I'm amazed at the number of people on DJAudits KZread channel that are praising him and encouraging him to keep doing what he's doing. It used to be that these people just stood around with a camera and filmed a building until they got someone's attention. Now they have to drag drones into it and ruin another hobby for millions, even the ones that use drones for legitimate business work.

@rezhead

4 ай бұрын

I enjoy flying drones. DJ audits content has had no detriment on me whatsoever.

@rezhead

4 ай бұрын

I enjoy flying drones. DJ audits content has had no detriment on me whatsoever.

@user-fj6bz6mv8k

4 ай бұрын

We love him

@501sqn3

4 ай бұрын

Well I suppose that just goes to show how many arseholes there are out there 🤷

@CWK090

3 ай бұрын

@@rezhead It will when rules become far more restrictive because of people like DJ. Federal Aviation Regulations in the USA started out as a single page. Today the volumes of regulations are enormous.

I watched that video. The security guard tried deliberately to obstruct the flight and landing of the drone. The guard wasn't there when the drone took off but approached him knowing full well he was trying to land the drone.. You're picking on the wrong incident, IMO.

@taffman1

Жыл бұрын

As it was public land, the security guard could stand where he wanted, it is up to DJ Fraudits to operate his drone in a safe manner.

@UncleB52

Жыл бұрын

​@@taffman1 So if the security guard was stood outside on public land he wasn't technically doing his job, just harassing a member of public and any incident that occured on the site that breached security he would have no doubt been liable.

@stuartvale2901

Жыл бұрын

@@taffman1 Logical fallacy. The guard approached, knowing full well that there was a flight in place and with the clear intention of interfering. DJ WAS operating in a safe manner, it was the guard who intentionally entered the area and caused a hazard. And, despite what this video claims, the ANO does apply to drones and it IS an offence for a person to interfere with a drone pilot

@taffman1

Жыл бұрын

@@stuartvale2901 There is nothing in the Air Navigation Act requiring the guard to keep away, the onus in the Act is for the drone operator to fly safely, also, DJ may be in breach of ANO 241, i.e not to cause a nuisance, by continuing to fly over the property after being asked not, he could possibly be committing a nuisance, but that would be for the CAA to decide.

@jarfish1968

Жыл бұрын

Security on public land can walk where ever he wants too!!

i am a member of 3 model flying clubs and all members despise auditors and how they are endangering our hobby

If the law changes the rights for the public to photo in public will make everyone with a smart phone effectively breaking laws. This then will effect companies,shops and other businesses who film people with security cameras!

@Renegade1127

Жыл бұрын

and that includes the police.

@DairyNZ

Жыл бұрын

Don't forget news media. We'd end up living in a communist state where the media couldn't publish anything about any business or person without state approval.

@JamesWho1

11 ай бұрын

they will make it so you have to have a vailded reason or something

@markdavies9636

11 ай бұрын

People need to wake up as this country has removed peoples freedom of speech and now has the largest surveillance camera system in the world.! iTS NOT China we should be worried about!

@tonymurphy8774

7 ай бұрын

That will never happen, it's impossible to enforce. We can't even get the police out for burglaries where I live.

Dj is a 🔔 end going out to pick fights! I hope he gets what’s coming

@rezhead

4 ай бұрын

OO check you tough guy🤣

@danieldavies2759

Ай бұрын

How is he being a tough guy?

All these people that call themselves "auditors" appear as though they all have an axe to grind with authority figures, it's like they're trying to get one up on people and prove themselves. They come across a little pathetic tbh.

@501sqn3

4 ай бұрын

Couldn't agree more 👏

@user-fu5ed4qe7y

3 ай бұрын

That’s an understatement

The reason why they don’t sue is because it’s legal to photograph or record anything you can see from a public place.

@aireboat7988

Жыл бұрын

In general it is, but there ARE several exceptions. "AB" the UKs most popular auditor was convicted of filming INTO Wellingborough Courthouse two years ago. He was on a public footpath outside.

@Nigfis

Жыл бұрын

@@aireboat7988 ""AB" the UKs most popular auditor was convicted of filming INTO Wellingborough Courthouse two years ago" Are you sure that is factually accurate? I searched but got no hits.

@aireboat7988

Жыл бұрын

@@Nigfis He was convicted at Northampton court in May 2021. A Google with his words -"reda", "bouadi" and "clifton" usually brings it up. Some news reports say he was "inside" the building, but he wasn't, he was outside, filming into it.

@Nigfis

Жыл бұрын

@@aireboat7988 Thank you.

@chrisatye

Жыл бұрын

Interested in your opinion on this. Section 76 of the Civil Aviation Act states ‘No action shall lie in respect of trespass or in respect of nuisance, by reason only of the flight of an aircraft over any property at a height above the ground which, having regard to wind, weather and all the circumstances of the case is reasonable, or the ordinary incidents of such flight, so long as the provisions of any Air Navigation Order and of any orders under section 62 above have been duly complied with’. Now, DJ isn’t flying over - he’s hanging around filming. Therefore, in my view, he’s in breach of this act and as such is liable to civil prosecution for trespass. Certainly agree that as a business he’s subject to the GDPR regulations, and sooner or later he’ll get his backside sued. Can’t wait1

dj and others dont make these people act like twats they do it with out any help at all

@johngibson2356

2 ай бұрын

That is his soul purpose is to get people to be confrontational .Because if he knows what he can do why not just do no need to go near them or show your presence because DJ is a d---

This guy obviously doesn't support Drone flyers / photography/ auditors. What a load of pony and trap.

@Hangmanaudits

Жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

That security guard was unlikely to let him land the drone safely. So he tried to land it into his hand quickly, given those circumstances what else could he do other than hover the drone above until it ran out of battery. The security guard knew full well he was preventing the safe landing of the drone.

@patthewoodboy

Жыл бұрын

and hes a security guard for the site, hes off site so has no jurisdiction.

@patthewoodboy

Жыл бұрын

@Dji Audits hes at work , if he leaves the site is he still at work ?

@kensukadventures628

Жыл бұрын

take drone up to a safe height, walk off site so guard is happy then land drone.

@taffman1

Жыл бұрын

Legally DJ is responsible for the landing of the drone, the guard had no obligation to move.

@kensukadventures628

Жыл бұрын

@@taffman1 This, really... Imagine if he was driving a car and someone stepped in the road, would he just run him over and blame the person for being in the road? A sensible driver would see the problem ahead and slow down, assess then avoid the trouble either by waiting till they pass or moving around it at a safe distance.

GDRP? Did you mean GDPR?

Every work place in Britain needs to display this simple notice in staff canteens and notice boards . " If you see ANYONE filming without prior arrangement DO NOT MAKE EYE CONTACT ! DO NOT SPEAK ! DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE !" Every action gets a reaction , auditors know that no one likes being filmed . Zero reaction will make very dull content on the videos . Who really wants to see what the outside of a Biscuit factory or an Amazon warehouse looks like on the outside? If workplaces like those were so interesting there would be coach party's outside of every factory.

