Junkers JU-87 Stuka | The Trumpet Of Death | WW2 Aircraft | Upscaled Documentary | The German Stuka

Ғылым және технология

The Junkers Ju 87 or Stuka (from Sturzkampfflugzeug, "dive bomber") was a German dive bomber and ground-attack aircraft. Designed by Hermann Pohlmann, it first flew in 1935. The Ju 87 made its combat debut in 1937 with the Luftwaffe's Condor Legion during the Spanish Civil War of 1936-1939 and served Axis forces in World War II (1939-1945).
The aircraft is easily recognisable by its inverted gull wings and fixed spatted undercarriage. Upon the leading edges of its faired main gear legs were mounted ram-air sirens known as Jericho trumpets , which became a propaganda symbol of German air power and of the so-called Blitzkrieg victories of 1939-1942, as well as providing Stuka pilots with audible feedback as to speed. The Stuka's design included several innovations, including automatic pull-up dive brakes under both wings to ensure that the aircraft recovered from its attack dive even if the pilot blacked out from the high g-forces.
The Ju 87 operated with considerable success in close air support and anti-shipping roles at the outbreak of World War II. It led air assaults in the invasion of Poland in September 1939. Stukas proved critical to the rapid conquest of Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium and France in 1940. Though sturdy, accurate, and very effective against ground targets, the Stuka was, like many other dive bombers of the period, vulnerable to fighter aircraft. During the Battle of Britain of 1940-1941, its lack of manoeuvrability, speed and defensive armament meant that it required a heavy fighter escort to operate effectively.
After the Battle of Britain, the Luftwaffe deployed Stuka units in the Balkans Campaign, the African and the Mediterranean theatres and in the early stages of the Eastern Front war, where it was used for general ground support, as an effective specialised anti-tank aircraft and in an anti-shipping role. Once the Luftwaffe lost air superiority, the Stuka became an easy target for enemy fighter-aircraft. It was produced until 1944 for lack of a better replacement. By 1945 ground-attack versions of the Focke-Wulf Fw 190 had largely replaced the Ju 87, but it remained in service until the end of the war in 1945.
Germany built an estimated 6,000 Ju 87s of all versions between 1936 and August 1944.
Oberst Hans-Ulrich Rudel became the most successful Stuka pilot and the most highly decorated German serviceman of the Second World War.
The Ju 87's principal designer, Hermann Pohlmann, held the opinion that any dive-bomber design needed to be simple and robust. This led to many technical innovations, such as the retractable undercarriage being discarded in favour of one of the Stuka's distinctive features, its fixed and "spatted" undercarriage. Pohlmann continued to carry on developing and adding to his ideas and those of Dipl Ing Karl Plauth (Plauth was killed in a flying accident in November 1927), and produced the Ju A 48, which underwent testing on 29 September 1928. The military version of the Ju A 48 was designated the Ju K 47.
Ernst Udet; the greatest proponent of the dive-bomber and the Ju 87
Despite initial competition from the Henschel Hs 123, the Reichsluftfahrtministerium (RLM, the German aviation ministry) turned to the designs of Herman Pohlmann of Junkers and co-designer of the K 47, Karl Plauth. During the trials with the K 47 in 1932, the double vertical stabilisers were introduced to give the rear gunner a better field of fire. The main, and what was to be the most distinctive, feature of the Ju 87 was its double-spar inverted gull wings. After Plauth's death, Pohlmann continued the development of the Junkers dive bomber. The Ju A 48 registration D-ITOR, was originally fitted with a BMW 132 engine, producing 450 kW (600 hp).
General characteristics
Crew: 2
Length: 11.10 m (36 ft 5 in)
Wingspan: 13.805 m (45 ft 3.5 in)
Height: 4.01 m (13 ft 2 in)
Wing area: 31.900 m2 (343.37 sq ft)
Airfoil: Göttingen 256
Empty weight: 2,712 kg (5,980 lb)
Empty equipped weight: 2,760 kg (6,090 lb)
Max takeoff weight: 4,336 kg (9,560 lb)
Powerplant: 1 × Junkers Jumo 211Da V-12 inverted liquid-cooled piston engine, 890 kW (1,200 hp) for take-off
820 kW (1,100 hp) at 1,500 m (4,920 ft)
Propellers: 3-bladed Junkers constant-speed propeller
Performance
Maximum speed: 339.6 km/h (211.0 mph, 183.4 kn) at sea level
383 km/h (238 mph; 207 kn) at 4,087 m (13,410 ft)
Cruise speed: 209 km/h (130 mph, 113 kn) at 4,572 m (15,000 ft)
Range: 595.5 km (370.0 mi, 321.5 nmi) with 500 kg (1,102 lb) bomb
789 km (490 mi; 426 nmi) without bomb load
Rate of climb: 2.3 m/s (450 ft/min)
Time to altitude: 1,000 m (3,281 ft) in 2 minutes
2,000 m (6,562 ft) in 4 minutes 18 seconds
3,716 m (12,190 ft) in 12 minutes
Armament
Guns: 2× 7.92 mm (0.31 in) MG 17 machine gun forward, 1× 7.92 mm (0.31 in) MG 15 machine gun to rear
Bombs: 1× 250 kg (550 lb) bomb beneath the fuselage and 4× 50 kg (110 lb) under-wing.
#aircraft #ju87 #divebomb

