how do you only have 190 subs with this production quality??? criminally underrated

Hey, I am doing a project for school and would like to know what the name of the glasses you bought are, hopefully I can find them on Amazon. If you have a link that would be awesoeme. Thank You so much :)

@ooqui

23 күн бұрын

It depends on what effect you're looking for. For red monochromacy you need glasses with lenses that have a strong (and pure) red tint. The same goes for green and blue. For dichromacies color mixtures of these 3 colors. To simulate protanopia (red blindness) you need strong cyan tinted glasses and for tritanopia (blue blindness strong yellow tinted glasses. However, you cannot accurately simulate deuteranopia (green blindness) with merely tinted lenses, due to how human color vision works. In general, the better the color quality of the lenses, the better they simulate a reduced color vision. For starters I recommend Anaglyph 3D-glasses due to their relatively low price. They always come in a pair of two complementary lens colors, so you'll have a different color effect in each. But you can just close one eye. The cyan of the red/cyan Anaglyph 3D-glasses is almost always perfect for simulating protanopia. Yellow tinted lenses are quite rare for 3D-glasses. But there are magenta/green 3D-glasses. Google for "Rainbow Synmphony" and you'll find a website with a lot of such special effects glasses. The quality is quite okay for their price, but buy at your own discretion.

This is fascinating!

Pretty interesting

This is not fully correct. Colour vision works on opponent processes and not lacking a colour from RGB. The fact that so called red and green cones, actually peaking in yellow and green) are very close together means that protan and deuteranopia will appear very similar as the same opponent process (red-green) is affected and the remainng red or green cones function similarly! Thus deuteranopia (green blindness) will not look like a blue red spectrum and cannot be simulated with magenta glasses as shown in this video

@ooqui

4 ай бұрын

You are correct that you cannot 100% correctly simulate "real" deuteranopia with magenta colored glasses. However, the method shown in this video is the closest normal trichromats can get to a color vision similar to deuteranopia without active technology. This simulated deuteranopia and real deuteranopia are not the same, but spreaking from personal experience I can say that real life colors (like those from trees, flowers, etc.) look very similar to the "real" deuteranopia's colors. Deuteranopia is in fact the only dichromacy you cannot 100% correctly simulate with such passive tinted glasses. On the opponent process between the three cones: In my personal experience I find the opponent process theory not entirely accurate. While protanopia and deuteranopia will look more similar than e.g deuteranopia and tritanopia, if you'd compare both side by side, both protanopia and deuteranopia send different information to the brain. That's why if you had deuteranopia in your left and protanopia in your right eye you would still functionally be a trichromat. Such a color vision would be weird and work with impossible binocular dichromatic color combinations, but it would behaviorly be very similar to normal trichromacy. The L ("red") and M ("green") cone types are indeed relatively close together, but they're distinct enough to send unique information to the brain. From my experience a deuteranope's color vision would look red and blue, with a dichromatic "white" as their midpoint. And protanopia would look green and blue, again with a dichromatic "white" as the two colors' midpoint. It doesn't matter whether the red/green is actually a red, a green, or a yellow for these two color visions, but what matters is that they send different color information to the brain. To a red-green dichromat, whether they're a deutan or protan, the actual color experience of the only two opposing dichromatic colors wouldn't matter because both colors would naturally be complementary.

@maciejzajaczkowski4965

4 ай бұрын

@@ooqui I still diagree, I think the closest normal trichromats can get to deuteranopia is to have a narrow bandpass at each other their cone peak sensitivities of blue and yelow. Yes the this should make the oranges and greens equally bright and indistinguishable with the drawback of darkening red. Using a magenta lens skews the darkness of the greens a lot and misrepresents the indistinugiability of the oranges and greens

@ooqui

4 ай бұрын

@@maciejzajaczkowski4965 I made the mistake of generalizing without any specification. Of course there are other methods to simulate color vision deficiencies like deuteranopia more accurately. The easiest way to simulate the (probably) most accurate representation of a form of deuteranopia is with digital technology and using color altering algorithms. And you're also right that the magenta glasses do not perfectly simulate deuteranopia/-omaly, but they're closer to this reduced color vision than to typical trichromacy or any other dichromacies.