ATTENTION: Due to continues misbelief and skepticism, usually without any experience backing up these claims, I would like to signal an audio authority, Paul McGowan who claims the effectiveness of these solutions here: kzread.info/dash/bejne/d6V1pM58gsWuaNo.html So you think it's just 1s and 0s and that if it's there it's there if it's not it's not right? Wrong! Digital is much more complex and several filters and corrections are at work and may degrade strongly the signal. Here is some info on this topic: 1 - Vibration control helps any type of gear. All producers all over the world in decent CD players have introduced vibration control solutions inside them and for the chassis due to acoustic and mechanical resonance issues (which create vibrations) and issues in the rotation and also the electronic components that are present in all standard players (for example capacitors). Errors may occur and the wrong correction of these can bring to sonic degradation (see point 2), and the reduction of these errors can occur also by reducing vibrations. In any case I am not focusing exclusively on the laser beam. Adding more control will help the existing vibration control solutions integrated in the player and also the other processes that take place inside the player. Vibrations can introduce noise and distortion. Check this chapter of this world famous engineer, Ken Pohlmann and what he says about vibrations with CD players: books.google.it/books?id=Ed388jKoOfQC&pg=PA177&lpg=PA177&dq=compact+disc+resonance+vibration&source=bl&ots=SF3LRPJ35e&sig=ACfU3U2InhLfpij7n4HKHUyJD1HOvyHxFg&hl=it&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjXgcPw1qjmAhXH2aQKHb6TBv04ChDoATAEegQIChAE#v=onepage&q=vibration%20is%20bad&f=false 2 - OK, its pits and lands, but let’s not forget that the laser in a CD player is not truly reading data, it is scanning the surface to search for a pit or a land and based on what the laser finds it is reflects back (land=1) or not (pit=0), which then is transformed by the photoelectric cell in electric current according to the received signal (1s or 0s). The electronic circuit recreates the pattern that was scanned etc. As you can imagine things can go wrong here, striating from the lens. People always focus on the pick up but never think of the handling of the signal in its digital form and then analog form in a CD player. Here vibrations already can create issues and the Auric helps in the reading of this scanning and the rotation of the disc, which is never perfect. Going back to the lens cleaner the laser and the reflection may be obstructed by dirt. Yes, the disk can skip in the worse scenario, but it can also introduce sonic degradation do to the INTERPOLATION (concealment) of the error correction codec. That is the software that is guessing how the sound could be, producing a faulty recreation of the signal with a bandwidth lowering and overall quality. Again Ken Pohlmann discusses of the importance to keep the lens clean for best performance: books.google.it/books?id=Ed388jKoOfQC&pg=PA177&lpg=PA177&dq=compact+disc+resonance+vibration&source=bl&ots=SF3LRPJ35e&sig=ACfU3U2InhLfpij7n4HKHUyJD1HOvyHxFg&hl=it&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjXgcPw1qjmAhXH2aQKHb6TBv04ChDoATAEegQIChAE#v=snippet&q=lens%20cleaning&f=false Most importantly, in this page of the book by engineers Rumsey and Mccormick you can read about the effects of interpolation during error correction: books.google.it/books?id=Y477AwAAQBAJ&pg=PA263&lpg=PA263&dq=error+correction+interpolation+sound&source=bl&ots=uOwC25bkpa&sig=ACfU3U3P0jdRXZ_YJW4w4SRJF2kha2ysyQ&hl=it&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiyg76_-ajmAhUhIMUKHZyMDksQ6AEwBXoECAkQBA#v=onepage&q=error%20correction%20interpolation%20sound&f=false On the IMPERFECTION of digital and how these and other solutions can actually help the sound quality: www.stereophile.com/reference/590jitter/index.html Sponsor: Convert DVD to MP4, MP3 and more digital formats for playing on any devices: bit.ly/3muinkB 47X faster | 1:1 quality ratio | 80% smaller

@zulumax1

5 жыл бұрын

That article is 30 years old, but it has a lot of good information to it. I did not know that the phase of the return light beam caused reduction in output for instance. Recorded CD's that we make on out home CD burners work different by the recording laser turning the CDR darker. I don't think this works the same as pits and lands in commercially produced CD's. That may explain why burned CD's won't play in some players. Need to read more on that topic. Prism breaks up reflected return beam into several images so a servo motor can focus and track the spiral of data that tracks from inner to outside. Modern CD players and DAC's have come a long way in 30 years and have adapted, improved or overcome some of the problems.

@maartenc6099

5 жыл бұрын

According to an article by Martin Colloms in the April 1990 issue of Hi-Fi News, the green paint selectively absorbs the infra-red laser light that is reflecting around the disc interior,

@akaFrits1

5 жыл бұрын

@@maartenc6099 Even if that would be the case, it has no significance for the ability of the cd-player to read the digital info correctly. Cd-roms work in the same way. Ever heard of cd-rom tweaks that make better games, Word-documents (better blacks!), or whatever content is present on the disc? The only reason these tweaks are sold to hifi lovers is the pure suggestion that they work. And suggestion is a powerfull thing.

@Wordsalad69420

3 жыл бұрын

Paul McGowan is super knowledgeable and I own his company's products. But that doesn't mean he is always right. A lot of these ideas are simply snake oil. In theory they may make sense (good luck proving them though). But in practice you won't find a person on the planet who will be able to tell the difference. So then tell me, besides satisfying your OCD, what is the point in doing anything besides maybe #1?

@anadialog

3 жыл бұрын

Paul is just the tip of the iceberg. Continue reading the post. And BTW several people in the comments are backing up these tweeks. So we are already way beyond a single person on the planet. ;-)

What matters more than ANYTHING is that the CD is well mastered. Garbage in = garbage out. Often times it is worth it to research different CD editions before purchase. Many people will simply buy whatever Amazon has in stock new which means the chance of getting an overcompressed remaster is very high. Many new albums are poorly recorded and poorly mastered and there is really nothing that can be done about those.

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

Very very very true!! Especially the Amazon part!

@MacXpert74

5 жыл бұрын

Totally agree. Mastering is key for good sound quality.

@davidcartmill5960

5 жыл бұрын

dietchap

@geraldperry7779

4 жыл бұрын

Still using my 1989 Yamaha CD player weighs 28 lbs, has built into volume control you can plug a 2 channel power amp directly into it. I don't think they ever made CD player better. Going purchase the cleaning kit,after 30 years am sure laser lens is dirty.

@paultreneary

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah, vinyl didn't escape the brickwalling/loudness wars either.

A few points. 1: The quality of digital cables doesn't matter, as long as the cable works at all. Even the cheapest, crappiest cables work flawlessly. VWestlife did a great demonstration of this. 2: Error correction. Yes, there are a lot of errors when reading the pits and lands, and that is exactly why the CD standard is built with error correction, which can correct those errors losslessly. When the error is too large to correct, the music will skip. 3: Cleaning the lens. Those discs are useful if your CD player is not reading the discs, or if it is skipping. As for the "special" lens cleaner disc, any lens cleaning disc will work. It is just a soft brush that wipes off dust from the lens. 4: Dirty disc. Cleaning the disc with a cloth, and soapy water does just fine, but try not to get water on the edges of the disc. Besides, all that error correction means that you need a very dirty disc for it to matter. A real tip: Find a better master.

