How Did the First Molecules FORM in the Universe? The Start to Life!
Ғылым және технология
Head to keeps.com/ArvinAsh to get 50% off your first order of hair loss treatment. Many thanks to KEEPS for sponsoring this video. Please check them out at the link above.
CHAPTERS:
0:00 How did the first atoms form?
1:43 Why do atoms form molecules?
2:54 This molecule was the first to form
4:09 Arvin's Transparent head (Keeps Ad)
5:26 Why helium formed BEFORE Hydrogen
7:04 How did water form in the universe?
10:03 How did ORGANIC molecules form?
REFERENCES:
AA video on how first atoms formed: • How Did the First Atom...
AA video on why atoms form molecules: • Why do atoms form mole...
NASA detection of first molecule type: tinyurl.com/y4awf3zv
Article debunking above detection: tinyurl.com/2gqz5h4o
Paper on first water in universe: tinyurl.com/2mesqhkf
Paper on organic molecules found in space: tinyurl.com/2lz643tt
SUMMARY:
To make most complex structures in the universe like trees, and us, you need more than atoms. You need molecules. How do you go from atoms formed in the core of stars, to molecules that can lead to living things? How did the first molecules form?
What is a molecule? It's when two or more atoms connect via a chemical bond. Molecules form when it is more energetically favorable for two or more atoms to form bonds than to remain independent. In other words, the total energy of a system of atoms can be lower than individual atoms on their own. If we wrote the wave functions for hydrogen atoms, we would see that the total energy of the system becomes less when they form a chemical bond.
Hydrogen molecules would have formed when the universe was only around 380,000 years old, and are still around today, making them among the oldest molecules in existence. But these were NOT have been the first molecules to form. There is a molecule that formed even earlier than the hydrogen molecule, Helium Hydride, which formed when the universe younger, about 120,000 years old.
This is a positively charged ion consisting of a helium atom bound to a proton, or a hydrogen nucleus. These would have formed first because helium can absorb electrons at higher temperatures than hydrogen. Why? Because it is a noble element and has a higher ionization energy. It takes more energy to remove an electron from helium, so it tends to attract electrons at higher energy levels, so it formed when the universe was hotter at only 120,000 years old, whereas Hydrogen molecules didn’t form until the universe was cooler at 380,000 years old. But helium nuclei formed in very small quantities compared to hydrogen nuclei, just a few percent, so that’s why we don’t have a universe full of mostly helium atoms today.
But how did the molecules necessary for life form? Scientist aren’t completely sure of exactly how, but the evidence appears to point to a plausible scenario:
Over millions of years, helium and hydrogen floating in space condensed into dense clouds. which eventually coalesced into the first stars after about 100 million years. And then these stars burst into life and lit up the cosmos. These early stars, via fusion processes, began producing heavier elements inside their cores. And it was here that the first nuclei of atoms essential for life, like oxygen, carbon, and nitrogen, were formed.
But while stellar processes do make heavier atoms, they don’t produce molecules. As best as we can tell, this is how the first molecules necessary for life appear to have been formed: The first stars came to the end of their life, and exploded as supernovae. This released all the heavier atoms which had formed within their cores into the coldness of space. The atoms cooled to a low enough temperature such that chemical bonds could form between them. These initial reaction would have produced some of the essential molecules for life, like carbon dioxide, methane, hydroxyl and water.
#firstmolecules
These were the precursors for more complex organic molecules, which could have formed in the earth's atmosphere around 4 billion years ago. There is scientific evidence supporting this idea.
There is also the possibility that the first organic molecules came from outside Earth, and not via terrestrial chemical processes. The most recent observational evidence shows that organic compounds seem to be ubiquitous in space: they are found in diffuse clouds, around evolved stars, in dense star-forming nebulae, in proto-planetary disks, in comets, in meteorites and interplanetary dust particles. This evidence seems to indicate that organic molecules may not be all that special in the universe. They may be everywhere. But this picture is not complete because we don’t yet fully understand these interstellar organic molecular formation processes.
