Go to ground.news/militaryshow to stay fully informed. Subscribe through my link for 40% off unlimited access this month.

@aj9969

Ай бұрын

And why should USA retaliate against Russia for nuking Ukraine ? Why ? Has ukraine signed a defense pact with america ? US will also get nuked to oblivion if they decide to engage in nuclear war with Russia.. Why should the americans risk nuclear war for the sake of an eastern European backwater ?

@scottgroves1010

Ай бұрын

🖕🫵

@The_MostHigh

Ай бұрын

Stop spreading fake news, the US will not nuke Russia for using nukes in Ukraine. Ukraine does not hold enough strategic importance to the US to risk US cities being vaporized by a Russian strike. That is the whole point of nuclear deterrence. The US therefore does not / will not face Russia in a conflict directly, only through proxies in limited means. If Russia uses nukes against a NATO state, that is a different conversation.

@romandawydiak4476

21 күн бұрын

"Fully informed"?? The only people who might be "fully informed" (as it pertains to the US Military) are the senior Generals and Admirals in the US High Command as well as certain key individuals in the Federal Government (such as the President and Secretary of Defence). As for the rest of us (this also includes "wannabe armchair and video game experts"), all we can do is guess at best.

@automatedrussianbot8043

18 күн бұрын

americans in 2024: was nuking japan justified to end the war faster? yes same americans if Russians ever start to think like them: WTF thats craaazy

"I don't know what weapons World War 3 will be fought with, but the KZread comment section will be full of people who think they are smart because they can quote Albert Einstein."

@anonym1984

Ай бұрын

"I pooped my pants" - Albert Einstein, age 4

@ChetManly2047

Ай бұрын

I applaud your pettiness 👏 it is something to behold.

@mr.monitor.

Ай бұрын

​@@anonym1984or some guy named Joe age 81

@RalphDavis-qk2xy

Ай бұрын

@@mr.monitor. Why don't you just go to Russia now?

@MrDubyadee1

Ай бұрын

@@mr.monitor. No but we have a lot of witness testimony claiming that DJT wears a diaper and freely unloads his bowls during meetings and other times. DJT also wears a man-girdle.

They would likely respond by announcing that Putin had died of a stroke.

These type of headlines are the same since 2022...😅

@user-sf5iq2fl1l

Ай бұрын

And you want to keep that way.... you dont want to say ever: "he really did it"

@toby9999

Ай бұрын

Why shouldn't they be? They'll probably be the same in 2025 as well.

@thebookdetective8745

Ай бұрын

Still true though.

@petru7696

Ай бұрын

Russia has been losing the war on the internet since the war started

@B.D.E.

Ай бұрын

Because russia has been threatening the world with nuclear war non stop since 2022.

Buck Turgidson: "I'm not saying we won't get our hair mussed..."

@kyleparish-aaron5764

Ай бұрын

I understood that reference! I do!

@Christmas-dg5xc

Ай бұрын

@@kyleparish-aaron5764 20-30 million, tops...

@kyleparish-aaron5764

Ай бұрын

@@Christmas-dg5xc depending on the breaks.

@Thor_Odinson

Ай бұрын

"Gentlemen you can't fight here...this is the War Room!!!"

@jmpalacios

Ай бұрын

@@Christmas-dg5xc depending on the breaks!

This is why Turkey was denied the F35

@owindustry

Ай бұрын

US recently said that Turkiye could have F35 planes if it wants to so they started to negotiate the terms again. Moreover, US has already approved 40 units of latest F16 jets and 80 units of F16 upgrade kits for existing fleet of Turkiye. In addition to that Turkiye has also managed to produce domestically its own fighter jet called "KAAN" and "HURJET".

@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044

Ай бұрын

Because it could be remotely disabled by the USA to ensure it was only used in circumstances explicitly approved by the USA

@joshjessicaolson-wg9xb

Ай бұрын

​@@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044sandbox guy says that the code thing isn't real

@niburu1508

Ай бұрын

@@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044 you enjoy your charades eh.

@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044

Ай бұрын

@@joshjessicaolson-wg9xb it's the software much like how a Tesla car is controlled

13:30. That is just gold. Pure gold

There are many videos on 'how US would react' and not enough videos on 'how US would prevent'.

@JacobErickson-cx4dy

Ай бұрын

The response would be the prevention. If we gave Russia the green light to do ignorant $h!t they would continue to do so. The United States does not have an endless supply of defense weapons to continually shoot down Russian strikes. I don't believe urging them to "talk it out" is a good idea either. Showing them consequences would most likely be the best way to get them to stop.

@classicgalactica5879

Ай бұрын

​@@JacobErickson-cx4dy The MAD Doctrine has worked well for decades. Hopefully it will continue to do so.

@zg8661

Ай бұрын

Usa is thinking to destroy Not Russia..not only Russia..usa can't win any war..any war.only way is that nato retreat on border from1989. Usa is only country that use nuclear weapons. Remember.usa figts against 75 percent of the world

@csclipdump

Ай бұрын

@@JacobErickson-cx4dy no, prevention happens before, response happens after

@emblink27

Ай бұрын

Exactly, prevent is more important!

