God that intro creeps me out and I love it!!

@RedEffectChannel

6 жыл бұрын

Thanks! :))))

@rickmoreno6858

5 жыл бұрын

@matsimus and @RedEffect are you guys going to team up and work together on a couple of videos? Like other tuber do?

@andrewlee-do3rf

5 жыл бұрын

calm down Matt...he's just only vaping. lol XD ;D;D;D;D;D

@karlhans6678

5 жыл бұрын

your intro also gives chills, Matsimus.

@lukatomas9465

5 жыл бұрын

@I AM GOING TO NUKE you T-95 and Black Eagle are two different tanks.

''tanks for watching''

Your channel is amazing, no biased, quick comments, factual, 10/10 would chill with you if i had the chance.

@lilMungo

Жыл бұрын

That aged well

Looks like we’re about to find out.

So much depends on how ready everyone is , how well trained , who has the best ground and intelligence , who fires first and who is the luckiest. The fog of war is a killer.

@andrewnorrie2731

5 жыл бұрын

For all the bluff 'n bluster, no-one's really going to risk a potentially nuclear war over Ukraine. The USSR reached that conclusion about China when China went into Vietnam in '79.

@randompheidoleminor3011

2 жыл бұрын

@@andrewnorrie2731 this aged well

@brunomenis1165

4 ай бұрын

lol@@andrewnorrie2731

Great video as always. But I ask you to add subtitles everytime you spell a large number. It isn't because of your accent but they will be easier to remember graphically. At least for me

Big plus about the T-84 are the blow out panels, to increase crew survivability

@alexusmc2384

2 жыл бұрын

And where did you get the information?

@longyu9336

Жыл бұрын

@@alexusmc2384 Only the Yatagan had them

@SirHellNaja

Жыл бұрын

@@longyu9336 The Oplots also have these

@Insert-Retarded-Reply-Here

Жыл бұрын

@@SirHellNaja however, the majority of its ammunition is still stored in the autoloader

You're forgetting that by comparing tank vs tank, is one thing, but tanks NEVER operate alone! They ALWAYS have infantry and other support with them as a combined arms team.

@smesh4190

Жыл бұрын

Russia entered the chat

@guynamedneko331

Жыл бұрын

aged like milk

@BtappinHD

Жыл бұрын

Although that is true in an non-applicable way to this video, this is a tank vs tank comparison, not a combined arms comparison

@borkwoof696

Жыл бұрын

Do they, though?

Cool videos keep it up!!!

Probably the engagement will go like this t90 fires t84 stops it, t84 fires t90 stops it, t90 fires t84 stops it, t84 fires t90 stops it, Red just a question correct me if I'm wrong, will a shot from a he frag round disable the fire control system? I mean if you damage the sights of the enemy tank you basically took the enemy out of the fight.

@deptusmechanikus7362

2 жыл бұрын

Until other T-90s go around the entire two Oplots currently present in Ucrane

@Andrew_Sword

2 жыл бұрын

@@deptusmechanikus7362 they go around the oplots only to be taken out by a javelin

@trollmanman5576

Жыл бұрын

@@Andrew_Sword Nobody mentioned infantry or ATGM in this scenario

@Andrew_Sword

Жыл бұрын

@@trollmanman5576 why would Ukrainians not have infantry?

Great one. Well researched. The scary part about this is it isn't like comparing A Leopard II to a LeClerec or something. It's a Duel that could very realistically happen. Lets hope it doesn't

@LynxErgo

2 жыл бұрын

Too bad

@Andrew_Sword

2 жыл бұрын

turns out the oplot is better because its operators are better

@lolmeme69_

Жыл бұрын

I guess it is happening...

Also some of Russian T-90 use thales thermal imaging system.

Red Effect- Dude, your knowledge amazes me! You should create an English website on Soviet tank information. We don't get that stuff here in the West- very few of us read Russian.

@mb_tesla

6 жыл бұрын

usa pokerpro There is tankograd blog that is in english and about soviet and russian tanks. Also there are some articles in english on btvt website. ;)

@mrphucyoo8281

5 жыл бұрын

Fully agree ,Tankograd is pretty much all you need, its first stop reference for scale modeling etc.

T14 armata is only paper facts I've not even seen it fire on the move yet but it's good at spinning its turret

@dmitrit.4862

4 жыл бұрын

Because Russia keeps a lot about the T-14 secret. You'll see all those things soon enough.

@highlandninja9522

4 жыл бұрын

Dmitri T. Come on man lol they tell us about all the new secret gizmos it has and how fast it can rotate the turret but a standard thing such as firing on the move and hitting targets is top secret lol I'm thinking they are having problems with the basics so if they are having problems firing on the move a thing any tank is expected to do easily then I wonder what kind of other shit they are hiding in fact I'm sure they will fix the problem soon but they will just hide a few guys in the turret

@dmitrit.4862

4 жыл бұрын

@@highlandninja9522 "in fact I'm sure they will fix the problem soon but they will just hide a few guys in the turret" - I hope this is a joke. Because if you take a close look at the T-14's turret (without it's covers, obviously), you'll realize that there's no space for one single person. I gotta say that there aren't many videos showing the T-14's performance. They gave us a short video about it's mobility and another one that shows the T-14's gun test and that's it. Russia prefers to keep many things hidden from the cameras. How much do you know about the T-95 or Object 195? There were so many speculations about that prototype tank but almost zero pictures even though that tank's development started in 1995! First pictures came up more than 10 years later and we still have no good pictures of it and certainly no intel about it's performancy during trials. We didn't know anything about the T-14 (Object 148) until Russia revealed that there will be a next-generation tank. We even didn't know anything about the T-15 which first came up with a 30mm gun and now received a 57mm auto-cannon. My father always told me that even during the Soviet-Era no one (except the government and a couple plants) knew what they were developing and building. We never heard anything about tanks like the Object 187, Object 477 (which is by the way one of the first prototypes with an unmanned turret!) or the now-famous Object 279. And there are plenty more of those "Objects". Russia is still not transparent when it comes to new weapons and they only show them when they think they're ready for a first sneak preview. Just wait for it. They'll show something new soon or later.

