How IMPORTANT is BALANCE in Poker? | How to WIN $3,000,000 in 3 Days Part 4

Ойындар

This hand is against Michael Addamo and we try to get some revenge for him busting us in this event the year prior. Another new video coming Thursday!
0:00 Introduction
1:15 Solver Inputs
1:50 Outliers in Poker
3:00 How important is Balance?
3:40 Tournament Results
4:30 Preflop
6:18 Flop
6:55 Monotone Board
8:20 Raising the Flop
11:50 Balancing Flop Raises
13:04 Denying Equity and Conclusion
The 2023 Super High Roller Bowl was a $300,000 Buy-In event featuring all the killers including Jason Koon, Alex Foxen, Justin Bonomo, Stephen Chidwick, LuckyChewy, Michael Addamo, Isaac Haxton, Nick Petrangelo and more! Stay tuned to the channel for more hands from this "How to Win $3,000,000 in 3 days" series, new videos twice a week!
Catch all the Super High Roll Bowl episodes at PokerGO and use promo code DANIEL2023 to get $20 an annual subscription: bit.ly/DANIEL2022
Take the Free Hybrid Poker IQ Test here: iqtest.hybridpoker.com/daniel
Check out my MasterClass: www.masterclass.com/classes/d...
Use PROMO CODE KIDPOKER20 to get 20% off at contendersclothing.com/?rfsn=...
Check out my DAT Poker Podcast at podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast​... and subscribe on iTunes.
Follow Me, Daniel Negreanu, Online Here:
linktr.ee/dnegspoker​
/ realkidpoker
/ dnegspoker
/ dnegspoker

Пікірлер: 181

  • @nicolaizubi2928
    @nicolaizubi2928 Жыл бұрын

    This is why Dneg's the best. He always evolves and appreciates the different ways of playing rather than sticking to one strategy and hating on the unconventional players for exploiting him.

  • @JeffZuccMusk

    @JeffZuccMusk

    Жыл бұрын

    Dnegs is the best because he also crushes mixed games

  • @Dynamic0NE

    @Dynamic0NE

    Жыл бұрын

    He says that then plays like a noob always

  • @dnegspoker

    @dnegspoker

    Жыл бұрын

    Always gotta try and stay one step ahead of em'

  • @Dynamic0NE

    @Dynamic0NE

    Жыл бұрын

    @@dnegspoker homie you're amazing at poker and the results and longevity speak for itself but do you see how you used to play when you were beasting 15 or 20 years ago? Or how all the best players in the world like Foxen and others play? You give away too much information Dan. Your KZread channel already gives people a huge advantage on you breaking down how you play. But engaging in talk at the table and showing your cards to people does way more damage then you know. You need to be a silent assassin on the table and thats pretty much the only way you give away little to no information. This is no knock on you and what youve done or will accomplish in the future even.

  • @david_cop_a_feel7538

    @david_cop_a_feel7538

    Жыл бұрын

    @@dnegspoker - If a player checks out of turn, then check-raises you all-in, is that an angle? Asking for PokerFaceAsh.

  • @Charlie_Ses
    @Charlie_Ses Жыл бұрын

    This little series so far has been excellent. Daniel setting out how his thinking has evolved since he mastered solvers during the Heads Up challenge against Polk. Interesting that the ones that do best in any era are the ones that go against current accepted wisdom a little...

  • @bishop198666

    @bishop198666

    Жыл бұрын

    its almost like they write a book to tell you how to play, then they can easily exploit you, because they know what the "book" says. lmao

  • @raldrich5093

    @raldrich5093

    Жыл бұрын

    💯 agree

  • @SkeeNnN

    @SkeeNnN

    Жыл бұрын

    If this video was 2 years old I would agree that this goes against the conventional wisdom, but these days it's pretty well known that trying to replicate a solver is far from optimal for the vast majority of people and defiantly not an idea Daniel invented. Only shit-regs and absolute geniuses who somehow have memorized all the frequencies try to replicate the solver. Everyone else has realized that exploitative play is far superior to using simplified versions of GTO as you will simply have too many leaks in your game if you are up against competent opponents and at best break even/ barely win against other mediocre GTO wannabes. As more people realize this, I really hope that online poker in a couple of years will return to its roots of being a leveling war where people are trying to exploit each other with unique approaches instead of exploits just being more or less standard deviations based on errors GTO wannabes are likely to make with some unique adjustments here and there based on the player. As an online reg myself it becomes sort of boring to play these standardized strategies. I always stick around when someone is doing something vastly different, not because it's necessarily+EV but because it's very interesting to figure out what the dude is doing and how it can be countered even if I am not always the most successful at it.