@anadialog

2 жыл бұрын

Hi there, Point n.1 don't rely on you tubers for the truth, me included. Check this video I made and most importantly the scientific papers I included in the video description. I was skeptical as well but there is proof of otherwise: kzread.info/dash/bejne/lWamm7eYeJOqZ8o.html Point n. 2 it is much, much, much more complex than that. Again, check the documentation I added in the video description of this video. Interpolation for example, always there and working recreating and altering the sound. Skipping is the last thing to take into consideration.

Re the cleaning disc: they are supplied with a special jewel case that has a specialy shaped centre clip which holds the disc a couple of mm away from the tray to protect the brush. Never put the disc in a regular case or, even worse, a slimline case as they could well damage those fine fibres.

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

True!

Psychologically these little tricks all work well !

I was a teenager of 90s CD era so obviously agree to all mentioned tricks and hacks, few more: - While buying CDs don't buy copies as they use inferior quality disks to write. - That solution used in auric illuminator is same as spectacle glasses cleaner, its a volatile cleaner with a little amount of optical brightening agent, so any good quality glasses cleaner is sufficient.

I see a red cd and I want to paint it black 🎶

Money better spent on more music. Time better spent listening to more music

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

Can't object that...music always comes first! ;-)

Still have my 1989 Yamaha CD player paid $2400. Back then,it weight 28lbs I plug my Bryston 4B directly into her,bypassing the pre-amp. I would say mine needs a good cleaning after 30 year's,can't wait get that kit for before and after results.Great video going subscribe.

The origin of the whole blackening a CD enhances sound myth was actually an article from a German audio magazine which they published as a joke in their April fools day issue.

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

Just stumbled upon this. Maybe can help to dissipate prejudice: www.stereophile.com/reference/590jitter/index.html

@OM19_MO79

5 жыл бұрын

@@anadialog Jitter is normal and the laser mechanism and the subcode, along with other hardware enchancements and improvements, are there to solve the problem. Painting your CD like an idiot does nothing.

@OM19_MO79

5 жыл бұрын

@@SpoonFruit That's stupid. The noise floor, which is also the resolution, is fixed at 16-bit. This resolution cannot be improved by painting the CD, it will have to be either in the mastering or in the amp side, never on the media. If the laser is unable to read the disc properly, noises and clicks will be heard, but even in that situation, believe it or not, the resolution is still 16-bit.

@JeanKatana

5 жыл бұрын

Any source of your claim?

@barski1960thomas

5 жыл бұрын

Audiophiles are very gullible. LOL!!

Everyone should check this out, in the early 80s I Purchased my first CD player. In every publication that I read they prescribed this technique. I remember reading this in Stereo review. I traded it and Low and behold it worked! My first evaluation was that since I Expecting to hear something I did. Five friends sit on the couch and I play Darkside of the moon. From the first note everyone said yes I definitely hear a difference Also pointing out that the LED indicator’s had dramatically switched. (Try it - you’ll like it - Mikey, He likes it, he likes it) Can’t wait to Hear a difference if any from the anniversary cd’s of Abbey Road,The White album,Sergeant peppers, Ram. Yes I’m a big Beatles fan.

I think if your CD is free of scratches and dust you should be fine, there should be no errors when playing, sound quality is always constant since it's a digital source, played back digitally.

@robfriedrich2822

2 жыл бұрын

I think the point is, how errors will be corrected. There's a point, where the correction affects the content and that's let it sound sterile and static.

@estusflask982

2 жыл бұрын

@@robfriedrich2822 If the disc isn't scratched, there are no errors.

@CyrilleBoucanogh

2 жыл бұрын

@@estusflask982 have you personally proved that by doing lots of research and tests? Or you just think that?

@weeethesheeple1754

Жыл бұрын

@@robfriedrich2822 Error correction is introduced into the system so there are no errors. Hence error correction. You hear music, no error. You hear crackles, dropouts, error not corrected. Nothing in between that.

@theevilwitchtheband

Жыл бұрын

@@weeethesheeple1754 you're right, reed solomon error correction ensures that every bit out remains the same on every playback... unless the disc is damaged phisically beyond error correction boundaries these "enhancements" fall into the boundaries of magic and snake oil...

I use Windex and a lint free cloth (old sock or tshirt) on my cds and dvds. Works great for cleaning.

I use Holy water to clean my CD's and my God does it make them sound the same.

Regarding the painting of the disk, as i understand the phenomenon, the light from the laser reflects inside the disk, spreading to the edges then reflect back when hitting the edges. The returned light might in some cases disturb the main light beam, producing some errors in reading some bits. Those bits will be obviously corrected by the error correction circuit, replacing the missing bits with the adiacent bits, giving a not so good sound, depending on the amount of bits being replaced. Now, i can speculate that this issue is more prevalent when the laser is weak, when the disk is burned in a computer (less contrast) or with double layer discs (SACD). It can be one of those causes or all of them combined

@alexandermikhailov2481

21 күн бұрын

This myth was debunked a lot of times but the snake oil consumers must have a steady supply of snake oil.

Right on Muchacho. The black on the cd edge plus the cleaning gave a much better sound. Thanks for your earnest good advice.

I suggest using black tourmaline and shungite pyramids near the audio gear. It immensely enhances the audio experience. Due to continuous misbelief due to lack of experience please connect with a local shaman or wizard and infuse a pyramid with magic and intent and try it yourself. If you after all this still don’t hear difference, trust me there is a very big difference.

@amnonhoppe

Жыл бұрын

This is probably why Pink Floyd put a pyramid on the Dark side of the moon CD 😂

Thanks for sharing! Very useful. Amazing channel🙌

Agreed,I do and have them all,it's a small improvement but cheap so overall I'm happy.

Thank you will try your ideas on my system ... Really intrigued by your patience in covering all bases on how to improve the enjoyment of the listening experience thank you

Three things in order of increasing cost I suggest #1 the Sound Improvement Disc is a thin green plastic mat that sits atop the CD . It works , but I can't say why , #2 take the player's digital out to a better quality D/A converter ( this could be more or less than the next) #3 the largest improvement and expensive is the Audio Desk Systeme CD lathe which makes the disc perimeter perfectly concentric with the center hole . This allows a better read of the disc and less electrical noise from the tracking and focus motors . This works at all price point transports/players . I've had others review these improvements in A/B/A testing and these are not wishful thinking . #1 is within anyone's budget . There are 2 models for top load or tray . Not for gamers .

ESTOY COMO LOCO REALIZANDO LO QUE APRENDI DE TUS CONEJOS MUCHAS GRACIAS MI AMIGO

i am an Audio-frick, and always love this your comment's editions...