@highlandninja9522

4 жыл бұрын

Dmitri T. Yeah you are possibly correct mate but it's all the people going about saying it's the number 1 tank and it's this and it's that but we haven't even seen it hit a target on the move yet and if Russia can show launches of its newest ballistic missiles then a tank shooting on the move is nothing maybe seeing its defensive systems yes but not the basic firing on the move what could be so secretive that they are afraid of? It either has a laser gun turret or it's crap at it that's the only two reason I can think of mate

@dmitrit.4862

4 жыл бұрын

@@highlandninja9522 I don't believe what people say. I prefer facts, not some opinions you know? I heard so many dimwits claiming that Leopard-2 tanks are the best in the world, then Turkey lost several of them in one fucking battle in Al-Bab, Syria. Those dimwits finally shut their mouths after that incident, that's for sure. The thing about those missile launches is that it's nothing new. Everyone knows that Russia has ballistic missiles since soviet times, so if they launch a new one, it's like "meh...they've another one, nothing new!". Except last year, that was a game changer because usually a ballistic missile has a range of circa 11,000 km. Russia showed their latest missile which has a range of 16,000km and a few other new weapons like the Kinzhal hypersonic missile, the Status-6 / Poseidon unmanned-nuclear-underwater-drone (it can carry a 50 MT warhead, no shit!) and some other new weapons. But that's all part of this geopolitical game the "big" countries are playing. But you can't flex your muscles with a new tank, at least not on the global level. I'd say it's typical russian behavior. They show you a few things but not everything until they're 100% sure that you're allowed to see it. It's that simple. I doubt that there's an issue with the gun or the auto-loader because both parts were tested several times, the auto-loaders are in service since decades. The only thing I could think of is the conncetion between the crew and the turret. But that's nothing difficult, especially not for Russia which is pretty good in all kinds of electronic shit lately.

Very good video

This good!

The best tank is the one with the best crew

@tomsoki5738

3 жыл бұрын

So a Bob Semple with a good crew could beat a bad crew in a Challenger 2? Lol

@overwatchelite4083

3 жыл бұрын

@@tomsoki5738 Pffft, the bob semple is the bestest tank ever, put a bad crew on it and they'll easily defeat the chally with one hit to the frontal armor

@jaroslavdudas7227

3 жыл бұрын

True And situation do a lot on battlefield

That ending music sounds familiar.. did you get it from Newgrounds?

Outro music ?

What about the T72B3M?

@artemiy9403

6 жыл бұрын

6:29

@zhuravl-m2285

5 жыл бұрын

@Artemiy T-72B3M is a major upgrade to T-72B3. Improved ammunition, FCS, armor, engine, etc. It uses Relikt 3rd generation ERA which the T-90M also uses.

@vatanak8146

5 жыл бұрын

-OL- the 3M doesn't have relikt

@zhuravl-m2285

5 жыл бұрын

@Jao Jao do you have a credible source? Russian is fine, but I will need it translated. Several Western sources claim the T-72B3M is indeed mounted with Relikt. 1. www.army-technology.com/projects/t-72b3m-main-battle-tank/ 2. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-72_operators_and_variants 3. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kontakt-5 The wiki page on Kontakt-5 links to Russian source, which apparently also claims it has Relikt. It would make sense for the newest T-72s to have the most modernized upgrades. I believe only the Russian army has the B3M variant, and maybe some of Russia's closest allies. The B3M is not used by PMCs, rebels, or other nations' armies that aren't on very friendly terms with Russia.

@balta1769

4 жыл бұрын

Well technically both of you are right T-72B3M does have relikt but it’s only it’s side skirts that has relikt but the front only has kontakt-5

The time has come to test this out

Tanks for watching everybody....

These tanks look really good but I can’t get over how small they are

@deptusmechanikus7362

2 жыл бұрын

soviet tonks aren't smol, it's decadent western tonk who is fat and to big

@kaladore1982

2 жыл бұрын

@@deptusmechanikus7362 I wasn’t saying it was wrong, and I do think American tanks are to big too

@M16_Akula-III

2 жыл бұрын

@@kaladore1982 I think that's a joke....

@User-dc6sm

2 жыл бұрын

soviet tanks are either smaller or way bigger than wester tanks also in old warehouses there are smetimes old soviet 100 ton monsters or I think there must still be some Projekt 25 tank out there wich can withstand nuclear blast

@HoseTheBeast

2 жыл бұрын

And why isbthat a bad thing😂

No domestic APFSDS round is a significant disadvantage imo. If I remember correctly, the US is supplying or will be supplying Ukrainian forces with Javelin missiles which would pose a serious threat to armor in the region considering that they usually only operate alone or in a pair from what I've seen. Not sure if active protection would defeat it, but someone in the comments will probably know. The situation in Ukraine continues to be clusterfuck with or without armor. I haven't taken a hard side on the conflict(frankly due to confusion/so many different actors), but I do see how the West clearly assisted in the overthrow of Yanukovych.

@sdrkrm

6 жыл бұрын

Afganit APS does not protect T14 from up above - there are no hard kill modules facing the sky, just flare grenades and smoke screens.

@jesusf.2600

6 жыл бұрын

Sturm The Regulator 210 Javelin misiles an i think 30 Lauchers.

@Niko-xt5bs

2 жыл бұрын

@@jesusf.2600 *37 launchers

@borkwoof696

Жыл бұрын

This aged…interestingly

Oplot's biggest problem are it's target and fire control systems are not fully digital. Some systems are down to the core analogue and mechanical. Also the turret weight is off balance because of the Duplet ERA in front, so the gun stabilization is not perfect either.

@gregorylouis617

6 жыл бұрын

You actually special you know the T-55 Enigma had the same issue you know what they did they welded counter-weights to the back of the turret.

@sdrkrm

6 жыл бұрын

You're delusional. It's not computerized as it's NOT FULLY DIGITAL and it's far from sophisticated. T90M's Kalina FCS is much better. I don't have to provide the source since I was on the plant myself LOL!