  • @dnegspoker

    @dnegspoker

    Жыл бұрын

    It's been like that since I started. The consensus mocks the unconventional until they realize... hmm... this might just be good.

  • @david_cop_a_feel7538

    @david_cop_a_feel7538

    Жыл бұрын

    @@SkeeNnN - You need to take a break from poker and brush up on your writing ability. Your reply seems as if it was written by someone that was taught by a Mongoloid. monGOLOid

  • @plantsir9173
    @plantsir9173 Жыл бұрын

    I love watching a master work on his craft. Amazing video as usual

  • @sharronhumphries6727
    @sharronhumphries6727 Жыл бұрын

    Daniel, by far this is the best content on KZread !!!.....Thank you for sharing !!!.

  • @jagannathmudaliyar
    @jagannathmudaliyar Жыл бұрын

    These videos are gems,thanks Daniel.

  • @CrazeeAsh
    @CrazeeAsh Жыл бұрын

    I love your videos so much, thank you Daniel! You’re a treat

  • @romansavciuc9373
    @romansavciuc9373 Жыл бұрын

    Thank you very much, Daniel, for teaching us and educating us

  • @romansavciuc9373

    @romansavciuc9373

    Жыл бұрын

    @ᎠᎪΝᏆᎬᏞ ΝᎬᏀᎡᎬᎪΝႮ Hi, Daniel Is this correct your number or someone is using your name 🤔???

  • @jacobpallesen3558
    @jacobpallesen3558 Жыл бұрын

    Willing to learn ,never putting other players down in a mean way. Just a top top player..thats it really

  • @stephenjames2951
    @stephenjames2951 Жыл бұрын

    Great combination of entertaining and informative.

  • @raldrich5093
    @raldrich5093 Жыл бұрын

    Super interesting analysis. You, Phil and Addamo are fun to watch because you all play outside the GTO box. Great vid, thanks!

  • @killed_bya_bot7775

    @killed_bya_bot7775

    Жыл бұрын

    Addamo plays super GTO. He just does it differently to others.

  • @raldrich5093

    @raldrich5093

    Жыл бұрын

    @@killed_bya_bot7775 thanks, he is fun to watch. 😁

  • @KevinsDisobedience
    @KevinsDisobedience Жыл бұрын

    That’s a great analysis, recognizing that the outliers in poker have always played differently than the field. I think that’s why Phil does so well in low buy-in tournaments. They just can’t figure him out. Even though he has a tight image, everyone knows he is capable of randomly spazing and going zoom-zoom, especially when titled. If with that info, it’s still a tough nut to crack when he’s as careful as he is. Trapping is basically his only tool, but he uses it well.

  • @mrjoshharvey7017
    @mrjoshharvey7017 Жыл бұрын

    Excellent analysis video thank you

  • @fluffysheap
    @fluffysheap Жыл бұрын

    5:10 "Addamo's a beast, I've got position on him, so he's got absolutely nowhere to put his legs" 😅

  • @realizethelies
    @realizethelies Жыл бұрын

    Watching you got me into poker with the rest of the guys You're great and I really wish I could have saw Stu Ungar play You have a clairvoyant nature and I heard Stu was the master

  • @jeffcooper4225
    @jeffcooper4225 Жыл бұрын

    Heading to hybrid poker now. Thanks Daniel!!!!! I could definitely use that prize package!!!!!!!

  • @jeffcooper4225

    @jeffcooper4225

    Жыл бұрын

    Just took my test .. I need some help before that tourney begins.