Пікірлер: 98

  • @Dronescapes
    @Dronescapes Жыл бұрын

    Click the link to watch more aircraft, heroes and their stories, missions: www.youtube.com/@Dronescapes

  • @MikeG42
    @MikeG42 Жыл бұрын

    Good video DroneScapes , the Junkers Ju-87 Stuka is one of my favorite aircraft of all time. Thanks 😃👍

  • @Dronescapes

    @Dronescapes

    Жыл бұрын

    👍👍

  • @0ldb1ll
    @0ldb1ll Жыл бұрын

    The German stuka pilots hated the sirens and disabled them whenever possible. The RAF pilots liked them because they were slow and easily shot down.

  • @Senzai-lz1nm

    @Senzai-lz1nm

    6 ай бұрын

    no the RAF shited their pants if they heard it :)

  • @asullivan4047
    @asullivan404711 ай бұрын

    Interesting and informative. Excellent photography job making it easier for viewers to better understand what the orator was describing. So Spain was an excellent proving grounds for the stuka. Special thanks to the Luftwaffe pilots for making this documentary possible!!!

  • @razvanastrenie1455
    @razvanastrenie1455 Жыл бұрын

    Second to none. The idea of wings is literally GENIUS !

  • @tessaleroux7725
    @tessaleroux7725 Жыл бұрын

    Love this plane. iconic

  • @MrLBPug
    @MrLBPug Жыл бұрын

    In practice, Luftwaffe aircrews quickly got rid of the sirens (which were also never called Jericho Trumpets by the Germans) because they caused unnecessary drag. They made for a nice propaganda tool in news reels but getting every mph from their crates was a bit more important than sounding scary.

  • @herptek

    @herptek

    9 ай бұрын

    It wasn't capable of outrunning up to date fighter aircraft anyway. Might just as well sound scary. The unfortunate target who can't or isn't allowed to change position rather swiftly might have been slightly unnerved having to stick to positions. Those who could try to evade the attack were all that much more certain to do so instantly. I don't know how relevant it is in this case, but I guess there are other advantages from lesser drag as well as higher top speed. Clearly it did matter enough to forgo infamous psychological effect however.

  • @hmasdropbear1372

    @hmasdropbear1372

    7 ай бұрын

    But still it doesn't stop Hollywood making every single airplane that's in a dive sounding like a Stuka with sirens on.

  • @LawrenceofIsrael

    @LawrenceofIsrael

    6 ай бұрын

    Don't underestimate the psychological effect.

  • @kingrobbie1793
    @kingrobbie17939 ай бұрын

    Imagine the fear from everybody on the ground when you hear that! Flying HELL!