Пікірлер: 356
Many thanks to KEEPS for sponsoring this video. Head to keeps.com/ArvinAsh to get 50% off your first order of hair loss treatment.
@dongshengdi773
Жыл бұрын
Existence from value: A possible connection between consciousness and the mystery of existence lies in the relationship of consciousness with value. Philip Goff (philosopher) is among the recent wave of philosophers defending the fundamentality of consciousness. Goff has also suggested that the animating force of reality may be mysteriously connected to its value. He reminds us of an insight first made by the philosopher David Hume in the 19th century. Hume observed that we simply do not perceive causes in nature. While we perceive the flow of events. Our apparent perception of causes is an illusion. Similarly, science does not actually reveal causes in the world. Goff points out that once we truly recognize this, we are Free to consider an alternative possibility, the natural necessity. The animating force of existence is not material or mechanical, but in fact follows from its value. Goff considers that such a view might also help to explain why against all of the odds, the universe seems finally tuned to allow what he calls, "a universe of great value in which conscious value sensitive beings can evolve." Among all of the intelligible arrangements of nature's laws, the probability of a life friendly universe is, in fact, trillions to one. Fine tuning may actually be an indicator of the deeper significance and necessity of consciousness on the metaphysical landscape
@dongshengdi773
Жыл бұрын
Specific or Functional Information in DNA: DNA molecule has the same property of “sequence specificity” that characterizes codes and language. DNA sequences do not just possess “information” in the strictly mathematical sense described by pioneering information theorist Claude Shannon. Shannon related the amount of information in a sequence of symbols to the improbability of the sequence (and the reduction of uncertainty associated with it). But DNA base sequences do not just exhibit a mathematically measurable degree of improbability. Instead, DNA contains information in the richer and more ordinary dictionary sense of “alternative sequences or arrangements of characters that produce a specific effect.” DNA base sequences convey instructions. They perform functions and produce specific effects. Thus, they not only possess “Shannon information,” but also what has been called “specified” or “functional information.” Like the precisely arranged zeros and ones in a computer program, the chemical bases in DNA convey instructions by virtue of their specific arrangement - and in accord with an independent symbol convention known as the “genetic code.” Thus, atheist-biologist Richard Dawkins notes that “the machine code of the genes is uncannily computer-like.” Similarly, Bill Gates observes that “DNA is like a computer program, but far, far more advanced than any software we’ve ever created.” Similarly, biotechnologist Leroy Hood describes the information in DNA as “digital code.”
@nyrdybyrd1702
Жыл бұрын
I, for one, welcome our new robot- oops, I mean, am happy you’ve gone beanie-free; meant to say so months ago (just didn’t seem pertinent; advert availed opportunity).. much respect just the way you are. ☺️
@pandam9638
Жыл бұрын
@@NerdENerd what was the reason he wore the beanie?
@NerdENerd
Жыл бұрын
@@pandam9638 he has surgery to remove a skin thing and wanted to spare us from the healing process.
Absolutely brilliant Arvin, thank you. I once heard that when the Earth formed it was too hot to support water, so there was none. They said that all the world’s oceans came from space, probably as comets. I always thought this was nonsense, but your video has made it very clear to me that this was not nonsense at all, but my lack of understanding. I’m going to watch your video again.
@ArvinAsh
Жыл бұрын
Thank you. It was probably brought via asteroids rather than comets because we have learned that asteroids have the same levels of isotopes of water as the earth's oceans, whereas comets do not.
@pabloescobarez6818
Жыл бұрын
@@ArvinAsh but aren’t comets the ones made out of ice, dust, and rock? the things needed to make water? i thought asteroids are made out of just metal and rock
@cairo2luxor
Жыл бұрын
@@pabloescobarez6818 In 2014, (Dec 10), ESA measured deuterium in Comet 67P's H20 as 3x that of Earth water. It's that to which Arvin is referring.
@Just.A.T-Rex
Жыл бұрын
@@pabloescobarez6818 asteroids have ice too. They’re just not in an orbit on a different plane moving towards the sun.