@TheHarrybo1

11 ай бұрын

Won't ever happen these people are so full of shit their egos won't allow them to walk off

@BrewM12s

8 ай бұрын

Or start pumping out the Beatles through the PA system so they would get a copyright strike on the video so then couldn’t use it

@dunckywakwak

3 ай бұрын

​@BrewM12s make sure the businesses have a licence to broadcast music first though!

U consent to being filmed when you walk over to the camera in a public place case closed

@TheLowerIntestine

3 ай бұрын

Utter pish.

If you walk up to someone with a camera in a public place (which these nosey businesses, disturbing members of the public armed with a camera not a gun) you are giving consent to be filmed. That numskull walked into to the drones flight path. We have to use our brains.

@kruzza

Жыл бұрын

@Gary Brown think about it. You can't walk into the line of sight of a camera and complain about being filmed. Make it make sense.

@kruzza

Жыл бұрын

@Gary Brown rubbish, go back inside your office. If your not criminals, why does a member of the public with a camera bother you. Grow up. Woke karens

@kensukadventures628

Жыл бұрын

you cannot walk into the flight path of a drone being flown by a competent safe and legal drone pilot.....

@DMC888

Жыл бұрын

@@kensukadventures628 of course you can. Doing exactly what this guy did to prevent him from landing.

@kensukadventures628

Жыл бұрын

@@DMC888 Nope. you keep the drone safely out of harms way (preferably not having flown it if denied permission in the first place). Then you move of their land to a far away place where they do not regard you to be an issue and land it safely then. You do a risk assessment before flight also, and part of that would be realising if you have been refused permission someone might get arsey with you when you do fly - making it unsafe and stupid to fly in the first place.

They just trying to anoy people and get views from It he’s an absolute bell end . Get it in public but people can just come and bug you are work with a drone it’s ridiculous

Dogs should be on leads for a start 😂

DJ audit has lied to the police regarding knocking a young child over with his car there is a video at the moment on KZread with the footage from his own live stream that he was doing at the time, you can clearly see the DJ pulled away when the lights were on red amber. And according to highway code you're not supposed to pull away from a set of traffic light until the light goes green

@Firefly_UAV

9 ай бұрын

I have heard of this. I hope the child is ok

@sobek_2012

9 ай бұрын

@@Firefly_UAV yes this happened about 2 and luckily the child is ok. But the fact is DJ lied to the police, vestal time for it to go to court he may be indicted for it

@Firefly_UAV

6 ай бұрын

Things like that have a habit of catching up in the end

@unko2774

Ай бұрын

@@Firefly_UAV and if they dont then yall will have been proven wrong right?

@fredbloggs545

26 күн бұрын

Because nobody ever goes on Red/Amber...except everybody... When you watch the video there is 1 second between Red/Amber and Green. The cyclist flew through red.

These auditors are a joke, they need to stop their nonsense and get a real job. Absolute jokes.

@unko2774

Ай бұрын

bet u work at mcdonalds lol

@danieldavies2759

Ай бұрын

​@@unko2774Haha! Aww that was funny..Really funny actually..Your amazing

@alans9806

17 күн бұрын

They suck you in though

imagine if that drone had hit the security guard's head, it would have gone "frrrt" and the security guard would have been fine! 😂

Thankfully for those of us that wish to live in a relatively free country I believe you are very wrong in your analysis. The organisations that would want to protect the rights of DJ Audits, I believe, would have bigger legal departments than those that would want him taken down. If profiting from exercising your rights becomes unlawful, then we have a lot more to worry about than DJ Audits. Companies like Google (street view) has excellent legal departments, as does all those media companies (BBC). I’ve been watching auditing videos from around the world including the UK for the past 15 years. Over that time, I’ve seen a positive change in the way the police and the courts treat public photography and data protection. The law is very simple, members of the public do not need a permit, licence or permission to take photographs or videos in a public place and the police do not have a general power to stop you from doing so. You're free to take photographs for personal and commercial use so long as you're not causing an obstruction to other person. DJ Audits owns the copyright to all his videos and is free to upload it to KZread and collect advertising revenue. This should not be confused with using someone’s image to sell or promote a product, which is clearly very different. Journalists are, to a certain extent, exempted from the application of the GDPR. Does DJ Audits video contain a message, an opinion or an idea worthwhile to be communicated to the public: that is the question? Your very video analysis of DJ Audits and this comments section would be in support of him being a journalist. I see the BBC published a story on DJ Audits when he was arrested, it has his image, full name and town of residence. The same law that protects the BBC, is the same law that protects DJ Audits. Someone distracting a drone pilot or allowing yourself to be distracted by a member of the public in a public place, may not be the fault of the person causing the disturbance. However, much like a passenger grabbing a steering wheel while you are driving, physically touching a drone pilot while they’re operating a drone, could see you being held liable for any damage that ensues. No one is taking our rights away any time soon. Journalism and public photography are here to stay. Maybe instead of funding a legal department these companies should pay their staff to attend regular public relations courses. Looking at the current price of lawyers, it would probably work out much cheaper.

Yes, dj is too pushy for my liking and also overconfident

@Man_fay_the_Bru

20 күн бұрын

For someone with his voice he is wayyyyy over confident

One thing I hate about these auditors is that they go too far, sometimes they look for attention. Two wrongs don’t make a right. DJ Audits sometimes goes too far like pushing an old guy who was just doing his job, and that’s not right. If he spoke politely, maybe things would go south. Also, when the police are doing their job being nice and speaking to audits, all the Police are doing is being nice and auditors just attacking them… allow it.

@kissofjudaz

8 ай бұрын

They always look for confrontation.

I think there are worse auditors than DJ Audits.

i think some of these ‘audits’ have exposed a lot bad practices especially from the police, which is concerning to say the least.

Stop giving government more power ffs

@Hangmanaudits

Жыл бұрын

❤

At a recent audit, DJ got upset, when a day or so after the video was posted one of the people in the video made a privacy complaint to KZread and DJ had to blur that man's face out, then a couple of day's later, the other man in the video made a similar complaint, so he had to blur him too. These actions caused DJ to whine like a little woke girl.

@---wl3bi

10 ай бұрын

Coming from a simp 😀😃

@cozzy1350

3 ай бұрын

​@@---wl3biyou don't even know what simp means, do you?

@unko2774

Ай бұрын

you sound pretty "woke karen"yourself there lol

@spacebound1522

6 күн бұрын

Pretty rich when you consider he doesn't like to show his own face too

DJ Audits definitely isn't hated. You want more restrictions. Dj also has commercial insurance, so there goes that "fact" of yours

You TOTALLY misrepresented DJ I live in the states and have watched him for some time. I know that you know the guy who stuck his head in the way did it on purpose and his mate STOLE DJs property. He doesn't need permission

And if that member of the public places themselves in danger by standing directly underneath a drone that is descending it would suggest that they themselves have made the decision to ignore health and safety regs, the most important being that a person should not place themselves in a harmful situation.