  • @jerryjeromehawkins1712
    @jerryjeromehawkins1712 Жыл бұрын

    When Form and Function combine perfectly. Subscribed!!! Excellent video my friend. 🇺🇸🍻

  • @Dronescapes

    @Dronescapes

    Жыл бұрын

    🙏👍

  • @anydaynow01
    @anydaynow01 Жыл бұрын

    It's great you mentioned the greatest decorated pilot of all time, Hans-Ulrich Rudel, he was a filthy Nazi to the core, but there is no denying he was one of the greatest warriors of all time.

  • @daverbenson4834

    @daverbenson4834

    Жыл бұрын

    Rudel was a Warrior hero He Served His Country Not like The Filthy Yank who tried to steal his Knights Cross

  • @daverbenson4834

    @daverbenson4834

    Жыл бұрын

    Grubs

  • @rickradix7464

    @rickradix7464

    Жыл бұрын

    I remember reading "Stuka pilot" in the 1970s. I think I'll revisit it, I know I liked it, let's see now.

  • @konradhenrykowicz1859

    @konradhenrykowicz1859

    Жыл бұрын

    No denying? Do you really believe in this bullshit story? Do you know that only 1,5 percent of soviet armores vehicles was destroyed by airstrike? Including bombardment? That means circa 1500 units. Can you do the math? The guy was not not a great warrior he was a great bullshit teller.

  • @CHC1954

    @CHC1954

    11 ай бұрын

    There’s no such thing as a nazi that was a great warrior. They all go their ass kicked by America

  • @anydaynow01
    @anydaynow01 Жыл бұрын

    The A-10s BRRRT! is like the JU-87s sirens. Slow But Deadly, just like the SBD Dauntless which was the aircraft responsible for turning the tide in the Pacific, and the A-1 Skyraider which saved many USA ground pounder lives in Vietnam.

  • @flyback_driver

    @flyback_driver

    Жыл бұрын

    I was just about to say when I heard they hate it as much as my men love it I immediately thought of Afghanistan. So many times I called in CAS and they would save the day.

  • @stevetackett581

    @stevetackett581

    Жыл бұрын

    Rudel advised our govt on the development of the A-10

  • @th.burggraf7814
    @th.burggraf7814 Жыл бұрын

    It was a pleasure to watch this video. Thanks for sharing this. 🤝

  • @Dronescapes

    @Dronescapes

    Жыл бұрын

    thank you!!!

  • @manricobianchini5276
    @manricobianchini5276 Жыл бұрын

    Good video, but there was one other plane that made a nice instantly recognized by enemy pilots---F4U Corsair.

  • @oiops
    @oiops Жыл бұрын

    Background music is to loud....

  • @robertbrulc8435
    @robertbrulc8435 Жыл бұрын

    Nice Sky Gamblers: Storm Raiders video thumbnail you got there! Haha

  • @oilguygamer1744
    @oilguygamer1744 Жыл бұрын

    brilliant, some of the photos and images are superb, is it possible that you can reveal your source of them, especially the still images. please.

  • @tessaleroux7725
    @tessaleroux7725 Жыл бұрын

    Pity there are none left. Difficult to fly. But totally awesome planes

  • @BLASTSFROMTHEPAST

    @BLASTSFROMTHEPAST

    Жыл бұрын

    There are two surviving, and one at the RAF museum near London - I've been to see it!

  • @noahwail2444

    @noahwail2444

    Жыл бұрын

    There is beeing build a replica, to be airworthy. So it will be seen in the skyes again.

  • @BLASTSFROMTHEPAST

    @BLASTSFROMTHEPAST

    Жыл бұрын

    @noah wail that will be some sight! I wonder if they'll install the horns of jericho too.

  • @theschmedaparadox1018

    @theschmedaparadox1018

    Жыл бұрын

    There's one in a museum in germany

  • @martinwarm4041

    @martinwarm4041

    Жыл бұрын

    Apparently they were a pilots plane..not so hard to fly..

  • @antgiat
    @antgiat Жыл бұрын

    nice! one thing to add if I may? the last successful employment of the StuKa was in the battle for the dodecanese after the Italians capitulated....the swan song if you please! finaly someone who can pronounce Luftwaffe and StuKa well!

