Is Six-Day Creation Compatible with Science?

Ғылым және технология

Biomechanical engineer Stuart Burgess responds to the claim that six-day creation is not compatible with modern science. Watch the full video and 15 more in our series "Beyond Is Genesis History?: Life & Design": isgenesishistory.com/product/...
Visit our website for more resources on creation science and young earth creation: isgenesishistory.com
Del Tackett, DM created the Truth Project in 2005 with @focusonthefamily
Stuart Burgess, PhD has been at @UniversityOfBristol since 1997 mainly working in the area of design optimization of mechanical systems and biomechanical systems.
#isgenesishistory #intelligentdesign #creationism #science #sixdays #design #universe #nature

Пікірлер: 83

  • @j.dieason7527
    @j.dieason752723 күн бұрын

    Science is wrong often, the Almighty is never wrong.

  • @HereIam-rg3vy

    @HereIam-rg3vy

    13 күн бұрын

    😂😂

  • @KingofHearts300

    @KingofHearts300

    3 күн бұрын

    Science isn't wrong. Society is wrong. Science is the observation and potential application of God's creation and how it affects humanity.

  • @aussieblue7132
    @aussieblue713222 күн бұрын

    AMEN AMEN thank you for your ministry of truth. 👍

  • @oldtimerlee8820
    @oldtimerlee882023 күн бұрын

    Thank you for these insights on the wonders of His creation. I'd never thought about air in that manner. Thank you, too, for your ministry. May God bless your efforts both individually and as an organization.

  • @janehelbert7551
    @janehelbert755123 күн бұрын

    I always thought that the first light entering the world was God stepping into His creation!

  • @addersrinseandclean

    @addersrinseandclean

    23 күн бұрын

    I think you are right. The Sun and moon was made on day 4. So how can there be morning and evening on the first day? The Hebrew word used for light is Ohr on day 1 but on day 4 it is Ma ohr source of light

  • @alantasman8273
    @alantasman827324 күн бұрын

    Exodus 20:11 for in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. Interestingly...God said that he rested on day seven as an example for man to rest and keep the sabbath day holy. God did not rest for millions or billions of years on day seven but for a literal 24 hr day. As John 1 1-4 states, the "Word" was the Creator of everything including the laws of nature....Anything done by the Creator is by definition compatible with science.

  • @bobclifton8021
    @bobclifton802121 күн бұрын

    Wrong question. It should be, is science compatible with creation.

  • @mreyno9646
    @mreyno964622 күн бұрын

    What are your (Is Genesis History) thoughts on the idea of the gap theory, that the 6 days was God making the earth habitable again for this new creature, namely man, after a cataclysmic destruction due to judgment?

  • @civilization57
    @civilization5723 күн бұрын

    The Law of Causality states that for every effect there needs to be a cause powerful enough and outside of the effect. Only a Supreme Being of Spirit meets that requirement, existing outside of time, space and the 3rd dimension that he created. God's laws trump man's theories.

  • @valentinmalinov8424

    @valentinmalinov8424

    23 күн бұрын

    God do not trump our knowledge - God standing for true knowledge. Three dimensions cannot form balanced space. The "Fabric of Space" is Six Dimensional = This is the "Six Days" creation. If you are interested to find the details, they are in the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"

  • @JeffThePoustman
    @JeffThePoustman23 күн бұрын

    Another question: "Is Science compatible with six-day creation?" (Note the capitalization.) God has clearly communicated that "in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them". (Exodus 20:11) As a result we can be certain that all genuine human knowledge (_scientia_) will accede to this. That is: observation will always yield evidence that, correctly understood, confirms what Scripture asserts. But is Science(TM) compatible with this? Currently, no. The trademarked pseudo-science is not knowledge, but a conflicting dogma, based on a contradictory assertion, that in 13.4 billion years the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them created themselves by chance. Either we believe what God said, or we believe what others say in opposition. Consequences follow, the least significant (yet still enormously important) of which occur during our tenure in this life.

  • @robertmccully2792
    @robertmccully279223 күн бұрын

    As a retired carpenter that built buildings, I know for certain nothing has ever built itself. There is a God Creator that built things so complex I cannot even start to comprehend the complexity. To deny creation is to deny the existence of God, so they have an excuse to deny responsibility for are actions.