"Live your life as if it's the last day of it" - now becomes very relevant.

USA wont risk New York for Kyiv.

@Diego-tm3dj

10 күн бұрын

Will Russia risk Moscow for Ukraine? Don't forget the weapons Russia has the west also has and better.

@rfranklin3000

9 күн бұрын

Will Russia risk St. Petersburg, Moscow, and Vladivostok? This goes both ways comrade.

@BranislavB-hx9zy

5 күн бұрын

Will Russia risk 75% of its territory which is Siberia, which China would take once Russia has lost the war?

@gamewadafak3655

4 күн бұрын

Dont forget the west doenst have the weapons russia has; hyperballistic nuclear rockets, russias nuclear weapons are very effective

@bhaskarrawat9012

3 сағат бұрын

​@@BranislavB-hx9zysure Russia is losing 🤡

Love the A-10. The thing about fighter aircraft is that you expect them to be cool, and they look as fast as they are. The A-10 no beauty queen, but it is one of the most badass aircraft ever made.

@peternorthrup6274

13 күн бұрын

Someday soon we will wish we had 10,000 A-10s. The fools want to retire them. WW2 was all about quantity.

@CIS101

13 күн бұрын

@@peternorthrup6274 Well that's two different things but related. I believe that in 1939 that both Europe, and the US had no idea what the US could accomplish in WW2, and the results by 1945 were utterly amazing. The A-10 has to be the most kick-ass ground support, and assault aircraft ever. I'm not sure how 10K of them would be used however. I once read where Herman Goering once tried to conquer some part of northern France using only the Luftwaffe - no ground troops. It was complete failure.

@unscinfinitydropshippalmer6146

7 күн бұрын

@@peternorthrup6274 its useless in modern combaty given it fought guys with donkey ... its useless against a real army dont be fooledby CALL OF DUTY games

@ggaggagga4

3 күн бұрын

It is, as long as it is used in a situation where the US already has air superiority.

@mattschultz8796

2 күн бұрын

The warthog squadron is basically a kamikaze with a payload to make anything shudder a10 payload is fast deployed and hell. Gorgeous planes but left hand of God.

Russia talks like their are the only ones with Nukes, and if their nukes are as good as the rest of their army...lol

This is insanity .

As it was said in the 1960s, there will be nobody left and who want the same leader to lead again if some survive.

@zackwhite8274

Ай бұрын

Actually there would be plenty of people that survived, I mean 30 thousand years after the asteroid wiped out 80% of life on the planet there were huge pockets of life already coming back, and humans are the most adaptable animal on the planet, there's been 5 mass extinction events and every time life makes it through, in the permian extinction 97% of all life was killed and it came back bigger and stronger than ever, this would be no diffrent.

@MissileD11

17 күн бұрын

Stop being a pacifist.

The first move in any war between Russia and NATO is, NATO would most likely seize Kaliningrad

@X9xredgkoa

Ай бұрын

and so what sherlock

@avadhutagita3741

12 күн бұрын

Why is Russia against NATO? Maybe then at least Russia, China and Iran are against NATO. This will be fair. Although no... Entire NATO doesn't have enough strength even to defeat Russia....economically, lol.

@michaelf3309

12 күн бұрын

@@avadhutagita3741 That we do not send many weapon systems to Ukraine for fear of them being too overpowered for Russia to hold the line against and Russia resorting to nukes makes it pretty evident that the USA alone would absolutely crush Russia. This is why we are forced to help Ukraine defend itself, otherwise Russia will next get its ass kicked by invading a NATO country and then resort to nukes out of desperation. As demonstrated by the Ukrainians, Russia is not the behemoth conventional adversary it was once believed to be. We assume though, because there exists insufficient evidence, that there is no reason to bet that Russia is no longer a nuclear adversary behemoth like no other. As far as "Why is Russia against NATO?", I suspect Russia's fear of losing the empire's hold over the 100+ conquered ethnicities and nationalistic fantasy of returning to the good old days of the USSR's power play a big role. Certainly NATO's hesitation to embrace a nation that remembers the monster Stalin as a hero plays its role too.

The real question would be the reaction of China. For that reason alone I don't think Russia would even consider using nuclear weapons. A limited response from your enemy is one. Alienating your frenemy is another can of worms.

The stealth drone does exist, i saw one in Afghanistan and we were told it doesnt exist and to not take pics or talk about it 😅

@12vibaba

18 күн бұрын

so shut up then.

@Ozmemt71638

14 күн бұрын

thank you for your service

@jb3058

14 күн бұрын

Would you like a microphone to announce that.

@wahyuindrasto8307

14 күн бұрын

So why did the Americans leave Afghanistan so suddenly? Were the Talibans THAT scary? The impression here is that Americans always cut and run when the going gets tough.

@jb3058

14 күн бұрын

@@wahyuindrasto8307 No, they left because they were training a country who didn’t want to fight for their freedom, therefore it was just completely useless.

“If WW3 is fought with nuclear weapons, then WW4 will be fought with bows and arrows” - Prince Charles, now King Charles 3.

@JamesOfEarth

3 күн бұрын

If he said it, he plagiarized Einstein.