@Hangmanaudits

Жыл бұрын

Exactly

@markw1915

9 ай бұрын

What if that person is deaf and cant hear it? Its not always as simple as it may seem from the outside. It ALWAYS the operators responsibility, just like the driver of a vehicle, the onus is on the driver/rider/pilot etc, and so it should be. Members of the public aren't in control of these machines so how can they be held responsible if the operator CHOOSES to continue to drive/fly/ride etc and harms them in any way and that includes distress or harassment etc, meaning no contact has to even be made. Just the fear of looking up and seeing a drone decending is more than enough. Most drone operators are responsible people, but it only take a few to spoil it for everyone, and most of those appear to be 'auditors' out for likes and clicks. The CAA have already begun to change what can and can't be done with regards drones, and it's only going to get worse. The Govt are being helped to erode our way of life by these types of 'auditors', which lets not forget was to see how PUBLIC money was being spent, not how members of the public or PRIVATE companies operated. Thanks to these 'auditors' our way of life is changing and not for the better, that is an unarguable fact, and that why so many people hate them. Anyone with a camera can be a 'Citizen Journalist' as DJ calls himself these days, but we dont all go around doing what he does do we tho eh. With that amount of followers it could be argued (in court) he is now a 'public figure' and as such should hold himself to a higher standard than us low life mortals, then when the judge sees his channel decides to take his freedom away, something he and any one who has any large number of followers seems to have overlooked. His 'provocation' channel should be deleted, it has little to do with 'auditing' in the real sense of the word, and never really has imo.

@unko2774

Ай бұрын

@@markw1915 so if i want to get a driver in trouble i could just jump in front of their car then and they are screwed right?

While I disagree with dj a lot, this guy wasn't going to let him land anywhere and wasn't it assault?

@eggymayo3271

Жыл бұрын

Don't be a cunt and you won't get treated like one. Simple as that

He has upset so many businesses? The security people in these businesses normally don’t know how to deal with the public and it is their stupidity and incompetence that shines through! Considering how many he does, and is insured, he has seldom put anyone in harms way.

Obviously wasnt the end because they're still going on strong.. stronger than ever. No end to audits, guys.

Calling yourself a pilot for flying a little toy drone is like me calling myself a surgeon for putting a plaster on someone's finger!

@flyerh

Жыл бұрын

It’s the CAA that use the term Pilot in the legislation concerning drones.

@Picskull

Жыл бұрын

@@flyerh I'd ignore him, he calls himself Steve Bird but i bet you he doesn't even have any wings.

@Hew.Jarsol

Жыл бұрын

Operator

@CivicMikey

Жыл бұрын

@@flyerhthey need to make rules for frauditors

@terrycoles9079

10 ай бұрын

Steve Bird, Pilot is exactly what they are when flying a drone. Just shows your intelligence level!!

If you encounter one of these idiots the best way to screw them over and ruin their trip and video is to get your phone out and play a song from your music playlist which they'll have to mute because of copyright

@gutto3178

Жыл бұрын

Ur wrong

@fullsteamahead5109

Жыл бұрын

@Gutto 31 nope I'm not. You're gonna come up with the 'FAIR USE POLICY' crap... but guess what you're wrong because there's another way involving copyright music being played to ruin these losers videos... you're obviously one of the fauditors fan boys that worships the ground they walk on....oooo dj fraudits is my hero.

@notmanynamesleft

Жыл бұрын

Doesn't work my man.

@fullsteamahead5109

Жыл бұрын

@notmanynamesleft OK fan boy, Ill let you believe you're right 🤦

@notmanynamesleft

Жыл бұрын

If you encounter one of these so called idiots, don't be a nob,maybe have a quick chat and be polite as that doesn't cost anything,rather than being a miserable moody tool?

So what do you call some one who drives a car, wether he owns a driving licence or not?

What is his business called? I've looked all over Google and can't find anything

@Hangmanaudits

Жыл бұрын

Why u so concerned

@river1927

Жыл бұрын

@@Hangmanaudits why are you so concerned mr nobody has ever heard of you ?

@Hangmanaudits

Жыл бұрын

@@river1927 what are u on about the whole time I've been on KZread I've only worked on it for six months but thanks for your input 💪

@river1927

Жыл бұрын

@@Hangmanaudits excuse me who are you? Some generic guy. Go create something unique instead of walking in others shadows, trying to be yet another auditor thinking your going to be the next AB 🤣. Helmet 🤣

@Hangmanaudits

Жыл бұрын

@@river1927 I don't do it for who I am . Why you so obsessed over who auditors are ? Next auditor I work and ear over 43 k a year 🤣 other peoples shadows no auditors have audited some of the places I've audited that's the beauty of it and u would not insult me to my face 💪

well said, couldn't agree more

If there are big legal budgets countering auditors activities why haven’t they taken any litigation. They’ve had enough time. Perhaps they realise there is nothing they can do legally.

@johngibson2356

Жыл бұрын

It's coming

@nicotoscani1707

10 ай бұрын

​@@johngibson2356if this does happen, then kiss your rights and my rights good bye for good .. the world will be a draconian hellhole with corruption and criminal behaviour of authority types re-hidden

@uptowndisco2

6 ай бұрын

still waiting@@johngibson2356

@nigelfairhurst9105

5 ай бұрын

​@@johngibson2356 Still waiting 😂

@johngibson2356

5 ай бұрын

@@nigelfairhurst9105 it will come watch this space

I drive a car on a public highway, which means im operating a vehicle in a public space so are you saying if a member of public wants to occupy that same space at the same time and purposly obstructs my vehicle same as the security guard purposly obstructed Djs drone (he knew he wanted to land there and moved to block it) so if a person saw me driving on a road and purposly moved into the road to block me am I at fault then if he was injured in an unadvoidable accident on my part but advoidable by him by not choosing to place himself in danger????????

@tajs476

3 ай бұрын

DJ audits could of landed his drone somewhere else and if you could of stopped your vehicle or moved out the way of the pedestrian then yes it would be your fault. It's like the just stop oil protesters, yes there's a case those protesters are causing danger but if you ran them over when you clearly could of stopped then yes you would be at fault.

@vengeezergaming5595

3 ай бұрын

@@tajs476 no just stop oil are not the same as they enter the highway to block it when its safe for them to enter, i meant if someone stepped into the space at the same point in time as i was going to enter so to purposely block me ie, step out at last second, if i was traveling at 20 - 30mph then like i previously said unadvoidable on my part, Granted the drone situation wasnt as close as that and in theory dj could of landed elsewhere however on the drones you set the take off point as home so when you want to land you hit home and drone lands automaticly slowly more accurately with more control ie safer, Also the security guard was obstructing the drone purposly and could of easily moved and moved to whatever area in which dj tried to land, Also the gaurd was doing what he was doing as he believed he was doing his job in the professional capacity as a security guard and was trying to excert his authority over a member of public in a public place for which he has no authority does he, just because one doesnt agree with what a member of public is doing doesnt give you the right to interfere does it???