  • @1bamabrad1
    @1bamabrad120 күн бұрын

    Something that crossed my mind not too long ago- God (our title for the Creator), is outside of time as we know it. Time is basically a unit of measurement between two points- in units of the speed of light- Since the sun, moon and stars were not created until the ‘fourth day’, time ,as we have defined by science ,did not exist as we now know it. The ‘I AM’ was (and is) the source of illumination-“ ‘I AM ‘the Light of the world”. So science has to find a way to agree with ‘I AM’, the Creator.

  • @diamondlife-gi7hg
    @diamondlife-gi7hg22 күн бұрын

    on day 5 it tells us that God created sea creatures first and science agrees with that possibility that life began in our oceans then it mentions birds or "flying creatures" next in the beginning of day 6 land animals were created and humans were created last. so in order of appearance its correct. Its not a complete list but its accurate. flying creatures like pterosaur existed before land animals like t rex.

  • @Leslie_Crich

    @Leslie_Crich

    7 күн бұрын

    Any correspondence is accidental, since the mainstream (evolutionary) timeline is based on erroneous assumptions and a misconstruing of the Flood-related deposits.

  • @chilkat_river
    @chilkat_river17 күн бұрын

    We can see stars forming, there are billions of new ones and old ones. I wonder why new stars and planets are still being 'created' ?

  • @Leslie_Crich

    @Leslie_Crich

    7 күн бұрын

    We donʼt see stars forming. What we see are bodies of cosmic material in various configurations. Evolutionary cosmologists have spun a tale of evolving stars, but the supposed process is too slow to be observed in any number of lifetimes. So it is easy enough to claim that various clumps of cosmic matter are stages in stellar evolution. Even generations of recorded observations would not be able to see the process happen if it were true.

  • @60dlau
    @60dlau23 күн бұрын

    What is science? Men look at the creation of God and out of the part of creation men could see and understandm they discover the pattern, rule of God used in His creation, they name the way to discover this fingerprint of God: science. God is not limited by the limited understand and perception of men. What the feeble mind of men cannot understand cannot make it wrong or unacceptable. It seems that God has a duty to show evidence to mankind what He said or done is right, it is a presumption of all God has done or said unless acceptance to mankind, This make man a judge on God, This is pure arrogance and foolishness. So the title in this video itself is misleading. Who are we to question God's deed?

  • @user-ic7ww4lo1m
    @user-ic7ww4lo1m21 күн бұрын

    Just because you really really really want something to be true does not mean you can take evidence of other things and bend it to mean what you want it to mean. Creationism is full of circular fallacies.

  • @NoiTuLovE64

    @NoiTuLovE64

    17 күн бұрын

    Everything in your comment except the last sentence defines Charles Darwin's thinking to a tee. I've heard a few atheist scientists say roughly the same thing, not including the last sentence, when describing Darwin.

  • @therick363

    @therick363

    6 күн бұрын

    @@NoiTuLovE64evolution is a scientific theory

  • @davidcochran595
    @davidcochran59523 күн бұрын

    Science is man’s poor attempt explaining Gods Creation .

