Junkers Ju 87. What you may not know about the Stuka | SHORT EDIT VERSION | Documentary

Ғылым және технология

Junkers Ju 87. What you may not know about the Stuka | SHORT EDIT VERSION. Includes commentary by Eric Winkle Brown.
The Junkers Ju 87 or Stuka (from Sturzkampfflugzeug, "dive bomber") is a German dive bomber and ground-attack aircraft. Designed by Hermann Pohlmann, it first flew in 1935. The Ju 87 made its combat debut in 1937 with the Luftwaffe's Condor Legion during the Spanish Civil War of 1936-1939 and served the Axis in World War II from beginning to end (1939-1945).
The aircraft is easily recognizable by its inverted gull wings and fixed spatted undercarriage. Upon the leading edges of its faired main gear legs were mounted ram-air sirens known as Jericho trumpets, which became a propaganda symbol of German air power and of the so-called Blitzkrieg victories of 1939-1942, as well as providing Stuka pilots with audible feedback as to speed. The Stuka's design included several innovations, including automatic pull-up dive brakes under both wings to ensure that the aircraft recovered from its attack dive even if the pilot blacked out from the high g-forces.
The Ju 87 operated with considerable success in close air support and anti-shipping roles during the outbreak of World War II. It led to air assaults in the invasion of Poland in September 1939. Stukas proved critical to the rapid conquest of Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium, and France in 1940. Though sturdy, accurate, and very effective against ground targets, the Stuka was, like many other dive bombers of the period, vulnerable to fighter aircraft. During the Battle of Britain of 1940-1941, its lack of maneuverability, speed, and defensive armament required a heavy fighter escort to operate effectively.
After the Battle of Britain, the Luftwaffe deployed Stuka units in the Balkans Campaign, the African and the Mediterranean theatres, and in the early stages of the Eastern Front war, where it was used for general ground support, as an effective specialized anti-tank aircraft, and in an anti-shipping role. Once the Luftwaffe lost air superiority, the Stuka became an easy target for enemy fighters, but it continued being produced until 1944 for lack of a better replacement. By 1945 ground-attack versions of the Focke-Wulf Fw 190 had largely replaced the Ju 87, but it remained in service until the end of the war in 1945.
The Ju 87's principal designer, Hermann Pohlmann, held the opinion that any dive-bomber design needed to be simple and robust. This led to many technical innovations, such as the retractable undercarriage being discarded in favor of one of the Stuka's distinctive features, it's fixed and "spatted" undercarriage. Pohlmann continued to carry on developing and adding to his ideas and those of Dipl Ing Karl Plauth (Plauth was killed in a flying accident in November 1927) and produced the Ju A 48, which underwent testing on 29 September 1928. The military version of the Ju A 48 was designated the Ju K 47.
General characteristics
Crew: 2
Length: 11.10 m (36 ft 5 in)
Wingspan: 13.805 m (45 ft 3.5 in)
Height: 4.01 m (13 ft 2 in)
Wing area: 31.900 m2 (343.37 sq ft)
Airfoil: Göttingen 256
Empty weight: 2,712 kg (5,980 lb)
Empty equipped weight: 2,760 kg (6,090 lb)
Max takeoff weight: 4,336 kg (9,560 lb)
Powerplant: 1 × Junkers Jumo 211Da V-12 inverted liquid-cooled piston engine, 890 kW (1,200 hp) for take-off
820 kW (1,100 hp) at 1,500 m (4,920 ft)
Propellers: 3-bladed Junkers constant-speed propeller
Performance
Maximum speed: 339.6 km/h (211.0 mph, 183.4 kn) at sea level
383 km/h (238 mph; 207 kn) at 4,087 m (13,410 ft)
Cruise speed: 209 km/h (130 mph, 113 kn) at 4,572 m (15,000 ft)
Range: 595.5 km (370.0 mi, 321.5 nmi) with 500 kg (1,102 lb) bomb
789 km (490 mi; 426 nmi) without bomb load
Rate of climb: 2.3 m/s (450 ft/min)
Time to altitude: 1,000 m (3,281 ft) in 2 minutes
2,000 m (6,562 ft) in 4 minutes 18 seconds
3,716 m (12,190 ft) in 12 minutes
Armament
Guns: 2× 7.92 mm (0.31 in) MG 17 machine gun forward, 1× 7.92 mm (0.31 in) MG 15 machine gun to rear
Bombs: 1× 250 kg (550 lb) bomb beneath the fuselage and 4× 50 kg (110 lb) under-wing.
#stuka #aircraft #airplane

Пікірлер: 64

  • @Dronescapes
    @Dronescapes Жыл бұрын

    Click the link to watch more aircraft, heroes, and their stories, and missions: www.youtube.com/@Dronescapes

  • @jbradley8659

    @jbradley8659

    Жыл бұрын

    What is the name of the stuka that had gondolas?