Snake oil. How to actually enjoy good digital: 1. Get a good DAC with sound you like 2. Get good speakers with sound you like 3. Research which masters are fine and buy those versions 4 If you bought a CD, rip it losslessly to FLAC 5. Play it with a bitperfect player such as Audirvana and send the bits directly to your DAC, which will convert it back to analog and sends the sound to your speakers

@kahuna1247

2 жыл бұрын

Amen!

I just bought an Onkyo 7030. For 200 bucks...what a deal! It's got one helluva DAC system built into it. You will not believe how good this CD player sounds...And the build quality is awesome. Look it up and read the reviews...Stunning Fidelity from a Stylish and Affordable CD Player For music lovers who enjoy the tangible experience of playing a physical format, the CD retains its enduring appeal. The pleasure comes not just from browsing a collection of discs and reading the liner notes. It also comes from enjoying your music in superior fidelity. By combining high-quality components and decades of Onkyo audio know-how, the C-7030 CD player delivers a superb playback experience. The key lies in keeping the audio signal clean and free from interference, all the way to the output stage. To achieve this, we employ a new high-precision clock to dramatically reduce timing errors, along with our original VLSC™ to reduce pulse noise. Driving the system is a massive, custom-built transformer that provides a clean and stable power supply. Given how affordable the C-7030 is, build quality is exceptional. A 1.6 mmthick flat chassis base helps reduce unwanted vibrations, while the sleek aluminum front panel provides an elegant finish. FEATURES • Plays Audio CD, CD-R, CD-RW, and MP3 CD* • VLSC™ (Vector Linear Shaping Circuitry) for Pulse Noise Reduction • Custom-Designed Massive EI Transformers • Precision Clock (±10 ppm) • High Quality 192 kHz/24-Bit D/A Converter • Differential Headphone Amplifier Circuitry • 25-Track Memory Playback • Random and Repeat Playback Function • 2 Digital Audio Outputs (Optical and Coaxial) • Analog Audio Output • 1.6 mm-Thick Anti-Vibration Full-Flat Chassis • Solid Aluminum Front Panel • 3-Mode Display Dimmer (Normal/Dim/Dimmer) • Auto Standby Function • RI (Remote Interactive) Remote Control

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

Great find!

@AmericanConstellation

5 жыл бұрын

@var1328 IT's great CD player! Who are you? Charley Tuna?

@LorenzoNW

3 жыл бұрын

@@AmericanConstellation It's nowhere remotely close to great. I owned a flagship Onkyo CD player many years ago. I think it was around $800. It was good but I wouldn't want to listen to it today after owning a Cary 303/300 CD player with NOS tubes. But that's neither here nor there. $200 is a good price and if you own a system that's commensurate in quality with your Onkyo 7030 and enjoy the way it sounds, that's all that matters.

Thanks for taking the time to post your tips.Just ignore the skeptics (they post on mcGowan's videos as well). Apparently if reality/experience disagrees with preconceived notions, than experience/reality is wrong.

@anadialog

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks Scott!

There is ANOTHER benefit to a Stat Mat: Especially if you are using CDR Discs, These Discs have a MUCH THINNER reading Surface, which MAY cause an albeit slight scattering of the Beam-in other words some of the laser energy could go through this TRANSLUCENT Surface thereby SCATTERING the beam. A Stat Mat completely eliminates this from happening. You may may not get a slightly better Sound quality; But it won't hurt, LOL!

1. no discussion 2. makes sense but only for speaker because they vibrate to make sound and they can transfer those vibrations to floor in a not so desired manner. Keeping anything on speakers is also no-no for the same reason. 3. You have the signal from CD or you don't have. You also have some skipping correction, control sums and additional data to correct interruptions. If the lens is dirty you simply can't get any sound. Music on a CD is stored as digital data. (also applies to 2.) I've never had problems with a readout even from old CD-player (computer CD). You may need to clear an open-top CD players, but a simple lens cleaner is enough. 4. sneak oil/audio voo-doo 5. sneak oil/audio voo-doo, but at least doesn't cost much

@geraldperry7779

4 жыл бұрын

My 1989 Yamaha CD player still going strong after 30 years, sounds better than my oppo 203. May just be best CD player ever made.

@sergiobisonte

Жыл бұрын

vibration on digital data is BS!! if you copy a file to an usb pen in heaven or if you copy it in hiroshima on 1945, it will be the same data...

very interesting, so much to learn

Tip #1: simple, good interlinks are all you need. The only thing an interlink does, is to transfer a low voltage a/c current from your cd-player to your amplifier. Nothing difficult, no need for expensive ones. Ever seen the inside of a cd-player? No gold connections, forged by elves at full moon, in there. Tip #2. Some basics of digital encoding of audio: there are two choices. The first is: you get the original digital code into the DAC, or the digital code is corrected to perfection before it enters your DAC. Original without errors or corrected without errors: the code is exactly the same. The second is: the reading is flawed so heavily that the error correction can't reproduce the original 16-bit word anymore. That is immediately audible: cracking sound, stutters etc. appear. So, ether you have a perfect signal or a clearly audible distorted signal. There is really nothing inbetween. So adding clamps, vibration reduction etc. is useless unless you live in a very shaky environment. Tip #3. Lens cleaning is only necessary if your cd's are getting badly read by the cd-player, with stutters, skipped tracks etc. See tip #2. Tip #4. Problems with static electricity. WHAT? Cd's are read by an OPTICAL system. You know: light, bouncing back from a reflective surface. In no way statistic electricity can influence that process. Indeed: snake oil. Try a really blind test: you will not hear any difference. Promise. Same goes to 'demagnitisation of cd's'. It works. By suggestion only. Tip #5. The illuminator. I couldn't stop laughing. Really? Hey, your cd has info like 001100101011000 in trains of 16 bits. Your cd player reads those and feeds them into the DAC which transfers it to an analog waveform. The reading is usually 100% perfect, or the error correction makes it 100% perfect again (see tip #2). The illuminator shouldn't (and won't) make any difference to that signal. If it does, the reading gets faulty. Simple as that. My tips for better audio quality: Tip A: look into the acoustics of the listening room. Avoid too many hard surfaces. Tip B: vary the placement of your speakers in relation to your listening position (free!) Tip C: close your eyes while listening (free!) Tip D: After you have gotten the maximum out of tips A and B and you still want to spend money: try better speakers and test them at home before buying them.

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

Since you put so much effort in writing this I think it is correct to reply. Please forget about this common snake oil opinions try things for yourself. The auric illuminator does make a change. It is amazing. For the digital preconception, there is so much ignorance out there its unbearable. It is not just 1s and 0s. Start from here your reassessment: www.stereophile.com/reference/590jitter/index.html In the end I just don't care because my heart is with analog but there are ways to make digital better. And it is right to inform people. If things don't convince me I leave them aside. Most of these don't have a strong effect, I agree. But for example the auric does make a difference. Try and then tell us your impressions. Don't deliver preconceptions. That is not helping anyone. We want direct experience. Anyways, thanks for sharing your point of view.