  • @lonecar144
    @lonecar14423 күн бұрын

    God's Timeline “Why didn’t the disciples know that Jesus could feed the 4,000 after he had fed the 5,000 in the previous chapter?” Matt 15:33 (KJV) The so called “Christian” leaders of today teach that it is because they didn’t have faith. But the fact is that anyone involved in such a miracle and still skeptical would not only remember it but would be anxious for a similar situation to arise and prove it one way or the other. The discrepancy is put there to prod those with eyes to see (those sincere in search of truth) to investigate. The answer is given in the 16th chapter where Jesus speaks of the leaven of the Pharisees. Matt 16:6-12 (KJV). If that bread were literal then the disciples had every reason to believe that Jesus was being literal about the leaven and he therefore had no reason to chide them. But that bread being symbolic he chided them for not considering and taking to heart his teachings even after the third time of bringing up the subject. That teaching is what you are reading now. The bible (KJV) says that Jesus followed no will of his own but the will of God. John 6:38 (KJV) His life in the flesh is an ensample (representation) of God's laws. Jesus says that bread represents his flesh (his life) which in turn represents God's law (the bread of life). John 6:51 (KJV) Jesus’ death gave us the New Testament. Matt 26:28 (KJV) and Heb 9:16 (KJV) The New Testament brings meat to the scriptures, represented by the two fishes. The meat is the symbolic code and patterns that bring/bind all scripture in the bible (KJV) together. Heb 5:12-14 (KJV) It has been 2 thousand years since Jesus, so each fish represents 1 thousand years. In turn the five loaves of bread represent 5 thousand years that God gave his laws to man. 21 And they that had eaten were about FIVE THOUSAND men,…Matt 14:21 (KJV) This gives us a glimpse of Gods timeline. 7 thousand years ago Adam was kicked out of the garden. It also shows us that we are at the end of our time on this earth; 13 … and in the earthquake were slain of men SEVEN THOUSAND: and the remnant were affrighted, and gave glory to the God of heaven. Rev 11:13 (KJV) What does all this prove? It proves that the stories in the bible (KJV) aren’t meant to be taken literally. Also different parts of the hidden truths and patterns are written by different authors hundreds and thousands of years apart show that the bible (KJV) is the preserved word of God orchestrated, compiled, and translated by him and the Holy Ghost. It tells us that the bible speaks of itself and that it is for OUR admonition. 4 Neither give heed to FABLES and ENDLESS GENEALOGIES…1 Tim 1:4 (KJV) It tells us its message is hidden in the fables, parables, and stories through symbolism. And above all it gives us a major key in unlocking the hidden timeline and agenda of God. It tells us that the following verse is meant to be taken as literal. 2 Peter 3:8 (KJV) So taking 2 Peter 3:8 (KJV) as literal tells us that each creation day is 1k years. 5 .... And the evening and the morning were the first day. Gen 1:5 (KJV) Another thing that shows the creation days are 1k yrs. is if you take the phrase “the evening and the morning” and do a search verbatim of the whole bible (KJV) the only verse that comes up other than the creation days is Dan 8:26 (KJV) There is no way the events of the vision it speaks of could happen in one 24 hour period. Okay now to get down to it. When you make the creation days 1k yrs. long you will notice there is a big problem. There is no way that plants (created on the third day) could live 1k yrs. without the sun (created on the fourth day). The only way for this to work is to switch the third day with the fourth day. And you can’t just switch verses at your leisure; you need to get permission first. That permission is in the book of Revelation with the seven seals, (a pattern of symbols that REVEAL the second week of Gods timeline, the time of man's dominion). Remember we are looking to move the 3rd day. So when you look at the 3rd seal we read; Rev 6:5-6 (KJV) Balances are symbolic of the weighing of two things (choices). It’s giving us a choice, “A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny;” And in that choice it warns us, “and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine.” not to spoil the flow of things in your choice. So when we switch the 3rd and 4th days we see a definite pattern (a flow). On day 1 you have the one earth with no life created. On day 2 God splits the earth in two, still no life created. On day 3 God creates the sun and the moon and it is mentioned! that he also created the stars. Three cosmic entities, No life created. On day 4 God creates plants. One form of life created. On day 5 God creates fish and fowl. Two forms of life created. On day 6 God creates cattle, creeper, and beast. Three forms of life created. One would argue that man was also created on the 6th day making it four forms of life. But a cow is a beast, the redundancy put there again to prod those with eyes to see to investigate. When we go to Matt 25:31-46 (KJV), we see that sheep are used to represent the righteous and goats are used to represent the sinner. When we go to Ezek 34:17 we see God judging between cattle and cattle and between rams (the righteous) and goats (the sinners) making cattle represent the only ones left the innocent. Not because they didn’t do anything wrong but because at the creation they didn’t know of God’s laws. Therefore three forms of life created on the 6th day, man (cattle), creeper, and beast. And we can go further with this creation of man. In Gen 5:2 (KJV) God calls “their” name Adam, meaning more than one. When we go to Rev 17:15 (KJV) we see that waters are used to represent peoples, and when we go to Gen 2:11-14 (KJV) we see the creation of the four races of man represented by the four rivers. And this story of the creation of the four races is only given once, which means that the story of Noah’s flood is parable also. So when we go to 2 Peter 3:5-6 (KJV) when it speaks of the earth being overflowed with water it is speaking of the earth in the first day of creation. It also mentions that there was life on it before it was overflowed, similar to a vivarium, or a prep-station. Let's do a recap: God overflows the earth with water, then after 500 years of darkness (called the evening) God says (speaking to the heavenly host) “let there be light” or to paraphrase [lets go to work]. Then for 500 years (called the morning) God and the heavenly host start setting the foundations of the earth, such as putting the continents and their rich resources in strategic places. Then God lets the earth settle for 500 years, being the evening of the second day. Then the morning of the second day God splits the earth in two. Then 1k years later he creates the sun and the moon and like I said it is mentioned that he created the stars also, not necessarily in that 1k year day. Then 1k years later he creates plant life, 1k years later fish and fowl, 1k years later man (cattle), creeper, and beast. And God and the heavenly host rested from physical labor the last day of the first week of God’s timeline. An observation of note, water is an accelerant of decay, and the earth was overflowed with water for 3,500 years. And the calibrations of calibrations that need to be calibrated before an accurate reading can be given make carbon dating iffy at best. But no matter, just because you know the age of something doesn’t mean you know its history. Just because something is buried in 70,000-year-old mud doesn’t make that thing 70,000 years old. Just as it took 7 one-thousand-year days for the creation, God allotted 7 one-thousand-year days for man's dominion on this earth (the seven seals). All glory to God. Amen