  • @Dronescapes

    @Dronescapes

    Жыл бұрын

    @@jbradley8659 Ju-87 D-3

  • @iffracem
    @iffracem Жыл бұрын

    Respect for saying "you may not know about" in your title, and not being like many content creators that assume the viewer is a dunce.

  • @Dronescapes

    @Dronescapes

    Жыл бұрын

    👍🙂 thanks!

  • @salvagedb2470

    @salvagedb2470

    Жыл бұрын

    Fuckin Luv'it..Huuuzhaaar!..

  • @salvagedb2470

    @salvagedb2470

    Жыл бұрын

    @@martinbrode7131 Your about right there.

  • @KyleCowden

    @KyleCowden

    11 ай бұрын

    The medevac role was something I definitely didn't know.

  • @Moonman63
    @Moonman63 Жыл бұрын

    I’m so glad there are so many videos w/ Eric Brown , he had so much to say worth hearing.

  • @attilakovacs6428
    @attilakovacs6428 Жыл бұрын

    In 1944, my father was bombed by a Stuka. A curfew was in effect near the village of Kaba due to the Yugoslav partisan attack the previous day. He was 15 years old then, and they went out into the village. Wondering what happened in the night attack? A Stuka with a Hungarian insignia circled the sky. They didn't care about him because he's Hungarian. But suddenly they heard the screeching of the plane! They looked up to see him drop the bombs. They cut themselves to the stomach, but the air pressure still worked. My father's friend was blown meters away by the shock wave and shrapnel went through his wrist. They bandaged the wound and went home, of course without telling the parents. Later it turned out that the brother of my father's friend had put the bombs on the Stuka. Because it was the ground crew. He said that partisans were bombed in the area of Kaba. My father was seen as a partisan.

  • @stevelewis7263
    @stevelewis7263 Жыл бұрын

    As a child in the 1960's I actually saw jU 87, jU 88, Boulton Paul Defiant at an airshow, they were on a static display

  • @vincentiusa

    @vincentiusa

    Жыл бұрын

    Thats what made me watch this too. Have the conversion ready, but wanted to know more about the inside of the pods. Pretty sure they were never really used though, and I mean ‘pretty’ as in: almost 100%

  • @modelermark172
    @modelermark172 Жыл бұрын

    What caught my attention was at 7:10 thru 7:35, where the wing mounted personnel pods were shown. I have been building plastic model aircraft for over half a century, and I remember seeing this in William Green's iconic work, "Warplanes of the Third Reich," published in 1970. If memory serves, that source said that this Stuka accessory had only reached a one-off, experimental stage, and was never mass-produced, (though the Airmodel company DID mass-produce a vacuform personnel pod conversion in 1/72 for the FROG Ju87D kit in the early1970's.) I realize that Mr. Green's book came out long before German Reunification, when more information locked away in the East finally became available to Western aviation historians, enthusiasts, and model builders. If anyone could point me towards more sources that show production versions of this variant (especially the interior of the pods) in use, I would greatly appreciate it. I actually have the "Airmodel 1/72 Ju87D Stuka Personnel Pod #119" conversion set that's been lying around in my stash since high school, and I'd like to build it, someday . . . . Thanks for making this interesting video!

  • @PaulP999

    @PaulP999

    3 күн бұрын

    In a book by the other great "Bill" - Bill Gunson, past colleague of Green - he has them down as two seat parachute dropped agent pods. (to me the BeeGees are Green and Gunson rather than the band!)

  • @novavroomvroom3435
    @novavroomvroom3435 Жыл бұрын

    I love these ww2 airplanes... These modern fighter planes don't grasp my interest... But these propeller planes to me are the best and it takes a real pilot with BRASS BALLS to fly them...!!!!