@akaFrits1

5 жыл бұрын

@@anadialog I've read the Audiophile article. It concludes: 'From my measurements, it is apparent that none of these CD tweaks have any effect on a player's error-correction ability or on the amount of jitter in the HF signal. However, it is beyond doubt that they increase the musicality of CDs.' In no way the article sheds any light upon how he came to that conclusion. If there is any double-blind test that confirms the added musicality, I'm willing to give it some credit. Otherwise it can just be suggestion, which is a powerfull psychologic effect.

@richardm.9821

4 жыл бұрын

@@anadialog What becomes the audio signal IS just 1's and 0's!! You CANNOT refute that. Along with other metatdata information that has nothing to do with the sound. www.snopes.com/fact-check/bewaring-of-the-green/

@OMNIDROID2995

2 жыл бұрын

@@anadialog Placebos work frighteningly well. My ceiling light shines much brighter with "Auric illuminator" on the light switch and also distributes the light better😆 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital

I have a CD lens cleaning disc (memorex), and it does work!

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

Good to know! Thanks!

I was told while putting anything near the reading surface of a disc, always go from centre to perimeter square to the data stream, so as to not create any damage that can send wayward laser light off on angles, and if deep enough can cut the flow of data, creating a jump. If dusty or printed, I use iso pads to wipe in this way and it does the same thing. Of course, having speakers set up to the best height and distance from the ears (and wall) helps, as does keeping the ears still to get a consistent aural input lol

I had a very scratched CD once, it was skipping. I used an orbital sander to buff the scratches away and the disc started playing like new. Orbital sander works 💪

If CDs required light filtering from the circumference ( something I very much doubt by the way.... since the CD is well inside the transport where it is very dark anyway) wouldn't you think the CD manufacturers would print a black border on the disc? I remember similar 'snake oil' ideas using a special green texta marker that tricked you into believing the sonic quality would greatly improve! The only recommendation I can recommend here is use top quality cables and place the CD player on a hard surface that doesn't vibrate

I heard it ,thought it was bs but I'm blown away

I personally doubt any disc treatment would have any noticeable influence on the sound quality, unless the disc is very dirty and there where audible problems with reading it. But if you'd want to more scientifically analyze it, you could rip a track from a CD before and after the disc treatments and then do a bit comparison between the files. If there is no difference, then you can't hear a difference in the audio. It would be pure placebo.

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

Ok I will do that! Gees...it is tough to convince you guys. As I said in the video, you really hear the difference on person. Not with rips. But something should come across...

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

Hi there, nope! It isn't. Maybe in theory but then noise kicks in on various levels...never going to have a perfect copy through a rip starting from the mistakes introduced by the player, the burner etc. Don't trust me or the comments here...go and ask s REAL electronic engineer...not sound engineer...so many things can go wrong from the digital recording all the way to CD playback it's not even funny...

@richardm.9821

4 жыл бұрын

@@anadialog No, YOU really hear the difference, not me, because that's what YOU believe that you hear. Placebo effect is real, and very strong.

@geraldperry7779

4 жыл бұрын

@@anadialog going try it on my 1989 Yamaha CD player, never cleansed the laser lens,a before and after trail I'll do.where did you get the kit,can't find it Canada. They'll never going build a CD player that good!

@anadialog

4 жыл бұрын

@@geraldperry7779 great! As I said don't expect night and day difference. I just got the Nagaoka CD online several years ago. I hope it's still in production...you should try the Auric Auric illuminator as well! www.nagaoka.eu/index.php?action=article&aid=25&lang=EN

Good tips. I found clean interconnects make a big difference I brought a small ultra sonic cleaner and had a few CDs that would not play. Clean repeat until the CD plays perfectly.

hello analog after i saw this video About Auric Illuminator ,first i thought this is fake, but you explained it so greatly,i order it and give it a try, and i could not believe it,YES IT WORKS,..i got a lot cds from the 80s ,and is noticeably improved. For example, I heard the pelvis of the drums on a song that was not there before the CD was cleaned,thankyou this is a great audio tweak

@anadialog

3 жыл бұрын

Thank YOU for this feedback! People don't believe it (understandably) but it does work!

If you could see your CD surface through a microscope, you would see it has peaks, and valleys (roughness). Think of very fine 4000 grit sandpaper. It too feels smooth to the touch, but obviously is not. The light from the laser, which is very bright, will be scattered due to all the peaks and valleys (roughness on the surface) on the disc. The reason the treatment works is because the liquid that gets rubbed onto the face of the CD is basically a wax, not much different than the wax for your car's paint. This makes the disc surface much smoother, so the light no longer scatters. Therefore, the error correction circuit does not need to make as many corrections. That is how someone described it to me. Blackening the edges keeps the light from the laser from exiting the edge of the disc and then bouncing around inside the playing area. Again, it results in less errors needing correction.

@anadialog

Жыл бұрын

Interesting, thanks for explaining that!

For method 5, the explanation is : laser bounces around INSIDE the transparent material of the disc and takes a lot of rounds of bounces before being attenuated, i.e. dying away. The "old light" will jam into the "new light" being read so the read head is reading extra rubbish/second hand old light. There is limited imperfect error correction scheme in the playback hardware that never does the job however much money you pay. I think, unlike the CD-ROM for computer data, it was not DESIGNED to be be error free considering the early age the standard was created, when microprocessor power was not easy to come by. The error correction scheme has a lot to deal with. The CD stamping process may introduce further errors as well. So the "wisest" thing to do (at that time) was to design it to "slur over" the errors rather than trying to correct it in real time. Remember the CD was invented before we had DISCMAN that reads ahead many many seconds so that you can do jogging with it? The old standard reads and processes the disc in real time (or just in time without much margin). With the blackening the bouncing around of light is stopped earlier before the light is eventually attenuated. Some people shave the edge of the disc to a knife edge for a similar effect. Many Philips/Decca CDs has a roughened/painted edge. Some playstation discs are complete black (including the main surface) and so are some "audiophile version CDs" So this optical trick deals with the way laser bounces around (refraction?) inside the transparent substance and doing the track prevents optical mix-ups that cannot be corrected by the electronics given how they were designed. I have never tried this on DVD and blur ray because they sound good enough and on the back of my mind they could have been designed for 100% error-free read given the abundance of processing power when such standards were created (more recently). It should be remembered that there were fierce debates about what colour of ink to use. Of course Black is the nobrainer. Any permanent marker does the job. No need for specific brands. It is just an optical issue. Look at early documentary of laser (as an invention), you can clearly see how light bounces around within clear materials. Just basic physics, no expensive products please.