@vengeezergaming5595

3 ай бұрын

At the end of the day the security guards job is to secure the site, it was a secure location with secure fencing, the guard was securing the enterence so unless anybody is damaging the perimeter fence or trying to gain unauthoried entery to the site then what the hell is he concerning himself with whatever members of the public are doing outside???

So it's been 6 months. Anything happened?

@Firefly_UAV

9 ай бұрын

Yeah, but not like I’d hoped. The CAA has launched a consultation which looks likely to remove the sub250g drone exemption because of ‘privacy and safety’ concerns. That’s a real shame as even though it will stop ‘auditors’ overflying without additional training and permission being granted by the CAA it will also affect the vast majority of other drone flyers too. The whole point of this video was to highlight where I think some are already breaking the rules and we don’t need more of the rules! There’s more info on the CAA consultation on my channel

@trickyfocus

5 ай бұрын

@@Firefly_UAV i hope so

@user-sb9kw1nj7t

4 ай бұрын

@@Firefly_UAVtakes an awful long time it seems cause it’s still legal

@bobbysime1372

3 ай бұрын

​@Firefly_UAV you are clueless.

@bobbysime1372

3 ай бұрын

It's been another 6 months and no nothing has happened and nothing rightly will

Let's gloss over the assult.

@jamesadams9611p

Жыл бұрын

​@@hibsboy9 personal space ? In public. 😂😂😂😂😂😂

@jamesadams9611p

Жыл бұрын

@@hibsboy9 can be. I've never seen an auditor in someone's face. The majority of what I've seen has been self important people approaching a man with a camera to insist they or a property is not filmed....

@jamesadams9611p

Жыл бұрын

@@hibsboy9 I see... 😂😂 definitely wires crossed. Must be my mistake.

@tc5042

Жыл бұрын

​@jamesadams9611 totally agree long live DJ, PJ and all the drone flying auditors, great guys .

@djaudit5583

Жыл бұрын

I’m fine sweet cheeks

6 months has gone. Auditing is alive and well. Anything to say?

No.. he's still popular and still going.

As a person who also had CAA approval what you say in general is spot on, new laws will come to restrict drones. However, nothing wrong with taking off and landing in public so long as safe to do so. The drone coming down on someone's head IS NOT acceptable in anyway. However the dog instance could be questioned why the dog is not under control. But again, why use a footpath! Crazy. I questioned it a long time ago, why is someone, making videos for income not subject to GDPR? OF COURSE THEY MUST BE! That's what GDPR is all about.

@fredbloggs545

26 күн бұрын

GDPR hasn't existed in the UK for a few years now. A company of less than 250 employees is unlikely to be subject to prosecution under the The Data Protection Act 2018 when their sole purpose is not about processing data. It is a company of one employee, it simply is not worth pursuing.

There are audits DJ has done where the people in the companies have been happy with his involvem ent.

@superfoxes7204

Жыл бұрын

1

@kensukadventures628

Жыл бұрын

There are people in the world who would pay other people to be whipped and punched. Does not mean you can go around whipping and punching people who don't want you to do it.

@johngibson2356

5 ай бұрын

yea and i bet that pissed him off

@TheLowerIntestine

4 ай бұрын

HAHA yes exactly.@@johngibson2356

He must of showed this guy up some how , he's trying to convince everyone it's wrong to do it

Total respect and totally agree “Auditors” when they are earning but suddenly “members of the public” when manipulating or arguing a point of law 😂. I bet when they put in a civil claim they don’t identify as auditors They manipulate and flex the interpretation of the law so their activities fit in. As for attitude well that’s a whole new conversation entirely Definitely not auditors full stop an auditor has the qualifications and authority to assess a field and whilst unannounced they identify themselves and are transparent in their purpose. This type of activity should either be illegal or they should be forced to be commercialised and subject to regulation. The most entertaining part for me is when they get told to get back in their box and they are challenged by the police. Too much disrespect for the police, security and mod of whom they would be the first to criticise if they didn’t challenge or act on a concern that could have avoided an incident.

2:29 “un involved person”. The security guard has purposely & intentionally walked into the drone operator to knowingly commit an assault knowing full well he is operating a drone. How on earth is he “un involved” ? You are talking out of your Gary Glitter !

@Hangmanaudits

Жыл бұрын

Yep

You sound a little jealous of DJ. In the footage I've seen thats confrontational, it's those who come out dictating that cause the problems. If you don't want to look foolish, then just ignore the auditors, no content, no views.

@tc5042

Жыл бұрын

Definitely 👍

@jackwatsonepic626

Жыл бұрын

Didn't they get jealous with Alex belfield when he got popular have you noticed they don't say nothing about PJ because he hasn't got many subscribers 🤔

At the start the guys who audit were doing it to prove that we can do xyz and people can't move you on. however over time I do feel DJ has got a bit antagonistic in his ways and looks for trouble, that shouldnt be the case. I apprecaite all they do for photography but they should antagonise people to provoke a specific reaction to engage.

@v8cool231

Жыл бұрын

Yes, some people are actually quite willing to help him, but in return for a bit privacy . Some even say to him "If you just make an appointment, we'd be happy to show you around" And he snaps back at them "I don't want to come your land, or talk to you, I just want make my video and leave" Don't be a dick, Mr Dicks.

The drone operator was attempting to land and the lunatic was basically blocking the landing site with his body. Imagine if someone was running around at the local airport runway blocking aircraft from landing. It should be treated the same way. Theres no expectation of privacy in public, therefore in public you are able to be used as a "unintended inclusion" in a video or photograph.

There is nothing wrong with responsible operators mitigating and flying from public land. Why are RAEs still teaching this absolute land owner’s permission narrative considering some people operating from private land sometimes fly even more unsafe high risk flights?. Choose a low traffic area. Fly the appropriate uav for the situation and have your emergency alternate landing area. In this instance DJ audits was totally wrong because he is clueless.

6:24 Upset businesses? I've watched most and a lot of them end very well. Those who don't usually don;t behave very well. I feel you are focussing the rage from some of the rougher styled auditors at the wrong person.

@Renegade1127

Жыл бұрын

Those 'rougher style' auditors hardly ever use drones anyway.

I’m all for the highlighting of entitlement, ignorance and preserving the few freedoms which we are daily losing. So yep, I’m for these guys, as long as they’re respectful, responsible, polite and calm. The other side of the coin is the violence and physical and verbal abuse these guys often take from simpletons and authorities. Is that a fair trade off I wonder? Street photography is a great way to preserve history. That’s why these local historian books sell so prolifically.