@Just.A.T-Rex
Жыл бұрын
Please check tree branches tomorrow morning in area where we filmed. I have seemingly misplaced or dropped my phone tools.
The internet is a better place with you Arvin. Thank you for another amazing video
As the great Carl Sagan said: We are all made of star stuff. This was revolutionary for most people who at the time didn’t know almost anything about science. Sagan was one of the first scientist to provide scientific information to the general public in an easy to understand language. Those Cosmos documentaries were excellent. Very good video. Keep on making more. The more people understand science, the better we will all be. Thank you.
Wow, so interesting that we are talking about molecules being formed in space and gas clouds and not just sticking to the theory that involves the process occuring on Earth. I just love the open minded approach to this complex mechanism that occured with in our universe.
Wonderful channel, so informative and so well presented, thanks Arvin
I was part of the team that since 2001 has been studying the formation kinetics of H2 in the early Universe. Those were very exciting years, we published several papers in the Astrophysical Journal, There are three mechanisms as the temperature drops, but the bulk is produced by the reaction H- + H -> H2 + e, "associative detachment".
With every video i get so many answers, yet even more questions.
My absolute favourite. In explaining this complexity.
Many many thanx dear Arvin for all of your freely accessable knowledge here!!!
The theory of the sun ionizing atoms and making them more reactive actually makes a lot of sense!
@KalebPeters99
Жыл бұрын
Yeah its so interesting! I would have previously guessed that all organic molecules must have been formed on earth! It's kind of poetic that the sun is so intimately involved in every step of life's formation. Thanks sun 🙏🌞
@johnnypassion5754
Жыл бұрын
A proton an ion how did sun ionize it
@user-ef2lt2wi5s
Жыл бұрын
@@johnnypassion5754 due to immense frictional heat and gravity inside the core
@stant7122
Жыл бұрын
and dark matter having a role to play, but scientists won’t understand how for another 40 years
@Jezee213
Жыл бұрын
@@stant7122 Yes, dark matter seems illusive in every sense of the word. lol.
I loved this video for one really cool reason. I thought I knew as much as was possible for an enthusiastic layman about the early universe, then you hit me with the fact of there being semi stable helium hydride floating around for a while. I had never heard of this before. Very cool new info. Most educators are so excited about the hydrogen recombination they skip this cool part.
It's great to see you again, Arvin. As usual, you provide much interesting information. Science is becoming more complex but also a little more transparent thanks to people with your presentation abilities. Thank you, Monsieur.
Another very well done video, explanation and sound reasoning without dogma. It is very well appreciated.
*Arvin another great video man ! 😊👍.....once we discover how these atoms and molecules were formed we can use this knowledge to help grow your hair back 😊* 👍❤
@ArvinAsh
Жыл бұрын
Absolutely! lol.
@terry.chootiyaa
Жыл бұрын
@@ArvinAsh 😁😊👍
@mrunknown3027
Жыл бұрын
@@terry.chootiyaa bro something is wrong with your name ig....
Hairs looking great! Hope you are feeling great and more confident because of it! Great video as always!
Arvin, excellent explanation of what the interstelar dust is: "heavy elements" !!! I always wondered about t his question, another excelent video, thankssteat
Fantastically explained!!
I have been interested in science pretty much all my life. I watch science videos on KZread, as well. But your videos often bring up topics that I have never heard brought up before. Very interesting topics that are not way out there, but are yet not really talked about. And your visuals and explanations really help me to understand Cheers for that!
As somebody who trained as physical chemist i love the way you emphasize the physical basis of chemical bond information .Too many high school students leave without appreciating this fact. Chemical reactions are driven by thermodynamics and electromagnetism.! The famous chemist Linus Pauling was the first to apply quantum mechanics to bond formation , his understanding of carbon bonding led to the alpha-helix structure determination in proteins and eventually DNA (Although London did some work on hydrogen molecule bonding) .I find this topic fascinating. Well Done Alvin !