  • @tcook2877
    @tcook2877 Жыл бұрын

    i love you dude. your a good guy and thx for the videos.

  • @ryanskiles4052
    @ryanskiles4052 Жыл бұрын

    Addamo will 100% watch this and he will get butterflies when he hears himself compared to Selbst

  • @D.WhiteJr
    @D.WhiteJr8 ай бұрын

    Your the man by going into depth on this stuff. I have jump in the deep end into GTO to build a good understanding. But at 36yr old I have too much oldschool in me to not try and mix it up and evolve with the table.

  • @herculeskritselis8612
    @herculeskritselis8612 Жыл бұрын

    thanks for the knowlege sharing dnges ! and i am dying with your impressions your so funyy!! hahahaha love ya

  • @bartermania
    @bartermania Жыл бұрын

    I’ll check out Hybrid… but I’m really holding my breath for the “Hee-Haw or Naw… should I Caw” new release. 😂☘️

  • @billybubba8344
    @billybubba8344 Жыл бұрын

    Pretty funny. You make some great points

  • @paulhiggins140
    @paulhiggins140 Жыл бұрын

    it's kind of hilarious to me that no one (before Addamo) had thought of, "wait, what if I put different bet sizes into solvers?"

  • @jonathanhenderson9422

    @jonathanhenderson9422

    Жыл бұрын

    They have, it's just that huge overbets/underbets are rarely ideal so most don't take the time/effort to study them, especially when every line you add to a solver (especially on the flop) adds exponentially to the solve time. It's just not a very economic use of one's study time to work on lines that are so rarely optimal. Also, even before solvers guys like Dwan were using huge overbets in certain spots; so Addamo is by no means the first to do it, he just seems to be one of the first that's really focused on implementing a strategy around it.

  • @iamamish

    @iamamish

    Жыл бұрын

    It's not that, it's that the combinatorics are insane. First, you need to study 1/3 pot, 1/2 pot, pot, etc. in order to understand your opponents' strategies. Then, you need to start studying unconventional lines to understand how they deviate from the more common lines, and understand what a good strategy would look like with non-standard bet sizes. Oh, and you also need to see how your opponents are adjusting to your new sizing so you can determine how to update your own strategy. It's asking an awful lot out of people, and there aren't many who are willing to invest this amount of time & effort into just studying.

  • @paulhiggins140

    @paulhiggins140

    Жыл бұрын

    @@jonathanhenderson9422 oh definitely, I'm mostly kidding -- of course people have played around with different bet sizes in solvers, and overbetting was always a thing (albeit rare), and Buttonclickr and some other HUNL guys had figured out overbets for HU. just surprising that Addamo was the first to really crunch the numbers and figure out massive overbet spots for MTTs, to such an extent that it surprised everyone and that he made $12m in a year or whatever

  • @arditpapa7963
    @arditpapa7963 Жыл бұрын

    Great player.I really enjoyed

  • @jsbmx2039
    @jsbmx2039 Жыл бұрын

    Good stuff

  • @roberthatch3149
    @roberthatch3149 Жыл бұрын

    When you look at how solvers check-raise the flop they usually use much more merged ranges than most people think. You need to have high, middle and low equity hands that give you the nuts on lots of runouts. If we make a weak club or unpaired ace fold here (which makes up quite a lot of Adamo's range), then it is a great outcome.

  • @Mike-qo4kp

    @Mike-qo4kp

    Жыл бұрын

    Sorry for having to ask this but what's a solver exactly?

  • @jeffcooper4225
    @jeffcooper4225 Жыл бұрын

    I’m taking notes🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤

  • @augustgreig9420
    @augustgreig9420 Жыл бұрын

    That's funny I didn't know that but I play PLO and almost always dinky bet 3 of a suit and people almost always fold, and it allows me to check when I flop the Ace high flush OR dinky bet.

  • @nickotine604
    @nickotine604 Жыл бұрын

    Yeah I've been working on gto and some of the solver solutions seem asinine. Most of the solutions make sense and have opened my eyes to other lines of thinking.

