story compelling and to even bring it on the silver screen. If I want more facts I look for documentaries. But the more you know about something it takes this feel of wonder and awe from you as you discover inconsistencies.

YES

It would've been ridiculous if he did this in a burger king crown

@charlesmaurer6214

Ай бұрын

Could have got a sponsor out of that one if he asked I bet.

React to history dose video of Mongols vs assassins.

Kingdom of heaven director’s cut is a better movie than the theater cut

One thing I think could be interesting is if one of the history teachers react to a reaction of another history teacher…or maybe it’d be stupid.

I enjoyed the film, I think it's a good watch, but I think that the Templars got the shitty end of the stick in the movie. They always get vilified, but in this it was cranked up to clownishly evil. They weren't people. They were just cartoonish villains. I think a better depiction would have been to include not just the one monkish good Hospitaller and the cartoonishly evil Templars. They should have made all three of the Knightly Orders present. Have the Hospitallers be the ones thinking of the people and their wards, have the Templars be sort of aloof or distant and more long-term focused, and then have the Teutonic Order be the bloodthirsty war mongers... Because they were.

@NormanKnight-rp9je

Ай бұрын

The teutonic order did not exist at the time of the third crusade. And no they were not bloodthirsty.

@PenumbranWolf

Ай бұрын

Norm, I cant quote you or see your comment so I hope you get notified, but the Illustrious Tuetonic order were a knightly order founded on the premise of murdering pagans for the Pope. They had no reason to be in Prussia otherwise. Second, they were founded in 1190. The third crusade ended in 1192. Out of all the inaccuracies this movie committed I don't think including some late arrivals would have been out of the question. Particularly since Raynald of Châtillon outlived Baldwin by 2 years and Balian never existed.

@NormanKnight-rp9je

28 күн бұрын

@@PenumbranWolf You are Correct, I was wrong, the teutonic order was founded during the latter years of the Crusade. However, during the events of the movie kingdom of Heaven, it actually takes place before the order even began. I stand by what I said in saying the Teutonic order was not bloodthirsty, due to what Europe was at that time. Comparatively, no they were not that much bloodthirsty than other groups during this time in Europe. Also the group of people that the Teutonic knights fought were indeed lagans, but their religion consisted in the kidnapping and raping of woman, and further debauchery that I will not go into detail. Absolutely there was a need, and justification for the Teutonic knights to be there.

I know I 'll blow some ppl's minds with this fact: King Baldwin was played by Edward Norton in kingdom of heaven...

Many of us Christians have huge respect toward Saladin.

Kingdom of heaven is a cool movie but it is so historically inaccurate that it kind of ruins it

WATCH THE DIRECTORS CUT ONE OF THE BEST MOVIES

✋😔

Anyone who gets offended hearing that some ppl need to touch grass, needs to touch grass

DEUS VULT!

Ridley Scott is a joke for history if you like him idk how your a history teacher all his movies are just incredibly wrong like what ever happens in his movies the opposite was true in real life

Saladin is hated in real life for ironic reasons sourced throughout many records of times. A lot of Christians groups today tried to paint the crusades in a better light and enemies at the time in a darker version. Ironically the enemies of the Christian crusaders were more honorable and less bloodthirsty than the crusaders themselves. The Muslims at the time either enslaved the losers or allowed them to sent the messages of Islam. The Crusaders usually just killed all the losers/POW’s and hardly kept anyone else alive. In Christian control territories during the Crusades were be Christian or else. In Muslim controlled territories it was believe in god or else. Saladin was also a lot more peaceful and intelligent in real life which pisses off crusader fan boys.

@NormanKnight-rp9je

Ай бұрын

What is your source? What started the crusades was Muslim occupation of Christian Palestine, Christian Antioch, Christian Syria, Christian Egypt, Christian Spain, and much more. The Christians had a system where they would use flags to protect families, even though they were not very effective. Thomas Madden's the concise history of the crusades accentuates these points.

Been years since I watched it and KOH was so far off I could not stand it.

Kindom of heaven is a bad movie and is way to charitable to the islamic side of the conflict. But baldwin was great.

@kurosu-samaklipleri7090

Ай бұрын

"Islamic side" you are not even calling the name of Saladdin. When he died they only find 2-3 pieces of gold in his treasury. He feed the poor, developed the region and ruled the sultanate fairly to his own terms. But hey, you can dismiss all that and be a racist too. Thats make your narrative and hate more easier, isn't it?

@keeperofthetriforce7

Ай бұрын

@@kurosu-samaklipleri7090 I see you tried the racism card which usally means you have no argument. But I'll give you the benefit of the doubt where in my statement was the racism you so accuse me of?

@kurosu-samaklipleri7090

Ай бұрын

@@keeperofthetriforce7 you might be right its not about racism but there is definitely some sort of hate you spreading with in "charitable to the islamic side of the conflict" statement. There is a sinister implicated rumor about Islam in that time and you are not providing any information.

@keeperofthetriforce7

Ай бұрын

@@kurosu-samaklipleri7090 I don't hate Islamic people nor am I spreading hate. I just know we're the justifications of the conflicts are.

@kurosu-samaklipleri7090

Ай бұрын

@@keeperofthetriforce7 ok then please can you tell me some of them because I am curious and also care about realvsfiction situations from movies

Didn't realize till this that some of the worst history fraud films were made by the same man, Scott. Napoleon and Kingdom of Heaven are horrible historically.

@hexoslaya3696

6 күн бұрын

The amount of contempt he had for his target audience for Napoleon was the reason I *legitimately* obtained it. That film should have been broken into 2/3 parts and had different actors showing his age change. Instead we got Napoleons here, oh wait he’s there now. Why? Who knows? We won’t tell you.