@exMuteKid

Жыл бұрын

You're right about the light behavior in transparent materials but this does not apply in any way to the quality of playback from a CD or DVD. the information is read digitally, so it doesn't matter how distorted the laser is as long as the photosensor can differentiate a 1 from a 0. (This is why expensive shielded HDMI cables won't give better image quality) I hate pseudoscience

Have you ever used "LAST" vinyl record preservative? It's still being sold today, I picked mine up in the mid-1980s. It suppose to really help eliminate vinyl LP wear when playing an LP as the needle makes contact with the Vinyl. It's suppose to change the physical properties of the vinyl making it much more resistant to wear and tear to the LP. I'd love to hear your opinion of this Vinyl preservative, thanks.

The.Single. most dramatic and effective improvement that I've ever experienced in audio was to change my ANALOG interconnects and speaker cables (note: NOT HDMI, which are digital), to using AudioQuest cables (No, I don't work for AudioQuest). The difference was as if I had been looking through the most dirty window in the world, and then someone had cleaned that window and suddenly I was seeing (hearing) things that I had never seen before. And not just nuances in that sound, but actual WHOLE sounds I had not heard before on an album I had been listening to my whole life (Jethro Tull's 'Songs From the Wood').

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

I am glad ti hear this...if you check the comments of my cable videos you will notice that I have been crucified for saying this same claim. Now again, with the same attitude, others are claiming that digital is only 10101, forgetting about the issues tued to a spinning physical medium as the CD. By the way, I did notice diffetences in the videoa quality with a goid HDMI but no differences with a high quality USB cable. In that case, it is really a simple 1010101 data transfer.

@dreamingmusic3299

5 жыл бұрын

Oh, I know. LOL I'm old and have been around long enough to experience all sorts of animus from people about this topic. And most of them have never even tried the experiment themselves. They just automatically assumed that they knew that there couldn't possible be any improvement. And the sad things is that they get angry when you challenge their assumptions.

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

Exactly!!

@akaFrits1

5 жыл бұрын

Just a question: did you conclude it after a well executed blind test, to exclude any kind of suggestion? Btw, cables aren't analog or digital. The signal is. If a cable is advertised as 'digital', you can smell the snake-oil.

@asadabbasmirza9519

Жыл бұрын

Your mind or brain must be a sharp register of remembering nuances.The it takes to replace the interconnect or cables , can u remember the first one .?????????

Another tip - put a heavy book on top of CD player it helps reduce resonance/vibrations.

Data from the CD is stored in a buffer and vibration from sound should not be an issue. Remember the portable CD players with anti skip technology? They had a larger memory buffer that would store several seconds of data, so the CD would have time to recover the lost data. Microphonics is a real phenomenon with electronics like circuit boards and cables however. Tube amps can really be microphonic, just tap on a preamp tube with a pencil eraser. The thing in the 80's with the marking pen was a green pen to absorb the red light straying out of the CD. Black makes sense since lasers are infrared, purple, and blue now, also multi-layered. Has anyone done tests to see if this makes a difference? Where are the myth busters!

@shrike9t1

5 жыл бұрын

zulumax1 all optic Disc Systems have an error correction when its not a clear digital 0 or 1, it decide which could be . Scratches , dust and Vibration Are reasons for a higher Amount of corrections, and this is Audible, because the Information is zehn „guessed“

@richardm.9821

4 жыл бұрын

Green pen myth busted: www.snopes.com/fact-check/bewaring-of-the-green/

I really don't understand why people think CDs have a cold sound. What the hell does that even mean? I have a decent DAC and my CDd sound amazing.

@anadialog

3 жыл бұрын

Do you have also a decent vinyl or tape setup?

@Wordsalad69420

3 жыл бұрын

@@anadialog I used to have a really good vinyl setup. While it sounded different, I didn't get what the hype was all about, so I sold it all and stuck to CDs. I now use a Woo Audio headphone amp hooked directly into my Denon CD player and Sennheiser 660s and the sound is simply amazing. I get the draw to analog, hear the sound that was recorded directly from the master tapes. But it's just not doing it for me to justify the extra cost and inconvenience. Your mileage may vary :)

The black painting thing sounds like a joke indeed. As for wiping CDs, it is always recommended to wipe them radially (in straight lines from the center to the edge), and not in circles. You may accidentally scratch the surface and circular (tangential) scratches may result in reading problems. I know it, cos I have the experience.

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

True, but it comes off much better in small circles! If there are scratching particles, regardless the direction you will scratch the surface I'm afraid...

@inamurato

5 жыл бұрын

I have to disgraee. It's "not regradless of" the direction (axis) of the scratch. If the scratch is somewhat perpendicular to the center (radial; from the center to the periphery) that's normally not a big deal. But if it's somewhat an "arch", which means it's a blemish on the reading path of the laser, that may be an issue. Then the tops and bottoms (1s and 0s) through that scratched path may be misread (or not read at all) by the laser beam. When you unfold the booklets of early CDs (I mean CDs of mid and late 80s), you will find a short instruction on "how to clean your CDs", which do not exist anymore (just like the ADD, AAD, DDD... info which we can't see on today's CDs). By experience again, I would humbly recommend use of a windshield or window cleaning solution to clean your CDs. It works ;) ---> Wipe it radially :)

@inamurato

5 жыл бұрын

Further on... For anything you wanna do on your CDs; first duplicate them on your PC's CD/DVD writer. Then do anything you want on the duplicate CD (which will be a true copy of your original CD, and that's one big thing you cannot do with your LPs!). Some may think I'm a freak, but I always do this with my favourite CDs. When I grab a CD from a store (or receive it from Amazon, etc.) and if I really like the album, I duplicate it on my CD-writer, then I put the original CD on the shelf, and it stays there untouched.

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

Ok!!

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

Ok Murat. Please, use the originals!! Not only yoy are degrading the sound when burining a CD, yes mistakes are constantly introduced (why do you think fir example there are $$$$ burners?) Plus the quality of yhe medium decays drastically after a few months!!

'Alas poor Auric I knew him well'

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

😂

A better clean CD can sound better due to interpolation process used on most players to correct data read errors. I have a question: Are a DVD player good as a CD player? I have a standard DVD player and sounds amazing with my CD'S, but i want to buy a good used CD Player

@anadialog

3 жыл бұрын

It depends from the model...for example I had a DVD player by Pioneer that was very good or my current Oppo, which is a Bluray player...

@emiliorodenasgonzalez8568

2 ай бұрын

My other question is..i want to récord in a CD my récords.. which is the Best option..a CDR..or a DVDR?

I'm confused. What are hearing (or not hearing) in the "before" test that makes it necessary to do these things?

Another great video thanks

for superior sound quality climb to the top of a mountain and fart into a pillow

@anadialog

4 жыл бұрын

Show us your tutorial! ;-)

When your CD enters the transport a large magnet clamps it to the transport. Adding more magnets will not reduce static. The triboelectric effect is caused by potential charge, Magnets can only affect the motion of charged gases such as plasma or electron beams in vacuum. I love good hifi that’s why I am here, amp and speakers spend the money there.

@didioentoro7575

4 ай бұрын

Have you ever tried Marigo Audio CD Mat? Marigo is the only company in the world who doing R&D in CD Mat, and now the tenth generation is coming in this year 2024.