Pretty sure no one will survive here. Peace and dialog is whats needed.

"What do you think?" I think that Russia would escalate to Strategic weapons incliding ICBM MIRVs. And humanity might survive extinction--or it might not.

Dog barks the loudest doesn’t bite.

@hegemonycricket9549

28 күн бұрын

Or, as my granny said, "The empty bucket rattles loudest."

@pl7868

26 күн бұрын

Had siberian husky ,pitbull mongrel an he couldn't bark when people came over the fence in the backyard to break in he walked up an grabbed them they never heard it coming all you heard was screams an had to go outback pull him off an call the cops an give him a biscut say good boy

@ggaggagga4

3 күн бұрын

Until he does. THEN WHAT?

The us isn't immune to nukes. What is this title.

@MeepChangeling

Ай бұрын

@user-nw8zm2wu6o Nukes are not instant nationstate deleters, and we don't need every single city we have to keep going. Do you think a few nukes could cause a nuclear winter or make a wasteland or something? They can't. We've blown up thousands of those things since we invented them. You're aware that Heroshima and Nagasaki were safe to be in after a week, right? Do you think radiation works how it does in Fallout games?

@melonenlord2723

Ай бұрын

@user-nw8zm2wu6o It's even questionable how many nukes are even functional. There will be a lot of duds. Nukes need a lot of maintance and with the corruption level in russia, the money they get for it might often not used for that. It's hard to say but fising a nuke is not that easy. It needs a well done mechanism, else it's just a rocket loaded with a lot of radioactive material that wouldn't explode.

@Botanifiles

Ай бұрын

The type of nuclear weapon and its design influence the radiation produced. There are two main types: fission bombs, which split heavy atomic nuclei like uranium or plutonium, creating radioactive fallout, and fusion bombs, which combine light atomic nuclei, typically producing less fallout but still some radiation. Fusion bombs are often less radioactive because their fusion reactions produce fewer long-lived radioactive isotopes compared to the fission process. Various factors, including yield, design, and detonation conditions, impact the type and amount of radiation released.

@AdrianFahrenheitTepes

Ай бұрын

@@melonenlord2723 The President of the United States knows more than you. He isn’t taking that risk. That speaks louder than any conjecture you’re making.

@melonenlord2723

Ай бұрын

@AdrianFahrenheitTepes Sure we shouldn't take that risk. Even one functional nuke coming through would be catastrophic.

Nobody would survive that’s the correct summary of this this video

@leedex

Ай бұрын

Feel very safe in Asia. My gold investment will sky rock 🤑

@JusticeGranville-uk8ww

Ай бұрын

​@@leedex😂😂😂

@ToonamiAftermath

Ай бұрын

Did you even watch the video?

@user-js9qf2bc1x

Ай бұрын

@@leedexyou think somewhere in Asia is safe? Hope ya got about 10 years of food and water stored up in a deep deep cave!

@iamthegamepro

Ай бұрын

nuclear war…. It will never ever happen. The scientist that created these weapons leaked the specs to all world powers to make sure one super power has all the power.

I just had a thought, how technolical are the Nukes? Yes they are nukes, but how accurate are they, how powerful, what condition are they in compared to Western weapons? Are they even operational like the rest of their equipment in Ukraine?

@philv2529

17 күн бұрын

The tritium in Russia's nukes has probably decayed by now.

@k.s.7045

12 күн бұрын

That is insane… Russia has in time one of the highest tech Missilse. Dont think a Nuklear War can be won bey one side.

@Ademirb123

12 күн бұрын

They say the same about their guns, but l wouldn't dare to be at the other end of an Ak47

@cameronhermann9400

12 күн бұрын

@@Ademirb123 well AKs at least are by design good quality. They can be dunked in water, mud, sand, and even under a body(according to a tale I heard a long time ago) and still shoot. Everything else Russias has is always over hyped

@mtsky-tc6uw

12 күн бұрын

@@cameronhermann9400 that is why usa used russian rockets for years to go to the space shuttle eh...your brain is over hyped--russia is way advanced in many areas along with china --russia has nuke shelter for over half its people,usa next to none

"Unlike Russia, when the U.S. makes military threats it's not prone to bullshit!" 😆 😅It's funny cuz it's true!

@aj9969

Ай бұрын

Yeah.. Just like in Afghanistan

@vicdor1031

Ай бұрын

Just like in Vietnam😅

@Vexas345

Ай бұрын

​@aj9969 If Russia goes like Afghanistan, 90% of Russia will be occupied by NATO, including Moscow, and, after Putin gets killed hiding like coward then dumped into the Artic sea, what's left of the Russia government will hide in China until the US decides it's tired of controlling Russian territory and leaves. Sounds acceptable.

@toddlawrence6872

Ай бұрын

Lol I love it when you trolls bring those up. Vietnam was a war to stop the spread of communism, how many communist countries are there today vs then? Afghanistan, we went there because they were harboring terrorists. Any terrorist that mattered and anyone in Taliban leadership at the time is dead now and I can guarantee you that the current Taliban leadership will do everything in its power to make sure we never have a reason to come back. On the other hand the Soviets were there for only 6 years and collapsed shortly after that. I would also like to point out that the RU army has suffered more casualties in 2 years of war in Ukraine than all US casualties combined since WW2.