  • @beantrig
    @beantrig Жыл бұрын

    Once the first poker clip started I just got locked on winter and foxens convo about their legs 😂😂 completely forgot this was about addamo

  • @clintwalker3127
    @clintwalker3127 Жыл бұрын

    The Rinky dinky bet, dnegs has finally lost his mind! Love it

  • @agauerm
    @agauerm Жыл бұрын

    My game improved a lot when I stopped following traditional poker strategies like card ranges for each position, raising and re-raising pre-flop. I play a 45% range from all positions, I really don't care about position, to me it makes no difference. I also limp all my hands, I never raise preflop. Either everyone folds or over limp, and if someone raises I just cold call, does not matter, it just tells me they might have an A or K in their hand. Doing that allows me to see basically almost all flops for cheap. When I started doing that I was able to reach the bubble and final tables most of the time.

  • @Phantom-Eye

    @Phantom-Eye

    Жыл бұрын

    My Game is now much like you play. Limp, call mild raises, raise with optimum pairs. Position play~stay clear of the fish.~ Even when raising 4x pot with AA~ fish calls with 4/6 and wins.

  • @swardmusic

    @swardmusic

    Жыл бұрын

    @@Phantom-Eye you're the fish. Keep working on your game

  • @IZn0g0uDatAll
    @IZn0g0uDatAll Жыл бұрын

    It’s weird and inspiring how much Dnegs seems to change from year to year. Feels like a while ago it was all GTO and computer play, but now he seems to be back to play a highly exploitative poker. I guess if you truly understand GTO, you have a gigantic advantage when you decide to deviate and introduce imbalances in your play.

  • @fish4191
    @fish4191 Жыл бұрын

    Very nice of foxen to sacrifice leg room for his opponent. Although that could be an angle 😂

  • @joshuapatrick682
    @joshuapatrick68210 күн бұрын

    I am more interested in Sean Winter freaking out about where he will place his legs TBH. 😅

  • @stylin40s
    @stylin40s Жыл бұрын

    I took the hybridpoker IQ test, I got 62, all questions are cash game questions, I primarily play MTT and Sit n Go, there were spots that were easy folds in a SNG and fold wasn't an option. I'd love to play Sit N Go tourneys all day with anyone who scored 100. I'm sure it's good software, I wonder if they have ICM aware tests. All questions were even starting stacks of 1000, so there were no short stack considerations, no bubble play considerations, some of the spots you're put into were awkward for me because I would do everything I can to stay out of those spots and the people I play with don't play selected hands/call/raise nearly as wide as any solver. Good luck to the ones lucky enough to win, the $50k staking package

  • @jasondelpire9786
    @jasondelpire9786 Жыл бұрын

    My main hobby is chess and I have watched computers take over (I started plying before they were the absolute beats they are today). It is interesting to see top-tier poker players go through the same dismissing of results like chess players did 25+ years ago. Now, generally, the only dismissal of chess computer analysis is when the lines are just too unbelievable, I can't wait for when this happens to poker, though I doubt it will as the problems are "closed".

  • @tomonetruth

    @tomonetruth

    Жыл бұрын

    interesting perspective. in what way are poker problems "closed"?

  • @jasondelpire9786

    @jasondelpire9786

    Жыл бұрын

    @@tomonetruth in that the hands are solved individually, player trends are not included which is a huge aspect of the game. Chess programs solve to a ply, (each individual move is one ply), so a program may calculate to 30ply (15 moves by each player) which may or may not finish the game. A hand in poker is one piece of a tournament or cash game, so I called it closed. I hope that rambling makes sense.

  • @tomonetruth

    @tomonetruth

    Жыл бұрын

    @@jasondelpire9786 yes, I think so - it's closed because it's just an incident, not a complete game. That makes a lot of sense - playing gt optimal chess always means playing the move that leads to a win, whereas gt optimal poker often requires deliberately losing (folding) hands that could be won by playing suboptimally.

  • @tomonetruth

    @tomonetruth

    Жыл бұрын

    ...so a chess game, played optimally, will always deliver a win, whereas a poker hand, played optimally, will often mean folding the best hand.