  • @thomasdykstra100

    @thomasdykstra100

    22 күн бұрын

    Wow! You know, you could retire on the sales of your flannelboard kit! All glory to you!

  • @lonecar144

    @lonecar144

    22 күн бұрын

    @@thomasdykstra100 ? I did not elicit any glory. It is the teachers of the masses (the heaped) 2 Tim 4:3-4 (KJV), that glean temporal fame and monies from those with itching ears, teaching parables as literal and turning them into fables to those who cannot grasp the full impact of Matt 13:10-11-15 (KJV). The truth exists whether or not you or I live or not. It is the Spirit of God that teaches me, and if not me there would be another, and if not you there would be another. As I said before, All glory to God. Amen

  • @ShallStandForEver

    @ShallStandForEver

    9 күн бұрын

    I'm continually amazed at how badly people (who claim to be of faith in Christ Jesus) butcher the Holy Scriptures with nonsensical interpretations.

  • @johnmartin4650
    @johnmartin465023 күн бұрын

    No everything was not created in six days……It’s an ancient way of describing the cause of all things. That cause being the God of the Old and New Testament . Some aspects of evolution cannot be denied . After all what is a hundred million years in the “ mind “ of God ( a dream or as yesterday when it is past ).

  • @kennethschweighardt4920
    @kennethschweighardt492022 күн бұрын

    This is very flawed. When he was talking about light.. he mentioned the sun on day1. The sun was not created on day 1. Wish you guys could really get it together.

  • @valentinmalinov8424
    @valentinmalinov842423 күн бұрын

    Six days creation is a symbolic way to explain our ancestors the Universe. It is the same if you want to explain Quantum Mechanics to a 5 year old kid. If you are interested to find the connection of world religions and science, I will recommend the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"

  • @forestgiest1380
    @forestgiest138019 күн бұрын

    We find fossilized coral reefs with hundreds of thousands of years of growth cycles.

  • @user-bv3cl2cl8b
    @user-bv3cl2cl8b20 күн бұрын

    Can single cell life spring forth and evolve from a perfect puddle of elements from the periodic table? Not . The evolution theory is the greatest lie perpetuated on humankind. An hour ago was removing the bones from a turkey I slow cooked. Every bone was unique and functioned with precision with the other bones. The vertebrae was amazing with a perfectly sized hole for the spinal chord to pass through. And to think it started as an egg and ended up as a fully functioning turkey with male and female; able to run, fly and reproduce. The evolution theory is the Greatest lie ever concocted against the Creator of all we see and experience. 🌎

  • @therick363

    @therick363

    6 күн бұрын

    Sigh. Yet another creationist who doesn’t understand the difference between abiogenesis and evolution. Also, how is a scientific theory a lie…..??

  • @wangchung8134
    @wangchung813422 күн бұрын

    Is science compatible with the 6 day creation? Nope.