@RalphDavis-qk2xy

Ай бұрын

@@vicdor1031 Just like ORCS.

B-52 still going strong. 💪

@kostakiskonstantinou5545

Ай бұрын

😂

@magna4100

Ай бұрын

An ancient fucking TURKEY.

@hegemonycricket9549

28 күн бұрын

Yep. Ponder this for a second. I'm 60yrs old. The newest B52 is older than I am, and is scheduled to be in service for another ~20yrs. Crazy.

@mtsky-tc6uw

12 күн бұрын

flying targets just like anything that floats,rolls,in a real war they are gone in the first hour and why russia,china have hundreds of thousands of missiles,rockets--usa,nato are stupid

when i need something to cheer me up i watch the military show. the best comedy show on you tube.

Nobody win...all of us gonna die in the first 1 hour

@mbormann6046

25 күн бұрын

The people that started it all will stay alive in their bunkers for years.

@tomislavivankovic6971

24 күн бұрын

it is not about personal win and survival, rather about personal sacrifice for future and survival of your nation!

@petejames1326

24 күн бұрын

beautifully said bro☺🤭😵‍💫👀

@bengaltiger1289

23 күн бұрын

​@@tomislavivankovic6971 ​There'll literally be N O T H l N G left. This war is unwinnable apart from negotiating with Russia for peace, otherwise Its beyond any discussion. Extinction is the only path of a nuclear war

@TheMexicoBear

22 күн бұрын

Only rats and flies win in wars.

Even with a really limited nuclear exchange (1-2 each side), breaking the nearly 80 year streak of no one using nukes besides for testing (and since the mid 60s only underground tests were allowed) would mean the world could never again be the same. Like how the US was never really the same after 9/11 but this would be on a far greater scale.

@Reddotzebra

Ай бұрын

Yeah, it would irradiate more steel so that it could not be used for astronomy purposes again in many lifetimes, it would throw off all calculations for carbon 14 in tooth enamel making it harder for criminal investigators to determine the age of corpses, it would possibly require more soil treatment for areas of the most fertile part of Europe and in fourth place it might make some people more likely to use tactical nukes in the future, now that they have actually seen how much damage they cause. Oh wait, this is like climate change right, one nuke used is one too many?

@rickfrombohemia9550

25 күн бұрын

France did atmospheric tests in Polynesia until 1974.

@JohnSmith-zw8vp

25 күн бұрын

@@rickfrombohemia9550 And what did the Polynesians have to say about that?

@CakePrincessCelestia

15 күн бұрын

Russia literally nuked someone in London in 2006 if you think about it...

@k.s.7045

12 күн бұрын

Eure Nation ist die einzige die jemals Atomwaffen gegen ein anderes Land eingesetzt und über Großstädten abgeworfen hat. Ihr solltet was dieses Thema betrifft mit etwas mehr bedacht herangehen.

Empire Of Lies 🇺🇲

@JanB56

Ай бұрын

shitting your pants already Ivan?

Considering that the former nuclear power plant in Chernobyl... (Yes, THAT Chernobyl.) is between Kiyv and the border with Belarus, that would seem to make the likelihood of Russian tactical nuclear weapons use a little more possible...

Purely hypothetical. Let's hope that peace can attained beforehand.

@petermartin2054

20 күн бұрын

And if it isn't?

@CakePrincessCelestia

15 күн бұрын

That requires "removing" the KGB Mafia gov't completely.

@aleksandarruben9395

15 күн бұрын

US will never agree to a peace agreement, they want to fight the Russians until the last Ukrainian

China’s primary fear of Nuclear escalation is they are immediately down wind. 😂

Brother in arms, blood is thicker than water . Wisdom wins . Preparedness prevents war but assured peace .

Certainly, the US can carry out a strike like this and cause great harm to Russia, but a strike like this will not be a picnic and the Russian response that will come after it will be very ugly and Europe will certainly pay the biggest price

@mark.r

Ай бұрын

I honestly don’t think they do.. they don’t have the capability to launch tons of nukes at once, they don’t even have good air defence...

@leaderofthepack39

Ай бұрын

Europeans would literally be gengis khans footstool and been annihilated by the Turks if the Russians didn't fight them for so long, same with the Nazis and Napoleon

@worldwide8587

Ай бұрын

@@mark.rwho are you referring to?

@SIGNALFREQ

Ай бұрын

@@mark.rDon’t Fucc around and find out 🤞☢️

@hia5235

Ай бұрын

The US is as close as Europe over the North Pole

"I demolish my bridges behind me, then there is no choice but to move forward." - Fridtjof Nansen

For all we know, the US could hack any incoming projectile and send it back to its origin. Ouch!

@k.s.7045

12 күн бұрын

That is a nice Bed Time Story, but wen Nukes fly the Planet will be Ash.

@danwentz

12 күн бұрын

What Plant?? Dude make sense!