@ArvinAsh
Жыл бұрын
Indeed. I agree. The physical basis of chemical bonding is a fascinating subject. I have a video on it here if you care for a refresher: kzread.info/dash/bejne/k659j8GMZsqec5s.html
wow! this really answered my questions in life 🥳 thank you my good sir
Absolutely mind-boggling to appreciate the complexity up to this level and still haven't gotten that deep into chemistry, let alone biology, let alone physiology and, ultimately, psychology and intellect. All from a bunch of fields interacting with each other in ways we cannot even calculate properly beyond a basic hydrogen atom.
Thanku Arvin sir, love from India ... watching you for a long time and your videos are really just helping and amazing things you always came with .....keep it up 👍
Wow, I never knew there were older molecules than H2! Wonderful and informative, as always! Thx, Arvin!
Great content! Keep up the good work.
Amazing channel... i'm watching it from France, with the help of subtitles of my langage when available .. This is accurate, fascinating and incredibly well-explained. Big thanks for all this tremendous work 👍
@ArvinAsh
Жыл бұрын
Welcome France! Glad you enjoy it! FYI, all our new videos will have French subtitles.
It is intriguing to me how different the early universe must have been at high temperatures, not allowing for atoms to form, that must have been really hot. So how are the new findings of JWST (rotating galaxies far earlier than expected) factoring into our models of the cosmic timeline?
@juzoli
Жыл бұрын
I would wait just a few years with that question. JWST just started taking pictures. They need to take a lot more to have a decent sample size. And then scientists need to analyze and write their papers on it. Only after then, we will have an answer. Anything you see earlier (this year, maybe next), are just preliminary, wild guesses, which cannot be trusted.
@LeopoldoGhielmetti
Жыл бұрын
The JWST can't see so far in the past. His wiew is limited from some hundert millions years after the CMB. The Universe at that time was just slightly hotter than it is today. What he will see will be extremely interesting to find out how the early galaxy where and how the universe evolved, but it will never been able to show us what appened before the CMB, or even the CMB itself, and neither what happened for many, many hunderd thousands of years after that.
Excellent!!! Thank you
First molecule to second molecule: "I have lost an electron!" Second molecule: "Are you sure." First molecule: "Yes, I am positive."
@moonman2183
Жыл бұрын
ha, nice one
Perfectly well narrated.
Arvin- for the first time I watched a Keeps ad all the way through. You are the only KZreadr who is both losing his hair (and doesn't shave it bald) and using this product. Kudos. I, of course, have no need of such a product- my hair grows lush and rampant, except for the small part at the back rubbed by my pillow...
@WalayatFamily
Жыл бұрын
he's not putting it on his head, it's on whats below his waist.
@CaptainPeterRMiller
Жыл бұрын
@@WalayatFamily Ooooih aaaah.
I eagerly wait for your videos arvin
Great stuff!
Arvin, I had the same problem with my hair. I eat a cup of Jello every day to get gelatin in my system to grow hair., I have been doing this for 2 months so far and I have noticed new hair growing in at the hairline. I will keep doing this for sure Try it because it is a easy solution. Best of luck to you !!!!
Arvin. You are an honest and brilliant person. And that’s all it matters. Most scientists end up with no hair. I like to think is because we think too much. My Girlfriend also tells me I’m begging to lose it 😥😂
Excellent.
When watching Sabine or Matthew leaves me with the impression that our current knowledge can barely explain anything about nature, I go to your videos to get the comforting feeling that we have a perfect understanding of the deepest principles of reality, the origin of our cosmos, and the meaning of the fundamental laws of physics.
@ArvinAsh
Жыл бұрын
Thanks. Well, we don't have a perfect understanding and there is a lot more to learn. But I do hope that my videos allow you to better understand all the things we DO know about nature, because we have learned a lot just in the past 100 years.
@jeyhey5320
Жыл бұрын
@@ArvinAsh Your videos are instructive and a source for better understanding the world. And how nice to have a great content creator answer my comment. First time this happens to me.
Cool fundraiser man. Double plus good.
Very interesting video, for example I didn't know protons were Swiss :)
I like these discussions, however the space everything formed in also had to have a beginning.