  • @williamzk9083

    @williamzk9083

    8 ай бұрын

    The Ju 88 transitioned from dive bombing to low level gun ship and ended the war as a very effective night raider against allied air fields and supply depots that had one of the lowest attrition rates of the war, about 0.6% the same as the Mosquito and Marauder at that time. -The Ju 88 was designed to provide support to the Army while escorted by fighters only over front lines until artillery had been brought forward. If Germany had of maintained air pairty it probably could have been used in that role very well. --The reality was that the Germans didn't need the StuKa dive bomber so much after 1942 because they had the Lotfe 7 computing bomb sight and the StuVi 5B computing slide bombing sight allowed Ju 88, Me 210/410 and other aircrafft to bomb accurately without dive brakes.. With the Lofte 7 the bomb aimer adjusted the speed of variable speed drives in the sight to track the target (the sight contained trigonometric cams to linearize). This gave speed over ground and wind drift as well as target speed and allowed the sight to calculated the aiming offset. It was very accurate and could hit a moving merchant ship from 3500m with a 50% chance of a hit. The StuVi 5B had a moving bar that told the pilot where the bombs would go. The Ju 88 typically entered a dive at 8000ft at 22 degrees, released and pulled up by 5000ft. The Ju 88 had both Lotfe 7 and StuVi 5B so the Lotfe 7 was used to provide wind data to the StuVi as well as line up the dive. -During Operation Northwind (Luftwaffe Support for the Battle of the Bulge) the Luftwaffe started using the TSA-2D toss bombing sight on KG51 Me 262. With this sight you did a shallow dive at the target, pulled up and the bombs were released automatically during the pull up. The sight was to be used on Fw 190D jabos as well. So there was no need.

  • @phlodel
    @phlodel Жыл бұрын

    Many years ag, i read in a BOOK that the Jericho trumpet was an impeller that drove a dive speed indicator, helping give the Stuka it's bombing accuracy. I've been unable to find the reference online or in print.

  • @davidgleinbach7316

    @davidgleinbach7316

    Жыл бұрын

    Jericho horns gave audible cue for altitude/bomb release. SPARS INSTRUMENTATION DIVE ANGLE INDICATOR a LOW FUEL INDICATOR LIGHT(idiot light in US) air speed maybe and a clock. There is a rear facing navigator I Imagine he had more instruments back there....maybe a forward facing mirror, cup holder perhaps? Out.

  • @davidgleinbach7316
    @davidgleinbach7316 Жыл бұрын

    Drive/dive editing A.T.detail lends to accuracy perception....more technical detail on weapons and airframe actualy called Jericho horn 2 located on spats also gave pilots an audible cue on altitude /bomb release. Thank you good part 1 STUKA...... Out

  • @robertbrulc8435
    @robertbrulc8435 Жыл бұрын

    Any way I can get that thumbnail in full size?

  • @mohamedjaber4229
    @mohamedjaber4229 Жыл бұрын

    The legend

  • @epicpro1461
    @epicpro1461 Жыл бұрын

    The first picture u showed of the Spitfire said BOZO on the side. LOLLLL

  • @kevinrhodes79
    @kevinrhodes79Ай бұрын

    They were like the American worthogs. Slow but effective in combat ??past tense or future present ??? I seen warthogs save me so .I'm confused

  • @Dr.Madd138
    @Dr.Madd138 Жыл бұрын

    I main’d this aircraft in War Thunder, till I got the variant with the cannons. I always hit my targets but would almost instantly get creamed by fighters.

  • @williamzk9083

    @williamzk9083

    8 ай бұрын

    Ju 87G that were used on the Eastern front had lower attrition rates than the Fw 190F mainly because they had escorts. The tactic was to fly low and enter a tight turn. The Soviet fighter would then be exposed to the rear gunner and would have difficulty getting his guns onto the Ju 87 due to the low altitude and tight turn. The gunner might damage or even shoot down the soviet or it might break off when an escort came.