  • @iblockpuncheswithmyface1490
    @iblockpuncheswithmyface1490 Жыл бұрын

    Stukas were such badass looking planes.

  • @damienhunt4264
    @damienhunt4264 Жыл бұрын

    Excellent, Sir!

  • @Dronescapes

    @Dronescapes

    Жыл бұрын

    You will probably love these documentaries too: kzread.info/dash/bejne/goeGo8aTqrXfk8Y.html

  • @damienhunt4264

    @damienhunt4264

    Жыл бұрын

    @@Dronescapes appreciate that.

  • @lemmy6782
    @lemmy6782 Жыл бұрын

    I didn't realise how big they where until stood next to one .

  • @herberar
    @herberar Жыл бұрын

    This video is a master piece! Thanks a lot!!!!!

  • @Dronescapes

    @Dronescapes

    Жыл бұрын

    thank you Bernardo!

  • @sabrekai8706
    @sabrekai8706 Жыл бұрын

    Good video, learned a few things. Never knew about the K-47 or the various tail configurations that were thought of.

  • @tomrisar5492
    @tomrisar5492 Жыл бұрын

    I like the animations in this video, well done.

  • @Dronescapes

    @Dronescapes

    Жыл бұрын

    Thank you Tom

  • @johnmoran8805
    @johnmoran8805 Жыл бұрын

    Thanks! Good content. I really like the use of historical and animated clips to accurately demonstrate the subject.

  • @Dronescapes

    @Dronescapes

    Жыл бұрын

    Thank you John

  • @iskandartaib
    @iskandartaib Жыл бұрын

    3:41 - AH!!!! Now that makes sense. When I first came across this I thought the entire rear end of the fuselage would rotate 180 degrees around the longitudinal axis. 😄😄

  • @chubbydanny1999
    @chubbydanny1999 Жыл бұрын

    They have to add the super stuka in war thunder 😱😱😱

  • @GaddarKerimEU
    @GaddarKerimEU Жыл бұрын

    Thanks for this great video sharing with us 👌👌👍🫶🫶

  • @johnscarborough4746
    @johnscarborough4746 Жыл бұрын

    I've seen the one on display ar the Chicago Museum of science and history. It's supposed to be one of two remaining examples preserved. An impressive aircraft.

  • @elultimo102

    @elultimo102

    Жыл бұрын

    I wondered about that Stuka, since it reportedly fell a couple decades back. There was also a Spitfire hung near it. (I haven't been there since the early '80s).

  • @johnscarborough4746

    @johnscarborough4746

    Жыл бұрын

    @@elultimo102 it's the tropical variant captured in North Africa IIRC. And yes the Spitfire is still hanging next to it.

  • @beyondrecall9446
    @beyondrecall94468 ай бұрын

    Here, The Yugoslav Partisans, who were , I guess the only resistance grop to have it's own airforce during the war on it's own liberated territories of the country and used everything from donated British and Soviet planes to anything they captured, had captured a Junkers Ju 87 R-2 when it landed at an airfield thathad been taken by the Partisans. I went of to conduct bombing operations for the months to come, with the last known use was on the 26.May 1945. during the Battle for Odzak, the last battle in Europe.. There is another log dating to 28. May when it bombed German and Cetnik positions who refused to surrender. That was the last use of it in combat. Weird how the plane that was a symbol of terror and destruction at the beginning, and, kinda , started it all, was the same plane to end it... Ofc, with hastily painted Red Stars, while the original markings were still visible beneath (on the pictures). After the war, it was used for some more time and later given to the Technological University in Belgrade and cut up into small pieces. The engine was used to help create socialist Yugoslavia's first air tunnel.

  • @MONTY-YTNOM
    @MONTY-YTNOM Жыл бұрын

    Plenty of Stukas in the English Cannel

  • @nicolasroirand8011
    @nicolasroirand8011 Жыл бұрын

    Merci .

  • @GSSurry
    @GSSurry Жыл бұрын

    Impossible to hear the words because of the background music

  • @Eric-kn4yn
    @Eric-kn4yn Жыл бұрын

    1930s dive bombers were used by other nations too

  • @HarborLockRoad
    @HarborLockRoad Жыл бұрын

    Glad theyre not around today, as kids are eating pods.... 😁👍

  • @mrLumen2
    @mrLumen2 Жыл бұрын

    Stuka (ШТУКА) - on Russian its "valuable or useful item (stuff)"

  • @ferenacarotenuto9851
    @ferenacarotenuto985111 ай бұрын

    La traduzione della parola "dive" in "immersione" non credo sia corretta. Io direi "picchiata".