@mtsky-tc6uw

12 күн бұрын

russia china can jam anything,make it go haywire or cease to function--usa,nato knows this so i see nothing going to happen--russia has nuke shelter for over half its people also--all of russian missiles,rockets are shielded,cannot jam

@seeitasitis

11 күн бұрын

Russia have the best electronic warfare

@willyg1434

11 күн бұрын

@@seeitasitis 😆

The force multiplier effect can easily overwhelm the enemy even just by using conventional weapons. The enemy would be attacked from many directions all weather , day , night, stealth and with conventional air superiority it would be all over in 24 hours .

@AfiaA.-vb3xz

Ай бұрын

'you always have a plan before you get punched in the face"

@dr.strangelove5708

19 күн бұрын

I second that from a guy who been in a real fight and not on a keyboard on KZread.

@YMagoulo

14 күн бұрын

24 hrs? It took a month just to bring down Iraq's defenses during Desert Storm

@wahyuindrasto8307

14 күн бұрын

YUPP!! And Iraq was a piece of cake while Afghanistan was a stroll in the garden. Also Iran was supposed to be as easy to flip as a pancake. How did all that turn out for y'all, huh?

@YMagoulo

14 күн бұрын

@@wahyuindrasto8307 Don't get carried away. Iran might be formidable within their borders but outside they are not. Their recent attack on Israel was a joke.

I truly laugh at the analogy that Putin would actually launch a nuclear device in Ukraine knowing the capability of the European Union and the United States to rain down hell on him

@elessartelcontar9415

Ай бұрын

Would NATO cause the end of the human race for Ukraine? I think not. I believe that The West would make large conventional attacks, many in Russia itself. But not so destructive for it to cross Putin's line of threatening the survival of Russia. Since, in this scenario, Putin used tactical nukes in Ukraine, would NATO use tactical nukes in our response? I think not for the same reason as too large of a NATO conventional attack.

@JusticeGranville-uk8ww

Ай бұрын

​@@elessartelcontar9415That man is talking poop.... If Russia strikes Ukraine with nukes ... US would do nothing...if they try to play stupid games and hit any Russian platform Its an open nuclear war between Russia against every country that makes up NATO 🙇🏻‍♀️

@Gmordor

Ай бұрын

@@elessartelcontar9415 , having a war criminal on power could also be your end

@enocksnyadondo1308

Ай бұрын

go to the statistics of nuclea war heads the rest of Europe and all Nato members including USA, UK etc. their nuvlea asernal is less from Russias nuclea asernal.

@ScorgRus

Ай бұрын

'Rain down hell'? The only hell possible would be in Europe.

12:50 - "...intercepted BY the target's main hull" would be more accurate

What also Russia can't see is our new B-21 UCAV Stealth Bomber 😁

@tara1941

21 күн бұрын

WW3 will not be fought using Bombers , its 2024 now not 1941

@JR-sn8cf

18 күн бұрын

What does that even mean when it won’t have a home to return to it land. This macho and bravado nonsense is useless with nuclear inhalation.

@mtsky-tc6uw

12 күн бұрын

they can see it easily--a farce--anything that flys or floats is a target

@jagmiddleton

4 күн бұрын

what the yanks cant see is russias new posidon nuke torpedo with a 100 megaton warhead goodby the big apple

7:44 No American wants a nuclear war. But don’t think the possibility of one will stop the US and our citizens from defending ourselves and our allies.

Omg unlike Russia when the US makes threats they're not bullshit ! I love it 😂

@jonathanrivera4541

Ай бұрын

Putin threatened to invade Ukraine and he did 🤔

@gameaddict7544

Ай бұрын

LOL, its amazing the foolery people post in these chats. US won't initiate a nuclear attack unless its been attack first, all that article 5 Bullshit means nothing when millions of your country men could be wipe out in seconds.

@jesussamayoa7605

28 күн бұрын

With countries with out power. Why they don’t do anything against russia.. and other things, they like to do shits using other countries in front of them. They just provide weapons only.

@avadhutagita3741

12 күн бұрын

omg, has been threatening to "tear Russia's economy to shreds" for 10 years now, since the time of Obama (2014).

@mavonisamabasa6816

11 күн бұрын

They are not bullshit against Afghanistan, Iraq and the likes, but not against Russia. It won't dare make that move, or else it would be history. Russia is no joke. Russia is NATO's worst nightmare.

You guys are silly. An increased security in Russias airbases= U.S response to nuclear war. Get outta here man

@cameronhermann9400

Ай бұрын

Clarify, what do you mean?

@raymonschepers994

23 күн бұрын

Please add at least some context if you post out such irrationally placed counterclaims?

@leighkite1164

21 күн бұрын

Ah yeah, and what's "increased security" in Russia? They switch from vodka to coffee? By the time they sobered up, it would all be done. 🤣

yes because they have PRONOUN TRAINING - Thats their secret weapon LMAO

Will any any of the two nations survive it

Don't our satellites keep track of their movable nukes? Can they do it?

@HalfTonChevy

13 күн бұрын

Of course

What if the missiles are already in place?

Where do these folks get the idea that Ukraine is losing support. Wake up everyone has doubled down with more help.