  • @jackdale9831
    @jackdale9831 Жыл бұрын

    During the dialogue you used, It said "the small-engined Stuka..." when you meant. "the SINGLE-engined..." The inverted Junkers Jumo V-12 --there was NOTHING 'small' about it, being one of Junkers largest piston engines, plus the Stuka was NOT a "small plane!" When you eretalking about the "Jerico's Trumpet" look @ the Ju-87A model with a "23" on the right wheel spat. "That was NOT manning a "Jericho-Trumpet," because the "A" models didn't use them, nor did the later Ju-87"D" (Dora) models. Most Ju-87"B"s, used them. but the "D"s were replacing them by '42, and I don't know WHY the Luftwaffe STOPPED using them on ALL Ju-87s, from the "B" through "D", but for some reason, they did STOP using the "Jericho."

  • @noahwail2444

    @noahwail2444

    Жыл бұрын

    Because it could not be turned off, and it created an enormous amount of drag, slowing the plane down. And it was slow to begin with. Actualy, only a few used the trumpet after the beginning, the cons outweighed the pros.

  • @theonlymadmac4771

    @theonlymadmac4771

    11 ай бұрын

    My geography teacher flew this plane in WW II, later he flew FW 190s. He never used the sirens, but liked the plane

  • @timbungarner3842
    @timbungarner3842 Жыл бұрын

    Wonder how the JU 87 stuka would have done against the US Pacific fleet in WWII

  • @HarborLockRoad

    @HarborLockRoad

    Жыл бұрын

    Good question, but the japanese designed the val after seeing the stuka, so its almost an offshoot, but, the japanese made everything long range for the pacific, so the stuka may have not been as easy to burst into flames, but probably not had the range needed there ... I think the american . 50 cals would have easily taken care of them, either way.

  • @konradhenrykowicz1859

    @konradhenrykowicz1859

    Жыл бұрын

    Same as Japanese divers. Stuka was not a wonder of its time.

  • @spannaspinna

    @spannaspinna

    Жыл бұрын

    I think there would be a lot more battleships sitting beside Arizona especially with a fighter escort

  • @williamzk9083

    @williamzk9083

    8 ай бұрын

    The Ju 87 performed very well in the anti shipping role. The Ju 87 was very accurate due to its excellent controllabillity in the dive though the crews needed training to hit moving ships. The early Ju 87B versions of the StuKa had a relatively short range (to small for the Pacific) because the purpose was only to support the German army over front lines until 150mm artillery could be brought forward. They were supposed to fly back to a forward airfield and rearm and refuel so range of 595km/370 miles with a 500kg/1100 lb bomb was adequate. The anti shipping missions the Luftwaffe might need to conduct in 1938 would have been short ranged as well. -The need for longer range lead to the improvised Ju 88R which was a Ju 88B with increased oil capacity and plumbing for a pair of 300L/66 Imp Gallon drop tanks under the wings and rescue and survival equipment. Some took part in the German invasion of Norway in April 1940. The British Royal Navy (RN) was surprised by the appearance of the Ju 87R, and the type sank the RN destroyers HMS AFRIDI, BISON, and GROM, as well as the anti-aircraft ship BITTERN. BITTERN's sister ship, the BLACK SWAN, was hit by a Stuka, but the bomb was dropped too low and armed too late, passing through the ship before exploding; the BLACK SWAN survived. -The Ju 88C was a Ju 88R with power folding wings modified to fly of aircraft carriers, flotation gear and the ability to carry a torpedo. Some were built and used in combat but of course never of an aircraft carriers as the Graf Zeppelin was never built.. -Finally the standardized Ju 88D had 800L of extra fuel, a 60cm increase in wing span g and also drop tanks had plenty of range. range, internal fuel: 820 kilometers (510 MI / 445 NMI) range with tanks: 1,535 kilometers (955 MI / 830 NMI) with bomb load. -The reality was that the Germans didn't need the StuKa dive bomber so much after 1942 because they had the Lotfe 7 computing bomb sight and the StuVi 5B computing slide bombing sight allowed Ju 88, Me 210/410 and other aircrafft to bomb accurately without dive brakes.. With the Lofte 7 the bomb aimer adjusted the speed of variable speed drives in the sight to track the target (the sight contained trigonometric cams to linearize). This gave speed over ground and wind drift as well as target speed and allowed the sight to calculated the aiming offset. It was very accurate and could hit a moving merchant ship from 3500m with a 50% chance of a hit. The StuVi 5B had a moving bar that told the pilot where the bombs would go. The Ju 88 typically entered a dive at 8000ft at 22 degrees, released and pulled up by 5000ft. The Ju 88 had both Lotfe 7 and StuVi 5B so the Lotfe 7 was used to provide wind data to the StuVi as well as line up the dive.