@davenz000

Жыл бұрын

This knob seems to hate D.J, who is pretty much the most knowledgeable and respectful of the lot.

@AYTAZED

Жыл бұрын

​@@davenz000. You do know Nigel dick is married? But he sounds bent.

@Hangmanaudits

Жыл бұрын

💪💪💪

@kissofjudaz

8 ай бұрын

If it really was street photography, not just a baiting exercise for clicks.

@kissofjudaz

8 ай бұрын

@@davenz000 It seems to be a fair and objective assessment of Mr Dick.

You make some good points, especially with GDPR. I quite like DJ and his work, but I do think that he is opening himself up for liability when he says that he makes money, even has said on occasion that it's his primary purpose. He has even said that to police.

And they still hear stronger than ever. Funny how you’re making content and money from dissing other content creators… the irony

I am a strong believe in standing up for our rights and believe photography is not a crime and can't be made one because people don't like it. This all started because a journalist was arrested for doing his job so the original reasons for all this was amicable and completely justified. Yes what it has become is questionable. You bet in 6 months they will still be here. I bet they will never fully go and the only change will be their faces. There are already new auditors on KZread already.👍

@abizeusuk

Жыл бұрын

Totally agree - 6 months, I don't think so.

@DronePilot01

Ай бұрын

​@@abizeusukeven if they lose the right to fly they will just carry on with their hand cameras like they did before they had drones.👍 I don't see them ever ending this battle but of course I could be wrong.👍

Someone can walk up to you if you’re mowing a lawn or riding a bike. Sorry but the guard knew what he was doing - he was the aggressor. With respect, this video smacks of jealousy to me.

@Hangmanaudits

Жыл бұрын

Correct ❤

If everyone just ignored sad people like him he wouldn’t have any videos he only does it for the confrontation which makes views

I wouldn't say he's hated at all - not with 114,000 subscribers and growing at a rapid rate. The security fella trying to head butt as it was coming down was plain stupidity on his own behalf.

@Hangmanaudits

Жыл бұрын

Guys a hater 💪

@johngibson2356

Жыл бұрын

most subscibe to his channel waiting for the slap he is overdue

@Hangmanaudits

Жыл бұрын

@@johngibson2356 clearly you know nothing 🤣

@johngibson2356

Жыл бұрын

@@Hangmanaudits Hangman people like you are just wind up merchants you beg for confrontation im afraid people like you will change laws on filming

@bolina163

Жыл бұрын

LOADS OF PEOPLE HATE DJ

Pj audits that was signing fake paperwork for training courses

@darrenross1807

Жыл бұрын

@@hibsboy9 type in Peter allsop court case

@darrenross1807

Жыл бұрын

@@hibsboy9 tells you pj court case number several people have asked pj if it is him and pj has kept denying it is him

@darrenross1807

Жыл бұрын

@@hibsboy9 sure it’s PJ but PJ is denying it is him

@Nellyontheland

Жыл бұрын

Proof or a link, please, or it is not him.

@superfoxes7204

Жыл бұрын

It’s true about PJ the case file is on Google for you to read

I see this clip is a year old , and DJ is still doing what he does, guess he wasn’t scared off .

are you working for the police?

Why have you only named him..dj? He is the only one that actually audits and reports the bad things to the company bosses and or the reception. Others i have watched are there just to antagonise just because they can knowing they will get a response. Especially that Power To The Proletariat All he does is turn up stand there knowing hes gonna get challenged. Sounds like a bit of jealousy to me. Keep going DJ good on ya man.

@taffman1

Жыл бұрын

This DJ continuously stands on private roads/paths claiming they are public, a one minute search on the Land Registry will show that most slip roads and paths leading of the main roads on estates are private property, and also most roads on business estates are private. He sets out to deliberately antagonise the company and its employees. I know of one company where he allegedly turned up, he was given a clear precise instruction, 'Get of our property now, or be removed'. He did not leave, and was very promptly picked up and ejected, he spouted he was going to sue, go ahead, our camera's are recording visual and audio and your refusal to leave will be played before the Courts, DJ never released his video.

@Rocky19577

Жыл бұрын

@@taffman1 thats why they do it so we watch the reactions and they get paid

@taffman1

Жыл бұрын

@@Rocky19577 Sadly yes

@taffman1

Жыл бұрын

@Tracy Tracy, Mr Nigel Dicks aka DJ, obviously has no Safety qualifications such as, NEBOSH or SMSTS, for if he had he would proudly boasting of them.

@Rocky19577

Жыл бұрын

@@taffman1 neither have i but common sense prevails

Guys like DJ audits will ruin things for responsible drone operators. Guaranteed

@Nigfis

Жыл бұрын

No. The government is busy removing our rights. What you mean is, you'll blame him whatever happens.

@takeapictureitlllastlonger5768

Жыл бұрын

Responsible drone operators that fly according to the law and drone regulations like DJ. Whats is yourt point? he is ALWAYS within the law.

@davidoliver2218

Жыл бұрын

I see no illegal behaviour from DJ. Good on him for his work.

"In my view, society has earned a rest from your activities."

So again, we have someone expressing their opinion (which he is entitled to do of course), but acting on feelings rather than facts. The reason that big business have not been successful in seeking damages is because he’s done nothing wrong. You’re merely inciting more division through speculation rather than supporting the fight against government and corporate overreach. But then that might be because you could be being paid to act as an agitator. You may not of course but it’s possible that you are given your stance. One questions why you would call into question a lawful activity the purpose of which is to publicise and highlight civil rights issues?

Your vid appeared in my feed. Had quick look in the comments still have not seen DJ Audits comments of your reply. Watching your vid again, I have no problems with you having an opinion about any auditors. However you stated that DJ Audits was negligence which in my opinion is a very bold statement to make. The modern law of negligence was established in Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562.

Firstly, let's look at some simple stats. You have 573 subs and DJ has over 110K! As for the video, it's crap mate. The guy was clearly in the way of the drone landing and if DJ had walked 100 meters away that guy would have got in the way again, you know that right? Common sense hopefully tells you that. On that alone discredits your video. Stick to creating good, informative and educational videos and not bashing other people who have a very successful channel and who have made a name for themselves.

@opaudits

Жыл бұрын

Well said

@mrteroo8953

Жыл бұрын

DJ (used to be) Audits is an annoying bellend. Targeting normal working people to be a smart arse.

@tc5042

Жыл бұрын

Well said these people giving them bad press are so jealous because the public love them and there content.573 subs to over 110 thousand says it all .