@sdrkrm

6 жыл бұрын

Great. All modern NATO and Alies MBT's have DITITAL FCS. Even modernized Polish T72 will have digital FCSs. All modern Chinese MBTs have digital FCSs, Russian T90M, T72B3, T14 all have digital FCS. And yes in a modern world computer FC systems ARE DIGITIZED. I suppose you can suggest installing ancient Greek calculation machine to do the job - hell what an awesome idea! You don't even get the fact that all that analogue shit Oplot has inside weighs A FUCKING TON and takes a lot of room. Its panoramic sight is like a fucking Sauron's tower! Have you ever been inside Oplot-M/T? I don't thunk so. Grab your stupid Internet article rubbish you've found somewhere and stick them up your ass, you internet wiseguy.

@sdrkrm

6 жыл бұрын

Just to finally shut the pie-holes of wise internet kids - this is HOW the analogue FCS and stab REALLY works on T84 and Oplot-M as well kzread.info/dash/bejne/dZ51yql7hrzZk8Y.html

@sdrkrm

6 жыл бұрын

LOL, cretin HAVE YOU WATCHED THE VID? The gunner says - IT"S IMPOSSIBLE TO FIRE ACCURATELY! The whole team failed at Strong Europe Challenge because of this failed attempt to at T84 and Oplot M to combine BOTH digital and analogue systems into one.

civil war??? hmmmm

@Ypog_UA

4 жыл бұрын

i live in ukraine its not a civil war thats propaganda its a russian invasion

This tank technically has better specifications than moderate russian tank. But the latest field test by royal thailand army show different result. The kba3 cannon technically same cannon as 2A46M on russian tank, has worst accuracy compared to russian 2A46M The autoloader system is slightly different from russian autoloader yet faster reload but lack of reliability. Also many more disadvantages than russian tank that simpler yet reliable.

@yusuffirdaus3900

6 жыл бұрын

Alex T www.aseanmildef.com/2016/05/oplot-tank-of-thailand-are-having.html?m=1

@sdrkrm

6 жыл бұрын

Each soviet autoloader system is not very reliable since you need only a 20-60mm side dent or deformation to stall it. A back turret system such as the Yatagan has is much more reliable and MUCH safer for the crew.

@yusuffirdaus3900

6 жыл бұрын

Yaroslav-Z which was not reliable? Russian carousel autoloader or Ukrainian carousel autoloader? Its different russian autoloader sort all horizontal rounds and propelant. While ukrainian one sort propelant horizontally and rounds vertically

@sdrkrm

6 жыл бұрын

it doesn't matter. The modified T90SM/MS loader is even less reliable as it was widened to fit in the 646mm Svinets rounds. A 10-20 mm structural deformation to the 50mm thin board will make it stall. Horizontal placement does not save the ordinance from being hit by splinter front formed by a successful penetration + the way the extra shells are placed within the side lots doesn't help either.

@TonymanCS

6 жыл бұрын

Yury Nikolayev What kind of nonsense are you touting? Your sources stated the problem was with "BATTERIES" damn liar. image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2015/31/1438256012-t-84-120-yatagan.jpg You forgot Oplot have entirely different autoloader, not the *"Carousel of Death"* anymore. It's ammo storage is now located in the turret rear. Secondary ammo storage is small and don't even have to be there (just like Leopard 2 series). Furthermore it can even be armed with dreaded 120mm Western gun that can fire all types of NATO ammunition. It amaze me how Russian still fail to separate ammo from the rest of the tank. Even Armata (crew separated but internal compartment not)

Isn't ukraine operating t-64's mostly?

@elusive6119

6 жыл бұрын

They work, but as practice has shown, the T-72B3 in a minimum upgrade to surpass both the T-64 and their modern modernization. The collision with the T-72B equipped with thermal imagers of 80 x ended in total defeat for the T-64.

@nks406

6 жыл бұрын

Джо //Elusive// Yeah, still an interesting concept. In the end though practical vehicles tend to replace sophisticated ones.

@sdrkrm

6 жыл бұрын

Джо //Elusive// - BS. T72B3 is still T72. Direct, though rare confrontations during Ukraine-Russia war showed a fair advantage of T64BM Bulat over even T72B3 not no mention T72Bs etc.

@elusive6119

6 жыл бұрын

Well of course shown) "Bulat" is significantly better than just T-64, and it is even effective against the T-72 and T-72B, but it is equivalent to the T-72B3. And after the losses incurred, they are withdrawn from the conflict zone, because just lose effective technology in the conflict zone is wasteful. The T-72B3 completely fulfilled the task, a dozen tanks reduced the advantage in the number of old T-64s against the T-72 to the zero account, the Nazis attack on the Russian-speaking regions stopped. And for the T-90, even "Bulat" and the old T-64, mostly just food because of the imperfection of their sights and old ammunition.

@sdrkrm

6 жыл бұрын

LOL the most recent APFSDS used on Donbass is Mango. Tanks did almost nothing to reduce the advantage of either sides, artillery did as 80% fo all MBTs were lost due shelling.

Outro music is chaoz fantasy.

video about pt91 twardy please!

Did its just me or the video not say that every russian tank above t64 have composite armor

In 4 years things changed a lot

Russian tanks are some of my favorites but the derivatives made by other nations are just on a whole new level. I absolutely love the Oplot and M-95 degman. Welded turret beauties.

Tank you for watching. I see what you did there

T-14 vs OPLOT, T-14 walks away with shot up turret and the OPLOT is left with no turret.

@Vegas-if8ju

6 жыл бұрын

NemoM22 Locust just like 2hen a western tanks shoot russian tanks

@TonymanCS

6 жыл бұрын

Too bad Oplot has different ammo storage-Western turret style. Not a carousel. Don't expect its turret to fly as often as Ruskies. image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2015/31/1438256012-t-84-120-yatagan.jpg So it gonna end by Oplot damaged but the same to Armata with its paper turret.

@nemom225

5 жыл бұрын

I'm pretty sure that a T14 can find the ammo with its shells before the OPLOT can destroy all the systems in the turret of the T14.