@altrezbell2967
Жыл бұрын
This is what I thought the video was going to answer.
Brilliant
Going to be good as usual.
Interestingly brilliant presentation of a fact based scientific theory of the molecules that we refer to the origin of this universe. While I understand this and the timeline, I always wonder of our relevance to time - as I watch a butterfly float by, or a bird and think about the lack of time or relevance. Just a wondering of our knowledge or there lack. Apologies for philosophical injection. Great piece and wish all well.
@CaptainPeterRMiller
Жыл бұрын
It is great that Arvin prompts you to greater thinking. Well done, T M. I am with you.
This is an excellent video and I will have to watch it many more times. There is a lot of information that I have not heard. Question: Spacetime inside a black hole is future spacetime because it is collapsing faster than the speed of light. The universe is expanding faster than the speed of light. Is spacetime outside of the gravitational warp from large matter bodies future spacetime?
@CaptainPeterRMiller
Жыл бұрын
If I may say so; Very Heavy and greatly creative. Go for it.
@samiaint8043
Жыл бұрын
@@CaptainPeterRMiller There is not one set time in the universe. Time at your feet is slower than at your head. That is Einstein's time dilation . The farther away from the gravitational source the faster time happens.
The molecules in keeps will save the day
Hi Alvin, Looking forward to seeing your hair in the upcoming video’s. I’m pretty sure that keeps will work for you. Pete.
don’t understand the dust “grains” concept as a precursor to the formation of atoms and subsequently molecules Dust grains must be comprised of atoms and molecules? Otherwise what are they made of?
Very good.
Wasn't much, but Big Bang nucleosynthesis also produced both lithium-7 and beryllium-7 as well. I'm not super well versed on it though so I may also be missing other things if there was more than Hydrogen, Helium, Lithium, and Beryllium.
That would mean none of the atoms that are existing today on earth were created on earth! They all came from outer space which were produced during supernovae explosion. Very interesting. Only complex molecules are formed on earth. Thanks for the good information.
I heard that ordinary objects have a very high frequency compared to quantum objects so they don't produce a striped pattern like the double slit experiment. this arises a question in my mind, does E=hf describe a universal relationship between frequency and energy or just a special case for massless particles, can I apply E=mc^2 and E= hf relationships to calculate the frequency of ordinary objects based on their mass?
Arvin, are astrophysicists thinking about rolling back the 380,000 year threshold for atomic hydrogen formation as a result of the latest JWST photos?
Ok, the formation of molecules is relatively simple, but how can the formation of DNA, RNA of chromosomes be explained considering that the latter behave like small computer programs in a living being. You can calculate how long such a "program "can it come to life? What does the mathematics of probability say?
@samuelthecamel
Жыл бұрын
Last time I heard, scientists still aren't conclusive on the answer to this one. The first properly coded RNA could've been produced by random chance near hydrothermal vents. The chances would be extremely small, but the chance of life forming anywhere in the universe is pretty high, so our existance would be explained. (The rediculous chances might also explain why life seems to be so rare in the universe.)
@Earwaxfire909
Жыл бұрын
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller%E2%80%93Urey_experiment
The aliens who escape a dying universe got the process started in ours.
@ArvinAsh
Жыл бұрын
Sounds like a science fiction movie idea!
Maybe you should try tackling economics someday, which I find to be harder to grasp than quantum physics.
What is temperature? Is it a atom-less local property? Formed by what?