  • @tomonetruth

    @tomonetruth

    Жыл бұрын

    @@jasondelpire9786 "player trends are not included which is a huge aspect of the game" - aren't solvers meant to approximate gto, though? in which case player trends are inconsequential.

  • @ImDrizzt
    @ImDrizzt Жыл бұрын

    i took the tset, im high as a kite, so the 3 first question i kinda moved on without changing the bar, and got them all wrong, but then oncei realized how to navigate, i got same score as you daniel, im maybe a prodigy!! i wonder what score would be if i didnt get 100% error on the first 3

  • @MegaAasdasdasd
    @MegaAasdasdasd Жыл бұрын

    i agree with your watch on Vanessa Selbst

  • @MM-ev1fg
    @MM-ev1fg Жыл бұрын

    The timing of the watch 😂 AI getting too smart.

  • @cedaster
    @cedaster Жыл бұрын

    Because of you everybody is limping on ps 😅 thanks for that 😉✌🏽

  • @dannykal
    @dannykal Жыл бұрын

    Live poker is so frustrating. I play $2/$3 and feel like I have a pretty good handle on ranges and what flops I'm supposed to be betting/checking, but I keep getting my money in at 60-40+ odds but inevitably lose on the turn/river.

  • @CMCMTTTV
    @CMCMTTTV Жыл бұрын

    I absolutely love both the Mike the Mouth comment and Daniel declaring solvers are idiots and have a weakness 😂😂😂

  • @Joerson
    @Joerson Жыл бұрын

    7:10 so funny 😂

  • @r.w.221
    @r.w.221 Жыл бұрын

    I was crushing my homegame for years. Last 6 months they are crushing me. When I look at the key hands after the session I am convinced I ran bad for the most part. But in fact I also lost confidence in play Standard Spots and that really bothers me…. How to change that…?

  • @jolaz69
    @jolaz69 Жыл бұрын

    Daniel, seems you break down hands you won. How about some hands where you took a line where you felt you had to fold or just lost?

  • @SpaceFaceProductions
    @SpaceFaceProductions Жыл бұрын

    Hey Dnegs do you think as a major poker personality that people are able/trying to find ways to exploit you more than normal players because a lot of the hands that you’ve played are so public?

  • @TEAMGETHELP

    @TEAMGETHELP

    Жыл бұрын

    Results show....

  • @joshuapatrick682
    @joshuapatrick68210 күн бұрын

    You know who I have never seen bluff the river on TV poker despite a maniac’s rep? Tony G…

  • @aaronjtRAW
    @aaronjtRAW Жыл бұрын

    Don’t be fooled - I was more interested in the table negotiations regarding leg room.

  • @jonathangoldsmith7832
    @jonathangoldsmith7832 Жыл бұрын

    Hey Daniel, why don’t you do a reaction to your old videos from when you were sponsored by Wynn and doing the heads up challenge? The one where you’re shining light on Small Ball?

  • @andreadams161
    @andreadams161 Жыл бұрын

    I really enjoy listening to your thought process however I believe small CBet is BRILLIANT. The beauty of the small cbet on a monotone boards is it can’t be exploited. You can bet your entire range and it almost never a mistake. You can get better hands to fold with air for dirty cheap. It only need to work less than 20% of the time. It’s tough for a player to continue on monotone out of position without that suit especially against turn barrels. If you get raised you comfortably fold your air and lose the minimum. Adammo never hand to worry if he folded the best hand. No one is re raise bluffing on monotone boards with pure air it’s suicide. When you do flop a flush you keep your opponent range wide and get value on the turn. When you flop a flush and get re raise your opponent range is well defined. They most likely have 2 pair or a set and a long a the board doesn’t pair you will have the best hand quite often. With the A of that suit if you face a re raise you got options and you don’t have to call a huge raise size because you bet small of the flop. Opponents rarely re raising a flop flush because it lets you get off the hook with your air. If you are betting into a flop flush in position you can realize your equity for a small investment with the bet check decide line.

  • @DirkCannon
    @DirkCannon Жыл бұрын

    Negraenu going for that Arthur Morgan look im for it

  • @succatash
    @succatash Жыл бұрын

    Who owns hybrid poker and can other poker players buy the data?