I tuoi video mi piacciono perchè il tuo inglese è sempre assolutamente comprensibile, quasi se parlassi... in italiano!

I've used DNM Reson solid core copper speaker cable and interconnects. Prior to those I tried all kinds of expensive variants. DNM is streets ahead of anything else I've tried. I cannot hear any of my hardware, all I hear is perfectly reproduced music.

When the “pen” solution first appeared I think they recommended/sold green pens, I never heard anything myself nor have I ever heard of anyone who could notice a difference. Still interesting video. A lot of people do rate the mini lathes that clean up the edges.

Do you recommend this treatment for CDs you are going to rip? It seems that would be worthwhile.

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

Sure! Original and copies...

What is the best solution for buying good CD’s edition ? I know you talked in the Dark Side of The Moon video of the new editions who lose the clearness of the first. You talked that each generation of mastering loose 1dB. Perhaps CDJapan ?

@anadialog

3 жыл бұрын

That is a good question. First of all, always check if they made an audiophile edition of that particular album you like. Especially HDCD and XRCD, which I have both treated in dedicated videos. Usually things are done properly. If instead we are talking normal releases, then I believe you must search forums and try to understand what is a good edition. I would tend to leave aside last reissues, like for example the new Phil Collins, and in several cases the very first editions if too early. Middle ground is usually a good choice, stuff reissued during the late 90's and early 2000's and around that.

@endria7152

3 жыл бұрын

@@anadialog Thank you for response. Yes you talked about in the DSD format video. I read a lot last day, especially about loudness war. And I discovered that first editions of The Police got the best dynamic range and equalization. And ... the japaneses 2014 reissues in SHM-CD. The 2003 edition remastered by Bob Ludwig are highly criticized by fans. Very interesting... Your channel is very interesting. Thank you for all the work you put in these videos ;)

Every thing 'can' improve the reproduction. Did you tried the Bedini CD clarifier?

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

No, I haven't...I see its a demagnetizer...

Ah, I have a damping disc somewhere still and had tried that green pen thing back in the day (and like Simon Scneider below I seem to recall there being no proof about the scattered light it absorbed and it even being a joke). It doesn't get anymore logical though than ripping a bit perfect copy to a drive and playing through a DAC - once done it never needs to be repeated. I was going to tweak my CD player with Burr Browns etc but it's now in it's box in the garage.

The Vibrapod is a good solution if you have an entry-level to mid-end system. I have a high-end system and a Star Sound Technologies Sistrum platform with APCD2 Coupling Discs makes a night and day improvement. Tweaks that yield significant improvements in a high-end system include the Bedini Ultra Clarifier HEX- BEAM (not sure it’s still available), IsoTek Full System Enhancer CD (run Track 2 weekly), Furutech destat III, Furutech Flux-50 NCF (expensive but freakin' amazing!), Bybee iQSEs, and Synergistic Orange Fuses. And of course, good power conditioning is critical to high-end audio. Annual maintenance for every mid to high-end system should include deoxidizing and enhancing all electrical contacts with foam tipped swabs (not cotton, which leaves micro-fibers that can damage the electrical connection) and a good contact enhancer like DeoxIT Gold, Furutech Nano Liquid, or Stabilant 22. Some products like Stabilant 22 are only contact enhancers so contacts should first be deoxidized with 99.9% pure isopropyl alcohol and foam swabs. This should be done annually, as oxidation builds up over time and degrades the sound. And yes, the Audience Auric Illuminator is great stuff. I’ve been using it for years.

@anadialog

3 жыл бұрын

Wow! You are really setup. Congrats!

@LorenzoNW

Жыл бұрын

@@a1c3c3u Audience makes high quality Hidden Treasure In-Wall AC Power Cable. Normally a good idea but I live in a condo so no can do. My post is 2 years old. Since then, I’ve upgraded to a Synergistic Master Fuse in my CDP and two Purple Fuses in my integrated amp - obscenely expensive but worth it relative to the improvement gained and the overall cost of my stereo. I also use the Furutech Nano Liquid exclusively now. As with almost all tweaks, YMMV. A few people have complained that the Nano Liquid made their stereo sound too energetic and artificial. My guess is that they had a sterile sounding SS system to begin with and the Nano Liquid exaggerated anyweaknesses in their systems. And I got rid of the Bedini Clarifier. As I improved my system, I was able to hear how it was adding weird artifacts to the sound.

I tested a green paint marker instead of black (green being the "opposite" light spectrum to red) on the 2 of exactly the same cd in the 90s. One had the marker, one didn't. You could definitively hear a difference even in a blind test. Anyone else tried green instead of black?

Hi. I am looking into the possibility of buying a used Unison Research CD player. This one got valves and I would like to hear if you have some recommendations on this player since it is an Italian made product?

@anadialog

3 жыл бұрын

I have never had one of their models but they are highly respected so if the price is right I am sure you will be satisfied.

if the mastering engineer flunked in mastering 101, nothing else matters.

Thanks for advice. But the frequency response is also evident from "normal" levels in the treble area and then goes above 22Khz. I.e. you get some audible improvement all the way. Have a look at Townshend charts for comparison between dome tweeter and their super tweeter. This winter I also listened to this super tweeter in a store in Oslo. And the difference was there. Did I enjoy it ? Not sure if this is what I am after. Like most people say ; go for upgrading of your cd-player or record player. Even better, why don't the producers give us better recordings/pressings? And then there is your listening room....

Actually, pits and valleys are the same thing. You mean pits and lands.

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

Right! I got mixed up. Thanks for correcting that!

The most obvious improvement you can get is to use a CD transport and a DAC! However, your last trick is really amazing; I can hear the difference before and after even on KZread.

@anadialog

Жыл бұрын

Glad you heard that!

I bought a cheap actual CD player and am using it as a transport not a bluray or DVD player the only reason being CD players are meant to sound good so they take more care into the vibration control and power supply and stuff to make sure it sounds as good as it can im on a strict budget so I can't exactly go out and buy a multiple hundred dollar CD player or something but this is just to hold me over I have it plugged into a topping E30 and a cheap amplifier (looking at the denon pma600ne to upgrade this amp was just to get me started) going into the elac debut b6.2 and I love it

Cleaning CDs is unnecessary if you never touch the playing surface and always, always return them to their cases when finished playing them. Laser lense cleaners are not necessary either in my experience. I have several CD players, one manufactured in the 1990's, which play fine and have never had the laser lense cleaned. I would be concerned that the fabric on the spinning cleaner disc is slapping my laser lense at high speed, possibly creating more problems than it solves, scratching it, applying even more dust, maybe slapping it out of alignment. I would just caution anyone not to use those regularly, if at all. Maybe once every five years would be more than sufficient unless you live in an unusually dusty house, in which case you need to be worried about your health more than your CD player. If you purchase a quality CD player, the feet it was built with are superior to any little spikes or rubber footers you might add to it. That is not necessary and in my opinion quite ugly. Just have a solid and heavy rack for your stereo equipment and you'll be fine. Lastly, coloring your CDs with a black permanent marker ruins the appearance, the resale value (which is typically nothing, but some audiophile editions go for several hundred dollars), and it accomplishes nothing. Laser shoot straight at the surface of the disc and read the direct reflection. They don't read stray light. If coloring CDs made any difference, I think at least the audiophile labels like Mobile Fidelity and Analogue Productions would be doing it to their releases. These are my opinions. I'm sure each of you has their own. It's nothing to get angry about. If you think anything odd works for you, then by all means enjoy your music. For me personally, a good disc player, a good amp and preamp, good speakers, and decent cables (costing $ hundreds, not $ thousands, itself crazy to most) is your best bet for good sound for non-millionaires. That, and more importantly, finding the best available editions of your favorite music, if there is even a choice.