@joshexplores23

Жыл бұрын

Well said mate

@joshexplores23

Жыл бұрын

What a snowflake he is

Judging by nearly all the comments below I think you are wrong, he is not the most hated. Now GDPR and Tax may be an issue in the future but I guess DJ has that covered too. I get it may look suspicious to companies but DJ mostly tells them what he is doing and not to worry. But what right does the owner or a worker at a company have to tell him to stop filming and say it is not allowed when clearly it is? The best thing companies can do is what someone suggested below, do not engage with him or others and the videos will not be worth watching coz that is the only reason I watch them, for the reaction and for DJ to put some of the arrogant clowns in there place and educate them. The police know this and that is why they hardly ever turn up and when they do they educate the clowns.

When quoting laws such as 'Air Navigation Order Article 241 you need to read what it says and not what you think it says. “A person must not recklessly or negligently cause or permit an aircraft to endanger any person or property”. DJ did not recklessly or negligently cause or permit, he did everything in his power to do the complete opposite. No one can foresee the actions of an idiot interfering with a lawful activity. Deliberately walking into a drone operator mid-flight is not maybe an assault, it is an assault. As for your opinion that DJ was negligent, you are entitled to your opinion even though you’re wrong. As for the dog incident, it should have been on a lead, its owner did not have control of the animal and should be held responsible for any damage caused. Again ‘in your opinion’ DJ Audits is the most hated auditor in the UK. In my opinion, he’s the best auditor in the UK and a competent drone flyer.

If DJ is running a business, then surely GDPR applies to him as well?

@taffman1

Жыл бұрын

Contrary to what Auditors think, GDPR does apply to them.

On the scale of "Hate" I think your good self might rank higher than DJ Audits, who is tremendously popular.

@Nellyontheland

Жыл бұрын

I tend to agree. The good work that auditing has done for photography in public as a whole is phenomenal. To be happy that he has been doxxed is another issue. GDPR does NOT affect auditing in the same way as it does to companies.

@joshexplores23

Жыл бұрын

Nellyontheland well said

@juliandavies1974

Жыл бұрын

​@Nellyontheland most 'auditors' make money from youtube, hence they are a business. And need to follow gdpr laws.

@auditthis

Жыл бұрын

So was Hitler

@auditthis

Жыл бұрын

@@Nellyontheland What good work? You name me one instance where any law has been amended from people going out 'auditing'

It seems the only logical way around this, and to limit what people like DJ Audits does, is for landowners who actively don’t want drones flying over their properties to implement geo fences around their properties. That way they can choose who does and doesn’t fly. Anything outside that fence in public areas people can fly as they wish according to the law. DJ Audits rials people for a living. There’s nothing more to it really. Other than displaying his knowledge of drone laws to security guards who aren’t as knowledgable, his videos serve no useful purpose journalistically. It’s certainly not a traditional form of “journalism” but that’s the world we live in now. He’s clever, and is making lots of money in his niche, but his time will fun out I’m sure.

How do you know the drone wasnt 20ft in the air with the cam zoomed in and ive been a sole trader for 18 years... everything is most definitely not at risk

You should have watched the whole video. He purposely gets in the way to prevent it landing.

DJ and his ilk are not auditors of any kind. they just go out to antagonise security guards , factory workers and managers, the police etc for the sake of their youtube hit numbers. They know they have to engage with someone to make the video remotely watchable. They show no respect for most of the people the encounter that are just trying to do their jobs. If a factory manager says there is sensitive work going on at their premises then surely that should respected and not reply to with well im definitely going to put my drone over now, or well you should cover it up then and create privacy. Complete clowns most of these fake auditors and should be banned asap. A simple change in the law would stop this auditing,. It serves no purpose anyway.

@charlesdarwen3683

Жыл бұрын

Agree completely DJs a narcesistic fool

@daviddale3285

Жыл бұрын

Well said DJ audits uses working folk to line his pockets. His channel is reactive without the reaction you are left in most cases with a video featuring a carpark, a few skips and a roof. These auditors serve no useful purpose to anyone other than themselves. Easy to stop DJ and his ilk ignore them no contact nothing to watch other than a few skips, carpark, roofs.

@paullancaster7066

Жыл бұрын

​@@daviddale3285you're quite right, ignore these auditors and they be extinct within 6 months....but there's the catch. The video show that ignorant ( of the law ) managers, security and po lice CAN NOT let them do lawful things and interact. Their choice of action causes their problem. Law abiding folk have no such worries 😊

@stevetemplar

Жыл бұрын

LOL , you accuse them of soliciting a reaction, when all the workers need to do is what they’re paid to do, and mind nobody’s business but their own .

@charlesdarwen3683

Жыл бұрын

@@stevetemplar So when a person dressed up in black with a balaclave and face covering comes onto your site and talks to security then refuses to leave - you just ignore them? its only designed for one thing to solicit a reaction which has to be given. Do you really not see their game?

I'm against what he dose the way he speaks to the staff I can do what I want on that stupid bike another the mask that he wears I don't blame the company's phone the police but he just try to twist things when he's been told to move on and he refuse he needs a lesson on what's right and what's wrong plus he's got no respect

Why do these people provoke a situation? It will only lead to the law being changed affecting the rest of us.

I think these guys are great in no particular order. Auditing Britain, Power To The Proletariat, The Laughing Auditor and a whole lot more. DJ audits has been pretty good but IMO not as good as the other three mentioned. I have appreciated all the knowledge all the polite Auditors share, even the odd one or two with cheapy cameras. Good luck to them.

@aireboat7988

Жыл бұрын

PTTP and TLA are deluded morons. Trespassing photo baiters who haven't a clue about their true rights. They go out to annoy and antagonize people to feed their own deficient personalities. Polite auditors..!!!! When..did that happen? Auditors don't share knowledge, they share myths and fairytales, and false legalities. Watch this vid, there's a prime example - "It's a criminal offence to interrupt a drone operator" . DJ started that a few years back at Thorne in Doncaster if I remember rightly. Others picked up on it, and started using it. As usual, they don't have the intelligence to ACTUALLY check its validity before repeating it verbatim. And when you point out that they're wrong, you become a troll, hater, sausage, muppet, or whatever...I've been called them all. There IS a place for "proper" auditing, but most auditors simply use it as an anti establishment vehicle to vent their frustrations.

@MarriedToTheKGB

Жыл бұрын

You have the right attitude to them i think. They are not really harming anyone and provide entertainment and to some an insight of their rights

@floatingfreedom6091

Жыл бұрын

The point of auditing, as far as I can see it, is to showcase the entitlement and lack of cognitive thought around certain freedoms . I’m all for that.

@aireboat7988

Жыл бұрын

@@floatingfreedom6091 That was the general idea, when it first started in the USA. However, very few UK auditors stick to that now. Predominantly, its about trespassing and film baiting people, then gang mocking the reactions.

@CrazedFandango

6 ай бұрын

@@floatingfreedom6091 Or to generate revenue.

Have you considered presenting in a mask, it will save the 3 people who come across your videos from looking at you?