  • @garyseeseverything8615
    @garyseeseverything8615 Жыл бұрын

    England had to beg America and 20 countries for help summer 1940. RAF never stood a chance

  • @larryjenkinson4789

    @larryjenkinson4789

    Жыл бұрын

    Don't let little Englanders hear you saying that. Busting the myth that the UK was on it's own won't sit well with them.

  • @manricobianchini5276
    @manricobianchini5276 Жыл бұрын

    I love these vids but when I hear simple words pronounced wrongly, I leave. Admiralty---wrong pronunciation.

  • @konradhenrykowicz1859
    @konradhenrykowicz1859 Жыл бұрын

    Trumpet of death? It is very hard to kill with a trumpet.

  • @chrysa_gnk

    @chrysa_gnk

    Жыл бұрын

    its a metaphor, it refers to the sound of a stuka that meant impending death to anyone that heard it

  • @burdidoyburdigoy8134
    @burdidoyburdigoy8134 Жыл бұрын

    Combined Arms Tactics

  • @FinThur
    @FinThur5 ай бұрын

    Operation Barbarossa: Invade country with almost infinite supplies and people, and often drops below freezing. Great Idea!

  • @manjitsoni9676
    @manjitsoni9676 Жыл бұрын

    ਨਾਜੀ ਸੈਨਾ ਦਾ ਜੇ ਯੂ-87 ਸਟੂਕਾ ਡਾਈਵ ਬੰਬਾਰ ਦੂਸਰੇ ਵਿਸ਼ਵ ਯੁੱਧ ਦੋਰਾਨ ਦਹਿਸ਼ਤ ਦਾ ਨਾਮ ਸੀ

  • @glenskingsley5812
    @glenskingsley5812 Жыл бұрын

    Great content and info but music was overpowering didn’t watch it all for this reason

  • @catalintheodor8065
    @catalintheodor806523 күн бұрын

    It online în this world

  • @pizzatopia
    @pizzatopia Жыл бұрын

    your audio mixing makes this video unwatchable

  • @richardbruce8111
    @richardbruce8111 Жыл бұрын

    The Kiwi troops brought them down with a Bren gun! ___When they show up run away from the road, find a hole fit a magazine .2 tracer1 ap loading & have a mate to change mag --- as he comes in swing & hose in front of plane as it comes in ---Keep your nerve __ as the bomb detaches SHOUT ONE ,, TWO & JUMP for your hole! at count of THREE the bomb will go off & if you are above ground level X! The temptation as you see the pilot in his "glasshouse"you try to keep firing ---fatal--to you!. also the auto piolet of the plane will take it up anyway & the pilot blacks out ---if you HAVE got him he will not get the plane out of looping & it will continue loop & crash ...somewheres near YOU ---stay in your hole..The trick is to KEEP your nerve, ignore the screamer & JUMP at count ONE ... Brother in law JOCK claimed 3 & assisted in another 8!! in retreat from Greece & Crete true story rest in peace Jock

  • @gunthertoll1304

    @gunthertoll1304

    Жыл бұрын

    Bulshit

  • @piotrweydmann3345

    @piotrweydmann3345

    Жыл бұрын

    Makes sense. R.I.P. Jock

  • @MrLBPug

    @MrLBPug

    Жыл бұрын

    Total nonsense story, mate. The automatic pull-out deactivated when the aircraft was flying level again. Also, pull-out didn't occur at fifty metres above the ground, but far higher - to stay out of the range of small arms fire, like that Bren gun in your bogus story.