@beitie

5 жыл бұрын

Totally agree with you, especially on the lens cleaner part. I had one of those brush type cleaners back in the mid 90's and it totally ruined the lens on my Kenwood player. I've never used a cleaner since, and as long as the CD itself is nice and clean, there are no issues. As you and others have stated, it's all in cleanliness, DAC's, pre amp, amps and speakers.

Pretty clear difference thanks.

Great stuff. Try a heavy slab or tile on top of your cd-player with a anti-vibration mat in-between. Reduces vibration-effects from your speakers woofers.

@LorenzoNW

3 жыл бұрын

I'd recommend using the Vibrapods between the tile and your CDP, especially since tile resonates. A maple board would be better. The Vibrapods will help to drain excess energy from your CDP as well as isolating it. It's a great solution for entry-level to mid-end CDPs. Below your platform, a set of Mapleshade Isoblocks (either from Mapleshade or homemade) is a great way to isolate floor vibration from your CDP. But if you have a high-end system, there's no way around spending a lot of money if you want to get the most out of your components. I own two Star Sound Technologies Sistrum platforms for my integrated amp and CDP and the difference with and without the platforms is night and day. And this is for a headphone system, no floor vibration.

@theklipschcave5593

3 жыл бұрын

@@LorenzoNW Thanks for good advice. I will look into the items. I got a combination of rubber/cork heavy pads under my amp. placed on a stone slab. I didn't know that concrete floor and tiles were prone to resonating problems to such an extent. I have just acquired a Yamaha CDS 2100, moving up from the CDS 1000. So I have to improve the damping.

@LorenzoNW

3 жыл бұрын

@@theklipschcave5593 That's an expensive CDP! Floor vibration usually isn't as much of a problem as draining excess energy from a component itself and isolating it from other components (which is why I opted for individual Original Limited Edition Sistrum platforms - one under my Cary 303/300 CD player and one under my Cary 300SEI amp). They were crazy expensive but I lucked out and found two platforms for sale on Audiogon. Even used, they were a LOT of money but I'm very happy with what they do for the sound. Your best option would be a Sistrum Apprentice Platform. The advantage of the Star points is that a lot of R&D has gone into designing their geometry so that they quickly and efficiently drain excess energy and inhibit energy from going up into your component. And they’ve developed a proprietary copper that doesn’t tarnish. Most of the energy runs down the outside of the points. And most other copper points are just regular copper that tarnishes. So on a microscopic level, it’s like the energy is having to cross over craters, which is very inefficient. And their APCD-5 Coupling Discs absorb more energy than the floor itself! If your components, power conditioning, and cables are already of commensurate quality to your CDP, it’s well worth the money. I’d recommend giving them a call and talking with them about it. They can give you honest and knowledgeable advice. And brand new, the Apprentice is a lot less expensive than the Original Limited Edition platforms were used. I also left a comment below the video about an hour ago listing a number of tweaks that will improve the sound of CDs in a high-end system. Check those out too.

@theklipschcave5593

3 жыл бұрын

@@LorenzoNW Thanks again for the info. I have already sent them a mail. Expect an interesting answer soon. This is a totally new topic for me when it comes to "spikes". I think most products of this kind is of poor quality so you never get any real audible improvements. It's more like; - it can't hurt...Audiogon is the place. They are bit pricy. It's like buying on item every year after saving up...

@theklipschcave5593

3 жыл бұрын

@@LorenzoNW Could't find the list of tweaks for CD's. Please place them again.

I find this Dude's psyche more interesting than the video subject. Believe me, my dear. 16 bit PCM at 44.1 KHz sampling rate, remain 16 bit PCM at 44.1 KHz sampling rate. The only thing in this chain that can influence the sound in the player are the converters and everything behind them. The PCM data stream from the CD drive can reach the converters even with 100 meter long cables without changing anything. With spikes the CD player may look nicer. But that's all. The same applies to cleaning the laser head. If dropouts occur due to dirt, then you need the cleaning CD. The only thing that really makes a difference here is good connections between the source and the amplifier. It doesn't have to cost much, but it should be very well shielded. If the laser reads the entire 0 to max 700MB of PCM data correctly, the precision is quite sufficient. If the precision would not be enough, even a pensioner with a hearing loss would notice the artifacts in the sound. And everything I've written here applies to all digital media. The SACD is the only "theoretical" exception. Since here the Delta Sigma method is used for conversion (1 bit and sampling rate in the MHz range), electromagnetic interference in the digital path "can" influence the sound.

What I do is to polish my cds with normal car wax and then apply some liquid wax to complete the process, that in this case I remove imperfections on the CD and then cover it with a layer of polimers that will help the CD surface to recover its properties and to enhance the light reflection, believe me, it works 😎

Tried out the Illuminator a bit more. Two clear results : SACD CDs should not be treated like it says in the manual. The sound tend to move towards a bit muted. Cleaned the SACD with technical alcohol. All good again. And now the strange thing : Treated normal CD. a few days ago. Like i have stated before, slightly better dynamics and clear detailed sond. After 5 days a played the same CD again. And it was even better. Psychoacoustics is good fun but this was impressive. Tried the day after and it still kept the same higher level og dynamics and forward sound. I thought that the antistatic situation would slowly get worse some time after the first treatment, but so far I got more forward sound after a few days. Anyone with improved sound quality after som use with Auric Illuminator?

Hi. Regarding use of Townshend supertweeter. Users claim thye benefit form a supertweeter regardless of format-use. CD, vinyl, streaming, all formats seems to give a better sound with several users equipment. That implies that a cut off at 22 000 hz. is not a important point with CDs?

@anadialog

4 жыл бұрын

The whole point is to get super tweeters for high-resolution analog and digital material. It's true that most speakers reach 20Khz and that a CD can reach 22Khz, but l wouldn't spend all that money JUST for those 2Khz. If you are listing also di extended frequency material go for it otherwise better spend that on other parts of your system IMHO.

I have noticed that several years after using the Auric Illuminator solution the surface of the disc becomes slightly tacky. I just clean it off with dish soap and then reapply the solution and all is well.

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

Good to know, thanks!

very clever name. i love it

Great tips! Thanks!