@OleDiaBole

Ай бұрын

Remember when Ukraine was flooded with 200bn weapons for their amazing counteroffensive? Remember what stelar sucess it was? What do you think 60bn will change? It will prolong Ukrainian demise and make it more bloody.

@jw8567

Ай бұрын

Well, well let me see. Going on three years for a three week "SMO" that didn't happen. Meat waves attacking instead of trained, prepared or equipped soldiers. I like Ukraine's chances of outlasting Moscovia.

@rikashvanveelen993

Ай бұрын

​@@OleDiaBole remember putin his " 3 days to kyiv " , those days are quite long already? Russia's best men are gone already, and wich outcome he think he will get from this war? Embarssed his own country,the red army just proves to be camo wearing folks with guns wich doesnt work properly or are not even trained, the majestical su57 is still a mythe, and they use a lot of outdated material (wich is kinda funny since ukraine had even more older soviet stuff but theirs functioning more than russia's own material) and offers their own people to either join army and die or go to jail for not joining army and only get out if they do (or they fall out of their windows 🤡) Best for russia is to retreat and war will end, simple as that If ukraine stops defending there will be no ukraine left Either putin retreats or GIVE UKRAINE ALL THE SUPPORT THEY NEED Because before war, i think everyone would know some russian guy and we all liked them as people we met at travelling, when going out, but their government is fucking that image of russians in general wich this dumb war

@anthonytrevino3191

Ай бұрын

@@jw8567 I guess the biggest loss of war (Avdiika) was taken by shovels as well?. kyslivka & Netailove were just taken today: the front lines are collapsing. A Ukrainian brigade fled a Russian advance at Krasnorivka today. If you actually followed the conflict instead of parrot CNN or whatever KZread videos you watched from 2022, you will know Russian has advantage of manpower, resources, and time. How can Ukraine outlast Russia when they are literally forcing conscriptions and Russian military is bigger now than it was day of invasion. You are horribly misinformed

@Ticktopapi

Ай бұрын

Yes , double support , theble losses 😂😂😂

Russian "bear"😂....koala bear yeah.

@kramer1916

Ай бұрын

plush bear

@electricspeedkiller8950

Ай бұрын

usa won't do shit.

@skywillfindyou

Ай бұрын

ah such pleasant copium

@crocowithaglocko5876

Ай бұрын

@@electricspeedkiller8950that’s some good copium, where can I get some

@Joe-Przybranowski

Ай бұрын

Let's all cling to our ignorant perspectives and laugh haha

Why do canopies on aircraft bulb outside the profile of the planes. Like with the F35 they have video relay to pilots helmets displaying the are so why not put the pilot inside the fuselage more thus lowering drag

USA hasn’t faced a peer on peer conflict in a long while. Russia now has battle hardened troops . They also have the ability to vaporise USA and uk along with its allies in a blink of an eye.

What nucleat threat number are we from bunker grandpa and his serfs are we on by today? Number 20?

@MeepChangeling

Ай бұрын

38

@elessartelcontar9415

Ай бұрын

The human race is at a moment of historic danger: The Doomsday Clock is still 90 seconds to midnight! 90 seconds away from the destruction of human civilization and possibly the human race. Some history helps with context as to the significance of the Clock; Founded in 1945 by Albert Einstein, J. Robert Oppenheimer, and University of Chicago scientists who helped develop the first atomic weapons in the Manhattan Project, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists created the Doomsday Clock two years later, using the imagery of apocalypse (midnight) and the contemporary idiom of nuclear explosion (countdown to zero) to convey threats to humanity and the planet. The Doomsday Clock is set every year by the Bulletin’s Science and Security Board in consultation with its Board of Sponsors, which includes nine Nobel laureates. The Clock has become a universally recognized indicator of the world’s vulnerability to global catastrophe caused by man-made technologies.

Russia has been warned. Don't even think of going there!

@allansmith3837

Ай бұрын

Lmao 😂

@craigharrison5406

Ай бұрын

They know it. They would have already used tactical nukes in Ukraine if they thought they could get away with it.

@buravan1512

12 күн бұрын

They will... And NATO Will never react.

@craigharrison5406

12 күн бұрын

@@buravan1512 No they won't. The only country with the nerve to actually use nukes in an armed conflict is the US. Russia just talks blah blah blah.

Those drones are really cool.They are actually radio control model airplanes,only more complicated.

The headline is wrong. You should say : "How will US get destroyed if it keeps poking Russia by means of the proxy war in the so called Ukraine" 😊

We’re done….good bye life on earth

@ronaldphillips8750

6 күн бұрын

I agree cousin.

Video was well done, but title was deceptive and at least bordered on clickbait.

It was a 6 week air and missile campaign in Desert Storm. I was there!

USA is a quiet beast not russia a Noise Maker

what is he gonna do with ukraine if he turns it into nuclear wasteland,makes no sense

@AdrianFahrenheitTepes

Ай бұрын

But he’s going to nuke because he’s losing. That’s the story you are supposed to be hearing.