  • @sergeya3078
    @sergeya3078 Жыл бұрын

    11:00 do you call 96o pre?

  • @YTSparty
    @YTSparty Жыл бұрын

    "finding out where I am" - That's my strategy. How many times do you see some idiot who checks on the flop or turn, only to get to the river and have ZERO information on where they are? It's like "dude, had you just done a small raise post-flop, you'd have some information on what your opp had, now you're in the dark with absolutely no idea if the ALL-IN is because you look weak or they have the nuts". I see all these supposed pros who make terrible calls because their play is all over the place. And they have no idea how to put together a narrative to figure out what they are facing.

  • @gilo8721
    @gilo8721 Жыл бұрын

    Are solvers an online poker thing? I never play. Or wish to play online. It’s boring. Plus being behind a computer and phone all day at work has made me sick of computers lol

  • @sk8rtuti
    @sk8rtuti Жыл бұрын

    There's a phrase that's popular called "Giving someone their flowers" and the phrase is easy to understand - you give credit where credit is due. And it's so awesome that you give Vanessa Selbts her flowers

  • @bullveigh2526
    @bullveigh2526 Жыл бұрын

    Has Daniel showed is hand since the Vegas incident? Did it heal all good

  • @OsefKincaid
    @OsefKincaid Жыл бұрын

    Preeeetty sure the solver doesn't want you to call that Addamo shove with AK. I'd have to check again.

  • @OsefKincaid

    @OsefKincaid

    Жыл бұрын

    Yes I remember now, this was a spot where the solver wanted to call with KK-TT and fold AK-AT. I remember this because I spent some time trying to figure out why the fuck the solver wanted to do that and I never managed to.

  • @OsefKincaid

    @OsefKincaid

    Жыл бұрын

    (Aaaand I just figured out why, let's go :D)

  • @jonathangoldsmith7832
    @jonathangoldsmith7832 Жыл бұрын

    Finding out where your at with a raise can still be balanced.

  • @MrAshaw83
    @MrAshaw83 Жыл бұрын

    I'm definately not an expert, but always figured that 'being balanced' / GTO approach was waaay overvalued. Sure if you play against the same player pool constantly it's more valid, but regular people playing poker don't have to worry about that.

  • @thoughtgrenades
    @thoughtgrenades Жыл бұрын

    Love to listen to the listening logs on that watch...

  • @libertyforamericanow
    @libertyforamericanow Жыл бұрын

    I couldn't figure out how the betting slide scale works on the iq test.

  • @Victestr0104
    @Victestr0104 Жыл бұрын

    Danny dropped his balls on the table and said “fuhgetaboutit” lol.

  • @ninjawood4058
    @ninjawood4058 Жыл бұрын

    I'm personally more interested in the side conversation between Foxen and Winters. That leg room shit is a real thing at the tables...

  • @ijustwannaleaveacommentony6511

    @ijustwannaleaveacommentony6511

    Жыл бұрын

    guy in the sunglasses needs assertiveness training

  • @a777702
    @a777702 Жыл бұрын

    I'd love to see you do a video that covers in depth how the meta game has evolved in poker over the years.

  • @paulreed4231
    @paulreed4231 Жыл бұрын

    I bought that GTO book on Daniels recommendation, and it is a good book but I considered rock paper scissors myself

  • @AnandRaj-dl3df

    @AnandRaj-dl3df

    Жыл бұрын

    Which book is that?

  • @paulreed4231

    @paulreed4231

    Жыл бұрын

    @@AnandRaj-dl3df Modern Poker Theory by Michael Acevedo

  • @bepriceless
    @bepriceless Жыл бұрын

    I hate it when those big guys bully at the table; using their legs to make you uncomfortable. It happens to me all the time; the don't move when you ask nicely. I call the floor and make them balance the table. Those tables with corners totally suck.