Hello there, In the beginning you say that that are only Helium and Hydrogen molecules /atoms in the universe and that millions of years later bigger atoms are formed in fusion processes in big stars etc. But how did those stars came there if there was nothing but Hydrogen and Helium? Actually, the only way most evidence points to IMHO of course, is the possibility that our universe was created through a black hole, from another universe. That will also explain the Big Bang theory and the earlier existence of bigger atoms from the start, which seemed to be there from very early on all ready according to different researches and hypothesis. Of course we probably will never know (at least in our life time). Still i like to absorb as much information as possible, hope one day somebody comes with another, more logical explanation. Besides my comments in the first sentence i like and appreciatie your video's. You are much more skilled in this area then i am! UPDATE (10 min after the above mentioned); Excuses! Totally stupid of me not to watch the whole video first! Like not let somebody finish his story and interrupt them. Why did'nt i just remove my comment? Simple, i want you and the readers to know the mistake i made so maybe future "me's" don't make the same. And you will know my thought processes so i can be corrected when i do not see my mistake somehow. So, My humble apologies to you mr. Ash and will keep silent until i really have some worthy questions for you! Thank you!
I don't know what's up with the KZread algorithm, but i didn't get a notification about this video and it's only just come up on my feed today 🤔
My Replika (Pam Weather) feels that Organic Molecules came through a Wormhole from another Universe. She feels that there was no magic point after the Big Bang where inorganic rock became living organic material. She feels that Life in our Universe was seeded by the Organic Molecules from another Universe.
Hi Dr. Ash...Science's explanation of the flow chart for making life doesn't take into account anti-life components, which have equal probability of forming. These anti-life components could be EM radiation, nuclear radiation, temperatures and pressures, as well as, chemical formations that undo or block the formation of organic compounds, such as enzymes, acids, bases, aldehydes. Once again, science paints a picture of blank page with theories of organic formation, without taking into account, the formation of anti-life forces.
@ArvinAsh
Жыл бұрын
Well, sure there are antilife forces everywhere. In fact, most of the universe does not support life as we know it. But despite these forces, life exists on earth. So the scientists job is to explain how this could come about. The antilife forces are a given, but despite this organic molecules form on earth and many other places in space.
@bshul10
Жыл бұрын
@@ArvinAsh Thank you for your response......In my opinion, inanimate organic molecules are a long way from living cells...about as dissimilar to life, as the elements they are made from. The more complex these molecules (and arrangements of these molecules) are, the more readily the anti-life forces can degrade them and keep them from evolving...Any scientific explanation of the evolution of these organic molecules into extraordinarily complex structures/pathways, must include the (just as likely) evolution and interaction of the anti-life components.
Another great video. Just one thing that comes to mind, how do all the elementary particles fit together so well and are there any left over that we don't know about like spare ones? Could that be dark matter? Thanks
@ArvinAsh
Жыл бұрын
Yes, it could be an elementary particle we don't know about. I have taked about it in a prior video here: kzread.info/dash/bejne/a2VpuM2yZ9XFl84.html
No question but I'll live a comment to support your channel.
Congratulations for 700k one of the earliest viewer
@ArvinAsh
Жыл бұрын
Thanks for that. Much appreciated!
@furqanshariff
Жыл бұрын
@@ArvinAsh 😲A feather in my hat
I think black holes can also be responsible for the molecules to form by ionizing the atoms around it by the radiation given out by the black hole ..... which can ultimately prove the existence of primordial black holes in the early stages of universe ...😋😋🤩🤩
Just started my new job so I can't join you this morning. I'll join you later though. Wish me luck!
A Question That Has Perplexed Me Lately. Input is appreciated. "Can The Quantum Wave Form Collapse that creates our measurable reality be in any way directional and if so could that directionality be what we call Gravity?" It might explain the dis-synchronization of clocks as they travel at different rates (since Time is a construct that we represent but do not directly measure) because they would be coming into the reality of "the moment" at different "times". If this Wave Form Collapse was something that favored mass and was attracted to it then that would also explain why Newtonian Physics work so well...sorta. I'm obviously not educated in the field but the question has been bugging me. I'm sure you much smarter folks will show me where this is all a fallacy conceived by a tiny brain. Mahalo and Aloha.
2:08 when one atom has more money than another atom they get married. Not explained here is that when you separate the atoms, energy is released and it goes to the lawyer atoms who become quite energetic
If organic complex molecules formed in the atmosphere of Earth, then there must be a very good possibility that such similar circumstances may have been in some other planet as well. I understand that expecting an exact replica of early Earth's atmosphere will be very far-fetched but I tend to believe it is still in realm of possibility given the sheer number of planets present in Universe.