@briansimon8969

Ай бұрын

Putin will not nuke Ukraine that’s for sure. Fight for the country and then make it wasteland? Nope

@DavidGitongawriter

Ай бұрын

@@AdrianFahrenheitTepes Ha ha. Well put. Ukraine has already won the media war.

@andrewalderman9489

Ай бұрын

Considering how effective the US Navy was at helping fight off the Iranian missiles, which are Russian clones, Ukraine is unlikely to come to the point of being attacked in such a matter.

@suvahomescape4665

Ай бұрын

​@@andrewalderman9489It's a warned strike, also most of the projectile are bait

Things would get really proportional, really fast.

@hegemonycricket9549

28 күн бұрын

Aha! A kindred spirit. All praise @FatElectrician !

You mean like when Bushy Jr. said US was going into Iraq for weapons of mass destruction?

End of History, and the Last Man Standing

why would china tell putin to knock off the sabre rattling???

@Chriscraft50

Ай бұрын

They want Russia to lose and at their weakest. Then swoop in and take back Manchuria.

@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044

Ай бұрын

​@2girls1shovelquite so as long as both feel in contention with the USA they need eachother if they marginalise the USA the reason to bond will diminish

“Have no fear for atomic energy, cause non of them can stop the time..” Bob Marley.

@humidiflymusic1578

13 күн бұрын

Irie!!!!

@ns7353

3 күн бұрын

What an insightful eloquent commentary

thats a really nice evaluation. Thanks❤

We have to wait and see.

russian bots in 3..2..1..

@recgar

Ай бұрын

I see the American bots already got started

@QueenElizabeth1sth

Ай бұрын

Russia strong! 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

@vernor2767

Ай бұрын

braaap

@vernor2767

Ай бұрын

Take meds

@dessmith7658

Ай бұрын

Controlled 🇷🇺

Russia couldn’t even stop a bunch of farmers.😛

@sharmasudhir7243

23 күн бұрын

BUNCH OF FARMERS WITH US AND ENTIRE EUROPE WEAPONS DOESNT HAVE A COUNTRY HALF OF IT IS WITH RUSSIA 😂

@michaelvoisine7075

23 күн бұрын

Still a bunch of farmers. You think Putin would attack a country with an army that could defend it self? No…

@FireF1y644

22 күн бұрын

keep living in delusions

@sharmasudhir7243

22 күн бұрын

@@michaelvoisine7075 WELL ENTIRE EUROPE AND NATO HAS SENT BEST ARMS RUSSIANS ARE FIGHTING FOR PAST ONE YEAR UKRAINE COMEDIAN PRESIDENT HAS LOST HALF OF HIS COUNTRY

@dr.strangelove5708

19 күн бұрын

The same farmers that the US encountered in Iraq and Afghanistan? Oh do not forget Vietnam.

In reality, Russia rarely sold refined oil. perhaps, after starting the war, it boosted crude oil sales.

Rissia wouldn't have a chance against us🤔

@buravan1512

12 күн бұрын

You don't want to see that scenario, do you? 😂

This is a stupid caption….If the bear uses nukes there won’t be anything left of the nukeee to respond at all…..

Delusional! That is a serious problem. Get help.

As of 5:25 does that mean that Russia has no missile silos ?

The Missile Knows Where It Is...

The idea is to prevent their use.

@bixbysnyder-00

Ай бұрын

The US won't be first-use. Putin on the other hand, I'm not so sure

@craigharrison5406

Ай бұрын

both sides having them is the prevention. Neither side can stop the return volley. Even if Russia nuked the Pentagon, US AWACS aircraft would assume command and control of US nuclear subs around the world. I'm sure Russia had similar redundancies in place if Moscow was hit. There is no escape or "winning" for either side. That is what has prevented nuclear weapons from being used for over 70 years and it's not changing any time soon. Don't bother listening to the saber rattling from Putin. In the 70's and 80's the nuclear rhetoric was even worse than it is now.

6 companies own all media in the world. So there's that

@bixbysnyder-00

Ай бұрын

Who owns the media in Russia? 🤔

@treopl

Ай бұрын

​@@bixbysnyder-00Putin of course. But who cares? Russia is such a great country that does not invade other nations and threats with nuclear weapons to ensure no one can aid invaded country directly.

"I don't know what weapons WWIII will be fought with, but KZreadrs will Surely Claim that they are ***'UNDER-RATED!!!'***" 😳😊

The information is so dense. It's hard to absorb it!

I don't know if automatic by KZread or a setting by the content creator but these double ads in the beginning AND middle AND end of this video is excessive

@Joe-Przybranowski

Ай бұрын

AdBlock exists for a reason

@bixbysnyder-00

Ай бұрын

I got tired of ads. Premium is worth it. Other than that, find a good ad blocker

@andrewgrosset9327

24 күн бұрын

Adblock plus, also works well on X.

@77.88.

20 күн бұрын

U Tube in the last few days has tripled or many more ads I guess they are trying to become Zillionaires in 60 days???

Exactly how competent is the Russian nuclear weapons? We know how competent the military and equipment are!!! lmao

@user-xn8iv4er4k

Ай бұрын

Хочешь проверить?)