  • @ChaiLatteXD
    @ChaiLatteXD Жыл бұрын

    Lol "go-ring"

  • @bonehead2768
    @bonehead2768 Жыл бұрын

    Narrator doesn't know how to pronounce some words & names, and just drones on.

  • @Dronescapes

    @Dronescapes

    Жыл бұрын

    Sorry for this copy and paste, but it is easier... Imagine how Italians live with the fact that practically nobody can pronounce Michelangelo properly. After all, it has been 6 centuries, and Michelangelo is far more relevant to history than any less than a century old plane. Leonardo (da Vinci, not di Caprio) is probably rolling in his grave whenever someone, besides an Italian, pronounces his name. The list can go on and on 😬 I wonder how many names, words, and things Germans cannot properly pronounce in English, Italian, French, Spanish, Japanese, Portuguese, Hebrew, Dutch, Persian, etc. I am sure you would be very surprised!

  • @rocksteel44
    @rocksteel447 ай бұрын

    ...AUSGEZEICHNET!!!!!

  • @natebessette273
    @natebessette273 Жыл бұрын

    Sound just like TIE fighters lol

  • @tnhpdc44
    @tnhpdc44 Жыл бұрын

    Awful editing. Voice volume low then music comes in high then low voice again. Amateur hour?

  • @dedrakuhn6103

    @dedrakuhn6103

    Жыл бұрын

    It's so annoying to have to turn up the volume to hear the message only to get your eardrums hurt from the too damn loud music.

  • @dedrakuhn6103

    @dedrakuhn6103

    Жыл бұрын

    @@kennthreicherter couldn't hear your message Kenneth, it was distorted and drowned out by excessively loud music

  • @dedrakuhn6103

    @dedrakuhn6103

    Жыл бұрын

    @@kennthreicherter honestly it's ear aching. But you don't know that since your ears must be in your stomach just like the ear biter Mike tyson

  • @dedrakuhn6103

    @dedrakuhn6103

    Жыл бұрын

    @@kennthreicherter that's funny Kenny I like your honesty. I want to apologize. I really did like your video and appreciate the hard work you put into it. I listened to it on my phone headphones and volume changes get frustrating when trying to hear a really good interesting message. You had a great message

  • @davidgleinbach7316
    @davidgleinbach7316 Жыл бұрын

    go ring is this narrated artificially? Any well read english speaker could do better, especially NAME pronunciation is butchered by your reading machine comprehensively.

  • @radioactive_duck
    @radioactive_duck10 ай бұрын

    Its loud as f###💀

  • @williamgardiner4956
    @williamgardiner4956 Жыл бұрын

    Turned the film off ten minutes into the program because if the guy can't properly pronounce STEW KA then he knows diddly about it.

  • @harmandbraun1492

    @harmandbraun1492

    Жыл бұрын

    Strange, I'm from Germany (where the plane comes from) and we pronounce it exactly how it is in the documentary, I guess the narrator decided to pronounce it how it is actually supposed to be! And that seems a bit flawed, just because someone mispronounces a name means that they don't know anything about the topic? But by that logic I guess you also don't know anything about it😅😂

  • @TheQuestionMarkWasEmphasized

    @TheQuestionMarkWasEmphasized

    Жыл бұрын

    🤣

  • @Dronescapes

    @Dronescapes

    Жыл бұрын

    👍🙂

  • @anydaynow01

    @anydaynow01

    Жыл бұрын

    @@harmandbraun1492 My thoughts exactly! It was pronounced correctly in the video considering the parent language. Next thing we know folks will try to say the manufacturer is suppose to be pronounced Junk Ers instead of the proper "Y"ʊnkers.

  • @jouhannaudjeanfrancois891

    @jouhannaudjeanfrancois891

    Жыл бұрын

    dang... ignorant and arrogant...! quality!

Келесі