Oh the black marker. My dj buddy did this too(30yrs ago).i tried wanted to say there was a difference. But I'm really in the middle on this(also depending on system/recording).also I have cds that are 30+years old.scratched .and on certain players you hear a tic tic. Sound.others you dont.this is my tester cds. if I'm purchasing players. At home i use a denon dns1200 dj player, approx 10yrs old(brings back old memories).at home.it will play anything. have had good luck with denon and Yamaha players. I do know they play scratched discs.

Hi! thank you for the video!!! There are a lot of comments... can anyone tell me what album is played to test with the last method? Thanks in advance!!!

@vicarsanc

4 жыл бұрын

One more thing... Someone could tells me where can I buy auric illuminator? I've searched on internet but I don't find a place to buy from Spain. Thanks!

hablo poco ingles pero a ti te entendi todo muchas gracias mi amigo por ser claro para explicar tus conocimientos

I didnt expect something like this from your channel actually. Sorry for that! I'd like to give you for every single number of your list a thumb up! But theres only one for all possible :) I experienced all these treatments by my own - before I saw your video. I compared different cables, different feet, etc. I always chose the best impacts for the money. Doesnt need to be the most expensive one! Its never actually... Only the point with the electrostatic treatment was actually too expensive for the impact. There was an Idea of a change but (Only in my case!) not worth the money. I tryed the Furutech RD-1 once. Honestly I dont exactly know if it does the same. But at least a related treatment I guess. The ability of developing the hearing or listening capability is different from person to person. And also the Audio Gear is always different. So I beleave with much more experienced ears and higher equipment there will come a point of break even though. Great Video! Thank you for talking about everything possible! Quite courageous! .

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

Thank you Jean! In fact I am getting a lot of hate for this vid...I never claimed night xnd day change but fir example the auri illuminator does have a positive effect, I am 100% sure!

Nice video as always : 👍👍👍👍👍👍

Thanks! I managed to find a used Pioneer Elite Series reference disc changer at a second-hand store. It had some problems starting out, like the tray wouldn't stay out. I managed to fix that, but now I can't get it to stop randomly rejecting discs. Sometimes it accepts them, sometimes not. As soon as I get that issue sorted, I'll have to start trying these tips!

@anadialog

2 жыл бұрын

Nice! The Auric is the real changer!

@anadialog

2 жыл бұрын

Nice! The Auric is the real changer!

@anadialog

2 жыл бұрын

Nice! The Auric is the real changer!

@anadialog

2 жыл бұрын

Nice! The Auric is the real changer!

Not going to look it up to confirm, but I seem to recall that the black on Playstation disks was an antipiracy measure.

@MistaFussichannel

3 жыл бұрын

It wasn’t. It was a marketing thing. The anti piracy came from the fact that the pits that it looked for to verify the discs were not standard. They had a wobble in them that was hard to replicate by CD burners. They got around this by bypassing the chip.

My moon 260 CD Player has pretty decent feet, but I also added some inexpensive DiversiTech E.V.A. Anti-vibration pads Have you tried Audioenvy cables? They would make instant cables for review, at only 200 bucks a piece

@anadialog

Жыл бұрын

I haven't!

Auralix damping mats for amps and speakers reduce vibrations and help you decouple the gear from the floor or rack.

I need more reassurance before blacking up my cds. Does this really work? Wouldn't all cds already be blacked up if it did work?

@anadialog

Жыл бұрын

It helps. The important is the auric illuminator. That is a clear jump in quality

After the importance of the static electricity removal for CDs, you should mention the neutrino shield, it has the same impact on CD quality. 😂

How do you define “good”? Expensive? Newer? More bells and whistles?

I remember green pen on edges of disc. It worked!

Thanks Guido. Have you come across the carbon fiber CD tuning mat?

@anadialog

9 ай бұрын

I haven’t but should be in the same range of effects

I understand. But the extra cost for each CD would be minimal. And since the CDs are not the flavor of the day in these vinyl-times I thought there would be a need to improve the media all around?

I found that upgrading amp, player and speakers combined with an acoustic room treatment works the best. 😉

Very interesting.. I've never heard of this bfr.. thanx for the tip.. so.. how about if I apply the same blknd process on Audio-DvD's & Bluray-Audio.. DvD-Audio.. Super-Audio-CD's alike..?? Thanx for the audiophile tips.. 👍😎👆

@anadialog

4 жыл бұрын

Sure, but the key element is the Auric Illuminator compound...revealing!

Why do you need a matt? Just use the top weight provided by the manufacturer.

I came here to inform myself but reading the comments around here, seems to be another controversial topic. I honestly never though of adding something on top of the cd to stabilise it, maybe we are all skeptical because we have not been educated from the start to do it. It’s all plug and play… right? Anyways, I have been looking at some HiFi gear from the past, particularly the Sony SCD-1 and that player comes with a metal piece that you put on top of the cd for stability. I think the SCD-777ES does it also, but the SCD-555ES doesn’t (it’s a tray mechanism). I’m also not sure why most are skeptical about it, people have been adding weights on vinyl for ages for the same purpose. I don’t use any but I’d be curious to experiment and then make my own conclusions - just like anything it may also be subjective the gear each of us has at home, I don’t know if a cheap CD player will make any difference with or without, the components are just not at that detail level.

@anadialog

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for your lucid analysis. The only one that really makes a bug difference is the Auric, the rest so-so.

Most of the tips has something to do to avoid errors, so the error correction won't affect the sound.

Skepticism is one of the most important qualities in a curious human. I'm open to the idea that vibrations cause noise but I'd like to know at what point it actually becomes audible. We have a reasonable idea of what this is for total harmonic distortion and wow/flutter, for example. Because what I hear from presentations like this is, if I am playing a song for you and I have the CD player in the other room, you should be able to tell me whenever I bump it lightly with my finger (let's say I do it continuously for 10 seconds at a time). It just seems unrealistic.

I use a drop or two of some dish detergent in warm water, in a small basin with a chamois cloth rubbing from inside to out in a straight line! Certainly to clean fingerprints (if you were stupid enough to put them on your disc in the first place) and sometimes for the odd shallow scratch ( a used disc maybe) and it works just as well for $1.78 (for the rest of your life)! I am dead serious, I own about 3000 CD's and you do need to clean them every so often (say every couple of years depending on usage), however,...I'm not so sure about the lens brush disc thing! Every time I've used one I've heard no difference and in fact one time after doing so a relatively expensive unit that I had stopped playing my discs altogether! As far as static control, I used to use a Furutech static remover which is also a circular type device that you put your disc on and let both sides demagnetize!I never thought this device did anything other than make the potential for putting marks on my discs greater!Ciao y'all!

@anadialog

5 жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing your experience. I am pretty sure that most of these solutions bring minor of not any benefits although it does depend also grom your system. The auric illuminator isbthe only solution I do fully sustain...

Definitely gonna try these as but I'm going to replace the interconnects with a digital cable optical/coax