  • @marcintomaszek1167
    @marcintomaszek1167 Жыл бұрын

    Dobrze że już ich nie ma, szkoda że są nowsze tego typu chujostwa.

  • @mohandhanoa4797
    @mohandhanoa4797 Жыл бұрын

    Was the Fuckie Wolf 190 named after rapacious wolfs ?

  • @trevormillar1576

    @trevormillar1576

    Жыл бұрын

    Focke und Wolf was a machine-tool manufacturer before it built aircraft during Ww2; it still exists.

  • @elultimo102

    @elultimo102

    Жыл бұрын

    The FW-190 was one of the best fighters in WW2. I was supposed to be easier to fly, than the allies' planes.

  • @mohandhanoa4797

    @mohandhanoa4797

    Жыл бұрын

    @@elultimo102 But did it fuckie wolves ? That is the question ?

  • @trevormillar1576

    @trevormillar1576

    Жыл бұрын

    The RAF used the information gathered from the FW190 captured intact during the West Malling Incident to develope the Typhoon and Tempest fighters.

  • @TheGhost-gx5vd
    @TheGhost-gx5vd Жыл бұрын

    The Stuka was useless against Raf fighters spitfires and Hurricanes 8 .303 machine guns they lost alot of them when they bombed England

  • @roberthuehn6562

    @roberthuehn6562

    Жыл бұрын

    Well she was not a fighter-bomber. She was a dive bomber, and in this role she was quiet effective. To fight the spits and hurricanes was the role of the Me109 and Fw190.

  • @Taka_Yamato

    @Taka_Yamato

    Жыл бұрын

    Any slow moving aircraft would be vulnerable to fighters and AA. Take the B-17 for example. As heavily armed as they were they took heavy losses in the early stages of WII from the lack of fighter cover. These aircraft were designed for one purpose and excelled in it but were very poor in speed, and defense, among other areas

  • @attilakovacs6428

    @attilakovacs6428

    Жыл бұрын

    In the book Stuka, Valentin Mikula writes that one of the two Ratas on the Russian front was shot down by one of the Stukas, and then pursued. The Rata is a refugee. This could only happen if the rata pilot was a novice. The Stuka pilot is reckless. 😊

  • @sawomirdoraczynski9685
    @sawomirdoraczynski9685 Жыл бұрын

    A gdzie polskie tłumaczenie? Brak w zestawie, także automatycznego.

  • @Dronescapes

    @Dronescapes

    Жыл бұрын

    I added better ones, try now.

  • @steffenrosmus9177
    @steffenrosmus9177 Жыл бұрын

    Duri g the 1960ies sonw guys here made "fun" with an old Stuka typhoon to scare people who survived WWII. Itvstopped when someone bashed the crap out of them an detroyed the typhoon. Still wondering who did it😉😉

  • @Eric-kn4yn
    @Eric-kn4yn Жыл бұрын

    Stukas were dragged out to bomb bridge at remagen 3/45

  • @hervemuriel6994
    @hervemuriel6994 Жыл бұрын

    Et en français cela donne quoi?

  • @Dronescapes

    @Dronescapes

    Жыл бұрын

    Subtitles?

  • @lookup49

    @lookup49

    Жыл бұрын

    Apprend L'anglais.

  • @hervemuriel6994

    @hervemuriel6994

    Жыл бұрын

    @@lookup49 je ne collabore pas, j'aime ma langue natale

  • @davidhill1268
    @davidhill1268 Жыл бұрын

    One of the best dive bombers built. Too bad it was on the wrong side.

  • @robertoroberto9798

    @robertoroberto9798

    Жыл бұрын

    Not really, it was a slow machine which was poorly armed to defend itself.

  • @Collateralcoffee
    @Collateralcoffee Жыл бұрын

    All those aircraft "movies" are CGI... lame.

  • @SKILLED521
    @SKILLED521 Жыл бұрын

    My very least favorite place. Something beyond ugly and soulless.

Келесі