@nemom225

5 жыл бұрын

One shot to the OPLOT and its ammo goes up and even if the OPLOT gets the first shot there are very few of them and Russian tanks usaly travel in numbers so....

@mwtrolle

5 жыл бұрын

NemoM22 Locust probably the T-14 would win almost every time on a flat plane and in a 1v1 battle. But if the T-14 are on the move and the Oplot are waiting it is more then capable of taking the T-14 out. Also it’s not really a fair comparison as the T-14 are brand new, and if the information coming from Russia can be trusted the best or at least one of the best tanks in the world. It would be more fair to compare it to the T72-B3 or the T-90 for that matter.

Это не российские, а советские танки и на их базе делают улучшения!

@sergeyalaev9393

5 жыл бұрын

Some ukrainians admit that?Wow, I thought everyone of you there would be shouting that "It is not the Soviet Union who built these tanks, but it was us who built them for the soviet union"

@sergeyalaev9393

5 жыл бұрын

@@sudziko and still russian tanks are more than about ~80 Oplot's and over900 T-64 modifications BM, BV,BVM.The Tiger 1 was big, well armed and well armored.And still, Shermans, 34s and Cromwells prevailed due to numbers.And in this case, 49 of the Oplot's are not even in Ukraine, but in Thailand.

4:40 turkish light armoured kpersonal carrier saved crew againt an atgm

If they can't shoot good sabots, what about developing simpler thermobetic, giant he, hesh, triplex shaped charge rounds?

How the hell does the driver in Oplot get out?

@dequariusbiquiner6102

3 жыл бұрын

Climbs out of the engine

@user-yn6rl1jd2e

3 жыл бұрын

ERA block swings up so he can exit

@Mandrak789

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-yn6rl1jd2e Ah, ok. Thanks.

Well, armata can just stop because of engine or transmission malfunction during battle

@cjdfnivdhfvvjngxdvk5929

Жыл бұрын

And oplot can stop because of engine or transmission malfunction too. Ex Soviet countries tanks are literally the same as Russian tanks.

@rajaydon1893

Жыл бұрын

I've never seen one have a malfunction like that but I have seen a poorly trained tanker lock the brakes and don't know how to unlock it

@GlyphidGuard

Жыл бұрын

@@rajaydon1893 During parade where these tanks were shown. There it was shown

Given on again off again rumours of EU assistance with Opolot; a large amount of time would be needed to asses if improvements are coming to Ukrainian models. Supposedly Germany is supposed to be assisting with ammunition, though I haven't seen any official statement at all. The lack of NATO and US interest (the USA is much more focused on poland) makes me doubt the rumours. Especially as Germany is in a refit process for the rapid reaction force and it's own defence needs. However it remains possible that Opolot could become much more competitive yet.

@russischer4755

5 жыл бұрын

I doubt we Germans are involved AT ALL. We are busy with the development of our own projects. There's the leopard3, FCAS air superiority plane, MEADS air defence system, and a new artillery system to succeed the PZH2000. That's a whole lot of money to spent. I doubt we can afford to get involved anywhere until we're done with most these projects. Ressources are bound to at least 2035 I'd say^^

Boy the KZread Algorithm creeps me out. These tanks must be in action as we speak.

@Lecheno878

Жыл бұрын

Nope Ukraine only has 6 so it can’t use them

most of heavy industry search+workshop of USSR place in Ukraina , from 1991 till now ,those relic of USSR , Ukrainian sell them to US , CN one after other do they have anything else to sell ?

@ravenouself4181

3 жыл бұрын

At least they didn't leave them to rot and then wonder why the economy is shit... wait...

BM-Oplot should be compared with T90M because of it's availability...

Love the name Oplot. Can i call it "Plutot"? Please.....

@thureintun1687

4 жыл бұрын

Or maybe plutplut? Please I'm begging you all

@Ypog_UA

4 жыл бұрын

@@thureintun1687 its not russian so no putin

@thureintun1687

4 жыл бұрын

@@Ypog_UA WHY?????

150 are right now made in ukraine. Delays because of bad weather conditions though

Spjonsjord by Pjutin

I feel sorry for the Ukraine. Great country with great hardworking and beautiful people. But so many wrong decisions...

@mwtrolle

5 жыл бұрын

DesignBam the same could be said for Russians except they also have a dictator that only thinks of his self and how he can keep power.

@mwtrolle

5 жыл бұрын

@Dex4Sure Putin are acting in a way to close to Hitler, if a man like him got power in Germany you would see a civil war right away.

@mwtrolle

5 жыл бұрын

Dex4Sure I think it would be more fair to say, that that’s what happen when you country have been run by an extremist dictator.

@2010cam1

5 жыл бұрын

@@mwtrolle You can talk about immigration all you want, I would much rather live anywhere in Europe than the 3rd world mafia state that is Putin's Russia - The Russian people deserve better than Putin and his manipulative gang of crooked politicians making decisions for them.

@gegegec

5 жыл бұрын

Ukraines political and deplomatical situation is so bad. Nato is just eating popcorn and Russia wants to eat Ukraine

In reverse!🥊

German and French armored vehicle companies should just buy up Ukraine's tank production capabilities along with its know how and then reintroduce German style manufacturing into this Ukrainian factories. Ukrainian factories could then spit out hundreds and even thousands of these if they liked^^

there were 10 in 2010 now there are a lot more

Ukraine should switch to 120mm main gun ala Yatagan

@RedEffectChannel

6 жыл бұрын

Agree, that tank is amazing, on top of that they can use any NATO ammo some of which can defeat most modern Russian tanks, current firepower of Ukrainian tanks is lacking penetrating power to face Russian tanks.

@jeffkardosjr.3825

5 жыл бұрын

@@RedEffectChannel Then they would lose the ability to use captured Russian ammo.

@user-dp4ok9ox5w

2 жыл бұрын

@@jeffkardosjr.3825 Ukraine is yet to capture a single piece of "Russian ammo".

Has Russia completed the national focus to annex Ukraine?

@alexflim

5 жыл бұрын

Nah we have decided, she kinda dosnt deserve honour to be annexed.

@1986tessie

5 жыл бұрын

Modern day hoi4 would be boring af.