  • @slimbrady3758
    @slimbrady3758 Жыл бұрын

    love how these 2 are still going at it over friggin leg room!! its a poker table not an airplane seat

  • @alexnum
    @alexnum Жыл бұрын

    7:08 😂😂

  • @KiraPlaysGuitar
    @KiraPlaysGuitar6 ай бұрын

    Is it ever considered a strategy to make wild shoves with air and in a way *want* to get called just so it messes with your image, even if you get knocked out that particular moment? (So you can induce more calls with the nuts down the line) Like once people knew Daniel was never bluffing the river, presumably he started bluffing more, are we basically saying that he was intentionally losing hands/situations, or at least being willing to lose in those spots, to influence his own image in the grander scheme?

  • @rockingjconstruction
    @rockingjconstruction Жыл бұрын

    So Hybrid poker looked good. A couple spots I question, 1. It's says to fold JJ on the btn to a CO raise 25% of the time. 2. Fold AQo in the SB to an UG open 100% of the time. And it appears to be cash game gto so not much h good for a tournament player.

  • @mikemillican5852
    @mikemillican5852 Жыл бұрын

    WHAT IS THE OUTRO SONG CALLED PLEEEEEAAAASSSSEEEE!!!!!!!!

  • @TwoAcesGolf

    @TwoAcesGolf

    Жыл бұрын

    Ocean Roads by Swif7

  • @haroldroa1806
    @haroldroa1806 Жыл бұрын

    what did you put in your eyelashes man ;)

  • @stevezagieboylo9172
    @stevezagieboylo9172 Жыл бұрын

    I've been saying for a while that there is no way for me to win with a GTO approach, just because there are too many people who can do it better than I. However, I do understand the math, and I'd like to put together two different unexploitable ranges and switch between them. A range doesn't have to be GTO to be unexploitable; it just has to be properly balanced. It will still lose in the long run to a perfect GTO approach, but only because it is not optimized. That is, GTO is an optimized, unexploitable range, but there are other unexploitable ranges. The first range would use bigger bets and a higher percentage of bluffs, while dropping a lot of thin value bets. It sounds crazy that bigger bets mean a higher percentage of bluffs, but it does. If you really want to discuss it I am willing to, but if you just want to "correct me" and don't want to talk some serious math, then please don't bother. I do have the math to back it up. The short answer is that you aren't bluffing more, you're just value betting less, just checking a lot of thin value that a GTO range would be betting. This makes for a higher percentage of bluffs vs value bets, not a higher percentage of bluffs overall. In fact, both go down in overall percentage, but value bets go down more than bluffs. The second range would use even smaller bets than GTO, which means fewer bluffs and a lower bluff percentage. My idea is that the really good players would think that I have an exploitable pattern and would try to adjust to this in an exploitative way. By deviating from GTO, they are themselves exploitable. I would switch between my two ranges depending on whom I am against in a particular hand. The attempts to exploit my oversize betting would actually lose even more to the smaller-size ranges, and vice versa.

  • @ijustwannaleaveacommentony6511
    @ijustwannaleaveacommentony6511 Жыл бұрын

    i didn't understand the point. i thought we were discussing a hand were daniel got knocked out of a tourny

  • @connorhowes3337
    @connorhowes3337 Жыл бұрын

    Hey Daniel, I love this type of content thanks for making this. I just wanted to point out that in bvb hands in LIMPED hands, the gto strategy involves an 80% CHECK across monotone flops. Seems a little different than how you are perceiving this spot. Obviously this hand is different as it was a raised pot but it is certainly not the strategy you highlighted in the beginning across all bvb spots

  • @NefariousMinds
    @NefariousMinds Жыл бұрын

    Min bet is pretty much a check.

  • @SilverDragons47
    @SilverDragons47 Жыл бұрын

    thumbnail is a little off on the sides

  • @FishinWithAlex
    @FishinWithAlex Жыл бұрын

    Siri destroyed Vanessa Selbst 😂

  • @themartialartsapproach8786
    @themartialartsapproach8786 Жыл бұрын

    Wife sticks her head in to tell one of the best poker players in history how the game is. Classic.