@apokatastasian2831

Ай бұрын

they've been pushing all of nato back with shovels and turtle tanks

@tiamiyujamiuoukoga5306

Ай бұрын

So the west overated their weapons and they were all destroyed. How many hundreds of billions of dollars worth of western weapons have been sent to Ukraine? All destroyed by Russian weapons

@JR-sn8cf

18 күн бұрын

Why don’t you find out? Hiding behind a keyboard ?? 😅

Ground News sounds interesting.

This seems like a really irresponsible way to talk about something so serious.

This guy lost me when he mentioned 'Desert Storm.' It took us 6 months to get the necessary men and equipment in place for that attack. With zero resistance...

@damiion666

Ай бұрын

1) US has various existing nato air bases already in Europe with shorter routes into the region. 2) US wouldn’t have to send any land forces since its response would be mainly air strikes, therefore wouldn’t need long prep times. In desert storm, 20% of air launched munitions were smart bombs, today it’s more than 90%. 3) You also were lost when he mentioned the fact that the preparation to use nukes would be detected by satellite surveillance/intelligence.

you do understand they have as many assets ready to launch as we do right.... this isn't oh we need to load up first kind of scenario.

@Joe-Przybranowski

Ай бұрын

Very little thought going on here

@chetpomeroy1399

Ай бұрын

Nobody wants to be turned into radioactive ash. Those in control of nuclear missile bases don't want that to happen to their loved ones -- their kids and grandkids.

@Jadefox32

Ай бұрын

comes down to capabilities and I'll keep with Western tech because Nato wargear actually works. Eastern wargear depends entirely on how poor an individual is and whether selling the part is worth it.

An excellent description of response options.

Stop all wars , no winners

Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face 😂😂😂 USA had plans on Abram tanks too😂😂

@Gmordor

Ай бұрын

🤣… how many ruzzian tanks are over 😁

@itz_redgi9624

Ай бұрын

​@@Gmordor How many NATO tanks are destroyed 😂

@rasheedh7043

Ай бұрын

@@GmordorSoviet Tanks helped both Ukraine and Russia to gain territories left and right and on the other hand, Abrams,Leopards and Challengers did absolutely nothing except getting barbecued 😂

Fear leads to hate according to the Jedi.

We can't beat our m , , t without others help.

United Kingdom/Great Britain 🇬🇧 (UK/GB) vs North Korea 🇰🇵 (NK/DPRK), who would win in a conflict without nukes involved

@GizzyDillespee

Ай бұрын

Where do they fight? Why, and how? They're about as far away as countries can get, as the ship sails...

@user-vg7mu6yn5o

Ай бұрын

Brittain would not have to fight alone.

@ristolehto3877

Ай бұрын

no chance at all if it were to measure up to the west.NK has nooo

@ArthurMorgantherealone

Ай бұрын

If UK invaded NK they lose If NK invades UK they lose. It's a lose lose situation

@D3ViLTh3OrY

Ай бұрын

I'm not sure North Korea have much animosity towards the UK, there are embassies in both nations.

So, was Russia that reckless to rely on Western technology for oil refining?

@meteorknight999

Ай бұрын

West wasnt expected to backstab and become unfairly hostile post 1995. It slowly tried to harm like boiling a frog

@JanB56

Ай бұрын

no choice

@ronchasr6656

28 күн бұрын

all russian tech is western tech. russia dosent make anything except war. (they couldnt even make a car. remember the lada?)

@meteorknight999

28 күн бұрын

@@ronchasr6656 and you are still losing with best nato missiles, drones, tanks, air defense failing against them ? You are losing lol

@mikeqofiy3693

25 күн бұрын

Stop dreaming mate!!!​@@meteorknight999

In the 60s we had technology which could read a license plate from 100 miles away. When clouds covered the target the photos weren't available but now it is no problem. We now can even see through jungle canopy plus much more. I would caution Putin not do do something stupid!

@mavonisamabasa6816

11 күн бұрын

Do you know who put the first man in space?

Enjoy every day while the skis are clear...as no day is guaranteed.

Wouldn't tactical Nukes block Russia's ability to be able to pass through because of radiation. Therefore narrowing lanes they can attack through, making it easier to defend those lines. (Assuming quantities of losses of where they are targeting isn't significant)

@AdrianFahrenheitTepes

Ай бұрын

Very little long lasting radioactive fallout if the nuclear weapon detonated properly.

@elessartelcontar9415

Ай бұрын

The fallout from atomic bombs falls down to a safe level in just a couple of days bion.

@davidhughes4489

Ай бұрын

@@AdrianFahrenheitTepes Many thanks

@jakemeyer8188

Ай бұрын

Just ask the Russian soldiers who dug all those foxholes in Pripyat how the Russian military feels about fallout...

The bear only has a bark !

Putin just retreat and save your men

The inevitable will eventually come...the battle between The Bear , The Dragon and The Eagle. Not a damned bit of GOOD will become of it either. We are doomed.

MAID - MUTUAL ASSURED INTERNET DISCONNECTION

@dandering181

27 күн бұрын

😄😄 clever👍

@dr.strangelove5708

19 күн бұрын

Among other things but the Great Disconnect might finally wake them up :)