@ravenouself4181

3 жыл бұрын

Nah, Russia went down the "let's bully Ukraine a bit" focus tree

Instead of trying to build tanks, maybe Ukraine should be trying to build factories for an upcoming war...

@scudb5509

5 жыл бұрын

Warme Worst In your dreams. Once Russia actually invades Ukraine, Ukraine will be fucked.

@aidan8117

5 жыл бұрын

@@Natogoon Dumbass lol

@victusmortem

5 жыл бұрын

between 2014-2019 opened around 170 new factorys

@ylu6685

5 жыл бұрын

@@scudb5509 Chechnia.Jpg 10 chechens with old ak have fucked half of their army.About what are u speaking? Russian army is strong only in dreams of idiots like u and propagandist videos.

@user-dr2wk2tz7x

2 жыл бұрын

​@@scudb5509 didn't age well

Man do I have some news for you

t84u oplot and bm oplot in service with ukrainian ground firces right?

@elusive6119

5 жыл бұрын

no, it doesn't work. shitty engine old ammunition problems with the production

@clovisdelins8490

4 жыл бұрын

@@elusive6119 you are Russian or Ukrainian?

@clovisdelins8490

4 жыл бұрын

@@elusive6119 you are Russian or Ukrainian?

@elusive6119

4 жыл бұрын

@@clovisdelins8490 The question is incorrect, Russia and Ukraine are one and the same, putting Russian and Ukrainian next to you, you will not see the difference, just like they themselves. The illegally drawn border after the Bialowieza conspiracy does not change anything, like the coup in 2014 with the dissolution of the Supreme Court. Ukraine does not currently have the technical ability to produce the T-80. Only mediocre "repair" of decommissioned tanks 30 years ago.

Error 1 Svinets 1 DU round has more than 830mm penetration at 2km

@Unbekannter2024

6 жыл бұрын

Mikhail Nukov wtf lol. 650 at least

@user-bi4wl2pn5n

6 жыл бұрын

Error 2 the T-90AM is not a new tank it is an upgrade of an existing tank And why the bloody hell is the BM oplot in this comparrison? Russia has more armatas than Ukraine has any variant of the oplot. This comparrison is pointless the only oplots in servce are propaganda tools or for export.

@Unbekannter2024

6 жыл бұрын

Mikhail Nukov Oplot is shit for one reason: 3BM-42. On other hand we see modernized T-72B (1989) and T-72BU(1991), which soon get renamed to T-90. If theres would be a war between Russia and Ukraine, tanks workhorses would be T-72B, T-64BV, T-80BV, T-80U/UM, and some T-90A

@user-bi4wl2pn5n

6 жыл бұрын

And Russian tanks can fire rounds with 830mm pentration at 2km.

@RedEffectChannel

6 жыл бұрын

The table I posted in the video is official from Tula, DU monoblock penetrators have twice the penetration on 0 degrees of the 60deg one, so 370x2 is 740mm, it's neither 650, neither 830

what if you compare t-90m vs oplot?

Did you forget the t14 t90ms t80bvm

Can the russian tanks use ukranian main gun ammunition or the other way around?

@RedEffectChannel

5 жыл бұрын

Ukrainians only have stock of Soviet ammunition, so the best ones are 3BM32 and 3BM42 which Russians also have in stock, so all Russian tanks can use Ukrainian projectiles. Russian latest tanks have modified guns and autoloaders so they can fire much longer and powerful projectiles. Ukrainian tanks, including BM Oplot, dont have new guns nor new autoloaders, so they can not fire those long projectiles, they are stuck with old Soviet ones. There has been development of longer and better projectiles in Ukraine, but none entered service, for now, Ukrainian tanks are lagging behind in firepower because of their inability to fire long projectiles.

@hanfpeter3742

5 жыл бұрын

@@RedEffectChannel ah, thank you for the answer.

thailand royal army i like BTR4

What about the OPLOT's ability to shoot long range anti-tank missiles? bit oversight imo

@tiagomorais5415

5 жыл бұрын

All of these have them

@lukabogdanovic4658

5 жыл бұрын

obsolete ant tank missiled

@_geck

4 жыл бұрын

they're from the 70's

@namesurname624

3 жыл бұрын

No modern targeting systems to use modern missiles either

@deptusmechanikus7362

2 жыл бұрын

@@tiagomorais5415 all two of them

Badly

God we need to teach you how to say "ERA" it really bothers me for some odd reason to keep hearing "eee reee ey" xD

What does Oplot translate to in English? Kinda funny in Armored Warfare the Oplot is a T9 or 10 Premium tank lol......so, it has one hell of a gun...

@xAlexTobiasxB

4 жыл бұрын

The gun isn't the problem, but the ammunition, since Ukraine uses old ammunition from the 1980's. Btw Oplot means "Stronghold" or "fortress" (it really is one of the strongest armored tank in the world, just with old ammunition)...

@Ypog_UA

4 жыл бұрын

the gun isnt that effective against modern upgraded mbt's, but pretty much anything else is fine. it can deal with older russian models like t-72 or t-80 and everything below that, which is what ukraine would be fighting for the next few decades. russia wouldnt send their best t-90 and t-14 just for them to be destroyed from the side in some ukrainian city by an rpg.

Anyone seen this Oplot? They might be only defending Kiev, se we don't see them in action.

@mbtenjoyer9487

Жыл бұрын

Probably not even used

In the end, airpower, numbers of armor will win the war.

@irtazaazam2573

5 жыл бұрын

What does that have to do with the Oplot?

@aap9167

4 жыл бұрын

Oye khareeb Tau nahin liya ???

Sounds like Russian front in 1944 - One Panther is no match for twelve T-34's.

That why Thailand bought it

Oplot can shoot Kombat missiles so it helps against Russian tanks. Apparently Kombat is better than Russian Reflex missile. Kombat should be able to penetrate all other tank's armor except Armata's

@MrTangolizard

5 жыл бұрын

Olli-Pekka Osmala but it’s a laser guided missile making it susceptible to laxer jamming

@Concerned_one

3 жыл бұрын

you mean like mortal Kombat??