@tc5042

Жыл бұрын

😅😅😅

By your logic, he should have been sued and lost all his money.. been doing it for over a year, video daily. It's legal. He doesn't break laws. Companies making billions and not paying a penny in tax yet your more annoyed at the bloke with a drone trying to make them accountable for atleast some stuff 😂 Like do you get what I mean?

Ok but in your post it’s all If’s, could’s, potentially’s and maybe’s. Is there a reason why you haven’t gone to a solicitor to check your suggestions and claims of law breaking or illegalities like most of these auditors do in order to protect themselves within the law. If you are so sure that you are correct then why not spend a few quid and get a lawyer to look at your claims. Other than that it could just potentially sour grapes on your behalf as these guys are getting more coverage than yourself. I would genuinely like you to respond to my point like you asked the public to respond to your post. Regards

@Firefly_UAV

11 ай бұрын

Solicitors have no real knowledge on drone law, unless you go to a specialist who will give an expert opinion. I don’t know what lengths auditions go to in their research, but it seems a fair few have a misunderstand like DJ does (and some of the drone community too) around the ANO article 240. I have knowledge about drones and the law around them having trained to GVC level. I feel confident the Air Navigation Order was broken in the video, and that’s my ‘expert opinion’ of course this is just an opinion until it’s tested in a court of law. The GDPR is what I’ve been led to believe from the information commissioners office

The CAA has already begun changing the rules due to 'auditors', and all of them are considered companies if earning from it. Therefore, subject to GDPR rules and regs, which they often say they aren't. DJ also collects the personal details of people to 'send them a keyring', this is in itself a GDPR issue and needs looking into further, and quickly too. Time is of the essence Mr Plod. The hate for auditors is growing daily and it wont be long before the public takes action against them, probably by a hacker putting CP on their pcs or whatever, try denying all that evidence right there on your pc DJ and that goes for the rest of the so called 'auditing' promoter crowd. It only a matter of time before our rights become even more eroded due to these idiots and the Govt are lapping it up. Not all auditors are idiots dont get me wrong, but those that are haven't thought about the long term effect of eroding our rights as citizens, something they hide behind is the 'I have the right' etc and yes currently they do, but for how long? And what right does a criminal have, esp when CP is found on their personal pcs and phones etc, things are bad enough as it is without them helping the Gov't to erode our way of life even further... all for cash and likes, hope its been worth it DJ and the like. Spending years in jail for CP and possibly tax fraud isnt my idea of a good way to earn a buck or two thats for sure. Lets not forget this 'auditing' originally began to take a closer look at how PUBLIC money was being spent, something I agree with, but when it turned into harassment and aggressive behaviour, all the usual stuff we see on social media to PRIVATE companies for likes and cash my support totally ended for them. Eroding the publics way of life wont go down well for any of them, not now, not ever, but they are blinded by fame and fortune so csnr see yhe long term implications of their abhorrent behaviour.

9 months on possibly the most popular drone pilot in the U.K. is still going strong . DJ knows his stuff , protects our rights, exposes ignorant company employees and bosses and you’re mostly talking absolute drivel!

@meichong8278

5 ай бұрын

And livestreams whilst driving over/through children ..... then strikes channels that show the footage all whilst demanding accountability and transparency...... of others !!!

recently, in his videos he's acted like a Tw*t and its not hard to find his real name is you want it, when flying his drone there is no way he can see a 49g drone at that height and distance he's doing it. the only reason he does videos is for that reaction, if they didn't react he would not make money and would not post it love you videos but 1st time commenting keep up the good work N Roy

The main issue I have found is between 'filming' and 'publishing'. We all know it is perfectly legal to film anyone and anything in a public place with very few exceptions. However, publishing images of people without their informed consent can have problems. For example: Auditor films security guard who is on private land and has come up to him to ask why he is filming. The auditor then says "I am filming for personal use". This gives the security guard the option to then walk away. If he doesn't walk away then he has indirectly given the auditor informed consent to film him, even though the guard is on private land. If, however, the auditor then goes on to publish that film on a platform like KZread then this is not covered as 'personal use' and the guard is then able to not only have the film taken down by the rules of KZread itself, but also under UK law... both under a breach of privacy ruling. Obviously, if the auditor tells the guard that he is filming for his KZread channel then the guard again has the option of staying or walking away. If he doesn't then he has again given informed consent to not only film but to be published on KZread. So, you see, it is not the filming of people that is the burr under the saddle for auditors, it is the privacy rules and gaining informed consent.

@Renegade1127

Жыл бұрын

Informed consent can never possibly work. It would mean TV companies having to get consent from thousands of people every time they do a football/rugby match etc.

@SensibleCentrist

7 ай бұрын

KZread isn’t a publisher, its a platform

@TukikoTroy

7 ай бұрын

@@SensibleCentrist Yes, but the poster is 'publishing' on that platform.

@kensukadventures628

Ай бұрын

It works as the ticket terms and conditions will include a warning that you may be photographed/videod whilst attending, and give contact details should you prefer not to be published. @@Renegade1127

Never heard so much crap, it’s perfectly legal to do what DJ does and people have no right to privacy in public, all these companies that he’s apparently “upset” and have big legal budgets haven’t taken action because they don’t have a leg to stand on

@Hangmanaudits

Жыл бұрын

Yes it is legal

@AlphaSAS

Жыл бұрын

Can I have your address then please so I can stand outside filming it??

@TMA_Droning

Жыл бұрын

@@AlphaSAS residential properties have different rules to commercial properties

@AlphaSAS

Жыл бұрын

@@TMA_Droning Doesn't matter. If I am standing in a public place I can film what I like.

@TMA_Droning

Жыл бұрын

@@AlphaSAS that’s true but as it’s a residential property then there’s an expectation of privacy unlike a commercial property

The mentioning about about DJ being "unmasked" and, essentially, making people google it just seems like you want to draw attention to his person. Almost as if you have a bias against him. If you don't want to make anyone's "life a hell", as you mentioned in the video, you could just have refrained from mentioning the whole thing entirely. If DJ has broken laws, I'm sure the UK legal system will deal with it. You asked for comments. The short answer to your video title is no.

@robinhill953

Жыл бұрын

Ere! That paperwork DJ sold me was dodgy! He needs his collar felt.😮

@CWK090

3 күн бұрын

Drawing attention to the private life of DJ who makes KZread dollars drawing attention to the private lives of others seems like just deserts to me.

Its not gdrp its GDPR , 😂 and DJ audits has to land the drone where its sets off ,its has GPS on it and if the battery is low it lands itself , the guy was clearly standing in the spot where the Drone had taken off , and if you actually know anything about Drones , which you clearly do not , you would know that DJ actually caught the drone and most likely cut his own hand in the process to stop, the tyrant who was standing in the Drones landing position , him from getting injured 👍

I agree that he should not be endangering the public, but what was the guard doing crossing the site boundary to confront the operator, was he trying to exert his unauthorised authority on a member of the pubic, or is this a grey area. I totally agree that he has a duty of care when flying, and should be aware of his surroundings. poor dog. I also agree that that he provokes a confrontation, albeit in a clever chose of words. As to being a business, another grey area, reason is that there are loads of people that do this, does he declare it as a business income, and pays national insurance etc...Watch this space

@Firefly_UAV

5 ай бұрын

Confrontations like the one with the guard are incredibly easy to avoid, land somewhere else!