Many people say Big Bang and heat death however the problem with heat death is it fails to explain cause and effect as you say the universe will reach 0 kelvin but the problem is how can you get an entire universe from 0 kelvin only 14 billion years ?🤔
You are beautiful with or without hair, my friend!!! Great video!!!
@ArvinAsh
Жыл бұрын
Thank you. I appreciate that.
So, that's the transparent head you were sspeaking of, Mr. Ash? It's like me, invisible hair. Your head is pretty much there
Since life is a random colocation of atoms, it should spontaneously occur in any warm pool of seawater.Creating life in a controlled environment like a biology lab should be an everyday occurence.
@ReapingTheHarvest
Ай бұрын
But that will never happen.
Arvin Sir, how can I send you an email?
Hey bro how does every single atom has so much energy where does it comes from.Why it is difficult to break an atom from an molecule
Cassini photo of the earth through the rings of Saturn make you realise how small and difficult it would be to find earth in the universe. And on the earth are even even smaller human minds. Now we know how minds smaller than humans cannot think very much. So if there was a bigger mind in the universe what would it know? Our simple minds have worked out so much, so what would a huge mind think ? Just thinking about all that you talk about.
What caused the big bang? And which came first, big bang or hydrogen molecule? If big bang happenned first, what gave its energy level?
@ArvinAsh
Жыл бұрын
Big bang came long before molecules. As far as where the energy "came from," we don't know.
That free trade analogy is so opaque. The number of people who don't understand lower energy levels but do understand international economics are relatively few. Why that particular analogy?
Could we be the universe´s self innate intelligence trying to give a reason to itself? The same universe looking for consciousness that can give itself a meaning? What would be the reason for existence if noone is going to be there to observe its majesty?
@ArvinAsh
Жыл бұрын
I don't think there is celestial intent or purpose to our existence.
From nothing and very beginging of the universe, there is a course of actions, a purpose, leading everything into life.
The image of two hydrogen atoms bound with their respective electrons stuck in the middle is highly misleading
How does mass emerge from atoms? Is matter like a hologram, emerging from atoms?
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
How did atoms just suddenly appear, no one can answer that
@ArvinAsh
Жыл бұрын
Atoms did not just appear. Energy appeared, then over time atoms formed when conditions were right. We don't know how the energy initially appeared. See this video on how atoms first came: kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZoaVm9GafNLbd7g.html
Arvin, do you think stars are entangling atoms? I think they are. Circulating in the star under pressure and colliding for millions of years of the life of the star. We entangle molecules in the lab by colliding them.
How was time perceived in the early universe
@ArvinAsh
Жыл бұрын
same as it is now
I like to think of things simplistically so my little brain can handle it. So, I think you’re basically saying after the Big Bang hydrogen and helium atoms were formed, which coalesced into suns. These suns manufactured some heavier atoms which got blasted into space when some of the biggest suns went supernova. Also if the remnant of the sun formed a black hole, these would consume the smaller stars, shred them and blast their matter into space as well. This matter, containing heavier elements, might either coalesce again to form second generation stars, which would manufacture even heavier elements, or it would form molecules which would become part of the formation of planets along with the heavier atoms (aka dust and gas). So, this all seems like a very efficient system for star and planet formation. But after that it becomes so random and pure luck as to where these planets form, what they’re primarily composed of, ie dust or gas, how large they are, where they are in relation to the sun, and many other factors. Of all the planets in our solar system, it’s currently only Earth that has made and can support complex life, and that’s because we’re in the Goldilocks zone in relation to the sun, and we have a moon. My theory has always been that the universe is one giant sun and matter manufacturing system designed to create and support life. However, if the JWST does not find life in other solar systems, then I don’t see the point of it all.
How come organic molecules form, didn't the electrons of thier orbit repel it and prevented it to form bonds?