@olli-pekkaosmala9295

3 жыл бұрын

@@Concerned_one Maybe designers of missile played it too much

@olli-pekkaosmala9295

3 жыл бұрын

@@MrTangolizard Guidance laser goes to tail of missile instead of target. So jamming it is difficult.

@MrTangolizard

3 жыл бұрын

Olli-Pekka Osmala yes and no it difficult but the west and Russia both have the capability

Okay, why have he said that Svinets (650mm of penetration at 2km) wouldn't be able to penetrate T-64BM with ''K-5 clone'' DUPLET? 3BM42 or Mango is said to penetrate 440mm of armor at 2km and around 490-500mm at point blank, yet it still penetrated the armor after going through DUPLET (it didn't perforate). Also remember that K-5 (or it's ''clone'' DUPLET should lower the penetration of APFSDS by 20-30%, and it still penetrated. DM43/53 or Svinets/Svinets-1 would go through the tank at maximum range. According to that, my own estimate T-64BM without DUPLET, 400-415mm RHa vs KE, with DUPLET 520-535mm RHa max. Nothing more. Still inferior to PT-91, Leopard 2A5, T-72B3, T-90A etc...

@elusive6119

5 жыл бұрын

K-5 is fundamentally different from the EPA "knife", from which made EPA"double". EPA K-5 works by massive plates and accurately calculated charge, works well. "Relic" is its evolution, with backward compatibility. "Knife" is a continuation of experimental developments, which were recognized in the USSR as a technological dead end. A large mass, many of the materials used, of dubious effectiveness, the reduction of the General characteristics of the tank, the increase in size, low survivability... Potentially, the "double" can stop the projectile .... sometimes. In addition, there is a possibility that the blocks will work all at once...

@eyyze

5 жыл бұрын

Oh, didn't know that. dziennikzbrojny.pl/media/WLad%20wyposazenie/N%C3%B3%C5%BC%2010.jpg dziennikzbrojny.pl/artykuly/art,5,23,8552,wojska-ladowe,wyposazenie,ukrainski-pancerz-reaktywny-noz-czesc-ii-noz-i-duplet Well, there's no english translations so you would need to translate it yourself. In the case of the new Ukrainian ERA Duplet, the charge has a different dimension, given that: Probably 90% of the power corresponding to the actual for duplicate systems. From the site. Nvm, by my own estimate, DUPLET is more or less equivalent to RELIKT, or even better if it works correctly. But still, i wouldn't give it better KE protection that RELIKT, because it's effectiveness (shown on the diagram) is only in 1/3 of the ERA. And most likely, any modern APFSDS, counting from DM43 , through DM53, to Svinets-1 will go through it's upper half just as good. (not counting Vaccum-1 since it's a kind of ''monster'') Going back to the topic, DUPLET should still be better than K-5, when put on T-84, T-64BM don't have good enough composite armor, (it only got added some HHS plates, nothing more). So yeah, my statement about 400-415 RHa without DUPLET, and around 550-600 with it still stands. For BM Oplot (modernized T-80), the best KE protection i would give it without DUPLET would be around 500-550 RHa, and around 650-750 RHa with it, about the same as T-90A. Analysis, please don't just start insulting like some people do. edit. he said T-72B3 is rated as 500-550 RHa of armor, that's simply a lie. It's composite armor is still the same as T-72B (460-520 RHa at the thickest part of the hull)

@elusive6119

5 жыл бұрын

Yes, everything is about the same as you said, excellent analysis! Potentially, "double" can be more effective than K-5, but ... I already mentioned the reasons why it will not be applicable to the T series. That is why its development was stopped. As well as from the active protection kit "rain" aka "screen" it does not work as well as desired. Weight, dimensions, random efficiency ... For the T-72B3, armored packages were replaced (and not only armor, communications, weapon control systems, etc.), taking into account the experience of using T-90 and T-80U, in addition, not only the original K-5, actual figures we will not know, at least not soon. The entire series of tanks T excluding the T-80 and to a lesser extent the modern T-90, has problems with the transmission and engine, the overweight of their Achilles' heel.

@eyyze

5 жыл бұрын

''armored packages were replaced'' - you mean, the composite armor plates when went through modernization got replaced by newer ones, but actuall composition didn't change or?

@elusive6119

5 жыл бұрын

From the T-72B remained only the hull, everything else is more late T-90, replaced or repaired. The armor was exactly replaced, the automatic loading mechanism, electronic systems, etc. were changed. In addition, this is not all that will be done, it is difficult to do such a volume of work at a time. The T-72B3 is already more modern than the original T-90 (not T-90A). Some tanks have already been upgraded to B3 + or B3M

You forgot that even the older oplot has neutral steering and a really good reverse speed

I just got this recommended by KZread with the escalation in Ukraine.

You know that Russia already has T-90M in service and T-14 in production

@mrbalz5404

2 жыл бұрын

The T-72B3 is currently one of the most advanced and most importantly COMMON Russian tanks, meaning the oplot is most likely to face this tank, the tank makes for a good benchmark basis

@user-lz1yb6qk3f

2 жыл бұрын

@@mrbalz5404. It's natural to use best tanks you have in real battle and keep others for reserves. So in any real engagement T-90Ms and T-14s would be the spearhead of russian ground forces.

@Morgan_Freeman_

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-lz1yb6qk3f T14s have been canceled and won’t be really be used and T90Ms are in very low quantity so they will most likely not be used in big quantities. So you’re wrong, their likely not to spearhead. As I said, likely l

@user-lz1yb6qk3f

2 жыл бұрын

@@Morgan_Freeman_ now i just don't see them on the footages from the war. But until the end we won't know what exactly was used with exact quantities.

@L96A1killerif

2 жыл бұрын

@@mrbalz5404 this comment has aged well

better then leo 2 4

@23GreyFox

5 жыл бұрын

And worse than Leo 2A6

@lukabogdanovic4658

5 жыл бұрын

better then 2a5

kornet or RPG 29 good answers to the Oplot

@xAlexTobiasxB

4 жыл бұрын

Did you even watch the fucking video? The Oplot has one of the best protection against missiles and RPGs. Even the side armor (which has 3 layers of ERA overlapping) can withstand the kornet missile. That's the biggest strength of this tank after all.