The stupid thing here is that this auditing isn't done to prove anything or record anything interesting or of note, it's done to get a reaction and to make money on line. I've been photographing industrial sites all over the UK recording British Industry for 40 years not to make money or cause sh@t but to make a social record of the changing UK industrial landscapes. Now many of my friends have started using drones etc, but here's the thing, why would anyone want to film or photograph an innocuous uninteresting dull modern business premise on a typically boring and dull industrial estate unless of course just to cause an issue... genuinely interested folk such as myself know there is nowt to film of any real interest there so wouldn't waste the camera battery let alone a drone flight, now some ginormous chemical plant, opencast mine, quarry, steelworks etc etc its a different matter. I've had run ins a plenty with misinformed security people over the years who wrongly think they can tell me what I can and can't do in public with a camera, and I will argue until the cows come home as I believe our right to photograph has never been more threatened, these situations usually sort themselves out by remaining calm and explaining, mostly they never develop as there's a stand off, and in 40 years I guess I've had police interaction probably 10 times which has always gone the same way... nothing to talk about here!!! The problem with all these so called 'interested auditors' that actually don't give a flying doodah for the subject is that they'll screw it up for everyone as it will force a law change over drone flying or street photography, they won't care as they'll move onto the next attention seeking project leaving those of us with a genuine interest screwed over by the position they created to get extra 'likes'. If someone is genuinely interested in flying over a company with a drone/photographing stuff they should just do it as not illegal in public (as long as its non restricted air space or a restricted area in law), don't go out the way to cause anxt by trying to be clever and creating a situation by inviting trouble before you start by walking up and announcing yourself, if you get challenged during or after just give your point of view and walk away, trying to give people a lecture who don't understand the law on drones or photography achieves nothing especially if you just spent 40 mins being clever. Better to seek forgiveness than approval!!! Just as an aside I've also been approached many a time and been asked what I was doing resulting in a very friendly invite to come in and see the factory, or to be able to go back with friends for an official tour.... its called being pleasant and genuinely interested.

@Firefly_UAV

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for your comment. I love your approach and what you’ve said 👍

@iancastledine7284

Жыл бұрын

@@Firefly_UAV The fact that me and my similar minded friends have had a minimal amount of flack over 40 years shows exactly what auditors are about... recently at a powerstation we were told no photography having already got our shots by the fence, we very politely and in a friendly manner ,corrected the guy as best we could, he was still concerned and said he wasn't happy about it but we walked away saying, honest pal its all perfectly legit, check it out online and hope you have a great rest of the day (keeping it light and friendly). I've even shook their hands and said we'll have to agree to disagree, but were off now!!! Even if we've been caught setting up its not so hard just to smile and say there's nothing to worry about we are just doing a little photography.. personal and friendly interaction has got me a long looooong way down the years.

@iancastledine7284

11 ай бұрын

Yup I've had the same experiences, I went to do an old bridge which meant going through a factory on a public footpath at night, security less than happy but after a few mins of telling them about the night shot i was trying to achieve they actually took me off the path and gave me a better angle.. I showed em the pic and said gimme an email and I'll send you a copy.... we also had a great chat about the works.... I ended up mailing the pic and got an invite from their factory for a visit... result. I've had run ins with security threatening police at powerstations too, again I'll politely argue and walk away but because its deescalated I've never had anyone trying to lay hands on me... I just don't see a need to ever ask permission if I'm sure its within the law, if they choose to argue then thats all it is an argument... not a fight, not a police issue just a disagreement...

@unko2774

Ай бұрын

@@iancastledine7284 the ONLY difference between you and the auditors you speak of is you run away like a coward when confronted crying "but its legit boohoo" over your shoulder as you tuck tail MWAHAHA and these other auditors have the bravery to stand in their claim that it is legit.

I see a green eyed monster in the room 😂😂😂😂😂😂

@MUFCZONE

Жыл бұрын

ahhh yes, everyones jealous of the oxygen thieves. if only we could all thieve oxygen

@hessness

Жыл бұрын

Ah you're one of these people who think anyone who criticises someone they're "jealous". Sir you are immature!

@TheHarrybo1

11 ай бұрын

​@@MUFCZONEleast hes not a sheep like you eh , Also probably not a Man utd fan that lives 200 miles from the ground 😂😂 what a whopper

The guy flying on the footpath was a total prat and negligent IMO but i have to disagree as DJ appears highly popular and most people love his videos. He does not associate himself as a drone flyer first and foremost as primarily he is an auditor. Anyone can be an auditor and some are popular and some are not. I've not really got anything against him. There are way too many laws and red tape in the UK as it is without you worrying about a light weight drone.

@charlesdarwen3683

Жыл бұрын

Most people dont love his videos!

please explain why these 'auditors' are never charged with public misconduct. all they do is harass people and stick cameras in their faces and make rude insults about their appearances. if ordinary members of the public are going around town annoying everyone they would get charged and fined.

It's only a matter of time before there's a big incident and someone actually gets really hurt. It could be a drone losing power and dropping onto the head of a forklift driver, it could be an all out brawl between a group of auditors and employees on a site, it could be a drone pilot physically getting seriously injured while on private property and an ensuing legal battle. But one way or the other, something will go very wrong and it'll finally attract the attention of legislators. And we can only hope the legislation is tightened up significantly to protect the rights of business owners, and not just these public nuisances on the streets. The current laws are ludicrous. And anyone who tries to be 'chummy' with these guys, just because of social media, is a fool. They need to be rebuked and shut down at every opportunity. They're clearly just making money off views by going around upsetting people, disrupting businesses, and eliciting confrontations, under the guise of "educating people about drone and public photography laws". And on top of that they behave as if they're untouchable. They're self-entitled, rude, arrogant, condescending, public nuisances. They absolutely give the drone flying community a bad name.

@Hangmanaudits

Жыл бұрын

Don't be daft lad so u want all the CCTV removed in every city centre

@Hangmanaudits

Жыл бұрын

I think we should the auditors and people against it should pick two heads and they box it out 😂😂

Absolutely agree with what you say. I have just recently posted a negative comment on one of his recent audits, I just think what he does is inflammatory and pointless.

Did you used to be a copper ?

This security guard clearly placed himself into that position without any legal authority in order to stop this particular drone pilot from completing his task, any clear minded person with a modicum of common sense would have given the drone pilot space. You raise some very valid points but this first one is totally incorrect, the security man is at fault.

No negligence at all, slap head put himself in that position.