  • @iceman850none5
    @iceman850none522 күн бұрын

    A literal translation of Genesis was not the authors intent

  • @thomasdykstra100

    @thomasdykstra100

    22 күн бұрын

    Then what IS the intent...and HOW did you determine that?

  • @ShallStandForEver

    @ShallStandForEver

    9 күн бұрын

    Jesus Christ disagrees with you. I side with Him.

  • @HeatherMerrell
    @HeatherMerrell23 күн бұрын

    That's very sweet. If you believe the creation story in the Bible then you believe that there is a firmament. The sun is not light years away. Also. One day for God who is outside of time is 1000 years to us. Literally says that in the word also

  • @roydodds3693

    @roydodds3693

    23 күн бұрын

    Hi Heather, Are you saying you do believe there is a firmament? The Sun is not light years away, but about 8 light minutes away, 93,000,000 miles in old money. The observational evidence from our own planet, solar system and the wider universe totally debunks the Story of Creation. 6,000 years is still a very short time geologically and astronomically.

  • @godsbeautifulflatearth

    @godsbeautifulflatearth

    23 күн бұрын

    Yep. Also the Earth is Flat, Stationary and Non-Rotating; Immovable, fixed on pillars and under the Firmament which separates the waters above from the waters below.

  • @HeatherMerrell

    @HeatherMerrell

    23 күн бұрын

    @@godsbeautifulflatearth the earth is not flat exactly. But yes it does not spin and only moves at the hand of God..and the waters are separated. Above the firmament is the Throne which is separated by fire and a crystal structure

  • @civilization57

    @civilization57

    23 күн бұрын

    The "firmament" was the air/atmosphere in which life exists. As the Bible says, there was water above us in the clouds and water below us under ground. BTW, did you know, that water is only manufactured in two places: in a star and in the liquid mantle of a planet. So God made water below the firmament and, during Noah's flood, it broke out and flooded the earth. How did Iron Age people know this unless God told them!

  • @roydodds3693

    @roydodds3693

    23 күн бұрын

    @@civilization57 water isn't manufactured, it's a result of hydrogen and oxygen reacting together. Your car engine makes it when drive, as do you when your cells use carbohydrates to produce energy, ie all the time. Water is found almost everywhere in space, but as the product of the first and fourth most abundant elements in the universe this isn't surprising. All the oxygen in the universe was made inside stars as they evolve away from the main sequence. Very little of this was known in the iron age, which I guess is the reason it's not mentioned in the Bible.

  • @bearbones4347
    @bearbones434723 күн бұрын

    Why did u delete a lot of ur informational in full ???

  • @Torby4096

    @Torby4096

    23 күн бұрын

    To make a short video. They have TONS of videos if you want more detail.

  • @paulwright6947
    @paulwright694724 күн бұрын

    So much of your video, is Genesis history is so good. But its such a shame you don't apply the same standard when it comes to God's amazing geocenteuc creation. This stationary nonrotating plain we live on and biblical cosmology. I'm sure it must grieve His heart to see you show those CGI cartoons by the proven liars of NASA and monkeymen scientiests and attribute them to His creation, making a mockery of Psalm 19:1 and Romans 1:20. Job 38:14 The earth takes shape like clay under a seal; its features stand out like those of a garment. Romans 3:4 Let God be true but every man a liar. God declared in His word that the earth is immovable that can't be moved, that it sits upon the pillars of the Lord. In the first chapter of Genesis God said that He created a firmament and placed the sun, moon and stars inside of it for light upon the earth. In the second chater the first verse He declared that He was finished with creating the heavens and earth and the hosts thereof. So much for your counterfiet heliocentric lie of an everexpanding infinite universe. Infinite belongs to God only. The model you prioritize as teuth is satans counterfiet to put doubt into the hearts and minds of millions as to the inerrancy of the written word of God, hiding His handiwork The heliocentric luciferian, Copernican, Jesuit, Free Mason Counterfiet is not just contrary to God's word here and there but 100% directly opposed in every detail. There is much evidence today that proves we don't live on a spinning ball. Heliocentrism denies the existance of God, Geocenteism demands a Creator/Designer yet you twist God's word like a pretzel to make it fit the godless nattative of this world. Please re-research. God bless you, Paul

  • @HeatherMerrell

    @HeatherMerrell

    23 күн бұрын

    I concur. When people find out what lies they've believed they'll be amazed. I also added in my comment that 1000 years to us is a day to God. So creation of earth in our time took 6000 years.