@JASHVEER22

4 жыл бұрын

@@xAlexTobiasxB if Abrams or merkava could not withstand rpg29 shot I highly doubt that oplot can do better

@xAlexTobiasxB

4 жыл бұрын

@@JASHVEER22 Oplot-M has much better armor protection than Abrams or Merkava. Just watch the part at 3:39

@gaiofattos2

4 жыл бұрын

@@JASHVEER22 Without extra thickness they cannot whistand, luckly the t-64 have the extra armor.

@user-md3sl1nn3m

3 жыл бұрын

@@xAlexTobiasxB how nany BM Oplot in Ukraine, answer about 5 tanks and so go to Moscow, good luck 😂😂😂😂

Quite well, as it turns out.

@slavicemperor8279

2 жыл бұрын

Not really. None of the Russian losses I have seen so far are from tank to tank combat, but from Stugna, Javelins, NLAWs etc. I have seen maybe 3-4 videos of tank to tank combat, mostly T72B3 vs T-64 and Russians have won every of those encounters.

@dogmeat4275

2 жыл бұрын

As of now, even Ukrainian tanks aren't doing too hot. Almost all Russian tank losses have been from anti tank teams and drones. And Ukrainian T64s have been having trouble with the same kind of opposition albeit with less tanks lost.

@the_burger

2 жыл бұрын

@@dogmeat4275 It is just propaganda. Our armymen have their phones taken away, so less non formal footage of destroyed enemy vehicles. Ukrops, on the other hand, do as they wish. They take footage of everything, even themselves hiding in schools and kindergartens, and then cry when they get bombed. As of right now, more than 2500 ukrainian tanks and other armored vehicles have been destroyed.

@dogmeat4275

2 жыл бұрын

@@the_burger Even the Russian military didn't report 2500 afvs destroyed lol

@igorvuk4454

Жыл бұрын

@@the_burger bahahah, tank brigade defending Kiev actually ravaged the russian tank force 5times it's numbers. and that was 9 months ago :D

7:23 Yeah, the T-14 will have severe engine failures before getting into the battlefield xD

@lukabogdanovic4658

5 жыл бұрын

the engine didnt fail lol

@antbonyziemiak208

Жыл бұрын

The Russians were showing off their T-14 in front of red Square parade...and it broke down!!!!

Why Ukraine never send their oplot m on the frontline? T64 is pretty outdated for such conflict

@PutlerXLO

6 жыл бұрын

For what? We have thousands of cheap t-64 tanks, and the front line is far from the capital or other important places, so there is no need to use newer and more expensive tanks to accomplish these tasks. This tank is too expensive for this usage. You can sell one of them and upgrade many old tanks with this money and it's more efficient at this moment.

Yay I'm the 2000th like

i thought russia uses the t-14 now

@Internetbutthurt

6 жыл бұрын

Its still technically in development. We should find out this year if its going to be mass produced. Production will start off small regardless.

@elusive6119

5 жыл бұрын

Russia uses T-72B3, T-80BVM, T-90A and their modifications. T-14 transferred to the military for testing, but are owned by the Corporation. The subsequent improved t-14 series with the changes has already been ordered. But given that all tanks more than 6000 thousand, less than 100 prototypes is relatively small.

@CaptainGrief66

5 жыл бұрын

@Vladimir Putin To be honest any country would have difficulties ramping up production for something as unusual and novel as the T-14, Russia also runs maintenance and uses more than just one MBT unlike the US or Germany as an example.

Nothing can be compared to T14 because it’s a fucking fantasy!!!

Now BM Oplot Still left in Ukrainia?

@Lecheno878

Жыл бұрын

None have been destroyed but 2 have been seen in combat

@sakisakiwakiwaki1636

Жыл бұрын

@@Lecheno878 Good!

@definitelyfrank9341

Жыл бұрын

​@@Lecheno878 You mean driving around?

@Lecheno878

Жыл бұрын

@@definitelyfrank9341 In actual combat

I'm still impressed that anyone could keep producing anything in a war zone especially tanks.

OK so every tank is going to war right now then if they keep adding on more and more armor to keep from being k I A it would be a sight to see to see who got the most strongest tanks they keep making the bullet for the armor on and on and on they go just like the rockets and missiles and ammo as well then they will go on to the troops armor troops lol like bullet proof troops so when they finally realized that they all ran out of money and other stuff who gonna do what and for what every body is broke where nothing to do but use all the weapons every country made to see who got more what after they use the big ones on each other there will be nothing to see but life after death I was told its not death just change of worlds

sadly not a single one has been seen so far destroying some orcs.

@imightbearacist6613

2 жыл бұрын

because theres only like 2 of em, the rest are sold to thailand for a quick buck, but Ukraine needed that money badly

@pvt.potato1943

2 жыл бұрын

@Dani AlSome Russian soldiers use sim cards from Ukranian phones meaning the Telephone company can just tell the Ukranian government where they are and launch artillery strikes at them. This is basic IT knowledge how the fuck did they not know!?

@Lecheno878

Жыл бұрын

1 was showed to be in the east but wasn’t destroyed

The only tank that has received massive amounts of punishment and survived and not lost crew members is challenger two but people always put it down in the rankings below tanks that have not seen action or because the paper facts about these tanks say they can do this or that but to me it's stupid to go by such things as I could make a cardboard tank and state that it's super cardboard and has this that dose that and that that does this and people lap it up and base their opinions on marketing gimmicks lol combat is the only thing that proves how good a tank is and I've seen destroyed m1abrahams destroyed leopards destroyed t72 destroyed t80 t64 destroyed merkavas but no destroyed c2 apart for a blue on blue were the round went through the open hatch but people put it below because the paper facts say the others should be better ?

Russia cannot afford to buy more than a handful of those T-14 Armatas and instead have to try to modernize old T-90s.