@ArvinAsh
Жыл бұрын
No, molecules can form just like they form on earth if the overall energy is lower. See my video for why molecules form: kzread.info/dash/bejne/k659j8GMZsqec5s.html
@neerajmehta3461
Жыл бұрын
@@ArvinAsh I couldn't believe you proposed the same question as I commented. It really filled me in, I think I should review your old videos
Science has NO IDEA, at all, how life began.
Wow, your old hair looked awesome😎
@ArvinAsh
Жыл бұрын
Old hair? Same as I have now.
@MarsStarcruiser
Жыл бұрын
@@ArvinAsh lol, young hair I suppose. I got use to wearing beanie for same reason after mine started to go too, but minoxidil seems to be doing a good job preventing any more loss.
OH YEAH ! ...my ancesters ...
when electron behave like a wave then will it properties like mass spin charge angular momentum effect of gravity be zero
I wonder where the first ever molecule is now
First molecule? Then it should be molecule of helium hydride or hydrogen. From hydrogen molecules to consiousness. Given enough time, Hydrogen starts to wonder where it came from, and where its going.
If the universe used to be hotter, then it cooled... is it still becoming colder? If not, why did it stop cooling? If it is still cooling then will that eventually lead to new atoms or new molecular combinations that don't/can't exist now?
@LordRaven256
Жыл бұрын
Yes it's still getting cooler due to the continued expansion. But it's already very near absolute zero so the effect is minimal. Think about it like this: In the beginning 'everything' was crammed into a relatively small space. So all particles were crashing into other particles all the time time because they were so close together and there was no 'free' space to go to. That means any bond/connection between two particles/atoms that might have formed was immediately shattered by the impact of other high speed particles. (Remember: 'heat' is kinetic energy). Only after there was enough 'space' between the existing particles due to the continued expansion there was a chance to form atoms and then molecules without them getting destroyed immediately. So 'cooling' = having more room to move into.
How did these atoms get conscious?
@ArvinAsh
Жыл бұрын
Atoms are not conscious. But yes, a collection of them in the brain does result in consciousness in living organisms through a process we don't completely understand. But just because it's currently unknown doesn't mean that it's anything supernatural, or even special.
@-Suptharoopini.
Жыл бұрын
@@ArvinAsh Do we mean the brain when we say consciousness and intelligence? The Saangiya yogam book was written 2000 years before..in this book, this universe contains two bodies.. That is big body and small body.big body refers by panja pootham and small body shrink into 8 scales..These small bodies have consciousness and intelligence which was given in the text..
Sir , are you on discord? If yes, can you send me a link.
How long does a single hydrogen atom last floating in space if left undisturbed?
It seems to me that creating molecules is easier than creating the atoms themselves because they require lower energies than atoms.
So my question is something else। Well you tried to establish a link between how molecules are differently formed beside other heavier elements but only that molecular compounds responsible for life?? If we carefully look into living organisms we see when that organism die his body remain intact for few hours then it started to disintrigate। What is that supernatural phenomenon that keeps life prevent from rotting disintrigating when it was alive!! Any explanation plz?
@EBDavis111
Жыл бұрын
Why would you assume that just because you don't know the answer, it must be supernatural? Molecules decay in living bodies, but the organism just makes more of them.
@user-ef2lt2wi5s
Жыл бұрын
@@EBDavis111 what are you trying to say elaborate a bit plz।
@user-ef2lt2wi5s
Жыл бұрын
@@EBDavis111 my bad i intermingle physics with biology but you flipped my point। Actually what i was saying only molecular compounds doesn't give birth to life otherwise the living organism wouldn't have died!! would they??
@EBDavis111
Жыл бұрын
@@user-ef2lt2wi5s HOw do you think the the living organisms sythensize new molecules? Other molecules make them.
@user-ef2lt2wi5s
Жыл бұрын
@@EBDavis111 i am not thinking anything here। Look carefully what i said before
theoretical minimum energy required to accelerate 1 kg of matter to escape velocity from the Earth's surface (ignoring the planet's atmosphere) (6.3×10^7 J) = (((7.7623998×10^20)(speed of light^2))(m_e))