  • @roydodds3693

    @roydodds3693

    23 күн бұрын

    Paul have you ever been to Australia? An amazing country, and one (of many) that it is totally impossible to see Polaris, the Northern Polestar from - explain?

  • @paulwright6947

    @paulwright6947

    23 күн бұрын

    @roydodds3693 Polaris is directly above the N pole. Australia's about vfc the furthest in the southern hemisphere as you can go without being Antarctica. With the understanding that we are on a flat plane and the laws of perspective and that the sun, moon, and stars are inside the firmament much closer just as the word of God declares. It m.j makes perfect sense. Everything about flat earth m.h makes po perfect sense whereas heliocentrism is one outrageous theory built upon another, of which most are not provable by empirical science. (Testable repeatable with the same demonstrable results.) To answer your question, no I haven't been but would sure like to. And yes it's very beautiful. It takes time to study how both models work. Most "globers" know very little of what they blindly believe in. They forget we were them not long ago. I have studied for the past four years. Once you see it you can't unsee it nor would you want to. 2nd Timothy 2:15 (study) It takes a lot of study to undo a lifetime deception by the proven liars of NASA and monkey-men scientists. John 8:32 You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free. Why would God's people want to attribute satan's counterfeit to God's amazing geocentric intimate creation? Making a mockery of Psalm 19:1 and Romans 1:20? There is plenty of scientific proof that we don't live on a spinning ball, but the written word of God should be enough. The Bible always proves real science, not vice versa. Heliocentrism (the Big Bang) denies the existence of God. Geocentrism (biblical creation) demands a Creator Designer.

  • @paulwright6947

    @paulwright6947

    23 күн бұрын

    @roydodds3693 If you sincerely want to know the truth come to the word of God with an open mind that can be taught by the Holy Spirit, putting your bias aside, and ask the first four words of Romans 4:3 What does scripture say?... I can assure no one can read the bible without worldly influences and come away with heliocentrism. And remember Romans 3:4 Let God be true but every man a liar. I have many good resources if you are interested.

  • @civilization57

    @civilization57

    23 күн бұрын

    @@HeatherMerrell That's not what Peter was saying. He was describing God's patience and perspective.

  • @Elohimists
    @Elohimists23 күн бұрын

    No. Because the sun, moon and stars were Not made until the Fourth Day. Therefore, the first three ages could have been millions or billions of years. The First Light was the angels being born. Psalm 33:6 By The Word of Elohim the Heavens were made and by the breath of His mouth all their hosts. When Elohim said, Light Become! Elohim became Yahweh (Genesis 2:4) and His Words became The Light of the world. John 8:12

  • @ShallStandForEver

    @ShallStandForEver

    9 күн бұрын

    More butchering of the word of God. Please stop.

  • @Elohimists

    @Elohimists

    9 күн бұрын

    @@ShallStandForEver so you reject the scriptures presented. How can their be a morning and an evening without a sunrise and sunset?

  • @ShallStandForEver

    @ShallStandForEver

    9 күн бұрын

    @@Elohimists because the Holy Scriptures are silent on what the light source is, that doesn't necessitate me making the days into ages/epochs of time (that's ridiculous). So, right away your premise is faulty.

  • @Elohimists

    @Elohimists

    9 күн бұрын

    @@ShallStandForEver In the Beginning Elohim created the Heavens and the earth. And Elohim said, Let There Be Light! And Light became: The Light of the world. John 8:12 The Bright Morning Star. Revelation 22:16 Elohim became Yahweh (Genesis 2:4) and His Words became: The First Born of All Creation. (The Holy Spirit) Colossians 1:15 John 1:6-13 There came a man who was sent from God. His name was John. He came as a witness to testify about the Light, so that through him everyone might believe. He himself was not the Light, but he came to testify about the Light. The true Light who gives light to every man was coming into the world. He was in the world, and though the world was made through Him, the world did not recognize Him. He came to His own, and His own did not receive Him. But to all who did receive Him, to those who believed in His name, He gave the right to become children of God- children born not of blood, nor of the desire or will of man, but born of God.

Келесі