@puntoni

6 жыл бұрын

Michael Capek It's actually a smart move

@diablo2elitepvpguides405

5 жыл бұрын

it's one thing to have all your best technology thrown on to a tank, it's another thing to have it in factory production, especially when your waging many proxy wars and Ukraine even then their unproven, reason Russia doesn't use the turbine cuz the Russian army got embarrassed in rthe chechen war

@scudb5509

5 жыл бұрын

Those upgraded tanks are as good as the western tanks. Buying Armata is a waist of money. That’s a very smart move by Russia.

@mrphucyoo8281

5 жыл бұрын

3000 tanks,from t72 up to t90 is a good starting point though! How much fun to have them warming up on the border?

@sebastiancizmarov1273

5 жыл бұрын

@@diablo2elitepvpguides405 Russia doesn't use Turbine engines because it consumes way more fuel then conventional diesel and everyone already know how to maintain and operate diesels

There is 1 simple thing that makes this Ukrainian tank stand out from Russian's newest and strongest Armata *NO MORE CAROUSEL OF DEATH* Russian failed to do so. Instead of moving ammo away from the crew and internal compartment they move they crew away but still expose the rest of the tank to possible ammo cook off. No blow out panels means T-14's turret gonna fly out just as an old T-72 if being hit to carousel. No wonder Ukrainian were so essential to Russian tank development. Sucks to have them gone, huh?

@h0st_le960

5 жыл бұрын

Good point but a blowout panel doesn't make a tank invincible to ammo racks

@mrphucyoo8281

5 жыл бұрын

Thought they had now added protection to the carousel?

@lukabogdanovic4658

5 жыл бұрын

t14 has blow out pannels plus its armor against KE enwrgy is like 3000mm sooo

@georgethompson1460

Жыл бұрын

@@lukabogdanovic4658 Unfortunately Russia can't afford to make them.

But not the cia/mi5 involvement

I think you forgot the T-14 Armata

@yamato-ua

5 жыл бұрын

The engine of armata on Parade hadn't even started, what are you talking about

@justrandomman2415

5 жыл бұрын

Человеко- человек idiot it didn’t break down the E BRAKE WAS TURNED ON

@yamato-ua

5 жыл бұрын

@@justrandomman2415 on the parade everything must be perfect, those Russian dumbasses failed

@justrandomman2415

5 жыл бұрын

Человеко- человек you do realize the driver was new to the t14 and also blaming all of russia for a simple e brake mishap fucking Russophobe

@yamato-ua

5 жыл бұрын

Yes I hate those Russians for occupying and destroying my land and killing my nation. Russia can only attack the weaker ones, someone like Georgia, Ukraine or Chechnya

Sry but from where do you get these RHA estimations? There is no information about the thickness or the composition of the t-84 Oplot-M armor. The Oplot uses totally new composite arnor and has new ad-on armor so there is no comparison with for example the t-80U.

RedEffect - war in Ukraine is not a "civil war" but an international war because Russia is directly involved - this is a fight over the borders between Russia and Ukraine - get it right

@hicmad

5 жыл бұрын

I wouldn't even call it a war.

@taraskyz

5 жыл бұрын

@@hicmadTry crossing a front line there, then tell us it's not a war again.

creepy intro creepy algorithms

*liberate crimea not annex.

@kaloyandraganov9462

5 жыл бұрын

*invade

@lukabogdanovic4658

5 жыл бұрын

@@kaloyandraganov9462* libirate of the will of the ppl asdhole

Those Oplot tanks even worse than old t 64, find video when ukrainian tanksmen talk about Oplot on europe tank challange.

Oplot doesn't matter. Main tanks of Ukrainian army is T-64BV and T-80BV. They're still can resist T-72B

@RedEffectChannel

6 жыл бұрын

Ukraine operates zero T-80 tanks, while yes it does operate with T-64BV tanks the most because Kharkov was the main factory producing them during USSR and when USSR collapsed majority of T-64s, especially newest models, remained in Ukraine. While T-64BV is comperable to T-72B, it stands no chance against T-72B3, T-64BM is more comparable to T-72B3, but the number of them is nowhere near the number of T-72B3 tanks operated by Russia.

@Unbekannter2024

6 жыл бұрын

RedEffect Wrong. Ukraine operates hundreds of T-80B/BV/U

@RedEffectChannel

6 жыл бұрын

Only T-80 left in Ukraine was T-80UD, which was diesel variant of T-80U tank, exactly 350 of them were left in Ukraine after the collaps of USSR, but the problem is, Ukraine upgraded them with new welded turret and got renamed to T-84, which serves as a base for BM Oplot, so no T-80 tanks are operatable in Ukraine. Zero.

@Unbekannter2024

6 жыл бұрын

RedEffect Second Picture for 2011 evgenuss.livejournal.com/627273.html Don't read watch pictures

@RedEffectChannel

6 жыл бұрын

I am aware they have a storage of T-80 tanks, operating means in deployment, as far as I know no T-80 tank has been deployed by Ukraine to fight the separatists. And just by reading the text you told me not to read confirms what I said, they have not been deployed.

What has the available ammo to do with the tank? If they have the same gun, they should be able to fire the same rounds. It is like saying your kalashnikow is technologically inferior to my FAL, because you have only blanks.

UKRAINE STROOOOOOOONNNG

@bdog2802

4 жыл бұрын

Український Уpод the Ukraine is less stable then my kitchen table

@Ypog_UA

4 жыл бұрын

@@bdog2802 clearly you dont know anything about ukraine just by the fact you called it "the ukraine"

@bdog2802

4 жыл бұрын

Український Уpод historically its always been called The Ukraine

@Ypog_UA

4 жыл бұрын

@@bdog2802 no it hasn't it was just dumb english speakers like you getting it wrong. even if it was in the past, right now it's the present where that isn't correct.

@bdog2802

4 жыл бұрын

Український Уpод do you have any historical argument to back up your claim? Cus if not you are just talking nonsense at this point

russians rolling out a next generation MBT while NATO still sits on abrams, leopards, leclercs, and challengers...

@bulcsutoth1134

3 жыл бұрын

Leopard 2a7 is easily taking on the newest russian MBT s