  • @Ransmith12
    @Ransmith12 Жыл бұрын

    The 👑👑👑

  • @kibspoker
    @kibspoker Жыл бұрын

    OMG im one of first few to comment 😱 dunno if you”ll see these.. YOU ARE MY HERO Daniel ❤ always rootin for yah. Mount Rushmore of poker. Take care!

  • @kevlar785

    @kevlar785

    Жыл бұрын

    Ewww dude gross. Do you think he’s going to give you money or something? Sad world

  • @kibspoker

    @kibspoker

    Жыл бұрын

    @@kevlar785 Nope. Just a fan sir 🥰 im still a poor boy doing the grind at the micro stakes. 😍 but gotta start somewhere 😓

  • @ninjawood4058
    @ninjawood4058 Жыл бұрын

    4:27 freudian slip

  • @ffallenaangel
    @ffallenaangel Жыл бұрын

    After this i wen to watch "he called with q10 honey"

  • @ronaldbarnes1746
    @ronaldbarnes1746 Жыл бұрын

    I think the future will be experts limping pre flop more often. Every coach says never do that and if the first one in to raise. The limps will throw off the new experts. Wont know what to do.

  • @CMCMTTTV

    @CMCMTTTV

    Жыл бұрын

    Sure they will. It's not hard to construct a range for limps and work out what to do against them. Daniel totally overrates how much this aspect was responsible for his success.

  • @olephillyboy
    @olephillyboy Жыл бұрын

    But who won the great leg debate?

  • @josephearl2919
    @josephearl2919Ай бұрын

    Big D youare the best

  • @gogothewind123
    @gogothewind123 Жыл бұрын

    Daniel saying solvers are geniuses but also dumb reminds me a lot of GothamChess talking about chess engines. They're geniuses but they make moves that make no sense for a human because a human can't follow the strategy the way a computer can. If you can't compute 30 moves ahead then the best move isn't always the best move for you.

  • @pnwbb5507
    @pnwbb5507 Жыл бұрын

    Even his watch knew that comment about selbst was sus

  • @mikesmith1485
    @mikesmith1485 Жыл бұрын

    But how is more rake better?

  • @420villain

    @420villain

    Жыл бұрын

    Casinos can stay in business to serve customers longer

  • @clintwalker3127
    @clintwalker3127 Жыл бұрын

    Addamo doesn’t input anything into solvers, He IS a Solver!

  • @nicklenz7030
    @nicklenz7030 Жыл бұрын

    Hi, I like your videos, very educating. (off topic: in the background there is something from 1999 mentioning Trump Taj Mahal. Wouldn't it be nice to put sth else there, that is not so controversial as the name Trump? Thanks for considering).

  • @robertdavis100
    @robertdavis100 Жыл бұрын

    i was distractedly by the bickering

  • @Shipdacheese
    @Shipdacheese Жыл бұрын

    That guy at the table is wearing a mask whilst touching the same chips everyone touches! :)) Well done buddy! Well done!

  • @lh5636
    @lh5636 Жыл бұрын

    bro addamo isnt joking in that spot, 45% to call 400% and 40% for 200% required

  • @kubanos999
    @kubanos999 Жыл бұрын

    Épic shit.

  • @maxwellfletcher3698
    @maxwellfletcher3698 Жыл бұрын

    I mean..if you've got 2 empty seats to your right, you cant bitch about not having room lmao

  • @den_bavini
    @den_bavini Жыл бұрын

    Bro why u are so f8 cool

  • @26bisket50
    @26bisket50 Жыл бұрын

    Even the biggest idiots in poker will get curious when they see you constantly throwing out biggish bets, that’s why some balance is always key. The exploitable part of the equation in those guys is betting whatever you want when you know they will chase whatever

  • @paulpena5040
    @paulpena5040 Жыл бұрын

    I don't see why Dnegs thinks the solver is stupid. It makes obvious sense. On a monotone board if you have the nuts, it's likely your opponent has very thin value so you don't want to blow him off his hand and if you don't have anything you can often get folds for cheap. Dnegs raised "targeting" the "silly" strategy but it's just tantamount to a bluff. If your opponent has you crushed congrats you just punted 17K, if not you risked a lot to win a little.

Келесі